DOCSLIB.ORG

Floor Debate May 22, 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Floor Debate May 22, 2019 Transcript Prepared By the Clerk of the Legislature Transcriber's Office Floor Debate May 22, 2019 [] FOLEY: I call to order the eightieth day of the One Hundred Sixth Legislature, First Session. Senators, please record your presence. Roll call. Mr. Clerk, please record. CLERK: I have a quorum present, Mr. President. FOLEY: Thank you, Mr. Clerk. Are there any corrections for the Journal? CLERK: I have no corrections. FOLEY: Thank you, sir. Any messages, reports, or announcements? CLERK: Mr. President, your Committee on Enrollment and Review reports LB397, LB481, LB481A and LB593 to Select File. That's all that I have, Mr. President. FOLEY: Thank you, sir. While the Legislature is in session and capable of transacting business I propose to sign and do hereby sign LR136. (Doctor of the day introduced.) First item is LB657. Mr. Clerk. CLERK: Mr. President, LB657 is on Final Reading. Senator Wayne, I have two amendments, Senator, with notes you wish to withdraw specifically AM1860 and AM1913. Mr. President, Senator Wayne would move to return LB657 to consider AM1941. FOLEY: Senator Wayne, you're recognized to open on your motion. WAYNE: Colleagues-- thank you, Mr. President. The infamous hemp bill is back after a couple negotiations with the AG and a couple of other parties who had some last-minute concerns, so I'm going to explain what this amendment does. It actually closes a hole in-- not this bill, but actually closes a hole in current law. Current law, because we already have a hemp program and because other states have a hemp programs, if somebody gets caught with plant material, particularly under a pound-- I'm going to try to explain this the best that I can --but under a pound, it would be cost prohibited for counties to go out and test this plant material. So the issue was how can counties continue to test, and I'm going to use a 16-year-old with a joint, it will cost 25 to 50 bucks to get the plant material tested. Even if this bill doesn't pass, this issue is here. This is why it's an important amendment because currently, if this bill doesn't pass with this amendment, somebody can say this is hemp they have instead of a joint. If they do that, they 1 Transcript Prepared By the Clerk of the Legislature Transcriber's Office Floor Debate May 22, 2019 have to test it. What happens with testing, it costs $50 and the fine on hemp --or a joint, I mean, is 300 bucks. So it became cost prohibited to prosecute low-level marijuana users. And that's the current situation because other states are passing hemp programs. So what this bill does, does two things. One-- or this amendment does two things. So one, it says if you don't have proper documentation, one, the plant material can be seized by state patrol or any peace officer. Two, if you have plant material and it's not documented, it is a fine up to a $1,000. The reason why that's important because I just explained, if you have a joint, it's $300. This gives prosecutors two options to say, well, instead of testing the joint at 50 bucks, I can just charge you with a misdemeanor underneath this act for not having the proper documentation for the plant material. So this is like a huge loophole that we're closing that really has nothing to do with our bill, but this bill provides a segue for us to create this law to stop low-level users of plant products to deal with it. Second, there was concerns about the capital or the need from a Department of Ag with the $50,000 appropriation. Well, because it had a general impact fund, we had to remove that and what we did is we allowed or we opened up two cash funds for transfers within their department to be able to have the flexibility to monitor and use their inspectors in a way that can monitor hemp. So we have a Noxious Weed Inspector Fund. We opened that up to allow a noxious weed inspector also to be able to inspect hemp to help offset the cost until the hemp program and the collection of their fees is large enough to pay for itself. So it's almost like they are borrowing from cash funds to make sure that this keeps going until the hemp farmers and producers generate enough cash to offset their loan and to pay for it themselves, which we believe can happen in one to two years. So again, this is a simple amendment. This amendment was worked on by the County Attorneys Association and I want to thank Senator Hilgers for being a part of that conversation. This was also with the AG's Office and the Department of Ag to make sure that we close a loophole that we currently have. And again, whether this bill passes or not, that loophole is there because Montana, Kentucky, other people have hemp programs and so if you have-- and essentially from a practical