DOCSLIB.ORG

Hydrogeology of the Region of Greenwich Township, Gloucester County

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hydrogeology of the Region of Greenwich Township, Gloucester County HYDROGEOLOGY OF THE REGION OF GREENWICH TOWNSHIP, GLOUCESTER COUNTY, NEW JERSEY By Cynthia Barton and Jane Kozinski U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 90-4198 Prepared in cooperation with GREENWICH TOWNSHIP, NEW JERSEY, and the NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION West Trenton, New Jersey 1991 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN, JR., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information Copies ( )f this report can be write to: purchasesd from: District Chief U.S. Ge( )logical Survey U.S. Geological Survey Books at id Open-File Reports Section Mountain View Office Park Box 254^!5 810 Bear Tavern Road Denver '. ^ederal Center Suite 206 Denver , CO 80225 West Trenton. NJ 08698 CONTENTS Page Glossary........................................................... ix Abstract........................................................... 1 Introduction....................................................... 2 Purpose and scope............................................. 2 Previous investigations....................................... 4 Well-numbering system......................................... 4 Acknowledgments............................................... 5 Description of study area.......................................... 5 Location and physiography..................................... 5 Climate....................................................... 6 Methods of study................................................... 6 Hydrogeology.................................................. 6 Hydrologic conditions......................................... 11 Hydrogeology....................................................... 12 Upper Cenozoic deposits ....................................... 12 Englishtown aquifer system.................................... 14 Merchantville-Woodbury confining unit......................... 16 Potomac-Raritan-Magothy aquifer system........................ 17 Upper aquifer............................................ 19 Confining unit between the upper and middle aquifers..... 20 Middle aquifer........................................... 20 Confining unit between the middle and lower aquifers..... 25 Lower aquifer............................................ 26 Bedrock....................................................... 27 Hydrologic conditions .............................................. 28 Surface water................................................. 28 Ground water.................................................. 30 Withdrawals.............................................. 30 Occurrence and flow...................................... 37 Water table......................................... 37 Englishtown aquifer system.......................... 38 Potomac-Raritan-Magothy aquifer system.............. 39 Water-level fluctuations................................. 44 Water budget.................................................. 49 Ground-water recharge.................................... 50 River recharge........................................... 52 Lateral flow............................................. 53 Vertical leakage......................................... 54 Base flow, discharge to wetlands, and pumpage............ 54 Summary and conclusions ............................................ 56 References cited................................................... 59 in ILLUSTRATIONS Page Plate Maps showing: a. Locations of wells, traces of hydrogeologic and geophysical sections, and heads of tide of streams in the region of Greenwich Township, Gloucester County, New Jersey................ in pocket b. Approximate outcrops or subcrops of hydrogeo­ logic units in the region of Greenwich Town­ ship, Gloucester County, New Jersey.......... Hydrogeologic sections through the region of Greenwich Township, Gloucester County, New Jersey: a. Hydrogeologic section A-A' in pocket b. Hydrogeologic section B-B' c. Hydrogeologic section C-C' d. Hydrogeologic section D-D' Maps showing: a. Upper Cenozoic deposits in :he region of Greenwich Township, Gloucester County, New Jersey.................. in pocket b. Altitude of the top of the Merchantville- Woodbury confining unit in the region of Greenwich Township, Gloucester County, New Jersey........................................ Maps showing: a. Altitude of the top of the upper aquifer of the Potomac-Raritan-Magothy aquifer system in the region of Greenwich Township, Gloucester County, New Jersey............................ in pocket b. Altitude of the top of the confining unit between the upper and middle aquifers of the Potomac-Raritan-Magothy aquifer system in the region of Greenwich Township, Gloucester County, New Jersey............................ Maps showing: a. Altitude of the top of the upper part of the middle aquifer of the Potomac-Raritan-Magothy aquifer system in the reg:.on of Greenwich Township, Gloucester County, New Jersey....... in pocket b. Altitude of the top of the confining unit dividing the middle aquifer of the Potomac- Raritan-Magothy aquifer system in the region of Greenwich Township, Gloucester County, New Jersey....................................... IV ILLUSTRATIONS - -Continued Page Plate 6. Maps showing: a. Altitude of the top of the lower part of the middle aquifer of the Potomac-Raritan-Magothy aquifer system in the region of Greenwich Township, Gloucester County, New Jersey........ in pocket b. Altitude of the top of the confining unit between the middle and lower aquifers of the Potomac-Raritan-Magothy aquifer system in the region of Greenwich Township, Gloucester County, New Jersey............................. 7. Maps showing: a. Altitude of the top of the lower aquifer of the Potomac-Raritan-Magothy aquifer system in the region of Greenwich Township, Gloucester County, New Jersey............................. in pocket b. Configuration of the bedrock surface in the region of Greenwich Township, Gloucester County, New Jersey............................. 8. Maps showing: a. Distribution of ground-water withdrawals from the upper aquifer of the Potomac-Raritan- Magothy aquifer system in the region of Greenwich Township, Gloucester County, New Jersey, 1986 ................................... in pocket b. Distribution of ground-water withdrawals from the middle aquifer of the Potomac-Raritan- Magothy aquifer system in the region of Greenwich Township, Gloucester County, New Jersey, 1986................................... 9. Maps showing: a. Distribution of ground-water withdrawals from the lower aquifer of the Potomac-Raritan- Magothy aquifer system in the region of Greenwich Township, Gloucester County, New Jersey, 1986................................... in pocket b. Potentiometric surface of the Englishtown aquifer system in the region of Greenwich Township, Gloucester County, New Jersey, August to September 1986....................... 10. Map and diagram showing: a. Potentiometric surface of the upper aquifer of the Potomac-Raritan-Magothy aquifer system in the region of Greenwich Township, Gloucester County, New Jersey, August to September 1986...in pocket b. Potentiometric surface of the undifferentiated and the lower part of the middle aquifer of the Potomac-Raritan-Magothy aquifer system in the region of Greenwich Township, Gloucester County, New Jersey, August to September 1986... v ILLUSTRATIONS--Continued Page 11. Map and diagram showing: Potentiometric surface of the lower aquifer of the Potomac-Raritan-Magothy aquifer system in the region of Greenwich Township, Gloucester County, New Jersey, August to September 1986., in pocket b. Analytical methods used to calculate lateral flow across boundaries of: the middle aquifer of the Potomac-Raritan-Magothy aquifer system in the region of Greenwich Township, Gloucester County, New Jersey................. Figure 1 Map showing location of the region of Greenwich Town­ ship, Gloucester County, New Jcsrsey. 3 Graph showing annual precipitation at Marcus Hook, Pennsylvania, weather station, 1931-86............. 7 3. Idealized hydrogeologic sections illustrating ground- water flow in the region of Greenwich Township, Gloucester County, New Jersey........................ 15 a. From Tinicum Township, Pennsylvania, to Greenwich Township, New Jersey..... 15 b. From Chester, Pennsylvania, to Logan Township, New Jersey.................................. 15 Map showing distribution of ground-water withdrawals from upper Cenozoic deposits in the region of Greenwich Township, Gloucester County, New Jersey, 1986............... 35 Graphs showing ground-water withdrawals in the region of Greenwich Township, Gloucester County, New Jersey: a. Total ground-water use and ground-water use by type, 1956-86.......... 36 Seasonal fluctuations in ground-water use, 1983. 36 c. Total ground-water use and ground-water use by aquifer, Potomac-Raritan-Magothy aquifer system, 1956-86....... 36 Water-level hydrographs of selected wells in the region of Greenwich Township, Gloucester County, New Jersey: a. Hydrograph of well 15-323, water years 1949-86. 45 b. Hydrograph of well 15-296, 1983....... 45 c. Hydrograph of well 15-620, May 31-June 4, 1986. 45 TABLES Table 1. Geologic and hydrogeologic units in the region of Greenwich Township, Gloucester County, New Jersey.. 2. Altitudes of the tops of aquifers and confining units in the region of Greenwich Towr.ship Gloucester County, New Jersey.......... 63 vi TABLES--Continued Page Table 3. Selected records of wells and borings used to determine the hydrogeologic framework of the region of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • James G. Landis
    TOMAHAWKS TO PEACE an Indian saga volume three James G. Landis TOMAHAWKS TO PEACE VOLUME THREE OF A SEVEN - PART SERIES Glikkikan, a Delaware war chief, orator, and head counselor to the chiefs of the nation, brings to light the hidden causes of the Delaware resistance popularly known as Pontiac’s Rebellion. “Love the truth, live in peace.” © 2017 by TGS International, a wholly owned subsidiary of Christian Aid Ministries, Berlin, Ohio. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used, reproduced, or stored in any retrieval system, in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, without written permission from the publisher except for brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. ISBN: 978-1-943929-92-4 soft cover 978-1-943929-93-1 hard cover Illustrations by Coleen B. Barnhart Printed in China Published by: TGS International P.O. Box 355 Berlin, Ohio 44610 USA Phone: 330.893.4828 Fax: 330.893.2305 TGS001448 www.tgsinternational.com Dedication Dale Heisey My dear friend and brother who: » first told me of David Zeisberger, the veteran Moravian missionary to the Indians. » taught me that a straight line to the truth is the shortest way there. » demonstrates compelling oratory. » holds to the unbounded truth. » lives to follow Christ at any cost. —James G. Landis »v« Overview of The Conquest Series AMERICAN HISTORY THROUGH INDIAN EYES -James G. Landis LENAPE HOMELAND Volume I This story tells the early history of the Delaware Indians and the coming of the white man to the Delaware River Valley as witnessed by Lenape heroes.
