Dokumenti O Socijalističkom Pokretu U Sremu 1894–1908

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dokumenti O Socijalističkom Pokretu U Sremu 1894–1908 1 IZDANJE ODBORA ZA PROSLAVU PEDESETOGODIŠNJICE SRPSKE SOCIJAL- DEMOKRATSKE PARTIJE I GLAVNOG RADNIČKOG SAVEZA PRI POKRAJINSKOM ODBORU SSRNS ZA VOJVODINU DOKUMENTI O SOCIJALISTIČKOM POKRETU U SREMU 1894–1908 Sabrao i uredio Andrija Radenić NOVI SAD, 1955 2 SADRŽAJ Skraćenice Popis dokumenata Predgovor Dokumenti 1–185 Registri DAZ – Državni arhiv u Zagrebu VX – Akta Zemaljske vlade Hrvatske SSM – Akta Sudbenog stola u Mitrovici DK – Dosije procesa protiv socijalista, Korać AGB – Arhiva grada Beograda ZM – Akta Zemunskog magistrata GAK – Gradska arhiva u Sr. Karlovcima MB – AK – Muzej u Vukovaru, Kotarska arhiva ACK – Arhiv istoriskog odeljenja CK SKJ Štamparsko preduzeće „Zmaj“, Novi Sad – 1170–955 [POPIS DOKUMENATA] 1. Šid, 20 marta 1894 – 13 avgusta 1894. – Dnevnik Vitomira Koraća – razmišljanja i razgovori o nepravednostima postojećeg poretka i o potrebi okupljanja i organizovanja siromašnih slojeva društva zemljoradnika i zanatlija; prvi planovi i uspesi. 2. Šid, 1 maja 1894 – 2 decembra 1894. – Dnevnik Vitomira Koraća o primljenim socijalističkim brošurama. 3. Šid, 1 maja 1894 – 15 oktobra 1894. – Dnevnik Vitomira Koraća o razdeljenim, prodatim brošurama i novinama 4. Šid, 1 maja 1894 – 25. septembra 1894. – Glavna knjiga o rasturanju socijalističkih brošura i novina. 5. Šid, 2 maja (21. aprila) 1894. – Vitomir Korać Vasi Pelagiću u Beogradu – traži brošure i pita za socijalistički list radi pretplate. 6. Šid, 11 maja 1894. – Vitomir Korać Vasi Pelagiću – potvrđuje prijem brošure i listova i kazuje svoje dalje potrebe. 7. Šid, 6 juna (25. maja) 1894. godine. – Vitomir Korać Vasi Pelagiću – iznosi teškoće oko rasturanja brošura i skupljanja pretplatnika. 8. Šid, 4 jula 1894. – Vitomir Korać A. Radoševiću u Vukovaru – o potrebi rasturanja Pelagićevih spisa. 9. Šid, 19 novembra 1894. – Vitomir Korać Vasi Pelagiću – traži obaveštenje o cenama nekih knjiga i lista „Zanatliski savez“ 10. Šid, 17 aprila 1895. – Grupa šidskih socijalista uredništvu „Slobode“ u Zagrebu – javlja o širenju pokreta i traži obaveštenja o načinu proslave 1 maja. 11. Zagreb, 22 aprila 1895. – Odbor za proslavu 1 maja u Zagrebu V. Koraću u Šidu – o raznim mogućnostima proslave 1 maja. 3 12. Zagreb 26 aprila 1895 . – Uredništvo „Slobode“ grupi socijalista u Šidu – javlja da su traženi prvomajski spisi poslati i moli da se po proslavi napiše dopis za list. 13. Šid, 28 aprila 1895. – Spisak prilagača za proslavu 1 maja u Šidu. 14. Šid, 29 aprila 1895. – Odbor za proslavu 1 maja uredništvu „Slobode“ – traži detaljnija uputstva za proslavu koja je odložena na 1 maj po starom kalendaru. 15. Šid, 1 maja 1895. – Poglavarstvo opštine u Šidu Kotarskoj upravi – izveštava o hapšenju Vitomira Koraća. 16. Zagreb, 5 maja 1895. – Ivan Ancel odboru za proslavu 1 maja u Šidu – upozorava da se novine i spisi ne smeju javno prodavati i predlaže da se ovaj put proslava 1 maja ograniči na organizovanje zabave. 17. Vukovar, 12 maja 1895. – Podžupan Jurković banu – o socijalističkom pokretu u Šidu i okolini. 18. Šid, 13 maja 1895. – Žandarmeriska stanica u Šidu Kotarskoj oblasti u Šidu – izveštava o hapšenju grupe seljaka i zanatlija u Šidu. 19. Vukovar, 14 maja 1895. – Podžupan Jurković banu - dopunski izveštaj o socijalističkom pokretu u Šidu. 20. Srem 14 maja 1895 – 2 avgusta 1895. – Spisak saslušanih okrivljenika - imena sa zanimanjem, mestom i datumom rođenja i saslušanja. 21. Sr. Mitrovica, 14 maja 1895. – Zapisnik saslušanja Vitomira Koraća. 22. Vukovar, 16 maja 1895. – Veliki župan Sremske županije Gradskom poglavarstvu u Zemunu – traži da se dostavljaju imena svih vojnih obveznika privrženih socijal-demokratskim i anarhističkim načelima. 