standpoint, a pound or less of marijuana, somebody can argue it's hemp. A kid on the street can say, no, I got this from Kentucky, it's hemp. And our prosecutors have to go back and say, we have to test it. And because of the low-level of an ounce or less, which is a $300 fine, there's a cost prohibited to it. So we're creating a new misdemeanor class for up to $1,000 to close that loophole. And this is a very important amendment because we're going to have to deal with this regardless of whether this bill passes that people who have a pound or less can make that argument and the county prosecutors and state patrol have an expense that they're going to have to deal with that it's cost prohibited for testing, regardless of whether this bill passes or not. So this bill going forward actually closes a loophole and allows the department the flexibility it needs to oversee and make sure the hemp program and our farmers can adequately grow and it can be monitored. And with that, I would ask for a green vote and I'll be here to answer any questions. Thank you. FOLEY: Thank you, Senator Wayne. Debate is now open on Senator Wayne's motion to return the bill to Select File for a specific amendment. Senator Lowe. 2 Transcript Prepared By the Clerk of the Legislature Transcriber's Office Floor Debate May 22, 2019 LOWE: Thank you, Lieutenant Governor. I'm glad we've taken time on this bill because I believe Senator Wayne has come forth and made it better, not that I agree with it. We need to close these loopholes that the federal government has caused us by putting hemp legal in the Farm Act. We're going to find more problems with this bill and with hemp in Nebraska. If we are worried about our children, which we say we are, then we ought to take a look at what's happening before us today and in the past few days. We say we're always worried about the children, but hemp and smoking of hemp, there are no regulations on. It's not tobacco. Our children will be able to smoke hemp and get a slight high. And with that, I'll wait until it returns to Select File to continue my conversation. Thank you, Mr. President. FOLEY: Thank you, Senator Lowe. Senator Erdman. ERDMAN: Thank you, Lieutenant Governor. You know, we've had a lot of discussion about LB757 --LB657, excuse me, and we've talked about hemp production and there's been comments made about this is going to help the farm economy, this is going to save farms, this is going to improve people's incomes. I don't believe that to be the case. And I appreciated Senator Lowe's stick-to-itiveness in his comments and what he's tried to do to keep us on the right path. I'll be keeping track of watching to see exactly how much hemp is growing, and how much economic development this really does, and how many farmers it really helps. What this will do is create a bunch of new farmers. This will create a bunch of farmers who have never grown anything in their life who will grow hemp, if for many other reasons. So this is the wrong way to go. I appreciate that we have tightened it up. That was needed. I appreciate that. But as Calvin Coolidge once said, it is better to kill a bad bill than to pass a good bill and I believe this is not a good bill. Thank you. FOLEY: Thank you, Senator Erdman. Senator Chambers. CHAMBERS: Thank you. Mr. President and members of the Legislature, life for me is like a seamless web, a continuum. We do things along that continuum, but it continues to go. So yesterday is a part of what was. Today is what is. And I want to continue from what happened yesterday, not just with Senator Groene, but other things that were done. The Legislature yesterday reached a new low. So I had indicated that I will play the rest of the session according to the rules, if you want to call what happened by that term, which means I will take time and there are things I'm going to read into the record.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Crime in Grand Island, Nebraska Genevieve Burch University of Nebraska at Omaha
    University of Nebraska at Omaha DigitalCommons@UNO Publications Archives, 1963-2000 Center for Public Affairs Research 4-1982 Crime in Grand Island, Nebraska Genevieve Burch University of Nebraska at Omaha Kathleen Nicolini University of Nebraska at Omaha Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/cparpubarchives Part of the Demography, Population, and Ecology Commons, and the Public Affairs Commons Recommended Citation Burch, Genevieve and Nicolini, Kathleen, "Crime in Grand Island, Nebraska" (1982). Publications Archives, 1963-2000. 