Coal Transition in South Africa Understanding the Implications of a 2Oc-Compatible Coal Phase-Out Plan for South Africa a Project Funded by the KR Foundation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Coal Transition in South Africa Understanding the Implications of a 2Oc-Compatible Coal Phase-Out Plan for South Africa a Project Funded by the KR Foundation Coal transitions in South Africa Understanding the implications of a 2oC-compatible coal phase-out plan for South Africa 2018 Authors Jesse Burton, Tara Caetano, Bryce McCall Coal transition in South Africa Understanding the implications of a 2oC-compatible coal phase-out plan for South Africa A project funded by the KR Foundation Authors Jesse Burton, Tara Caetano, Bryce McCall Cite this report as Burton, J. et al. (2018). Coal transition in South Africa - Understanding the implications of a 2°C-compatible coal phase-out for South Africa. IDDRI & Climate Strategies. Acknowledgments The project team is grateful to the KR Foundation for its financial support. The authors are grateful to those who reviewed the report. Contact information Oliver Sartor, IDDRI, [email protected] Andrzej Błachowicz, Climate Strategies, [email protected] Jesse Burton [email protected] Tara Caetano [email protected] Bryce McCall [email protected] Copyright © 2018 IDDRI and Climate Strategies IDDRI and Climate Strategies encourage reproduction and communication of their copyrighted materials to the public, with proper credit (bibliographical reference and/or corresponding URL), for personal, corporate or public policy research, or educational purposes. However, IDDRI and Climate Strategies copyrighted materials are not for commercial use or dissemination (print or electronic). Unless expressly stated otherwise, the findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in the materials are those of the various authors and are not necessarily those of IDDRI’s board or Climate Strategies Board/Secretariat. Publishers: IDDRI and Climate Strategies Editors: Pierre Barthélemy, Andrzej Błachowicz, Oliver Sartor Graphic design: Alain Chevallier, Ivan Pharabod Coal transition in South Africa Understanding the implications of a 2oC-compatible coal phase-out plan for South Africa Executive summary 4 The scenarios 4 Employment in coal mining decreases 4 Implementing NDCs 5 Opportunities and challenges 5 Introduction 7 Coal in the national context 8 Role of coal in the national energy system 8 Reserves and resources 8 Dynamics of the local market 8 Dynamics of the export market 9 Role of coal in national GHG emissions 10 Role of coal in the economy 10 Employment in the coal sector 10 Coal-related investments 13 Policy aspects of the transition 14 Primary cost increases and energy security risks in coal 15 National debates on the future of coal 17 Coal transition scenarios for South Africa 19 Quantitative coal scenarios 20 Current NDC-based scenario and implications for coal 21 2oC consistent coal transition scenarios for South Africa 24 2oC scenario 25 2oC Secunda sensitivity 26 Coal-related policy dimensions for achieving NDCs and moving to 2°C scenarios 30 Implementing NDCs 30 Moving from NDCs to 2°C compatible transitions for coal 30 Conclusions 32 References 34 COAL TRANSITION IN SOUTH AFRICA 3 Executive summary 1Executive summary South Africa is highly coal and energy intensive, and has of the coal mining workforce is unskilled, and the trend an economy characterized by extremely high levels of in- has been towards higher numbers of skilled and semi- equality and poverty (with more than half of the popula- skilled workers. This could be exacerbated as mining tion living in poverty. In the long run, sustainable growth technology develops and autonomous mining becomes and development in South Africa will depend crucially on the norm. There is already an employment crisis in min- the transition away from a coal-intensive energy system ing in general and coal mining in particular that requires and economy. This study has examined the challenges intervention from the state to manage and resource. already facing the coal sector and highlights the risks of a development strategy that continues to rely on the sector for energy security, employment, and growth. The scenarios Nonetheless, mitigating the effects of the energy and The study examines three future pathways for South coal transition on vulnerable workers and communities Africa’s coal sector that allow us to assess key risks and means understanding the challenges already facing the opportunities in South Africa’s coal transition. First, we sector, planning to make the transition one that is just examine a least-cost energy pathway that assumes no for workers and communities in coal-dependent areas, climate change mitigation policy is implemented beyond and implementing strategies for the country to diversify a gradual phase down of coal power as stations reach into new sectors and maximise employment. the end of their lives or become uncompetitive with new The difficulty of the transition is exacerbated by South generation technologies. In this scenario, South Afri- Arica’s very high dependence on coal for energy and ca meets its nationally determined