DOCSLIB.ORG

Anglo-Canadian Relations from the British Perspective

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Anglo-Canadian Relations from the British Perspective The End of Imperial Diplomatic Unity, 1919-1928: Anglo-Canadian Relations from the British Perspective thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of London by Mary Kathleen McManus March 1992 UMI Number: U062B95 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U062395 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 -^ueses Library British Libraryof Political and Economic Science \iS> ABSTRACT During the first decade after the Great War, the relationship between Great Britain and Canada underwent profound changes: these years were significant in the transition of the British Empire to Commonwealth. One of these changes included Canada's severance from formal imperial diplomatic unity. From 1919 to 1928, Canada established the same complete control over its external affairs which it already enjoyed in its domestic affairs. Canada's break from imperial foreign policy was a major factor in Canada's evolution from subordinate status with respect to Britain to one of equality. As the senior Dominion, the action Canada took against Britain, by confronting Britain repeatedly in matters of foreign policy, made Canada a leader in the transition to Commonwealth. Events leading to Canada's legal disassociation from imperial foreign policy began with Resolution IX of the Imperial War Conference of 1917. Although recognition of changes in the imperial relationship came with the Balfour Declaration of 1926, it was the appointment of the first British High Commissioner to Ottawa in 1928 which confirmed Britain's participation in a new relationship with Canada. Resolution IX acknowledged that circumstances had changed in British-Dominion relations. The struggles over imperial foreign policy between 1919 and 1928 assisted in establishing the principle of equal status between Britain and the Dominions. These conflicts contributed to defining the evolution of the Anglo-Canadian relationship in its formal, legal sense. The Canadian involvement in these encounters has received a great deal of attention whereas the same cannot be said of the British side. Most historical writings have assumed that the reactions of Britain were consistently conservative and passive. The common supposition was that Britain reacted only when pressured by Canada. By reviewing these confrontations from the British perspective, this study will examine the attitudes of and the interaction among the British Cabinet, the Foreign and Colonial Offices in formulating a policy toward Canada in this era, and demonstrate that the transition to Commonwealth was neither inevitable nor smooth. 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS As I reflect upon the frustrations, loneliness and uncertainty which plagued me throughout and tempted me more than once to abandon the project, I am surprised that I have actually made it. But my reflections are not all bad because I also have the pleasant memories of all the people both in and beyond the history field who have given me assistance and much needed support. Among those who have been of great assistance, the British Council stands in a field by itself. The Council generously funded me for my three years in Britain and without this support I could never have undertaken this work. During my three years of research, my studies took me to many archives and libraries in Canada and in Britain. The able and willing staffs which assisted me wherever my research took me made my task substantially easier. Many people have given me support and encouragement at critical times in my historical studies. I regret that Professor Granter, one of the most important influences on my work in history, passed away before I completed my thesis. In one way, Professor Granter is to blame for my effort. It was while I was still a science student at Dalhousie University, Canada, that Professor Granter convinced me that the very least that I should do with my love of history would be to take a few more years and complete a degree in it. I am not sure that even he expected how far I would actually take my interest. I am sure, though, that he knew before I did of the pleasure and satisfaction I would derive with my further studies of history. I must also thank Professor Peter Burroughs and Professor P.B. Waite who not only guided me as an undergraduate, but also proved ever handy with words of encouragement and support when I lost confidence during this project. I was also fortunate to acquire during my stay in Britain other individuals who contributed to my efforts. I extend my thanks to John Barnes of the Government Department, London School of Economics, who aided me in accessing the Amery Diaries. I am also indebted to John Hilliker, Director of the Historical Division of the Canadian Department of External Affairs, for his insight and conversations about the historical treatment of the development of Canadian External Affairs. Wrestling with Canadian archival materials was made substantially easier because of Bill Russell, the Archives Officer at the Canadian High Commission during my time in Britain. The ever-enthusiastic support of Vivien Hughes of the Academic Relations at the Canadian High Commission bordered on blind faith, but I revelled in it regardless. I also must thank Vivien for linking me up with the British Association of Canadian Studies whose lively conferences and activities encouraged me that I was not studying British- Canadian relations in a vacuum. I extend my sincerest thanks to Dr. Robert Boyce who supervised this thesis. His skill in asking questions which at first appeared impossible to tackle were the very questions whose answers rested at the core of my thesis. Dr. Boyce also faced many hurdles as he challenged me to tackle my analysis with penetrating determination, clarity and precision. I sincerely hope that I have done him justice with this work. 5 Finally, I am indebted to my close friends and family who gave been nothing short of stoic throughout these last years. At times I found their faith in me unsubstantiated, but I never ceased to rely upon it. I extend a very special thanks to Julie Carroll and her editorial red pen. I apologise to her if I have alienated her from ever reading history again. I also am deeply in debt to Dr. Lieske Kuitert. Lieske has been truly an all-purpose friend, whose assistance ranged from giving patient, unflagging support to being a print and production assistant. My final word of thanks is reserved for my parents who certainly have proven their endurance by supporting me not only through this effort but throughout all the years leading up to this study. 