Standard Operating Procedure for UCO Mammal Collection

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Standard Operating Procedure for UCO Mammal Collection 1 UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM (UCONHM) MAMMAL SPECIMEN PRESERVATION & PREPARATION POLICIES & GUIDELINES Revised Jan 2010 William Caire & Lynda Loucks 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………………………………..5 A. Purpose of Manual …………………………………………………………………………..5 B. Official Acronym of the UCONHM Mammal Collection …………………………………5 II. SCOPE AND TYPES OF SPECIMENS IN THE MAMMAL SECTION…………………………5 A. Teaching Collection …………………………………………………………………………..6 B. Research Collection …………………………………………………………………………...6 III. PERSONNEL OF THE MAMMAL SECTION OF THE UCONHM ……………………………6 A. Curators ……………………………………………………………………………………….6 B. Collection Manager…………………………………………………………………………....6 C. Nonprofessional Staff…………………………………………………………………………6 IV. CODE OF ETHICS OF THE MAMMAL SECTION OF THE UCONHM ……………………...6 A. Ethical Guidelines …………………………………………………………………………….6 V. ACCESS TO THE MAMMAL SECTION OF THE UCONHM…………………………………..7 A. Request to Visit the UCONHM Mammal Collection ……………………………………….7 B. Denial of Access………………………………………………………………………………..7 C. Tours…………………………………………………………………………………………...7 D. Use of Mammal Teaching Materials…………………………………………………………7 VI. GUIDELINES FOR USE OF THE COLLECTION AT UCO…………………………………….7 VII. ORGANIZATION OF COLLECTION…………………………………………………………….8 A. Arrangement of Cases ………………………………………………………………………..8 B. Arrangement of Specimens in Drawers ……………………………………………………..8 C. Arrangement of Fluid Specimens …………………………………………………………...8 VIII. DEPOSITION AND ACCESSIONING OF MAMMAL SPECIMENS AND ASSOCIATED MATERIALS INTO THE UCONHM MAMMAL COLLECTION…………………………………..8 A. Delivery of Materials to the UCONHM Mammal Museum ………………………………..8 B. Criteria for Material to Be Cataloged/accessioned Into the UCONHM Mammal Collection ………………………………………………………………………………………8 C. Ownership of Mammal Specimens and Associated Materials …………………………….9 D. Cataloging/Accessioning of Mammalian Material into the UCONHM …………………..9 1. Official Catalogue ……………………………………………………………………9 2. Assigning Specimen Numbers ……………………………………………………...9 3. Entering Specimen Data into the Catalog…………………………………………..9 4. Original Field Notes and Data Associated With Mammal Specimens …………..10 IX. DISPOSAL/DEACCESSIONING OF MAMMAL SPECIMENS AND ASSOCIATED MATERIALS …………………………………………………….……………………………………...10 A. Reasons for Disposal or Deaccessioning Mammal Materials …………………………….10 B. Acceptable Processes for Disposal/deaccessioning of Specimens and Associated Materials…………………………………………………………………………………………11 1. Trades or Exchanges…………………………………………………………………11 2. Transfers……………………………………………………………………………...11 3. Institutional Sharing…………………………………………………………………11 4. Discarding Mammal Specimens and Associated Materials……………………….11 5. Sales…………………………………………………………………………………...11 C. Record Keeping………………………………………………………………………………11 D Catalog Numbers of Deaccessioned Specimens……………………………………………..11 X. APPRASIAL OF MAMMAL DONATIONS ……………………………………………………...12 XI. LOANS……………………………………………………………………………………………….12 A. Loan Conditions……………………………………………………………………………...12 B. Borrowing Mammal Specimens and Associated Materials ……………………………….13 3 C. Incoming Loans