contribution (NDC) coal’s role in the economy in general and Mpumalanga under the Paris Agreement in 2025 and 2030, and also in particular. At the same time, the coal sector is already achieves average annual GDP growth of 3.3%. facing challenges and crises due to cost increases, energy The largest users of coal are the electricity and liquid security risks, export demand risks, and low local demand fuels sectors, where alternative supply options and mit- growth. These are already having profound implications igation costs are also considerably lower than in end-use for South African electricity consumers. For example, sectors such as industry. As our results show, meeting Eskom’s primary energy costs have increased by 300% South Africa’s NDC is possible through decarbonising in real terms over the past 20 years. The large increases electricity and liquid fuels, but without large scale miti- in Eskom’s primary energy costs have, along with cost gation in the industrial sector. By 2050, wind and solar overruns at new coal fired plants under construction, PV provide 71% of electricity. contributed to rapidly increasing electricity prices that The trend is towards higher growth in the electricity have put Eskom, and the economy, under increasing sector, And this is also reflected in the employment num- pressure. Demand for electricity has thus stagnated over bers, where the net job effects in the electricity sector the past decade even as Eskom continues to bring new are positive, even as the number of workers employed coal-fired generating capacity online. At the same time, in coal plants decreases as stations are decommissioned new renewable capacity is now considerably cheaper on (since only Medupi and Kusile are online in 2050). a levelised cost and system basis than either new Eskom coal-fired power plants (under construction) or proposed privately owned coal plants (CSIR, 2016; Steyn, Burton, Employment in coal mining decreases & Steenkamp, 2016). by 28,200 workers by 2050, relative to 78,000 workers From an employment perspective, coal mining employ- in 2015. The impact on total coal mining employment ment peaked in 1981, and has declined as mines have is limited by the increased use of coal directly by the increasingly mechanised their operations. The sector em- industrial sector, which grows over the period. However, ploys far fewer workers than in the past, and has become overall, coal production in the NDC scenario declines by more skills-intensive over the past 20 years. Around half 1.1% per year between 2017 and 2050 in a least cost 4 COAL TRANSITION IN SOUTH AFRICA Executive summary energy pathway for South Africa. This points that there does not build new coal plants. The inclusion of either is a need for planning for South Africa’s due to the rela- new coal plants or the life extension of older plants in the tive economics of new supply options alone. Even with IRP will not only prevent South Africa from achieving the limited implementation of climate change policy, coal low range of its NDC (398 Mt CO2-eq in 2025-2030), is no longer South Africa’s future. but will potentially raise greenhouse emissions to a level Compatibility with 2oC will require large scale and rapid that exceeds the upper range of the NDC in 2025. switching away from coal in the electricity sector and South Africa will already exceed the lower end of the liquid fuels sectors, and also requires industrial fuel NDC commitment range in 2025 and 2030. The inclu- switching. Meeting the low-PPD emission budget to sion of new coal-fired power, for example the planned 2050 results in the installation of substantially more coal IPPs Thabametsi and Khanyisa, or the full new coal renewable energy in the electricity sector, where, be- capacity envisaged in the IRP 2010, would further reduce cause of its lower cost, most mitigation still takes place. the likelihood that the country could move towards the By 2040, the share of coal in the electricity sector is zero low range of its NDC (and thus it’s PPD). with both Medupi and Kusile coming offline before then. At the same time, an IRP should explore the implications Unlike the older coal plants that are surplus in the 2020s of allowing coal-fired power plants to retire because they but have been paid off, Medupi and Kusile will only be are surplus to capacity needs, no longer economic to online by 2022, and their retirement by 2040 results in run, or cannot be environmentally compliant. This is both economic and technical stranding of the stations. also necessary to understand the rate of South Africa’s Given this, calls for the last 2 units of Kusile not to be coal transition even without climate change mitigation completed make economic sense given South Africa’s policy. In previous iterations of the IRP, the plants were climate mitigation policy commitments and the need committed to run for 50 years, but as we have seen, it for least-cost mitigation planning. is already feasible from both an economic and energy By 2050, solar PV and wind make up 80.2% of electricity security perspective to retire some plants due to their generated, and gas 16% (with hydro 1.3%, and imports high costs (Steyn, Burton, Steenkamp, 2017).
