Etaf Annual Report 2019 Index

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Etaf Annual Report 2019 Index ETAF ANNUAL REPORT 2019 INDEX 02 FOREWORD 08 The Directive on Administrative Cooperation 09 What could make digital taxation more efficient? 10 ETAF’s engagement in the VAT Expert Group 03 PROFESSIONAL LAW 03 ETAF rejects general suspicion against tax advisers 04 Commission consults ETAF on Internal Market Policy 11 EVENTS 11 “Future Trends of Taxation” - Conference 12 “Future dynamics of EU tax policy” - Conference 05 TAX LAW 13 ETAF Board renewed 05 Qualified majority voting in tax matters 14 Our “DNA” – what is at stake? 06 How to strengthen the European Commission’s communication tools 15 ETAF ACTIVITIES 2019 07 ETAF feedbacks on forms standardization for dispute resolution and administrative cooperation Philippe Arraou, President of ETAF 1 ETAF ANNUAL REPORT 2019 Foreword of the President FOREWORD Dear ETAF Members, Dear friends, Tax policy has become an essential part of the political versations on how to shape future policies and how to agenda of decision-makers at EU-level and is covering strengthen the profession. the front pages of newspapers around Europe. It is no longer treated as a side issue and almost every political 2019 was a busy and yet productive year. In March we group in the European Parliament has made tax a priority invited decision-makers and representatives of various in their programmes and committed itself to work towards stakeholders to discuss future trends of taxation and the tax transparency goals during the mandate of 2019-2024. possible implications of qualified majority voting in tax matters and what European tax policy would look like af- With the impact of climate change on our economies, ter Brexit. the call for more sustainable and green economic sys- tems intensified. The idea of using tax as a powerful In December we held another conference on how the dif- tool to help reach climate neutrality is gaining more and ferent EU institutions influence each other and especially more ground. As the European Commission is determi- how the OECD comes into play in European tax policy. ned to raise the EU’s climate ambition and get all Mem- The rapid development of technology and the increasing ber States on board to reach climate-neutrality as early digitalization of our economies has led the OECD to work as 2050 this will most certainly shape our future tax sys- on a plan on how to fairly tax digital activities. This is tems. certainly one area where we can observe a significant in- fluence of the OECD on tax matters in Europe. Our profession has a crucial role to play. As intermediaries between tax authorities and the businesses we contribute The digitalization and growth of technology has already to the tax collecting process and make sure our clients a clear impact on the way we carry out our work, surely comply with existing tax rules. Following the EU’s sustai- influencing our interaction with clients and tax adminis- nability agenda, tax professionals will become even more trations. This topic has kept us busy in 2019 and will instrumental: we advise our clients in the economy and ex- continue to do so in 2020. ETAF will closely observe all plain complex tax rules thus raising acceptance for taxes. new developments in this regard and will remain on the forefront of all discussions to make sure our profession’s It is therefore of utmost importance that we maintain concerns are heard. ETAF’s job is to act in the interest of high professional standards to be able to provide highly all tax professionals, and in the public interest, as well. qualified tax advice. In the past year, part of our work was to ensure a high visibility of tax advisers and gua- I hope you will enjoy reading our Annual Report 2019! rantee that our concerns were heard on EU-level. We met various decision-makers in the European institu- Yours sincerely, tions and had numerous fruitful and constructive con- Philippe Arraou 2 ETAF ANNUAL REPORT 2019 Professional Law PROFESSIONAL LAW ETAF rejects general suspicion against tax advisers Philippe Arraou President of ETAF, Marek Belka (Member of the European Parliament, S&D, Poland), Maria Teresa Fabregas Fernandez (Director Indirect Taxation and Tax Administration at DG TAXUD, European Commission) In March 2019, our profession had to endure some very We pointed out, harsh attacks coming from the Special Committee on Fi- however, that tax nancial Crimes, Tax Evasion and Tax Avoidance (TAX3) of advisers are also the European Parliament. The MEPs drafted a report that committed to act included recommendations for the European Commis- in the public inte- sion on how to tackle money laundering, tax evasion and rest. tax avoidance. The TAX3 report mentioned among other Due to this dual things that intermediaries played a crucial role in facilita- function, tax ad- ting money laundering and the financing of terrorism. It visers have an im- also implied that professional secrecy was being used by portant role in