to the Mammal Section …………………………………………………..13 D. Mammal Tissue Loans – Including Invasive or Destructive Sampling…………………..13 1. Guidelines Governing Invasive or Destructive Sampling ………………………..14 2. Written Request for Invasive or Destructive Sampling …………………………..14 3. Additional Requirements of Tissue Sample Loans………………………………..15 E. Casting of Mammal Specimens or Associated Materials………………………………….15 F. Loan of Documents in the Mammal Section of the UCONHM…………………………...15 1. Guidelines Governing the Loan of Documents ……………………………………15 2. Written Request for Loan of Documents ………………………………………….15 G. Packaging of Loan Specimens to be Mailed ……………………………………………….16 1. Mammal Specimen Skins……………………………………………………………16 2. Skull and Skeletal Specimens ………………………………………………………16 3. Fluid Preserved Specimens………………………………………………………….17 4. Tissue Samples……………………………………………………………………….17 H. Documentation of loans……………………………………………………………………...17 I. Curation of Loan Material Returning to the UCONHM………………………………….18 XII. COMPUTER DATABASE OF THE MAMMAL SECTION OF THE UCONHM …………...18 XIII. INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT AND PREVENTATIVE CONSERVATION OF MAMMAL SPECIMENS IN THE UCONHM………………………………………………..19 A. Pest management in the mammal section of the UCONHM………………………………19 XIV. EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT OF THE MAMMAL SECTION OF THE UCONHM…...20 XV. HEALTH AND SAFETY CONCERNS IN MAMMAL SECTION OF THE UCONHM …….20 A. Authority and Responsibilities………………………………………………………………20 B. Safety Inspections of the Mammal Section of the UCONHM……………………………..20 C. Hazard Elimination or Control in the Mammal Museum Areas………….……………...21 D. Safety Training……………………………………………………………………………….21 E. Hazardous Waste Disposal in the Mammal Section of the UCONHM…………………...21 1. Authority and Responsibilities……………………………………………………...21 2. Storage of Hazardous Materials…………………………………………………….21 3. Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS)……………………………………………….21 4. Chemical Inventory List…………………………………………………………….22 5. Container Labeling…………………………………………………………………..22 6. Training………………………………………………………………………………22 7. Disposal of Hazardous Chemicals…………………………………………………..22 F. Disposal of Biohazardous Wastes……………………………………………………………22 XVI. GUIDELINES FOR THE PREPARATION OF MAMMAL SPECIEMENS FOR THE UCONHM………………………………………………………………………………………..22 A. Permits ……………………………………………………………………………………….22 B. Approved Methods of Collecting and Euthanizing mammals…………………………….22 C. Unprepared Mammal Material……………………………………………………………..22 D. Storing Mammal Specimens in the Field…………………………………………………...23 E. Data to be Recording in the Field with Each Specimen…………………………………...23 1. Field Data ……………………………………………………………………………23 a. Collector’s Catalog………………………………………………………….23 b. Collector’s Journal………………………………………………………….24 c. Collector’s Species Accounts……………………………………………….24 2 Data to be Recorded from and Preserved with Each Specimen ………………….24 a. How to Record External Measurements and Weight…………………….24 3. Specimen Tags for Dry, Fluid and Skeletal Specimens……………………………25 a. Skin Tag ……………………………………………………………………..25 b. Skull Tag for Any Skull Separated from the Skin ……………………….25 4 c. Skelton Tags …………………………………………………………………25 F. Voucher Specimens ………………………………………………………………………….25 1. Plaster Cast of Tracks……………………………………………………………….26 2. Photographs …………………………………………………………………..