    [Show full text]
  • Final ERI Draft
    Deptford Township Environmental Resource Inventory DRAFT April 2010 The Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission is dedicated to uniting the region’s elected officials, planning professionals and the public with the common vision of making a great region even greater. Shaping the way we live, work and play, DVRPC builds consensus on improving transportation, promoting smart growth, protecting the environment, and enhancing the economy. We serve a diverse region of nine counties: Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery and Philadelphia in Pennsylvania; and Burlington, Camden, Gloucester and Mercer in New Jersey. DVRPC is the official Metropolitan Planning Organization for the Greater Philadelphia Region — leading the way to a better future. The symbol in our logo is adapted from the official DVRPC seal, and is designed as a stylized image of the Delaware Valley. The circular shape symbolizes the region as a whole. The diagonal line represents the Delaware River and the two adjoining crescents represent the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the State of New Jersey. DVRPC is funded by a variety of funding sources including federal grants from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA), the Pennsylvania and New Jersey departments of transportation, as well as by DVRPC’s state and local member governments. The authors, however, are solely responsible for the findings and conclusions herein, which may not represent the official views or policies of the funding agencies. DVRPC fully complies with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and related statutes and regulations in all programs and activities. DVRPC’s website may be translated into Spanish, Russian and Traditional Chinese online by visiting www.dvrpc.org.
    [Show full text]
  • North Atlantic Ocean
    210 ¢ U.S. Coast Pilot 3, Chapter 6 26 SEP 2021 75°W 74°30'W Chart Coverage in Coast Pilot 3—Chapter 6 NOAA’s Online Interactive Chart Catalog has complete chart coverage http://www.charts.noaa.gov/InteractiveCatalog/nrnc.shtml Trenton 75°30'W 12314 P ENNSYLV ANIA Philadelphia 40°N 12313 Camden E R I V R E R Wilmington A W A L E D NEW JERSEY 12312 SALEM RIVER CHESAPEAKE & DELAWARE CANAL 39°30'N 12304 12311 Atlantic City MAURICE RIVER DELAWARE BAY 39°N 12214 CAPE MAY INLET DELAWARE 12216 Lewes Cape Henlopen NORTH ATL ANTIC OCEAN INDIAN RIVER INLET 38°30'N 26 SEP 2021 U.S. Coast Pilot 3, Chapter 6 ¢ 211 Delaware Bay (1) This chapter describes Delaware Bay and River and (10) Mileages shown in this chapter, such as Mile 0.9E their navigable tributaries and includes an explanation of and Mile 12W, are the nautical miles above the Delaware the Traffic Separation Scheme at the entrance to the bay. Capes (or “the Capes”), referring to a line from Cape May Major ports covered are Wilmington, Chester, Light to the tip of Cape Henlopen. The letters N, S, E, or Philadelphia, Camden and Trenton, with major facilities W, following the numbers, denote by compass points the at Delaware City, Deepwater Point and Marcus Hook. side of the river where each feature is located. Also described are Christina River, Salem River, and (11) The approaches to Delaware Bay have few off-lying Schuylkill River, the principal tributaries of Delaware dangers. River and other minor waterways, including Mispillion, (12) The 100-fathom curve is 50 to 75 miles off Delaware Maurice and Cohansey Rivers.