Recommended publications
  • Trends in Electricity Prices During the Transition Away from Coal by William B
    May 2021 | Vol. 10 / No. 10 PRICES AND SPENDING Trends in electricity prices during the transition away from coal By William B. McClain The electric power sector of the United States has undergone several major shifts since the deregulation of wholesale electricity markets began in the 1990s. One interesting shift is the transition away from coal-powered plants toward a greater mix of natural gas and renewable sources. This transition has been spurred by three major factors: rising costs of prepared coal for use in power generation, a significant expansion of economical domestic natural gas production coupled with a corresponding decline in prices, and rapid advances in technology for renewable power generation.1 The transition from coal, which included the early retirement of coal plants, has affected major price-determining factors within the electric power sector such as operation and maintenance costs, 1 U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS capital investment, and fuel costs. Through these effects, the decline of coal as the primary fuel source in American electricity production has affected both wholesale and retail electricity prices. Identifying specific price effects from the transition away from coal is challenging; however the producer price indexes (PPIs) for electric power can be used to compare general trends in price development across generator types and regions, and can be used to learn valuable insights into the early effects of fuel switching in the electric power sector from coal to natural gas and renewable sources. The PPI program measures the average change in prices for industries based on the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS).
    [Show full text]
  • Coal Mine Methane Country Profiles, June 2015
    Disclaimer The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency does not: a) Make any warranty or representation, expressed or implied, with respect to the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of the information contained in this report, or that the use of any apparatus, method, or process disclosed in this report may not infringe upon privately owned rights; or b) Assume any liability with respect to the use of, or damages resulting from the use of, any information, apparatus, method, or process disclosed in this report. CMM Country Profiles CONTENTS Units of Conversions .............................................................................................................................................. i Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................................. ii Global Overview at a Glance ................................................................................................................................. ii Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................ 1 Purpose of the Report ............................................................................................................................................. 2 Organization of the Report ................................................................................................................................... 2 1 Argentina ......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • TRANSNET PIPELINES 2020 Transnet Pipelines 2020 1
    TRANSNET PIPELINES 2020 Transnet Pipelines 2020 1 Contents 2 Highlights 2 Business overview 3 Where we operate 3 Regulatory environment 4 Operational performance 4 Core initiatives for 2020 5 Overview of key performance indicators 6 Financial performance review 7 Performance commentary 7 Financial sustainability 7 Capacity creation and maintenance 7 Operational performance 7 Capacity utilisation 7 Service delivery 8 Sustainable developmental outcomes 9 Key risks and mitigating activities 9 Opportunities 10 Abbreviations and acronyms Transnet Pipelines 2020 2 Highlights Revenue increased by 8,9% to R5,7 billion. EBITDA decreased by 4,7% to R3,8 billion. Petroleum volumes transported decreased by 0,3% to 17,8 billion litres. Recorded a DIFR of 0,70 against a target of 0,60. The New Multi-Product Pipeline (NMPP), 24-inch trunk Business overview line is in full operation with a capacity of 148 Mℓ per Transnet Pipelines (Pipelines) is the largest multi- week. The line is capable of transporting two diesel product pipeline operator in southern Africa, grades (D10 and D50) and two unleaded petrol grades transporting liquid petroleum and methane-rich gas (93 and 95) as well as jet fuel. through a network of 3 116 kilometres of pipeline The inland accumulation facility, located in the infrastructure. The core strategic objective of strategic node of Jameson Park, Gauteng (TM2) with Pipelines is to play a key role to ensure the product a capacity of 180 Mℓ, has been operational since security of supply for the inland market. Pipelines December 2017. It facilitates security of supply to the offers integrated pipeline network supply chain inland economic hub and surrounding areas.