23. Sr. Mitrovica, 25 maja 1895. – Zapisnik saslušanja dr-a Dragutina Grčića, javnog beležnika u Šidu, svedoka optužbe protiv grupe socijalista 24. Sr. Mitrovica, 25 maja 1895. – Zapisnik saslušanja svedoka Petra Mrkića, opštinskog beležnika u Šidu. 25. Sr. Mitrovica, 14 juna 1895 . – Zapisnik saslušanja svedoka Ilije Vasića, sudskog izvršitelja u Šidu. 26. Sr. Mitrovica, 7 juna 1895. – Zapisnik saslušanja svedoka Jove Stajića, advokata u Šidu, 27. Sr. Mitrovica, 8 jula 1895. – Advokat dr. Aleksandar Roknić Sudbenom stolu u Mitrovici – da se njegovi klijenti Vitomir Korać i Nikola Jokić puste na slobodu. 28. Sr. Mitrovica, 12 jula 1895. – Optužnica Državnog tužioštva u Sr. Mitrovici protiv Vitomira Koraća, Lazara Foriškovića, Nikole Jokića, Ljubomira Šoića i Lazara Dudića. 29. Sr. Mitrovica, 25 jula 1895. – Zapisnik sudske rasprave protiv Vitomira Koraća, Lazara Foriškovića, Nikole Jokića, Ljubomira Šoića i Lazara Dudića. 30. Sr. Mitrovica, 27 jula 1895. – Tekst sudske presude. 31. Sr. Mitrovica, 29 jula 1895. – Vitomir Korać odustaje od žalbe na presudu. 32. Sr. Mitrovica, 23. avgusta 1895. – Advokat dr Fran Kucelić Sudbenom stolu u Mitrovici – podnosi žalbu na presudu Lazara Foriškovića, Nikole Jokića i Ljubomira Šoića. 33. Zagreb, 14. decembra 1895. – Odluka Stola sedmorice u Zagrebu na žalbu Lazara Foriškovića, Nikole Jokića i Ljubomira Šoića. 34. Sr. Mitrovica, 16. decembra 1895. – Vitomir Korać Sudbenom stolu – da mu se vrate zaplenjene stvari. 34a. Beograd, 16. marta 1896. – Vasa Pelagić Vitomiru Koraću u Šidu – pita da li je primio njegove brošure i list „Socijal-demokrat“ 35. Zagreb, 28. januara 1897. – Glavni odbor Socijal-demokratske partije daje socijalistima u Tovarniku uputstva za osnivanje i rad mesne organizacije kluba. 4 36. Zagreb, 8. februara 1897. – Glavni odbor Socijaldemokratske partije čestita socijalistima u Tovarniku osnivanje kluba i daje dalja uputstva za rad, ističući važnost organizacija. 37. Zagreb, 10. februara 1897. – Glavni odbor obaveštava klub Socijal-demokratske partije u Ilači da će neposredna uputstva za rad dobiti od socijalista iz Tovarnika. 38. Vukovar, 13. februara 1897. – Veliki župan Sremske županije Ervin Čeh izveštava Kuena Hedervarija o ponovnom razmahu socijalističke agitacije u Šidskom i Vukovarskom kotaru. 39. Vukovar, 17. februara 1897. – Podžupan Sremske županije Petar pl. Jurković dostavlja banu Kuenu izveštaje podložnih organa o socijalističkom pokretu i traži pojačanje žandarmeriske stanice u Šidskom kotaru. 40. Vukovar, 17. februara 1897. – Upravitelj kotarske oblasti u Vukovaru Josip Virag opštinskim poglavarima – da se preduzmu preventivne i represivne mere protiv socijalističkih agitatora. 41. Zagreb, 18. februara 1897. – Zemaljska vlada odobrava županu Sremske županije iznos od 100 for. za privatnog detektiva, angažovanog za nadziranje socijalista. 42. Tovarnik, 2. marta 1897. – Opštinsko poglavarstvo u Tovarniku objavljuje naredbu o zabrani sastajanja i uvođenju policiskog časa. 43. Vukovar, 24. marta 1897. – Podžupan Jurković upravitelju kotarske oblasti u Vukovaru Josipu Viragu – dostavlja režimske „Sremske novine“ radi rasturanja među seljacima. 44. Vukovar, 27. marta 1897. – Podžupan Sremske županije Jurković banu Kuenu – o blagotvornom uticaju hapšenja socijal-demokratskih vođa Ivana Ancela i Vitomira Koraća na smirenje duhova zahvaćenih socijalističkom propagandom. 45. Vukovar, 29. marta 1897. – Podžupan Sremske županije Jurković banu Kuenu – o potrebi da se Ancel zadrži u zatvoru i da se uhapsi urednik socijal-demokratskog lista „Slobode“ Stjepan Lapuh s obzirom na ponovno jačanje socijalističkog pokreta. 