6 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract 2 Acknowledgements 4 Table of Contents 7 Introduction 9 Chapter One SETTING THE STAGE FOR CHANGES 1900-1919 19 Chapter Two SETTING THE CAUSE BACK: 1919-1922 51 Chapter Three CANADIAN REPRESENTATION AT WASHINGTONS 1919-1926 100 Chapter Four THE AWAKENING CONSCIOUSNESS: 1922-1923 141 Chapter Five BRITAIN'S FIRST LABOUR GOVERNMENT AND ANGLO-CANADIAN RELATIONS 186 Chapter Six 1924—1926S THE LAST SUBSTANTIAL EFFORTS TO RETAIN FORMAL IMPERIAL DIPLOMATIC UNITY 220 7 Chapter Seven REDEFINING THE ROLE OF THE GOVERNOR GENERAL Chapter Eight 192 6-1928: THE BEGINNINGS OF A NEW ERA: THE APPOINTMENT A BRITISH HIGH COMMISSIONER TO CANADA Conclusion Bibliography INTRODUCTION Britain and its Dominions: Canada, South Africa, Australia and New Zealand, entered the First World War united members of the British Empire. They left the war still officially united. The Great War, however, initiated a series of events which ultimately ended the Dominions' role in the British Empire and eventually led to the Commonwealth in 1931. These events, which dramatically reshaped Britain's relations with its Dominions, centred primarily around the conduct of Britain's and the Dominions' shared foreign policy, frequently referred to as imperial diplomatic unity or imperial foreign policy. The struggles over imperial foreign policy began during the First World War and ended in 1926 when the Balfour Report shattered imperial diplomatic unity and each Dominion took control of its own foreign policy. This study will examine the reaction to the end of imperial diplomatic unity among British politicians and British civil servants in Whitehall. This study will examine and explore British reactions to the end of imperial diplomatic unity through an examination of British-Canadian relations 1919-1928. Of all the Dominions, Canada, the senior Dominion, was the most persistent in testing the boundaries of imperial unity. At times, Canada enjoyed the support of other Dominions, most notably South Africa and the Irish Free State, in its bid to break free from imperial diplomatic unity. No other Dominion, however, pursued the matter with Canada's single-minded consistency or spearheaded as many precedent- setting developments. As the senior Dominion, the impact of Canada's actions was decisive and far-reaching. Canada forced Whitehall to wrestle with issues Britain would have preferred to avoid. Canada's importance frequently caused Britain to tailor its responses to the attack on diplomatic unity to the Canadian context. The British Government recognised the centrality of Canada's position and the ramifications of Canada's actions. The struggles between Canada and Britain more often than not set both the agenda and the pace in the transition from Empire to Commonwealth.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • OECD/IMHE Project Self Evaluation Report: Atlantic Canada, Canada
    OECD/IMHE Project Supporting the Contribution of Higher Education Institutions to Regional Development Self Evaluation Report: Atlantic Canada, Canada Wade Locke (Memorial University), Elizabeth Beale (Atlantic Provinces Economic Council), Robert Greenwood (Harris Centre, Memorial University), Cyril Farrell (Atlantic Provinces Community College Consortium), Stephen Tomblin (Memorial University), Pierre-Marcel Dejardins (Université de Moncton), Frank Strain (Mount Allison University), and Godfrey Baldacchino (University of Prince Edward Island) December 2006 (Revised March 2007) ii Acknowledgements This self-evaluation report addresses the contribution of higher education institutions (HEIs) to the development of the Atlantic region of Canada. This study was undertaken following the decision of a broad group of partners in Atlantic Canada to join the OECD/IMHE project “Supporting the Contribution of Higher Education Institutions to Regional Development”. Atlantic Canada was one of the last regions, and the only North American region, to enter into this project. It is also one of the largest groups of partners to participate in this OECD project, with engagement from the federal government; four provincial governments, all with separate responsibility for higher education; 17 publicly funded universities; all colleges in the region; and a range of other partners in economic development. As such, it must be appreciated that this report represents a major undertaking in a very short period of time. A research process was put in place to facilitate the completion of this self-evaluation report. The process was multifaceted and consultative in nature, drawing on current data, direct input from HEIs and the perspectives of a broad array of stakeholders across the region. An extensive effort was undertaken to ensure that input was received from all key stakeholders, through surveys completed by HEIs, one-on-one interviews conducted with government officials and focus groups conducted in each province which included a high level of private sector participation.