……..26 3. Wet or Fluid Specimens …………………………………………………………….26 a. Museum Fluid Preparation Method ………………………………………26 b. Field Containers for Fluid Storage of Mammal Specimens ……………..27 c. Cataloging and Storing Fluid Mammal Specimens……………………….28 4. Hair Samples ………………………………………………………………………...28 a. Hair Collecting from an Individual Mammal …………………………….28 b. Hair Taken at Collection (Snare or Rub) Stations ……………………….29 5. Tissue Samples……………………………………………………………………….29 a. TK Data Sheet ……………………………………………………………..29 b. Information Entered on TK Sheet………………………………………...30 c. How to Fill and Label Cryotubes …………………………………………31 d. How to Preserve Tissue Samples in Ethanol for DNA Analysis………….32 6. Traditional Museum Skin and Skull Specimens…………………………………...33 a. Preparing a Traditional Mammal Study Skin…………………………….33 7. Mammal Skeletal Material ………………………………………………………….40 a. Skull Extraction From/Before Making a Fluid Specimen ……………….40 b. Manual Cleaning of Skulls After Extraction From a Fluid Preserved Specimen……………………………………………………………….41 c. Cleaning Skull and Skeletal Material With Dermestid Beetles…………..41 (1) Drying & Preparation Mammal Skulls & Skeletons for Dermestid Cleaning…………………………………………..41 (a) Small Mammals (Bats, Mice, Squirrels)………………...42 (b) Medium/Large Mammals (Rabbits, Coyotes, Deer)……42 (2) After Drying the Specimen………………………………………..42 (a) Skulls………………………………………………………42 (b) Small Full Skeleton (e.g. Shrews, Bats, Mice)…………..42 ● 1st Method………………………………………….42 ● 2nd Method …………………………………………42 (c) Large Full Skeleton (badgers, deer)……………………..43 (3) Into the Dermestid Colony ……………………………………….43 (4) After Removal from the Beetle Colony ………………………….43 (5) Mammal Skull & Skeleton Labeling and Storage………………43 8. Preparing a Baculum ……………………………………………………………….43 a. Equipment for Baculum Preparation and Storage……………………….44 b. Steps in Baculum Preparation and Storage……………………………….44 XVII. EXPENSES ASSOCIATED WITH CURATING THE MAMMAL SECTION OF THE UCONHM……………………………………………………………………………………….44 XVIII. SUPPLIERS OF MAMMAL CURATORIAL EQUIPMENT IN THE UNITED STATES………………………………………………………………………………………….45 XIX. LITERATURE CITED …………………………………………………………………………...46 XX: COPIES OF FORMS………………………………………………………………………………47 A. Mammal Loan Form …………………………………………………………………47 B. Mammal TK Form ………………………………………………………………...48 5 I. INTRODUCTION Much of what is contained below in the University of Central Oklahoma Natural History Museum (UCONHM) Standard Operating Procedures and Specimen Preparation Guidelines have been paraphrased from several other excellent Collection Management Policy Manuals. One of these is the Manual of the Museum of Southwestern Biology, Division of Mammals located at the University of New Mexico in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Those involved with the preparation of the MSB guidelines were Joseph A. Cook, Curator of Mammals, Michael A. Bogan, USGS Curator Emeritus, Jonathan L. Dunnum, Senior Collection Manager (MSB) and Cindy A. Ramotnik, Senior Collection Manager (USGS). Their manual is at http://www.msb.unm.edu/mammals/PolicyDOM.pdf. Another good source used was the animal sections of the Standards for Components of British Columbia's Biodiversity No.