155. https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/cparpubarchives/155 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Public Affairs Research at DigitalCommons@UNO. It has been accepted for inclusion in Publications Archives, 1963-2000 by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CRIME IN GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA by Deborah Caulfield Kathleen Nicolini Rebecca S. Fahrlander, Ph.D. Vincent J. Webb, Ph.D. G;~u~ Center for Applied Urban Research University of Nebraska at Omaha April 1982 The UniversitY ol Nebra$ka-An Equal Opportunity/Atfirrnutive Action Educational Institution ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors wish to thank all members of the CAUR staff who con­ tributed to this project. The final report was edited by Marian Meier and typed by Helen Noyes and Joyce Carson. i TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS i LIST OF TABLES . iii LIST OF FIGURES iii INTRODUCTION . 1 DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS 1 CRH1E TRENDS . 2 Grand Island 2 Hall County 5 Nebraska . 8 Summary 8 Comparison of Crime Trends in Other Nebraska Cities 9 JUVENILE DELINQUENCY 12 THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM 15 Grand Island Police Personnel 15 Hall County Sheriff's Department 15 Probation System 15 COURTS .
    [Show full text]
  • 2012-2013 Legislature's Planning Committee
    Nebraska Legislative Planning Database 2012-13 Contents At-a-glance ....................................................................................................................................... 1 Overview ........................................................................................................................................ 13 Agriculture ..................................................................................................................................... 19 Economy ........................................................................................................................................ 37 Education ...................................................................................................................................... 65 Health and Human Services .......................................................................................................... 81 Natural Resources ......................................................................................................................... 97 Public Safety ................................................................................................................................ 113 State and Local Government ....................................................................................................... 125 Telecommunications .................................................................................................................... 145 Transportation ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Proactive and Patient Managing Immigration and Demographic Change in 2 Rural Nebraska Communities
    GETTY SANGOSTI IMAGES/RJ Proactive and Patient Managing Immigration and Demographic Change in 2 Rural Nebraska Communities By Sara McElmurry November 2018 WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.ORG Proactive and Patient Managing Immigration and Demographic Change in 2 Rural Nebraska Communities By Sara McElmurry November 2018 Contents 1 Introduction and summary 3 Old traditions, new demographics 5 Twin trends drive change in rural Nebraska 14 Contemporary successes and challenges 19 A road map for inclusion 23 Conclusion: Looking ahead 24 About the author and acknowledgments 25 Endnotes Introduction and summary Lexington and Madison—rural Nebraska towns of 10,090 and 2,634 residents, respec- tively—are now enjoying the fruits of three decades of demographic transformation that has simultaneously advanced and challenged their communities. The two towns had a combined foreign-born adult population of just 124 in the 1990 census. Today, three decades after the opening of meatpacking plants in both communities, nearly half of Lexington’s adult population was born outside the United States, as was one-third of the adult population of Madison. Newcomers, hailing from all corners of the world, accounted for 100 percent of both towns’ population growth from 1990 to 2016.1 This report looks beyond the numbers to understand how Lexington and Madison— communities selected for study based on their rurality,2 rapid demographic change, and resulting resilience—have adapted to newcomers. Informed by conversations with more than 70 stakeholders in local government, education, faith, business, and nonprofit and civic organizations, along with lifelong residents and newcomers, this report tells the story of change and the successful management of that change in both towns.3 It explores the effectiveness of intentional strategies taken by key institutions, the successes and decentralized efforts of dedicated civic leaders, and the power of unique characteristics innate to small towns.
