Paul Novick's 1936 Visit to the Jewish Autonomous Region

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Paul Novick's 1936 Visit to the Jewish Autonomous Region Paul Novick’s 1936 Visit to the Jewish Autonomous Region APPENDIX: PAUL NOVICK’S 1936 VISIT TO THE JEWISH AUTONOMOUS REGION Paul Novick visited Birobidzhan between July 25 and September 25, 1936, and published a book describing his experiences. He traveled on trains, boats, and horse-drawn wagons, visiting cities and towns, collective farms, and endless miles of taiga and forest. Birobidzhan, he remarked in the very fi rst sentence of his book, was “a word . now on the lips of Jews the world over.” The region was the manifestation of the “complete solution of the Jewish question through workers’ power.” It provided hope to millions of Jews, particularly in Poland, “who are prepared to go, and wait impatiently for that joyful moment.” Perhaps unconsciously, the atheist and Communist Novick used Biblical imagery throughout the book: “Yes, she is beautiful and rich,” he wrote. “This is an outstanding land, containing everything required to sustain a great industry and a rich agriculture.” In its “tremendously fruitful soil,” crops “grow and ripen . if ever there was a land where honey fl owed it is—the Jewish Autonomous Region.” But this near- empty space had fewer than two people per square kilometer: “A land one and one half times the size of Belgium…contains about sixty thousand people. It needs many millions—of Jews.” Thousands of acres of productive land awaited the people who would till it, Novick wrote. He had travelled by boat along the Amur River and had not seen a single soul for many kilometers. The countryside cried out for people. There was much to do in Birobidzhan, which was becoming “the Jewish socialist autonomous republic, the national home for the Jewish people.” Novick spent 15 days in the city of Birobidzhan, which was growing so fast it would soon be a world center. Though it had a population of only 28,000, Novick reported that it felt like a much larger city, with its wide avenues and sidewalks, its parks, theaters and technical schools. Wherever one looked, one saw new buildings under construction; one heard the “music of saw and hammer.” Novick visited children’s schools and buildings housing the local Communist Party and Soviet. Birobidzhan was becoming home to many writers, teachers and cultural workers: It was “a new country, a new life” for the “old Jewish people,” who were now “becoming younger.” Novick next visited the Birofeld and Frayland collective farms. His guide, one of the earliest Jewish pioneers in Birobidzhan, said to him, as they ascended a hill and saw before them a green and sunny countryside, with fresh and soft colors: “Well, look at this promised (and delivered) land!” They inspected an apiary belonging to Birofeld, 249 A PPENDIX I with 1,500 beehives and fi elds of wheat and soy. There would be many human and natural obstacles still to overcome but, Novick felt, “things were moving forward.” His next outing took Novick south to Blucherovo on the Amur River across from Manchuria. Here, too, offi cials told Novick that settlers were needed, to cultivate 2,000 hectares of land. Novick boarded a boat upriver to Stalinsk and then Amurzet, marveling at the scenery en route, but also aware of the Japanese on the other side of the river.1 “I have seen the Mississippi, the Rhine, the Nile and the Thames,” he wrote, “and this river can certainly compare.” Wild fl owers grew along the banks of the river, and the forests spread out in every direction. “The air was fragrant and fresh.” He was overwhelmed by the beauty of the area. A fellow passenger, a Russian, told Novick he was impatient with the pace of Jewish settlement. “Take a look at what we own!…Gold and coal and iron! Endless forests! And did you see the empty tracts of level land? Everything is available here!” Novick recalled that in the northern part of Birobidzhan, in the resort of Kaldur, a spa famous for its mineral waters, “A feeling of joy overcame me, that the Jewish Autonomous Region possessed such a treasure.” He urged that Kaldur—“one of the most beautiful pearls in the Jewish Autonomous Region”—be developed quickly, “to bring health and life and joy for the masses of working people.” When Novick returned to the capital city of Birobidzhan, he was greeted by much activity: the paving of various streets; the demolition of old buildings to construct new hotels, restaurants, and a library; and the laying of a foundation for a new electricity station which would be able to supply power for a projected population of 120,000. The pace of construction and activity was amazing, and