DOCSLIB.ORG

The Limnology and Fish Biology of Tenmile Lake, Labrador , "

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Limnology and Fish Biology of Tenmile Lake, Labrador , .+ Environment Canada Environnement Canada • Fisheries Service des peches and Marine Service et des sciences de la mer ... The Limnology and Fish Biology of TenMile Lake, Labrador , " • by . R. F. Pa rsons Technical Report Series No, NEW/T-75-3 Resource Development Branch Newfoundland Region • , DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT FISHERIES AND MARINE SERVICE NEWFOUNDLAND REGION TECHNICAL REPORT SERIES NO. NEW/T-75-3 THE LIMNOLOGY AND FISH BIOLOGY OF TEN MILE LAKE, LABRADOR by R.F. PARSONS RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT BRANCH ST. JOHN'S, NEWFOUNDLAND A limnological investigation and fish inventory was conducted on Ten Mile Lake, Labrador, during the summer of 1974. Chemical and physical parameters were measured for the lake. The pH levels ranged between 6.0 and 6.6, while specific conductance values varied between 12.0 and 21.0 microhoms @ 25 C. The water area of the lake is 26.39 km2 with a mean depth of 2.90 m. Thermal stratification was noted in two areas of the lake. Seven fish species were sampled from the lake. These include Coregonus clupeaformis (lake whitefish), Prosopium cylindraceum (round whitefish), Salvelinus fontinalus (brook trout), Salvelinus namycush (lake trout), Esox lucius (northern pike), Catostomus commersoni (white sucker), and Lota lota (burbot). White sucker was the most abundant species, contributing 25.0% by number and 24.3% by weight of the total sample. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF FIGURES.................................................... ii LIST OF TABLES ••••• . .. ..... .. .. .... .. .. .... iv LIST OF APPENDICES.. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• vi INTRODUCTION •••••••••••• .. ..... ... ..... .. .. .. .. 1 DESCRIPTION OF THE STUDY AREA.... • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• 2 }1A.TERIALS AND METHODS.. • . • . .. • • . • . • . • . • • • • • . .. • • . • • . • • . • • 5· RESULTS AND DISCUS SION. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 9 s~y ••••..•.. II ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• , • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• 65 ACKNO~EDGMENTS •••• , •••••••••••••• It • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• 70 REFERENCES • ... .. , ............................... , .............. 71 APPENDIX ••• ... ...... .. ...... .. ... .... ........ ..... 74 i LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Ten Mile Lake in relation to Smallwood Reservoir, Labrador ......... 41. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • 3 2. Bathymetric map of Ten Mile Lake ••..........••.••••.•.•.•. 6 3. Locations of gillnets and trap nets, and of the sampling stations for plankton and water quality •...•.•.•.••.•••••• 7 4. Temperature profile showing thermocline in two areas of Ten Mi Ie Lake............................................. 11 5. Dissolved oxygen profile showing chemocline in two areas of Ten Mile Lake........................................... 12 6. Fish-length to scale-length relationship for lake white­ fish from Ten Mile Lake ................................... 20 7. Comparison of growth rates for lake whitefish from Ten Mile Lake and Jacopie Lake, Labrador .•..•••••••••.•••••••• 23 8. Fork-length distribution of lake whitefish •••••••••••••••• 24 9. Age-composition of lake whitefish from Ten Mile Lake •••••• 24 10. Fish-length to scale-length relationship for round white­ fish from Ten Mile Lake................................... 28 11. Comparison of growth rates for round whitefish from Ten Mile Lake, Labrador, and the Ungava area •••.•..••.•••.•.•• 29 12. Fork length distribution of round whitefish from Ten Mile Lake. 31 13. Age composition of round whitefish from Ten Mile Lake ••••• 31 14. Fish-length to scale-length relationship for northern pike from Ten Mile Lake................................... 36 15. Comparison of growth rates of northern pike from Ten Mile Lake and Jacopie Lake, Labrador........................... 