    [Show full text]
  • South Africa's Coalfields — a 2014 Perspective
    International Journal of Coal Geology 132 (2014) 170–254 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect International Journal of Coal Geology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ijcoalgeo South Africa's coalfields — A 2014 perspective P. John Hancox a,⁎,AnnetteE.Götzb,c a University of the Witwatersrand, School of Geosciences and Evolutionary Studies Institute, Private Bag 3, 2050 Wits, South Africa b University of Pretoria, Department of Geology, Private Bag X20, Hatfield, 0028 Pretoria, South Africa c Kazan Federal University, 18 Kremlyovskaya St., Kazan 420008, Republic of Tatarstan, Russian Federation article info abstract Article history: For well over a century and a half coal has played a vital role in South Africa's economy and currently bituminous Received 7 April 2014 coal is the primary energy source for domestic electricity generation, as well as being the feedstock for the Received in revised form 22 June 2014 production of a substantial percentage of the country's liquid fuels. It furthermore provides a considerable source Accepted 22 June 2014 of foreign revenue from exports. Available online 28 June 2014 Based on geographic considerations, and variations in the sedimentation, origin, formation, distribution and quality of the coals, 19 coalfields are generally recognised in South Africa. This paper provides an updated review Keywords: Gondwana coal of their exploration and exploitation histories, general geology, coal seam nomenclature and coal qualities. With- Permian in the various coalfields autocyclic variability is the norm rather than the exception, whereas allocyclic variability Triassic is much less so, and allows for the correlation of genetically related sequences. During the mid-Jurassic break up Coalfield of Gondwana most of the coal-bearing successions were intruded by dolerite.
    [Show full text]
  • Biomass Basics: the Facts About Bioenergy 1 We Rely on Energy Every Day
    Biomass Basics: The Facts About Bioenergy 1 We Rely on Energy Every Day Energy is essential in our daily lives. We use it to fuel our cars, grow our food, heat our homes, and run our businesses. Most of our energy comes from burning fossil fuels like petroleum, coal, and natural gas. These fuels provide the energy that we need today, but there are several reasons why we are developing sustainable alternatives. 2 We are running out of fossil fuels Fossil fuels take millions of years to form within the Earth. Once we use up our reserves of fossil fuels, we will be out in the cold - literally - unless we find other fuel sources. Bioenergy, or energy derived from biomass, is a sustainable alternative to fossil fuels because it can be produced from renewable sources, such as plants and waste, that can be continuously replenished. Fossil fuels, such as petroleum, need to be imported from other countries Some fossil fuels are found in the United States but not enough to meet all of our energy needs. In 2014, 27% of the petroleum consumed in the United States was imported from other countries, leaving the nation’s supply of oil vulnerable to global trends. When it is hard to buy enough oil, the price can increase significantly and reduce our supply of gasoline – affecting our national security. Because energy is extremely important to our economy, it is better to produce energy in the United States so that it will always be available when we need it. Use of fossil fuels can be harmful to humans and the environment When fossil fuels are burned, they release carbon dioxide and other gases into the atmosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • Producing Meerkat Images with an Unlikely Algorithm SYSTEMS
    New Chief Scientist for SKA SA Former Columbia University academic joins SKA South Africa. PAGE 15 2016NEWSLETTER FOR SOUTH AFRICA’s SQUARE KILOMETRE ARRAY PROJECTnews PRODUCING PAGE 10 MEERKAT IMAGESThe search for WITH AN UNLIKELY serendipity ALGORITHM How will we find the PAGE 10 unknown unknowns? NEWS MINISTER NALEDI PANDOR AND DEPUTY MINISTERS VISIT ARRAY RELEASE 1 PAGE 03 SYSTEMS HERA AWARDED $9.5 MILLION FUNDING PAGE 12 OUTREACH LEADING US RADIO ASTRONOMER VISITS CARNARVON HIGH SCHOOL PAGE 16 From 4 of the Major milestone Ten legacy project eventual 64 dishes towards delivering teams share MeerKAT produces first the SKA Existing and future survey remarkable test image SKA selects final dish design project teams present plans SKANEWS 2016/2017 NEWSLETTER FOR SOUTH AFRICA’S SQUARE KILOMETRE ARRAY PROJECT SKA IN AFRICA HERA Thousands of SKA antenna dishes will be built in South Africa The HERA (Hydrogen Epoch of Reionisation Array) radio telescope will (in the Karoo, not far from the Northern Cape town of Carnarvon), be instrumental in