1 Deconstructing Alan Watt by Joseph Gallagher (2010) Contact author for any questions or comments here: [email protected] Introduction pg. 2-11 Alan's 6 Major Errors pg. 12 Chapter 1 pg. 13-34 Chapter 2 pg. 35-39 Chapter 3 pg. 40-66 Chapter 4 pg. 67-98 Chapter 5 pg. 99-112 Chapter 6 pg. 113-123 The B.M.R in the Bible pg. 124-153 Appendix pg. 154-160 2 Introduction After being a fan of Alan's for over 2 years, I now see him as a subtle NWO-Theosophist. Yes, in many areas, he's full of great information, pointing out various agenda-revealing writings (penned by even the elites themselves), and yes, he debunks the New Age/Theosophy and exposes Freemasonry- but when it comes to ancient history and religion, some of his assertions just don’t add up. In fact, after delving into some of his biggest claims, I began to realize that his views concerning Judaism and Christianity sounded a lot like the Freemasonic/Theosophical version of history. Alan is part of the higher-NWO agenda of finally dismantling all of the religions. First, I want to focus on 6 huge errors committed by Alan in the field of ancient history and religion, then I'll go through his 3 'Cutting Through' books and his 'Waiting For the Miracle' (the published transcript of his '24-hour Lecture Series on Ancient History and Religion'- done in 1998 while guesting on Jackie Patru's 'Sweet Liberty' show. The 6 errors committed by Alan reveal him to be a propagandist of sorts for Freemasonry &Theosophy, and confirms that he indeed gives out bunk historical info, and his 3 'Cutting Through' books show that he perhaps even gives out plagiarized info (via Glen Kealey). Alan incessantly maintains that the Mystery Religion is behind all religions, thus, the Freemasons (the ancient priesthood) have made all of the world's religions, but if that's not true, if the Mystery Religion has not in fact been behind every major religious movement of the past few thousand years, than Alan would be guilty of promoting Freemasonry. He'd be subtly amplifying their scope and reach, glorifying them by making it seem like they've always been the directors and custodians of Mankind's spiritual, technological, and societal progress. When Alan specifically lists all of the Freemasonically inspired trinity-esque religions in his first 'Cutting Through' book (on pg. 54) - calling them the 'Old Time Freemason Religions'- he doesn’t even mention the Babylonian trinity (instead, he focuses on the Egyptian one (and I'll answer why later) (though he does mention it (the B.M.R) in his interviews with Jackie). When he's asked specifically by Jackie at the end of the 1st chapter in 'Waiting For the Miracle' about the meaning of the 'Let the brother receive the Light' phrase from Freemasonry, he fails to mention to that mostly Christian audience that 'the Light' refers to none other than Lucifer (as I'll show with a host of famous Freemason and theosophist quotes in Chapter 7). Juxtapose that with Alan's admission in the introduction to his 'Waiting For the Miracle' that the shows were done "as a form of deprogramming, very gradual deprogramming, to an audience who swallowed reality as it had been presented to them from childhood" (pg. 5 - 'Waiting For the Miracle - 1998) - makes it clear that he withheld that nugget of truth because he knew that it would only end up fuelling their Christian fire (though he did start dishing out the Lucifer connection by 2004). In hindsight, Alan's interpretation of the Bible and history that he initially imparted in 1998 upon that 'Sweet Liberty' audience meshed (for some strange coincidence I guess) with the Freemasonic/Theosophical-view-for- dummies. So what specifically led me to question Alan? It was in the summer of 2009, when I 3 became aware of the Glen Kealey affair and the problem that he had with Andre and the Outlaw Forum. How he presented his side of the story concerning both issues whilst on-air only served to validate my suspicions. I also began to question Alan's evolution upon the radio- waves, trying to see from another angle why his view on Jesus in 1998 was so different from the one that he later espoused to callers on his own show in 2008. When he first appeared on Jackie's show, Alan made it seem like he believed in the existence of Jesus the Man, saying that he knew about the Mysteries etc., as he also gave an esoteric rendition for all of the Bible's key stories and characters (thereby linking it to the Mystery Religion and astro-theology) (and as far as how Jackie and Alan met, she said that he called her up one day out-of-the-blue, told her that he had been listening to her show, and that she "almost had the truth")- but in Oct 2007, before I had heard Alan's and Jackie's interviews (when I was just getting into him), I remember