38 16. Length distribution of northern pike from Ten Mile Lake •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• l1li ••• 40 17. Age composition of northern pike from Ten Mile Lake ••••••• 40 18. Comparison of the growth rates of lake trout from Labrador and other northern Canadian lakes......................... 45 ii Figure 19. Length distribution of lake trout from Ten Mile Lake •••••••• 46 20 . Age composition of lake trout from Ten Mile Lake •••••••••••• 46 21. Comparison of growth rates of brook trout from Avalon Peninsula of fiel,ffoltndland, and t~vo areas of La brador ••.•.••• 52 22. Length distribution of brook trout from Ten Mile Lake ••••••• 53 23. Age composition of brook trout from Ten Mile Lake ••••••••..• 53 24. Fish-length to scale-length relationship for white suckers from Ten Mi Ie Lake.......................................... 58 25. Comparison of growth rates for white suckers from Ten Mile Lake and the Mac Kenzie River a rea. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• 59 26. Length distribution of white suckers from Ten Mile Lake •••••• 60 27. Age composition of white suckers from Ten Mile Lake ••••••••• 60 iii LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Morphometry of Ten Mile Lake, Labrador .........•......•.•.•. 9 2. Water quality analysis from two selected stations and one deep hole on Ten Mile Lake. (Samples collected during June and July, 1974) ........................................................................ 14 3. Check-list of plankton species identified in Ten Mile Lake, 1974 ...................... 1,.".,1 •••••••••• II •••• II ••• '" ••••••••• II i6 4. Mean scale length and calculated fork length at annulus formation of lake whitefish from Ten Mile Lake •••.••.••••••• 21 5. Stomach contents of lake whitefish from Ten Mile Lake •.••••• 25 6. Mean scale length and calculated fork length at annulus formation of Ten Mile Lake round whitefish •••.•••••••••••••• 30 7. Comparison of weights for round whitefish from the different lakes ........................ 01 ....... 0 •••••••••••••••• 32 8. Stomach content analysis of round whitefish from Ten Mile Lake.. .. .. .. .. • .. • . .. .. • . .. • .. • . .. • .. .. • . • • • .. • • • • • • . • • • • .. .. • . • • • • •• 33 9. Mean scale length and calculated fork length at annulus formation of northern pike from Ten Mile Lake ••..•••••.•..•• 37 10. Stomach content analysis of northern pike from Ten Mile Lake .................... f • • .. .. • .. • • • • • • • • • .. • • • • • • • • • • • .. • • • • .. • • •• 41 11. Mean scale length and calculated fork length at annulus formation of lake trout from Ten Mile Lake .•.......•.••.•.•. 44 12. Stomach content analysis for lake trout from Ten Mile Lake ........... II ..................................................................... 48 13. Mean scale length and calculated fork length at annulus formation of brook trout from Ten Mile Lake •...••...••••.... 51 14. Stomach content analysis for brook trout from Ten Mile Lake ................................................................. o!I • .. • • •• 54 15. Mean scale length and calculated fork length at annulus formation of white suckers from Ten Mile Lake •...•..••••••.• 56 16. Stomach content analysis for white suckers from Ten Mile Lake ......................................................................... 61 iv Tab1e~' Page 17. Percent number and weight of each species taken from Ten Mile Lake, Labrador, 1974............................ 64 v LIST OF APPENDICES 1. Conversion of conductivity values to T.D.S •••.•.••••••••.. 74 2. Temperature readings for Ten Mile Lake (June-July, 1974) 75 vi INTRODUCTION A limno1ogica1 and fish inventory study of Ten Mile Lake was con­ duct d during t he summer of 197 4 . This study is part of a detailed, long-term program initiated by the Resource Deve l opment Branch i n 197 3, designed to evaluate the fiah and wa t er resources of i nland La brador. Th e objectives of this study were three-fold. It marked the first t ime that any Unatural" waters of Labrador were i nvestigated in terms of physical, chemica l and bi otic parameters. This study would also be the basis for compar ison of s t udies done on the already flooded Smallwood Reservoir. Since there we r e no baseline studie s done on the lakes which now constitute the reservoir , we can only extrapolate f r om the data now available from Ten Mi le Lake, being in the vicinity and not affected by flooding. The data obtained will also be useful for comparison with the waters and f ish resources on insular Newfoundland. -2­ DES CRIPTION OF THE STUDY AREA THE LAKE Ten Mile Lake (Fig. 1) is situated approximately 32.9 km northwest of the town of Churchill Falls at a latitude of 53°43' North and a longitude of 65°05' west. The lake has an elevation of approximately 457 m above sea level. The drainage area for the lake is approximately 2 46.3 km . most of which is small bogs; marshes and streams. The major inlet to the lake is Brook 61, (Fig. 2) flowing from the southwest. The major outlet is a large brook in the extreme western end of the lake. Ten Mile Lake is a typical glacial lake , very irregular in shape and including 268 islands. Geographic Situation: Ten Mile Lake is one of the thousands of lakes on the Labrador Plateau. The Plateau forms the eastern section of the Canadian Shield which extends across much of the northern portion of the continent. The bedrock, which is widely visible in this area, is of archaen granites and gneisses, dating back to the Cambrian era, Climate: The average annual precipitation for the Churchill Falls area is 760 rom (30"),
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Summary Report No
    Canadian Manuscript Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2614 2002 Life History Characteristics Of Freshwater Fishes Occurring in the Northwest Territories and Nunavut, With Major Emphasis on Riverine Habitat Requirements by C.L. Evans1, J.D. Reist1 and C.K. Minns2 1. Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Arctic Fish Ecology and Assessment Research, Central and Arctic Division, 501 University Crescent, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3T 2N6 Canada 2. Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Great Lakes Laboratory of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Bayfield Institute, 867 Lakeshore Road, P.O. Box 5050, Burlington, Ontario, L7R 4A6 Canada. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2002 Cat. No. Fs 97-4/2614E ISSN 0706-6473 Correct citation of this publication: Evans, C.E., J.D. Reist and C.K. Minns. 2002. Life history characteristics of freshwater fishes occurring in the Northwest Territories and Nunavut, with major emphasis on riverine habitat requirements. Can. MS Rep. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2614: xiii + 169 p. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................... v LIST OF TABLES............................................................................................................ v ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................................viii RÉSUMÉ ........................................................................................................................viii INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • FP21-02 Executive Summary
    FP21-02 Executive Summary General Description Proposal FP21-02 requests to reduce the required distance between set nets in Kuskokwim River tributaries from 150 feet to 75 feet. Submitted by the Yukon Delta National Wildlife Refuge. Proposed Regulation §___.27 (e)(4) Kuskokwim Area * * * * (xiii) Within a tributary to the Kuskokwim River in that portion of the Kuskokwim River drainage from the north end of Eek Is- land upstream to the mouth of the Kolmakoff River, you may not set or operate any part of a set gillnet within 75 150 feet of any part of another set gillnet. OSM Preliminary Conclusion Support Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta Subsistence Regional Advisory Council Recommendation Western Interior Alaska Subsistence Regional Advisory Council Recommendation Interagency Staff Committee Comments ADF&G Comments Written Public Comments None DRAFT STAFF ANALYSIS FP21-02 ISSUES Proposal FP21-02, submitted by the Yukon Delta National Wildlife Refuge, requests the Federal Subsistence Board (Board) reduce the required distance between set nets in Kuskokwim River tributaries from 150 feet to 75 feet. DISCUSSION The proponent states that current Federal subsistence fisheries regulations are not parallel with State