Recommended publications
  • Morphological Variability of the Baculum in Martes Foina (Carnivora: Mustelidae) from Turkey
    Turkish Journal of Zoology Turk J Zool (2018) 42: 666-672 http://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/zoology/ © TÜBİTAK Research Article doi:10.3906/zoo-1802-39 Morphological variability of the baculum in Martes foina (Carnivora: Mustelidae) from Turkey Ahmet Haris Selçuk ÖZEN* Department of Biology, Faculty of Science and Literature, Dumlupınar University, Evliya Çelebi Campus, Kütahya, Turkey Received: 25.02.2018 Accepted/Published Online: 10.09.2018 Final Version: 12.11.2018 Abstract: The present study was based on the bacula of 39 male (17 juvenile, 22 adult) stone marten (Martes foina) samples obtained from all geographical regions of Turkey between 1995 and 2016. Morphological variability in 11 characteristics of bacula was investigated. The purpose of this study was to measure numerical characters of the baculum, to identify relationships between measurements, and to evaluate variabilities in its morphology. Weight, total length, base length, base height, base width, apex height, apex width, median width, and median height were significantly greater in the bacula of adults compared to the bacula of juveniles. The most variable characteristic in adults was base width (18.96%). There was a significant relationship between some characteristics of the bacula measured. The strongest positive relationships were observed between median height and baculum weight (r = 0.771), weight and base length (r = 0.755), and median width and weight (r = 0.750) characteristics. Statistical analysis (PCA) also revealed a strong relationship between some characteristics. In particular, positive correlations between width and height sizes in the base (proximal), median, and distal of the baculum, as well as axis–apex height and apex width, suggest relationships that protect the urethra and baculum from fissures and fractures during copulation.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Socio-Sexual Behaviour of the Extinct Ursid Indarctos Arctoides: an Approach Based on Its Baculum Size and Morphology
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Digital.CSIC On the Socio-Sexual Behaviour of the Extinct Ursid Indarctos arctoides: An Approach Based on Its Baculum Size and Morphology Juan Abella1,2*, Alberto Valenciano3,4, Alejandro Pe´rez-Ramos5, Plinio Montoya6, Jorge Morales2 1 Institut Catala` de Paleontologia Miquel Crusafont, Universitat Auto`noma de Barcelona. Edifici ICP, Campus de la UAB s/n, Barcelona, Spain, 2 Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales-CSIC, Madrid, Spain, 3 Departamento de Geologı´a Sedimentaria y Cambio Medioambiental. Instituto de Geociencias (CSIC, UCM), Madrid, Spain, 4 Departamento de Paleontologı´a, Facultad de Ciencias Geolo´gicas UCM, Madrid, Spain, 5 Institut Cavanilles de Biodiversitat i Biologia Evolutiva, Universitat de Vale`ncia, Paterna, Spain, 6 Departament de Geologia, A` rea de Paleontologia, Universitat de Vale`ncia, Burjassot, Spain Abstract The fossil bacula, or os penis, constitutes a rare subject of study due to its scarcity in the fossil record. In the present paper we describe five bacula attributed to the bear Indarctos arctoides Depe´ret, 1895 from the Batallones-3 site (Madrid Basin, Spain). Both the length and morphology of this fossil bacula enabled us to make interpretative approaches to a series of ecological and ethological characters of this bear. Thus, we suggest that I. arctoides could have had prolonged periods of intromission and/or maintenance of intromission during the post-ejaculatory intervals, a multi-male mating system and large home range sizes and/or lower population density. Its size might also have helped females to choose from among the available males.
    [Show full text]
  • Studying the Effects of Predatory Presence and Enrichment on Cryptoprocta Ferox Behavior
    The Pegasus Review: UCF Undergraduate Research Journal (URJ) Volume 11 Issue 2 Article 1 2020 Studying the Effects of Predatory Presence and Enrichment on Cryptoprocta ferox Behavior Julie Sharpe University of Central Florida Part of the Zoology Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/urj University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Office of Undergraduate Research at STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Pegasus Review: UCF Undergraduate Research Journal (URJ) by an authorized editor of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Recommended Citation Sharpe, Julie (2020) "Studying the Effects of Predatory Presence and Enrichment on Cryptoprocta ferox Behavior," The Pegasus Review: UCF Undergraduate Research Journal (URJ): Vol. 11 : Iss. 2 , Article 1. Available at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/urj/vol11/iss2/1 Sharpe: Studying the Effects of Predatory Presence & Enrichment on Cryptoprocta ferox Behavior Published Vol. 11.2: 1-6 September 23, THE PEGASUS REVIEW: 2019 UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH JOURNAL Studying the Effects of Predatory Presence and Enrichment on Cryptoprocta ferox Behavior By: Julie Sharpe Faculty Mentor: Frank Logiudice UCF Department of Biology ABSTRACT: The Central Florida Zoo and Botanical Gardens houses two fossa (Cryptoprocta ferox), a male and a female. C. ferox is an endangered species of Malagasy mongoose from the island of Madagascar. In October of 2018, an amur leopard (Panthera pardus orientalis) was moved across from the male and female C. ferox. This study was used to identify if the presence of P.