46. Vukovar, 31. marta 1897. – Kotarska oblast višoj instanci – povodom zahteva seljaka iz Marinaca da se pusti na slobodu njihov uhapšeni drug. 47. Vukovar, 1. aprila 1897. – Podžupan Jurković dostavlja banu iscrpan izveštaj o socijalističkom pokretu u Šidskom, Vukovarskom i Vinkovačkom kotaru. 48. Vukovar, 1. aprila 1897. – Podžupan Jurković javlja banu o potrebi da se vodnik žandarmeriske stanice u Šidu premesti, jer kao čovek već stariji i mirnije prirode ne odgovara mestu i vremenu u kojem kipti socijalistički pokret 49. Osijek, 1. aprila 1897. – Podžupan Virovitičke županije Čavrak banu Kuenu – o političkoj delatnosti opozicionih stranaka koje koriste i iz Sreme „uneseni“ socijalistički pokret. 50. Zagreb, 4. aprila 1897. – Zemaljska vlada podžupanu Sremske županije Jurkoviću i gradonačelniku Zagreba Mošinskom – da se povede kazneni postupak protiv urednika „Slobode“ Lapuha i da se pojača nadzor nad putnicima iz Srema koji posećuju redakciju socijal-demokratskog lista. 51. Vukovar, 4. aprila 1897. Kotarska oblast višoj instanci – o merama protiv socijalista u Bršadinu. 52. Trpinja, 4. april 1897. – Danilo Kukić, beležnik, podžupanu Jurkoviću u Vukovaru – traži instrukcije radi sprečavanja delatnosti socijalističke organizacije u Trpinji. 53. Zemun, 4. aprila 1897. – Policiski komesarijat javlja banu da je Vaso Pelagić pomilovan i da se opet nalazi na slobodi u Beogradu. 54. Zagreb, 5. aprila 1897. – Gradsko poglavarstvo u Zagrebu Pretsedništvu zemaljske vlade u Zagrebu – o povezanosti socijalističkog pokreta u Sremu sa agitacionom delatnošću Glavnog odbora Socijal- demokratske partije u Zagrebu; predlaže energične mere. 5 55. Vukovar, 5. aprila 1897. – Podžupan Jurković kotarskoj oblasti u Vukovaru – dostavlja spisak članova kluba socijalista u Negoslavcima. 56. Mitrovica, 6. aprila 1897. – Vodnik žandarmerije javlja svojoj komandi o zapleni Pelagićevih brošura kod Ace Bankovačkog u Irigu 57. Mitrovica, 6. april 1897. – Odluka suda u Sr. Mitrovici o zabrani rasturanja Pelagićevih brošura. 58. Vukovar, 7. aprila 1897. – Podžupan Jurković izveštava Bana – da je izdao nalog da se Vaso Pelagić u slučaju prelaska granice uhapsi na osnovu poternice Sudbenog stola u Petrinji od 27. 4. 1880, koja je još u važnosti; u prilogu tekst poternice. 59. Vukovar, 8. aprila
Recommended publications
  • FEEFHS Journal Volume VII No. 1-2 1999
    FEEFHS Quarterly A Journal of Central & Bast European Genealogical Studies FEEFHS Quarterly Volume 7, nos. 1-2 FEEFHS Quarterly Who, What and Why is FEEFHS? Tue Federation of East European Family History Societies Editor: Thomas K. Ecllund. [email protected] (FEEFHS) was founded in June 1992 by a small dedicated group Managing Editor: Joseph B. Everett. [email protected] of American and Canadian genealogists with diverse ethnic, reli- Contributing Editors: Shon Edwards gious, and national backgrounds. By the end of that year, eleven Daniel Schlyter societies bad accepted its concept as founding members. Each year Emily Schulz since then FEEFHS has doubled in size. FEEFHS nows represents nearly two hundred organizations as members from twenty-four FEEFHS Executive Council: states, five Canadian provinces, and fourteen countries. lt contin- 1998-1999 FEEFHS officers: ues to grow. President: John D. Movius, c/o FEEFHS (address listed below). About half of these are genealogy societies, others are multi-pur- [email protected] pose societies, surname associations, book or periodical publish- 1st Vice-president: Duncan Gardiner, C.G., 12961 Lake Ave., ers, archives, libraries, family history centers, on-line services, in- Lakewood, OH 44107-1533. [email protected] stitutions, e-mail genealogy list-servers, heraldry societies, and 2nd Vice-president: Laura Hanowski, c/o Saskatchewan Genealogi- other ethnic, religious, and national groups. FEEFHS includes or- cal Society, P.0. Box 1894, Regina, SK, Canada S4P 3EI ganizations representing all East or Central European groups that [email protected] have existing genealogy societies in North America and a growing 3rd Vice-president: Blanche Krbechek, 2041 Orkla Drive, group of worldwide organizations and individual members, from Minneapolis, MN 55427-3429.