regulations. This requested regulation change would align Federal and State regulations. The current Federal regulation is more restrictive than the current State regulation. The Alaska Board of Fisheries (BOF) changed the State regulations during the Arctic-Yukon-Kuskokwim (AYK) BOF meeting in January 2019. In addition, the proponent also states that the adoption of this proposal will reduce user confusion and enforcement concerns. Current Federal Regulation §___.27 (e)(4) Kuskokwim Area **** (xiii) Within a tributary to the Kuskokwim River in that portion of the Kuskokwim River drainage from the north end of Eek Island upstream to the mouth of the Kolmakoff River, you may not set or operate any part of a set gillnet within 150 feet of any part of another set gillnet.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Assessment for Round Whitefish
    Species Status Assessment Class: Osteichthyes (bony fishes) Family: Salmonidae (trout and whitefish) Scientific Name: Prosopium cylindraceum Common Name: Round whitefish Species synopsis: The round whitefish occurs from Alaska in the northwest to Labrador and New England in the east. With the exception of Lake Erie, its distribution includes the Great Lakes. Round whitefish lives in lakes with a well oxygenated deep zone and is native to 7 of 18 watersheds in the Adirondack Mountains. It has also been known as non-native to the Oswegatchie watershed (previously stocked) with no records since 1955. Its distribution within its historic range has shrunk to 8 sites. A stocking program has established two more populations within its former range. It is extirpated from the Upper Hudson watershed. I. Status a. Current and Legal Protected Status i. Federal _____Not Listed______________________ Candidate: ___No__ ii. New York _____Endangered, SGCN ____________________________________ b. Natural Heritage Program Rank i. Global _____G5________________________________________________________ ii. New York _____S1S2_________________ Tracked by NYNHP? _Yes__ Other Rank: Species of Northeast Regional Conservation Concern (Therres 1999) Status Discussion: Round whitefish is globally ranked as Secure, however in New York it is ranked as Imperiled/Critically Imperiled due to population declines (NatureServe 2012). 1 II. Abundance and Distribution Trends a. North America i. Abundance _____ declining _____increasing __X___ stable _____unknown ii. Distribution: _____ declining _____increasing ___X__ stable _____unknown Time frame considered: ____Based on global rank (NatureServe 2012)__ b. Regional i. Abundance _____ declining _____increasing _____stable _____unknown ii. Distribution: _____ declining _____increasing _____stable _____unknown Regional Unit Considered:___Region 5 - Northeast (Species of Concern)____ Time Frame Considered: _____________________ _________________________________ c.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Research Priorities for Lake Whitefish in the Upper Great
    DEVELOPING RESEARCH PRIORITIES FOR LAKE WHITEFISH IN THE UPPER GREAT LAKES: RESULTS OF A WORKSHOP SPONSORED BY THE GREAT LAKES FISHERY TRUST AND GREAT LAKES FISHERY COMMISSION Michigan State University February 27-28, 2018 Michigan Sea Grant Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 3 Workshop Proceedings ................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 3 Workshop Goals and Desired Outcomes ............................................................................. 4 Presentations ....................................................................................................................... 4 Impacts of Whitefish Decline on the Tribal Commercial Fishery ..................................... 4 Lake Huron Lake Whitefish Status and Trends ................................................................ 5 Lake Michigan Lake Whitefish Status and Trends ............................................................ 7 Lake Superior Lake Whitefish Status and Trends ............................................................. 8 Lower Trophic Levels ........................................................................................................ 9 Factors affecting recruitment to fisheries and management implications ..................
