DOCSLIB.ORG

GFCA Front Matter.Vp

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
GFCA Front Matter.Vp Chapter1 “Wewillstayandfightitout...” TheStrategicSituationonthe AfternoonofJuly3,1863 Union Army of the Potomac under George G. Meade and The the Confederate Army of Northern Virginia under Robert E. Lee spent the first two days of July 1863 locked in titanic combat. The second day witnessed large scale Southern attacks against both ends of the Union line. James Longstreet’s massive assault smashed Dan Sickles’ Third Corps, wrecked additional brigades, and nearly collapsed Meade’s left flank. On his right, another attack swept across Rock Creek and up the wooded and rocky slopes of Culp’s Hill, where only hard fighting and good luck saved the Union defenders. The day produced combined casualties of more than 16,000 men and continued late into the night before finally sputtering out on theslopesof Culp’s Hill.1 By the end of the day, the Army of the Potomac held a shorter fishhook-shaped line anchored on high ground with the advantage of interior lines of communication. The prominent points on this line were Culp’s Hill and Cemetery Hill on the northern end, and Little Round Top and Big Round Top on the southern end. Between those hills ran a low ridge called 1 Edwin B. Coddington, The Gettysburg Campaign: A Study in Command (New York: CharlesScribner’sSons,1968),442. 2 Gettysburg’sForgottenCavalryActions Cemetery Ridge. Meade’s army had the advantage of holding a more compact line anchored on good terrain, but he was not convinced his army should stand and fight at Gettysburg for a third day. Meade, a military engineer by training and experience, preferred a formidable defensive line in MarylandalongthebanksofBigPipeCreek. About 9:00 p.m. on July 2, Meade convened a council of war with his two wing commanders, his seven corps commanders, his chief engineer, and his chief of staff. The Federal brass debated the merits of staying and fighting at Gettysburg versus retreating to the Pipe Creek line until Meade finally put it to a vote. The majority favored staying at Gettysburg. Accordingly, Meade resolved to “stay and fight it out.”2 He had fresh forces available to defend his line despite two days of heavy combat. Almost an entire infantry corps, the Sixth, was fresh; only one of its divisions had been engaged in the fighting on the second. Meade was confident that General Lee would resume the offensive the next day. The only question was where hewouldattack. For his part, Lee had indeed tested both Union flanks on the second and failed. Reasoning that Meade had shifted troops to his flanks to meet threats, Lee concluded that the Union center was weaker than it should be and resolved to attack it the next day using George Pickett’s fresh division of Virginians from Longstreet Corps, together with other troops. The attack would have to be made across a long gently undulating open field a mile wide against a position on higher and more commanding ground. In order to give his infantry a better chance of success, Lee ordered a massive artillery barrage before the attack to knock out the more potent Federal long-arm and demoralizethewaitingenemyinfantry. Unlike Meade’s army, Lee’s army held a long extended exterior line curved at both ends and roughly parallel to the Federal position. Lee had to weaken his flanks somewhat to support his grand attack on July 3 because of the heavy loses his army had suffered on July 1-2. In particular, he had largely stripped his right flank to support the infantry assault against the Federal center; only a small force of exhausted infantry was available to hold that flank, which made it vulnerable to being turned. Lee and his army of veteransfacedadifficulttaskasdawnbrokeonthemorningofJuly3. 2 Ibid.,453. TheStrategicSituationonAfternoonofJuly3,1863 3 TheStrategicSituationonthe AfternoonofJuly3,1863 *** Only July 2, when Longstreet was preparing his divisions to march and then launch his sledgehammer blow against the exposed Federal left on July 2, Brig. Gen. John Buford’s two tired and battered brigades of Federal cavalry rode off the battlefield at Gettysburg. Buford had orders to ride to Maryland to guard the Army of the Potomac’s wagon trains, which were at 4 Gettysburg’sForgottenCavalryActions that time near Taneytown. His departure meant there was no Federal cavalry on the southern part of the battlefield on July 2. Only Brig. Gen. David M. Gregg’s depleted Second Cavalry Division was near