Diplopoda — Nervous and Neuroendocrine Systems

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Diplopoda — Nervous and Neuroendocrine Systems CHAPTER 8 DIPLOPODA — NERVOUS AND NEUROENDOCRINE SYSTEMS BY ANDY SOMBKE AND JÖRG ROSENBERG NERVOUS SYSTEM No detailed and comparative analysis of the diplopod nervous system is currently avail- able and our present knowledge of the anatomy is anything but complete. The first de- scriptions were given by Treviranus & Treviranus (1817), Newport (1843), and Owen (1855). Detailed anatomical information were firstly given by Saint-Remy (1890), Holm- gren (1916) and Hanström (1928). Sahli (1966) described in detail the nervous system of representatives of the Julida. In parallel, Seifert (1966) provided a comparative overview on the nervous system of representatives of Penicillata, Chordeumatida, Glomerida, Julida, and Spirostreptida. In mandibulate arthropods, the nervous system can be separated into a central nervous system, composed of brain and ventral nerve cord, and a peripheral nervous system. The brain is a syncerebrum formed by the close association as well as structural and functional transformation of segmental ganglia (Richter et al., 2010; Loesel et al., 2013). Thus, the brain is tripartite and composed of the neuromeres proto-, deuto-, and tritocerebrum. Each neuromere is usually compartmentalized to some degree into definable clusters of neurons in the periphery that surround central neuropils (Richter et al., 2010). In the Myriapoda, the neuraxis (the axis of the nervous system) of the brain is commonly arcuated along the anterior-posterior body axis resulting in a dorsal or even posteriodorsal position of the protocerebrum (Fahlander, 1938; Sombke et al., 2012). Brain neuromeres are not separated by clear borders, but can be distinguished externally by their associated nerves. The neurilemma is thin and composed of two parts: an internal perilemma and an external neural lamella (Joly & Descamps, 1984). The perilemma is composed of different cells types including glial cells. In Gymnostreptus olivaceus, Francicso et al. (2015) described an additional external discontinuous and irregular cell sheath whose function appears to be linked to nutrition and protection. © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2015 Myriapoda 2 (8): 161-179 162 A. SOMBKE & J. ROSENBERG Protocerebrum The protocerebrum is the largest part of the brain (Fig. 8.1A-D). It consists of the frontal lobes and extends laterally to include the optic lobes (missing in blind species). Diplopoda possess two optic neuropils commonly termed lamina and medulla (e.g. Holmgren, 1916; Hanström, 1928; Francisco et al., 2015; Sombke & Harzsch, 2015). The second-order optic neuropil (medulla) is also termed ‘visual tectum’ because it matches the characteristics of the hexapod lobula plate (Strausfeld, 2005). In Orthoporus ornatus, Strausfeld (2012) described that photoreceptor axons project into a single planar lamina, from which relays extend centrally to target a group of spindle-shaped neuropils via uncrossed axons. However, older descriptions of ‘Julus sp.’ (e.g., Hanström, 1928) mention a layered arrangement of this second-order optic neuropil. The mediodorsal part of the protocerebrum is termed pars intercerebralis (Holmgren, 1916). In ‘Julus sp.’, Holmgren (1916) distinguished three globuli (I-III) associated with the mushroom bodies that correspond to the ‘masse ganglionnaire antérieur’ and the two ‘masses ganglionnaire externe et interne’ of Saint-Remy (1890). The globuli are accumulations of small neurons poor of cytoplasm termed globuli- or Kenyon cells. Globulus II corresponds to the corpora pedunculata of Hexapoda (Saint-Remy, 1890). According to Sahli (1966), all three globuli belong to the protocerebrum. In general, arthropod mushroom bodies are centers for sensory integration and memory formation, and represent the neuronal basis for associative and flexible behaviors (Loesel et al., 2013). The most prominent input originates in the olfactory lobes through the projection neuron tract which in diplopods was only described for ‘Julus sp.’ (Holmgren, 1916) and Orthoporus ornatus (Strausfeld et al., 1995; Strausfeld, 2012). Dendritic arborizations of globuli cells form calyces or stalked glomeruli (‘Stielglomeruli’ sensu Hanström, 1928), axons provide a system of parallel fibers called pedunculi or stalks (‘Stiele’ sensu Holmgren, 1916). In Orthoporus ornatus, Strausfeld (2012) depicted microglomeruli that conjoin the mushroom bodies. A short pedunculus extends laterally, dividing into several parallel lobes and reaching the midline but not crossing it (Strausfeld et al., 1995). Another pedunculus crosses the midline forming a contralateral connection (Strausfeld, 2012). In addition, medial (or median) bodies occur (Holmgren, 1916; Horridge, 1965; Sombke & Rosenberg, in press) (Fig. 8.2C). Here, axons converge and thus establish a contralateral connection of the pedunculi. Histologically, Sahli (1966) described intracerebral structures (‘îlot intra-globulaire’ or ‘organes intra-globulaires’) in Julida, Polydesmida and Nematophora situated anterior-dorsal within globulus I. Similar structures (‘organes neuraux’) were described by Juberthie-Jupeau (1967a) within globulus I of different species of Glomerida (Glomeridae, incl. Trachysphaera; Glomeridellidae), and by Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin (1974) in Polyxenus lagurus. Jamault-Navarro (1992) interpreted such structures as intracerebral sensory structures (‘structures sensorielles intracérébrales’). An unpaired midline neuropil or central body, common in arthropods, seems to be absent (Loesel et al., 2002) or ‘insignificant’ (Holmgren, 1916; Hanström, 1928) in Diplopoda (compare Fig. 8.2C). According to Holmgren (1916) it is completely embedded in fibers. Strausfeld (2012) interpreted this reduction as expressing a redundant function of leg motor circuits;.