    [Show full text]
  • ASFIS ISSCAAP Fish List February 2007 Sorted on Scientific Name
    ASFIS ISSCAAP Fish List Sorted on Scientific Name February 2007 Scientific name English Name French name Spanish Name Code Abalistes stellaris (Bloch & Schneider 1801) Starry triggerfish AJS Abbottina rivularis (Basilewsky 1855) Chinese false gudgeon ABB Ablabys binotatus (Peters 1855) Redskinfish ABW Ablennes hians (Valenciennes 1846) Flat needlefish Orphie plate Agujón sable BAF Aborichthys elongatus Hora 1921 ABE Abralia andamanika Goodrich 1898 BLK Abralia veranyi (Rüppell 1844) Verany's enope squid Encornet de Verany Enoploluria de Verany BLJ Abraliopsis pfefferi (Verany 1837) Pfeffer's enope squid Encornet de Pfeffer Enoploluria de Pfeffer BJF Abramis brama (Linnaeus 1758) Freshwater bream Brème d'eau douce Brema común FBM Abramis spp Freshwater breams nei Brèmes d'eau douce nca Bremas nep FBR Abramites eques (Steindachner 1878) ABQ Abudefduf luridus (Cuvier 1830) Canary damsel AUU Abudefduf saxatilis (Linnaeus 1758) Sergeant-major ABU Abyssobrotula galatheae Nielsen 1977 OAG Abyssocottus elochini Taliev 1955 AEZ Abythites lepidogenys (Smith & Radcliffe 1913) AHD Acanella spp Branched bamboo coral KQL Acanthacaris caeca (A. Milne Edwards 1881) Atlantic deep-sea lobster Langoustine arganelle Cigala de fondo NTK Acanthacaris tenuimana Bate 1888 Prickly deep-sea lobster Langoustine spinuleuse Cigala raspa NHI Acanthalburnus microlepis (De Filippi 1861) Blackbrow bleak AHL Acanthaphritis barbata (Okamura & Kishida 1963) NHT Acantharchus pomotis (Baird 1855) Mud sunfish AKP Acanthaxius caespitosa (Squires 1979) Deepwater mud lobster Langouste
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Minchumina, Telida, Nikolai, and Cantwell Subsistence Community Use Profiles and Traditional Fisheries Use
    Lake Minchumina, Telida, Nikolai, and Cantwell Subsistence Community Use Profiles and Traditional Fisheries Use Technical Paper No. 295 Liz Williams,1 Chelsie Venechuk,2 Davin L. Holen,1 & William E. Simeone1 1 Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Subsistence 2 Denali National Park and Preserve, National Park Service Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Subsistence Juneau, Alaska April 2005 Lake Minchumina, Telida, Nikolai, and Cantwell Subsistence Community Use Profiles and Traditional Fisheries Use Technical Paper No. 295 Liz Williams,1 Chelsie Venechuk,2 Davin L. Holen,1 & William E. Simeone1 1 Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Subsistence 2 Denali National Park and Preserve, National Park Service Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Subsistence Juneau, Alaska April 2005 This report was prepared as part of the final report series of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Subsistence Management, Fisheries Resource Monitoring Program, as the final report for Study No. FIS 01-235. It is a companion report to Technical Paper No. 296 in the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Subsistence, Technical Paper Series. The harvest survey data from Study No. FIS 01-235 is in Technical Paper No. 296. The Alaska Department of Fish and Game administers all programs and activities free from discrimination based on race, color, national origin, age, sex, religion, marital status, pregnancy, parenthood, or disability. The department administers all programs and activities in compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972.
    [Show full text]
  • A Cyprinid Fish
    DFO - Library / MPO - Bibliotheque 01005886 c.i FISHERIES RESEARCH BOARD OF CANADA Biological Station, Nanaimo, B.C. Circular No. 65 RUSSIAN-ENGLISH GLOSSARY OF NAMES OF AQUATIC ORGANISMS AND OTHER BIOLOGICAL AND RELATED TERMS Compiled by W. E. Ricker Fisheries Research Board of Canada Nanaimo, B.C. August, 1962 FISHERIES RESEARCH BOARD OF CANADA Biological Station, Nanaimo, B0C. Circular No. 65 9^ RUSSIAN-ENGLISH GLOSSARY OF NAMES OF AQUATIC ORGANISMS AND OTHER BIOLOGICAL AND RELATED TERMS ^5, Compiled by W. E. Ricker Fisheries Research Board of Canada Nanaimo, B.C. August, 1962 FOREWORD This short Russian-English glossary is meant to be of assistance in translating scientific articles in the fields of aquatic biology and the study of fishes and fisheries. j^ Definitions have been obtained from a variety of sources. For the names of fishes, the text volume of "Commercial Fishes of the USSR" provided English equivalents of many Russian names. Others were found in Berg's "Freshwater Fishes", and in works by Nikolsky (1954), Galkin (1958), Borisov and Ovsiannikov (1958), Martinsen (1959), and others. The kinds of fishes most emphasized are the larger species, especially those which are of importance as food fishes in the USSR, hence likely to be encountered in routine translating. However, names of a number of important commercial species in other parts of the world have been taken from Martinsen's list. For species for which no recognized English name was discovered, I have usually given either a transliteration or a translation of the Russian name; these are put in quotation marks to distinguish them from recognized English names.