the battlefield, pinned down and battling Confederate infantry of the legendary Stonewall Brigade on Brinkerhoff’s Ridge, about two miles east of the main battlefield on the Hanover Road. As a result, there were no horsemen available to screen the Federal left flank and no good force available to gather intelligence about Southern dispositions on the morning of July 3. All of this would prove criticalinthecomingfight.3 BrigadierGeneralWesleyMerrittandhisRegulars On the evening of July 1, Buford faced Lt. Gen. A. P. Hill’s Confederate corps with only two-thirds of his division. To his great regret, one of his brigades, the Reserve (or Regular) Brigade, commanded by Brig. Gen. Wesley Merritt, had been detached to patrol the passes through the South Mountain range in Maryland several days before the beginning of the battle. The Reserve Brigade consisted of some of the best cavalrymen in any army of the Civil War. It had a nucleus of the four regiments of Regular Army cavalry attached to the Army of the Potomac (the 1st, 2nd, 5th, and 6th U.S., the latter a new regiment formed at the beginning of the war), along with the 6th Pennsylvania Cavalry, a fine volunteer regiment. It was no wonder that BufordregrettedlosingthisfinebrigadeonJuly1. The four Regular Army regiments had been used improperly during the early phases of the Civil War and were largely under-strength by the time of the battle of Gettysburg. The 6th Pennsylvania Cavalry (Rush’s Lancers) had done so well at the Brandy Station fight that Buford told Cavalry Corps commander Maj. Gen. Alfred Pleasonton, “These men did splendidly yesterday; I call them now the Seventh Regulars.” In fact, some Confederates believed the Lancers were in fact Regular cavalry. Writing many years later, George W. Watson of the 12th Virginia Cavalry actually 3 For the only detailed treatment of Gregg’s engagement with the Confederate infantry on Brinkerhoff’s Ridge, see Eric J. Wittenberg, Protecting the Flank: The Fights for Brinkerhoff’s Ridge and East Cavalry Field, Battle of Gettysburg, July 2-3, 1863 (Celina, Ohio:IroncladPublishing,2002;reprintedbySavasBeatie,Fall2011). TheStrategicSituationonAfternoonofJuly3,1863 5 Brig.Gen.WesleyMerritt,Commander,ReserveBrigade USAHEC referred to them as the Seventh Pennsylvania Regulars. The proud and well-disciplined professional men of the Reserve Brigade had borne the brunt of the 14-hour fight at Brandy Station on June 9, 1863, and a day of severe fighting at Upperville, Virginia, on June 21. By the time of 6 Gettysburg’sForgottenCavalryActions Gettysburg, the Reserve Brigade numbered 52 officers and 1,870 enlisted men.4 Twenty-nine year-old Wesley Merritt, a West Pointer who graduated 22nd out of 41 in the Class of 1860, commanded the Reserve Brigade. He was assigned to the 2nd Dragoons and served in John Buford’s company at Camp Floyd, Utah. After the outbreak of the Civil War, Merritt came east with the 2nd Dragoons, now known as the 2nd U.S. Cavalry, and served as aide-de-camp to Brig. Gen. Philip St. George Cooke, commander of the Army of the Potomac’s cavalry forces and the father-in-law of Confederate cavalry chieftain Maj. Gen. J. E. B. Stuart. Cooke, known as the father of the U.S. cavalry, wrote the official manual for cavalry field operations and was an outstanding role model for the young West Pointer. Merritt performed ably as Cooke’s aide and later served as ordnance officer under the Army of the Potomac’s first Cavalry Corps commander, Maj. Gen. George Stoneman. When Stoneman took medical leave after the Chancellorsville Campaign in the spring of 1863, Pleasonton assumed temporary command of the Cavalry Corps. Merritt took active command of the 2nd U.S. Cavalry aboutthesametime.5 Merritt performed conspicuously at Brandy Station and his courage and leadership skills caught Pleasonton’s eye. Buford, his former company commander, also praised him and, as one Regular noted, “in those days the praise of John Buford was more highly esteemed by the officers under his command than a brevet commission.” Merritt again distinguished himself at Upperville on June 21, and a couple of days later Pleasonton requested Merritt’s promotion to brigadier general. Pleasonton had been disappointed with the performance of the two officers who led the Army’s Regular Cavalry after John Buford was promoted to division command when 4 “Address of Col. Frederic C. Newhall,” included in Dedication of the Monument of the Sixth Penna. Cavalry on the Battlefield of Gettysburg (Philadelphia: privately published, 1889), 12-13; George William Watson, The Last Survivor, Brian Stuart Kesterson, ed. (Washington, WV: Night Hawk Press, 1993), 12; John W. Busey and David G. Martin, Regimental Strengths and Losses at Gettysburg (Hightstown, NJ: Longstreet House, 1982), 103. The regimental strengths are as follows: 1st U.S., 17 officers and 449 enlisted men; 2nd U.S., 5 officers and 505 enlisted men; 5th U.S., 11 officers and 567 enlisted men; 6th U.S., detached to Cavalry Corps headquarters; and 6th Pennsylvania Cavalry, 15 officers and349enlistedmen. 