DOCSLIB.ORG

The “New” District Court Activism in Historical As Umpires, Not Players

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The “New” District Court Activism in Historical As Umpires, Not Players 39707-nys_72-2 Sheet No. 1 Side A 01/15/2018 10:23:44 \\jciprod01\productn\n\nys\72-2\FRONT722.txt unknown Seq: 1 15-JAN-18 9:55 NEW YORK UNIVERSITY ANNUAL SURVEY OF AMERICAN LAW VOLUME 72 ISSUE 2 39707-nys_72-2 Sheet No. 1 Side A 01/15/2018 10:23:44 NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW ARTHUR T. VANDERBILT HALL Washington Square New York City 39707-nys_72-2 Sheet No. 5 Side A 01/15/2018 10:23:44 \\jciprod01\productn\N\NYS\72-2\NYS201.txt unknown Seq: 1 15-JAN-18 9:53 THE “NEW” DISTRICT COURT ACTIVISM IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM JESSICA A. ROTH* Historically, the debate over the judicial role has centered on the consti- tutional and administrative law decisions of the United States Supreme Court, with an occasional glance at the Federal Courts of Appeals. It has, moreover, been concerned solely with the “in-court” behavior of Article III appellate judges as they carry out their power and duty “to say what the law is” in the context of resolving “cases and controversies.” This Article seeks to deepen the discussion of the appropriate role of Article III judges by broaden- ing it to trial, as well as appellate, judges; and by distinguishing between an Article III judge’s “decisional” activities on the one hand, and the judge’s “hortatory” and other activities on the other. To that end, the Article focuses on a cohort of deeply respected federal district judges-many, although not all, experienced Clinton appointees in the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York–who, over the last decade, have challenged conventional norms of judi- cial behavior to urge reform of fundamental aspects of the federal criminal justice system. These “new” judicial activists have made their case for reform in the pages of their judicial opinions, often in dicta; in articles and speeches; and through advocacy within and beyond the judicial branch. This Article summarizes this activity, places it in historical context, and assesses its value as well as its risks. I. Introduction......................................... 188 R 39707-nys_72-2 Sheet No. 5 Side A 01/15/2018 10:23:44 II. A Summary of the “New” District Court Activism . 193 R A. The Overly Punitive State . 194 R 1. Background ................................. 194 R 2. Mass Incarceration. 198 R 3. Alternatives to Incarceration . 202 R 4. Collateral Consequences of Conviction . 205 R B. The Excesses of Prosecutorial Discretion . 209 R 1. Overcharging ................................ 210 R 2. Undercharging .............................. 215 R * Associate Professor of Law, Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law. I am grateful to Michelle Adams, Gabriel J. Chin, Bruce Green, Kyron Huigens, Benjamin Lawsky, Burt Neuborne, Daniel Richman, and Kate Stith for very helpful comments on earlier drafts of this paper and to participants in the 2016 Ethics Schmooze and CrimFest 2016, where this Article was presented as a work in progress. Thanks also to Ben Cain, Rachel Karpoff, and Josh Ontell for excellent research assistance. 187 39707-nys_72-2 Sheet No. 5 Side B 01/15/2018 10:23:44 \\jciprod01\productn\N\NYS\72-2\NYS201.txt unknown Seq: 2 15-JAN-18 9:53 188 NYU ANNUAL SURVEY OF AMERICAN LAW [Vol. 72:187 3. Criminal Discovery . 219 R III. The “New” District Court Activism in Historical Context ............................................. 228 R A. A Search for Historical Parallel . 228 R B. Why Now? ....................................... 236 R 1. The Impact of Booker . 236 R 2. Social and Political Context. 240 R 3. Shifting Judicial Roles and Norms . 246 R 4. The New Media Environment. 250 R IV. Evaluating the “New” District Court Activism. 252 R A. The Value of the “New” District Court Activism . 252 R B. Reasons for Concern ............................ 259 R C. Possible New Mechanisms of Judicial Input . 265 R 1. A Greater Institutionalized Role in Clemency .................................... 265 R 2. Annual Open-Ended Surveys of District Court Judges and Exit Interviews . 267 R 3. A Judicial Clearinghouse and Dissent Channel ..................................... 268 R V. Conclusion .......................................... 269 R VI. Appendix............................................ 