DOCSLIB.ORG

Territorial and Socio-Economic Analysis of the Programme Area

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Territorial and Socio-Economic Analysis of the Programme Area TERRITORIAL AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE PROGRAMME AREA 1 TERRITORIAL AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE PROGRAMME AREA Table of content: 1. Executive summary ........................................................................................................................ 5 2. Methodology................................................................................................................................... 8 3. Analysis of current state, challenges and needs with potentials for development ................... 11 3.1. General analysis of the area - key indicators....................................................................... 11 3.2. Smarter Europe .................................................................................................................... 14 Description of current state in key analysis areas ...................................................................... 14 3.2.1. Research and innovation ............................................................................................. 14 a. Croatia: ......................................................................................................................... 14 b. Serbia: ........................................................................................................................... 15 c. Programme area level: ................................................................................................. 16 3.2.2. Digitisation of society ................................................................................................... 18 a. Croatia: ......................................................................................................................... 18 b. Serbia: ........................................................................................................................... 21 c. Programme area - best practice examples: ................................................................ 23 3.2.3. SME competitiveness ................................................................................................... 25 a. Croatia .......................................................................................................................... 25 b. Serbia ............................................................................................................................ 26 c. Programme area ........................................................................................................... 28 3.2.4. Skills for smart specialisation ...................................................................................... 32 a. Croatia .......................................................................................................................... 33 b. Serbia ............................................................................................................................ 34 c. Educating for skills ....................................................................................................... 36 3.2.5. Digital connectivity ...................................................................................................... 43 a. Croatia .......................................................................................................................... 43 b. Serbia ............................................................................................................................ 44 3.2.6. Conclusions and recommendations ............................................................................ 45 3.3. Greener Europe .................................................................................................................... 47 Description of current state in key analysis areas ...................................................................... 47 3.3.1. Energy efficiency .......................................................................................................... 47 a. Croatia .......................................................................................................................... 47 b. Serbia ............................................................................................................................ 49 3.3.2. Renewable energy (RES) .............................................................................................. 50 a. Croatia .......................................................................................................................... 50 b. Serbia ............................................................................................................................ 52 3.3.3. Smart energy systems .................................................................................................. 54 3.3.4. Climate change adaptation ......................................................................................... 56 a. Croatia .......................................................................................................................... 56 b. Serbia ............................................................................................................................ 57 3.3.5. Sustainable water ........................................................................................................ 59 a. Croatia .......................................................................................................................... 59 b. Serbia ............................................................................................................................ 59 3.3.6. Circular economy ......................................................................................................... 61 2 TERRITORIAL AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE PROGRAMME AREA a. Croatia .......................................................................................................................... 61 b. Serbia ............................................................................................................................ 62 3.3.7. Nature protection and biodiversity ............................................................................. 63 a. Croatia .......................................................................................................................... 63 b. Serbia ............................................................................................................................ 65 3.3.8. Conclusions and recommendations ............................................................................ 69 3.4. Connected Europe ................................................................................................................ 