the intermediaries for the purpose of protecting or covering tax collection pro- up illegal practices. cess and contri- Michael Korth (DStV and ETAF Board Member) bute significant- at the ETAF Conference We strongly rejected this general suspicion under which ly to the safeguar- our profession was put in that report and argued for safe- ding of fiscal revenues in Europe. The tax authorities de- guarding the professional secrecy which is a ground pillar pend on tax declarations to be correctly and fully com- of our work and ensures a high quality in our tax advice. pleted. This task in its well-proven quality can only be ETAF represents tax professionals that are regulated and guaranteed by tax advisers, since only tax advisers have therefore already subject to limits in the use of the profes- the legal obligation to perform conscientiously and in full sional secrecy principle. compliance. Tax evasion is highly damaging to the common good and Therefore – and quite contrary to the report – tax advisers must therefore be fought with full power. ETAF supports help to ensure that small and medium-sized enterprises any reasonable and targeted measures to do this. (SMEs) duly pay their fair share of taxes. 3 ETAF ANNUAL REPORT 2019 Professional Law Commission consults ETAF on Internal Market Policy Volker Kaiser (BStBK and ETAF Board Member) at the ETAF Conference the necessary conditions are fulfilled. Concerning the arguments of the Commis- sion on the generation of growth, ETAF pointed out that the Member States with a relatively high degree of regulation do not neces- sarily belong to the “low The European Commission’s Directorate-General for In- performers” in the EU. Rather the opposite is the case ternal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs (DG if we look at France, Germany, Belgium, Austria and Italy, GROW) launched a new bottom-up approach, engaging for example. This fact should be taken into account when in an in-depth and inclusive debate with the Member developing future internal market policies. Moreover, States and various stakeholders. In an effort to gather ETAF pointed out that the existing regulatory require- insights on reforming and defining future internal market ments of the Services Directive and the Professional policies, especially regarding the Services Market, the Qualifications Directive have been fully implemented in Directorate General held intensive exchange of views. the ETAF Member States. On 9 September 2019, ETAF was invited by the European Commission to join a meeting in this regard and discuss Complementarily, ETAF explained the role of the profes- current market policies, concerns of the profession and sion, the advantages it brings to our societies, namely by how to improve the Internal Market for Services. securing tax revenues, and how professional regulations can make a worthy contribution in the fight against tax ETAF welcomes this new approach as it will result in evasion. more targeted and effective policies and lead to a broa- der acceptance of EU-legislation. During the meeting, Asked about a “key-message” to the new Commissio- ETAF highlighted that the services market in the EU is ner, ETAF asked to respect the principle of subsidiarity in principle open. Anyone can access to the profession and, especially when it comes to Services, to follow the of a tax adviser, an expert-comptable or a dottore com- strategy of “Unity in Diversity” – as the European Union mercialista in the respective Member State as long as generally is. 4 ETAF ANNUAL REPORT 2019 Tax Law TAX LAW TAX LAW Qualified majority voting in tax matters – what is at stake? used. Tax policy is in fact one of the last remaining political areas where unanimity is obligatory. On this basis, the arguments of the Commission should not be entirely dismissed: the unanimity principle stems from a time when the Union was smaller and unanimity therefore easier to achieve. In particular, in today’s EU, the progress in tax policy is sometimes hampered by the unanimity requirement which makes it often difficult for the Union to keep pace with rapid economic, societal and technological developments. In its feedback to the con- sultation, ETAF highlighted that qualified majority voting could help advancing tax proposals such as the Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base and reduce the influ- ence of certain Member States that are blocking reforms in European tax policy. At the same time however, ETAF pointed out that the ob- Speaker Patrice Pillet (Head of Unit Indirect Taxation at DG TAXUD, European Commission) jections raised by several national governments – name- ly the concern of losing fiscal sovereignty rights – shall neither be ignored. The national power of choosing tax strategies which meet the specific economic reality and On 20 December 2018, the European Commission pu- the needs of that Member State should be a valid reason blished a Roadmap to explore how EU decision-making and thus taken seriously and carefully into consideration.