    [Show full text]
  • "1919 Paris Peace Conference Centennial : Recollecting India's Representation and Participation" Monika Chansoria
    Policy Brief JuneJan 23 , 2019 Dr. Monika Chansoria is a 1919 Paris Peace Conference Tokyo-based Senior Visiting Fellow at The Japan Institute Centennial: Recollecting India’s of International Affairs. Representation and Participation Previously, she has held appointments at the Sandia Dr. Monika Chansoria National Laboratories (U.S.), Hokkaido University (Sapporo, The Paris Peace Conference opened on January 18, 1919, paving Japan), and Fondation Maison way for an ensuing legacy of peacemaking. It aimed at fortifying the des Sciences de l’Homme conceptual foundations in reference to the very essential premise on which peacemaking rests – i.e., bringing a conflict/war to a halt, (Paris). Dr. Chansoria has and thereafter initiating a diplomatic process that seeks to provide a authored five books including platform for initiating the process of reconciliation. Held at the Palace her latest work, China, Japan, of Versailles, the Peace Conference saw delegates from 27 parties, and Senkaku Islands: Conflict with rigorous deliberations and recommendations that eventually got in the East China Sea Amid an included into the Treaty of Versailles with Germany, held at the Hall American Shadow (Routledge of Mirrors at Versailles, on June 28, 1919. © 2018). India and the Paris Peace Conference India’s representation and participation in the 1919 peace conference holds special mention especially since India, at that time, was under the colonial rule of the British Empire. According to the Interpretation Act of 1889 (Sec. 18 {5}) India came to be defined
    [Show full text]
  • THE SPECIAL COUNCILS of LOWER CANADA, 1838-1841 By
    “LE CONSEIL SPÉCIAL EST MORT, VIVE LE CONSEIL SPÉCIAL!” THE SPECIAL COUNCILS OF LOWER CANADA, 1838-1841 by Maxime Dagenais Dissertation submitted to the School of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the PhD degree in History. Department of History Faculty of Arts Université d’Ottawa\ University of Ottawa © Maxime Dagenais, Ottawa, Canada, 2011 ii ABSTRACT “LE CONSEIL SPÉCIAL EST MORT, VIVE LE CONSEIL SPÉCIAL!” THE SPECIAL COUNCILS OF LOWER CANADA, 1838-1841 Maxime Dagenais Supervisor: University of Ottawa, 2011 Professor Peter Bischoff Although the 1837-38 Rebellions and the Union of the Canadas have received much attention from historians, the Special Council—a political body that bridged two constitutions—remains largely unexplored in comparison. This dissertation considers its time as the legislature of Lower Canada. More specifically, it examines its social, political and economic impact on the colony and its inhabitants. Based on the works of previous historians and on various primary sources, this dissertation first demonstrates that the Special Council proved to be very important to Lower Canada, but more specifically, to British merchants and Tories. After years of frustration for this group, the era of the Special Council represented what could be called a “catching up” period regarding their social, commercial and economic interests in the colony. This first section ends with an evaluation of the legacy of the Special Council, and posits the theory that the period was revolutionary as it produced several ordinances that changed the colony’s social, economic and political culture This first section will also set the stage for the most important matter considered in this dissertation as it emphasizes the Special Council’s authoritarianism.