Recommended publications
  • Millipedes (Diplopoda) from Caves of Portugal
    A.S.P.S. Reboleira and H. Enghoff – Millipedes (Diplopoda) from caves of Portugal. Journal of Cave and Karst Studies, v. 76, no. 1, p. 20–25. DOI: 10.4311/2013LSC0113 MILLIPEDES (DIPLOPODA) FROM CAVES OF PORTUGAL ANA SOFIA P.S. REBOLEIRA1 AND HENRIK ENGHOFF2 Abstract: Millipedes play an important role in the decomposition of organic matter in the subterranean environment. Despite the existence of several cave-adapted species of millipedes in adjacent geographic areas, their study has been largely ignored in Portugal. Over the last decade, intense fieldwork in caves of the mainland and the island of Madeira has provided new data about the distribution and diversity of millipedes. A review of millipedes from caves of Portugal is presented, listing fourteen species belonging to eight families, among which six species are considered troglobionts. The distribution of millipedes in caves of Portugal is discussed and compared with the troglobiont biodiversity in the overall Iberian Peninsula and the Macaronesian archipelagos. INTRODUCTION All specimens from mainland Portugal were collected by A.S.P.S. Reboleira, while collectors of Madeiran speci- Millipedes play an important role in the decomposition mens are identified in the text. Material is deposited in the of organic matter, and several species around the world following collections: Zoological Museum of University of have adapted to subterranean life, being found from cave Copenhagen, Department of Animal Biology, University of entrances to almost 2000 meters depth (Culver and Shear, La Laguna, Spain and in the collection of Sofia Reboleira, 2012; Golovatch and Kime, 2009; Sendra and Reboleira, Portugal. 2012). Although the millipede faunas of many European Species were classified according to their degree of countries are relatively well studied, this is not true of dependence on the subterranean environment, following Portugal.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrative Revision of the Giant Pill-Millipede Genus Sphaeromimus
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 414: 67–107 (2014) New Sphaeromimus species from Madagascar 67 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.414.7730 RESEARCH ARTICLE www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Integrative revision of the giant pill-millipede genus Sphaeromimus from Madagascar, with the description of seven new species (Diplopoda, Sphaerotheriida, Arthrosphaeridae) Thomas Wesener1,2,†, Daniel Minh-Tu Le1,3,‡, Stephanie F. Loria1,4,§ 1 Field Museum of Natural History, Zoology - Insects, 1400 S. Lake Shore Drive, 60605 Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A. 2 Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Leibniz Institute for Animal Biodiversity, Center for Taxonomy and Evolutionary Research (Section Myriapoda), Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany 3 School of the Art Institute of Chicago, 36 S. Wabash Avenue, 60603 Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A. 4 American Museum of Natural History, Richard Glider Graduate School, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, U.S.A. † http://zoobank.org/86DEA7CD-988C-43EC-B9D6-C51000595B47 ‡ http://zoobank.org/AD76167C-3755-4803-AEB5-4CD9A7CB820A § http://zoobank.org/ED92B15A-10F9-47B8-A8FA-D7673007F8A5 Corresponding author: Thomas Wesener ([email protected]) Academic editor: D.V. Spiegel | Received 15 April 2014 | Accepted 8 May 2014 | Published 6 June 2014 http://zoobank.org/59FA2886-34C2-4AEF-9783-3347E5EBC702 Citation: Wesener T, Le DM-T, Loria SF (2014) Integrative revision of the giant pill-millipede genus Sphaeromimus from Madagascar, with the description of seven new species (Diplopoda, Sphaerotheriida, Arthrosphaeridae). ZooKeys 414: 67–107. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.414.7730 Abstract The Malagasy giant pill-millipede genusSphaeromimus de Saussure & Zehntner, 1902 is revised. Seven new species, S.
