DOCSLIB.ORG

The State of the DOE National Laboratories: 2020 Edition

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The State of the DOE National Laboratories: 2020 Edition THE STATE OF THE DOE NATIONAL LABORATORIESENERGY FOR SPACE EXPLORATION U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY’S STRATEGY TO SUPPORT AMERICAN 2020 EDITION SPACE PREEMINENCE (FY 2021 – FY 2031) The State of the DOE National Laboratories: 2020 Edition 2 The State of the DOE National Laboratories: 2020 Edition TABLE OF CONTENTS Message from the Secretary of Energy ........................................................................................................ 5 Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................7 1. DOE at a Glance and an Overview of the National Laboratory System ...................................................11 1.1 DOE at a Glance .........................................................................................................................................11 1.2 Overview of the National Laboratory System ........................................................................................13 1.2.1 Types of DOE National Laboratories ...................................................................................................................14 1.2.2 The National Laboratory Ecosystem and Adaptability ................................................................................... 15 1.2.3 The National Laboratories’ Core Capabilities...................................................................................................16 1.3 Special Sections ......................................................................................................................................18 1.3.1 The National Laboratory Response to Bio-threats such as COVID-19 .......................................................18 1.3.2 DOE and the National Laboratories’ Role in Advancing U.S. Leadership in Space ................................19 1.3.3 DOE’s Role in the Future of Quantum Information Science ......................................................................... 21 2. Highlighting the National Laboratories’ S&T Accomplishments .......................................................... 25 3. How the National Laboratories Work with the Innovation Community .................................................31 3.1 Partnership Models .................................................................................................................................31 3.1.1 Partnering of National Laboratories and Other Entities through Research Centers, Hubs, and Institutes ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 32 3.1.2 Partnering with Academia ..................................................................................................................................... 32 3.1.3 Partnering among National Laboratories ......................................................................................................... 33 3.2 Transferring Technologies to Innovation Partners .............................................................................. 33 3.2.1 Innovation/Entrepreneurial and Lab-to-Market Activities ........................................................................... 34 3.2.2 Technology Maturation ......................................................................................................................................... 36 3.2.3 Contracting and Liability Reform ....................................................................................................................... 36 3.2.4 Increased Access to the Laboratory System .................................................................................................. 36 3.2.5 Fostering Multi-Lab Transfer Programs ............................................................................................................ 38 3.3 International Partnerships and Engagements .................................................................................... 38 3.4 How to Work with the National Laboratories ...................................................................................... 40 3.4.1 Partnership Agreements .......................................................................................................................................40 3.4.1.1 DOE User Facilities ............................................................................................................................................... 41 3 The State of the DOE National Laboratories: 2020 Edition 3.4.2 Intellectual Property .............................................................................................................................................. 42 3.4.3 Return on Investment ........................................................................................................................................... 42 3.4.4 Awards ...................................................................................................................................................................... 42 3.4.4.1 R&D 100 Awards ........................................................................................................................................ 42 3.4.4.2 Federal Laboratory Consortium (FLC) Awards .................................................................................. 43 4. The Department of Energy’s Strategy and the Future of the National Laboratory System ................ 45 4.1 Establishment of New Offices for Effectiveness and Coordination ............................................................... 45 4.1.1 The Office of Strategic Planning and Policy (OSPP) ....................................................................................... 