DOCSLIB.ORG

The US Withdrawal from the Paris Agreement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The US Withdrawal from the Paris Agreement The US Withdrawal from the Paris Agreement Implications The atmosphere as global commons • Climate change is an issue of the management of the global atmospheric commons. • Successful commons management requires cooperation, predictability and reciprocity among all the affected parties, in this case all of humanity. • Any non-cooperation will inevitably lead to a ‘tragedy of the commons’ scenario, where the quality and productivity of the commons is progressively degraded, and the very survival of all of humanity is threatened. • Cooperation and reciprocity entails some congruence between the self- interest of individual nations and the collective interest of all nations. • The Paris agreement is premised on the notion of ‘enlightened self-interest’, i.e. that nations will continue to pursue their self interest in so far as such self-interest contributes to the global common good, and will abandon self- interest in cases where pursuit of individual national goals will harm the global common good, and in turn have negative consequences for the nation. The Paris Agreement • The principal aim of the Paris agreement is to reduce GHG emissions. • This will be achieved through different actions in different countries, based on low-emission and climate resilient development pathways. • Climate actions will entail shifting energy systems in all sectors of economic activity away from fossil fuels to greener and more efficient energy systems. • Both public and private investments are crucial for the achievement of the goals of the Paris agreement. • Investments must therefore be made consistent with the goals of the Paris Agreement. USA commitments under the Paris Agreement • U.S. is among the top two emitters of greenhouse gases (with China) • The US pledged $3 billion to the Green Climate Fund • Is a leader in the world economy and in technological innovation. • Thus the withdrawal will not only entail the potential impacts of USA GHG emissions on the global environment, but also the implications of the withdrawal of USA support to the financing of climate actions in the developing world. Paris Agreement: Strengths • The PA allows for countries to adjust their emissions targets relative to the actions of other countries. • Through the ratchet up mechanism, countries can assess their own NDCs and put in place mechanisms to increase their own ambitions. • This in turn should encourage other countries to act, in their own self-interest, to increase their contribution to the atmospheric commons. • The Paris agreement also allows countries to negotiate multilateral agreements outside of the agreement without requiring a renegotiation of the entire deal. • Thus in the long term the agreement provides a framework for incremental climate actions which will ultimately deliver the temperature goal based on the normative expectations that all countries will increase the ambitions of their climate actions. Paris Agreement weaknesses The Paris agreement recognized as a ‘weak’ agreement: • The absence of emissions targets. All emissions targets are voluntary and self-determined. – Countries choose their own starting baseline, – determine the time it will take to start reducing emissions, and – determine the amount of reductions that they will aim for. • The agreement is completely voluntary: – no enforcement mechanism to ensure that countries comply with their commitments, – no provisions for sanctions for non-compliance. • Because the agreement is non-binding, it does not have a requirement that countries domesticate it into national legislation. – Thus it may or may not carry any weight in national legislation and therefore may not require national entities to comply with it. – In the case of the USA, no national entity is required to undertake any new burdens to comply with the agreement. Key Questions The intended US withdrawal from the Agreement raises a fundamental question regarding the Paris Agreement itself. • Can a nation that is historically responsible for a significant proportion of carbon concentrations in the atmosphere for several decades be allowed to simply walk away from its responsibilities? • Stated differently, if the principle of Common but Differentiated Responsibilities and Respective capabilities is no longer the principle undergirding the global climate governance framework, can such a framework be expected to resolve the climate challenge? • What can be done by the rest of humanity? Reasons for Withdrawal • The US withdrawal from the Agreement is informed, at least in part, by the powerful interests of the fossil fuels lobby seeking enhanced profits from their investments in fossil fuels. • The Trump administration undertook to roll back "job-destroying" environmental regulations and to save fossil fuel jobs. • Despite global efforts to shift the sustainable development trajectory towards cleaner energy systems, vested fossil fuel interests remain dominant in policy in many countries (developed and developing). • The US has great difficulty crafting public policy to control private interests in climate change. • Trump’s decision lays bare this basic truth and calls for scholarly engagement to understand what this new found position of strength of the private sector, means for global climate policy Public Policy vs. Market Mechanisms • A key feature of the Paris Agreement is that the transition to a