for this he credited the Communist activists. A plenum of the local Communist Party was in session, and “One could feel how quickly the road was being taken to reach the coming Jewish Soviet-republic!” The Communist plenum was making “grandiose plans” for 1937: there were to be 25 new collective farms, a new knitting mill, a wagon plant, electricity plants, a shoe factory, and a sock and rope factory. Plans called for 10,000 new settlers in 1937. As its socialist prosperity increased, the USSR would be even more eager to assist in developing Jewish statehood in Birobidzhan “with a generous, freely extended Soviet hand.” Novick was particularly impressed at how hard Russians and other non-Jews were working together to build the Jewish Autonomous Region: “Birobidzhan is making a new leap forward. Birobidzhan is racing forward towards true development.” Novick also reported on his meetings with the local Jewish commanders of the Red Army that protected Birobidzhan against the Japanese on the other side of the Amur. Speaking Yiddish, they asked him to inform 250 Paul Novick’s 1936 Visit to the Jewish Autonomous Region the Jews of America that in Birobidzhan, the Leninist-Stalinist national policy was being carried out: “All of us, Jews and non-Jews, we are building the Jewish region!” Birobidzhan was an example of the fraternal relations between nationality and nationality in the Soviet Union. Novick was reminded that on August 29, the Jewish Autonomous Region had been declared the center of Jewish national culture for the entire Jewish working people. Novick marveled at the fact that Russian children were attending Yiddish language schools and becoming familiar with Yiddish literature. This was indeed an example of the “new civilization, the Soviet one, and proof of how it had solved the national question.” Novick’s train trip back to Moscow took eight days. His thoughts remained with Birobidzhan as he travelled westwards, for the fi rst six hours, from one station to another within the Jewish Autonomous Region: “One becomes drawn in by the rapid pace of construction in this beautiful land…One feels at home as soon as one enters. You meet so many familiar people, even if meeting them for the fi rst time…So it hurt to leave. Hard to say one’s goodbyes. In one’s mind there were so many memories.” Novick admitted it would take very hard work to make Birobidzhan a success: “The road to the Jewish Soviet-republic is not through fl owers and music.” It was not easy to deal with “virgin earth.” People and materials had to be brought from far away. “But behind Birobidzhan stood the vigor of the great Soviet nation, of the great Communist Party.” Every nationality in the Soviet Union, including the Jews, was worthy of self-determination, of a healthy national culture, and a healthy economic life.2 Upon Novick’s return to Moscow, he was interviewed by the Moscow News. “Foreign Jews, carefully selected, are being invited to settle in Biro-Bidjan as rapidly as housing accommodations can be prepared for them,” he told the newspaper.3 Reading Novick’s book, one can sense the tremendous longing for a Jewish “place of our own,” a piece of the globe where Jews would be in the majority and run their own affairs, even if that place, rather than being totally sovereign, was merely a “national home.” His loving descriptions bring to mind the chronicles of Jewish travelers to the land of Israel. To Novick, Birobidzhan seemed a place where Jews were building a homeland, helped by socially progressive, non-Jewish but philosemitic friends. Novick’s account served almost as a fantasy counterpart to the real world his readers inhabited. In that real world, American Jews daily encountered animosity and anti-Semitism; European Jews suffered and died at the hands of fascists; while in Palestine, Jews struggled to achieve statehood in opposition both to the British imperial authorities and the indigenous Arabs. Little wonder, then, that reportage such as Novick’s was used by Ambijan and the ICOR to attract enthusiastic new members.4 251 A PPENDIX I ENDNOTES 1 Blucherovo later became known as Leninskoye. Stalinsk was previously called Stalinfeld, and later Oktyabrskoye; it no longer exists. 2 Paul Novick, Yidn in biro-bidzhan, 9-12, 15-22, 27-32, 36-37, 46-60, 73, 81-91. 3 The article was reprinted by the ICOR. See Julia Older, “Biro-Bidjan as it Grows,” Nailebn-New Life 10, 12 (December 1936): 9-11 [English section]. 4 The fantasy of Birobidzhan as a Soviet “promised land” for Jews extended to outright falsehoods. The September 1936 issue of Nailebn-New Life, on p. 12 [English section] ran a photo entitled “A Spot in Biro-Bidjan” showing a grove of palm trees! 252.
