DOCSLIB.ORG

An Instructed Eucharist at Zion Episcopal Church by the Reverend Sarah E. Saxe February 12, 2017 (Year A, Epiphany 6) Postures

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Instructed Eucharist at Zion Episcopal Church by the Reverend Sarah E. Saxe February 12, 2017 (Year A, Epiphany 6) Postures An Instructed Eucharist at Zion Episcopal Church By the Reverend Sarah E. Saxe February 12, 2017 (Year A, Epiphany 6) Postures When worshipping God or praying to God, what were the postures of our ancestors – the ancient Hebrews? Today’s reading from Deuteronomy (30:15-20) tells us: We bow down. This posture appears 33 times in the Old Testament. The purpose of the Solemn Bow – bowing at the waist (demonstrate) - is to “acknowledge the sacredness of an object or person.” This morning I not only bowed to the altar but then I turned and bowed to you, for I believe that each of you is sacred. Remnants of this Old Testament bow are seen here at Zion: when the symbol of Christ, the cross passes by, we make a solemn bow; when the altar party reverences the altar; at the affirmation of the incarnation during the Nicene Creed (make solemn bow, “he came down from heaven…”); and during the first part of the Sanctus (bow, “Holy Holy Holy Lord…). And people in other churches may bow down before the Blessed Sacrament – the body and blood of Christ. Another remnant of the ancient Hebrew bow is seen during Lent when, instead of a Blessing, the deacon invites a Solemn Prayer by bidding the people to “Bow down before the Lord.” You’ll hear these words in a couple of weeks. And yet another remnant appears during the reading of the Passion on Palm Sunday. A period of silence follows the section where Jesus dies. The people may kneel or make a solemn bow during that period. Then the narrator stands and when she resumes reading, the people stand. I believe the tradition here at Zion is to kneel. (pause) The Simple Bow evolved from the Solemn Bow. Since we regard Jesus as a sacred person and we believe Jesus is here with us in worship, some of us may bow our heads every time the name of Jesus is mentioned and on other occasions of reverence (gesture holding up Gospel book, “the Holy Gospel of our Lord…”). So from the ancient Hebrews we inherit the Solemn Bow. Another posture is found 23 times in the Old Testament and 3 times in the Gospels. “He fell on his face…” Including Jesus who fell on his face before God in the garden. (demonstrate) A remnant of that posture remains to this day in the Good Friday service. It’s called Prostration. At the start of the Service, after walking down the aisle in silence, the Altar party kneels or prostrates for silent prayer. “After a substantial period of silence, the celebrant alone stands and says the acclamation.” Here at Zion the tradition is for the altar party to kneel, but I attended a church in Cupertino, California where the whole altar party prostrated in silence. It was quite powerful. So when worshipping God or praying to God, our Hebrew ancestors gave us the Solemn Bow and Prostration. What about our ancestors – the first Christians? The orans position. (demonstration) According to Gail Ramshaw, “The earliest depictions of Christians at prayer show them in the orans position. In the liturgy, the orans is the appropriate gesture for all prayers” that are said, not sung, by both the priest and the people. The orans “is a stance of openness and vulnerability to God, as well as a gesture of reaching toward God.” The Orthodox Church continues to use the orans posture to pray. And many of the Protestant Pentecostal churches do as well. Why don’t we do that today? Mainly because we can read. For many churches, including ours, the prayers are printed in a book or bulletin which we need to hold while praying. But have you noticed that the new Prayers of the People are in a responsorial format in which the Intercessor says a petition, concluding with a cue phrase and the people respond with an easy-to-memorize phrase. This encourages us to put down the paper and lift our hands. Perhaps you might consider trying that today. Furthermore, even though the early Church didn’t stand in the orans position when singing, lots of people, including Episcopalians seem to instinctively raise their hands during some hymns. For example, at the Convention we sang I the Lord of sea and sky. I looked about me during the refrain, “Here I am Lord. Is it I Lord?” Not only I but many around me had put down their bulletin and were in the orans posture. Another reason why the Eastern Christians – the Orthodox Church - continue to use the orans is because of its focus on the activity of the Holy Spirit – not on penitence. Which leads me to ask, when worshipping God or praying to God, what were the postures of our ancestors – the Roman Catholic Church? The focus of worship in the Western Church was on the forgiveness of sins. And what is a common posture when we