    [Show full text]
  • The PE EPS Environmental Report for 2015
    Environmental Protection Electric Power Industry of Serbia 2015 Environmental Report Belgrade, April 2016 PE Electric Power Industry of Serbia Environmental Protection INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................................................................................6 1. COAL AND ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................7 1.1 PE EPS COAL PRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................................7 1.2 PE EPS ELECTRICITY GENERATION ........................................................................................................................................7 1.3 FUEL CONSUMPTION AND HAZARDOUS AND HARMFUL SUBSTANCES AIR EMISSION FROM PE EPS TPPS ..................................8 1.4 PE EPS WORK INJURIES ......................................................................................................................................................10 1.5 PE EPS HEALTH ..................................................................................................................................................................10 2. KOLUBARA MINING BASIN BRANCH ......................................................................................................................................12 A KOLUBARA MB – OPEN CAST MINES
    [Show full text]
  • Remote Sensing Analyses on Sentinel-2 Images: Looking for Roman Roads in Srem Region (Serbia)
    Article Remote Sensing Analyses on Sentinel-2 Images: Looking for Roman Roads in Srem Region (Serbia) Sara Zanni 1 and Alessandro De Rosa 2,* 1 Domaine Universitaire, Maison de l’Archéologie, Institut Ausonius (UMR 5607), Université Bordeaux Montaigne, 8 Esplanade des Antilles, 33600 Pessac, France; [email protected] 2 Independent Researcher, via XXV Aprile 16, 87053 Celico CS, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 25 November 2018; Accepted: 28 December 2018; Published: 5 January 2019 Abstract: The present research is part of the project “From Aquileia to Singidunum: reconstructing the paths of the Roman travelers—RecRoad”, developed at the Université Bordeaux Montaigne, thanks to a Marie Skłodowska-Curie fellowship. One of the goals of the project was to detect and reconstruct the Roman viability between the Roman cities of Aquileia (Aquileia, Italy) and Singidunum (Belgrade, Serbia), using different sources and methods, one of which is satellite remote sensing. The research project analyzed and combined several data, including images produced by the Sentinel-2 mission, funded by the European Commission Earth Observation Programme Copernicus, in which satellites were launched between 2015 and 2017. These images are freely available for scientific and commercial purposes, and constitute a constantly updated gallery of the whole planet, with a revisit time of five days at the Equator. The technical specifications of the satellites’ sensors are particularly suitable for archaeological mapping purposes, and their capacities in this field still need to be fully explored. The project provided a useful testbed for the use of Sentinel-2 images in the archaeological field. The study compares traditional Vegetation Indices with experimental trials on Sentinel images applied to the Srem District in Serbia.