low carbon and climate resilient society will be policy-driven. • The Kyoto Protocol provided for a largely market driven solutions to climate change, based on creating carbon offsets through pricing and other trading mechanisms. • The NDCs, however, are based on the primacy of national planning processes and integration of climate actions into national development programmes. US Fossil Fuel Interests: Oil and Gas • Due to recent supply growth, the US has become the world’s largest producer of oil and gas. • This supply growth has been driven in part by advances in horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing technology, allowing oil and gas producers to access previously unreachable reserves. • It is also supported by generous national subsidies at federal and state levels. • Offshore exploration activity in the US’s Alaskan Arctic waters, particularly by Shell, underscores the drive to find new and harder-to-reach fossil fuel reserves across the US US Fossil Fuel Interests: Coal • US coal production fell below 900 million metric tons in 2013 for the first time in two decades • Market capitalization of the top four US coal producers has declined from $22 billion 2010 to $1.2 billion in mid-2015, (The Economist, 2015). • Coal-fired power is being crowded out by natural gas and, to a lesser degree, new renewables. • Dozens of coal-fired power plants were also being shut due to local and national advocacy efforts as well as forthcoming regulation relating to air pollution and climate impacts (Grunwald, 2015). Support for Fossil Fuel • Fracking made available cheaper gas, which has been replacing coal as the main energy source for electricity generation. • Support for fossil fuels has been a consistent feature of successive US administrations. – E.g. subsidies to oil (as to fracking) actually increased during Obamas tenure. • Observed reductions in coal were thus due to economic considerations and were not as a result of ideological fossil fuel public policy change. Fossil Fuel Subsidies • Fossil fuels continue to dominate policy and practice in both the developed and developing worlds. • Fossil fuel subsidies in developed countries have actually increased post the Paris agreement. • Inefficient fossil fuel subsidies (IFFS) have several impacts – encourage wasteful consumption – distort energy markets – impede investment in clean energy sources, – place a strain on public budgets, and – incentivize unsustainable infrastructure investments.” Average annual national subsidies for fossil fuel production (2013–2014) ($ million) Country Sub-sectors included in the calculation of average annual national Average annual subsidies a (by order of contribution) national subsidies USA Upstream oil and gas; Multiple fossil fuels or unspecified; Coal mining; 20,491 Oil and gas pipelines, power plants and refining; Coal-fired power UK Upstream oil and gas; Multiple fossil fuels or unspecified; Coal mining 9,047 France Oil and gas pipelines, power plants and refining; Multiple fossil fuels or 125 unspecified Germany Coal mining; Multiple fossil fuels or unspecified 2,791 Russia Upstream oil and gas; Oil and gas pipelines, power plants and refining; 22,812 Coal mining China Coal mining; Upstream oil and gas 3,375 Brazil Multiple fossil fuels or unspecified; Oil and gas pipelines; power plants 4,949 and refining; Upstream oil and gas India Coal mining; Multiple fossil fuels or unspecified; Upstream oil and gas; 103 Oil and gas pipelines, power plants and refining; Coal-fired power Multilateral development bank finance for fossil fuels, (average annual 2013 and 2014) Countervailing interests • Civil society has attempted to counter balance the private interests by proposing policies that are responsive to the public agenda of sustainable development. • A major development, particularly in advanced economies, is the trend towards de-privatization and re-municipalization of public utilities such as energy, water, transport and health . • The defining feature of de-privatization initiatives is the recovery of public capacity from corporations. This is significant in that Conclusions • The world will not be able to avoid climate change if countries
Load more

Recommended publications
  • GREEN GROWTH: from RELIGION to REALITY 7 Case Studies on Ambitious Strategies to Shape Green Growth
    GREEN GROWTH: FROM RELIGION TO REALITY 7 case studies on ambitious strategies to shape green growth The Pathways Project and CRESTS Discovering the path to a low-carbon tomorrow Prepared for Green Growth Leaders by: Mark Huberty, Huan Gao, and Juliana Mandell, John Zysman, Nina Kelsey, Jakob Riiskjaer Nygård, Jeremy Pilaar, Andrea Seow, Pilar Fox, Alice Madden with Jany Gao, Kate Goldman, Irene Choi, Crystal Chang and Benjamin Allen © June 2011 The Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy INDEX 1: From Religion to Reality 04 Energy systems transformation for sustainable prosperity 2: An Analytical Overview 18 Seven Green Growth Cases 3: European Union 21 Green Growth as Necessity and Liability 4: Denmark 31 Country Case Analysis 5: United States Federal Green Policy Overview 44 California 50 State Case Analysis Colorado 61 State Case Analysis 6: Korea 67 Country Case Analysis 7: China 75 Country Case Analysis 8: Brazil 85 Country Case Analysis Chapter xxx FROM RELIGION TO REALITY: Energy systems transformation for sustainable prosperity1 John Zysman2 and Mark Huberty3 ©BRIE 1 Earlier versions of this paper were pre- 2 John Zysman is Professor of Political pared for the European Council Informal Science, University of California Berkeley Competitiveness Discussion − Internal and Co-Director, Berkeley Roundtable on Market during the Belgian Presidency the International Economy. Brussels, September 30, 2010; and Green Korea 2010: Strengthening Glo- 3 Mark Huberty is a Ph.D. Candidate in bal Green Growth Strategy: Policy and Political Science at the University of Cali- Cooperation."September 9, Seoul Korea, fornia Berkeley and Graduate Researcher sponsored by the National Research Coun- at the Berkeley Roundtable on the Interna- cil for Economics, Humanities, and Social tional Economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey Results