    [Show full text]
  • The Baculum Was Gained and Lost Multiple Times During Mammalian Evolution Nicholas G
    Integrative and Comparative Biology Integrative and Comparative Biology, volume 56, number 4, pp. 644–656 doi:10.1093/icb/icw034 Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology SYMPOSIUM The Baculum was Gained and Lost Multiple Times during Mammalian Evolution Nicholas G. Schultz,* Michael Lough-Stevens,* Eric Abreu,† Teri Orr‡ and Matthew D. Dean1,* *Molecular and Computational Biology, University of Southern California, 1050 Childs Way, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA; †West Adams Preparatory High School, 1500 W Washington Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90007, USA; ‡Department of Biology, University of Utah, 257 South 1400 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0840, USA From the symposium ‘‘The Morphological Diversity of Intromittent Organs’’ presented at the annual meeting of the Downloaded from Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology, January 3–7, 2016 at Portland, Oregon. 1E-mail: [email protected] http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/ Synopsis The rapid evolution of male genitalia is a nearly ubiquitous pattern across sexually reproducing organisms, likely driven by the evolutionary pressures of male–male competition, male–female interactions, and perhaps pleiotropic effects of selection. The penis of many mammalian species contains a baculum, a bone that displays astonishing mor- phological diversity. The evolution of baculum size and shape does not consistently correlate with any aspects of mating system, hindering our understanding of the evolutionary processes affecting it. One potential explanation for the lack of consistent comparative results is that the baculum is not actually a homologous structure. If the baculum of different groups evolved independently, then the assumption of homology inherent in comparative studies is violated. Here, we specifically test this hypothesis by modeling the presence/absence of bacula of 954 mammalian species across a well- at University of Idaho on October 26, 2016 established phylogeny and show that the baculum evolved a minimum of nine times, and was lost a minimum of ten times.
    [Show full text]
  • SKELETAL BIOMECHANICS of the FLORIDA MANATEE (Trichechus Manatus Latirostris) by KARI BETH CLIFTON a DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO
    SKELETAL BIOMECHANICS OF THE FLORIDA MANATEE (Trichechus manatus latirostris) By KARI BETH CLIFTON A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2005 Copyright 2005 by Kari Beth Clifton to all those—people and animal alike—who have loved, supported, encouraged, instructed, amazed, inspired, and empowered me ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This project was an enormous undertaking–one that I could not have completed alone. First I would like to acknowledge my supervisory committee chair (Roger Reep) and co-chair (Jack Mecholsky). I thank Roger for his unqualified generosity, encouragement, and guidance; and for feeding the spirit with food and wine. I benefited greatly from being allowed to wander off the path in pursuit of new ideas. I thank Jack for his patience in teaching a biologist to think like an engineer, and for the tailgates. My supervisory committee members (MaryBeth Horodyski, Donna Wheeler, and Tom Wronski) provided guidance, instruction, and support for which I am grateful. Many individuals contributed to the success of this project. While I was working at the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Dr. Sentiel Rommel suggested I take a look at manatee bone. He and Dr. Tom Koob at the Shriners Hospital for Children introduced me to the field of bone mechanics. The Save the Manatee Club funded a pilot study that led to the inception of this project. I am indebted to Maggie Stoll for her invaluable technical expertise and administrative support. To my fellow graduate students in the fracture mechanics group, I am grateful for the weekly discussions of ceramics and other things.
