DOCSLIB.ORG

IBSA Six Years On: Co-Operation in a RECOMMENDATIONS New Global Order • Collaboration Development Efforts Should Be IBSA’S (India–Brazil–South Africa) Core Priority

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
IBSA Six Years On: Co-Operation in a RECOMMENDATIONS New Global Order • Collaboration Development Efforts Should Be IBSA’S (India–Brazil–South Africa) Core Priority POLICY BRIEFING 8 Emerging Powers Programme November 2009 IBSA Six Years On: Co-operation in a RECOMMENDATIONS New Global Order • Collaboration development efforts should be IBSA’s (India–Brazil–South Africa) core priority. Galvanising Lyal White1 development orientation ahead of such issues as global economic governance — better covered by groupings like BRIC (Brazil–Russia–India–China) — EXECUTIVE SUMMARY will avoid clouding its priorities. ix years after its launch, offi cials can no longer claim that the • IBSA should focus on improving India–Brazil–South Africa (IBSA) Forum is still in its infancy. coherence between inter-governmental S It is time to evaluate results and missed opportunities to provide a working groups and non-government balanced assessment. forums with regular exchanges In the wake of an international fi nancial crisis and a changing global throughout the year between annual architecture, its original raison d’être — multilateral system reforms, IBSA summits. stronger coalitions of the South and development co-operation — is • The development fund needs to more pertinent than ever. Critics question its achievements and the be expanded. This should become merits of a coalition of emerging powers that excludes notables like IBSA’s flagship and its interface with China. But others insist it has facilitated dialogue and exchange at a the developing world. Emerging level and frequency previously unimaginable. donor functions, currently carried out Certainly, IBSA is a recognised and powerful coalition that enjoys bilaterally, can be incorporated into an a strong consensus among members. Efforts to improve co-operation enlarged IBSA development fund. for development has become a core niche that could ultimately • Efforts should be directed to become the driving force behind IBSA and reconfi gure its role in trade facilitation, not overarching the developing world, Africa in particular. This distinguishes it from trade agreements. Better connectivity, other emerging coalitions, making it an example of development removal of double taxation, visa co-operation in a new global order. exemption and homogenous business practices are more urgent than an INTRODUCTION IBSA-wide free trade agreement. IBSA was launched in Brasilia in June 2003. Hailed as an alliance • IBSA and BRIC can and should of like-minded democracies from the developing South, member co-exist. Each performs a different countries wanted a loose arrangement without a fi xed secretariat but function and has an important global with an ambitious agenda focused on global governance and inter- role. Open dialogue should exist — sectoral co-operation. especially when it comes to systemic Now, after six years, and about to hold its fourth summit, IBSA is reforms and a collective position, no longer in its ‘infancy’. With the global economy at a precipice and including Africa. emerging powers playing an increasing part in agenda setting, its role AFRICAN INSIGHTS. GLOBAL PERSPECTIVES. IBSA SIX YEARS ON: CO-OPERATION IN A NEW GLOBAL ORDER can be more relevant than ever. America and a driving force for multilateral Offi cials from all three countries insist it has decision-making. Co-ordination is most evident achieved much in a short time: encouraging at the United Nations, where there is a 96% active dialogue among members, promoting vote convergence among IBSA countries and co-operation in key ministries and adding its the reform of global institutions, especially the collective weight in multilateral forums. Security Council, has always been a priority. But critics argue that progress has been slow While strategies for achieving permanent seats and that results fall far short of initial lofty for IBSA members vary, demands for reform and ambitions. One observer describes IBSA as little representation do not. more than a ‘gathering of friends’. Economic realities hamper market Some suggest that members themselves convergence. Trade among the three countries has differ on their perceptions of its role. India and increased impressively from $3.9 billion in 2003 Brazil are emerging economic powers that wield to just over $10 billion in 2008. But compared to enormous influence unilaterally, while South trade between China and Brazil — $43 billion in Africa benefi ts from being part of a heavyweight 2008 — it is still small. collective that bolsters its global infl uence. For Bureaucrats working on IBSA concede Brazil, IBSA forms part of a southern development that market integration is a pipe dream. strategy that cuts across government ministries. Insurmountable regional constraints pre-date India maintains a low profi le, using IBSA to drive the alliance. A trilateral agreement would have its multilateral agenda and generate credibility on to include other regional partners, the Southern its nuclear aspirations. African Customs Union and the Common Market The rise of Brazil-Russia-India-China (BRIC) of the South (Mercosur) in particular, which as a coalition of emerging powers in the face of would ensure an endless negotiating battle. A divergent interests and interpretations around more realistic goal might be an arrangement that IBSA also brings to the fore a number of questions simply declares existing agreements between the vis-a-vis IBSA and emerging power coalitions in regional blocs to fall under an IBSA umbrella. But general. this would be more symbolic than coherent trade Given global developments and the divergent integration.2 views on IBSA, it is important to evaluate progress Facilitating trade through improved in the global arena and its future as a forum for connectivity and