Recommended publications
  • Information for Persons Who Wish to Seek Asylum in the Russian Federation
    INFORMATION FOR PERSONS WHO WISH TO SEEK ASYLUM IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION “Everyone has the right to seek and to enjoy in the other countries asylum from persecution”. Article 14 Universal Declaration of Human Rights I. Who is a refugee? According to Article 1 of the Federal Law “On Refugees”, a refugee is: “a person who, owing to well‑founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of particular social group or politi‑ cal opinion, is outside the country of his nationality and is unable or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country”. If you consider yourself a refugee, you should apply for Refugee Status in the Russian Federation and obtain protection from the state. If you consider that you may not meet the refugee definition or you have already been rejected for refugee status, but, nevertheless you can not re‑ turn to your country of origin for humanitarian reasons, you have the right to submit an application for Temporary Asylum status, in accordance to the Article 12 of the Federal Law “On refugees”. Humanitarian reasons may con‑ stitute the following: being subjected to tortures, arbitrary deprivation of life and freedom, and access to emergency medical assistance in case of danger‑ ous disease / illness. II. Who is responsible for determining Refugee status? The responsibility for determining refugee status and providing le‑ gal protection as well as protection against forced return to the country of origin lies with the host state. Refugee status determination in the Russian Federation is conducted by the Federal Migration Service (FMS of Russia) through its territorial branches.
    [Show full text]
  • A Documentation of the Jewish Heritage in Siberia
    Informationen der Bet Tfila – Forschungsstelle für jüdische Architektur in Europa bet-tfila.org/info Nr. 18 1+2/15 Fakultät 3, Technische Universität Braunschweig / Center for Jewish Art, Hebrew University of Jerusalem SPECIAL EDITION “Siberia” – SONDERAUSGABE „Sibirien“ “From Jerusalem to Birobidzhan” – A Documentation of the Jewish Heritage in Siberia In August 2015, the team of the Center for Jewish Art at the Hebrew University Erstmalig erscheint aus aktuellem Anlass of Jerusalem undertook a research expedition to Siberia. Over the course of 21 eine Sonderausgabe von bet tfila.org/info: Im days, the expedition spanned 6,000 km. Overall, the CJA team visited 16 sites August 2015 konnte sich das deutsch-israe- in Siberia and the Russian Far East: Tomsk, Mariinsk, Achinsk, Krasnoyarsk, lische Team des Center for Jewish Art und Kansk, Nizhneudinsk, Irkutsk, Babushkin (former Mysovsk), Kabansk, Ulan- der Bet Tfila – Forschungsstelle einen lange Ude (former Verkhneudinsk), Barguzin, Petrovsk Zabaikalskii (former Petrovskii gehegten Wunsch erfüllen und das jüdische Zavod), Chita, Khabarovsk, Birobidzhan, and Vladivostok. Erbe in Sibirien und im „Fernen Osten“ Russlands dokumentieren. In drei Wochen 16 synagogues and 4 collections of ritual objects were documented alongside a legten die fünf Wissenschaftler (Prof. Aliza survey of 11 Jewish cemeteries and numerous Jewish houses. The team consisted Cohen-Mushlin, Dr. Vladimir Levin, Dr. of Prof. Aliza Cohen-Mushlin, Dr. Vladimir Levin, Dr. Katrin Kessler (Bet Tfila, Katrin Keßler, Dr. Anna Berezin und Archi- Braunschweig), Dr. Anna Berezin, and architect Zoya Arshavsky. The expedi- tektin Zoya Arshavsky) auf ihrer Reise von tion was made possible with the generous donations of Mrs. Josephine Urban, Tomsk nach Vladivostok über 6.000 km zu- London, and an anonymous donor.