45 4.1.2 The Laboratory Operations Board (LOB) .......................................................................................................... 45 4.1.3 The Artificial Intelligence and Technology Office (AITO) ................................................................................47 4.1.4 The Arctic Energy Office (AEO) .............................................................................................................................47 4.1.5 The Office of Cybersecurity, Energy Security, and Emergency Response (CESER) ..............................47 4.2 Fostering Collaboration through Crosscutting Initiatives and Reports ............................................ 48 4.2.1 The Research and Technology Investment Committee (RTIC) ................................................................... 48 4.2.2 The Secretary of Energy Advisory Board (SEAB) .......................................................................................... 48 4.2.3 The Office of Strategic Planning and Policy (OSPP) ..................................................................................... 49 4.3 Executing the Strategic Planning Process .......................................................................................... 49 4.3.1 DOE’s Federal Advisory Committees ................................................................................................................. 49 4.3.2 Strategic Management of Science, Energy, and NNSA Laboratories ...................................................... 50 4.3.3 Strategic Planning Process for User Facilities ................................................................................................ 51 4.4 Envisioning and Building Toward the Future of DOE ............................................................................51 4.4.1 NLDC “Future S&T Opportunities ....................................................................................................................... 51 4.4.2 Looking to the Future: DOE’s SC “Laboratories of the Future” ................................................................. 52 4.4.3 Developing the Future Workforce ...................................................................................................................... 52 4.4.3.1 Laboratory Operations Board’s Efforts to Identify Policy Implementations to Enhance the Workforce ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 52 Appendix A: Lab-at-a-glance Pages ..................................................................................................................................... 53 Appendix B: Department of Energy Accomplishments ................................................................................................. 87 Appendix C: Acronyms and Abbreviations ......................................................................................................................... 93 4 The State of the DOE National Laboratories: 2020 Edition MESSAGE FROM THE SECRETARY OF ENERGY The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), sometimes referred to as the “Department of Everything” or the “Department of Exploration,” is one of the most unique and critical U.S. government agencies due to its broad and diverse portfolio of research and development (R&D) activities. DOE has a rich and Dan R. Brouillette impactful history, populated by brilliant pioneers who then, and now, strive to Secretary of Energy
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Overview of the SPARC Tokamak
    This is a repository copy of Overview of the SPARC tokamak. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/166980/ Version: Published Version Article: Creely, A. J., Greenwald, M. J., Ballinger, S. B. et al. (42 more authors) (2020) Overview of the SPARC tokamak. Journal of Plasma Physics. 865860502. ISSN 0022-3778 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022377820001257 Reuse This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND) licence. This licence only allows you to download this work and share it with others as long as you credit the authors, but you can’t change the article in any way or use it commercially. More information and the full terms of the licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ J. Plasma Phys. (2020), vol. 86, 865860502 © The Author(s), 2020. 1 Published by Cambridge University Press This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
    [Show full text]
  • FT/P3-20 Physics and Engineering Basis of Multi-Functional Compact Tokamak Reactor Concept R.M.O
    FT/P3-20 Physics and Engineering Basis of Multi-functional Compact Tokamak Reactor Concept R.M.O. Galvão1, G.O. Ludwig2, E. Del Bosco2, M.C.R. Andrade2, Jiangang Li3, Yuanxi Wan3 Yican Wu3, B. McNamara4, P. Edmonds, M. Gryaznevich5, R. Khairutdinov6, V. Lukash6, A. Danilov7, A. Dnestrovskij7 1CBPF/IFUSP, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2Associated Plasma Laboratory, National Space Research Institute, São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil, 3Institute of Plasma Physics, CAS, Hefei, 230031, P.R. China, 4Leabrook Computing, Bournemouth, UK, 5EURATOM/UKAEA Fusion Association, Culham Science Centre, Abingdon, UK, 6TRINITI, Troitsk, RF, 7RRC “Kurchatov Institute”, Moscow, RF [email protected] Abstract An important milestone on the Fast Track path to Fusion Power is to demonstrate reliable commercial application of Fusion as soon as possible. Many applications of fusion, other than electricity production, have already been studied in some depth for ITER class facilities. We show that these applications might be usefully realized on a small scale, in a Multi-Functional Compact Tokamak Reactor based on a Spherical Tokamak with similar size, but higher fields and currents than the present experiments NSTX and MAST, where performance has already exceeded expectations. The small power outputs, 20-40MW, permit existing materials and technologies to be used. The analysis of the performance of the compact reactor is based on the solution of the global power balance using empirical scaling laws considering requirements for the minimum necessary fusion power (which is determined by the optimized efficiency of the blanket design), positive power gain and constraints on the wall load. In addition, ASTRA and DINA simulations have been performed for the range of the design parameters.