harmonised policies would be a dialogue and action. more pertinent and achievable target. IBSA has 17 government-to-government TAKING STOCK SIX YEARS ON working groups that exchange knowledge and experience regularly — a practical approach to IBSA has signifi cantly improved relations among trilateral development co-operation. And there India, Brazil and South Africa. It is a platform are seven people-to-people forums which meet for dialogue and exchange between ministries at annual summits to encourage non-government and non-government entities. More importantly, relations. it has created a common culture of constructive The working groups have had mixed results. co-operation. Science and technology seem to be leading the Its greatest achievement to date is in political way with joint initiatives including a research co-ordination, something that previously was, at trip to Antarctica. They also share technology best, impulsive. One Brazilian academic describes on biofuels, a cross-cutting issue that affects Brazil’s South–South agenda in previous decades other important working groups, for example on as non-committal. The country ‘talked-the-talk’ climate change and energy. but never really ‘signed up or paid the price’. In revenue services, Brazil has established a Today it is arguably the most active partner, with special unit, based on the South African model, to development projects across Africa and Latin deal specifi cally with large taxpayers, while South SAIIA POLICY BRIEFING 8 2 IBSA SIX YEARS ON: CO-OPERATION IN A NEW GLOBAL ORDER Africa and India explore the IT technology that REALISING DEVELOPMENT has helped Brazil improve revenue collection and PRIORITIES effi ciency. The business forums have yielded impressive IBSA has always maintained a strong focus results. Where there was little or no formal on development. Shortly after its creation it dialogue before, business has now become an characterised itself as a forum for ‘economic active and visible gathering on the sidelines development and social equity’.3 This description at IBSA summits. The small business forum is covered the many challenges facing each country creating a database of all small and medium while expressing a broader intention to improve businesses in all three countries. development and integration in Africa, Asia and But outside of government and even within Latin America. certain ministries, criticism of IBSA and its Brazil has been a particularly strong proponent working groups is unanimous: these groups have of development, embracing co-operation as a proved more complicated than expected. Results foreign policy priority. As an ‘emerging provider’ have been slow in coming and there is a need for (not just an emerging power), it is eager to share greater coherence and focus. knowledge with less developed countries. Paulo Sotero, director of the Brazil Institute at the DEVELOPMENT FUND SUCCESS Woodrow Wilson Center in Washington, describes this as a ‘spirit of genuine solidarity ... a social and The IBSA development fund has become an political — rather than economic — motivation in unexpected success story. By applying a simple, Brazilian international co-operation initiatives’.4 effective approach to developmental assistance, it Brazilians have started calling this innovative has delivered positive results relatively quickly. blend of social assistance and technical support With a small annual contribution of $1 million ‘social technology’. Africa is clearly a priority a member, the fund is administered by the United for Brazil, which sees South Africa as an Nations Development Programme and targets essential partner and IBSA as a potential forum small localised projects in some of the most to boost existing activities. Of its 318 technical impoverished parts of the world. co-operation projects abroad, 125 are in 19 Three projects have been completed: a African countries. waste management
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Role of the Bric in Africa's Development
    Journal for Contemporary History 41(1) / Joernaal vir Eietydse Geskiedenis 41(1): 80-102 © UV/UFS • ISSN 0258-2422 / e-ISSN 2415-0509 http://dx.doi.org/10.18820/24150509/jch.v41i1.5 THE ROLE OF THE BRIC IN AFRICA’S DEVELOPMENT: DRIVERS AND STRATEGIES Mills Soko1 and Mzukisi Qobo2 Abstract National interest still trumps friendship in international relations. The notions of solidarity that were popular among developing countries in the 1950s and the 1960s have no resonance in 21st century diplomacy, which is largely driven by commercial considerations. Many developing countries still view the advent of rising powers – some of whom were part of the Third World movement that arrayed itself to counter imperialism – as offering promise for development progress. Taking an analytic assessment of the BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India and China) countries’ role in Africa’s development, this article argues that such hopes are misguided. BRIC countries are not primarily driven by Africa’s development concerns, but are seeking to fulfil their own commercial interests, as well as use Africa as an avenue for shoring up their international legitimacy and credibility. The article arrives at this conclusion by examining how each of the BRIC countries implements its commercial and diplomatic strategies on the African continent. South Africa is excluded from this analysis as the focus of the article is on how the non-African members of the BRICS formation pursue their diplomatic and commercial strategies on the African continent. Keywords: BRIC countries; drivers; development; strategies; Africa. Sleutelwoorde: BRIC-lande; dryfvere; ontwikkeling; strategieë; Afrika. 1. INTRODUCTION Since 1995, the African continent has registered rapid economic growth and development against the backdrop of both a commodities’ boom and expanding investment in a diverse range of sectors, from natural-resourced based industries to wholesale, retail, trade, telecommunications and manufacturing.