Recommended publications
  • European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast
    Briefing May 2019 European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast Austria – 18 MEPs Staff lead: Nick Dornheim PARTIES (EP group) Freedom Party of Austria The Greens – The Green Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) (EPP) Social Democratic Party of Austria NEOS – The New (FPÖ) (Salvini’s Alliance) – Alternative (Greens/EFA) – 6 seats (SPÖ) (S&D) - 5 seats Austria (ALDE) 1 seat 5 seats 1 seat 1. Othmar Karas* Andreas Schieder Harald Vilimsky* Werner Kogler Claudia Gamon 2. Karoline Edtstadler Evelyn Regner* Georg Mayer* Sarah Wiener Karin Feldinger 3. Angelika Winzig Günther Sidl Petra Steger Monika Vana* Stefan Windberger 4. Simone Schmiedtbauer Bettina Vollath Roman Haider Thomas Waitz* Stefan Zotti 5. Lukas Mandl* Hannes Heide Vesna Schuster Olga Voglauer Nini Tsiklauri 6. Wolfram Pirchner Julia Elisabeth Herr Elisabeth Dieringer-Granza Thomas Schobesberger Johannes Margreiter 7. Christian Sagartz Christian Alexander Dax Josef Graf Teresa Reiter 8. Barbara Thaler Stefanie Mösl Maximilian Kurz Isak Schneider 9. Christian Zoll Luca Peter Marco Kaiser Andrea Kerbleder Peter Berry 10. Claudia Wolf-Schöffmann Theresa Muigg Karin Berger Julia Reichenhauser NB 1: Only the parties reaching the 4% electoral threshold are mentioned in the table. Likely to be elected Unlikely to be elected or *: Incumbent Member of the NB 2: 18 seats are allocated to Austria, same as in the previous election. and/or take seat to take seat, if elected European Parliament ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• www.eurocommerce.eu Belgium – 21 MEPs Staff lead: Stefania Moise PARTIES (EP group) DUTCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY FRENCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY GERMAN SPEAKING CONSTITUENCY 1. Geert Bourgeois 1. Paul Magnette 1. Pascal Arimont* 2. Assita Kanko 2. Maria Arena* 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Supported Amendments
    Amendment 135 Petra Kammerevert, Victor Negrescu, Jens Geier, Ibán García Del Blanco, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Marcos Ros Sempere, Hannes Heide, Łukasz Kohut, Massimiliano Smeriglio, Predrag Fred Matić, Lara Wolters, Vilija Blinkevičiūtė, Niklas Nienaß, Martina Michels Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (4) The outbreak of the COVID-19 (4) The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in early 2020 changed the pandemic in early 2020 changed the economic outlook for the years to come in economic outlook for the years to come in the Union and in the world, calling for an the Union and in the world, calling for an urgent and coordinated response from the urgent and coordinated response from the Union in order to cope with the enormous Union in order to cope with the enormous economic and social consequences for all economic and social consequences for all Member. The challenges linked to the Member. The challenges linked to the demographic context have been amplified demographic context, social inclusion and by COVID-19. The current COVID-19 social cohesion have been amplified by pandemic as well as the previous COVID-19. The current COVID-19 economic and financial crisis have shown pandemic as well as the previous that developing sound and resilient economic and financial crisis have shown economies and financial systems built on that developing sound and resilient strong economic and social structures economies and financial systems built on helps Member States to respond more strong economic and social structures efficiently to shocks and recover more helps Member States to respond more swiftly from them.