    [Show full text]
  • Eight History Lessons Grade 8
    Eight History Lessons Grade 8 Submitted By: Rebecca Neadow 05952401 Submitted To: Ted Christou CURR 355 Submitted On: November 15, 2013 INTRODUCTORY ACTIVITY OVERVIEW This is an introductory assignment for students in a grade 8 history class dealing with the Red River Settlement. LEARNING GOAL AND FOCUSING QUESTION - During this lesson students activate their prior knowledge and connections to gain a deeper understanding of the word Rebellion and what requires to set up a new settlement. CURRICULUM EXPECTATIONS - Interpret and analyse information and evidence relevant to their investigations, using a variety of tools. MATERIALS - There are certain terms students will need to understand within this lesson. They are: 1. Emigrate – to leave one place or country in order to settle in another 2. Lord Selkirk – Scottish born 5th Earl of Selkirk, used his money to buy the Hudson’s Bay Company in order to get land to establish a settlement on the Red River in Rupert’s Land in 1812 3. Red River – a river that flows North Dakota north into Lake Winnipeg 4. Exonerate – to clear or absolve from blame or a criminal charge 5. Hudson’s Bay Company – an English company chartered in 1670 to trade in all parts of North America drained by rivers flowing into Hudson’s Bay 6. North West Company – a fur trading business headquartered in Montréal from 1779 to 1821 which competed, often violently, with the Hudson’s Bay Company until it merged with the Hudson’s Bay Company in 1821 7. Rupert’s Land – the territories granted by Charles II of England to the Hudson’s Bay Company in 1670 and ceded to the Canadian government in 1870 - For research: textbook, computer, dictionaries or whatever you have available to you.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1: Introduction
    AN ANALYSIS OF THE 1875-1877 SCARLET FEVER EPIDEMIC OF CAPE BRETON ISLAND, NOVA SCOTIA ___________________________________________________________ A Dissertation presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School University of Missouri-Columbia ___________________________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy ___________________________________________________________ by JOSEPH MACLEAN PARISH Dr. Lisa Sattenspiel, Dissertation Supervisor DECEMBER 2004 © Copyright by Joseph MacLean Parish 2004 All Rights Reserved Dedication This dissertation is dedicated to the people of Cape Breton and in particular the people of Chéticamp, both past and present. Your enduring spirits, your pioneering efforts and your selfless approach to life stand out amongst all peoples. Without these qualities in you and your ancestors, none of this would have been possible. Acknowledgements I would first like to thank my fiancée Demmarest who has been a constant source of support throughout the process of creating this dissertation and endured my stress with me every step of the way. I will never forget your patience and selflessness. My mother Ginny was a steady source of encouragement and strength since my arrival in Missouri so shortly after the passing of my father. Your love knows no bounds mom. I would also like to thank my close friends who have believed in me throughout my entire academic “career” and supported my choices including, in no particular order, Mickey ‘G’, Alexis Dolphin, Rhonda Bathurst, Michael Pierce, Jason Organ and Ahmed Abu-Dalou. I owe special thanks to my aunt and uncle, Muriel and Earl “Curly” Gray of Sydney, Nova Scotia, and my cousins Wallace, Carole, Crystal and Michelle AuCoin and Auguste Deveaux of Chéticamp, Nova Scotia for being my gracious hosts numerous times throughout the years of my research.
    [Show full text]
  • Dominions, Great Britain and Questions Related to Imperial Foreign Policy Implementation and Direction in the 1920S and at the Beginning of the 1930S
    i i i i West Bohemian Historical Review VI j 2016 j 2 Dominions, Great Britain and Questions Related to Imperial Foreign Policy Implementation and Direction in the 1920s and at the Beginning of the 1930s Jaroslav Valkoun∗ The study focuses on the problems of British-Dominion relations with a special regard to the share of the Dominions in formation, execution and direction of the imperial for- eign policy in the 1920s and at the beginning of the 1930s. In the post war period, it was expected that recognition of a formal independence and a new international status of the British Dominions would be take place. Concurrently with a wider conception of the Dominion autonomy, a more intensive cooperation was realised within the Em- pire, which gradually led to a bigger interest of the overseas autonomous units in the decision-making process concerning the direction of the imperial foreign policy. The observed problems concentrated on two main fronts, it means the measure of consul- tations among the mother country and the Dominions and individual foreign policy questions, crisis, incidents and events that, in reality, contributed to a discussion con- cerning the share of overseas autonomous units in the formation and execution of the Imperial foreign policy from the side of the British Foreign Office. Balfour Declaration adoption, increasing the importance of the Dominions, began the period that was sig- nificant with pacification of debates concerning execution of the imperial foreign policy and during which it was necessary to wait for next few years for this status legislative approval till the adoption of the Statute of Westminster in December 1931.