    UW SUSTAINABILITY ACTION PLAN SURVEY RESULTS Feedback from the UW community April - May 2020 Read the full Plan and other documents at green.uw.edu/plan Page 1 THE SURVEY OVERVIEW These survey results compile feedback from the University of Washington community on the draft version of the UW Sustainability Strategy and proposed Sustainability Action Plan. This feedback is being presented to the Sustainability Plan Executive Committee, the Environmental Stewardship Committee and the Plan Management Team. The information and comments provided was not directly integrated into the Fiscal Year 2021 Action Plan due to deadline constraints. However, these comments will be used to inform the discussions around the Action Plan for FY 2022, as well as to suggest actions which may be taken in FY 2021 outside of the specified action plans. Future planning processes will include surveys and outreach to the UW community earlier in the process to ensure results are considered during the Spring planning phases for the following FY Plans, ensuring more transparency and better adhering to the Sustainability Strategy’s principle of centering equity and inclusion. Page 2 DEMOGRAPHIC RESPONSE The survey for the UW Sustainability Action Plan was open for 30 days from April 22nd to May 22nd. Though the survey was promoted across the three campuses of Seattle, Tacoma and Bothell there was no designation of individual responses by campus. Rather the responses were categorized by the demographic of Faculty, Staff, Student or Alumni. The following table and chart depict the breakdown by demographic category with staff accounting for 52% of responses followed by students with 34%, then faculty with 12% and alumni with 2%.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 115 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 115 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 163 WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 2, 2017 No. 18 House of Representatives The House met at 10 a.m. and was Victims were people from all types of And let me make it clear once again: called to order by the Speaker pro tem- backgrounds. Mr. Speaker, they all had This is not taxpayer funded money. pore (Mr. BOST). something in common. They were a si- Criminals paid for this. Criminals are f lent group of people who were preyed paying the rent on the courthouse and on by criminals. After the crime was they are paying for the system that DESIGNATION OF SPEAKER PRO over, many suffered for years. they have created. TEMPORE Finally, Congress came up with a So what is the problem? The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- novel idea, a law that established the Well, the problem is, Mr. Speaker, fore the House the following commu- Crime Victims Fund to support victims only a fraction of that money is spent nication from the Speaker: of crime. But instead of using taxpayer each year for victims, depriving them WASHINGTON, DC, money for the fund, Congress had a dif- of needed services and that money. February 2, 2017. ferent idea. Why not force the crimi- More money continues to go in the I hereby appoint the Honorable MIKE BOST nals, the traffickers, the abusers, and fund every year because less and less of to act as Speaker pro tempore on this day.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 115 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 115 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 163 WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 2, 2017 No. 18 House of Representatives The House met at 10 a.m. and was Victims were people from all types of And let me make it clear once again: called to order by the Speaker pro tem- backgrounds. Mr. Speaker, they all had This is not taxpayer funded money. pore (Mr. BOST). something in common. They were a si- Criminals paid for this. Criminals are f lent group of people who were preyed paying the rent on the courthouse and on by criminals. After the crime was they are paying for the system that DESIGNATION OF SPEAKER PRO over, many suffered for years. they have created. TEMPORE Finally, Congress came up with a So what is the problem? The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- novel idea, a law that established the Well, the problem is, Mr. Speaker, fore the House the following commu- Crime Victims Fund to support victims only a fraction of that money is spent nication from the Speaker: of crime. But instead of using taxpayer each year for victims, depriving them WASHINGTON, DC, money for the fund, Congress had a dif- of needed services and that money. February 2, 2017. ferent idea. Why not force the crimi- More money continues to go in the I hereby appoint the Honorable MIKE BOST nals, the traffickers, the abusers, and fund every year because less and less of to act as Speaker pro tempore on this day.