detecting the distinctive signature that would allow with outstations in other parts of South Africa, astronomers to understand the formation and evolution of the very first as well as in eight African partner countries. luminous sources: the first stars and galaxies in the Universe. C-BASS KAT-7 The C-Band All Sky Survey project (C-BASS) The seven-dish MeerKAT precursor array, KAT-7, is a project to map the sky in microwave is the world’s first radio telescope array consisting of (short-wavelength radio) radiation. composite antenna structures. KUTUNSE MeerKAT The antenna in Kutunse, Ghana, which is part of the The South African MeerKAT radio telescope is a precursor to the SKA African Very Long Baseline Interferometry Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope and will be integrated (VLBI) Network (AVN).
    [Show full text]
  • Biomass Cofiring in Coal-Fired Boilers
    DOE/EE-0288 Leading by example, saving energy and Biomass Cofiring in Coal-Fired Boilers taxpayer dollars Using this time-tested fuel-switching technique in existing federal boilers in federal facilities helps to reduce operating costs, increase the use of renewable energy, and enhance our energy security Executive Summary To help the nation use more domestic fuels and renewable energy technologies—and increase our energy security—the Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) in the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, assists government agencies in developing biomass energy projects. As part of that assistance, FEMP has prepared this Federal Technology Alert on biomass cofiring technologies. This publication was prepared to help federal energy and facility managers make informed decisions about using biomass cofiring in existing coal-fired boilers at their facilities. The term “biomass” refers to materials derived from plant matter such as trees, grasses, and agricultural crops. These materials, grown using energy from sunlight, can be renewable energy sources for fueling many of today’s energy needs. The most common types of biomass that are available at potentially attractive prices for energy use at federal facilities are waste wood and wastepaper. The boiler plant at the Department of Energy’s One of the most attractive and easily implemented biomass energy technologies is cofiring Savannah River Site co- fires coal and biomass. with coal in existing coal-fired boilers. In biomass cofiring, biomass can substitute for up to 20% of the coal used in the boiler. The biomass and coal are combusted simultaneously. When it is used as a supplemental fuel in an existing coal boiler, biomass can provide the following benefits: lower fuel costs, avoidance of landfills and their associated costs, and reductions in sulfur oxide, nitrogen oxide, and greenhouse-gas emissions.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecotaxes: a Comparative Study of India and China
    Ecotaxes: A Comparative Study of India and China Rajat Verma ISBN 978-81-7791-209-8 © 2016, Copyright Reserved The Institute for Social and Economic Change, Bangalore Institute for Social and Economic Change (ISEC) is engaged in interdisciplinary research in analytical and applied areas of the social sciences, encompassing diverse aspects of development. ISEC works with central, state and local governments as well as international agencies by undertaking systematic studies of resource potential, identifying factors influencing growth and examining measures for reducing poverty. The thrust areas of research include state and local economic policies, issues relating to sociological and demographic transition, environmental issues and fiscal, administrative and political decentralization and governance. It pursues fruitful contacts with other institutions and scholars devoted to social science research through collaborative research programmes, seminars, etc. The Working Paper Series provides an opportunity for ISEC faculty, visiting fellows and PhD scholars to discuss their ideas and research work before publication and to get feedback from their peer group. Papers selected for publication in the series present empirical analyses and generally deal with wider issues of public policy at a sectoral, regional or national level. These working papers undergo review but typically do not present final research results, and constitute works in progress. ECOTAXES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF INDIA AND CHINA1 Rajat Verma2 Abstract This paper attempts to compare various forms of ecotaxes adopted by India and China in order to reduce their carbon emissions by 2020 and to address other environmental issues. The study contributes to the literature by giving a comprehensive definition of ecotaxes and using it to analyse the status of these taxes in India and China.