272 R The role of an umpire and a judge is critical. They make sure everybody plays by the rules. But it is a limited role. Nobody ever went to a ballgame to see the umpire.1 [F]or too long, too many judges (including me) have been too quiet about an evil of which we are ourselves a part: the mass incarceration of people in the United States today.2 39707-nys_72-2 Sheet No. 5 Side B 01/15/2018 10:23:44 I. INTRODUCTION You do not have to agree fully with Chief Justice Roberts’ insis- tence that Supreme Court Justices never do anything but call balls and strikes to believe that, most of the time, judges should try to act as umpires, not players. When the ground rules are relatively clear, 1. John Roberts, Chief Justice, Supreme Court of the United States, Statement During Nomination Hearings Before the Senate Judiciary Committee (Sept. 12, 2005) (transcript available at http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/09/12/ roberts.statement [https://perma.cc/69M3-GK8Z]). 2. Jed S. Rakoff, U.S. Dist. Judge, S. Dist. N.Y., Mass Incarceration and the “Fourth Principle,” Speech at Harvard Law Sch. Conference (Apr. 10, 2015) (transcript available at https://bol.bna.com/judge-rakoff-speaks-out-at-harvard- conference-full-speech/ [https://perma.cc/9T6H-7YUK]). 39707-nys_72-2 Sheet No. 6 Side A 01/15/2018 10:23:44 \\jciprod01\productn\N\NYS\72-2\NYS201.txt unknown Seq: 3 15-JAN-18 9:53 2018] THE “NEW” DISTRICT COURT ACTIVISM 189 the strike zone is well-defined, and the game is working well, an umpire/judge should seek to apply the rules fairly and blend into the background. What should happen, though, when an exper- ienced umpire/judge believes that the rules are harming the game, threatening one or more of the players with serious injury? Notwith- standing Justice Roberts’s insistence that “[n]obody ever went to a ballgame to see the umpire,” over the last decade, a cohort of well- respected and experienced federal trial judges have engaged in an unmistakably public campaign for criminal justice reform that causes them to look more like players than umpires. For example, as noted in the quote at the beginning of this Article, around 2015, Senior Judge Jed Rakoff in the Southern District of New York started to call attention in speeches and popular articles to “mass incarceration”—a non-judicial term favored by the political left— and declared that judges had a duty to speak out against it.3 Previ- ously, he had engaged in a similar campaign regarding what he saw as federal prosecutors’ failure to aggressively prosecute white-collar criminals and corporations in the wake of the financial crisis of 2007–08.4 Other judges—including, for example, now-former Judge John Gleeson in the Eastern District of New York—have fo- cused on issues such as prosecutorial overcharging in drug cases and the collateral consequences of convictions on the employment, housing, and educational opportunities of persons previously con- victed of a crime. As Douglas Berman recently described the phe- nomenon, “A growing number of federal judges, usefully insulated by life tenure, are feeling a need to speak out[,] . moved by the broader public conversation about the need for reforms.”5 By and large, President Bill Clinton appointed these judges in 39707-nys_72-2 Sheet No. 6 Side A 01/15/2018 10:23:44 the 1990s. Most of them had been on the bench for at least a dec- ade before they engaged in this activity. Some, like Judges Gleeson 3. See id.; see also Jed S. Rakoff, Mass Incarceration: The Silence of the Judges, N.Y. REV. BOOKS (May 21, 2015), http://www.nybooks.com/articles/2015/05/21/mass- incarceration-silence-judges/ [https://perma.cc/Y9SQ-SKLN]. 4. See, e.g., Jed S. Rakoff, The Financial Crisis: Why Have No High-Level Executives Been Prosecuted?, N.Y. REV. BOOKS (Jan. 9, 2014), http://www.nybooks.com/arti cles/2014/01/09/financial-crisis-why-no-executive-prosecutions/ [https://perma .cc/7DAR-D6NH]. 5. Stephanie Clifford, From the Bench, a New Look at Punishment, N.Y. TIMES (Aug. 26, 2015), https://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/27/nyregion/from-the- bench-a-new-look-at-punishment.html?_r=0 [https://perma.cc/7DAR-D6NH] (quoting Douglas Berman, law professor at the Ohio University Moritz College of Law). Moreover, “certain [judges] say, ‘That broader conversation ought to be re- flected in the work that I do, not just in the work that the political branch does.’” Id. (quoting Douglas Berman). 