    [Show full text]
  • Paulsboro Marine Terminal Phase I Underwater Archeological Survey
    PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DESCRIPTION FOR THE POSITION OF: Paulsboro Marine Terminal Phase I Underwater Archeological Survey SUBMISSION DEADLINE: July 9, 2010 at 1:00 P.M. FAIR AND OPEN PUBLIC SOLICITATION PROCESS FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR GLOUCESTER COUNTY IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY 109 BUDD BOULEVARD WOODBURY, NEW JERSEY 08096 1 | Page Technical Report, Obstruction Survey for Future Activites at the Port of Paulsboro Gloucester County, New Jersey SPONSOR Gloucester County Improvement Authority 254 County House Road Clarksboro, NJ 08020 DRAFT SURVEY COMPANY Aqua Survey Inc. 469 Point Breeze Rd. Flemington, NJ 08822 ASI Project Number 29-132 October 15, 2009 Technical Report, Obstruction Survey for Future Activites at the Port of Paulsboro Gloucester County, New Jersey SPONSOR Gloucester County Improvement Authority 254 County House Road Clarksboro, NJ 08020 ASI Project Number 29-132 DRAFT This report, as well as all records and raw data were audited and found to be an accurate reflection of the study. Copies of raw data will be maintained by Aqua Survey, Inc., 469 Point Breeze Road, Flemington, NJ 08822. Kenneth Hayes Date President Mark Padover Date Lead Field Scientist Table of Contents I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 1 II. MATERIALS, METHODS, AND RESULTS ................................................................... 4 A. Project Area .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 State of the Delaware River Basin Report
    STATE OF THEBASIN2019 Water’s journey through the park. Photo credit: Kevin Haines. Message from the Executive Director I am pleased to report that the state of the water resources of the Delaware River Basin is generally good and improving. The Commission’s State of the Basin Report 2019 – our third such publication since 2004 – benchmarks conditions and tracks progress toward achieving key DRBC water resource management goals for maintaining an adequate supply of suitable quality water to meet the diverse needs of our region for public water supply, recreation, industry, commerce, agriculture, and aquatic life. This year’s report provides a detailed evaluation – essentially, a focused snapshot – of 31 indicators for watersheds and landscapes, water quantity, water quality, and living resources, and includes a rating and a directional trend for each. A majority of the indicators received a “Good” or “Very Good” rating, while trends are predominantly “Improving” or “Stable.” Lower ratings or declining trends for some indicators show us where additional study and stewardship are required. This 2019 evaluation reflects the collective effort of organizations and individuals throughout the Basin to improve the invaluable water resources we share. It also highlights water resource challenges for the Basin associated with climate change and includes recommendations and directions for addressing future challenges. The preamble to the Delaware River Basin Compact begins with recognition by the four Basin states and the Federal government that: the water and related resources of the Delaware River Basin [are] regional assets vested with local, State and National interests, for which [the Commission’s members] have joint responsibility.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 NJ Bald Eagle Project Report
    New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Division of Fish and Wildlife Dave Golden, Director John Heilferty, Chief Endangered and Nongame Species Program New Jersey Bald Eagle Project, 2019 Prepared by: Larissa Smith and Kathleen E. Clark Project Staff: Kathleen Clark, Larissa Smith, Erica Miller, John Heilferty, Robert Somes, Ben Wurst, Brian Henderson, William Pitts CONTENTS Summary 3 Introduction 3 Methods Nest Survey 5 Winter and Roost Surveys 6 Results Nest Survey 6 Nesting Season Highlights 17 Telemetry 17 Resightings of Banded Eagles 18 Recoveries of Eagles in NJ 20 Acknowledgments 22 Literature Cited 23 Cover photo by Bob Kane, Middlesex County, NJ New Jersey Bald Eagle Project Report, 2019 2 New Jersey Bald Eagle Project, 2019 Prepared