    [Show full text]
  • Supra-Familial Taxon Names of the Diplopoda Table 4A
    Milli-PEET, Taxonomy Table 4 Page - 1 - Table 4: Supra-familial taxon names of the Diplopoda Table 4a: List of current supra-familial taxon names in alphabetical order, with their old invalid counterpart and included orders. [Brackets] indicate that the taxon group circumscribed by the old taxon group name is not recognized in Shelley's 2003 classification. Current Name Old Taxon Name Order Brannerioidea in part Trachyzona Verhoeff, 1913 Chordeumatida Callipodida Lysiopetalida Chamberlin, 1943 Callipodida [Cambaloidea+Spirobolida+ Chorizognatha Verhoeff, 1910 Cambaloidea+Spirobolida+ Spirostreptida] Spirostreptida Chelodesmidea Leptodesmidi Brölemann, 1916 Polydesmida Chelodesmidea Sphaeriodesmidea Jeekel, 1971 Polydesmida Chordeumatida Ascospermophora Verhoeff, 1900 Chordeumatida Chordeumatida Craspedosomatida Jeekel, 1971 Chordeumatida Chordeumatidea Craspedsomatoidea Cook, 1895 Chordeumatida Chordeumatoidea Megasacophora Verhoeff, 1929 Chordeumatida Craspedosomatoidea Cheiritophora Verhoeff, 1929 Chordeumatida Diplomaragnoidea Ancestreumatoidea Golovatch, 1977 Chordeumatida Glomerida Plesiocerata Verhoeff, 1910 Glomerida Hasseoidea Orobainosomidi Brolemann, 1935 Chordeumatida Hasseoidea Protopoda Verhoeff, 1929 Chordeumatida Helminthomorpha Proterandria Verhoeff, 1894 all helminthomorph orders Heterochordeumatoidea Oedomopoda Verhoeff, 1929 Chordeumatida Julida Symphyognatha Verhoeff, 1910 Julida Julida Zygocheta Cook, 1895 Julida [Julida+Spirostreptida] Diplocheta Cook, 1895 Julida+Spirostreptida [Julida in part[ Arthrophora Verhoeff,
    [Show full text]
  • Diplopoda, Polyxenida, Lophoproctidae) Extend the Range of the Genus Lophoproctus
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 510: 209–222 (2015) New records of Lophoproctus coecus Pocock, 1894... 209 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.510.8668 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research New records of Lophoproctus coecus Pocock, 1894 (Diplopoda, Polyxenida, Lophoproctidae) extend the range of the genus Lophoproctus Megan Short1 1 Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Melbourne, Australia Corresponding author: Megan Short ([email protected]) Academic editor: Ivan H. Tuf | Received 29 September 2014 | Accepted 5 May 2015 | Published 30 June 2015 http://zoobank.org/4FF544AC-67B8-413A-A544-38A3F299FCF1 Citation: Short M (2015) New records of Lophoproctus coecus Pocock, 1894 (Diplopoda, Polyxenida, Lophoproctidae) extend the range of the genus Lophoproctus. In: Tuf IH, Tajovský K (Eds) Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Myriapodology, Olomouc, Czech Republic. ZooKeys 510: 209–222. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.510.8668 Abstract The geographic distribution of the genus Lophoproctus Pocock, 1894 has greatly expanded with new re- cords of the species Lophoproctus coecus Pocock, 1894, together with the reassignment of a number of millipedes formerly identified as Lophoproctus lucidus (Chalande, 1888). L. coecus was found to be the sole representative of the family Lophoproctidae in collections examined from Crimea and the Caucasian region. The species was also identified from Iran and Kyrgyzstan.Lophoproctus specimens collected in Italy by Verhoeff were reassigned as L. coecus with the exception of one specimen of L. jeanneli (Brölemann, 1910) from Capri. These data were combined with all available information from the literature to look at the pattern of distribution of the four species in the genus.