    [Show full text]
  • General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade Accord General Sur Les Tarifs Douaniers Et Le Commerce
    GENERAL AGREEMENT ACCORD GENERAL SUR RESTRICTED . \•. C0T/w/l44 ON TARIFFS AND LES TARIFS DOUANIERS 5 June 1972 TRADE ET LE COMMERCE Special Distribution Cotton Textiles Committee Comité des textiles de coton (5-7 June 1972) (5-7 juin 1972) LIST OF REPRESENTATIVES - LISTE DES REPRESENTANTS Chairman Mr. 0. LONG (Director-General) Président' ARGENTINA Représentante Sr. J.A. Livingston • Consejero economico y comercial, Mision Permanente ante la Oficina de las Naciones Unidas en Ginebra AUSTRALIA Representatives Mr. B. F. Meere Minister (Commercial), Permanent Mission to the Office of the United Nations at Geneva Mr. J.V. McMahon Counsellor (Commercial), Permanent Mission to the Office of the United Nations at Geneva AUSTRIA A Representative Mr. Gottfried Dinzl Director, Federal Ministry for Trade and Industry Adviser Mr» Helmut Huber Federal Chamber of Commerce BELGIQUE Représentants M. R. De Smaele Directeur, Ministère des Affaires étrangères et du Commerce extérieur Mlle.C.A.T. Kirschen Premier secrétaire, Mission permanente auprès de l'Office des Nations Unies à Genève Secretary of Coamittee: Mr. M. Salib, Annex II, Tel. Ext. 2018/4476 Conference Officer: Miss S. Niklaus, Villa Le Bocage, Tel. Ext. 4422 COT/W/lAA Page 2 BELGIQUE Représentants (suite) Mme J. De Clercq Ingénieur en chef, Directeur, Ministère des Affaires économiques M.. S. Taloen... Premier conseiller, Ministère des Affaires économiques CANADA Repres entatives Mr. Campbell Stuart General Director, Office of Special Import Policy, Department of Industry, Trade and Commerce Mr. L. Howey iiCting General Director, Apparel and Textiles Branch, Department of Industry, Trade and Commerce Mr. J.P. Clark Tariffs, Trade and Aid Branch, Department of Finance Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Proquest Dissertations
    UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY In the National Interest - Borden and the Siberian Intervention, 1918-19 by Lucas Stephen Thomas Ker A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY CALGARY, ALBERTA JULY 2011 © Lucas Stephen Thomas Ker Library and Archives Bibliotheque et 1*1 Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON MAOISM Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre riterence ISBN: 978-0-494-81402-4 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-81402-4 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non­ support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la these ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Advice of Ministers, but to Extend Or Withhold Pardon Or Reprieve
    10 THE CONSTITUTION AND GOVERNMENT OF CANADA the advice of ministers, but to extend or withhold pardon or reprieve according to his own judgment (one of the last prerogatives to disappear in the case of the Sovereign). The then Canadian Minister of Justice, Hon. Edward Blake, secured in 1878 the issuance of a new set of instructions, in which the only provision that the Governor-General might act except on the advice of Ministers related to the exercise of the pardoning power, providing that in cases where a pardon or reprieve might affect Imperial interests, the Governor- General should take these interests into his personal consideration in conjunction with the advice of his Ministers. The development of inter-Imperial relations up to the Great War may be studied in the records of the Colonial Conference. In the first Colonial Conference of 1887, we have a purely consultative gathering in calling which the chief aim of the British Government was probably to devise a method of more effective co-operation in defence. After a second, but constitutionally unimportant Confer­ ence had been held in Ottawa in 1894, the third Colonial Conference, attended only by Prime Ministers, was held in London in 1897, and the fourth, which Dominion Ministers attended to assist their Prime Ministers, in London in 1902. At the latter Conference a resolution was passed favouring the holding of such Conferences at intervals not exceeding four years at which "questions of common interest could be discussed and considered as between the Colonial Secretary and the Prime Ministers of the self-governing Colonies.