seek forgiveness? (demonstrate) But kneeling became a common posture at many points in the Mass. It symbolized unworthiness, penitence, piety, and adoration of the “Blessed Sacrament” (Christ’s body and blood). Scholars do not know when the practice of kneeling started. There is no evidence that early Christians did so; yet the Council of Nicea in the fourth century forbade kneeling, arguing that one shouldn’t kneel during Sunday worship since every Sunday is a little Easter – a time to celebrate the risen Lord – to celebrate God’s forgiveness and our salvation. A piece of trivia: the altar rail come into use in the 17th century; originally a low fence to protect the altar from irreverence by keeping out stray animals. Kneeling at this barrier to receive communion was not its original purpose, but once the practice was established, Altar Rails continued to be built just for this purpose even though there is no longer a danger of stray animals entering the chancel (which is not the case where I served in the Dominican Republic). Another posture we inherited from the Roman Catholic Church was genuflecting. It is an alternative to the solemn bow but more restricted in use. A practice begun during the middle ages, genuflecting is a sign of reverence made to the Reserved Sacrament or after elevating the host and chalice or after the doxology. Its purpose is to recognize the sacred symbolism of the bread and wine. Nowadays, many worshippers genuflect prior to sitting in their pew, regardless of whether the Reserved Sacrament is present. When worshipping God or praying to God, what were the postures of our ancestors – the Church of England? All of the above! But as literacy increased, the orans posture was replaced by Standing. The practice of kneeling remained despite the Black Rubric - a declaration inserted in the 1552 Prayer Book to explain that the practice of kneeling to receive Holy Communion intended no adoration of any ‘real and essential presence’ of Christ’s natural flesh and blood. Since it was not a true rubric this declaration was printed in black and not (as it sometimes was) in red. (Rubric comes from Latin, ruber, meaning red. Rubrics were written instructions for who should be doing what during the Mass.) The Black Rubric discouraged adoration of the Blessed Sacrament but it didn’t discourage kneeling as a posture for humility or penitence or petition. When worshipping God or praying to God, what were the postures of our ancestors of the Episcopal Church? Still quite similar to the 1552 English Prayer Book…until the 1982 Book of Common Prayer – our current book – which represents a transition from a theology of sin and Jesus’ death to a theology of Baptism and resurrection. It also represents a movement back to our ancient roots and so, in its rubrics, it stresses standing over kneeling. Yet it acknowledges the need for a special posture during times of penitence or solemnity. (pause) So we have all these options to involve our body in worshipping and praying to God. What then shall we do? Whatever you feel called to do. And when you bow or kneel or stand or genuflect, think not so much about what it means but what it does. What does your posture do in regard to your relationship with God? What does your posture do for your relationship with each other? What does your posture do for your relationship with yourself? .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Messenger August 2020
    The Messenger August 2020 Rector’s Corner With a few services under our belt now following the Phase 4 guidelines for returning to in-person worship, we continue to warm up the changes: two service times, masks, socially distant seating, no music or passing of the peace, and communion of one kind. These changes might have been, and may still be, difficult to accept, but you, the people of Grace, have shown the utmost patience and resilience throughout this pandemic. As we continue to adapt, I thought we might have a little fun with church history and go back in time to look at a few of the more curious changes that came out of our origin story, the English Reformation, and our roots in the Church of England. Henry VIII’s split from the Church in Rome in the 1530s plunged the English Church into more than a century-long identity crisis, with traditionalists and reformers playing tug of war for the Church’s soul, heaving back and forth on the rope that was the spectrum of catholic-to-reformed proclivities. All the while, the changing inclinations of the monarchy, now the head of the Church of England, dictated from above. Liturgically speaking, the way we conduct communion now is probably the most glaring change apart from the absence of singing. No longer do we use the altar rail and kneel. The congre- gation approaches the chancel steps single-file, and I dispense the body of Christ with a small pair of salad tongs I requisitioned from the kitchen and sanitized.