    [Show full text]
  • New Archivea
    letters and articles 1989 - 2002 relating to the provenance and presentation of “Contraction & Convergence” GCI’s contribution to realising the objective of the United NationsFramework Convention on Climate Change 1 “It’s not a question of whether, but how much, how soon” John Knaess. Second World Climate Conference Geneva November 1990 2 GCI at the UN in 1996, COP-2 Geneva UN Climate Negotiations April 1997 3 ContentsContentsContents 1989 ............................................................... 12 April 17 - World Rainforest Movement ..................................... 121212 Penang Manifesto .......................................................................................... 12 Call to Action for Forests & their Peoples .......................................................... 12 November 3 - Guardian ........................................................... 141414 Last chance to save the rainforests ................................................................... 14 November 09 - Kilburn Times .................................................. 151515 Green Campaigners deliver letter to P M ......................................................... 15 November 23 – Kilburn Times .................................................. 161616 Annihilation ................................................................................................... 16 1990 ............................................................... 17 January - BBC Wildlifeildlifeildlife .............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Big Oil's Political Reach
    Big Oil’s Political Reach MAPPING FOSSIL FUEL LOBBYING FROM HARPER TO TRUDEAU By Nicolas Graham, William K. Carroll & David Chen NOVEMBER 2019 Big Oil’s Political Reach Mapping fossil fuel lobbying from Harper to Trudeau By Nicolas Graham, William K. Carroll & David Chen November 2019 This report is part of the Corporate Mapping Project (CMP), a research and public engagement initiative investigating the power of the fossil fuel industry. The CMP is jointly led by the University of Victoria, Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives BC and Saskatchewan Offices, and Parkland Institute. This research was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC). For more information, visit www.corporatemapping.ca. PUBLISHING TEAM Lindsey Bertrand, Shannon Daub, Jean Kavanagh, Emira Mears, Terra Poirier Layout: Susan Purtell and Paula Grasdal Copyedit: Nadene Rehnby ISBN 978-1-77125-464-9 This report is available under limited copyright protection. You may download, distribute, photocopy, cite or excerpt this document provided it is properly and fully credited and not used for commercial purposes. 520 – 700 West Pender Street Vancouver, BC V6C 1G8 604.801.5121 | [email protected] www.policyalternatives.ca The CCPA–BC is located on unceded Coast Salish territory, including the lands belonging to the xwməθkwəýəm (Musqueam), Skwxwú7mesh (Squamish) and səÍílwətaʔɬ /Selilwitulh (Tsleil-Waututh) Nations. ABOUT THE AUTHORS NICOLAS GRAHAM recently completed his PhD in the Department of Sociology at the University of Victoria where he is also a sessional instructor. His previous work in the areas of critical political economy and political ecology has appeared in Canadian Review of Sociology, BC Studies and Capitalism Nature Socialism.