    [Show full text]
  • The Life History of the Round Whitefish, Prosopium Cylindraceum (Pallas) of Newfound Lake, New Hampshire
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Doctoral Dissertations Student Scholarship Spring 1963 THE LIFE HISTORY OF THE ROUND WHITEFISH, PROSOPIUM CYLINDRACEUM (PALLAS) OF NEWFOUND LAKE, NEW HAMPSHIRE DONALD ARTHUR NORMANDEAU Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation Recommended Citation NORMANDEAU, DONALD ARTHUR, "THE LIFE HISTORY OF THE ROUND WHITEFISH, PROSOPIUM CYLINDRACEUM (PALLAS) OF NEWFOUND LAKE, NEW HAMPSHIRE" (1963). Doctoral Dissertations. 789. https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation/789 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This dissertation has been 64-206 microfilmed exactly as received NORMANDEAU, Donald Arthur, 1935- THE UFE HISTORY OF THE ROUND WHITEFISH, PROSOPIUM CYLINDRACEUM (PALLAS) OF NEWFOUND LAKE, N. H. University of New Hampshire, Ph.D., 1963 Zoology University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. n . Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. THE LIFE HISTORY OF THE ROUND WHITEFISH PROSOPIUM CYLINDRACEUM (PALLAS) OF NEWFOUND LAKE, N .H . BY DONALD Ai NORMANDEAU B. S., St. Anselm's College, 19$7 M. S., University of New Hampshire, 1961 A THESIS Submitted to the University of New Hampshire In Partial Fulfillment of Ihe Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate School Department of Zoology June, 1963 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • Call Numbers for Salmonidae
    CALL NUMBERS FOR SALMONIDAE Use this chart for the special breakdown of QL638.S2. The names in boldface represent authorized Library of Congress subject headings. Works on ciscoes, salmon, trout, and whitefish using these common names but covering species within one genus will be classed under the specific genus. Made-up example: Title: Guide to trouts. Subjects: Cutthroat (Oncorhynchus clarkii), rainbow trout (O. mykiss), and Apache trout (O. apache). Class under: Oncorhynchus (.S25) Works on ciscoes, salmon, trout, and whitefish covering species which belong to more than one genus but which fall collectively under one of these common names will be classed under the Cutter for the common name. Made-up example: Title: Guide to trouts. Subjects: Cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii), brown trout (Salmo trutta), and lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush). Class under: “trout” (.S216) The fishes are arranged by scientific (Latin) nomenclature. Only the most current standard scientific (Latin) name is given. Obsolete and debated scientific names are numerous. Adjustments to taxonomical classification are not uncommon, including reclassification to a different genus. The previous or alternative versions of common (vernacular) names are shown. Be aware that some market names (those used commercially) are scientifically incorrect. For brevity, this table excludes some species and races, particularly under Coregonus and Salvelinus. ARLIS Call Numbers for Salmonidae under QL638 Salmonidae Salmonidae (in general or two or more genuses) .S2 Coregonidae
    [Show full text]
  • Pygmy Whitefish Prosopium Coulteri in the Naknek River System of Southwest Alaska
    PYGMY WHITEFISH PROSOPIUM COULTERI IN THE NAKNEK RIVER SYSTEM OF SOUTHWEST ALASKA By WILLIAM R. HEARD and WILBUR L. HARTMAN, Fishery Biologists (Research) BUREAU of COMMERCIAL FISHERIES BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY, AUKE BAY, ALASKA ABSTRACT The pygmy whitefish is widely distributed through­ Dipteran insects were the principal foods eaten by out the lakes of the Naknek River system in southwest pygmy whitefish in South Bay. Crustacean plankton Alaska. It is a small abundant species in some lakes dominated their diet in Brooks Lake. In .other areas of the system and may occupy a more prominent place insects and zooplankton were about equal in impor­ in the population dynamics of fishes in the Naknek tance. Growth and insect consumption were correlated system than in other geographic areas where it has been positively. studied. Specimens were collected with a variety of Spawning