39707-nys_72-2 Sheet No. 6 Side B 01/15/2018 10:23:44 \\jciprod01\productn\N\NYS\72-2\NYS201.txt unknown Seq: 4 15-JAN-18 9:53 190 NYU ANNUAL SURVEY OF AMERICAN LAW [Vol. 72:187 and Rakoff, were long-time federal prosecutors before ascending to the bench, but others, such as Judge Mark Bennett in Iowa, who has played a prominent role in this effort, had different professional backgrounds. The appendix to this Article contains a table setting forth the professional backgrounds, year of appointment, and name and party of the President who appointed the judges dis- cussed in the text of this Article. I call the project that these judges collectively engaged in the “new” district court activism in criminal justice reform. I hesitate to use the term “activism” at all, given that it has become little more than an epithet for describing judges and decisions with which the speaker disagrees.6 But I use it nevertheless, for two reasons.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Program on Corporate Compliance and Enforcement Business Law in the Public Interest Mark Steward, Maria T
    Program on Corporate Compliance and Enforcement Business Law in the Public Interest Mark Steward, Maria T. Vullo, Director of Enforcement Superintendent, and Market Oversight, NY Department Financial Conduct Deputy Attorney General Sally Quillian Yates of Financial Services Authority, U.K. Jay Clayton, Chair, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Assistant Attorney General Leslie Caldwell Attorney General Eric Holder Preet Bharara, U.S. Attorney, Benjamin Lawsky, Southern District Superintendent, NY Department of New York of Financial Services Mary Jo White, Chair, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Judge Jed Rakoff, U.S. District Judge, David Green, Director, Southern District of U.K. Serious Fraud Office New York IV PROGRAM ON CORPORATE COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT History and Mission The NYU School of Law Program on Corporate Compliance and Enforcement (PCCE) is a law and policy program created to promote effective enforcement and compliance. Among other activities, each year PCCE hosts conferences and forums, bringing together some of the most prominent academics, lawyers, and judges in the world for off-the-record, moderated discus- sions of how to structure enforcement policy and compliance in order to effectively deter corporate misconduct. By gathering experts with diverse experi- ence and viewpoints, we undertake the collaborative process of understanding and deterring corporate misconduct; building efficient, effective, and sustain- able compliance programs; and establishing a fair and just process in accomplishing these goals. In addition, PCCE maintains a blog that informs public discourse on these issues and runs educa- tional programs for foreign graduate students, foreign enforcement officials and practitioners, and directors and executives in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • The E&S Empire Express April 2013
    April 2013 The E&S Empire Express One Exchange Plaza, Tel: 646-292-5500 55 Broadway, 29th Floor, New York, NY 10006-3728 E-mail: [email protected] Web site: www.elany.org in handling claims and that most of the problems encountered were Overall, the Insurance with flood claims. Industry Responded Sutton said that the homeowners market in coastal areas was frag- Admirably to ile with many policies placed in the nonadmitted market. He also Superstorm Sandy urged the panelists to standardize hurricane deductible triggers and then encouraged them to consider giving customers the option to he insurance industry can make a pretty fine whipping boy buy back hurricane deductibles because of the large out-of-pocket Tat times, particularly in trying circumstances like Superstorm expense homeowners would face. Sandy with so many suffering so much and looking to blame some- thing other than the fates themselves. Ellen Melchionni, President of the New York Insurance Association, also said her member companies did a good job in handling claims, In New York at least, the industry appeared to acquit itself quite well, noting that 94% of the claims had been closed at the hearing date of according to a report card established by the Department of Financial February 26, 2013 with a satisfaction rate of greater than 99%. Services (DFS) that showed less than half a percent of the nearly 375,000 claims generated complaints. She said more needed to be done to prepare for future disasters. “Steps need to be taken to ensure insurance adjusters have prior- ELANY’s Executive Director Dan Maher joined the chorus of praise for ity access to affected areas, the state should have a comprehensive the 24 companies included in the report.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT of NEW YORK ------X : in Re: : Chapter 11 : RUBIE’S COSTUME COMPANY, INC., Et Al