    [Show full text]
  • Description of Pathological Conditions in the Skeleton of an Adult Male Brown Bear Ursus Arctos from the Cantabrian Range Of
    Cadernos Lab. Xeolóxico de Laxe ISSN: 0213-4497 Coruña. 2001. Vol. 26, pp. 564-477 Description of pathological conditions in the skeleton of an adult male brown bear Ursus arctos from the Cantabrian range of mountains (Reserva Nacional de Caza de Riaño, León) Patologías óseas en un esqueleto de Oso pardo macho adulto de la Cordillera Cantábrica (Reserva Nacional de Caza de Riaño, León) PINTO, A. C.1 & ETXEBARRÍA, F.2 AB S T R A C T In this paper we describe with detail the pathological conditions found on the skeleton of an adult male brown bear from the Cantabrian Mountains. This specimen shows a great number of pathologies, some of infectious origin and others of traumatic origin, as well as pathologies such as caries. We discuss the possible aetiology of the lesions, deve- lopment and consequences, as well as how they did affect the living animal and its sur- vival opportunities. (1) Palaeontology Department, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Rd. London SW7 5BD, UNITED KINGDOM (2) Antropología, Sociedad de Ciencias Aranzadi, Alto de Zorroaga s/nº Donostia. SPAIN 466 PINTO & ETXEBARRÍA CAD. LAB. XEOL. LAXE 26 (2001) INTRODUCTION (León). It has a very great number of rele- vant pathological conditions, some of Bears are generally big-sized animals traumatic origin, some of infectious ori- and have few natural enemies. A wound gin, throughout the skeleton, chiefly bear therefore has good chances of recove- affecting the functioning of the vertebral ring from trauma or disease without being spine, pelvis and limb elements as descri- meanwhile attacked. The lack of natural bed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genetic Basis of Baculum Size and Shape Variation in Mice
    INVESTIGATION The Genetic Basis of Baculum Size and Shape Variation in Mice Nicholas G. Schultz,* Jesse Ingels,† Andrew Hillhouse,‡ Keegan Wardwell,§ Peter L. Chang,* James M. Cheverud,** Cathleen Lutz,§ Lu Lu,† Robert W. Williams,† and Matthew D. Dean*,1 *Molecular and Computational Biology, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089, †University of Tennessee, Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee 38163, ‡Texas A & M, § Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, College Station, Texas 77845, The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine 04609, and **Loyola University, Department of Biology, Chicago, Illinois 60626 ABSTRACT The rapid divergence of male genitalia is a preeminent evolutionary pattern. This rapid KEYWORDS divergence is especially striking in the baculum, a bone that occurs in the penis of many mammalian baculum species. Closely related species often display diverse baculum morphology where no other morphological sexual selection differences can be discerned. While this fundamental pattern of evolution has been appreciated at the level shape of gross morphology, nearly nothing is known about the genetic basis of size and shape divergence. size Quantifying the genetic basis of baculum size and shape variation has been difficult because these structures generally lack obvious landmarks, so comparing them in three dimensions is not straightforward. Here, we develop a novel morphometric approach to quantify size and shape variation from three- dimensional micro-CT scans taken from 369 bacula, representing 75 distinct strains of the BXD family of mice. We identify two quantitative trait loci (QTL) that explain 50% of the variance in baculum size, and a third QTL that explains more than 20% of the variance in shape.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphometrical Characterisation of a Raccoon (Procyon Lotor
    MorphometricalBeiträge characterisation zur Jagd- und of Wildforschung, a raccoon population Bd. 36 from (2011) Müritz 605–617 National Park ... 