    [Show full text]
  • Phase-Out 2020: Monitoring Europe's Fossil Fuel Subsidies
    Phase-out 2020 Monitoring Europe’s fossil fuel subsidies Ipek Gençsü, Maeve McLynn, Matthias Runkel, Markus Trilling, Laurie van der Burg, Leah Worrall, Shelagh Whitley, and Florian Zerzawy September 2017 Report partners ODI is the UK’s leading independent think tank on international development and humanitarian issues. Climate Action Network (CAN) Europe is Europe’s largest coalition working on climate and energy issues. Readers are encouraged to reproduce material for their own publications, as long as they are not being sold commercially. As copyright holders, ODI and Overseas Development Institute CAN Europe request due acknowledgement and a copy of the publication. For 203 Blackfriars Road CAN Europe online use, we ask readers to link to the original resource on the ODI website. London SE1 8NJ Rue d’Edimbourg 26 The views presented in this paper are those of the author(s) and do not Tel +44 (0)20 7922 0300 1050 Brussels, Belgium necessarily represent the views of ODI or our partners. Fax +44 (0)20 7922 0399 Tel: +32 (0) 28944670 www.odi.org www.caneurope.org © Overseas Development Institute and CAN Europe 2017. This work is licensed [email protected] [email protected] under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial Licence (CC BY-NC 4.0). Cover photo: Oil refinery in Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany – Ralf Vetterle (CC0 creative commons license). 2 Report Acknowledgements The authors are grateful for support and advice on the report from: Dave Jones of Sandbag UK, Colin Roche of Friends of the Earth Europe, Andrew Scott and Sejal Patel of the Overseas Development Institute, Helena Wright of E3G, and Andrew Murphy of Transport & Environment, and Alex Doukas of Oil Change International.
    [Show full text]
  • Coal Characteristics
    CCTR Indiana Center for Coal Technology Research COAL CHARACTERISTICS CCTR Basic Facts File # 8 Brian H. Bowen, Marty W. Irwin The Energy Center at Discovery Park Purdue University CCTR, Potter Center, 500 Central Drive West Lafayette, IN 47907-2022 http://www.purdue.edu/dp/energy/CCTR/ Email: [email protected] October 2008 1 Indiana Center for Coal Technology Research CCTR COAL FORMATION As geological processes apply pressure to peat over time, it is transformed successively into different types of coal Source: Kentucky Geological Survey http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.uky.edu/KGS/coal/images/peatcoal.gif&imgrefurl=http://www.uky.edu/KGS/coal/coalform.htm&h=354&w=579&sz= 20&hl=en&start=5&um=1&tbnid=NavOy9_5HD07pM:&tbnh=82&tbnw=134&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dcoal%2Bphotos%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DX 2 Indiana Center for Coal Technology Research CCTR COAL ANALYSIS Elemental analysis of coal gives empirical formulas such as: C137H97O9NS for Bituminous Coal C240H90O4NS for high-grade Anthracite Coal is divided into 4 ranks: (1) Anthracite (2) Bituminous (3) Sub-bituminous (4) Lignite Source: http://cc.msnscache.com/cache.aspx?q=4929705428518&lang=en-US&mkt=en-US&FORM=CVRE8 3 Indiana Center for Coal Technology Research CCTR BITUMINOUS COAL Bituminous Coal: Great pressure results in the creation of bituminous, or “soft” coal. This is the type most commonly used for electric power generation in the U.S. It has a higher heating value than either lignite or sub-bituminous, but less than that of anthracite. Bituminous coal
    [Show full text]
  • Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report: Volume 2
