Bell Bend COLA, Final Safety Analysis Report, Section 2.5, Pages 2-1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bell Bend COLA, Final Safety Analysis Report, Section 2.5, Pages 2-1 FSAR: Section 2.5 Geology, Seismology, and Geotechnical Engineering 2.5 GEOLOGY, SEISMOLOGY, AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING {This section of the U.S. EPR FSAR is incorporated by reference with the following supplements. The summary includes a synopsis of FSAR Section 2.5.1 through Section 2.5.5, including a brief description of the site, investigations performed, results of investigations, conclusions, and identification of the organization that performed the work. This section is intended to demonstrate compliance with the requirements of paragraph (c) of 10 CFR 100.23, "Geologic and Seismic Siting Criteria" (CFR, 2007a). Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.208, "A Performance-Based Approach to Define the Site-Specific Earthquake Ground Motion", (NRC, 2007a) is the primary guidance document for the development of the site Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis (PSHA) and Ground Motion Response Spectrum (GMRS). The terms site region, site vicinity, site area, and site are used in this section to describe the specific areas of investigation. These terms correspond to the following areas: 1. The site region is that area within 200 miles (322 km) of the site location. 2. The site vicinity is that area within 25 miles (40 km) of the site location. 3. The site area is that area within 5 miles (8 km) of the site location. 4. The site is that area within 0.6 mile (1 km) of the site location. SUMMARY The proposed Bell Bend Nuclear Power Plant (BBNPP) site is located south and west of the existing Susquehanna Steam Electric Station (SSES) in Salem Township, Luzerne County, Pennsylvania. The BBNPP site is found approximately 5 mi (8 km) northeast of the Borough of Berwick, Pennsylvania, and 1.5 mi (2.4 km) to the north and west of the north branch of the Susquehanna River. The major metropolitan centers closest to the site include: Wilkes-Barre, located 19 mi (31 km) to the northeast; Allentown, PA, approximately 50 mi (80 km) to the southeast; and Harrisburg, PA, which is approximately 70 mi (100 km) to the southwest. The BBNPP Owner Controlled Area (OCA) is 882 ac (357 ha). The BBNPP site occupies an area of 424 acres (172 hectares) within the OCA. The BBNPP is not within the Exclusion Area Boundary for SSES Units 1 and 2. For the establishment of the horizontal datum, Pennsylvania State Plane Coordinate System (North Zone), North American Datum of 1983 (NAD 1983) is utilized. For the establishment of the vertical datum, North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88) is utilized, unless stated otherwise. FSAR Section 2.5 provides information on the seismic, geologic, and geotechnical characteristics of the site and the region surrounding the site. The purpose of this information is to permit an adequate evaluation of the proposed site, to support evaluations performed to estimate the site-specific ground motion response spectrum (GMRS), and to permit adequate engineering solutions to actual or potential geologic and seismic hazards at the proposed site. Details of the studies and investigations performed as well as the findings and conclusions are presented in Section 2.5.1 through Section 2.5.5. BBNPP 2-1 Dec 2012 © 2007-2012 UniStar Nuclear Services, LLC. All rights reserved. Supplement COPYRIGHT PROTECTED FSAR: Section 2.5 Geology, Seismology, and Geotechnical Engineering The primary conclusions of Section 2.5 are as follows: 1. Section 2.5.1 Basic Geologic & Seismic Information - The site lies in a stable geologic region, and no geologic or man-made hazards are identified within the site area. The site is located in a region that has experienced only infrequent minor earthquake activity, with only 5 seismic events detected within a 50-mile (80-km) radius of the site.” 2. Section 2.5.2 Vibratory Ground Motion - A PSHA was developed in accordance with Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.208 (NRC, 2007a), using: (1) the EPRI/DOE/NRC (2012) Central and Eastern United States (CEUS) Seismic Source Characterization (SSC) model and (2) the EPRI (2004, 2006a) ground motion model. Based on the PHSA, deaggregation was carried out to identify controlling earthquakes and associated response spectra. The controlling earthquakes were used along with a site geotechnical model to perform site response analysis. The site response was combined with the uniform hazard response spectra (UHRS) from the PSHA according to Approach 2B of NUREG/CR–6728 (McGuire, 2001) to obtain hazard-consistent UHRS at the surface. The surface UHRS were then used to develop a performance based Ground Motion Response Spectra (GMRS) following RG 1.208. 3. Section 2.5.3 Surface Faulting - The site vicinity exhibits little evidence of faulting and all of it is non-capable. In addition, a targeted field investigation for the site vicinity discovered no evidence of paleoliquefaction features. 