605 Beiträge zur forschung · 36 ORLANDO SCHWERY, Zürich; BERIT A. KÖHNEMANN, FRANK-UWE MICHLER, Tharandt; WINAND BRINKMANN, Zürich Morphometrical characterisation of a raccoon (Procyon lotor L.) population from Müritz National Park (Germany) by means of the Os baculum Schlagworte/key words: Waschbär, raccoon, Procyon lotor, Penisknochen, penis bone, Baculum, Os baculum, Altersschätzung, age estimation, Morphometrie, morphometrics, Müritz-Nationalpark Introduction of the Os baculum (penis bone, baculum, Os pe- nis or Os priapi). All those methods have dif- One of the most important issues in wildlife bi- ferent degrees of accuracy and cover different ology is to fi nd ways to assess a population’s ranges and groups of ages that can be distin- demographic composition (SANDERSON 1950; guished. A number of them have been compared KRAMER et al. 1999). Only if age profi le, sex for mammals in general by MORRIS (1972) and ratio and numbers of sexually mature individu- for raccoons by FIERO et VERTS (1986) and by als can be estimated, it is possible to accurately GRAU et al. (1970). predict the population’s dynamics over time, Characteristics of the Os baculum have previ- including its responses to changes in its envi- ously been under investigation for several spe- ronment or infl uences due to human activities. cies and in a diverse range of contexts, including Finally, these insights will be crucial in order development (WRIGHT 1950 in the Long-tailed to determine the most appropriate management Weasel; MURAKAMI et MIZUNO 1986 in rats), strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • FOSSA CARNIVORA Family: Eupleridae Genus: Cryptoprocta Species: Ferox
    FOSSA CARNIVORA Family: Eupleridae Genus: Cryptoprocta Species: ferox Range: endemic to Madagascar Habitat: prefers pristine undisturbed forests; it prefers humid over dry forests Niche: cathemeral, terrestrial & arboreal, carnivorous Wild diet: over 50% of diet is lemurs, also tenrecs, rodents, lizards and birds Zoo diet: Life Span: (Wild) 15 years (Captivity) 20+ yrs Sexual dimorphism: males larger than females Location in SF Zoo: APPEARANCE & PHYSICAL ADAPTATIONS: The fossa is the largest carnivorous mammal of Madagascar; it is endemic to the island of Madagascar. They have slender bodies, muscular limbs, and short, reddish-brown coats. They have small, cat-like heads, short, dog-like muzzles, and large, rounded ears. They are agile climbers with semi-retractable claws and flexible ankles that allow them to climb up and down trees head-first, and also support jumping from tree to tree. The fossa has a plantigrade gait among the trees, which gives it extra balance and stability when leaping. The fossa's tail makes up about half of the animal's length and provides balance while hunting and maneuvering amongst the trees. Weight: M 14 – 19 lbs F 12 – 15 lbs The male fossa has external genitalia with an unusually long penis HRL: 23 – 30 in and baculum (penis bone) with a spiny shaft. Unique to fossa, the female TL: 22 – 28 in undergoes a strange developmental stage during adolescence (about 1-2 years) known as transient masculinization. She develops an enlarged, spiky clitoris that resembles the male’s penis, and secretes an orange substance on her underbelly, which is otherwise seen only in mature males.
    [Show full text]
  • Allometry and Variation in the Baculum (Os Penis) of the Harp Seal, Pagophilus Groenlandicus (Carnivora: Phocidae)
    Biological Journal of the Linnean Society (2001), 72: 345–355. With 2 figures doi:10.1006/bijl.2000.0509, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on It’s all relative: allometry and variation in the baculum (os penis) of the harp seal, Pagophilus groenlandicus (Carnivora: Phocidae) EDWARD H. MILLER∗ and LAUREN E. BURTON Department of Biology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s NF A1B 3X9, Canada Received 3 March 2000; accepted for publication 3 November 2000 We compared allometry and variation in the baculum (os penis), mandible, and humerus of the harp seal, Pagophilus groenlandicus. This species is presumed to have a promiscuous mating system in which choice of mate by females during intromission with different males is likely. The baculum is large and grows throughout life so may be an honest indicator of males’ quality (size) or viability (age). We predicted that bacular size would exhibit stronger allometry relative to body size than mandibles or humeri. The baculum is less functionally (mechanically) constrained than mandibles or humeri so we also predicted it would be more variable, though less variable than sexually selected traits which do not function as honest indicators. Our sample (N=67 seals) represented broad ranges of size and age (0–35 yr) so we compared variation using residuals from allometric regressions of skeletal measurements on body length. Bacular size was isometric to body length until >137 cm (when some seals enter puberty) in body length then was highly positively allometric; mandibular and humeral size were negatively allometric to body length throughout growth. Bacula were more variable than mandibles or humeri.