    VOLUME TWO Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report The report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission was presented to President Nelson Mandela on 29 October 1998. Archbishop Desmond Tutu Ms Hlengiwe Mkhize Chairperson Dr Alex Boraine Mr Dumisa Ntsebeza Vice-Chairperson Ms Mary Burton Dr Wendy Orr Revd Bongani Finca Adv Denzil Potgieter Ms Sisi Khampepe Dr Fazel Randera Mr Richard Lyster Ms Yasmin Sooka Mr Wynand Malan* Ms Glenda Wildschut Dr Khoza Mgojo * Subject to minority position. See volume 5. Chief Executive Officer: Dr Biki Minyuku I CONTENTS Chapter 1 Chapter 6 National Overview .......................................... 1 Special Investigation The Death of President Samora Machel ................................................ 488 Chapter 2 The State outside Special Investigation South Africa (1960-1990).......................... 42 Helderberg Crash ........................................... 497 Special Investigation Chemical and Biological Warfare........ 504 Chapter 3 The State inside South Africa (1960-1990).......................... 165 Special Investigation Appendix: State Security Forces: Directory Secret State Funding................................... 518 of Organisations and Structures........................ 313 Special Investigation Exhumations....................................................... 537 Chapter 4 The Liberation Movements from 1960 to 1990 ..................................................... 325 Special Investigation Appendix: Organisational structures and The Mandela United
    [Show full text]
  • Sasol Beyond South Africa
    Sasol beyond South Africa Who is Sasol? Sasol was founded in 1950 as Suid-Afrikaanse Steenkool en Olie (South African Coal and Oil) and was the world’s first coal-to-liquids refinery, now supplying 40% of South Africa’s fuel. The company has technology for the conversion of low-grade coal into synthetic fuels and chemicals. The company is also involved in many other industries, such as olefins and surfactants, polymers, solvents, ammonia, wax and nitrogen (used in fertiliser and explosives), among others. Protestors at the Global Day of Action during the UN’s 17th Conference of the Parties. Photo: groundWork Global activities Sasol is a global company listed on the New York and Johannesburg stock exchanges and has exploration, development, production, marketing and sales operations in thirty-eight countries across the world, including Southern Africa, the rest of Africa, the Americas, the United Kingdom, Europe, the Middle East, Northern Asia, Southeast Asia, the Far East and Australasia. Sasol Petroleum International (SPI) is responsible for Sasol’s oil and gas exploration in countries beyond South Africa, including Gabon, Nigeria, Papua Niue Guinea and Australia, while Sasol Synfuels International (SSI) develops gas-to-liquids (GTL) plants in places such as Latin America, Australasia, Asia-Pacific and the Middle East. 1 Africa Mozambique Mozambique’s current electricity generating capacity is around 2 200 MW, most of it from the Cahora Bassa hydroelectric dam. Most of that power is exported to neighbouring South Africa despite only about 18% of Mozambicans having access to electricity. A $2.1 billion joint venture project between Sasol and Mozambique’s Empresa Nacional Pipelines carrying gas from Mozambique to South Africa de Hidrocarbonetas (ENH) aims http://www.un.org/africarenewal/magazine/october-2007/pipeline-benefits- to develop a gas resource that mozambique-south-africa has been ‘stranded’ for many years since its discovery in the 1960.
    [Show full text]