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling-Enhanced Innovations Trailblazing Nuclear Energy Reinvigoration (MEITNER) Overview
    Modeling-Enhanced Innovations Trailblazing Nuclear Energy Reinvigoration (MEITNER) Overview B. PROGRAM OVERVIEW 1. Summary Nuclear reactor plants are complex systems where many types and scales of technologies must work together seamlessly. Design choices at each of those scales and for each of those technologies impact the rest of the system in terms of functionality, cost, and constructability. For nuclear energy to contribute in the coming decades, the next generation of nuclear reactor plants need to simultaneously achieve “walkaway” safe and secure operation, extremely low construction capital costs, and dramatically shorter construction and commissioning times than currently-available plants. To attain these goals, new, innovative, enabling technologies for existing advanced reactor designs are needed. The development of these enabling technologies requires understanding the inter-relatedness of design choices. Thus, ARPA-E encourages a rethinking of how pieces of the nuclear reactor system fit together when developing these enabling technologies. Through the MEITNER1 (Modeling-Enhanced Innovations Trailblazing Nuclear Energy Reinvigoration) program, ARPA-E seeks to identify and develop innovative technologies to enable the advanced nuclear reactor design community to mature their designs for future commercial deployment. These enabling technologies can establish the basis for a modern, domestic supply chain supporting nuclear technology. As provided in this FOA, ARPA-E will select multiple Awardees (Prime Recipients) to develop
    [Show full text]
  • Fukun Tang Enrico Fermi Institute, the University of Chicago 5640 S. Ellis
    Fukun Tang Enrico Fermi Institute, The University of Chicago 5640 S. Ellis Ave, Chicago, IL 60637, USA Tel: (773)-834-4286 Fax: (773)-702-2971 Email: [email protected] Professional Employment: 1994.12-present: Sr. Electronics Engineer, Enrico Fermi Institute, The University of Chicago, USA. 1994.6-1994.12: Research Associate, Carnegie Mellon University, USA. 1993.1-1994.5: Electronics Engineer, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, USA. 1988.3-1992.12: Electronics Engineer, IHEP, China. 1986.3-1988.2: Electronics Engineer, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, USA 1979.1-1986.2: Assistant Engineer, IHEP, China. Professional Service: Member of IEEE. Member of Scientific Advisory Committee of Computer Applications in Nuclear and Plasma Sciences, IEEE. Elsevior Reviewer of Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A. Peer Reviewer of Transactions on Nuclear Science. Referee of IEEE NSS/MIC Conference. Member of Nuclear Electronics and Detector Technology Society of China (1980-1986). Member of Nuclear Medical Imaging Technology Society of China (1980-1986). USA Patents: (1): 2011/0220,802 Use of Flat Panel Micro-channel Photomultipliers in Sampling Calorimeter with Timing. (2) US Patent No: 7485872, Large area, Pico-second Resolution, Time of Flight Detectors Education: 1978, Nuclear Electronics, University of Science and Technology of China 2005, Project Management Program, The University of Chicago. Fields of Expertise: Very high speed, low-noise analog front-end, data acquisition and trigger electronics for high energy physics experiments, astronomy and cosmology researches. Ultra-high speed pulse sampling techniques for large-area, pico- seconds timing resolution of time-of-flight applications for high energy experiments and Positron Emission Tomography (PET) instrumentations.
    [Show full text]
  • Science Chicago Sep 2008—Aug 2009 FINAL REPORT
    The world’s largesT science celeBraTion. science chicago sep 2008—aug 2009 Final REPORT Spearheaded by the Museum of Science and Science is essential for our Industry and in partnership with Chicago’s leading civic, academic, scientific, corporate collective health and well-being, and nonprofit institutions, Science Chicago began as a year-long collaborative initiative to: economic viability and our > Highlight science and technology achievements > Increase access to science learning future. As Chicagoans, we each experiences > Promote dialogue about the importance of have a stake in ensuring that science and technology in the Chicago region. our region continues to respect, From September 2008 — August 2009, citizens enjoyed unparalleled access to more than 1,200 support and value science. dynamic in-person science experiences and countless ways to explore and share science on the web. This report presents highlights of the Science Chicago initiative; for more detailed highlights please refer to the website. We are grateful to the following donors for their generous support of The John D. and Catherine Abbott Science Chicago: T. MacArthur Foundation The Boeing Company The Searle Funds at The Chicago Illinois Tool Works Inc. Community Trust Motorola Table of Contents > 1 About Science Chicago 3 Letters 4 Executive Director letter Board of Advisor Co-Chair letters Board of Advisors Vice-Chair letter Science Council Chair letter Leadership and Staff 8 Board of Advisors Science Council Leadership Committee Honorary Committee Staff Project