    [Show full text]
  • Sperm Competition Risk and Male Genital Anatomy: Comparative Evidence for Reduced Duration of Female Sexual Receptivity in Primates with Penile Spines
    Evolutionary Ecology 16: 123–137, 2002. Ó 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. Research article Sperm competition risk and male genital anatomy: comparative evidence for reduced duration of female sexual receptivity in primates with penile spines P. STOCKLEY Animal Behaviour Group, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Liverpool, Leahurst, Chester High Road, Neston, South Wirral, CH64 7TE, UK (tel.:+44-151-7946107; fax: +44-151-7946009; e-mail: [email protected]) Received 27 March 2001; accepted 18 February2002 Co-ordinating editor: P. Harvey Abstract. Selection pressures influencing the wayin which males stimulate females during copu- lation are not well understood. In mammals, copulatorystimulation can influence female remating behaviour, both via neuroendocrine mechanisms mediating control of sexual behaviour, and po- tentiallyalso via effects of minor injuryto the female genital tract. Male adaptations to increase copulatorystimulation maytherefore function to reduce sperm competition risk byreducing the probabilitythat females will remate. This hypothesis was tested using data for primates to explore relationships between male penile anatomyand the duration of female sexual receptivity.It was predicted that penile spines or relativelylarge bacula might function to increase copulatorystim- ulation and hence to reduce the duration of female sexual receptivity. Results of the comparative analyses presented show that, after control for phylogenetic effects, relatively high penile spinosity of male primates is associated with a relativelyshort duration of female sexual receptivitywithin the ovarian cycle, although no evidence was found for a similar relationship between baculum length and duration of female sexual receptivity. The findings presented suggest a new potential function for mammalian penile spines in the context of sexual selection, and add to growing evidence that sperm competition and associated sexual conflict are important selection pressures in the evolution of animal genitalia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Animal Bones from Battlesbury Bowl
    The Animal Bones from Battlesbury Bowl Ellen Hambleton and Mark Maltby School of Conservation Sciences, Bournemouth University Introduction: Methods of Recording and Quantification All bones and teeth recovered from the excavations were examined and where possible identified to species and skeletal element using reference material from the comparative skeletal collection housed in the School of Conservation Sciences, Bournemouth University. Where appropriate, the following information was recorded for each fragment: context; element; anatomical zone; % completeness; fragmentation; surface condition; gnawing; fusion data; porosity; tooth ageing data; butchery marks; metrical data; other comments such as pathologies or association/articulation with other recorded fragments. The information was recorded onto a relational database (Microsoft Access) and cross-referenced with relevant contextual information such as date and feature type. Groups of four or more bones that belonged to the same skeleton (i.e. articulating bones or elements closely matched by size and age) were assigned an ‘Associated Bone Group number’. In some instances several separate bone groups were recorded for the same individual, for example where there were several articulating element groups from different body areas but with no clear proof that they came from the same carcass. A summary form was also created for each context. This contained brief notes about preservation; a preservation grade (very good; good; moderate; poor; very poor); the approximate size of the assemblage (very small - <10 specimens; small – 11-49 specimens; medium 50-99 specimens; large – 100-499 specimens; very large - >500 specimens); a list of species represented ranked by order of frequency; notes about highlighted specimens and general comments about the assemblage; bone group number and brief details about these groups.
    [Show full text]