71 Description of current state in key analysis areas ...................................................................... 71 3.4.1. Sustainable Trans European Transport Network ....................................................... 71 a. Croatia .......................................................................................................................... 71 a. Serbia ............................................................................................................................ 73 3.4.2. Sustainable transport .................................................................................................. 74 a. Croatia............................................................................................................................... 75 b. Serbia ................................................................................................................................ 76 3.4.3. Sustainable urban mobility ......................................................................................... 77 a. Croatia............................................................................................................................... 77 b. Serbia ................................................................................................................................ 79 3.4.4. Conclusions and recommendations ............................................................................ 81 3.5. Social Europe ........................................................................................................................ 83 Description of current state in key analysis areas ...................................................................... 83 3.5.1. Labour market infrastructure ...................................................................................... 83 a. Croatia .......................................................................................................................... 83 b. Serbia ............................................................................................................................ 86 c. Regional level ............................................................................................................... 88 3.5.2. Education and training infrastructure ......................................................................... 94 a. Croatia .......................................................................................................................... 94 b. Serbia ............................................................................................................................ 94 c. Regional level ............................................................................................................... 96 3.5.3. Integration of marginalised communities, migrants and disadvantaged groups ..... 97
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Srijemskoj Županiji U Popisima 1991. I 2001. Godine
    Ljiljana DOBROVŠAK NACIONALNE MANJINE U VUKOVARSKO- -SRIJEMSKOJ žUPANIJI U POPISIMA 1991. I 2001. GODINE Uvod Na području Hrvatske tradicionalno živi veliki broj nacionalnih manjina, najviše u Istri, sjevernoj Dalmaci- ji, Lici, Kordunu, Banovini, zapadnoj i istočnoj Slavoniji i Baranji. Primjerice, u Vukovarsko-srijemskoj županiji brojne nacionalne manjine živjele su u prošlosti, a tako je i sada. Nacionalne manjine naseljavale su to područje tije- kom raznih povijesnih razdoblja, počevši od srednjeg vije- ka, pa sve do dvadesetog stoljeća. Neke nacionalne manji- ne oduvijek žive na ovim prostorima, dok su se pripadnici drugih doseljavali u različitim razdobljima.1 Osamosta- ljivanjem Republike Hrvatske i njezinim međunarodnim priznanjem 1992. godine, nacionalne manjine dobivaju nov status. To se odnosi na sve nacionalne manjine, bez obzira na to jesu li do tada formalno imale status manjine ili ne.2 Republika Hrvatska je od bivše SFRJ naslijedila model zaštite prava samo nekih nacionalnih manjina te je odmah po uspostavi neovisnosti priznala i stečena prava ostalih nacionalnih manjina. Međutim, taj proces prizna- vanja nije bio lagan. Prava nacionalnih manjina u Repu- blici Hrvatskoj regulirao je tek Ustavni zakon o pravima nacionalnih manjina, koji je stupio na snagu 23. prosinca 2002. godine, a njime se Republika Hrvatska obvezala na poštivanje i zaštitu prava nacionalnih manjina u skladu s Ustavom i međunarodnim dokumentima. Prema njemu: Nacionalna manjina je skupina hrvatskih državlja- na čiji pripadnici su tradicionalno nastanjeni na teritoriju Republike Hrvatske, a njeni članovi imaju etnička, jezična, kulturna i/ili vjerska obilježja različita od drugih građana i vodi ih želja za očuvanjem tih obilježja (članak 5. Ustavnog zakona). Više o povijesno-političkim razdobljima doseljavanja stanovništva kod: Alica Wertheimer Baletić i Anđelko Akrap, Razvoj stanovništva Vuko- varsko-srijemske županije s posebnim osvrtom na ekonomsku strukturu od 1971.
    [Show full text]
  • FEEFHS Journal Volume VII No. 1-2 1999
    FEEFHS Quarterly A Journal of Central & Bast European Genealogical Studies FEEFHS Quarterly Volume 7, nos. 1-2 FEEFHS Quarterly Who, What and Why is FEEFHS? Tue Federation of East European Family History Societies Editor: Thomas K. Ecllund. [email protected] (FEEFHS) was founded in June 1992 by a small dedicated group Managing Editor: Joseph B. Everett. [email protected] of American and Canadian genealogists with diverse ethnic, reli- Contributing Editors: Shon Edwards gious, and national backgrounds. By the end of that year, eleven Daniel Schlyter societies bad accepted its concept as founding members. Each year Emily Schulz since then FEEFHS has doubled in size. FEEFHS nows represents nearly two hundred organizations as members from twenty-four FEEFHS Executive Council: states, five Canadian provinces, and fourteen countries. lt contin- 1998-1999 FEEFHS officers: ues to grow. President: John D. Movius, c/o FEEFHS (address listed below). About half of these are genealogy societies, others are multi-pur- [email protected] pose societies, surname associations, book or periodical publish- 1st Vice-president: Duncan Gardiner, C.G., 12961 Lake Ave., ers, archives, libraries, family history centers, on-line services, in- Lakewood, OH 44107-1533. [email protected] stitutions, e-mail genealogy list-servers, heraldry societies, and 2nd Vice-president: Laura Hanowski, c/o Saskatchewan Genealogi- other ethnic, religious, and national groups. FEEFHS includes or- cal Society, P.0. Box 1894, Regina, SK, Canada S4P 3EI ganizations representing all East or Central European groups that [email protected] have existing genealogy societies in North America and a growing 3rd Vice-president: Blanche Krbechek, 2041 Orkla Drive, group of worldwide organizations and individual members, from Minneapolis, MN 55427-3429.