    [Show full text]
  • Family/Health Valentine, NE, Wednesday, April 21, 2021
    Your Subscription May Be Due! If a red star appears on your address label, your subscription is about to expire. Please turn to page Valentine 2 for subscription rates. MIDLAND NEWS 75¢ Vol. 49 No. 48 14 Pages - 1 Section Valentine, Nebraska 69201 • April 21, 2021 Surprise!?! Photos by Laura Vroman by Laura Vroman A warm up to 50 degrees was fore- Were you surprised Monday, casted for Wednesday on through April 19? A little bit? Not really? the rest of the week. Nebraska’s weather is always full Sunday, April 18, had a high of 70 of surprises. NOAA weather did degrees, and many were out main- forecast from one to three inches of taining their lawns, and yards. The snow - the surprise came with over overnight low of 27 degrees kept the eight inches! moisture as snow instead of rainfall. According to NOAA Weather According to the U.S. Drought and the National Weather Service Monitor, Cherry County is consid- in North Platte, warm ground ered abnormally dry, along with temperatures may keep accumula- surrounding counties to the east tions on roadways short-lived. The and south. Counties west are in the greatest accumulations will occur moderate drought category. North on elevated and grassy surfaces. West South Dakota and most of Two to four inches was forecasted North Dakota are in the Extreme for Monday evening as well, with Drought category. Gov. Ricketts Designates wind gusting up to 30 mph, which Moisture can be good! would make for difficult travel. Nebraska as a Second Amendment Sanctuary State LINCOLN – April 14, 20201, proclamation.
    [Show full text]
  • [LB14 LB30 LB136 LB289 LB603] the Committee on Judiciary Met at 1:30
    Transcript Prepared By the Clerk of the Legislature Transcriber's Office Judiciary Committee March 19, 2015 [LB14 LB30 LB136 LB289 LB603] The Committee on Judiciary met at 1:30 p.m. on Thursday, March 19, 2015, in Room 1113 of the State Capitol, Lincoln, Nebraska, for the purpose of conducting a public hearing on LB14, LB136, LB30, LB603, and LB289. Senators present: Les Seiler, Chairperson; Colby Coash, Vice Chairperson; Ernie Chambers; Laura Ebke; Bob Krist; Adam Morfeld; Patty Pansing Brooks; and Matt Williams. Senators absent: None. SENATOR SEILER: Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to the Judiciary Committee. I'm Les Seiler from Hastings and the Chairman of this committee. On my far right is Matt Williams from Gothenburg; Adam Morfeld will be sitting next to him, from Lincoln; Bob Krist from Omaha; Senator Chambers from Omaha. Our legal counsel today will be Diane Amdor. On my far left is Dr.... SENATOR EBKE: Yeah, I'm here. SENATOR SEILER: Okay, (laugh) Dr. Laura Ebke from Crete. Sitting next to her will be Patty Pansing Brooks from Lincoln; Senator Colby Coash from Lincoln; and clerk Oliver VanDervoort. Our two pages are Drew and Jonathan. They're important to you because they're the ones that take your testifier's slip and your written materials that you're handing out and they will hand them out. So all you have to do is come up to the edge of the table. They'll meet you there, take it from you, and pass it out. When you sit down, pull yourself up to the microphone.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Attorney's Office District of Nebraska 2018 Annual Report
    United States Attorney’s Office 2008 ANNUALDistrict REPORT of Nebraska 2018 Annual Report Joseph P. Kelly United States Attorney Welcome to the District of Nebraska Nebraska, is a state that lies in both the Great Plains and the Midwestern United States. It is the 16th largest state geographically, and became the 37th state to join the Union on March 1, 1867. Its 77,000 square miles encompass 93 counties, and a population more than 1.9 million people. As one of the 26 states with only one federal judicial district, Nebraska boasts a diverse and varied topography, geography, and economy. Nebraska is also unique in having the only state legislature that is a unicameral and non-partisan. Nebraska has more underground water reserves than any other state in the continental U.S. The name Nebraska is from an Oto Indian word that means "flat water" (referring to the Platte River, which means "flat river" in French). The Omaha and surrounding cities make up a population of more than 900,000 which accounts for a large majority of the District’s population. Lincoln, the state’s capital, is home to more than 280,000 residents. Much of the state is rural, with more than 90% of Nebraska’s cities and towns having fewer than 3,000 people. The state has a mixed economic base with substantial agricultural and agri-business sectors, as well as significant manufacturing, technical, and service sectors. More than 93% of Nebraska’s land is in production agriculture with approximately 46,000 farms and ranches. The state is a national leader in production of beef, pork, corn, and soy beans.