5 Ezra J. Warner, Generals in Blue: Lives of the Union Commanders (Baton Rouge: LouisianaStateUniversityPress,1964),321. TheStrategicSituationonAfternoonofJuly3,1863 7 Maj.Gen.AlfredPleasanton,Commander,CavalryCorps, ArmyofthePotomac LibraryofCongress 8 Gettysburg’sForgottenCavalryActions Stoneman left for his medical leave. The first, Maj. Charles J. Whiting, was relieved of command of the Reserve Brigade for allegedly treasonous conductfollowingBrandyStation.6 Whiting’s successor, Maj.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Donald Heald Rare Books a Selection of Rare Books
    Donald Heald Rare Books A Selection of Rare Books Donald Heald Rare Books A Selection of Rare Books Donald Heald Rare Books 124 East 74 Street New York, New York 10021 T: 212 · 744 · 3505 F: 212 · 628 · 7847 [email protected] www.donaldheald.com Fall 2015 Americana: Items 1 - 28 Travel and Cartography: Items 29 - 51 Natural History: Items 52 - 76 Color Plate & Illustrated: Items 77 - 91 Miscellany: Items 92 - 100 All purchases are subject to availability. All items are guaranteed as described. Any purchase may be returned for a full refund within ten working days as long as it is returned in the same condition and is packed and shipped correctly. The appropriate sales tax will be added for New York State residents. Payment via U.S. check drawn on a U.S. bank made payable to Donald A. Heald, wire transfer, bank draft, Paypal or by Visa, Mastercard, American Express or Discover cards. AMERICANA 1 [AFRICAN AMERICANA] - Worthington G. SNETHEN. The Black Code of the District of Columbia in Force September 1st, 1848. New York: The A[merican] and F[oreign] Anti-Slavery Society, 1848. 8vo (8 5/8 x 5 1/4 inches). 61, [1, blank], [1], [1, blank] pp. Ad leaf in rear. Expertly bound to style in half black morocco over period marbled paper covered boards. Rare printing of the antebellum laws relating to African Americans in Washington, D.C. The author, a Washington D.C. attorney and the former solicitor of the General Land Office, notes on an advertisement leaf in the rear that he has “nearly completed the Black Code of each of the States of the Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Battle-Of-Waynesboro
    Battlefield Waynesboro Driving Tour AREA AT WAR The Battle of Waynesboro Campaign Timeline 1864-1865: Jubal Early’s Last Stand Sheridan’s Road The dramatic Union victory at the Battle of Cedar Creek on October 19, 1864, had effectively ended to Petersburg Confederate control in the Valley. Confederate Gen. Jubal A. Early “occasionally came up to the front and Winchester barked, but there was no more bite in him,” as one Yankee put it. Early attempted a last offensive in mid- October 19, 1864 November 1864, but his weakened cavalry was defeated by Union Gen. Philip H. Sheridan’s cavalry at Kernstown Union Gen. Philip H. Sheridan Newtown (Stephens City) and Ninevah, forcing Early to withdraw. The Union cavalry now so defeats Confederate Gen. Jubal A. Early at Cedar Creek. overpowered his own that Early could no longer maneuver offensively. A Union reconnaissance Strasburg Front Royal was repulsed at Rude’s Hill on November 22, and a second Union cavalry raid was turned mid-November 1864 back at Lacey Spring on December 21, ending active operations for the winter season. Early’s weakened cavalry The winter was disastrous for the Confederate army, which was no longer able is defeated in skirmishes at to sustain itself on the produce of the Valley, which had been devastated by Newtown and Ninevah. the destruction of “The Burning.” Rebel cavalry and infantry were returned November 22, to Lee’s army at Petersburg or dispersed to feed and forage for themselves. 1864 Union cavalry repulsed in a small action at Rude’s Hill. Prelude to Battle Harrisonburg December 21, McDowell 1864 As the winter waned and spring approached, Confederates defeat Federals the Federals began to move.