    [Show full text]
  • Democratic League of Tie Croats in Vojvodina
    I DEMOCRATIC LEAGUE OF TIE CROATS IN VOJVODINA DOCUMENTS January 1994 Address: Democratic League of the Croats in Vojvodina Trg Lazara Nesica 1/X 24000 Subotica Yugoslavia Tel/fax: (381) 24 51 348 39 459 a CONTENTS I. MAPS OF THE EX FORMER SOCIALIST FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF YUGOSLAVIA II. INTRODUCTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION IV. POPULATION V. CULTURAL AND SOCIAL INSTITUTIONS VI. HISTORICAL EVENTS VII. THE CROATS IN VOJVODINA VIII. JURIDICAL SITUATION OF CROATS IN VOJVODINA IX. VIOLATION OF HUMAN CIVIL AND COLLECTIVE RIGHTS EX SFR Yugoslavia ~F_. HUNGARY. ROMANIA Belgrade CROATS IN BACKA, SRIJEM AND BANAT (VOJVODINA) POSITION OF CROATS IN VOJVODINA REGARDING THEIR CULTURAL, POLITICAL, AND OTHER FUNDAMENTAL AND HUMAN RIGHTS Introduction As a result of the Croats in Vojvodina being deprived of their rights and the assimilatory policies which have calculatedly been implemented for over 70 years, the Croatian population has constantly been in decline. The war against Croatia and the destruction the war has caused directly reflect upon the status of Croats in Vojvodina. All too often they are insulted and taunted. They are attacked through public media, the Croatian media are blocked, they are mistreated by Serbian government authorities and rendered powerless in all areas of public life. Croatian cultural and historic monuments are being destroyed (Baa, Subotica, among others), and Croatian homes in Novi Slankamen have been blasted by machine gun fire, besides a whole line of similar occurrences. With that kind of politics, Serbia, especially after the cessation of the constitutional autonomy of Vojvodina, would like to destroy the will of the Croats to live in the areas of Barka, Banat, and Srijem, where Croats had already been living for thirteen hundred years.
    [Show full text]
  • Uredba O Kategorizaciji Državnih Puteva
    UREDBA O KATEGORIZACIJI DRŽAVNIH PUTEVA ("Sl. glasnik RS", br. 105/2013 i 119/2013) Predmet Član 1 Ovom uredbom kategorizuju se državni putevi I reda i državni putevi II reda na teritoriji Republike Srbije. Kategorizacija državnih puteva I reda Član 2 Državni putevi I reda kategorizuju se kao državni putevi IA reda i državni putevi IB reda. Državni putevi IA reda Član 3 Državni putevi IA reda su: Redni broj Oznaka puta OPIS 1. A1 državna granica sa Mađarskom (granični prelaz Horgoš) - Novi Sad - Beograd - Niš - Vranje - državna granica sa Makedonijom (granični prelaz Preševo) 2. A2 Beograd - Obrenovac - Lajkovac - Ljig - Gornji Milanovac - Preljina - Čačak - Požega 3. A3 državna granica sa Hrvatskom (granični prelaz Batrovci) - Beograd 4. A4 Niš - Pirot - Dimitrovgrad - državna granica sa Bugarskom (granični prelaz Gradina) 5. A5 Pojate - Kruševac - Kraljevo - Preljina Državni putevi IB reda Član 4 Državni putevi IB reda su: Redni Oznaka OPIS broj puta 1. 10 Beograd-Pančevo-Vršac - državna granica sa Rumunijom (granični prelaz Vatin) 2. 11 državna granica sa Mađarskom (granični prelaz Kelebija)-Subotica - veza sa državnim putem A1 3. 12 Subotica-Sombor-Odžaci-Bačka Palanka-Novi Sad-Zrenjanin-Žitište-Nova Crnja - državna granica sa Rumunijom (granični prelaz Srpska Crnja) 4. 13 Horgoš-Kanjiža-Novi Kneževac-Čoka-Kikinda-Zrenjanin-Čenta-Beograd 5. 14 Pančevo-Kovin-Ralja - veza sa državnim putem 33 6. 15 državna granica sa Mađarskom (granični prelaz Bački Breg)-Bezdan-Sombor- Kula-Vrbas-Srbobran-Bečej-Novi Bečej-Kikinda - državna granica sa Rumunijom (granični prelaz Nakovo) 7. 16 državna granica sa Hrvatskom (granični prelaz Bezdan)-Bezdan 8. 17 državna granica sa Hrvatskom (granični prelaz Bogojevo)-Srpski Miletić 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights Abuses of Non-Serbs in Kosovo, Sand“Ak and Vojvodina1