    [Show full text]
  • Nebraska Press Association V. Stuart - a Prosecutor's View of Pre- Trial Restraints on the Press
    DePaul Law Review Volume 26 Issue 3 Spring 1977 Article 2 Nebraska Press Association v. Stuart - A Prosecutor's View of Pre- Trial Restraints on the Press Milton R. Larson John P. Murphy Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/law-review Recommended Citation Milton R. Larson & John P. Murphy, Nebraska Press Association v. Stuart - A Prosecutor's View of Pre-Trial Restraints on the Press, 26 DePaul L. Rev. 417 (1977) Available at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/law-review/vol26/iss3/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Law at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in DePaul Law Review by an authorized editor of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NEBRASKA PRESS ASSOCIATION V. STUART- A PROSECUTOR'S VIEW OF PRE-TRIAL RESTRAINTS ON THE PRESS Milton R. Larson* and John P. Murphy** Mr. Larson prosecuted the criminal case which formed the fac- tual setting for the United States Supreme Court decision in Nebraska Press Association v. Stuart. In this article, the authors explain the factors which prompted a pre-trial restrainingorder on publicity. They discuss the alternatives to prior restraints authorized by the Court and explain why they would have been ineffective in this case. Finally, they contend that the Stuart decision effectively eliminates all "gags" on the press, at least in coverage of criminal proceedings. Confusion has plagued the legal community and the media in recent years concerning the protection to be accorded conflicting constitutional rights arising in criminal jury trials which stimu- late unusual public interest and extensive media coverage.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Attorney's Office District of Nebraska 2016 Annual Report
    United States Attorney’s Office 2008 ANNUALDistrict REPORT of Nebraska 2016 Annual Report Deborah R. Gilg United States Attorney Table of Contents United States Attorney’s Office 1 Message from the United States Attorney 3 Contact Information 7 Strategic Goals 8 Mission Statement 9 Welcome to the District of Nebraska 10 Criminal Division 12 Anti-Terrorism 13 Project Safe Neighborhoods 14 Project Safe Childhood 19 Other Criminal Division Priorities 22 Narcotics Enforcement 27 Asset Forfeiture 30 HIDTA 31 Civil Division 35 Civil Litigation and Judgement Collections 36 Law Enforcement & Community Coordination 43 Victim Services 45 2016 LECC Awards 46 Websites of Interest 54 United States Attorney’s Office District of Nebraska The United States Attorney serves as the chief federal law enforcement officer in the District of Nebraska, and is responsible for coordinating multiple agency investigations within the District. The United States Attorney and her Assistants represent the federal government in virtually all litigation involving the United States in the District of Nebraska, including all criminal prosecutions for violations of federal law, civil lawsuits in which the United States is a party, and actions to collect judgments and restitution on behalf of victims and taxpayers. Deborah R. Gilg was sworn in as the 32nd United States Attorney for the District of Nebraska on October 1, 2009. She is the first female United States Attorney for the District of Nebraska and a native of Omaha. During 2016, she served on U.S Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s Advisory Committee (AGAC). She also serves on Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s Subcommittees on National Security and Terrorism, Civil Rights Enforcement, Native American Issues and Cyber/Intellectual Property Issues.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Primary Nebraska