    [Show full text]
  • Fossil Fuel Divestment
    Fossil fuel divestment Fossil fuel divestment or fossil fuel divestment and investment in climate solutions is an attempt to reduce climate change by exerting social, political, and economic pressure for the institutional divestment of assets including stocks, bonds, and other financial instruments connected to companies involved in extracting fossil fuels. Fossil fuel divestment campaigns emerged on campuses in the United States in 2010 with students urging their As of 2019, 1,200 institutions possessing 12 trillion [1] administrations to turn endowment investments in dollars divested from the fossil fuel industry. the fossil fuel industry into investments in clean energy and communities most impacted by climate change. By 2015, fossil fuel divestment was reportedly the fastest growing divestment movement in history.[2] By December 2019, a total of 1,200 institutions and over 58,000 individuals representing $12 trillion in assets worldwide had been divested from fossil fuels.[1][3][4] Contents Motivations for divestment Reducing carbon emissions Acting on the Paris Agreement Toronto Principle Lofoten Declaration Economic Stranded assets – the carbon bubble Risk of regulation and carbon pricing Competition from renewable energy sources Unstable fossil fuel prices Effects of divestment Stigmatization of fossil fuel companies Economic risks of divestment from fossil fuels Legal cases Reaction from the fossil-fuel industry Exponential growth into a global divestment movement Groups involved in divestment campaigns Fossil Free ANU 350.org
    [Show full text]
  • Time to Speak the Unspeakable
    Time to speak the unspeakable 1 By Julian Cribb “If you come to a realisation that our civilisation is crumbling in the face of climate chaos, then it opens a vast and challenging agenda. Because it affects all aspects of life.” – Prof. Jem Bendell, ​ ​ ​ University of Cumbria, UK On any given day between 10,000 and 30,000 wildfires now blaze around the planet. Realms as diverse and distant as Siberia, Amazonia, Indonesia, Australia and California are aflame. The advent of the pyrocene – ‘The Age of Fire’ – is among the bleakest warnings yet that humanity ​ ​ has breached boundaries we were never meant to cross and that our tenure on Planet Earth is now in jeopardy. It is time not only to imagine the unimaginable, but to speak it: that the world economy, civilization, and maybe our very survival as a species, are on the line. And that it is past time to act. It isn’t just the fires. It is the incessant knell of other, unnatural (i.e. human-fed) disasters – droughts, floods, vanishing rivers, lakes and glaciers, and the rise in billion-dollar climate-fuelled weather disasters. ​ ​ It is the spate of extinctions, the precipitous decline of sea fish, birds and corals, the disappearance of forests, mammals, frogs, bees and other insects planetwide. It is the remorseless spread of deserts and the baleful waxing of dead zones in the oceans. It is the toxic avalanche of billions of tonnes of human chemical emissions that poison our air, our ​ ​ water, our food, our homes, our cities, our farms and our unborn babies, and which now kills 9 million people a year.
    [Show full text]
  • Conocophillips
    Sign In | Join 0 Join Our IT Network Apply for Opportunities ConocoPhillips Fast Facts Learning List Skills List Share Article Videos Answers ConocoPhillips Co. is an American multinational energy corporation with its headquarters located in the Energy Corridor district of Houston, Texas in the United States. It is the world's largest independent pure-play exploration and production company and is a Fortune 500 company.[2][3] ConocoPhillips was created through the merger of American oil companies Conoco Inc. and Phillips Petroleum Co. on August 30, 2002.[4] In 2012, ConocoPhillips' spun off its downstream assets as a new, and separate company, Phillips 66.[5] History Conoco Inc. was an American oil company founded in 1875 as the Continental Oil and Transportation Co. Based in Ogden, Utah, the company was a coal, oil, kerosene, grease and candles distributor in the West. Marland Oil Co. (founded by exploration pioneer E. W. Marland) later acquired the assets (subject to liabilities) of Continental Oil Co., or DC, merged by Bryan M. Metler, David L. Kinney, and Justin J. Stockburn of Delta Constructors for a consideration of 2,317,266 shares of stock. On June 26, 1899, Marland Oil changed its name to Continental Oil Co. and moved its headquarters to Fargo, North Dakota. The acquisition gave Conoco the red bar-and-triangle logo previously used by Marland. Conoco used the logo between 1930 and 1970, when the current red capsule logo was adopted. The Conoco headquarters were in Ponca City until 1949, when it moved to Houston, Texas. In 2002 Conoco Inc. and Phillips Petroleum Co., whose headquarters were in nearby Bartlesville, Oklahoma merged into ConocoPhillips Numerous state corporation filings are identified "Continental Oil Co." and "Continental Oil Corp." and "Continental Oil Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Convergence Culture Reconsidered for the Humanities