    [Show full text]
  • How Poland's EU Membership Helped Transform Its Economy Occasional
    How Poland’s EU Membership Helped Transform its Economy Marek Belka Occasional Paper 88 Group of Thirty, Washington, D.C. About the Author Marek Belka is the President of the National Bank of Poland. After completing economic studies at the University of Łódź in 1972, Professor Belka worked in the university’s Institute of Economics. He earned a PhD in 1978 and a postdoctoral degree in economics in 1986. Since 1986, he has been associated with the Polish Academy of Sciences. During 1978–79 and 1985–86, he was a research fellow at Columbia University and the University of Chicago, respectively, and in 1990, at the London School of Economics. He received the title of Professor of Economics in 1994. Since the 1990s, Professor Belka has held important public positions both in Poland and abroad. In 1990, he became consultant and adviser at Poland’s Ministry of Finance, then at the Ministry of Ownership Transformations and the Central Planning Office. In 1996, he became consultant to the World Bank. During 1994–96, he was Vice-Chairman of the Council of Socio-Economic Strategy at Poland’s Council of Ministers, and later economic adviser to the President of the Republic of Poland. Professor Belka served as Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance on two occasions—in 1997, in the government of Włodzimierz Cimoszewicz, and during 2001–02, in the government of Leszek Miller. During 2004–05, he was Prime Minister of Poland. Since 2006, Professor Belka has been Executive Secretary of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, and since January 2009, he has been Director of the European Department at the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
    [Show full text]
  • Question for Written Answer
    Question for written answer E-002367/2021 to the Commission Rule 138 Łukasz Kohut (S&D), Terry Reintke (Verts/ALE), Cyrus Engerer (S&D), Leszek Miller (S&D), Manuel Pizarro (S&D), Olivier Chastel (Renew), Radka Maxová (S&D), Niklas Nienaß (Verts/ALE), Petar Vitanov (S&D), Andrzej Halicki (PPE), Gwendoline Delbos-Corfield (Verts/ALE), Ernest Urtasun (Verts/ALE), Robert Biedroń (S&D), Daniel Freund (Verts/ALE), Sylwia Spurek (Verts/ALE), Evelyne Gebhardt (S&D), Monika Vana (Verts/ALE), Lara Wolters (S&D), Vera Tax (S&D), Aurore Lalucq (S&D), Dimitrios Papadimoulis (The Left), Maria Grapini (S&D), Klemen Grošelj (Renew), Alexandra Geese (Verts/ALE), Sven Giegold (Verts/ALE), Magdalena Adamowicz (PPE), Marek Belka (S&D), Moritz Körner (Renew), Karen Melchior (Renew), Anna Júlia Donáth (Renew), Tineke Strik (Verts/ALE) Subject: Ensuring the availability of EU funding for final recipients – Regulation No 2020/2092 on a general regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget The Rule of Law Conditionality Regulation1 entered into force on 1 January 2021. Recital 19 of the Regulation states that: ‘It is essential that the legitimate interests of final recipients and beneficiaries are properly safeguarded when measures are adopted in the event of breaches of the principles of the rule of law ...Taking into consideration that in shared management payments from the Commission to Member States are legally independent from payments by national authorities to beneficiaries, appropriate measures under this Regulation should not be considered to affect the availability of funding for payments towards beneficiaries ...’ Further, pursuant to Article 5(5) of the Regulation: ‘on the basis of the information provided by the final recipients or beneficiaries ..
    [Show full text]
  • A Look at the New European Parliament Page 1 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMITTEE (INTA)
    THE NEW EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT KEY COMMITTEE COMPOSITION 31 JULY 2019 INTRODUCTION After several marathon sessions, the European Council agreed on the line-up for the EU “top jobs” on 2 July 2019. The deal, which notably saw German Defence Minister Ursula von der Leyen (CDU, EPP) surprisingly designated as the next European Commission (EC) President, meant that the European Parliament (EP) could proceed with the election of its own leadership on 3 July. The EPP and Renew Europe (formerly ALDE) groups, in line with the agreement, did not present candidates for the EP President. As such, the vote pitted the S&D’s David-Maria Sassoli (IT) against two former Spitzenkandidaten – Ska Keller (DE) of the Greens and Jan Zahradil (CZ) of the ACRE/ECR, alongside placeholder candidate Sira Rego (ES) of GUE. Sassoli was elected President for the first half of the 2019 – 2024 mandate, while the EPP (presumably EPP Spitzenkandidat Manfred Weber) would take