    [Show full text]
  • Praying with Body, Mind, and Voice
    Praying with Body, Mind, and Voice n the celebration of Mass we raise our hearts and SITTING minds to God. We are creatures of body as well as Sitting is the posture of listening and meditation, so the Ispirit, so our prayer is not confined to our minds congregation sits for the pre-Gospel readings and the and hearts. It is expressed by our bodies as well. homily and may also sit for the period of meditation fol- When our bodies are engaged in our prayer, we pray lowing Communion. All should strive to assume a seated with our whole person. Using our entire being in posture during the Mass that is attentive rather than prayer helps us to pray with greater attentiveness. merely at rest. During Mass we assume different postures— standing, kneeling, sitting—and we are also invited PROCESSIONS to make a variety of gestures. These postures and gestures are not merely ceremonial. They have pro- Every procession in the Liturgy is a sign of the pilgrim found meaning and, when done with understand- Church, the body of those who believe in Christ, on ing, can enhance our participation in the Mass. their way to the Heavenly Jerusalem. The Mass begins with the procession of the priest and ministers to the altar. The Book of the Gospels is carried in procession to the ambo. The gifts of bread and wine are brought STANDING forward to the altar. Members of the assembly come for- Standing is a sign of respect and honor, so we stand as ward in procession—eagerly, attentively, and devoutly— the celebrant who represents Christ enters and leaves to receive Holy Communion.
    [Show full text]
  • The Routledge Handbook of Early Christian Art Christian Sarcophagi
    This article was downloaded by: 10.3.98.104 On: 29 Sep 2021 Access details: subscription number Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG, UK The Routledge Handbook of Early Christian Art Robin M. Jensen, Mark D. Ellison Christian Sarcophagi from Rome Publication details https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315718835-3 Jutta Dresken-Weiland Published online on: 20 May 2018 How to cite :- Jutta Dresken-Weiland. 20 May 2018, Christian Sarcophagi from Rome from: The Routledge Handbook of Early Christian Art Routledge Accessed on: 29 Sep 2021 https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315718835-3 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR DOCUMENT Full terms and conditions of use: https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/legal-notices/terms This Document PDF may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproductions, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The publisher shall not be liable for an loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material. 3 CHRISTIAN SARCOPHAGI FROM ROME Jutta Dresken-Weiland Because they are so numerous, Christian sarcophagi from Rome are the most important group of objects for the creation and invention of a Christian iconography.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Crossing Bearing and Life in a Lutheran
    Crossing Bearing and Life in a Lutheran Synod: What Can We Learn from Hermann Sasse? The Emmaus Conference Tacoma, Washington 1-2 May 2014 “The Lutheran Churches are still sunning themselves in the delusion that they have something to expect from the world other than the dear holy cross, which all those must carry who proclaim God’s Law and the Gospel of Jesus Christ to mankind. But this delusion will soon disappear”1 so wrote Hermann Sasse in March, 1949. While not exactly equivalent to synods in North American Lutheranism, Hermann Sasse 2(1895-1976) had his own experience with church governments as places for bearing the cross in Germany and later on in Australia. A son of a church of the Prussian Union, Sasse would become a member of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Bavaria, and eventually he would leave that body to immigrate to Australia where he would become a member of the United Evangelical Lutheran Church in Australia and then after that body’s merger with the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Australia, the Lutheran Church of Australia. I propose that Sasse suggests not only a theology of the cross but an ecclesiology of the cross. As Udo Schnelle would put it: “The existence of the church itself is already an application of the theology of the cross.” 3Not long after re-locating to Australia, Sasse would write one of his “letters to Lutheran pastors” on the theologia crucis. This letter, a brilliant and concise introduction to Luther’s conceptuality of the theology of the cross; it also has ramifications for the theme of this paper, cross bearing in the life of a Lutheran Synod.