    [Show full text]
  • Brics Versus Mortar? Winning at M&A in Emerging Markets
    BRICs Versus Mortar? WINNING AT M&A IN EMERGING MARKETS The Boston Consulting Group (BCG) is a global management consulting firm and the world’s leading advisor on business strategy. We partner with clients from the private, public, and not-for- profit sectors in all regions to identify their highest-value opportunities, address their most critical challenges, and transform their enterprises. Our customized approach combines deep in sight into the dynamics of companies and markets with close collaboration at all levels of the client organization. This ensures that our clients achieve sustainable compet itive advantage, build more capable organizations, and secure lasting results. Founded in 1963, BCG is a private company with 78 offices in 43 countries. For more information, please visit bcg.com. BRICs VeRsus MoRtaR? WINNING AT M&A IN EMERGING MARKETS JENS KENGELBACH DOminiC C. Klemmer AlexAnDer Roos August 2013 | The Boston Consulting Group Contents 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8 THE GLOBAL M&A MARKET ReMAINS IN A DEEP FREEZE Disappointing Results for Public-to-Public Deals Emerging Markets Claim a Growing Share of Deal Flow Key Investing Themes 13 LEARNING FROM EXPERIENCE AND MANAGING COMPLEXITY: THE KEYS TO SUPERIOR ReTURNS Serial Acquirers Reap the Rewards of Experience The Virtue of Simplicity 17 A TOUR OF THE BRIC COUNTRIES Brazil Looks to the North Russia Seeks Technology, Resources—and Stability India Aims at Targets of Opportunity China Hunts for Management Know-How—and Access to the Global Business Arena 31 EMERGING THEMES AND ReCOMMENDATIONS 34 Appendix: Selected trAnSActionS, 2012 And 2013 36 FOR FURTHER ReADING 37 NOTE TO THE ReADER 2 | BRICs Versus Mortar? exeCutIVe suMMaRy espite the current worldwide lull in mergers and acquisitions, there’s Dnot much argument that emerging markets will remain a hotbed of M&A activity for some time to come.
    [Show full text]
  • Politics of Coalition in India
    Journal of Power, Politics & Governance March 2014, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 01–11 ISSN: 2372-4919 (Print), 2372-4927 (Online) Copyright © The Author(s). 2014. All Rights Reserved. Published by American Research Institute for Policy Development Politics of Coalition in India Farooq Ahmad Malik1 and Bilal Ahmad Malik2 Abstract The paper wants to highlight the evolution of coalition governments in india. The evaluation of coalition politics and an analysis of how far coalition remains dynamic yet stable. How difficult it is to make policy decisions when coalition of ideologies forms the government. More often coalitions are formed to prevent a common enemy from the government and capturing the power. Equally interesting is the fact a coalition devoid of ideological mornings survives till the enemy is humbled. While making political adjustments, principles may have to be set aside and in this process ideology becomes the first victim. Once the euphoria victory is over, differences come to the surface and the structure collapses like a pack of cards. On the grounds of research, facts and history one has to acknowledge india lives in politics of coalition. Keywords: india, government, coalition, withdrawal, ideology, partner, alliance, politics, union Introduction Coalition is a phenomenon of a multi-party government where a number of minority parties join hands for the purpose of running the government which is otherwise not possible. A coalition is formed when many groups come into common terms with each other and define a common programme or agenda on which they work. A coalition government always remains in pulls and pressures particularly in a multinational country like india.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Better Global Economic Brics