    [Show full text]
  • A Region with Special Needs the Russian Far East in Moscow’S Policy
    65 A REGION WITH SPECIAL NEEDS THE RUSSIAN FAR EAST IN MOSCOW’s pOLICY Szymon Kardaś, additional research by: Ewa Fischer NUMBER 65 WARSAW JUNE 2017 A REGION WITH SPECIAL NEEDS THE RUSSIAN FAR EAST IN MOSCOW’S POLICY Szymon Kardaś, additional research by: Ewa Fischer © Copyright by Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich im. Marka Karpia / Centre for Eastern Studies CONTENT EDITOR Adam Eberhardt, Marek Menkiszak EDITOR Katarzyna Kazimierska CO-OPERATION Halina Kowalczyk, Anna Łabuszewska TRANSLATION Ilona Duchnowicz CO-OPERATION Timothy Harrell GRAPHIC DESIGN PARA-BUCH PHOTOgrAPH ON COVER Mikhail Varentsov, Shutterstock.com DTP GroupMedia MAPS Wojciech Mańkowski PUBLISHER Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich im. Marka Karpia Centre for Eastern Studies ul. Koszykowa 6a, Warsaw, Poland Phone + 48 /22/ 525 80 00 Fax: + 48 /22/ 525 80 40 osw.waw.pl ISBN 978-83-65827-06-7 Contents THESES /5 INTRODUctiON /7 I. THE SPEciAL CHARActERISticS OF THE RUSSIAN FAR EAST AND THE EVOLUtiON OF THE CONCEPT FOR itS DEVELOPMENT /8 1. General characteristics of the Russian Far East /8 2. The Russian Far East: foreign trade /12 3. The evolution of the Russian Far East development concept /15 3.1. The Soviet period /15 3.2. The 1990s /16 3.3. The rule of Vladimir Putin /16 3.4. The Territories of Advanced Development /20 II. ENERGY AND TRANSPORT: ‘THE FLYWHEELS’ OF THE FAR EAST’S DEVELOPMENT /26 1. The energy sector /26 1.1. The resource potential /26 1.2. The infrastructure /30 2. Transport /33 2.1. Railroad transport /33 2.2. Maritime transport /34 2.3. Road transport /35 2.4.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Grain Elevators in Which Grain Will Be Deposited for Subsequent Shipment to China
    List of grain elevators in which grain will be deposited for subsequent shipment to China Contact Infromation (phone № Name of elevators Location num. / email) Zabaykalsky Krai Rapeseed 1 ООО «Zabaykalagro» Zabaykalsku krai, Borzya, ul. Matrosova, 2 8-914-120-29-18 2 OOO «Zolotoy Kolosok» Zabaykalsky Krai, Nerchinsk, ul. Octyabrskaya, 128 30242-44948 3 OOO «Priargunskye prostory» Zabaykalsky Krai, Priargunsk ul. Urozhaynaya, 6 (924) 457-30-27 Zabaykalsky Krai, Priargunsky district, village Starotsuruhaytuy, Pertizan 89145160238, 89644638969, 4 LLS "PION" Shestakovich str., 3 [email protected] LLC "ZABAYKALSKYI 89144350888, 5 Zabaykalskyi krai, Chita city, Chkalova street, 149/1 AGROHOLDING" [email protected] Individual entrepreneur head of peasant 6 Zabaykalskyi krai, Chita city, st. Juravleva/home 74, apartment 88 89243877133, [email protected] farming Kalashnikov Uriy Sergeevich 89242727249, 89144700140, 7 OOO "ZABAYKALAGRO" Zabaykalsky krai, Chita city, Chkalova street, 147A, building 15 [email protected] Zabaykalsky krai, Priargunsky district, Staroturukhaitui village, 89245040356, 8 IP GKFH "Mungalov V.A." Tehnicheskaia street, house 4 [email protected] Corn 1 ООО «Zabaykalagro» Zabaykalsku krai, Borzya, ul. Matrosova, 2 8-914-120-29-18 2 OOO «Zolotoy Kolosok» Zabaykalsky Krai, Nerchinsk, ul. Octyabrskaya, 128 30242-44948 3 OOO «Priargunskye prostory» Zabaykalsky Krai, Priargunsk ul. Urozhaynaya, 6 (924) 457-30-27 Individual entrepreneur head of peasant 4 Zabaykalskyi krai, Chita city, st. Juravleva/home 74, apartment 88 89243877133, [email protected] farming Kalashnikov Uriy Sergeevich Rice 1 ООО «Zabaykalagro» Zabaykalsku krai, Borzya, ul. Matrosova, 2 8-914-120-29-18 2 OOO «Zolotoy Kolosok» Zabaykalsky Krai, Nerchinsk, ul. Octyabrskaya, 128 30242-44948 3 OOO «Priargunskye prostory» Zabaykalsky Krai, Priargunsk ul.