    [Show full text]
  • Nervous Tissue
    Nervous Tissue • Controls and integrates all body activities within limits that maintain life • Three basic functions – sensing changes with sensory receptors • fullness of stomach or sun on your face – interpreting and remembering those changes – reacting to those changes with effectors • muscular contractions • glandular secretions Major Structures of the Nervous System • Brain, cranial nerves, spinal cord, spinal nerves, ganglia, enteric plexuses and sensory receptors Organization of the Nervous System • CNS is brain and spinal cord • PNS is everything else Nervous System Divisions • Central nervous system (CNS) – consists of the brain and spinal cord • Peripheral nervous system (PNS) – consists of cranial and spinal nerves that contain both sensory and motor fibers – connects CNS to muscles, glands & all sensory receptors Subdivisions of the PNS • Somatic (voluntary) nervous system (SNS) – neurons from cutaneous and special sensory receptors to the CNS – motor neurons to skeletal muscle tissue • Autonomic (involuntary) nervous systems – sensory neurons from visceral organs to CNS – motor neurons to smooth & cardiac muscle and glands • sympathetic division (speeds up heart rate) • parasympathetic division (slow down heart rate) • Enteric nervous system (ENS) – involuntary sensory & motor neurons control GI tract – neurons function independently of ANS & CNS Neurons • Functional unit of nervous system • Have capacity to produce action potentials – electrical excitability • Cell body – single nucleus with prominent nucleolus – Nissl
    [Show full text]
  • The Nervous System
    The Nervous System • A network of billions of nerve cells linked together in a highly organized fashion to form the rapid control center of the body. • Functions include: – Integrating center for homeostasis, movement, and almost all other body functions. – The mysterious source of those traits that we think of as setting humans apart from animals Basic Functions of the Nervous System 1. Sensation • Monitors changes/events occurring in and outside the body. Such changes are known as stimuli and the cells that monitor them are receptors. 2. Integration • The parallel processing and interpretation of sensory information to determine the appropriate response 3. Reaction • Motor output. – The activation of muscles or glands (typically via the release of neurotransmitters (NTs)) Organization of the Nervous System • 2 big initial divisions: 1. Central Nervous System • The brain + the spinal cord – The center of integration and control 2. Peripheral Nervous System • The nervous system outside of the brain and spinal cord • Consists of: – 31 Spinal nerves » Carry info to and from the spinal cord – 12 Cranial nerves » Carry info to and from the brain Peripheral Nervous System • Responsible for communication btwn the CNS and the rest of the body. • Can be divided into: – Sensory Division • Afferent division – Conducts impulses from receptors to the CNS – Informs the CNS of the state of the body interior and exterior – Sensory nerve fibers can be somatic (from skin, skeletal muscles or joints) or visceral (from organs w/i the ventral body cavity) – Motor Division • Efferent division – Conducts impulses from CNS to effectors (muscles/glands) – Motor nerve fibers Motor Efferent Division • Can be divided further: – Somatic nervous system • VOLUNTARY (generally) • Somatic nerve fibers that conduct impulses from the CNS to skeletal muscles – Autonomic nervous system • INVOLUNTARY (generally) • Conducts impulses from the CNS to smooth muscle, cardiac muscle, and glands.
    [Show full text]
  • MYRIAPODS 767 Volume 2 (M-Z), Pp
    In: R. Singer, (ed.), 1999. Encyclopedia of Paleontology, MYRIAPODS 767 volume 2 (M-Z), pp. 767-775. Fitzroy Dearborn, London. MYRIAPODS JVlyriapods are many-legged, terrestrial arthropods whose bodies groups, the Trilobita, Chelicerata, Crustacea, and the Uniramia, the are divided into two major parts, a head and a trunk. The head last consisting of the Myriapoda, Hexapoda, and Onychophora (vel- bears a single pair of antennae, highly differentiated mandibles (or vet worms). However, subsequent structural and molecular evidence jaws), and at least one pair of maxillary mouthparts; the trunk indicates that there are several characters uniting major arthropod region consists of similar "metameres," each of which is a func- taxa. Moreover, paleobiologic, embryologie, and other evidence tional segment that bears one or two pairs of appendages. Gas demonstrates that myriapods and hexapods are fiindamentally exchange is accomplished by tracheae•a branching network of polyramous, having two major articulating appendages per embry- specialized tubules•although small forms respire through the ological body segment, like other arthropods. body wall. Malpighian organs are used for excretion, and eyes con- A fourth proposal (Figure ID) suggests that myriapods are sist of clusters of simple, unintegrated, light-sensitive elements an ancient, basal arthropod lineage, and that the Hexapoda that are termed ommatidia. These major features collectively char- emerged as an independent, relatively recent clade from a rather acterize the five major myriapod clades: Diplopoda (millipeds), terminal crustacean lineage, perhaps the Malacostraca, which con- Chilopoda (centipeds), Pauropoda (pauropods), Symphyla (sym- tains lobsters and crabs (Ballard et al. 1992). Because few crusta- phylans), and Arthropleurida (arthropleurids). Other features cean taxa were examined in this analysis, and due to the Cambrian indicate differences among these clades.