    [Show full text]
  • Prayer and Piety: the Orans-Figure in the Christian Catacombs of Rome
    PRAYER AND PIETY: THE ORANS-FIGURE IN THE CHRISTIAN CATACOMBS OF ROME M.A. Thesis by REITA J. SUTHERLAND Presented to the Department of Classics and Religious Studies UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA Supervised by Dr. Jitse H.F. Dijkstra © Reita J. Sutherland, Ottawa, Canada, 2013 Table of Contents Table of Contents ................................................................................................................. i Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................ iii Abstract ............................................................................................................................ iv General Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1 The Development of Christian Art: Origins of the Genre .........................................5 Towards as Philosophy of Images ...........................................................................15 Outline of Work .......................................................................................................18 Chapter One: The Precursors of the Orans ....................................................................... 21 The Adorans ............................................................................................................24 The Pietas Orans .....................................................................................................27 Conclusion ...............................................................................................................35
    [Show full text]
  • Anglican Worship and Sacramental Theology 1
    The Beauty of Holiness: Anglican Worship and Sacramental Theology 1 THE CONGRESS OF TRADITIONAL ANGLICANS June 1–4, 2011 - Victoria, BC, Canada An Address by The Reverend Canon Kenneth Gunn-Walberg, Ph.D. Rector of St. Mary’s, Wilmington, Delaware After Morning Prayer Friday in Ascensiontide, June 3, 2011 THE BEAUTY OF HOLINESS: ANGLICAN WORSHIP AND SACRAMENTAL THEOLOGY When I was approached by Fr. Sinclair to make this presentation, he suggested that the conceptual framework of the lectures would be that they be positive presentations of traditional Anglican principles from both a biblical and historical perspective and in the light of the contemporary issues in contrast to traditional Anglicanism, especially as expressed in the Affirmation of St. Louis and in the 39 Articles. The rubrics attached to this paper were that Anglican worship should be examined in the light of contemporary liturgies, the Roman Rite, and the proposed revision of the Book of Common Prayer to bring it in line with Roman views. This perforce is a rather tall order; so let us begin. The late Pulitzer Prize winning poet W.H. Auden stated that the Episcopal Church “seems to have gone stark raving mad…And why? The Roman Catholics have had to start from scratch, and as any of them with a feeling for language will admit, they have made a cacophonous horror of the mass. Whereas we had the extraordinary good fortune in that our Prayer Book was composed at exactly the right historical moment. The English language had become more or less what it is today…but the ecclesiastics of the 16 th century still professed a feeling for the ritual and ceremonies which today we have almost entirely lost.” 1 While one might quibble somewhat with what he said, he certainly would have been more indignant had he witnessed me little more than a decade after his death celebrating the Eucharist before the Dean and Canons of St.
    [Show full text]
  • The Orante and the Goddess in the Roman Catacombs
    THE ORANTE AND THE GODDESS IN THE ROMAN CATACOMBS Valerie Abrahamsen ABSTRACT The Orante, or Orans, figure, a very common and important symbol in early Christian art, is difficult to interpret. Theories of what she meant to early Christians, especially Roman Christians who buried their dead in the catacombs, range from a representation of the soul of the deceased to a symbol of filial piety. In this article, I will attempt to show that the Orante figure originates with the prehistoric goddess, the all-encom- passing Nature deity worshipped for millennia throughout the Mediterranean world. While many early Christians super- imposed Christian meaning on her, it is likely that other Christians still viewed her in conjunction with the earlier Nature goddess of birth, life, death and rebirth, even as they worshipped God in male form. Introduction he Orante or Orans, generally a female figure with open eyes and upraised hands, is a pervasive symbol in early TChristian art, perhaps “the most important symbol in early Christian art.”1 Found frequently in the late second-century art in the Roman catacombs, as well as in sculpture, her head is almost always covered with a veil, and she wears a tunic. She exists both as a separate symbol and as the main figure in a number of Biblical scenes, but rarely in masculine form with male clothing. Instead, she frequently stands in for male figures in scenes of deliverance—she becomes Noah in the ark, Jonah in the boat and spewed out of the whale, Daniel between the lions, and the three young men in the fiery furnace.