    [Show full text]
  • A Bold New Approach for Space Exploration and Discovery
    Office of Science and Technology Policy National Aeronautics and Space Administration FACT SHEET A Bold New Approach for Space Exploration and Discovery • Adds $6 billion to NASA’s budget over five years and draws upon American ingenuity to enable us to embark on an ambitious 21st century program of human space exploration and observation of the Earth and the Universe. • Ends NASA’s Constellation program, which was planning to use an approach similar to the Apollo program to return astronauts to the Moon 50 years after that program’s triumphs. An independent panel found that Constellation was years behind schedule and would require large budget increases to land even a handful of astronauts back on the Moon before 2030. Instead, we are launching a bold new effort that invests in American ingenuity to develop more capable and innovative technologies for future space exploration. • In consultation with our partners, extends operation of the International Space Station likely to 2020 or beyond and enhances its utilization, bringing nations together in a common pursuit of discovery in space. • Initiates several new programs to transform the state of the art in space technologies, including flagship exploration technology development and demonstration programs, investments in early-stage advanced concepts, potential “game-changing” technologies, and new propulsion technologies – all intended to increase the reach and reduce the costs of future human space exploration as well as other NASA, government, and commercial space activities. • Enhances the Nation’s global climate change research and monitoring system, accelerating decadal survey missions and re-flying a satellite that will identify global carbon sources and sinks.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Physics: Science, Technology and Applications
    Prof. Kim Molvig April 20, 2006: 22.012 Fusion Seminar (MIT) DDD-T--TT FusionFusion D +T → α + n +17.6 MeV 3.5MeV 14.1MeV • What is GOOD about this reaction? – Highest specific energy of ALL nuclear reactions – Lowest temperature for sizeable reaction rate • What is BAD about this reaction? – NEUTRONS => activation of confining vessel and resultant radioactivity – Neutron energy must be thermally converted (inefficiently) to electricity – Deuterium must be separated from seawater – Tritium must be bred April 20, 2006: 22.012 Fusion Seminar (MIT) ConsiderConsider AnotherAnother NuclearNuclear ReactionReaction p+11B → 3α + 8.7 MeV • What is GOOD about this reaction? – Aneutronic (No neutrons => no radioactivity!) – Direct electrical conversion of output energy (reactants all charged particles) – Fuels ubiquitous in nature • What is BAD about this reaction? – High Temperatures required (why?) – Difficulty of confinement (technology immature relative to Tokamaks) April 20, 2006: 22.012 Fusion Seminar (MIT) DTDT FusionFusion –– VisualVisualVisual PicturePicture Figure by MIT OCW. April 20, 2006: 22.012 Fusion Seminar (MIT) EnergeticsEnergetics ofofof FusionFusion e2 V ≅ ≅ 400 KeV Coul R + R V D T QM “tunneling” required . Ekin r Empirical fit to data 2 −VNuc ≅ −50 MeV −2 A1 = 45.95, A2 = 50200, A3 =1.368×10 , A4 =1.076, A5 = 409 Coefficients for DT (E in KeV, σ in barns) April 20, 2006: 22.012 Fusion Seminar (MIT) TunnelingTunneling FusionFusion CrossCross SectionSection andand ReactivityReactivity Gamow factor . Compare to DT . April 20, 2006: 22.012 Fusion Seminar (MIT) ReactivityReactivity forfor DTDT FuelFuel 8 ] 6 c e s / 3 m c 6 1 - 0 4 1 x [ ) ν σ ( 2 0 0 50 100 150 200 T1 (KeV) April 20, 2006: 22.012 Fusion Seminar (MIT) Figure by MIT OCW.
    [Show full text]
  • Footnotes for ATOMIC ADVENTURES
    Footnotes for ATOMIC ADVENTURES Secret Islands, Forgotten N-Rays, and Isotopic Murder - A Journey into the Wild World of Nuclear Science By James Mahaffey While writing ATOMIC ADVENTURES, I tried to be careful not to venture off into subplots, however interesting they seemed to me, and keep the story flowing and progressing at the right tempo. Some subjects were too fascinating to leave alone, and there were bits of further information that I just could not abandon. The result is many footnotes at the bottom of pages, available to the reader to absorb at his or her discretion. To get the full load of information from this book, one needs to read the footnotes. Some may seem trivia, but some are clarifying and instructive. This scheme works adequately for a printed book, but not so well with an otherwise expertly read audio version. Some footnotes are short enough to be inserted into the audio stream, but some are a rambling half page of dense information. I was very pleased when Blackstone Audio agreed wholeheartedly that we needed to include all of my footnotes in this version of ATOMIC ADVENTURES, and we came up with this added feature: All 231 footnotes in this included text, plus all the photos and explanatory diagrams that were included in the text. I hope you enjoy reading some footnotes while listening to Keith Sellon-Wright tell the stories in ATOMIC ADVENTURES. James Mahaffey April 2017 2 Author’s Note Stories Told at Night around the Glow of the Reactor Always striving to beat the Atlanta Theater over on Edgewood Avenue, the Forsyth Theater was pleased to snag a one-week engagement of the world famous Harry Houdini, extraordinary magician and escape artist, starting April 19, 1915.1 It was issued an operating license, no.