    [Show full text]
  • Clé D'identification Des Glomerida(1) De France
    Clé d’identification des Glomerida(1) de France Robin Duborget 2017 ( Version 2 ) (1) : exceptées les espèces cavernicoles Avant-Propos Les Gloméris sont des Arthropodes largement méconnus d’une majorité des naturalistes et entomo- logistes amateurs. Ce manque d’intérêt provient d’un manque certain d’outils de détermination simples, facilement disponibles et accessibles. En effet, hors de la sphère professionnelle il n’y a que peu d’informa- tions pratiques et applicables sur le terrain permettant de déterminer un Gloméris. C’est dans le but de pallier à cette lacune que j’ai decidé de réaliser cette clé de détermination illustrée. Celle-ci comprend pour l’instant la totalité des espèces françaises non cavernicoles de l’ordre des Glome- rida, avec des photographies personnelles et des critères de détermination simples et visibles extérieure- ment. La répartition des Gloméris français est actuellement peu connue, aussi ces données, comme le nombre d’espèces présentes dans la clé, sont amenées à évoluer. Cette clé, bien que sans prétention, n’est pourtant pas exempte de rigueur. En effet, elle n’aurait pu voir le jour sans le travail d’Oliver Macek qui a identifié mes spécimens à l’aide des techniques génétiques de «codes-barres moléculaires». Ainsi, j’ai entrepris de corréler à chaque détermination par «barcoding» un ou plusieurs caractères morphologiques externes, permettant de séparer l’espèce identifiée des autres. Il est apparu alors qu’on pouvait, du moins en se limitant à la zone géographique de la France, faire une relation entre certains caractères externes et une espèce de Gloméris. Cela permettant de réaliser une clé de détermination à destination des naturalistes désirant identifier leurs trouvailles.
    [Show full text]
  • Nervous Tissue
    Nervous Tissue • Controls and integrates all body activities within limits that maintain life • Three basic functions – sensing changes with sensory receptors • fullness of stomach or sun on your face – interpreting and remembering those changes – reacting to those changes with effectors • muscular contractions • glandular secretions 12-1 Major Structures of the Nervous System • Brain, cranial nerves, spinal cord, spinal nerves, ganglia, enteric plexuses and sensory receptors 12-2 Organization of the Nervous System • CNS is brain and spinal cord • PNS is everything else 12-3 Nervous System Divisions • Central nervous system (CNS) – consists of the brain and spinal cord • Peripheral nervous system (PNS) – consists of cranial and spinal nerves that contain both sensory and motor fibers – connects CNS to muscles, glands & all sensory receptors 12-4 Subdivisions of the PNS • Somatic (voluntary) nervous system (SNS) – neurons from cutaneous and special sensory receptors to the CNS – motor neurons to skeletal muscle tissue • Autonomic (involuntary) nervous systems – sensory neurons from visceral organs to CNS – motor neurons to smooth & cardiac muscle and glands • sympathetic division (speeds up heart rate) • parasympathetic division (slow down heart rate) • Enteric nervous system (ENS) – involuntary sensory & motor neurons control GI tract – neurons function independently of ANS & CNS 12-5 Neurons • Functional unit of nervous system • Have capacity to produce action potentials – electrical excitability • Cell body • Cell processes = dendrites
    [Show full text]
  • Zootaxa 2725: 28–40 (2010) ISSN 1175-5326 (Print Edition) Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2010 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (Online Edition)
    Zootaxa 2725: 28–40 (2010) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2010 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Revision of the American Pill Millipedes I: Onomeris and Trichomeris (Diplopoda, Glomerida, Glomeridae) THOMAS WESENER1 Field Museum of Natural History, Zoology - Insects, 1400 S. Lake Shore Drive, 60605 Chicago, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] 1Current Address: Forschungsmuseum Koenig, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany Abstract The unique characters which distinguish Trichomeris Loomis, 1943 from Onomeris Cook, 1896 are based on erroneous drawings and not actual differences. Trichomeris is a junior synonym of Onomeris. All three species of Onomeris, O. sin- uata (Loomis), 1943, O. underwoodi Cook, 1896 and O. australora Hoffman, 1950 are redescribed, based on their holo- types, as well as additional specimens. Scanning electron micrographs are presented for the first time