    2020 Primary Nebraska www.Vote411.org League of Women Voters of Nebraska Email: [email protected] Table of Contents for 2020 Primary Races in Nebraska Nebraska Voters Urged to Vote by Mail Covid-19 Alert Primary 2020 Notes Federal Races (Nebraska) U.S. Senator U.S House of Representatives, District 1 U.S House of Representatives, District 2 U.S House of Representatives, District 3 Nebraska State Races State Legislature, District 1 State Legislature, District 3 State Legislature, District 15 State Legislature, District 17 State Legislature, District 21 State Legislature, District 23 State Legislature, District 25 State Legislature, District 27 State Legislature, District 29 State Legislature, District 35 State Legislature, District 37 State Legislature, District 43 State Legislature, District 45 State Legislature, District 49 Nebraska District Races Nebraska Public Power District, District 7 Natural Resource District: Lower Big Blue, District 1 Natural Resource District: Lower Platte South, District 4 Natural Resource District: Lower Platte South, District 10 Natural Resource District: Upper Big Blue, District 5 State Board of Education, District 3 Board of Governors Southeast Community College - At Large Mayoral Races City of Fremont City of Gibbon City of Henderson City Council Races City of Alliance, City Council City of Battle Creek, City Council City of Bellevue, City Council, At Large City of Crofton, City Council, At Large City of David City, City Council, First Ward City of Fremont, City Council, First Ward City
    [Show full text]
  • 2019-Issue-1 Compressed.Pdf
    Volume 89. Issue No. 2 Fall-Winter 2018 The NebraskaSheriff A Publication of the Nebraska Sheriff s’ Association INI THIS ISSUE: Passing of TheT Death of Proactive Policing the NSA WillW Lead Americans to More President’s GravesitesG PAGE 7 Gavel | Pg. 3 RapidR DNA PAGE 12 DomesticD & Sexual Violence Response in Nebraska PAGE 16 Go get the bad guys! PAGE 18 Legislative Update PAGE 22 July Tri-State Training PAGE 26 Misdemeanor Crimes of DomesticD Violence PAGE 30 2018 NSA/POAN Conference NEBRASKA SHERIFFS’ ASSOCIATION HALL OF FAME AWARD Photos Douglas County Sheriff , Tim Dunning, was elected in 1994 after defeating 16-year incumbent Richard Roth and is now the longest running Sheriff in Douglas County history PAGE 24-25 having served 24 years as Douglas County Sheriff ....None of the many improvements and accomplishments at the DCSO would have been possible without the support and leadership of Sheriff Dunning; he is truly on the cutting edge of law enforcement. I am proud and honored to nominate Sheriff Timothy F. Dunning for induction into the Nebraska Sheriff s’ Association – Hall of Fame. Full story on pages 10-11. ANCMS Milford, NE 68405 NE Milford, PAID 521 First St. First 521 US POSTAGE US s Association s ff Sheri NE PRSRT STD PRSRT Fall/Winter Issue 2018 | The NebraskaSheriff More on the 2019 NBA award recipients on pages 10-11 and 14-15. 1 2 The NebraskaSheriff | Fall/Winter Issue 2018 Nebraska Department of Transportation Highway Safety Office Fall/Winter Issue 2018 | The NebraskaSheriff 3 THE NEBRASKA SHERIFF MAGAZINE POLICIES Only submitted articles pertinent to criminal justice, law enforcement, and NSA members will be featured.