4. Section 2.5.4 Stability of Subsurface Materials and Foundations - Subsurface investigations concluded that the site analysis was bounded by the U.S. EPR FSAR for settlement, bearing capacity, hydraulic gradient and that the subsurface bedrock materials are stable with no potential for soil liquefaction. The Nuclear Island will be founded on either the Mahantango Formation or concrete fill. 5. Section 2.5.5 Stability of Slopes - The site exhibits limited natural slopes and the only permanent slopes are those for the Essential Service Water Emergency Makeup System (ESWEMS) Retention Pond. All permanent and temporary slopes are shown to have adequate stability safety factors. Additional details are summarized below. Basic Geologic and Seismic Information Regional Geology The BBNPP site lies within the Appalachian Mountain Section of the Ridge and Valley Province that consists of long, narrow ridges and broad to narrow valleys exhibiting moderate to very high relief. These ridges and valleys are a direct result of lithologic disparities in erosional resistance and the folded and faulted structures developed in the geologic past, when the mountains were built, during the Alleghanian Orogeny. This Province is primarily a zone containing Cambrian to Pennsylvanian rocks that were folded and faulted during the Alleghanian Orogeny that occurred during late Pennsylvanian through Permian times, nearly 300 million years ago. In addition to the geologic events that affected the entire Ridge and Valley Physiographic Province, three glacial advances affected the site vicinity during the Pleistocene Epoch. BBNPP 2-2 Dec 2012 © 2007-2012 UniStar Nuclear Services, LLC. All rights reserved. Supplement COPYRIGHT PROTECTED FSAR: Section 2.5 Geology, Seismology, and Geotechnical Engineering The BBNPP site region is located in a stable continental region (SCR) characterized by low rates of crustal deformation with no active plate boundary conditions. Beyond the site region, features or areas with repeated large magnitude (moment magnitude, M, equal to or greater than 6.5) earthquakes (RLMEs) are documented. Those with a potential impact on seismic hazard at the site are included in the PSHA. Site Geology Significant surface and subsurface investigations were conducted for the BBNPP site area foundation investigation, including field surveys, drilling, and geophysical exploration. Additional information was obtained from the SSES FSAR (SSES FSAR, 2003). The site is adjacent to the Susquehanna River near the southern edge of glaciation in Pennsylvania. The BBNPP site area is located within the Susquehanna Lowland Section of the Ridge and Valley Physiographic Province which is bordered by the Anthracite Valley Section to the west and north, the New England Province to the east, and the Piedmont and Blue Ridge Provinces to the south. The site area is underlain by folded Late Silurian, Devonian, and Early Mississippian formations. More specifically, the site bedrock is Upper Devonian Mahantango Formation. The most recent geologic influence on the site is the Wisconinan glaciation that deposited glacial materials (including kame terrace, moraines and outwash) on the bedrock surface in a layer approximately 40 feet thick. The topography within 5 mi (8 km) of the site consists of low to moderately high, linear ridges and valleys that primarily follow structural trends. Local elevations range from about 260 ft (79 m) to nearly 2,368 ft (722 m). The BBNPP is constructed at a final grade elevation of 719 ft (219 m) and is set back approximately 8,000 ft to 10,000 ft (2,438 m to 3,048 m) from the River bank. The local geologic formations were subjected to a series of mountain-building episodes, including the Grenville, Taconic and Alleghanian orogenies. The local structure of the Ridge and Valley Province was imparted to the area during the Alleghanian Orogeny at the end of the Permian Period, nearly 250 million years ago. The site geologic history has been quiet since the end of the Permian. At that time the local portion of the crust became more stable and tensional stresses predominated through the Cretaceous Period. The only disturbance of this quiet state was the advance of several ice sheets in the Pleistocene. However, because the site is located at the extreme southern limit of the glaciated area, the ice sheets were at their thinnest and any crustal depression or subsequent rebound from the ice load has been minimal. Geologic studies to determine the site structural characteristics were performed utilizing data obtained from site borings and geophysical surveys. In addition, bedrock exposures were mapped throughout the site area. A thorough search for faulting and detailed mapping of excavations was also performed. The site occupies a position on the northern limb of the northeast end of the Berwick Anticline. A pair of faults has been mapped near the axis of the anticline, but they are related to the Alleghanian Orogeny, and are not active today. No geologic hazards were identified during either investigation. The site is located in a region that has experienced only infrequent minor earthquake activity, with only 5 seismic events detected within a 50-mile (80 km) radius of the site.