    Case 8-20-71970-ast Doc 74 Filed 05/26/20 Entered 05/26/20 19:45:36 PRESENTMENT DATE: JUNE 11, 2020 AT 12:00 p.m. OBJECTION DEADLINE: JUNE 11, 2020 AT 11:00 a.m. MEYER, SUOZZI, ENGLISH & KLEIN, P.C. TOGUT, SEGAL & SEGAL LLP Edward J. LoBello Frank A. Oswald Howard B. Kleinberg Brian F. Moore Jordan D. Weiss One Penn Plaza, Suite 3335 990 Stewart Avenue, Suite 300 New York, New York 10119 Garden City, New York 11530 (212) 594-5000 (516) 741-6565 Proposed Counsel to the Debtors and Debtors in Possession UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------x : In re: : Chapter 11 : RUBIE’S COSTUME COMPANY, INC., et al. : Case No. 20-71970 : Debtors. : (Jointly Administered) : ---------------------------------------------------------------x NOTICE OF PRESENTMENT OF THE DEBTORS’ APPLICATION FOR ENTRY OF AN ORDER AUTHORIZING THE EMPLOYMENT AND RETENTION OF SSG ADVISORS, LLC AS INVESTMENT BANKER FOR THE DEBTORS NUNC PRO TUNC TO THE PETITION DATE PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on June 11, 2020 at 12:00 p.m. (the “Presentment Date”), Rubie’s Costume Company, Inc. (“Rubies”), Forum Novelties Inc. (“Forum”), Buyseasons Enterprises, LLC (“Buyseasons”), Masquerade, LLC (“Masquerade”), The Diamond Collection LLC (“Diamond Collection”), and Rubie’s Masquerade Company LLC (“Rubie’s Masquerade”), Debtors and Debtors-in-Possession (collectively, the “Debtors”) by their proposed counsel, will present the annexed application (the “Application”) to the Honorable Alan S. Trust, United States Bankruptcy
    [Show full text]
  • Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Fordham University School of Law Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law Volume 18, Number 4 2013 Article 6 Regulation of Foreign Banks Operating in the United States: A State Regulator’s Controversial Pursuit of a London-Based Bank Kenneth S. Rosenzweig∗ ∗ Copyright c 2013 by the authors. Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law is produced by The Berkeley Electronic Press (bepress). http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/jcfl Regulation of Foreign Banks Operating in the United States: A State Regulator’s Controversial Pursuit of a London-Based Bank∗ Kenneth S. Rosenzweig Abstract Benjamin M. Lawsky and the New York State Department of Financial Services upended the regulatory dynamics of the international banking world in August of 2012 when the New York agency reached a staggering settlement with Standard Chartered Bank. The Department of Fi- nancial Services accused the bank, which is headquartered in London, but maintains a profitable branch in New York, of violating laws related to United States sanctions imposed upon certain financial transactions with Iran. Although allegations of this sort are not unprecedented, Lawsky’s actions and the $340 million settlement were alarming because, in this case, the state regulator acted without any involvement from federal regulators, who were “on the verge of concluding” that the majority of Standard Chartered’s transactions with Iran were legal. The settlement illus- trates the tension between state and federal regulators when confronted with alleged violations of law committed by a foreign bank. Specifically, the settlement raises the question of whether a state regulator should be involved in the regulation of a foreign bank operating in the United States, particularly when the bank is primarily violating federal laws that implicate issues of for- eign policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Imagining Eminent Domain: the Embodied Imaginaries of the Atlantic Yards – Barclays Center Project