    Economics Global Economics Research from the GS Financial WorkbenchSM at https://www.gs.com Paper No: 66 Building Better Global Economic BRICs n In 2001 and 2002, real GDP growth in large emerging market economies will exceed that of the G7. n At end-2000, GDP in US$ on a PPP basis in Brazil, Russia, India and China (BRIC) was about 23.3% of world GDP. On a current GDP basis, BRIC share of world GDP is 8%. n Using current GDP, China’s GDP is bigger than that of Italy. n Over the next 10 years, the weight of the BRICs and especially China in world GDP will grow, raising important issues about the global economic impact of fiscal and monetary policy in the BRICs. n In line with these prospects, world policymaking forums should be re-organised and in particular, the G7 should be adjusted to incorporate BRIC representatives. Many thanks to David Blake, Paulo Leme, Binit Jim O’Neill Patel, Stephen Potter, David Walton and others in the Economics Department for their helpful 30th November 2001 suggestions. Important disclosures appear at the end of this document. Goldman Sachs Economic Research Group In London Jim O’Neill, M.D. & Head of Global Economic Research +44(0)20 7774 1160 Gavyn Davies, M.D. & Chief International Economist David Walton, M.D. & Chief European Economist Andrew Bevan, M.D. & Director of International Bond Economic Research Erik Nielsen, Director of New European Markets Economic Research Stephen Potter, E.D. & Senior Global Economist Al Breach, E.D & International Economist Linda Britten, E.D.
    [Show full text]
  • The China Relief Expedition Joint Coalition Warfare in China Summer 1900
    07-02574 China Relief Cover.indd 1 11/19/08 12:53:03 PM 07-02574 China Relief Cover.indd 2 11/19/08 12:53:04 PM The China Relief Expedition Joint Coalition Warfare in China Summer 1900 prepared by LTC(R) Robert R. Leonhard, Ph.D. The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory This essay reflects the views of the author alone and does not necessarily imply concurrence by The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (JHU/APL) or any other organization or agency, public or private. About the Author LTC(R) Robert R. Leonhard, Ph.D., is on the Principal Professional Staff of The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory and a member of the Strategic Assessments Office of the National Security Analysis Department. He retired from a 24-year career in the Army after serving as an infantry officer and war planner and is a veteran of Operation Desert Storm. Dr. Leonhard is the author of The Art of Maneuver: Maneuver-Warfare Theory and AirLand Battle (1991), Fighting by Minutes: Time and the Art of War (1994), The Principles of War for the Informa- tion Age (1998), and The Evolution of Strategy in the Global War on Terrorism (2005), as well as numerous articles and essays on national security issues. Foreign Concessions and Spheres of Influence China, 1900 Introduction The summer of 1900 saw the formation of a perfect storm of conflict over the northern provinces of China. Atop an anachronistic and arrogant national government sat an aged and devious woman—the Empress Dowager Tsu Hsi.
    [Show full text]
  • Explaining the BRICS Summit Solid, Strengthening Success1
    Explaining the BRICS Summit Solid, Strengthening Success1 John J. Kirton John J. Kirton —Professor, co-director, BRICS Research Group, co-director, G20 Research Group, director, G8 Research Group, Munk School of Global Affairs, University of Toronto, 1 Devonshire Place, Room 209N, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3K7, Canada; E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The BRICS have emerged as a solid, increasingly comprehensive, cooperative success, both alone and within the G20, on behalf of all emerging countries, as demonstrated by its summit performance since its start on the margins of the G8’s Hokkaido Summit in 2008 through to its gathering at the G20’s Brisbane Summit in 2014. This success is due primarily to the failure of the other international institutions from the 1944–45 and 1975 generations to give the leading emerging powers an equal, effective place and thus to solve the new, compounding global financial crisis and other challenges arising since 2008. The BRICS is a plurilateral summit institution growing in its level, membership, agenda and interaction intensity, with its summit performance rising substantially across an increasing array of major dimensions of global summit governance. This performance has been driven somewhat by the global financial, economic and food shocks since 2008, but primarily by the failure of the multilateral organizations from the 1940s, the G8-plus process from 2003 to 2009 and the first two G20 summits to give the big emerging powers the equal role, rights, responsibilities and effective influence warranted by their rising relative capability and international openness and needed to solve the new challenges of an intensely interconnected world.