    [Show full text]
  • Newell, J. 2004. the Russian Far East
    Industrial pollution in the Komsomolsky, Solnechny, and Amursky regions, and in the city of Khabarovsk and its Table 3.1 suburbs, is excessive. Atmospheric pollution has been increas- Protected areas in Khabarovsk Krai ing for decades, with large quantities of methyl mercaptan in Amursk, formaldehyde, sulfur dioxide, phenols, lead, and Type and name Size (ha) Raion Established benzopyrene in Khabarovsk and Komsomolsk-on-Amur, and Zapovedniks dust prevalent in Solnechny, Urgal, Chegdomyn, Komso- molsk-on-Amur, and Khabarovsk. Dzhugdzhursky 860,000 Ayano-Maysky 1990 Between 1990 and 1999, industries in Komsomolsky and Bureinsky 359,000 Verkhne-Bureinsky 1987 Amursky Raions were the worst polluters of the Amur River. Botchinsky 267,400 Sovetsko-Gavansky 1994 High concentrations of heavy metals, copper (38–49 mpc), Bolonsky 103,600 Amursky, Nanaisky 1997 KHABAROVSK zinc (22 mpc), and chloroprene (2 mpc) were found. Indus- trial and agricultural facilities that treat 40 percent or less of Komsomolsky 61,200 Komsomolsky 1963 their wastewater (some treat none) create a water defi cit for Bolshekhekhtsirsky 44,900 Khabarovsky 1963 people and industry, despite the seeming abundance of water. The problem is exacerbated because of: Federal Zakazniks Ⅲ Pollution and low water levels in smaller rivers, particular- Badzhalsky 275,000 Solnechny 1973 ly near industrial centers (e.g., Solnechny and the Silinka River, where heavy metal levels exceed 130 mpc). Oldzhikhansky 159,700 Poliny Osipenko 1969 Ⅲ A loss of soil fertility. Tumninsky 143,100 Vaninsky 1967 Ⅲ Fires and logging, which impair the forests. Udylsky 100,400 Ulchsky 1988 Ⅲ Intensive development and quarrying of mineral resourc- Khekhtsirsky 56,000 Khabarovsky 1959 es, primarily construction materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Nation Making in Russia's Jewish Autonomous Oblast: Initial Goals
    Nation Making in Russia’s Jewish Autonomous Oblast: Initial Goals and Surprising Results WILLIAM R. SIEGEL oday in Russia’s Jewish Autonomous Oblast (Yevreiskaya Avtonomnaya TOblast, or EAO), the nontitular, predominately Russian political leadership has embraced the specifically national aspects of their oblast’s history. In fact, the EAO is undergoing a rebirth of national consciousness and culture in the name of a titular group that has mostly disappeared. According to the 1989 Soviet cen- sus, Jews compose only 4 percent (8,887/214,085) of the EAO’s population; a figure that is decreasing as emigration continues.1 In seeking to uncover the reasons for this phenomenon, I argue that the pres- ence of economic and political incentives has motivated the political leadership of the EAO to employ cultural symbols and to construct a history in its effort to legitimize and thus preserve its designation as an autonomous subject of the Rus- sian Federation. As long as the EAO maintains its status as one of eighty-nine federation subjects, the political power of the current elites will be maintained and the region will be in a more beneficial position from which to achieve eco- nomic recovery. The founding in 1928 of the Birobidzhan Jewish National Raion (as the terri- tory was called until the creation of the Jewish Autonomous Oblast in 1934) was an outgrowth of Lenin’s general policy toward the non-Russian nationalities. In the aftermath of the October Revolution, the Bolsheviks faced the difficult task of consolidating their power in the midst of civil war. In order to attract the support of non-Russians, Lenin oversaw the construction of a federal system designed to ease the fears of—and thus appease—non-Russians and to serve as an example of Soviet tolerance toward colonized peoples throughout the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Courses That Go Places with Google Earth! Online Tools Can Make Our Students Stronger Place-Based Learners
    CETL Weekly Teaching Tips presents Courses that Go Places with Google Earth! Online tools can make our students stronger place-based learners. Students can use Google Earth to explore the places that involve your content and map out tours, travel routes, and activities based on a historical, literary, or scientific event. Once complete, they can hand it in like a regular assignment. They not only learn more cultural information, but contextualize the real places where abstract ideas take action. Google Earth 6.0, a free download, offers Students can map instructions on how to out routes, recommending city create custom stops along the way, geographical guides. or they can explore specific sites within a city. The Placemarks and tours guide explains how to create and edit place markers, how to include individual markers in a folder, and how to send tour files. And see the way your students see the world of your content, from the places of scientific discovery, civil unrest, artistic concentration, and more. For a look into a professor’s activities with Google Earth and more specific directions, visit oakland.edu/teachingtips ! CETL adapted this material Greg Allar’s contribu:on to the 2013 Oakland University Instruconal Fair. Photo Credit ©2007 TerraMetrics Courses that Go Places with Google Earth A great (irst internet assignment for acclimating students to the places related to a course is to use Google Earth to allow students to explore areas, learn about them, write what they have learned with descriptions in the “pushpin” spots. They can create personalized tours based on what interests them and turn in the (iles as an assignment.