    May 1994 Vol. 6, Issue 6 Human Rights Abuses of Non-Serbs In Kosovo, Sandñññak and Vojvodina1 With the world's attention distracted by events in Bosnia-Hercegovina, Serbian and Montenegrin authorities have stepped up oppression of non-Serbs in Serbia and Montenegro. In particular, incidents of police abuse, arbitrary arrests and abuse in detention have been prevalent in the three regions of Serbia and Montenegro in which non-Serbs constitute a majority or significant minority: Kosovo (a province of Serbia which is 90 percent ethnic Albanian), Sandñak (a region of Serbia and Montenegro which is over 50 percent Muslim) and Vojvodina (a province of Serbia which is approximately 19 percent ethnic Hungarian, 5.4 percent Croat and 3.4 percent Slovak).2 The governments of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia3 and Serbia have done little or nothing to curb human rights abuses in their own territory. Instead, the authorities have at times directly participated in the abuse C through direction, control and support of the police, army, paramilitary, and judiciary C and, at other times, condoned the abuse by failing to investigate and prosecute cases of abuse by armed civilians and paramilitary squads. 1 This statement was submitted to the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe on May 6, 1994. 2 Note that approximately 8 percent of Vojvodina's population identified themselves as "Yugoslav" in the 1991 census. 3 "Yugoslavia" refers to the self-proclaimed Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, the union of Serbia (including the provinces of Vojvodina and Kosovo) and Montenegro. Although claiming successor status to the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (SFRY), the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has not been internationally recognized as a successor state to the SFRY.
    [Show full text]
  • Serbian and Montenegrin Authorities Have Stepped up Oppression of Non-Serbs in Serbia and Montenegro
    May 1994 Vol. 6, Issue 6 Human Rights Abuses of NonNon----SerbsSerbs 111 In Kosovo, Sandñññak and Vojvodina With the world's attention distracted by events in Bosnia-Hercegovina, Serbian and Montenegrin authorities have stepped up oppression of non-Serbs in Serbia and Montenegro. In particular, incidents of police abuse, arbitrary arrests and abuse in detention have been prevalent in the three regions of Serbia and Montenegro in which non-Serbs constitute a majority or significant minority: Kosovo (a province of Serbia which is 90 percent ethnic Albanian), Sandñak (a region of Serbia and Montenegro which is over 50 percent Muslim) and Vojvodina (a province of Serbia which is approximately 19 percent ethnic Hungarian, 5.4 percent Croat and 3.4 percent Slovak).2 The governments of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia3 and Serbia have done little or nothing to curb human rights abuses in their own territory. Instead, the authorities have at times directly participated in the abuse C through direction, control and support of the police, army, paramilitary, and judiciary C and, at other times, condoned the abuse by failing to investigate and prosecute cases of abuse by armed civilians and paramilitary squads. 1 This statement was submitted to the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe on May 6, 1994. 2 Note that approximately 8 percent of Vojvodina's population identified themselves as "Yugoslav" in the 1991 census. 3 "Yugoslavia" refers to the self-proclaimed Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, the union of Serbia (including the provinces of Vojvodina and Kosovo) and Montenegro. Although claiming successor status to the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (SFRY), the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has not been internationally recognized as a successor state to the SFRY.