    [Show full text]
  • Buford-Duke Family Album Collection, Circa 1860S (001PC)
    Buford-Duke Family Album Collection, circa 1860s (001PC) Photograph album, ca. 1860s, primarily made up of CDVs but includes four tintypes, in which almost all of the images are identified. Many of the persons identified are members of the Buford and Duke families but members of the Taylor and McDowell families are also present. There are also photographs of many Civil War generals and soldiers. Noted individuals include George Stoneman, William Price Sanders, Phillip St. George Cooke, Ambrose Burnside, Ethan Allen Hitchcock, George Gordon Meade, Napoleon Bonaparte Buford, George Brinton McClellan, Wesley Merritt, John Buford, Winfred Scott Hancock, John C. Fremont, Green Clay Smith, Basil Wilson Duke, Philip Swigert, John J. Crittenden and Davis Tillson. The photographs are in good condition but the album cover is coming apart and is in very poor condition and the album pages range from fair to good condition. A complete list of the identified persons is as follows: Buford-Duke, 1 Buford-Duke Family Album Collection, circa 1860s (001PC) Page 1: Page 4 (back page): Top Left - George Stoneman Captain Joseph O'Keefe (?) Top Right - Mrs. Stoneman Captain Myles W. Keogh (?) Bottom Left - William Price Sanders A. Hand Bottom Right Unidentified man Dr. E. W. H. Beck Page 1 (back page): Page 5: Mrs. Coolidge Mrs. John Buford Dr. Richard Coolidge John Buford Phillip St. George Cooke J. Duke Buford Mrs. Phillip St. George Cooke Watson Buford Page 2: Page 5 (back page): John Cooke Captain Theodore Bacon (?) Sallie Buford Bell Unidentified man Julia Cooke Fanny Graddy (sp?) Unidentified woman George Gordon Meade Page 2 (back page): Page 6: John Gibbon Unidentified woman Gibbon children D.
    [Show full text]
  • Sacred Ties: from West Point Brothers to Battlefield Rivals: a True Story of the American Civil War
    Civil War Book Review Summer 2010 Article 12 Sacred Ties: From West Point Brothers to Battlefield Rivals: A True Story of the American Civil War Wayne Wei-siang Hsieh Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/cwbr Recommended Citation Hsieh, Wayne Wei-siang (2010) "Sacred Ties: From West Point Brothers to Battlefield Rivals: A True Story of the American Civil War," Civil War Book Review: Vol. 12 : Iss. 3 . Available at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/cwbr/vol12/iss3/12 Hsieh: Sacred Ties: From West Point Brothers to Battlefield Rivals: A Tr Review Hsieh, Wayne Wei-siang Summer 2010 Carhart, Tom Sacred Ties: From West Point Brothers to Battlefield Rivals: A True Story of the American Civil War. Berkley Caliber, 978-0-425-23421-1 ISBN 978-0-425-23421-1 Bonds of Brotherhood Tom Carhart, himself a West Point graduate and twice-wounded Vietnam veteran, has written a new study of the famous West Point Classes of 1860 and 1861. Carhart chooses to focus on four notable graduates from the Classes of 1861 (Henry Algernon DuPont, John Pelham, Thomas Lafayette Rosser, and George Armstrong Custer), and two from the Class of 1860 (Wesley Merritt and Stephen Dodson Ramseur). Carhart focuses on the close bonds formed between these cadets at West Point, which persisted even after the division of both the nation and the antebellum U.S. Army officer corps during the Civil War. He starts his narrative with a shared (and illicit) drinking party at Benny’s Haven, a nearby tavern and bane of the humorless guardians of cadet discipline at what is sometimes now not-so-fondly described as the South Hudson Institute of Technology.