    [Show full text]
  • The Jewish Autonomous Region in Siberia. Multicultural Heritage and Coexistence
    Studia z Geografii Politycznej i Historycznej tom 3 (2014), s. 151–170 Alessandro Vitale The Jewish Autonomous Region in Siberia. Multicultural heritage and coexistence Technically, Israel is not the only official Jewish homeland in the world. In the Far East of Russian Siberia there still exists the Jewish Autonomous Region (JAR) of Biro- bidzhan. Beginning in 1928 the Soviet Union set aside a territory larger than Belgium and Holland combined and considerably bigger than Israel, for Jewish settlement, located some five thousands miles east of Moscow along the Soviet-Chinese border, between the 48th and 49th parallels north latitude, where the climate and conditions are similar to Ontario and Michigan. Believing that Soviet Jewish people, like other national minorities, deserved a territorial homeland, the Soviet regime decided to settle a territory that in 1934 would become the Jewish Autonomous Region. The idea was to create a new Zion – in a move to counterweight to Palestine – where a “proletarian Jewish culture” based on Yiddish language could be developed. In fact, the establishment of the JAR was the first instance of an officially acknowledged Jewish national territory since ancient times: the “First Israel”. But the history of the Region was tragic and the ex- periment failed. Nevertheless, Birobidzhan’s renewed existence of today and the revival of Jewish life in the post-Soviet JAR are not only a curious legacy of Soviet national policy, but after the break-up of the Soviet Union and the worldwide religious rebirth represent an interesting case-study in order to study some challenging geographic pro- blems, and interethnic relations.
    [Show full text]
  • FAR EASTERN FEDERAL DISTRICT Investment Projects
    FAR EASTERN FEDERAL DISTRICT Investment Projects Trade Representation of the Russian Federation in the United States of America FEFD: Investment Projects FAR EASTERN FEDERAL DISTRICT Territory - 6215,9 thousand sq.km Population - 6 440 400 people Administrative center - Khabarovsk Basic economic sectors - mining and gold mining industries, fishing industry, forestry and wood industry, non-ferrous metallurgy, shipbuilding industry Official web-sites - http://dfo.gov.ru/, http://minvostokrazvitia.ru/ 2 FEFD: Investment Projects 3 FEFD: Investment Projects ECONOMY Development of the Far East Region (including economic development) was historically associated with a defining role of the state. The Far East Region has great geopolitical importance, not only providing the economy with the resources, but also acting as a guarantor of national safety. That is why development of the Eastern territories was always based on the principles of paternalism that was the only possible way of forming permanent population at the Far East. The state has also invested a significant amount of money in the development of regional industry, transport infrastructure and cities’ constructions. Today major investment projects at the Far East are being executed with a special attention of the President of the Russian Federation and the Government. In the nearest future about 3 trillion rubles will be invested in the economy of the Far East Federal District on the basis of public-private partnership. And that is not the limit – till 2025 the investment portfolio of the region offers for realization major projects with the estimated cost of 9 trillion rubles. These numbers are incorporated in the “Strategy of the Social- Economic Development of the Far East and Baikal Regions till 2025”, which was approved by the President and the Government of the Russian Federation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Treasures of the Russian Taiga — from the Siberian Tiger
    SIBERIAN TIGER THE TREASURES OF THE RUSSIAN TAIGA — FROM THE SIBERIAN TIGER Russian forests offer a bounty of natural food and medicinal products. Both local villagers and wild animals depend on the mushrooms, berries, nuts, honey and medical plants that grow there. This booklet describes how wise use of non- timber forest resources helps to protect the ‘home’ of the Siberian tiger and to promote sustainable forest management in Russia. As a part of International Climate Initiative, the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety (BMUB) and KfW Development Bank sponsor collaborative projects by WWF Russia and WWF Germany that are implemented in the Russian Far East for the protection of Korean pine forests and Siberian tiger habitat. © Gennadiy Pavlishin illustrator The Siberian tiger is a rare Despite its might, this powerful animal endangered