    [Show full text]
  • Razvojna Strategija 2015. – 2020
    Općina Donji Andrijevci RAZVOJNA STRATEGIJA 2015. – 2020. Autori: Tim za izradu razvojne strategije Općine Donji Andrijevci u suradnji sa Subra Consulting d.o.o Donji Andrijevci, lipanj 2015.g. Sadržaj: 1. Uvod – Zašto strategija? ............................................................................................................ 4 2. Sažetak ...................................................................................................................................... 5 3. Metodologija izrade .................................................................................................................. 7 3. 1. Popis radionica .................................................................................................................. 9 4. Opis trenutnog stanja .............................................................................................................. 11 4.1. Povijest ............................................................................................................................. 12 4.2. Prirodna osnova ............................................................................................................... 14 4.3. Ljudski resursi ................................................................................................................... 16 5. Gospodarstvo .......................................................................................................................... 21 5.1. Poljoprivreda ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1. OPĆI PODATCI 1.1. Geoprometni Položaj Brodsko-Posavska Županija
    1. OPĆI PODATCI 1.1. Geoprometni položaj Brodsko-posavska županija nalazi se u južnom dijelu Slavonske nizine, na prostoru između planina Psunj, Požeškog i Diljskog gorja sa sjevera i rijeke Save s juga, koja je ujedno i državna granica prema BiH u dužini od 163 km. Unutar Republike Hrvatske, Brodsko-posavska županija graniči na zapadu sa Sisačko-moslavačkom županijom, na sjeveru s Požeško-slavonskom, na sjeveroistoku s Osječko-baranjskom i na istoku s Vukovarsko-srijemskom županijom. Područje županije prostire se na 2034 km², što čini 3,59% ukupne površine Republike Hrvatske i zauzima 14. mjesto u Republici Hrvatskoj po površini među županijama. Brodsko-posavsku županiju obilježavaju dva osnovna cestovna pravca. Prvim, interkontinentalnim, u pravcu zapad-istok, povezane su zemlje zapadne Europe sa zemljama Bliskog istoka. Tim pravcem, a duž cijelog područja Županije, prolazi željeznička, cestovna, riječna i telekomunikacijska mreža te naftovod. Drugi inter-regionalni pravac, od sjevera prema jugu, spaja zemlje istočne i srednje Europe s Jadranom. U sastavu Brodsko-posavske županije nalazi se 28 jedinica lokalne samouprave i to 2 grada i 26 općina s ukupno 184 naselja. Slika 1. Brodsko-posavska županija Općina Bebrina sastoji se od naselja Banovci, Bebrina, Dubočac, Kaniža, Stupnički Kuti, Šumeće i Zbjeg. Prema popisu stanovništva iz 2011. godine, općina broji 3.244 stanovnika, raspoređenih na 971 kućanstvo te kao takva spada u općine s relativno niskom gustoćom naseljenosti sa do 50 stanovnika po kilometru kvadratnom. Općina se prostire na 100,32 km². Slika 2. Općina Bebrina Općina Bebrina teritorijalno graniči s općinom Oriovac na zapadu, općinama Bodski Stupnik i Sibinj na sjeveru te gradom Slavonskim Brodom na istoku.