    [Show full text]
  • Gang Legislation: a Solution to Nebraska’S Gang Problem
    Preventing and Suppressing Gang Crimes through Comprehensive Anti- Gang Legislation: A Solution to Nebraska’s Gang Problem Table of Contents I. Introduction……………………………………………………………………...4 II. Know Thy Enemy……………………………………………………………….6 A. Defining “Gang”………………………………………………………...7 B. Gang Formation and Recruitment……………………………………...11 1. Utilitarian Perspective……………………………………………12 2. Social Problems Perspective……………………………………..13 3. Institution Perspective……………………………………………13 4. Ethnic Self-Protection Perspective………………………………14 5. Surrogate Family Perspective……………………………………14 C. The Gravity of Gang Crimes…………………………………………...15 D. Selected National Gangs……………………………………………….18 1. The Bloods and Crips…………………………………………….18 2. The 18th Street Gang…………………………………………….21 3. Mara Salvatrucha (MS-13)………………………………………23 E. International Gang Phenomenon……………………………………….25 F. Nebraska’s Gang Problem……………………………………………...29 III. States’ Legislative Response………………………………………………….33 A. California……………………………………………………………….33 B. States Surrounding Nebraska…………………………………………..35 1. Colorado………………………………………………………….36 2. Iowa………………………………………………………………36 3. Kansas……………………………………………………………37 4. Missouri………………………………………………………….38 5. South Dakota……………………………………………………..39 6. Wyoming…………………………………………………………40 C. Nebraska………………………………………………………………. .40 IV. Nebraska Should Enact Comprehensive Anti-Gang Legislation………………………………………………………………………...42 A. Rationale………………………………………………………………..43 1. To Attack the Organized Nature of Criminal Street Gangs……...43 2. To Reflect the Gravity of Gang Crime in Nebraska’s
    [Show full text]
  • Floor Debate March 16, 2016
    Transcript Prepared By the Clerk of the Legislature Transcriber's Office Floor Debate March 16, 2016 [LB31 LB235 LB289 LB439 LB467A LB467 LB516 LB643 LB680A LB698 LB698A LB716 LB722A LB744 LB745 LB754A LB754 LB783A LB824 LB843 LB867 LB869 LB883 LB894 LB900 LB956 LB957 LB960 LB960A LB977 LB977A LB981 LB1012 LB1038A LB1081 LB1093 LB1097 LR470 LR471 LR472 LR473 LR474 LR485 LR486 LR487 LR488 LR489 LR490 LR491] SENATOR WATERMEIER PRESIDING SENATOR WATERMEIER: GOOD MORNING, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN. WELCOME TO THE GEORGE W. NORRIS LEGISLATIVE CHAMBER FOR THE FORTY-THIRD DAY OF THE ONE HUNDRED FOURTH LEGISLATURE, SECOND SESSION. OUR CHAPLAIN FOR TODAY IS SENATOR JIM SCHEER. PLEASE RISE. SENATOR SCHEER: (PRAYER OFFERED.) SENATOR WATERMEIER: THANK YOU, SENATOR SCHEER. I CALL TO ORDER THE FORTY-THIRD DAY OF THE ONE HUNDRED FOURTH LEGISLATURE, SECOND SESSION. SENATORS, PLEASE RECORD YOUR PRESENCE. ROLL CALL. MR. CLERK, PLEASE RECORD. CLERK: I HAVE A QUORUM PRESENT, MR. PRESIDENT. SENATOR WATERMEIER: THANK YOU, MR. CLERK. ARE THERE ANY CORRECTIONS FOR THE JOURNAL? CLERK: I HAVE NONE, MR. PRESIDENT. SENATOR WATERMEIER: ARE THERE MESSAGES, REPORTS, OR ANNOUNCEMENTS? CLERK: MR. PRESIDENT, I HAVE NEITHER MESSAGES, REPORTS, NOR ANNOUNCEMENTS AT THIS TIME. SENATOR WATERMEIER: THE CHAIR WOULD LIKE TO RECOGNIZE SPEAKER HADLEY. 1 Transcript Prepared By the Clerk of the Legislature Transcriber's Office Floor Debate March 16, 2016 SPEAKER HADLEY: GOOD MORNING, MR. PRESIDENT; GOOD MORNING, COLLEAGUES. TODAY WE WILL WORK ON THE GENERAL FILE THAT'S ON THE AGENDA. DEPENDING ON WHAT WE GET DONE TODAY WILL DETERMINE WHAT WE DO TOMORROW. THIS IS A FLOATING TYPE OF CONCEPT WHAT THE AGENDA IS GOING TO BE.
    [Show full text]