for an American member of the order Glomerida. A key to the three species of Onomeris is provided. The available distribution data for Onomeris is still rudimentary, but the distribution areas of the three species are Cumberland Plateau from NW Alabama to Virginia for O. sinuata n. comb., lowland areas from Mississippi to Georgia for O. underwoodi, mountainous areas of Tennessee, Georgia and North Carolina for O. australora. Additional Onomeris species can potentially be discovered in the eastern United States. Key words: Glomerida, soil arthropod, Cumberland Plateau, microendemism, systematics Introduction The pill millipedes (order Glomerida) belong to the millipede subclass Pentazonia (Bond & Sierwald 2007) and encompass currently approximately 282 species organized in 34 genera (see Table 1). Pill millipedes are usually 10–20 mm long and can roll into a perfect ball as defense behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • ÖDÖN TÖMÖSVÁRY (1852-1884), PIONEER of HUNGARIAN MYRIAPODOLOGY Zoltán Korsós Department of Zoology, Hungarian Natural
    miriapod report 20/1/04 10:04 am Page 78 BULLETIN OF THE BRITISH MYRIAPOD AND ISOPOD GROUP Volume 19 2003 ÖDÖN TÖMÖSVÁRY (1852-1884), PIONEER OF HUNGARIAN MYRIAPODOLOGY Zoltán Korsós Department of Zoology, Hungarian Natural History Museum, Baross u. 13, H-1088 Budapest, Hungary E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Ödön (=Edmund) Tömösváry (1852-1884) immortalised his name in the science of myriapodology by discovering the peculiar sensory organs of the myriapods. He first described these organs in 1883 on selected species of Chilopoda, Diplopoda and Pauropoda. On the occasion of the 150th anniversary of Tömösváry’s birth, his unfortunately short though productive scientific career is overviewed, in this paper only from the myriapodological point of view. A list of the 32 new species and two new genera described by him are given and commented, together with a detailed bibliography of Tömösváry’s 24 myriapodological works and subsequent papers dealing with his taxa. INTRODUCTION Ödön Tömösváry is certainly one of the Hungarian zoologists (if not the only one) whose name is well- known worldwide. This is due to the discovery of a peculiar sensory organ which was later named after him, and it is called Tömösváry’s organ uniformly in almost all languages (French: organ de Tömösváry, German: Tömösvárysche Organ, Danish: Tömösvarys organ, Italian: organo di Tömösváry, Czech: Tömösváryho organ and Hungarian: Tömösváry-féle szerv). The organ itself is believed to be a sensory organ with some kind of chemical or olfactory function (Hopkin & Read 1992). However, although its structure was studied in many respects (Bedini & Mirolli 1967, Haupt 1971, 1973, 1979, Hennings 1904, 1906, Tichy 1972, 1973, Figures 4-6), the physiological background is still not clear today.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Aspects of the Ecology of Millipedes (Diplopoda) Thesis
    Some Aspects of the Ecology of Millipedes (Diplopoda) Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Monica A. Farfan, B.S. Graduate Program in Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology The Ohio State University 2010 Thesis Committee: Hans Klompen, Advisor John W. Wenzel Andrew Michel Copyright by Monica A. Farfan 2010 Abstract The focus of this thesis is the ecology of invasive millipedes (Diplopoda) in the family Julidae. This particular group of millipedes are thought to be introduced into North America from Europe and are now widely found in many urban, anthropogenic habitats in the U.S. Why are these animals such effective colonizers and why do they seem to be mostly present in anthropogenic habitats? In a review of the literature addressing the role of millipedes in nutrient cycling, the interactions of millipedes and communities of fungi and bacteria are discussed. The presence of millipedes stimulates fungal growth while fungal hyphae and bacteria positively effect feeding intensity and nutrient assimilation efficiency in millipedes. Millipedes may also utilize enzymes from these organisms. In a continuation of the study of the ecology of the family Julidae, a comparative study was completed on mites associated with millipedes in the family Julidae in eastern North America and the United Kingdom. The goals of this study were: 1. To establish what mites are present on these millipedes in North America 2. To see if this fauna is the same as in Europe 3. To examine host association patterns looking specifically for host or habitat specificity.
    [Show full text]