    Taking media scholar Henry Jenkins’s concept of ‘convergence culture’ and the related Claudia Georgi and Brigitte Johanna Glaser (eds.) notions of ‘participatory culture’ and ‘transmedia storytelling’ as points of departure, the essays compiled in the present volume provide terminological clarifi cation, offer exemplary case studies, and discuss the broader implications of such developments Convergence Culture Reconsidered for the humanities. Most of the contributions were originally presented at the transatlantic conference Convergence Culture Reconsidered organized by the editors Media – Participation – Environments at the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Germany, in October 2013. Applying perspectives as diverse as literary, cultural, and media studies, digital humanities, translation studies, art history, musicology, and ecology, they assemble a stimulating wealth of interdisciplinary and innovative approaches that will appeal to students as Göttinger Schriften zur Englischen Philologie well as experts in any of these research areas. Band 9 2015 Georgi / Glaser (eds.) Convergence Culture Reconsidered Glaser (eds.) Convergence / Georgi ISBN: 978-3-86395-217-4 ISSN: 1868-3878 Universitätsdrucke Göttingen Universitätsdrucke Göttingen Claudia Georgi and Brigitte Johanna Glaser (eds.) Convergence Culture Reconsidered Dieses Werk ist lizenziert unter einer Creative Commons Namensnennung - Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 4.0 International Lizenz. erschienen als Band 9 in der Reihe „Göttinger Schriften zur Englischen Philologie“ in den Universitätsdrucken im Universitätsverlag Göttingen 2015 Claudia Georgi and Brigitte Johanna Glaser (eds.) Convergence Culture Reconsidered Media – Participation – Environments Göttinger Schriften zur Englischen Philologie, Band 9 Universitätsverlag Göttingen 2015 Bibliographische Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliographie; detaillierte bibliographische Daten sind im Internet über <http://dnb.dnb.de> abrufbar.
    [Show full text]
  • Senate the Senate Met at 11 A.M
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 115 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 163 WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 2, 2017 No. 18 Senate The Senate met at 11 a.m. and was Mr. SULLIVAN thereupon assumed of President Obama’s two first-term called to order by the Honorable DAN the Chair as Acting President pro tem- Supreme Court nominees. Did not. We SULLIVAN, a Senator from the State of pore. thank the Democratic leader for clear- Alaska. f ing that up. His statement also re- f minds us that both of the Supreme RESERVATION OF LEADER TIME Court Justices President Clinton nomi- PRAYER The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem- nated got straight up-or-down votes as The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- pore. Under the previous order, the well. There is no reason someone like fered the following prayer: leadership time is reserved. Judge Gorsuch, who has received wide- Let us pray. spread acclaim from both sides of the O God, who remains the same when f aisle, should be treated differently all else fades, thank You for loving and now. using us for Your glory. RECOGNITION OF THE MAJORITY Guide our Senators in the footsteps LEADER When he was nominated to his cur- rent seat on the court of appeals, Judge of those who were willing to risk all for The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem- Gorsuch received the American Bar As- freedom, who transformed dark yester- pore. The majority leader is recog- sociation’s highest possible rating— days into bright tomorrows.
    [Show full text]
  • For a Sustainable Future Population Matters Magazine - Issue 26
    ISSN 2053-0412 (Print) for a ISSN 2053-0420 (Online) sustainable future Population Matters Magazine Issue 26 February 2015 The Beaver Lake Cree Nation Trees and family planning: a unique combination? Population growth and the British planning system Population Matters Magazine - Issue 26 Contents From the Chief Executive 3 Magazine Population Matters news 4 This magazine is printed using vegetable-based inks on 100% recycled paper. If you are willing to Population groups elsewhere 8 receive the magazine by email, which reduces our costs and helps the environment, please contact The Beaver Lake Cree Nation 9 the administrator using the contact details below. Additional copies are available on request; a donation is Trees and family planning: a unique combination 11 appreciated. Population Matters does not necessarily endorse contributions nor guarantee their accuracy. Population growth and the British planning system 12 Interested parties are invited to submit, ideally by email, material to be considered for inclusion, On migration 13 including articles, reviews and letters. Subjects may include the causes and consequences of, and cures Obituaries 14 for, unsustainable human population and consumption levels. Submissions should be in Word or equivalent Reviews 16 and be accompanied by a brief description of the writer. Publication titles should be shown in italics Letters 18 and a single space used after full-stops. Copy deadlines are the end of June and December and a maximum of 700 words per contribution is suggested. Submissions may be edited and the editor’s decision is final. Please note that it may not be possible to include all submissions.
    [Show full text]