    [Show full text]
  • PLEASE NOTE: This Book Contains Graphic Description of Inhuman Acts
    PLEASE NOTE: This book contains graphic description of inhuman acts committed by a small but unfortunately significant segment of the Serb nation. It is published for the information of politicians, diplomats, historians, soldiers, reporters and other professionals. Not recommended to the general public. To keep one's sanity it should be read with total professional detachment. Please read POSTSCRIPTUM on page 162 before you start reading the book. It will give you basic knowledge and better understanding of the true nature of the Partisan Warfare. The Publisher TITOIST ATROCITIES in VOJVODINA 1944-1945 SERBIAN VENDETTA IN BACSKA TIBOR CSERES HUNYADI PUBLISHING Copyright © Tibor Cseres 1993 All rights reserved First edition in the English Language Hunyadi Publishing Buffalo, NY - Toronto, Ont. Hungarian title: VERBOSSZU BACSKABAN Library of Congress Catalogue Card Number 92-76218 ISBN 1-882785-01-0 Manufactured in the United States of America 9 AUTHOR'S PREFACE TO THE ENGLISH EDITION At the end of World War I, the southern part of the thousand year old historical Hungary was occupied by Serbian troops. Under the terms of the Paris Peace Treaty in 1921 it was annexed to the Serbo-Croat-Slovenian Kingdom, that later became Yugoslavia. The new name of this territory, situated to the east of present Croatia, was VOJVODINA (also spelled Voivodina or Voyvodina). Its former Hungarian name had been Bacska and Banat. During World War II, in 1941, Germany occupied Yugoslavia. At the same time, Hungary took possession of and re-annexed VOJVODINA from divided Yugoslavia. At the end of 1944, the Serbs reoccupied Bacska, which has belonged to Serbia ever since.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorial of the Republic of Croatia
    INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE CASE CONCERNING THE APPLICATION OF THE CONVENTION ON THE PREVENTION AND PUNISHMENT OF THE CRIME OF GENOCIDE (CROATIA v. YUGOSLAVIA) MEMORIAL OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA ANNEXES REGIONAL FILES VOLUME 2 PART I EASTERN SLAVONIA 1 MARCH 2001 II CONTENTS ETHNIC STRUCTURES 1 Eastern Slavonia 3 Tenja 4 Antin 5 Dalj 6 Berak 7 Bogdanovci 8 Šarengrad 9 Ilok 10 Tompojevci 11 Bapska 12 Tovarnik 13 Sotin 14 Lovas 15 Tordinci 16 Vukovar 17 WITNESS STATEMENTS TENJA 19 Annex 1: Witness Statement of M.K. 21 Annex 2: Witness Statement of R.J. 22 Annex 3: Witness Statement of I.K. (1) 24 Annex 4: Witness Statement of J.P. 29 Annex 5: Witness Statement of L.B. 34 Annex 6: Witness Statement of P.Š. 35 Annex 7: Witness Statement of D.M. 37 Annex 8: Witness Statement of M.R. 39 Annex 9: Witness Statement of M.M. 39 Annex 10: Witness Statement of M.K. 41 Annex 11: Witness Statement of I.I.* 42 Annex 12: Witness Statement of Z.B. 52 Annex 13: Witness Statement of A.M. 54 Annex 14: Witness Statement of J.S. 56 Annex 15: Witness Statement of Z.M. 58 Annex 16: Witness Statement of J.K. 60 IV Annex 17: Witness Statement of L.R. 63 Annex 18: Witness Statement of Đ.B. 64 WITNESS STATEMENTS DALJ 67 Annex 19: Witness Statement of J.P. 69 Annex 20: Witness Statement of I.K. (2) 71 Annex 21: Witness Statement of A.K. 77 Annex 22: Witness Statement of H.S.
    [Show full text]
  • ODLUKA – Olujno Nevrijeme
    REPUBLIKA HRVATSKA BRODSKO-POSAVSKA ZUPANIJA ZUPAN KLASA: 320-12/20-01/14 UR. BROJ: 2178/1-04-20-1 Slavonski Brod, 07. kolovoza 2020. Na temelju clanka 23. Zakona 0 ublazavanju i uklanjanju posljedica prirodnih nepogoda ("Narodne novine" br. 16/19) i clanka 56. Statuta Brodsko-posavske zupanije ("Sluzbeni vjesnik Brodsko-posavske zupanije'' br. 15/13 - procisceni tekst), don 0 s im ODLUKU o proglasenju prirodne nepogode izazvane olujnim nevremenom, jakim vjetrom, obilnom kisom te tucom na gradevinskim i infrastrukturnim objektima te poljoprivrednim usjevima na podrueju Grada Slavonskog Broda i opcinama Bebrina, Brodski Stupnik, Oriovac, Sibinj i Podcrkavlje I Proglasavam prirodnu nepogodu na podrucju Grada Slavonskog Broda i opcinama Bebrina, Brodski Stupnik, Oriovac, Sibinj i Podcrkavlje zbog olujnog nevremena. Na navedenim podrucjima nanesene su velike materijalne stete na gradevinskim infrastrukturnim objektima te poljoprivrednim usjevima dana 04. kolovoza 2020. godine. II Pozivam sve ostecenike na navedenim podrucjima da prijave stetu nadleznom gradskom i opcinskim povjerenstvima u pisanom obliku, na propisanom obrascu, najkasnije u roku od osam dana