    [Show full text]
  • And Post-Vatican Ii (1943-1986 American Mariology)
    FACULTAS THEOLOGICA "MARIANUM" MARIAN LffiRARY INSTITUTE (UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON) TITLE: THE HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF BIBLICAL MARIOLOGY PRE- AND POST-VATICAN II (1943-1986 AMERICAN MARIOLOGY) A thesis submitted to The Theological Faculty "Marianwn" In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Licentiate of Sacred Theology By: James J. Tibbetts, SFO Director: Reverend Bertrand A. Buby, SM Thesis at: Marian Library Institute Dayton, Ohio, USA 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 The Question of Development I. Introduction - Status Questionis 1 II. The Question of Historical Development 2 III. The Question of Biblical Theological Development 7 Footnotes 12 Chapter 2 Historical Development of Mariology I. Historical Perspective Pre- to Post Vatican Emphasis A. Mariological Movement - Vatican I to Vatican II 14 B. Pre-Vatican Emphasis on Scripture Scholarship 16 II. Development and Decline in Mariology 19 III. Development and Controversy: Mary as Church vs. Mediatrix A. The Mary-Church Relationship at Vatican II 31 B. Mary as Mediatrix at Vatican II 37 c. Interpretations of an Undeveloped Christology 41 Footnotes 44 Chapter 3 Development of a Biblical Mariology I. Biblical Mariology A. Development towards a Biblical Theology of Mary 57 B. Developmental Shift in Mariology 63 c. Problems of a Biblical Mariology 67 D. The Place of Mariology in the Bible 75 II. Symbolism, Scripture and Marian Theology A. The Meaning of Symbol 82 B. Marian Symbolism 86 c. Structuralism and Semeiotics 94 D. The Development of Two Schools of Thought 109 Footnotes 113 Chapter 4 Comparative Development in Mariology I. Comparative Studies - Scriptural Theology 127 A. Richard Kugelman's Commentary on the Annunciation 133 B.
    [Show full text]
  • Lt Commentaries, Euch 2004 6, Dec 2010
    1 THE STUDY OF LITURGY: THE EUCHARIST IN THE BOOK OF COMMON PRAYER 2004 COMMENTARY BY THE REVD CANON M.C. KENNEDY, M.A., B.D., Ph.D. TOGETHER WITH SERMONS ON EUCHARISTIC DOCTRINE PREACHED IN TWO CATHEDRALS CONTENTS Part 1 (Celebration of the Eucharist, general principles) 5 Constitution and Canons 5 General Directions for Public Worship 15 PART TWO (Celebration of the Eucharist, commentary and guidelines) A. Traditional Rite, Holy Communion One 17 (1) Preparation 17 (2) The Service - from the Lord’s Prayer to the Collect 19 (3) The Service - The Ministry of the Word 21 (4) The Service - Offertory and the Prayer for the Church Militant 22 (5) The Service - Long Exhortations to Comfortable Words 25 (6) The Service - Sursum Corda, Preface and Sanctus 25 (7) The Service - Prayer of Humble Access and Prayer of Consecration 27 (8) The Service - Communion of priest and people 29 (9) The Service - Lord’s Prayer and Post-Communion Prayers 30 (10) The Service - Gloria in Excelsis and the Blessing 31 (11) The Service - Disposal of the elements and the ablutions 31 (12) The Service - Procession to Vestry and Vestry Prayers 32 The Exhortations 33 The Declaration on Kneeling 34 Notes authorized by the General Synod for Holy Communion One 35 Part Three (Celebration of the Eucharist, commentary and guidelines) B. Modern Language Rites, Holy Communion Two 37 (1) Preparation 37 (2) Comparison with traditional rite 37 (3) Commentary on the Order of Service 38 The Structure of the Service 39 The Gathering of God’s People 39 The Greeting 39 The Collect for
    [Show full text]
  • Different at Mass?