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Area of Belgrade and Its Impact on Vital Component in the Example of Settlements in the Municipality of Stara Pazova
    GEOGRAPHICAL INSTITUTE “JOVAN CVIJIC” SASA COLLECTION OF PAPERS NO 56 YEAR 2007 911.3:314.8(497.11) Dragana Matijevic∗ FUNCTIONAL AREA OF BELGRADE AND ITS IMPACT ON VITAL COMPONENT IN THE EXAMPLE OF SETTLEMENTS IN THE MUNICIPALITY OF STARA PAZOVA Abstract: One has not still investigated the functional area of Belgrade sufficiently in a domain of domestic urban geography. For that reason, this paper analyzes the territory of the municipality of Stara Pazova as a part of Belgrade functional area, which does not belong to it administratively but connects the main city by firm spatial-functional interactions. The mentioned territory will be analyzed from the aspect of demographic development, i.e. in the example of population growth trend. The negative trend has characterized the dynamics of the vital element development for almost several years. However, even with the declining trend, the natural development of the population on the territory of the municipality of Stara Pazova differentiated in comparison with the remaining parts of Srem and Voivodina, owing to the late phenomenon of negative natural development of the population. Such legality of biological component development firmly connects the geographic legalities of the location and gravitation. The mentioned researches should point out if the territories belonging to the functional area of some town settlements represent the places of the demographic polarization, concentration and territories also differing from the areas that do not belong to the functional area of a town, according to the indicators of the vital trends. The results of the researches should confirm the thesis that urban regions represent relevant factors of the demographic polarity.
    [Show full text]
  • Territorial and Socio-Economic Analysis of the Programme Area
    TERRITORIAL AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE PROGRAMME AREA 1 TERRITORIAL AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE PROGRAMME AREA Table of content: 1. Executive summary ........................................................................................................................ 5 2. Methodology................................................................................................................................... 8 3. Analysis of current state, challenges and needs with potentials for development ................... 11 3.1. General analysis of the area - key indicators....................................................................... 11 3.2. Smarter Europe .................................................................................................................... 14 Description of current state in key analysis areas ...................................................................... 14 3.2.1. Research and innovation ............................................................................................. 14 a. Croatia: ......................................................................................................................... 14 b. Serbia: ........................................................................................................................... 15 c. Programme area level: ................................................................................................. 16 3.2.2. Digitisation of society ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rezultati Ogleda 2016.Pdf