by: Larissa Smith and Kathleen Clark Project personnel: Kathleen Clark, Larissa Smith, Robert Somes, Erica Miller, John Heilferty, Brian Henderson, William Pitts, and Ben Wurst Summary The Division of Fish and Wildlife’s Endangered and Nongame Species Program (ENSP) biologists, Conserve Wildlife Foundation (CWF) staff, and volunteer observers located and monitored bald eagle nests and territories. Two hundred eleven nest sites were monitored during the nesting season, of which 190 were documented to be active (with eggs) and 21 were territorial or housekeeping pairs. Twenty-seven new eagle pairs were found this season, 19 in the south, three in central and five in the north. One hundred forty-eight nests (80%) of the 184 known-outcome nests produced 249 young, for a productivity rate of 1.35 young per active/known-outcome nest. Thirty-five nests (18%) failed to produce. The Delaware Bay region remained the state’s eagle stronghold, with roughly half of nests located in Cumberland and Salem counties and the bayside of Cape May County.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. SWAT Oil Spill Toolkit
    OilSpillToolKit ForCitizensMonitoringEmergencies PhotoscourtesyoftheNationalOceanicandAtmosphericAdministration(NOAA) New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Delaware Riverkeeper Network FundingprovidedbyUSEnvironmentalProtectionAgency,Region2 AlthoughthedevelopmentofthistoolkithasbeenfundedinpartbytheUnitedStatesEnvironmentalProtectionAgencyRegion2,ithasnotbeensubject totheAgency’srequiredpeerandpolicyreviewandthereforedoesnotnecessarilyreflecttheviewsoftheAgencyandnoofficialendorsementshouldbeinferred. Informationpresentedinthistoolkitisconsideredpublicinformationandmaybedistributedorcopied.Useoftheappropriatebyline/photo/imagecreditisrequested. Contents TheStoryofAthosIand 1 AMessagefromtheDelawareRiverkeeper Introduction NationalResponseSystem 2 Adescriptionofwhathappenswhenaspilloccurs. ReportingPollutionIncidents 4 Alistofnumbersandinformationtohaveonhandwhenreportinganewoilspill. VolunteerMonitoringCoordinatorRole 5 Atipsheetforemergencyresponsemonitoring. Appendices 8 AppendixI-TipSheets OilAssessmentTipsforInitialOilEvaluation 9 Atipsheettobehandedouttovolunteerstohelpthemperforminitialassessments aftertheoilspill. OilAssessmentTipsforResidualOilEvaluation 11 Atipsheettobehandedouttovolunteerstohelpthemperformaresidualassessment 2+monthsaftertheoilspill. AppendixII-FieldAssessmentSheets OilContaminationAssessmentSheet 13 Eachvolunteershouldusethissheettoindexeachoftheirsites. QuickShorelineAssessmentForm 15 Oneofthesesheetsshouldbefilledoutateachsiteduringeachvisit. WildlifeAssessmentForm 16 Thisformshouldbefilledoutateachsitewhereoiledwildlifeisobserved.
    [Show full text]
  • NJDEP-N.J.A.C. 7:9B-Surface Water Quality Standards
    THIS IS A COURTESY COPY OF THIS RULE. ALL OF THE DEPARTMENT'S RULES ARE COMPILED IN TITLE 7 OF THE NEW JERSEY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. N. J. A. C. 7:9B Surface Water Quality Standards Statutory Authority: N.J.S.A. 58:10A-1 et seq., 58:11A-1 et seq., and 13:1D-1 et seq. Re-adopted: October 17, 2016 Last Amended - April 6, 2020 (52 N.J.R.711(a )) For regulatory history and effective dates, see the New Jersey Administrative Code Table of Contents 7:9B-1.1 Scope of subchapter 7:9B-1.2 Construction 7:9B-1.3 Severability 7:9B-1.4 Definitions 7:9B-1.5 Statements of policy 7:9B-1.6 Establishment of water quality-based effluent limitations 7:9B-1.7 Waterway loadings in areawide water quality management plans 7:9B-1.8 Procedures for modifying water quality-based effluent limitations for individual dischargers to Category One waters 7:9B-1.9 Procedures for modifying water quality-based effluent limitations for individual dischargers to Category Two waters 7:9B-1.10 Procedures for reclassifying specific segments for less restrictive uses 7:9B-1.11 Procedures for reclassifying specific segments for more restrictive uses 7:9B-1.12 Designated uses of FW1, PL, FW2, SE1, SE2, SE3, and SC waters 7:9B-1.13 Designated uses of mainstem Delaware River and Delaware Bay 7:9B-1.14 Surface water quality criteria 7:9B-1.15 Surface water classifications for the waters of the State of New Jersey THIS IS A COURTESY COPY OF THIS RULE.