Recommended publications
  • USGS Topographic Maps of California
    USGS Topographic Maps of California: 7.5' (1:24,000) Planimetric Planimetric Map Name Reference Regular Replace Ref Replace Reg County Orthophotoquad DRG Digital Stock No Paper Overlay Aberdeen 1985, 1994 1985 (3), 1994 (3) Fresno, Inyo 1994 TCA3252 Academy 1947, 1964 (pp), 1964, 1947, 1964 (3) 1964 1964 c.1, 2, 3 Fresno 1964 TCA0002 1978 Ackerson Mountain 1990, 1992 1992 (2) Mariposa, Tuolumne 1992 TCA3473 Acolita 1953, 1992, 1998 1953 (3), 1992 (2) Imperial 1992 TCA0004 Acorn Hollow 1985 Tehama 1985 TCA3327 Acton 1959, 1974 (pp), 1974 1959 (3), 1974 (2), 1994 1974 1994 c.2 Los Angeles 1994 TCA0006 (2), 1994, 1995 (2) Adelaida 1948 (pp), 1948, 1978 1948 (3), 1978 1948, 1978 1948 (pp) c.1 San Luis Obispo 1978 TCA0009 (pp), 1978 Adelanto 1956, 1968 (pp), 1968, 1956 (3), 1968 (3), 1980 1968, 1980 San Bernardino 1993 TCA0010 1980 (pp), 1980 (2), (2) 1993 Adin 1990 Lassen, Modoc 1990 TCA3474 Adin Pass 1990, 1993 1993 (2) Modoc 1993 TCA3475 Adobe Mountain 1955, 1968 (pp), 1968 1955 (3), 1968 (2), 1992 1968 Los Angeles, San 1968 TCA0012 Bernardino Aetna Springs 1958 (pp), 1958, 1981 1958 (3), 1981 (2) 1958, 1981 1981 (pp) c.1 Lake, Napa 1992 TCA0013 (pp), 1981, 1992, 1998 Agua Caliente Springs 1959 (pp), 1959, 1997 1959 (2) 1959 San Diego 1959 TCA0014 Agua Dulce 1960 (pp), 1960, 1974, 1960 (3), 1974 (3), 1994 1960 Los Angeles 1994 TCA0015 1988, 1994, 1995 (3) Aguanga 1954, 1971 (pp), 1971, 1954 (2), 1971 (3), 1982 1971 1954 c.2 Riverside, San Diego 1988 TCA0016 1982, 1988, 1997 (3), 1988 Ah Pah Ridge 1983, 1997 1983 Del Norte, Humboldt 1983
    [Show full text]
  • [Pennsylvania County Histories]
    s-fi Q*M,? P 3 nu V IS Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2018 with funding from This project is made possible by a grant from the Institute of Museum and Library Services as administered by the Pennsylvania Department of Education through the Office of Commonwealth Libraries https://archive.org/details/pennsylvaniacoun15unse r * • M /V R K TWAIN’S scRap moK. P*A TENTS: UNITED STATES. GREAT BRITAIN. June 24TH, 1873. May i6th, 1877. May i 8th, 1877. TRADE M ARKS : UNITED STATES. GREAT BRITAIN. Registered No. 5,896. Registered No. 15,979. DIRECTIONS. Use but little moisture, and only on 'the gummed lines. Press the scran on without wetting it. DANIEL SLOTE & COMPANY, NEW YORK. ,vv / BUCKS COUNTY HISTORICAL MONUMENT AT TAYLORSVILLE. From,. The exercises began at 2 o'clock with music | by the Dollngton band. Genera W. W. H. I Davis, of D ylestown. President of tiie so- " 41 ‘ ,oiety, after prayer had been offered by Dev. Alphonse Dare, of Yardlesv introduced G.m- feral Wil iam S. Stryker, of Trenton, who de¬ livered an address, recalling the incidents surrounding Washington's cr issiug of the Date, Delaware and tire battle of Trenton. General Stryker’s Address. General Stryker depicted in a graphic man. ner the horrible suffering of the Continental i troops on lhat. Christinas day, the depression of the people that so little had been accom¬ f WASHINGTON’S CROSSING. plished, and the feasting and revel of the Hessian soldiers at their Trenton encamp¬ ment. He then told of the supper and coun¬ THE PLACE ON THE DELAWARE cil of Washington’s staff oa Ciiflsirms eve, in S imuel Merrick’s house, on the Newtown f MARKED BY IMPOSING MONUMENTS.