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Fractured Empire: Ideas of Imperial Citizenship in the British Empire after the First World War Dan Gorman ABSTRACT Der Erste Weltkrieg brachte Bürger aus Großbritannien, und Untertanen aus den britischen Dominions und dem Kolonialreich zusammen, sowohl auf dem Schlachtfeld als auch hinter der Kampffont. Er hat sie auch unter einem historischen Rahmen vereinigt, was in den Nach- kriegsjahren zu einer intensiven Beschäftigung mit den rassischen und legalen Widersprüchen der Staatsbürgerschaft des Britischen Empire führte. Der Krieg verursachte eine engere Zusam- menarbeit zwischen Großbritannien und den Dominions an Fragen von gemeinsamem Inte- resse, vertieft durch eine gemeinsame Loyalität zum britischen Empire, eine Verbundenheit der weißen Rassen, und eine gemeinsame Kriegserfahrung. Immerhin verlangten die Politiker aus den Dominions größere Autonomie auf Grund derer Kriegsleistungen und Nationalisten in den Kolonien setzten sich für mehr Bürgerechte für ihre Wählerschaft ein. Dieser Artikel untersucht die rhetorischen, rechtlichen, moralischen, und materiellen Aspekte der Staatsbürgerschaft des Britischen Empire während des Ersten Weltkriegs und in den Jahren danach. Die verschie- denen Formen der Loyalität zum Britischen Empire und der koloniale Nationalismus, die die Untertanen des Empire zur Teilnahme an Großbritanniens globalen Krieg motivierten, werden erläutert. Auch untersucht wird wie der Krieg größere Zusammenarbeit sowie mehr Konflikte innerhalb des Britischen Empire verursachte, und die Entstehung in der Zwischenkriegszeit von antikolonialen Loyalitäten sowie weißen Loyalitäten zum Britischen Empire. The First World War was a global conflict, in no small part due to the British Empire’s participation. Imperial subjects were united through common allegiance to the Crown, and were at war when Britain entered the conflict in 1914. India contributed over 1.3 million soldiers and labourers to the war effort.
    [Show full text]
  • British Dominions and Foreign Relations Herbert A
    Cornell Law Review Volume 12 Article 1 Issue 1 December 1926 British Dominions and Foreign Relations Herbert A. Smith Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Herbert A. Smith, British Dominions and Foreign Relations , 12 Cornell L. Rev. 1 (1926) Available at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr/vol12/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cornell Law Review by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Cornell Law Quarterly VOLU1E XII DECEMBER, 1926 NUMBER 1 The British Dominions and Foreign Relations* HERBERT A. SMITHt If there is any truth at all in the common statement that the British Constitution is "unwritten" it is a truth which needs some- what careful explanation. In point of fact, practically the whole operation of government, both in the mother country and abroad, is at the present time carried on under express statutory powers. In a few instances, of which the most important is the conduct of foreign affairs, executive action is based upon the ancient common law pre- rogative of the Crown, but in all cases, whatever is done, is done in virtue of some definite law capable of ascertainment in the courts. To define the exact legal powers of any organ of government is seldom more difficult, and is usually much easier, in the British Empire than under the highly intricate federal system of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Bermuda Agreement 1945
    CRESC Working Paper Series Working Paper No. 99 The Bermuda Agreement 1945 Richard Collins CRESC, Open University May 2010 For further Centre for Research on Socio-Cultural Change (CRESC) information: Faculty of Social Sciences, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA, UK Tel: +44 (0)1908 654458 Fax: +44 (0)1908 654488 Email: [email protected] or [email protected] Web: UUwww.cresc.ac.uk The Bermuda Agreement 1945 Richard Collins Abstract The end of the Second World War saw the renegotiation of the governance of global telecommunications. The dominant incumbent, the British Imperial (later Commonwealth) network centred on the Cable and Wireless company, experienced multiple changes: the tightly integrated and collaborative imperial governance system fell away as the governing partners (notably Australia, Canada, New Zealand, South Africa and the UK) increasingly pursued their own, rather than a collective agendas; Cable and Wireless’ historical monopoly began to give way to a competition and interconnection based regime as American firms and their networks demanded interconnection with the Imperial “legacy” network; and Cable and Wireless was nationalised. Though key elements of the Bermuda Agreement sealed at the Bermuda Conference of 1945 were soon to be renegotiated, the Conference, at which the old global hegemony, centred on the UK and its partners, negotiated a new global communications order to accommodate the new global hegemonic power, the USA, was the fulcrum event of these transitions. Drawing on primary
    [Show full text]