    Rezultati STRIP ogleda kukuruza u 2016. godini LOKALITET VRBAS LUKIĆEVO ŠIMANOVCI LIPAR PANČEVO KIKINDA HIBRIDI VLAGA (%) PRINOS (T/HA) VLAGA (%) PRINOS (T/HA) VLAGA (%) PRINOS (T/HA) VLAGA (%) PRINOS (T/HA) VLAGA (%) PRINOS (T/HA) VLAGA (%) PRINOS (%) AS 334 15.82 10.25 15.4 10.25 13.7 10.53 16.8 8.98 13.3 13.36 15.55 10.61 STRANI STANDARD 15.49 10.41 15.7 11.22 14.3 10.28 14.7 9.61 15.6 11.29 14.75 10.93 AS 201 15.55 12.33 15.3 10.84 14.1 10.33 14.5 9.28 15.6 11.53 14.50 10.74 STRANI STANDARD 16.01 12.32 16 9.21 12.7 9.26 15.1 6.52 13.1 10.67 14.70 10.12 DOMAĆI STANDARD 16.29 12.34 15.9 10.25 13.3 12.10 15.0 9.47 14.6 10.40 15.15 11.03 AS 534 17.12 11.70 16 10.56 13.3 11.98 16.0 9.91 16.4 10.89 14.40 10.95 AS 54 16.27 12.81 17.1 9.26 12.9 11.18 17.3 10.77 16.8 12.82 14.80 10.77 AS5M11 17.41 11.09 17.4 9.61 13.1 11.01 16.5 9.50 18.3 12.14 15.45 10.03 AS5M43 17.32 13.81 18.8 10.95 15.0 11.85 17.4 11.61 17.2 12.38 14.95 11.42 AS5B23 17.50 13.76 18.9 10.82 14.7 11.43 20.3 9.91 0.0 0.00 15.25 11.31 STRANI STANDARD 16.81 13.93 15.9 11.15 14.0 9.80 20.2 10.09 15.0 11.77 15.15 12.36 AS5D53 19.08 13.33 18.3 10.20 13.3 11.79 20.0 9.57 17.5 12.72 16.30 11.61 STRANI STANDARD 17.01 11.55 17.8 10.88 16.0 9.10 17.8 11.62 14.6 12.06 15.40 12.47 AS 507 18.18 12.01 18.9 9.64 12.4 11.97 19.9 12.25 16.7 12.07 15.90 11.66 DOMAĆI STANDARD 18.39 11.02 20.7 8.94 15.5 12.01 21.0 10.06 15.2 10.25 16.30 11.53 AS 603 18.62 10.59 18.5 10.93 0.0 0.00 20.1 10.93 16.7 11.50 16.15 12.73 AS 72 18.38 13.16 20.8 9.97 15.4 13.08 19.9 11.32 17.6 11.48 17.00 10.57 AS6P62
    [Show full text]
  • Sremski Okrug
    OKRUGOKRUG SSRREEMMSSKKII OOPPŠŠTTIINNEE Inđija, Irig, Pećinci, Ruma, Sremska Mitrovica, Stara Pazova, Šabac, Šid Adaševci, Batrovci, Brdnik, Donji Petrovci, Erdevik, Gibarac, Golubinci, Hrtkovci, Inđija, Irig, Jarkovci, Jazak Prnjavor, Krčedin, Kupinovo, Laćarak, Morović, Novi Banovci, Obrež, Pećinci, Privina Glava, Ljuba, Ravnje, Ruma, Sot, Sremska Mitrovica, Stari Slankamen, Velika Remeta, Višnjićevo, Vrdnik, Zasavica, Šašinci, Šid 6-2 Sremski okrug Zahvata teritoriju Srema, bez Karakteristično za o vaj ok rug krajne severnog pojasa koji pripada Novom Sadu, i delove opštine AMBARI I ČARDA CI Sremska Mitrovica koje se nalaze ispod reke Save. Naj ve ći broj o ču va nih i iz van red no le pih am ba ra na la zi se Površina okruga iznosi 3486 km², a u Go lu bin ci ma, u kup no tri. To su am ba ri sa ko to ba njom po- broj stanovnika premašuje 335000. ro di ca Ga le čić, Lep ša no vić i Surduč ki. Am ba ri se na la ze u Okrug čini 7 opština i 109 naselja, ok vi ru pri vat nih dvo riš ta ko ja ni su ot vo re na za po se te, a je di- a administrativni centar je Sremska no pr va dva se mo gu (sa mo de li mič no) vi de ti sa u li ce. Mitrovica. U Ku pi no vu se na la ze dva am ba ra sa ko to ba njom, je dan u Sav skoj 15 i dru gi u Ži ke Ma ri či ća 17. Lju baz ni do ma ći ni do puš ta ju na merni ci ma u laz i raz gle da nje iz dvo riš ta.
    [Show full text]
  • T-PVS/Files (2017) 8 [Files08e 2017.Docx]
    Strasbourg, 23 August 2017 T-PVS/Files (2017) 8 [files08e_2017.docx] CONVENTION ON THE CONSERVATION OF EUROPEAN WILDLIFE AND NATURAL HABITATS Standing Committee 37th meeting Strasbourg, 5-8 December 2017 __________ Complaints on stand-by Presumed deliberate killing of birds & Alleged deliberate killing of birds of prey in Serbia - REPORT BY THE GOVERNMENT - Document prepared by the Ministry of Agriculture and Environmental Protection, Serbia ____________________________________________________________________ This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. Ce document ne sera plus distribué en réunion. Prière de vous munir de cet exemplaire. T-PVS/Files (2017) 8 - 2 - - UPDATED AUGUST 2017 - REPORT ON THE COMPLAINT NO. 2014/3 - ASSUMED DELIBERATE KILLING OF BIRDS IN SERBIA, AND REPORT ON THE COMPLAINT NO. 2016/3 - PRESUMED DELIBERATE KILLING OF BIRDS IN SERBIA IN 2017 In the course of the complaint proceedings, and at the request of the Secretariat and the Bureau of the Bern Convention, the Ministry of Environmental Protection implements planned measures in cooperation with other competent authorities and organizations, duly providing relevant information, involving NGOs and raising public awareness of the importance of addressing the relevant issues at national level. The report on the progress made in dealing with the cases referred to in the Complaint No. 2014/3 and the Complaint No. 2016/3 was prepared based on the official reports submitted by the competent institutions and organizations at national and
    [Show full text]