    [Show full text]
  • The Journal of Spelean History
    THE JOU RNA L OF SpeJean History OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE AMERICAN SPELEAN HISTORY ASSOCIATION . 1.~~ VOLUME 25, NO.4 OCT. - DEC., 1991 THE JOURNAL OF SPELEAN HISTORY Volume 25, No. 4 Special Issue: Pennsylvania Caves October-December, 1991 THE ASSOCIATION THE JOURNAL The American Spelean History The Association publishes the Association is chartered as a Journal of Spelean History on a non-profit corporation for the quarterly basis. Pertinent articles study, dissemination, and or reprints are welcomed. interpretation of . spelean history Manuscripts should be typed and and related purposes. All persons double-spaced. Submissions of rough who are interested in those goals drafts for preliminary editing is are cordially invited to become encouraged. Illustrations require members. Annual membership is $8. special handling and arrangements Meetings are held in conjunction should be made with the editor in with the annual convention of the advance. Photos and illustrations National Speleological Society and will be returned upon request. sometimes at West Virginia's Old Timers Reunion. FRONT COVER BACK ISSUES A pencil drawing by P. Meissner shows visitors inspecting Crystal Most back issues of the Journal are Cave, Pennsylvania. Date unknown; available. Early issues are but possibly as early as 1872. photocopied. Indexes are also Courtesy of Nevin Hill. available for volumes 1-6 and 13. Send your requests to Fred Grady Officers (address given with officers). All issues of volumes 1-7:2 are President: available on microfiche from Kraus Reprint Company, Route 100, Marion O. Smith Millwood, New York, 10546. PO Box 8276 UT Station Knoxville, TN 37996 Vice President: Official Quarterly Publication of AMERICAN SPELEAN HISTORY ASSOCIATION Cato Holler History Section PO Box 100 National Speleological Society Old Fort, NC 28762 Secretary-Treasurer: Editor for this issue: Fred Grady Dean H.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial and Palustrine Plant Communities of Pennsylvania
    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS unding for this project was provided by the Wild Resource Conservation Fund. Data used in the development of this classification came largely from Pennsylvania Natural Diversity Inventory F partners: The Nature Conservancy, DCNR's Bureau of Forestry, and the Western Pennsylvania Conservancy. Tom Smith's 1991 draft "Natural Ecological Communities of Pennsylvania" provided the foundation upon which this classification was built. This effort owes much to its predecessor. This work relies heavily on the expertise and many years of field experience provided by the following people: Tony Davis, Dan Devlin, Charles Bier, Andra Leimanis, Jeff Wagner, Mark Anderson, Roger Earl Latham. Several of these people provided draft community descriptions, species lists, or environmental descriptions of community types. All of these people have reviewed multiple draft versions of this classification and have given generously of their time, wisdom, and experience. Many thanks to all of the people who reviewed earlier drafts of this classification, and provided suggestions, guidance, technical assistance, and encouragement, including: Ashton Berdine John Kunsman Jim Bissell Julie Lundgren Dave Boyd Kathy McKenna Chad Buhrman Ken Metzler Bureau of Forestry Staff Susan Munch Don Cameron Chris Nowak Dick Croop Greg Podniesinski Roger Dorsey Connie Reightler Greg Edinger Carol Reschke Jenni Farber Ann Rhoads Chris Firestone Rich Ring Ted Grisez Ann Robinson Steve Grund Lesley Sneddon Stevens Heckscher Kim Steiner Robert Hill Susan Stout Steve
    [Show full text]
  • Us Department of the Interior
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Geologic Map of the Hellertown Quadrangle Northampton, Bucks, and Lehigh Counties, Pennsylvania By Avery Ala Drake, Jr. 1 Open-File Report 96-547 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, produce, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. 'Reston, Va. 1996 GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE HELLERTOWN QUADRANGLE, NORTHAMPTON, BUCKS, AND LEHIGH COUNTIES, PENNSYLVANIA By Avery Ala Drake, Jr. Introduction The Hellertown quadrangle, in eastern Pennsylvania, contains the contact between Mesoproterozoic crystalline rocks of the Durham and Reading Hills segment of the Reading Prong, a major external basement massif in the central Appalachians (Drake and others, 1988), and lower Paleozoic rocks of the Lehigh Valley segment of the Great Appalachian Valley and Mesozoic rocks of the Newark basin. These rocks are obscured through much of the quadrangle by glacial deposits of pre-Wisconsinan age. The rocks exposed in this quadrangle have been studied elsewhere in Pennsylvania, and the reader is referred to Buckwalter (1959, 1962), Drake (1969, 1984, in press a), and MacLachlan (1979, 1983) for descriptions of the Mesoproterozoic rocks, to Drake (1965, 1969), MacLachlan (1967, 1979, 1983), and MacLachlan and others (1975) for descriptions of the lower Paleozoic rocks, and Drake and others (1961), MacLachlan (1979), MacLachlan and others (1975) and McLaughlin (in Willard and others (1959) for descriptions of the Mesozoic rocks. Regionally, the quadrangle is within the complex tectonic terrane termed the Taconides by Drake (1980) that was described in detail by Drake and others (1989).