    [Show full text]
  • The BRICS Model of South-South Cooperation
    August 2017 UJCI AFRICA-CHINA POLICY BRIEF 2 The BRICS Model of South-South Cooperation Swaran Singh UJCI Africa-China Policy Brief No 2 The BRICS Model of South-South Coperation Swaran Singh Professor in the School of International Studies of Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India. Series Editor: Dr David Monyae Published in August 2017 by: The University of Johannesburg Confucius Institute 9 Molesey Avenue, Auckland Park Johannesburg, South Africa www.confucius-institute.joburg External language editor: Riaan de Villiers Designed and produced by Acumen Publishing Solutions For enquiries, contact: Hellen Adogo, Research Assistant, UJCI Tel +27 (01)11 559-7504 Email: [email protected] Disclaimer: The views expressed in this Policy Brief do not necessarily reflect those of the UJCI. All rights reserved. This publication may not be stored, copied or reproduced without the permission of the UJCI. Brief extracts may be quoted, provided the source is fully acknowledged. UJCI Africa-China Brief No 2 | August 2017 THE earliest imaginations of South-South cooperation (SSC) have been traced to the Afro-Asian anti-colonial struggles of the 1940s. This is when initial ideas about shared identity, building solidarity towards asserting sovereignty, and channeling simmering opposition to the imperial ‘North’ first germinated. The Asian Relations Conference held in New Delhi in 1947, followed by the Afro-Asian Conference at Bandung (Indonesia) in April 1955, marked the first watersheds in the evolution of SSC, supported by the ‘non-alignment’ and ‘Third World’ paradigms (Chen and Chen 2010: 108-109). In 1960, the SSC thesis was further developed by the dependency theories of neo-Marxist sociologists from South America, who underlined the subservient nature of trade relations between their region and North America (Copeland 2009:64).
    [Show full text]
  • BRICS Economic and Trade Cooperation with Africa
    BRICS Economic and Trade Cooperation with Africa Yao Guimei Senior Research Fellow of IWAAS,CASS I. The BRIC rise together with Africa At the end of the Cold War, especially after the globe-sweeping financial crisis, the world economic and political landscape has undergone profound changes, thus led to the constant adjustment of interest distribution. Traditional economic powers witnessed sluggish growth while emerging economies represented by the BRIC have become important engines in international economy with their eye-catching growth. According to IMF estimate, the BRIC countries’ share of global output has climbed from 13.7 percent in 2007 to 17.5 percent in 2010; by 2015, their share will further increase to 22.1 percent. In addition, Goldman Sachs Group which firstly coined the popular term ‘the BRIC’ forecast that by 2027 the sum of BRIC GDPs may outrun that of the Group of Seven. As the BRICS cooperation mechanism gradually gets refined, their international influential shall be bigger and stronger. Meanwhile, the African economy has won worldwide attention by its strong performance. Since mid-1990s, the GDP of Africa has grown at an average annual rate of 5 percent. After the occurrence of international financial crisis, Africa has demonstrated good response capacity by growing steadily and inclusively which highlighted the world economy. By now, international authorities generally agreed that the foundation of African economic growth has become more solid than it was, therefore a positive development outlook is preferred. The current round of economic growth in Africa is not a one-time event. Rather it may be the starting point for the economy to really take off.
    [Show full text]
  • BRICS and African Region Partnership: Challenges and Opportunities
    • p- ISSN: 2521-2982 • e-ISSN: 2707-4587 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gpr.2019(IV-IV).07 • ISSN-L: 2521-2982 DOI: 10.31703/gpr.2019(IV-IV).07 Muhammad Atif * Muqarrab Akbar† BRICS and African Region Partnership: Challenges and Opportunities • Vol. IV, No. IV (Fall 2019) Abstract BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) has • Pages: 59 – 69 amplified its regional and global impact. The economic success of BRICS is a motivation to Africa because BRICS and African region have a similar historical background. The partnership between Africa and the BRICS has Headings extended fresh drive and created ample interest in last decades because BRICS • Abstract is playing an important role in international trade, investment and global • Key Words governance. Growing economic relations of the BRICS with African region can be • Introduction exemplary for global world. These relations are prospective of a suitable way of • Theoretical Framework economic change and sustainable progress in the African region. The resource of • BRICS interests toward African African region makes many opportunities and challenges among BRICS- African Region region’s partnership. The interest of western powers also prevail in the African • Opportunities for African Region region. This article commences a fair inquiry of the BRICS relation with African • Trade Opportunity region, possible opportunities and challenges. • Conclusion • References Key Words: BRICS, Global Governance, Regionalism, WTO, United Nations, African Region, Africa Introduction The abbreviation ‘BRIC’ was first invented as a capable economic bloc by Jim O’Neil in 2001 (O'Neill 2001). The bloc has started his first interactions in 2005 at the time of the meeting of G7 Finance Ministers.