    [Show full text]
  • Delaware Estuary Salinity Model Validation
    Philadelphia Water Department Watershed Protection Program Delaware Estuary Salinity Model Validation May 2020 Philadelphia Water Department May 2020 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Numerical Model ........................................................................................................................... 1 2.1 Model Objectives ........................................................................................................................ 1 2.2 Modeling Approach ................................................................................................................... 1 2.3 Study Area .................................................................................................................................. 3 2.4 Salinity Conversion Methods ................................................................................................... 5 2.5 Boundary Conditions ................................................................................................................ 5 2.5.1 Tributaries ........................................................................................................................... 5 2.5.2 Open Boundary Condition -Salinity .............................................................................. 18 2.5.3 CSOs ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • EDWARD Evans and the ORIGINS of AMERICAN METHODISM The
    Methodist History, 47:1 (October 2008) “That DEAR MAN OF GOD:” Edward EVANS AND THE ORIGINS OF AMERICAN METHODISM JOSEPH F. DIPAOLO The rise of American Methodism is largely the story of self-motivated laypeople whose experience of God’s redeeming grace compelled them to preach and organize societies, which later were linked together to form the earliest connection. Names that come readily to mind include Thomas Webb, Barbara Heck and, above all, Robert Strawbridge, whose indepen- dent, evangelical spirit neither required nor willingly accepted much direc- tion from superiors.1 The story of another of these earliest pioneers may now be told. Edward Evans of Philadelphia may well be the rightful possessor of the title “First American-born itinerant,”2 but he may also have been much more. What remains of Evans’ life and legacy must be assembled from tan- talizing scraps, including a 1770 autobiographical letter that he sent to John Wesley. Yet put together, these sources tell the story of a passionate and dis- ciplined lay evangelist, whose independent spirit and itinerant labors parallel those of Strawbridge. Evans developed personal and spiritual connections with George Whitefield, Peter Böhler, Nicholas Von Zinzendorf and August Spangenberg, all of whom played important roles in the lives of the Wesleys. Moreover, as a member of the founding boards of trustees of Whitefield’s Academy (1740), the first Moravian Church in Philadelphia (1743) and Historic St. George’s (1769), Evans’ life opens an fascinating window into the dynamic, trans-denominational, and fluid spirit of early Methodism when it was still a movement, and not yet a church.
    [Show full text]
  • Conrail Freight Train Derailment with Vinyl Chloride Release Paulsboro, New Jersey November 30, 2012
    Conrail Freight Train Derailment with Vinyl Chloride Release Paulsboro, New Jersey November 30, 2012 Accident Report NTSB/RAR-14/01 National PB2014-108828 Transportation Safety Board NTSB/RAR-14/01 PB2014-108820 Notation 8475A Adopted July 29, 2014 Railroad Accident Report Conrail Freight Train Derailment with Vinyl Chloride Release Paulsboro, New Jersey November 30, 2012 National Transportation Safety Board 490 L’Enfant Plaza, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20594 National Transportation Safety Board. 2014. Conrail Freight Train Derailment with Vinyl Chloride Release, Paulsboro, New Jersey, November 30, 2012. Publication Type NTSB/RAR-14/01. Washington, DC. Abstract: This report discusses the 2012 accident in which a Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail) train derailed while traveling over a moveable bridge in Paulsboro, New Jersey. Three tank cars containing vinyl chloride came to rest in Mantua Creek, of which one was breached and released about 20,000 gallons of vinyl chloride. On that day, 28 residents sought medical attention for possible exposure, and the train crew and many emergency responders were also exposed. Damage estimates were $451,000 for equipment and about $30 million for emergency response and remediation. This report addresses safety issues: training and qualification of train crews for moveable bridge inspection; Conrail safety management; timeliness of hazardous materials communications to first responders; failure of the incident commanders to follow established hazardous materials response protocols; firefighter training
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter Volume 6 Issue 3 March 2008
    Next Meeting 7:30 p.m. Wenonah Historical Society Friday March 14, 2008 Newsletter Volume 6 Issue 3 March 2008 Message From can enjoy and it will certainly provide interpretation and analysis. This will Vice President a great opportunity to work with the be the “Show and Tell” part of the Barbara Capelli Wenonah Elementary School and meeting. additional volunteers to see that this Dear Members; The History of Wenonah day will be another great reflection on This Friday’s meeting is sure to be by Marjorie K. Lentz the pride we all share about our town! a crowd pleaser and we are expecting During the mid-1970’s the a super crowd at that! So, come early Historical Fact Wenonah Historical Society, wanting and make sure to get your seat! Also Our neighbor to the south, Sewell, to do something for the Bicentennial be sure to tell your friends and NJ was named after William Sewell, a decided a book about the origins of neighbors…bring the kids! General in the Civil War and Wenonah would be an excellent way Another matter of importance, the President of the West Jersey Railroad. of both participating in the event, and Historical Society is taking a He was substantially involved in the creating a fund-raiser for the Society. significant role in the creation of a creation of Wenonah. Marjorie Lentz volunteered to author Founder’s Day in Wenonah Park on such a book. It was completed and June 5th. We are looking for WHS OFFICERS 2008 published in 1976. She did a fantastic volunteers and anyone interested in President Louis McCall job, the project was a success, the speaking about the history of entire printing sold out and there are Wenonah! Vice Pres.
    [Show full text]