hearing him tell George Noory that Jesus the Man never even existed (and I had no problem with that, as I had already seen Zeitgeist a few months earlier, and had begun to believe that notion myself). About a half a year later, in May 2008, after I had already heard Alan tell a few callers on his own show that Jesus the Man never existed (and after I had ordered from him his '24-hour lecture series on Ancient History and Religion', as well as his 'Waiting For the Miracle', 3 ‘Cutting Through’ Books, and two DVDs)- I then began to hear him tell Jackie's audience (for the first time) that Jesus had knowledge of the Mysteries, that the story of him being taken into Egypt as a baby shows that he was connected to the Mystery Religion etc. I remember thinking at the time, 'why not tell them the real truth, namely, that he never even existed?' But obviously, the answer to my question would have been that Alan was only trying to "deprogram them" (in other words, help them, free them from their conditioning etc). (Jackie: You said that he had studied the mysteries and he became a renegade? Alan: He was openly (I say openly) but it was for those amongst the listeners who could understand the esoteric behind the stories that he was getting, but he was getting it out to the public and these were sacred things that were to be kept for the inner religion" - (Alan Watt on "Sweet Liberty" with Jackie Patru Dec. 8th 2004). But in Sept 2009, well after Zeitgeist Addendum had been exposed as NWO propaganda, and after the Glen Kealey affair had become public knowledge, I started to do more research into ancient history, Theosophy, and the Freemasons. I started to notice 6 huge errors in Alan's work (in fact, had noticed small errors here and there since 2008), and given that Alan is tremendously smart, couldn’t fathom how he could of made them (unless, of course, they were deliberate distortions). His 6 major errors made his 'I-want-to-deprogram-them-assertion' take on a whole new twist. Though Alan does point us toward great sources of information, when it comes to some of his grandest claims made in his 'Cutting Through Vol 1' (1999), we have to remember that we're never even presented with any footnotes or references that could back up what he says. On pg. 11 (the title says 'History and Religion'), he writes that "Humankind, in its present form, is over 190,000 years old", and that, "during the sixteen thousand years that comprised the last ice-age, ancient earthborn Troglodytes had already achieved and continue to 4 possess to this very day a superior level of technological advancement to our own- within numerous fields of human endeavour- including fresh water diversion, hydraulics, plumbing, hydroponic gardening, transportation, communications, genetics, computing, optics, lasers and holography". On pg. 20, he says that "Jubal Freemasonry was formed 60,000 years ago"- apparently, when the Trogs created a kind of lay secret society, comprised of important generals and rulers from various regions around the world (binding their allegiance through oaths promising death if ever broken). So according to Alan, for tens of thousands of years, advanced cave-dwelling Trogs have either been manipulating nations from around the world to war with each other (through Freemasonry), or have engineered huge environmental catastrophes to wipe the face of the Earth clean every once in a while (bringing us back down to a basic level, and then having us repopulate it, again). So it must be stressed how this kind of far-fetched bullshit via Alan is never even qualified, and he gives no documentation or references whatsoever to back it all up. Turns out though, the Trogs stem from Kealey (as well as the Masonic encoding of the English language, the genetic engineering of the human race etc) (Alan actually put pictures and layouts taken from Kealey’s published newsletters into his 3 ‘Cutting Through’ books) - but it's quite clear from Alan's narrative and choice of wording on pg. 11 (when he says that Trogs have developed advanced technologies since at least the last Ice Age) that that is in fact his own personal view. But looking at the bigger picture, where in fact does his view and the Freemasonic one even begin and end? Wouldn't it be logical to assume that Freemasonry would love to have us think that Trogs exist? Or that secret societies have been running the show behind the scenes for Ages? It would have the desired effect on truth- seekers, no doubt, as most would think, “how could I ever change anything if they’ve been secretly controlling the world for tens of thousands of years, have genetically engineered the human race, and created all of our religions and holy books?” (“Remember that ‘priests’ wrote the ‘holy books’ of all peoples” (pg.