od dana donosenja Odluke 0 proglasenju prirodne nepogode. III Obvezujem Gradsko i opcinska povjerenstva za procjenu steta od prirodnih nepogoda da unese sve zaprimljene prve procjene steta u Registar steta u roku od 15 dana od dana donosenja Odluke 0 proglasenju prirodne nepogode, a konacnu procjenu stete po svakom pojedinom osteceniku prijave zupanijskom povjerenstvu u roku od 50 dana od dana donosenja Odluke 0 proglasenju prirodne nepogode putem Registra steta. IV Obvezujem Zupanijsko povjerenstvo da prijavljene konacne procjene stete dostavi Drzavnom povjerenstvu i nadleznorn ministarstvu u roku od 60 dana od dana donosenja Odluke 0 proglasenju prirodne nepogode putem Registra steta, a prilikom konacne procjene prihvati iskljucivo procjene koje je obavilo Gradsko i opcinska povjerenstva.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorial of the Republic of Croatia
    INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE CASE CONCERNING THE APPLICATION OF THE CONVENTION ON THE PREVENTION AND PUNISHMENT OF THE CRIME OF GENOCIDE (CROATIA v. YUGOSLAVIA) MEMORIAL OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA APPENDICES VOLUME 5 1 MARCH 2001 II III Contents Page Appendix 1 Chronology of Events, 1980-2000 1 Appendix 2 Video Tape Transcript 37 Appendix 3 Hate Speech: The Stimulation of Serbian Discontent and Eventual Incitement to Commit Genocide 45 Appendix 4 Testimonies of the Actors (Books and Memoirs) 73 4.1 Veljko Kadijević: “As I see the disintegration – An Army without a State” 4.2 Stipe Mesić: “How Yugoslavia was Brought Down” 4.3 Borisav Jović: “Last Days of the SFRY (Excerpts from a Diary)” Appendix 5a Serb Paramilitary Groups Active in Croatia (1991-95) 119 5b The “21st Volunteer Commando Task Force” of the “RSK Army” 129 Appendix 6 Prison Camps 141 Appendix 7 Damage to Cultural Monuments on Croatian Territory 163 Appendix 8 Personal Continuity, 1991-2001 363 IV APPENDIX 1 CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS1 ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THE CHRONOLOGY BH Bosnia and Herzegovina CSCE Conference on Security and Co-operation in Europe CK SKJ Centralni komitet Saveza komunista Jugoslavije (Central Committee of the League of Communists of Yugoslavia) EC European Community EU European Union FRY Federal Republic of Yugoslavia HDZ Hrvatska demokratska zajednica (Croatian Democratic Union) HV Hrvatska vojska (Croatian Army) IMF International Monetary Fund JNA Jugoslavenska narodna armija (Yugoslav People’s Army) NAM Non-Aligned Movement NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organisation
    [Show full text]
  • Potentials and Prospects for Implementation of Renewable Energy Sources in Serbia
    Dragović, Nj. M., et al.: Potentials and Prospects for Implementation of Renewable ... THERMAL SCIENCE: Year 2019, Vol. 23, No. 5B, pp. 2895-2907 2895 POTENTIALS AND PROSPECTS FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES IN SERBIA by Njegoš M. DRAGOVIĆ *, Milovan D. VUKOVIĆ, and Dejan T. RIZNIĆ Technical Faculty in Bor, University of Belgrade, Bor, Serbia Original scientific paper https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI170312056D Serbia is dependent on imports of crude-oil and natural gas, but is endowed by reserves of lignite and the potential of renewable energy sources. Serbia has a strategy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the energy sector and to increase the share of renewable in gross final energy production 27% by 2020. Serbia’s total estimated technically usable potential of renewable energy sources is 5.65 Mtoe per year. Biomass has the highest potential for use in Serbia (3.448 Mtoe), followed by hydro power (1.679 Mtoe), solar energy (0.240 Mtoe), geother- mal energy (0.180 Mtoe), and wind energy (0.103 Mtoe). This paper presents the potential of renewable energy sources available in Serbia, with current status of their use and prospects for further exploitation. Key words: renewable energy, potential, utilization, sustainability, strategies Introduction There are global problems with pollution, GHG emissions, rising energy demand and dependency on energy imports. Energy resources have been classified into non-renewable (fos- sil fuels, uranium, nuclear, etc.) and renewable resources (solar, wind, biomass, geothermal, etc.). Limitations in the production of crude-oil, price changes, environmental pollution and unstable situation in the oil-exporting countries result in an ever growing interest to use RES.