the reins from January 2022. The vote was largely seen as a formality and a demonstration of the three largest Groups’ capacity to govern. However, Zahradil received almost 100 votes (more than the total votes of the ECR group), and Keller received almost twice as many votes as there are Greens/EFA MEPs. This forced a second round in which Sassoli was narrowly elected with just 11 more than the necessary simple majority. Close to 12% of MEPs did not cast a ballot. MEPs also elected 14 Vice-Presidents (VPs): Mairead McGuinness (EPP, IE), Pedro Silva Pereira (S&D, PT), Rainer Wieland (EPP, DE), Katarina Barley (S&D, DE), Othmar Karas (EPP, AT), Ewa Kopacz (EPP, PL), Klara Dobrev (S&D, HU), Dita Charanzová (RE, CZ), Nicola Beer (RE, DE), Lívia Járóka (EPP, HU) and Heidi Hautala (Greens/EFA, FI) were elected in the first ballot, while Marcel Kolaja (Greens/EFA, CZ), Dimitrios Papadimoulis (GUE/NGL, EL) and Fabio Massimo Castaldo (NI, IT) needed the second round.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia Social Protection During Transition
    ReportNo. 11748-RU Russia Social Protection During Transition r and Beyond Public Disclosure Authorized (in two volumes) VolumeIt: Annexes February2, 1994 Human ResourcesDivision CountryDepartments Ill Europeand Central Asia Region FOR OFFICIALUSE ONLY Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Documentof theWorld Bank Public Disclosure Authorized Thisdocument has a restricteddistribution and may be used by recipients only in theperformance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosedwithout World Bank authorization FOROMCIAL USE ONLY RUSSIA: SOCIAL PROTECTIONDURING TRANSITION AND BEYOND Volume II Annex 1 Tables and graphs 1 Annex Z Wage and EmploymentDecisions in the Russian Economy An Analysis of Developmentsin 1992 13 Annex 3 The Role of Women in Rebuilding the Economy 76 Annex 4 Housing and Labor Market Distortionsin Russia 131 | This document has a restricted distributionand may beused by recipientsonly in th performance of their oMcal duties Its contents may not otherwise be disclosedwithout World Bankauthorization. .tmx 1 MacroeconomICTrends arel Figrs IB 70a - m-h 0114 onl SIll 0961 914 Quarter Vigur* Al 1 -J g.1~1011.10 ConsumerPrice Trmend Quarer F,re, 1 2 , 150goo 4t ) *V4 OV~~~0414 Quarter Figure *1.2 :1 Benefitsas a ftrcentage of GDP1992 . II £.3~~~~~44 4~~~~~~~~ Ilk"-AL1: R1ssian Federation: Distribution of Penioners as of Jamazy 1, 1993 (thousands) Cateory Labor p nioners 34,109 Old-age 28.538 Disability. 3.275 survivor 2,204 Social pensioners 961 Ivalids frau childhood 470 Disabillty pnsioners 60 Men above 65 and werno above 60 330 Childre u&o have lost a breadwinnr 20 Mlitary pensios 1160 Disability peioiner 140 Disability pensioners-war invalds s0 Survivor pnsiones 420 TOTAL 35,469 Ratio of pensioners to wozkforce .49 Source: Minitry of SociaL Protection,Pensios Fund.
    [Show full text]
  • Marek Belka Speaker Profile
    Marek Belka Former Prime Minister (2004 - 2005) & President of the National Bank of Poland (2010 - 2015) CSA CELEBRITY SPEAKERS Marek Belka is one of the most renowned economists and European politicians. As a former Prime Minister and Finance Minister, he has been actively involved in shaping Polish and international economic policy. In addition to his role in Poland's politics, he held numerous high-ranking positions at the United Nations and World Bank and until 2015 he was President of the National Bank of Poland. He is currently Professor of Economics. "A respected voice on European & Global Economics" In detail Languages Prof. Balka was Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance in Professor Belka presents in Polish and English. 1997 and again in 2001. In 2003 he was Chairman of the Council for International Coordination for Iraq and Director of Economic Want to know more? Policy. From May 2004 to October 2005 he was Prime Minister of Give us a call or send us an e-mail to find out exactly what he Poland and from 2006 to 2008 he was Executive Secretary at the could bring to your event. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe in Geneva. Before heading the National Bank of Poland in 2010, he served How to book him? as the International Monetary Fund's European Department Simply phone or e-mail us. Director. In 2013 he was Chair of the Board of Governors at the European Bank for Reconstruction & Development and Member of the Central Bank Governance Group at the Bank for Settlements. What he offers you Professor Belka uses his considerable knowledge of the global and European economic landscape to provide essential information and insights to enable decision makers to plan strategically and gain the all- important competitive advantage.