predator. It is the largest is very vulnerable. One of the greatest of five existing tiger subspecies and threats to its survival is the degradation the only one that lives in snow. of coniferous-broadleaved forests, the ‘home’ of the tiger. These forests play an essential role in preserving the unique biodiversity The 2005 inventory have of the Sikhote-Alin Mountains and shown that there are supporting its climatic and water about 450 Siberian tigers regimes. Unfortunately, they are often left in the wild in the subjected to degradative, unsustainable Russian Far East. logging practices. The most valuable areas of coniferous- broadleaved forests have been given a status of ‘nut harvesting zones’. Such zones preserve the treasures of the Korean pine forests and are used for harvesting edible and medical plants and hunting fur-bearing animals.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia: Birth Certificates Issued in Birobidzhan in 1949; Content; Language; Application Form Research Directorate, Immigration and Refugee Board, Ottawa
    Home > Research > Responses to Information Requests RESPONSES TO INFORMATION REQUESTS (RIRs) New Search | About RIR's | Help 23 December 2003 RUS42206.E Russia: Birth certificates issued in Birobidzhan in 1949; content; language; application form Research Directorate, Immigration and Refugee Board, Ottawa The Jewish Autonomous Region located in Russia's far east is often referred to by the name of its capital Birobidzhan (Birobidzan, Birobidjan, Birobijan) (Columbia Encyclopedia 2003; Pravda.ru 15 Oct. 2002; BBC 8 July 2002). Birobidzhan was formed in 1928 as a homeland for the Soviet Jewish population and later became an autonomous region in 1934 (Columbia Encyclopedia 2003). In the late 1940s, approximately one quarter of the region's population was Jewish (ibid.). Information on Soviet-era birth certificates is very scarce among the sources consulted, and the Research Directorate was unable to find references specifically concerning Birobidzhan. The Political Asylum Research and Documentation Service (PARDS) of Princeton, New Jersey noted that Soviet-era birth certificates mentioned the nationality of the parents and would also indicate whether a person was Jewish (June 1999, Sec. III.A.24). Please consult the numerous Responses discussing the issue of nationality on Soviet birth certificates, including, most recently RUS34401.FE of 11 May 2000, ZZZ34985.E of 10 August 2000 and ZZZ32611.E of 12 August 1999. This Response was prepared after researching publicly accessible information currently available to the Research Directorate within time constraints. This Response is not, and does not purport to be, conclusive as to the merit of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum. Please find below the list of additional sources consulted in researching this Information Request.
    [Show full text]
  • 300 Mylova J. A. PNU, Khabarovsk, Russia the PROCESS OF
    Том 1. Новые идеи нового века – 2018 Vol. 1 New Ideas of New Century –2018 Mylova J. A. [email protected] PNU, Khabarovsk, Russia THE PROCESS OF URBANIZATION IN THE FAR EAST REGION OF RUSSIA IN THE BEGINNING OF THE 20TH CENTURY Abstract. A new stage of development of the Far East of Russia begins as the part of the program of rapid industrialization and increasing the country's defense since the 1930s. In paral- lel with large industrial companies workers' settlements and cities were based in the Far East. The dynamics of formation and growth of new cities (Birobidzhan, Magadan, Komsomolsk-on- Amur) are displayed in the article. The specificity of urban design in terms of territorial remote- ness of the region is submitted.1 Keywords: socialist city, general plan, urbanization Introduction. During the Soviet period the concept of the new city was formu- lated, and the realisation of which in varying degrees determined the character of the formation of about 70% of Russian cities. There were certain patterns in the trends of that type of urban development, the study of which revealed the problems of modern life. The exploring of Russian Far Eastern cities helped to solve the problem of balanced development of the region as a whole, which seemed an issue of particular importance of national scale. Rethinking the Soviet urban planning approach made possible to de- termine the positive and negative aspects that affected the continuing development of the cities, as well as the formation social and comfortable urban environment. That fact actualized urban development assessment of planning structure of socialist cities in the Far Eastern region in the context of the historical development of the phase.
    [Show full text]