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works School of Arts & Sciences Theses Hunter College Fall 1-6-2021 (Re)Imagining Eminent Domain: The Embodied Imaginaries of the Atlantic Yards – Barclays Center Project Gabriel Frey Schuster CUNY Hunter College How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/hc_sas_etds/677 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] (Re)Imagining Eminent Domain: The Embodied Imaginaries of the Atlantic Yards – Barclays Center Project by Gabriel Frey Schuster Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Geography, Hunter College The City University of New York 2020 January 6, 2021 Marianna Pavlovskaya Date Thesis Sponsor January 6, 2021 Peter Marcotullio Date Second Reader Acknowledgements I would like to thank the following people who helped me complete this thesis: My thesis advisor, Professor Marianna Pavlovskaya, for her support, input, and patience. My second reader, Professor Marcotullio, for his grounding thought and willingness to help. The administrative staff of the Hunter College Geography Department. Alice Wang, for her willingness to explain – repeatedly – how to gather and cite legal documents. And my parents for their constant support and occasional hounding. 2 Table of Contents I. Introduction ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • District Court Activism in Criminal Justice Reform
    THE “NEW” DISTRICT COURT ACTIVISM IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM JESSICA A. ROTH* Historically, the debate over the judicial role has centered on the consti- tutional and administrative law decisions of the United States Supreme Court, with an occasional glance at the Federal Courts of Appeals. It has, moreover, been concerned solely with the “in-court” behavior of Article III appellate judges as they carry out their power and duty “to say what the law is” in the context of resolving “cases and controversies.” This Article seeks to deepen the discussion of the appropriate role of Article III judges by broaden- ing it to trial, as well as appellate, judges; and by distinguishing between an Article III judge’s “decisional” activities on the one hand, and the judge’s “hortatory” and other activities on the other. To that end, the Article focuses on a cohort of deeply respected federal district judges-many of whom, al- though not all, experienced Clinton appointees in the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York–who, over the last decade, have challenged conven- tional norms of judicial behavior to urge reform of fundamental aspects of the federal criminal justice system. These “new” judicial activists have made their case for reform in the pages of their judicial opinions, often in dicta; in articles and speeches; and through advocacy within and beyond the judicial branch. This Article summarizes this activity, places it in historical context, and assesses its value as well as its risks. I. Introduction......................................... 278 II. A Summary of the “New” District Court Activism .... 283 A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Insurance Receiver Is Intended to Provide Readers with Information on and Provide a Forum for Opinions and Discussions of Insurance Insolvency Topics
    Summer 2012 Volume 21, Number 1 FEATURED ARTICLES 1 IAIR’s President’s Message By Francesca G. Bliss 3 Equal Opportunity Offenders By Evan Bennett 10 In Memoriam: Stephen L. Wright from a career at the New York Liquidation Bureau, I very much wanted to stay involved with my “work family.” IAIR, an organization in which I have 11 View from Washington participated since its inception, has been key in bringing me in contact with some By Charlie Richardson of the most knowledgeable individuals in the insolvency industry. Their 13 The Perfect Receiver willingness to share their experiences and their know-how has proven to be By Patrick Cantilo, CIR-ML invaluable, as have the friendships which have been forged. I believe in the mission of this association and want to see it both grow and recapture the sense of 14 IAIR Welcomes its camaraderie that drew me in. Newest Members Despite there being a much talk about the decline in liquidations, the role we serve in 16 Same Difference, Right? the process, both as an organization and individually, is very important. In recent 2012 Insolvency Workshop years, we have tried to reinvent ourselves, in a way, by changing our mission and Wrap Up focusing more on how all of us can provide guidance through the various processes By Bart Boles and that troubled companies face - from a decline in performance, to rehabilitation, into Lowell Miller receivership and through liquidation. Having been in the liquidation office, I know 18 There are options – first-hand the importance of that role and that the expectations of what can be done A different approach to continually change.