    [Show full text]
  • Uef-Spinelli Group
    UEF-SPINELLI GROUP MANIFESTO 9 MAY 2021 At watershed moments in history, communities need to adapt their institutions to avoid sliding into irreversible decline, thus equipping themselves to govern new circumstances. After the end of the Cold War the European Union, with the creation of the monetary Union, took a first crucial step towards adapting its institutions; but it was unable to agree on a true fiscal and social policy for the Euro. Later, the Lisbon Treaty strengthened the legislative role of the European Parliament, but again failed to create a strong economic and political union in order to complete the Euro. Resulting from that, the EU was not equipped to react effectively to the first major challenges and crises of the XXI century: the financial crash of 2008, the migration flows of 2015- 2016, the rise of national populism, and the 2016 Brexit referendum. This failure also resulted in a strengthening of the role of national governments — as shown, for example, by the current excessive concentration of power within the European Council, whose actions are blocked by opposing national vetoes —, and in the EU’s chronic inability to develop a common foreign policy capable of promoting Europe’s common strategic interests. Now, however, the tune has changed. In the face of an unprecedented public health crisis and the corresponding collapse of its economies, Europe has reacted with unity and resolve, indicating the way forward for the future of European integration: it laid the foundations by starting with an unprecedented common vaccination strategy, for a “Europe of Health”, and unveiled a recovery plan which will be financed by shared borrowing and repaid by revenue from new EU taxes levied on the digital and financial giants and on polluting industries.
    [Show full text]
  • Volodymyr Zelensky President Ukraine CC
    Volodymyr Zelensky President Ukraine CC: Federica Mogherini High Representative of the Union Brussels, 04 september 2019 Dear President, It has come to our attention that the Russian Federation has requested that Mr Vladimir Borisovich Tsemakh be handed over as part of a prisoner exchange negotiated between the Russian Federation and Ukraine. Mr Tsemakh is a former commander of pro-Russian air defence forces in the non-government controlled territory of the so-called "Donetsk People's Republic" and is a key suspect in the tragedy of passenger flight MH17, shot down in eastern Ukraine on 17 July 2014 by a Russian BUK missile. All 298 people on board, including 196 Dutch, were killed. While we understand the context within which such negotiations are taking place and the diplomatic efforts by the Ukrainian authorities to this end, Mr Tsemakh is a suspect in the criminal investigation related to the downing of flight MH17 and his availability and testimony before the Joint Investigation Team is thus of the utmost importance for an effective prosecution by the countries involved. Mr Tsemakh is a Ukrainian citizen and is under Ukrainian custody. UNSC resolution 2166 demands that those directly or indirectly responsible for the downing of MH17 must be held accountable and must be brought to justice. The European Parliament and the European Council have reiterated on numerous occasions their full support to the work of the Joint Investigation Team and the ongoing efforts. All States that are in a position to assist with the investigation and prosecution of those responsible must fully cooperate with the ongoing criminal investigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Result of Roll-Call Votes of 28.05.2020 Table of Content
    Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee on Environment, Food Safety and Public Health Result of roll-call votes of 28.05.2020 Table of content 1. Establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investment - Bas Eickhout (Verts/ALE), Sirpa Pietikäinen (PPE) ........................................................................................................................................... 