    [Show full text]
  • The U.S. Department of Energy's Ten-Year-Plans for the Office Of
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY The U.S. Department of Energy’s Ten-Year-Plans for the Office of Science National Laboratories FY 2019 FY 2019 Annual Laboratory Plans for the Office of Science National Laboratories i Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................1 Ames Laboratory ........................................................................................................................................................3 Lab-at-a-Glance ......................................................................................................................................................3 Mission and Overview ............................................................................................................................................3 Core Capabilities .....................................................................................................................................................4 Science Strategy for the Future ..............................................................................................................................8 Infrastructure .........................................................................................................................................................8 Argonne National Laboratory .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Second Annual DOE Joint Genome Institute User Meeting
    Second Annual DOE Joint Genome Institute User Meeting Sponsored By U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science March 28–30, 2007 Marriott Hotel Walnut Creek, California Contents Speaker Presentations Abstracts alphabetical by speaker....................................................................................... 1 Poster Presentations Posters alphabetical by first author. *Presenting author. .................................................. 11 Attendees Current as of March 9, 2007 ............................................................................................. 69 Author Index ................................................................................................................... 77 iii iv Speaker Presentations Abstracts alphabetical by speaker. The JGI Aspergillus niger Genome Project Scott E. Baker ([email protected]) Fungal Biotechnology Team, Chemical and Biological Process Development Group, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA Aspergillus niger is an economically important filamentous ascomycete fungus that is used in industry for its prodigious production of citric acid and a number of enzymes. The DOE Joint Genome Institute has sequenced the genome of A. niger ATCC 1015, a wildtype strain and the source of the first patented microbial fermentation process for citric acid production. Preliminary annotation indicates the presence of over 250 glycosyl hydrolases. These enzymes are crucial for the degradation of lignocellulosic biomass into simple sugars and other chemical building blocks.
    [Show full text]
  • Agency Information
    Quadrennial Technology Review 2015 Chapter 1: Energy Challenges Supplemental Information Additional Information on Energy Challenges Agency Information Representative DOE Science and Energy Program Workshops U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Quadrennial Technology Review 2015 Agency Information Chapter 1: Supplemental Information Agency Information Many Federal Departments and Agencies conduct research, development, demonstration, and deployment (RDD&D) activities, policy and regulatory activities, and other actions related to clean energy technologies, as do many State Agencies. The following websites provide a starting point for examining some of the excellent work done by these Federal Agencies—with a primary focus on RDD&D activities, as well as those providing data and information helpful for informing those activities. State and local activities are not covered here. This is not a complete list across agencies or within agencies, only a starting point. For all of these agencies, searching their websites for the energy-related topics of interest is the best way to get up-to-date information. For regulatory and policy issues, the work done by the Quadrennial Energy Review provides a useful overview and framework.1 AGENCY/DIVISION and URL: Executive Office of the President (EOP) https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/eop Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/eop/ceq National Security Council (NSC) https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/eop/nsc Office of Management and Budget (OMB) https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/eop/ostp U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) http://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/usda/usdahome http://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/usda/usdahome?navid=ENERGY http://www.usda.gov/oce/energy/ http://www.ars.usda.gov/research/programs/programs.htm?NP_CODE=307 http://www.usda.gov/oce/reports/index.htm#renewable http://www.rd.usda.gov/about-rd/agencies/rural-utilities-service U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • National Laboratories Subcommittee (Pdf)
    The Regents of the University of California NATIONAL LABORATORIES SUBCOMMITTEE January 24, 2018 The National Laboratories Subcommittee met on the above date at Mission Bay Conference Center, San Francisco. Members present: Regents De Le Peña, Mancia, Napolitano, Ortiz Oakley, Pérez, and Tauscher; Chancellor Block In attendance: Secretary and Chief of Staff Shaw, Vice Presidents Budil and Ellis, Deputy General Counsel Woodall, and Recording Secretary McCarthy The meeting convened at 3:15 p.m. with Subcommittee Vice Chair De La Peña presiding. He acknowledged the dedicated service of Committee Chair Pattiz, who for ten years was chair of the Boards of Directors of the Los Alamos National Security LLC and the Lawrence Livermore National Security LLC. He had served in these roles with passion and distinction, affirming the importance of UC’s work with the National Laboratories. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING Upon motion duly made and seconded, the minutes of the meeting of November 15, 2017 were approved. 2. PRESENTATION ON THE STATE OF THE LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY [Background material was provided to Regents in advance of the meeting, and a copy is on file in the Office of the Secretary and Chief of Staff.] Vice President Budil expressed appreciation for Committee Chair Pattiz’ leadership and tireless advocacy over the past decade for the National Laboratories and the University’s role in the Los Alamos National Security LLC and the Lawrence Livermore National Security LLC. Ms. Budil introduced Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) Director Michael Witherell, who said he had been privileged to lead LBNL for two years.
    [Show full text]