    [Show full text]
  • “They Tried to Bury Us, but They Didn't Know We Were Seeds.” “Trataron De Enterrarnos, Pero No Sabían Que Éramos Semil
    "They Tried to Bury Us, But They Didn't Know We Were Seeds." "Trataron de Enterrarnos, Pero No Sabían Que Éramos Semillas" - The Mexican American/Raza Studies Political and Legal Struggle: A Content Analysis Item Type text; Electronic Dissertation Authors Arce, Martin Sean Citation Arce, Martin Sean. (2020). "They Tried to Bury Us, But They Didn't Know We Were Seeds." "Trataron de Enterrarnos, Pero No Sabían Que Éramos Semillas" - The Mexican American/Raza Studies Political and Legal Struggle: A Content Analysis (Doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA). Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction, presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 24/09/2021 20:52:15 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/656744 “THEY TRIED TO BURY US, BUT THEY DIDN’T KNOW WE WERE SEEDS.” “TRATARON DE ENTERRARNOS, PERO NO SABÍAN QUE ÉRAMOS SEMILLAS.” - THE MEXICAN AMERICAN/RAZA STUDIES POLITICAL AND LEGAL STRUGGLE: A CONTENT ANALYSIS by Martín Arce ______________________________ Copyright © Martín Arce 2020 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF TEACHING, LEARNING & SOCIOCULTURAL STUDIES In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2020 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Without the love and support of my familia, the completion of this dissertation would not have been possible. My brothers Tom Arce, Gil Arce, and Troy Arce are foundational to my upbringing and to who I am today.
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF Version
    Winter 2016–17 OBAMA’S LEGACY PROFESSOR ROBERT Y. SHAPIRO CONSIDERS THE Columbia PRESIDENT’S TIME IN OFFICE College THE TRANS LIST SELECTIONS FROM PORTRAIT Today PHOTOGRAPHER TIMOTHY GREENFIELD-SANDERS ’74 HOMECOMING VICTORY LIONS SMACK DOWN The DARTMOUTH 9–7 Alumni in the know offer-tos fun, practical how 30 YEARS OF COLUMBIA COLLEGE WOMEN On May 13, 1987, Columbia College graduated its first coeducational class, and the College was forever changed. Join us, 30 years later, for a one-day symposium as we reflect on how women have transformed the College experience, ways College women are shaping the world and why coeducation and gender equality remain topics of great importance to us all. Save the Date SATURDAY, APRIL 22, 2017 Learn more: college.columbia.edu/alumni/ccw30years Registration opens in February. To join the Host Committee, email [email protected]. Contents 30 YEARS OF COLUMBIA COLLEGE WOMEN Columbia College CCT Today VOLUME 44 NUMBER 2 WINTER 2016–17 EDITOR IN CHIEF Alex Sachare ’71 EXECUTIVE EDITOR Lisa Palladino DEPUTY EDITOR 24 12 28 Jill C. Shomer CLASS NOTES EDITOR Anne-Ryan Heatwole JRN’09 FORUM EDITOR Rose Kernochan BC’82 CONTRIBUTING WRITER features Shira Boss ’93, JRN’97, SIPA’98 EDITORIAL INTERN 12 Aiyana K. White ’18 ART DIRECTOR The Experts Eson Chan Alumni in the know offer fun, practical how-tos. Published quarterly by the Columbia College Office of By Alexis Boncy SOA’11; Shira Boss ’93, JRN’97, SIPA’98; Alumni Affairs and Development Anne-Ryan Heatwole JRN’09; Kim Martineau JRN’97, SPS’14; for alumni, students, faculty, parents and friends of Columbia College.
    [Show full text]
  • Protests Against Fed Judge Garaufis After German Chancellor's Visit
    S O C V ΓΡΑΦΕΙ ΤΗΝ ΙΣΤΟΡΙΑ Bringing the news W ΤΟΥ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΣΜΟΥ to generations of E ΑΠΟ ΤΟ 1915 The National Herald Greek- Americans N c v A wEEkly GREEk-AmERICAn PublICATIOn www.thenationalherald.com VOL. 15, ISSUE 783 October 13-19 , 2012 $1.50 Protests After German Chancellor’s Visit, What is Greece’s Next Step? Against Merkel’s Trip Signals Eurozone Seeks to Fed Judge Be More Supportive Garaufis By Andy Dabilis TNH Staff Writer Jurist Maligned ATHENS – Declaring German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s six- for Affirmative hour visit to meet him a sign that Greece has ended its inter - Action in FDNY national economic isolation, Prime Minister Antonis Samaras By Mosi Secret turned to the more difficult task The New York Times of convincing international lenders to sign off on a package of $17.45 billion in spending One after another, nearly 150 cuts and tax hikes needed to re - white firefighters approached a lease more welfare aid to the lectern facing a federal judge government. and, voices sometimes trem - Guarded by 7,000 police, bling with anger, decried what snipers and with army and navy they called a perversion of jus - commandos on standby as tice. Years of hard work to make 50,000 protesters were kept far it into the ranks of the depart - away, Merkel offered praise to ment were being tossed aside to Samaras for continuing her de - make way for unqualified mi - PHOTOS: ASSOCIATED PRESS mands for more austerity, but nority candidates, they said, all PM Antonis Samaras and Chancellor Angela Merkel paid close put forth no relief in what was in a questionable effort to end attention to each other (top).