occurs in November and December, appar­ sampling gear including gill nets, tow nets, otter trawls, ently only at night. South Bay fish spawn in lower and seines. Pygmy whitefish occurred in all benthic Brooks River. Eggs in ripe females from South Bay habitats from shallow littoral depths to bathybenthic averaged 2.4 mm. in diameter, and the ovaries were areas. Seasonally in certain age groups and in certain 16.5 percent of the body weight. The fork length­ areas they occurred in Iimnetic areas of lakes and in fecundity relation of Naknek system pygmy whitefish streams. In the Naknek system, 18 species, including has the equation the young of commercially valuable sockeye salmon Log E= -2.9552+2.7513 Log L and the closely related round whitefish, were ecological associates of pygmy whitefish.
    [Show full text]
  • 70860943.Pdf
    ECOLOGICAL FACTORS INFLUENCING FISH DISTRIBUTION IN A LARGE SUBARCTIC LAKE SYSTEM A THESIS Presented to the Faculty Of the University of Alaska Fairbanks in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE By Miranda Paige Plumb, B.S. Fairbanks, Alaska May 2006 iii Abstract The coastal climate and frequent wind storms in southwest Alaska create an atypical thermal environment (non-stratified in summer) in the remote Ugashik lakes. This study documents the distribution of lake trout Salvelinus namaycush, Arctic char S. alpinus, Dolly Varden S. malma, Arctic grayling Thymallus arcticus, round whitefish Prosopium cylindraceum, and pygmy whitefish P. coulterii relative to depth, substrate particle size, food habits, length, and age in the absence of strong thermal structure. Sample sites were randomly chosen within sampling strata and gill nets were set at each site. Lake trout and round whitefish were most abundant and had the oldest individuals in the catch. In more typical thermally stratified lake systems lake trout and Arctic char usually move to colder, deeper water in summer. In the Ugashik lakes, however, both species were abundant in shallow water all summer. Prior to this study pygmy whitefish were undocumented in this system. The fish examined in the Ugashik lakes were opportunistic feeders, consuming organisms such as isopods and amphipods. Fish in the Ugashik lakes were found in locations different from what one would expect from predominant literature. Fisheries managers may need to take this into account
    [Show full text]
  • STOCK ASSESSMENT and BIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS of BURBOT in LAKES of INTERIOR ALASKA DURING 1986L
    STOCK ASSESSMENT AND BIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF BURBOT IN LAKES OF INTERIOR ALASKA DURING 1986l By James F. Parker Wilson D. Potterville and David R. Bernard December 1987 ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME Division of Sport Fish Juneau, Alaska 99802 ‘This investigation was partially financed by the Federal Aid in Sport Fish Restoration Act (16 U.S.C. 777-777K) under Project F-10-2, Job No. N-8-I. I TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES........................................................ii LIST OF FIGURES......................................................iii LIST OF APPENDICES....................................................iv ABSTRACT...............................................................l INTRODUCTION...........................................................2 METHODS................................................................4 Gear Description ............................................... ...4 Study Design ................................................... ...4 Estimation of Abundance ......................................... ..g Calculation of Mean CPUE........................................ ..g Age and Length...................................................ll RESULTS...............................................................ll Abundance........................................................l 1 Mean CPUE........................................................l5 Age and Length...................................................2 3 Big vs. Small Hoop Traps.........................................3
    [Show full text]