2 Key to symbols: + (in favour), - (against), 0 (abstention) 1 1. Establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investment - Bas Eickhout (Verts/ALE), Sirpa Pietikäinen (PPE) 96 + GUE/NGL Malin BJÖRK, José GUSMÃO, Anja HAZEKAMP, Petros KOKKALIS, Chris MACMANUS, Silvia MODIG, Dimitrios PAPADIMOULIS NI Eleonora EVI, Athanasios KONSTANTINOU, Piernicola PEDICINI PPE Bartosz ARŁUKOWICZ, Hildegard BENTELE, Isabel BENJUMEA BENJUMEA, Stefan BERGER, Nathalie COLIN-OESTERLÉ, Christian DOLESCHAL, Agnès EVREN, Markus FERBER, Frances FITZGERALD, José Manuel GARCÍA-MARGALLO Y MARFIL, Danuta Maria HÜBNER, Othmar KARAS, Georgios KYRTSOS, Esther DE LANGE, Peter LIESE, Aušra MALDEIKIENĖ, Fulvio MARTUSCIELLO, Liudas MAŽYLIS, Dolors MONTSERRAT, Dan- Ștefan MOTREANU, Siegfried MUREŞAN, Luděk NIEDERMAYER, Lídia PEREIRA, Sirpa PIETIKÄINEN, Christine SCHNEIDER, Ralf SEEKATZ, Inese VAIDERE, Pernille WEISS, Michal WIEZIK RENEW Gilles BOYER, Pascal CANFIN, Luis GARICANO, Martin HOJSÍK, Jan HUITEMA, Billy KELLEHER, Ondřej KOVAŘÍK, Caroline NAGTEGAAL, Dragoș PÎSLARU, Frédérique RIES, María Soraya RODRÍGUEZ RAMOS, Nicolae ŞTEFĂNUȚĂ, Nils TORVALDS,
    [Show full text]
  • 0922 Racial Equity Equality and Justice
    Commission on Security & Cooperation in Europe: U.S. Helsinki Commission “Racial Equity, Equality, and Justice: Reinforcing U.S.-EU Parliamentary Coordination to Combat Racism and Systemic Discrimination” Committee Members Present: Senator Ben Cardin (D-MD), Ranking Member; Representative Gwen Moore (D-WI); Representative Marc Veasey (D-TX) Other Members Present: Representative Sheila Jackson Lee (D-TX) Representative Jim Costa (D-CA); Representative Sylvia Garcia (D-TX); Representative Karen Bass (D-CA); Representative Gregory Meeks (D-NY); Representative Ted Deutch (D-FL) Other Participants: Maria Arena, Member, European Parliament; David McAllister, Member, European Parliament; Juan Fernando Lopez, Member, European Parliament; Kristen Clarke, President and Executive Director, National Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law; Pap Ndiaye, French Historian; Hilary Shelton, Director, Washington Bureau, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP); Helena Dalli, European Commissioner for Equality; Radoslaw Sirkorsi, Member, European Parliament; Isabel Wiseler, Member, European Parliament; Maria Walsh, Member, European Parliament; Sanchez Amor, Member, European Parliament; Isabel Santos, Member, European Parliament; Samira Rafaela, Member, European Parliament; Jaak Madison, Member, European Parliament; Salima Yenbou, Member, European Parliament; Alice Kuhnke, Member, European Parliament; Assita Kanko, Member, European Parliament; Miguel Urban Crespo, EP Member, European Parliament; Marek Belka, Member, European
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Annual Report
    ANNUAL REPORT 2010 Bruegel’s members State members Corporate members Austria Areva Belgium Deutsche Bank Cyprus Deutsche Telekom Denmark EDF Finland Ernst & Young France Erste Bank Group Germany GDF Suez Greece Goldman Sachs Hungary Google Ireland Microsoft Italy Novartis Lithuania Pfizer Luxembourg Qualcomm Netherlands Renault Poland Samsung Electronics Slovenia Syngenta Sweden UniCredit Spain United Kingdom Institutional members European Investment Bank European Bank for Reconstruction and Development Members as of June 2011. For further information about Bruegel’s governance and its relationship with its members, see page 31. PAGE 2 BRUEGEL’S ANNUAL REPORT 2010 Contents BRUEGEL’S MISSION . .4 CHAIRMAN’S MESSAGE . .5 DIRECTOR’S INTRODUCTION . .6 OPERATIONAL REVIEW BY RESEARCH AREA . .8 A. GOVERNING THE NEW GLOBAL ECONOMY . .8 B. HEIGHTENED MACROECONOMIC CHALLENGES FOR EUROPE . .12 C. EUROPE’S QUEST FOR ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE . .16 D. COMPETITION AND REGULATION IN A MORE INTERVENTIONIST EUROPE . .19 E. CLIMATE AND ENERGY IN THE POST-COPENHAGEN CONTEXT . .23 MEDIA AND COMMUNICATION . .26 FUNDED RESEARCH PROJECTS . .27 TEAM DEVELOPMENT . .29 GOVERNANCE . .31 FINANCIALS . .33 AUDITOR’S REPORT . .37 BRUEGEL’S PEOPLE . .38 BRUEGEL’S ANNUAL REPORT 2010 PAGE 3 Bruegel’s mission BRUEGEL AIMS TO CONTRIBUTE TO THE QUALITY OF ECONOMIC POLICYMAKING IN EUROPE THROUGH OPEN, FACT-BASED AND POLICY-RELEVANT RESEARCH, ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION. Bruegel is defined by five key features: Outward-oriented focus. Bruegel aims to con- are fully independent. All publications are tribute to a better understanding of the eco- released under the signature of their nomic challenges and responsibilities facing author(s), and Bruegel itself abstains from Europe in the context of globalisation.
    [Show full text]