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior Geological Survey Illinois
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Bibliographies and location maps of publications on aeromagnetic and aeroradiometric surveys for the states east of the Mississippi River and north of the Ohio and Potomac Rivers by Patricia L. Hill Open-File Report 91-370-C 1991 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page General Information..................................................... 2 Illinois................................................................ 4 Indiana................................................................. 8 Maine................................................................... 15 Maryland - Delaware..................................................... 22 Massachusetts - Connecticut - Rhode Island.............................. 30 Michigan................................................................ 47 New Jersey.............................................................. 56 New York................................................................ 62 Ohio.................................................................... 70 Pennsylvania............................................................ 73 Vermont - New Hampshire................................................. 83 Wisconsin............................................................... 89 Northeastern Area DOE-NURE.............................................. 96 rev. 3-1-91 GENERAL INFORMATION FOR THE AEROMAGNETIC AND AERORADIOMETRIC
    [Show full text]
  • The Secretary Announced That the Candidates for Fellowship Had Received a Nearly Unanimous Vote of the Ballots Sent, and That Fellows Were Elected As Follows
    532 PROCEEDINGS OF THE SAINT LOUIS MEETING ELECTION OF FELLOWS The Secretary announced that the candidates for fellowship had received a nearly unanimous vote of the ballots sent, and that Fellows were elected as follows: A r t h d r B ib b in s , Ph. B ., Baltimore, Md. Instructor in GeoloGy, Woman’s ColleGe. G il b e r t D e n n is o n H a r r is , Ph. B ., Ithaca, N. Y. Assistant Professor of Paleon­ toloGy and StratiGraphic GeoloGy, Cornell University; GeoloGist in charGe of the GeoloGical Survey of Louisiana. R ic h a r d R. Hice, B. S., Beaver, Pa. Manufacturer of brick and terra-cotta. E r n e s t H o w e , Ph. IX, WashinGton, D. C. Assistant GeoloGist, U. S. GeoloGical Survey. W illis Thomas Lee, Ph. B., M. S., Phoenix, Ariz. Assistant GeoloGist, U. S. GeoloGical Survey. W illiam D iller M atthew , Ph. D ., New York City. Associate Curator in Verte­ brate PaleontoloGy, American Museum of Natural History. T h o m a s L e o n a r d W a l k k r , Ph. D., Toronto, Canada. Professor of MineraloGy and PetroGraphy, University of Toronto. F r e d B o i' g h t o n W e e k s , WashinGton, D. C. Assistant GeoloGist, V. S. GeoloGical Survey. S a m u e l W e id m a n , Ph. D., Madison, Wis. GeoloGist, Wisconsin GeoloGical and Natural History Survey. E d w a r d 0 .
    [Show full text]
  • Cooks Creek Watershed Conservation Plan Bucks County, Pennsylvania
    DURHAM TOWNSHIP ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL Cooks Creek Watershed Monitoring and Planning Program Cooks Creek Watershed Conservation Plan Bucks County, Pennsylvania Funded through a grant from Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Prepared by Durham Township Environmental Advisory Council with the assistance of MJ Environmental Associates and Wheeler Environmental Services March 10, 2002 Durham Township ● 215 Old Furnace Road ● POB 4 ● Durham ● Pennsylvania 18039 ● Phone 610-346-1604 A CASE FOR PROTECTION OF THE COOKS CREEK WATERSHED A recent USGS publication stated, “As the Nation’s concerns over water resources and the environment increase, the importance of considering groundwater and surface water as a single resource has become increasingly evident" (T.C. Winter, USGS -- Water Resources of the United States – Circular 1139). This certainly applies to the existing and future water supply and water quality issues in Pennsylvania. Whether the concern is source-water protection, drought management, wetland preservation, in-stream aquatic habitat, spring-water withdrawals, or total maximum daily loads (TMDL), an understanding of the interactions between groundwater and surface water is needed for resource management. The issues surrounding growth patterns and overall water resources are not limited to municipal boundaries. The Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code enables water resources to be integrated into the overall land use and land management schemes. Individual municipalities within the Cooks Creek area (and elsewhere) have not been able to technically cope with matters that extend beyond their respective jurisdictions. The geographical scope of the Cooks Creek Rivers Conservation Plan must be watershed-wide considering all aspects of water resources including: aquifers, quality and quantity, water supply, wastewater, and stormwater.