    [Show full text]
  • Coalition Governments and Policy Distortions : the Indian Experience Bhaskar Dutta
    Coalition Governments and Policy Distortions : The Indian Experience Bhaskar Dutta I. Introduction Much of the recent policy discussion in India implicitly assumes a framework in which a benevolent government or social planner will optimally choose policy instruments in order to maximise the welfare of the representative individual, with the availabilitv of resources posing , f / r b I am most grateful to as the main constraint. This normative Sanghamitra Daiand Bharat view of government behaviour is, of Ramaswami for numerous course, an important tool of analysis. discussions and invaluable advice. However, it can often be a sterile exercise Thanks are also due to IRIS if it ignores completely the institutional University of Maryland for constraints and rigidities in which policy- financial support. making occurs. The presence of these constraints makes it important to analyse the positive theory of government behaviour, or in other words to explore what governments actually do. The recent public choice literature discusses various political features which crucially influence government behaviour, and which drive a wedge between what governments actually do and what they are advised to do by economists. Typically, political power is dispersed, either across different wings of the government, or amongst political parties in a coalition, or across parties that alternate in power through the medium of elections. The desire to concentrate or hold on to power can result in inefficient economic policies. For instance, lobbying by various interest groups together with the ruling party's wish to remain in power often results in policy distortions being exchanged for electoral support.1 Several papers also emphasise the presence of political cycles in economic policy formulation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Industrial Policies in the BRICS Economic Integration Process DEPARTMENT of POLICY, RESEARCH and STATISTICS
    Inclusive and Sustainable Industrial Development Working Paper Series WP 1 | 2020 The role of industrial policies in the BRICS economic integration process DEPARTMENT OF POLICY, RESEARCH AND STATISTICS WORKING PAPER 1/2020 The role of industrial policies in the BRICS economic integration process Fernando Santiago UNIDO UNITED NATIONS INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION Vienna, 2020 Acknowledgements The author is grateful for comments on earlier versions of this manuscript from Nobuya Haraguchi, Prof. Fantu Cheru, Prof. Li Chen, the editors of the Oxford Handbook of Industrial Policy, and participants at two review workshops held in Addis Ababa in April and September 2019. The designations employed, descriptions and classifications of countries, and the presentation of the material in this report do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries, or its economic system or degree of development. The views expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect the views of the Secretariat of the UNIDO. The responsibility for opinions expressed rests solely with the authors, and publication does not constitute an endorsement by UNIDO. Although great care has been taken to maintain the accuracy of information herein, neither UNIDO nor its member States assume any responsibility for consequences which may arise from the use of the material. Terms such as “developed”, “industrialized” and “developing” are intended for statistical convenience and do not necessarily express a judgment.
    [Show full text]
  • What Role for IBSA Dialogue Forum? Mehmet Özkan*
    January 2011 Journal of Global Analysis Integration in the Global South: What role for IBSA Dialogue Forum? Mehmet Özkan* Recently we have seen that the middle-sized states are coming together in several forums. The WTO meetings and India-Brazil-South Africa (IBSA) dialogue forum are among those to be cited. Such groupings are mainly economy- oriented and whether they will have political output needs to be seen, however, in the future if globalization goes in a similar way as today, we might see more groupings. Those groupings should be seen as reactions to unjust and exclusive globalization. The IBSA Dialogue Forum members have enhanced their relations economically by signing bilateral trade agreements and acting together on economic issues in global forums. If they can hold together, they are creating a market more than ¼ of global population and, if successful, it has a chance to be the engine of growth in the South. Moreover if they can create the biggest market in the South, they would also be influential in the being of the voice of the South. In that sense, this paper addresses the possible ways to develop relations between the IBSA members and economic development in the South, furthermore, implication of the IBSA on global governance and development can be as critical as its contribution to economic development, since the global governing bodies have legitimacy crisis. Keywords: South-South relations, the IBSA Dialogue Forum, pivotal middle power, economic development, international institutions. Mehmet ÖZKAN PhD Scholar Sevilla University, Spain e-mail: [email protected] www.cesran.org * Mehmet ÖZKAN is a PhD Candidate at Sevilla University, Spain focusing on how cultural/religious elements shape the foreign policy mentality in the non-western world, namely in South Africa, Turkey and India.
    [Show full text]