    [Show full text]
  • Members by Circuit (As of January 3, 2017)
    Federal Judges Association - Members by Circuit (as of January 3, 2017) 1st Circuit United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Bruce M. Selya Jeffrey R. Howard Kermit Victor Lipez Ojetta Rogeriee Thompson Sandra L. Lynch United States District Court District of Maine D. Brock Hornby George Z. Singal John A. Woodcock, Jr. Jon David LeVy Nancy Torresen United States District Court District of Massachusetts Allison Dale Burroughs Denise Jefferson Casper Douglas P. Woodlock F. Dennis Saylor George A. O'Toole, Jr. Indira Talwani Leo T. Sorokin Mark G. Mastroianni Mark L. Wolf Michael A. Ponsor Patti B. Saris Richard G. Stearns Timothy S. Hillman William G. Young United States District Court District of New Hampshire Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr. Joseph N. LaPlante Landya B. McCafferty Paul J. Barbadoro SteVen J. McAuliffe United States District Court District of Puerto Rico Daniel R. Dominguez Francisco Augusto Besosa Gustavo A. Gelpi, Jr. Jay A. Garcia-Gregory Juan M. Perez-Gimenez Pedro A. Delgado Hernandez United States District Court District of Rhode Island Ernest C. Torres John J. McConnell, Jr. Mary M. Lisi William E. Smith 2nd Circuit United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Barrington D. Parker, Jr. Christopher F. Droney Dennis Jacobs Denny Chin Gerard E. Lynch Guido Calabresi John Walker, Jr. Jon O. Newman Jose A. Cabranes Peter W. Hall Pierre N. LeVal Raymond J. Lohier, Jr. Reena Raggi Robert A. Katzmann Robert D. Sack United States District Court District of Connecticut Alan H. NeVas, Sr. Alfred V. Covello Alvin W. Thompson Dominic J. Squatrito Ellen B.
    [Show full text]
  • Judge Amy Coney Barrett: Her Jurisprudence and Potential Impact on the Supreme Court
    Judge Amy Coney Barrett: Her Jurisprudence and Potential Impact on the Supreme Court October 6, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R46562 SUMMARY R46562 Judge Amy Coney Barrett: Her Jurisprudence October 6, 2020 and Potential Impact on the Supreme Court Valerie C. Brannon, On September 26, 2020, President Donald J. Trump announced the nomination of Judge Amy Coordinator Coney Barrett of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit to the Supreme Court of the Legislative Attorney United States to fill the vacancy left by the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on September 18, 2020. Judge Barrett has been a judge on the Seventh Circuit since November 2017, having Michael John Garcia, been nominated by President Trump and confirmed by the Senate earlier that year. The nominee Coordinator earned her law degree from Notre Dame Law School in 1997, and clerked for Judge Laurence H. Section Research Manager Silberman of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit and Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia. From 2002 until her appointment to the Seventh Circuit in 2017, Judge Barrett was a law professor at Notre Dame Law School, and she remains part of the law school faculty. Her Caitlain Devereaux Lewis, scholarship has focused on topics such as theories of constitutional interpretation, stare decisis, Coordinator and statutory interpretation. If confirmed, Judge Barrett would be the fifth woman to serve as a Section Research Manager Supreme Court Justice. During Judge Barrett’s September 26 Supreme Court nomination ceremony, she paid tribute to both Justice Ginsburg and her former mentor, Justice Scalia.
    [Show full text]