    Dear Father Kerper Why does everyone do something different at Mass? ear Father Kerper: I attend Mass at several parishes in New Hampshire and I’m becoming confused. In some parishes people hold hands during the Our Father. In others I see people raising their hands like the priest at the altar. Also, I find the sign D of peace a huge distraction. Isn’t it a throwback to the 1960s? More and more, I find it difficult to pray because everyone does things in a different way. These are great questions to the sign of peace, folded hands during the necessary connection between consider as we are preparing for the prayer, and genuflection to honor and reconciliation and worthy reception of new translation of the Mass. This is acknowledge the Eucharistic Presence. the Eucharist. By the sixth century, the an important time to think about These postures and gestures two acts had become so intertwined the meaning behind the words we have deep meaning and should that those unable to receive Holy speak and the gestures we use during never become mere habits. Rather, Communion because of grave sin were Mass. Your multiple questions touch they should always reflect what is instructed to refrain from sharing the upon three interconnected issues: the happening to us spiritually. sign of peace. importance of physical gestures in public The sign of peace still seems “new” worship; the tension between tradition to many people because it gradually and innovation; and the need to balance “During public worship, disappeared centuries ago. It survived communal and individual preferences.
    [Show full text]
  • The Jesus Movement and the World of the Early Church Is a Solid
    The Jesus Movement and the World of the Early Church is a solid, sim- ple, straightforward introduction for the undergraduate or general reader to the Jesus movement in its complex cultural and histori- cal world. The people, places, and objects of that world are clearly explained in text and glossaries. This is an excellent resource for the beginning reader. —Carolyn Osiek, RSCJ, Archivist, Society of the Sacred Heart United States-Canada Province Sheila McGinn’s book [The Jesus Movement and the World of the Early Church] is a masterful example of an important and difficult genre: the scholar’s presentation, for an intelligent and educated but non- specialist audience, of . the development of Christianity from Jesus to the period of the apostolic fathers. [She treats] all the New Testament writings and some of the early noncanonical writ- ings in their sociopolitical, economic, and religious contexts. In the process she educates her readers in how to handle ancient historical writings. This will be a valuable text for beginning theology students, parish education programs, and independent lay readers. —Sandra M. Schneiders Jesuit School of Theology, Santa Clara University The Jesus Movement and the World of the Early Church is a fascinat- ing, decade-by-decade synopsis of earliest Christianity from Caesar Augustus through Emperor Trajan. Using visual and material culture alongside biblical, Greek, and Latin writings, McGinn has written a condensed version of the history from Jesus through Bishop Ignatius that summarizes most New Testament writings, the Didache, and 1 Clement. An especially notable aspect of her book is extensive use of information from the writings of Eusebius, as well as from Jose- phus and those Roman historians who wrote about this period of time.
    [Show full text]
  • The Expression of Devotion in Forms of Worship
    202 THE EXPRESSION OF DEVOTION THE EXPRESSION OF DEVOTION IN FORMS OF WORSHIP. BY THE REV. ALFRED FAWKES, M.A., Vicar of Ashby St. Ledgers : Chaplain to the Bishop of Durham. r. THE subject of this paper, "The Expression of Devotion in Forms of Worship," is one to which an unnecessary and undesirable prominence has been, and still is, given in the Church of England. The Vestiarian Controversy-a dispute as to the shape, colour and material of the official dress of the clergy­ began early. Hooker described the questions raised by it as being " in truth such silly things that very easiness doth make them hard to be disputed of in serious manner." 1 The times were critical. The Pope and the Jesuits were plotting the assassination of Queen Elizabeth ; the Spanish Armada was thundering up the Channel; the Reformation rocked to its founda­ tions-and the English clergy were distracted over such questions as the respective claims of Bishops and Presbyters; gowns and surplices, round or square caps. The ritual disputes of to-day are no less foolish and mischievous. For now, as then, the times are critical. " The English Church," writes one of the ablest of its Bishops, " has an immense opportunity, which the clergy are throwing away. Our internal dissensions are caused by puerilities which we thought had been discarded for good centuries ago. All our disputes about Reservation and the like are entirely outside the main stream of modern thought, and can only produce irritated contempt in the mind of any educated man who has had a reasonable training in scientific method.
    [Show full text]