    [Show full text]
  • California Quad Search
    NORTHERN CALIFORNIA QUAD SEARCH Brookings Mount Emily Fourth of July Creek Biscuit Hill Buckskin Peak O'Brien Takilma Oregon Caves Grayback Mountain Carberry Creek Squaw Lakes Dutchman Peak Siskiyou Peak Mount Ashland Siskiyou Pass Soda Mountain Parker Mountain Mule Hill Chicken Hills Hamaker Mountain Worden Lost River Merrill Malin Bryant Mountain Langell Valley Brady Butte Antler Point Strawberry Butte Dog Lake Fitzwater Point West Side Crane Creek Crane Mountain Collins Rim May Lake Smith River High Divide High Plateau Mountain Shelly Creek Ridge Broken Rib Mountain Polar Bear Mountain Deadman Point Figurehead Mountain Kangaroo Mountain Dutch Creek Condrey Mountain Buckhorn Bally Cottonwood Peak Hornbrook Iron Gate Reservoir Copco Secret Spring Mountain Sams Neck Dorris Sheepy Lake Lower Klamath Lake Hatfield Tulelake Newell Carr Butte Sagebrush Butte Steele Swamp Weed Valley Beaver Mountain Pease Flat West of Willow Ranch Willow Ranch Mount Bidwell Lake Annie Barrel Springs Crescent City OE W Crescent City Hiouchi Gasquet Hurdygurdy Butte Devils Punchbowl Preston Peak Happy Camp Slater Butte Seiad Valley Hamburg Horse Creek McKinley Mountain Badger Mountain Hawkinsville Bogus Mountain Dewey Gulch Panther Rock MacDoel Sheep Mountain Red Rock Lakes Mount Dome Captain Jacks Stronghold The Panhandle Copic Double Head Mountain Pinnacle Lake Pothole Valley Hager Basin Del Norte South Mountain McGinty Reservoir McGinty Point Sugar Hill Fort Bidwell Larkspur Hills Crooks Meadow Sister Rocks Childs Hill Cant Hook Mountain Ship Mountain Prescott
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Mineral Resources Quakertown-Doylestown District Pennsylvania and New Jersey
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Ray Lyman Wilbur, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY George Otis Smith, Director Bulletin 828 GEOLOGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES OF THE QUAKERTOWN-DOYLESTOWN DISTRICT PENNSYLVANIA AND NEW JERSEY BY F. BASCOM, E. T. WHERRY, G. W. STOSE and A. I. JONAS UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1931 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D. C. - - - - Price 40 cents CONTENTS Page Introduction. _ __ _______________________________________________ 1 Location and general relations of the area. _______________________ 1 General geography and geology of the region _____________________ 1 Appalachian Highlands______-________-________--__________ 1 , Piedmont province____-_-__-________-______--__ ________ 2 Geography _______________________________________________________ 7 Surface features. _ _____________________________________________ 7 Drainage...____-_______--_ ___________________________________ 8 Population, climate, vegetation, and culture____-__-______________ 9 Descriptive geology. _________________ _ __________ _ _____ _ __ _ 11 Stratigraphy ___ __________--________--_-___-__--_---_--_---__ 11 Archean system_____-___________________-_________________ 11 Sedimentary rocks________________________-_____._____ 11 Graphitic gneiss_-_--__----___--_------------_--___ 11 Pre-Cambrian igneous rocks. ______ _________________________ 13 General features_____-____-__--___-----------_--_-__-_ 13 Quartz monzonite. _________________ ^_ _________________ 13 Gabbro. _--__-___-_-__--_--__-____--------_-_---_-_-_
    [Show full text]