    [Show full text]
  • The Small Religious Communities of Yugoslavia
    Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe Volume 3 Issue 6 Article 2 9-1983 The Small Religious Communities of Yugoslavia Rudolf Grulich Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ree Part of the Christianity Commons, and the Eastern European Studies Commons Recommended Citation Grulich, Rudolf (1983) "The Small Religious Communities of Yugoslavia," Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe: Vol. 3 : Iss. 6 , Article 2. Available at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ree/vol3/iss6/2 This Article, Exploration, or Report is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ George Fox University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ George Fox University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. l THE SMALL RELIGIOUS COMMUNITIES OF YUGOSLAVIA by Rudolf Grulich Th e Old Catholics Th e Croatian bishop Josip Jura j Stro ssmay er of Djakovo was th e most outspo ken oppon ent of th e dogma of papal infallibility at th e First Vatican Council , and also th e last bi shop to accept th e council 's decre es in 18 73, thr ee years aft er th e meet ing . Th ere was , how ever, no Old Catholic mov ement in th e Croatian dioc es es at that tim e, although th e situation was diff erent in th e German-sp eaking ar eas of middl e Europ e. This was becaus e the imp erial gov ernment in Vi enna was against th e Old Catholic mov ement .
    [Show full text]
  • 3. Osijek-Baranja County Basic Information
    CONTENTS 1. FOREWORD .........................................................................................................................................................5 Published by 2. REPUBLIC OF CROATIA ........................................................................................................................................7 Osijek - Baranja County 2.1. Basic information..............................................................................................................................................7 For publisher 2.2. Administrative and political structure ........................................................................................................7 Krešimir Bubalo, County prefect 2.3. Geographical position ....................................................................................................................................8 2.4. Economy .............................................................................................................................................................8 Developed by Center for Entrepreneurship Osijek 3. OSIJEK-BARANJA COUNTY ..................................................................................................................................9 3.1. Basic information ............................................................................................................................................10 Project coordination 3.2. Geographical position ...................................................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Vaso Jegdić Oliver Gradinac CITIES AS DESTINATIONS of URBAN
    DOI: 10.1515/aet-2016-0014 PRELIMINARY REPORT Vaso Jegdić CITIES AS DESTINATIONS Oliver OF URBAN ECOTOURISM: Gradinac The Case Study of Novi Sad* ABSTRACT: Ecotourism in an urban environment There are green complexes, available surfaces takes places in areas that offer a certain degree and abandoned objects and facilities of previous 155 of naturalness in a situation when they are economical activities located in the peripheral and Turistica, Et Acta Economica significantly modified by previous human suburban zone. In the immediate surroundings of activities. Concept of urban ecotourism recognizes Novi Sad, there are numerous messuages (Čenej the significance of ecotourism in facilitating messuages are in the city itself), that have been cultural exchange, environmental protection recently redecorated as eco and ethno oases. The and sustainable urban development. Contrary purpose of the paper is to suggest manners of their to classic ecodestinations, urban ecotourism is inclusion into the integral tourist product based on more acceptable considering a higher capacity of the research of resources for the development of 101-236 2, pp. 2 (2016), No. Vol urban destinations and the potential to renovate urban ecotourism in Novi Sad. The paper emploied locations that have been degraded by industrial, analytical-synthetic method, a combination of traffic or other human activities. The experiences secondary sources of literature data, internet, and and examples from Europe and North America other sources, with the primary data gained by field indicate that such projects significantly contribute observation, analyzing the content of advertising to a sustainable ecological and social-economical materials and contact through informal interviews development of many cities.
    [Show full text]