    [Show full text]
  • The Battle of Sailor's Creek
    THE BATTLE OF SAILOR’S CREEK: A STUDY IN LEADERSHIP A Thesis by CLOYD ALLEN SMITH JR. Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS December 2005 Major Subject: History THE BATTLE OF SAILOR’S CREEK: A STUDY IN LEADERSHIP A Thesis by CLOYD ALLEN SMITH JR. Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Approved by: Chair of Committee, Joseph Dawson Committee Members, James Bradford Joseph Cerami Head of Department, Walter L. Buenger December 2005 Major Subject: History iii ABSTRACT The Battle of Sailor’s Creek: A Study in Leadership. (December 2005) Cloyd Allen Smith Jr., B.A., Slippery Rock University Chair: Dr. Joseph Dawson The Battle of Sailor’s Creek, 6 April 1865, has been overshadowed by Lee’s surrender at Appomattox Court House several days later, yet it is an example of the Union military war machine reaching its apex of war making ability during the Civil War. Through Ulysses S. Grant’s leadership and that of his subordinates, the Union armies, specifically that of the Army of the Potomac, had been transformed into a highly motivated, organized and responsive tool of war, led by confident leaders who understood their commander’s intent and were able to execute on that intent with audacious initiative in the absence of further orders. After Robert E. Lee’s Army of Northern Virginia escaped from Petersburg and Richmond on 2 April 1865, Grant’s forces chased after Lee’s forces with the intent of destroying the mighty and once feared iv protector of the Confederate States in the hopes of bringing a swift end to the long war.
    [Show full text]
  • VOL. L, NO. 7 Michigan Regimental Round Table Newsletter—Page 1 August 2010
    VOL. L, NO. 7 Michigan Regimental Round Table Newsletter—Page 1 August 2010 On June 7, 1864, 9300 Federal horsemen under Major General Phil Sheridan traveled northwestward from their camps at Cold Harbor. Their orders were to join forces with Major General David Hunter advancing from the Shenandoah Valley, then destroy the Virginia Central Railroad and the James River Canal. For four days Sheridan led his troopers toward Trevilian Station, a freight and water stop on the vital Confederate railroad. While the Federals rode leisurely, Major General Wade Hampton pushed his 6400 Rebels to intercept this Federal menace. The two forces clashed about 5:00 A.M. on June 11, two miles northeast of the depot. Troops on both sides were ordered to dismount as the fighting took place among a tract of dense underbrush and trees. Fighting blindly in the thick growth caused confusion as many from both sides fired into their own men. Late in the morning Sheridan committed another division which smashed Hampton’s front. As many of Hampton’s men fled toward the depot, they were met by the “Wolverines” of George Armstrong Custer. Hampton’s incensed troopers charged, and a furious struggle ensued. From three sides Confederate reinforcements closed in on Custer’s beleaguered men for a number of hours in the stifling heat. Finally the Federals cracked a seam in the Confederate lines and escaped. The next morning Sheridan’s horsemen renewed the attack, and during the afternoon South Carolinians under Matthew Calbraith Butler repulsed seven separate attacks by General Wesley Merritt and Colonel Thomas C.
    [Show full text]
  • Gettysburg: Three Days of Glory Study Guide
    GETTYSBURG: THREE DAYS OF GLORY STUDY GUIDE CONFEDERATE AND UNION ORDERS OF BATTLE ABBREVIATIONS MILITARY RANK MG = Major General BG = Brigadier General Col = Colonel Ltc = Lieutenant Colonel Maj = Major Cpt = Captain Lt = Lieutenant Sgt = Sergeant CASUALTY DESIGNATION (w) = wounded (mw) = mortally wounded (k) = killed in action (c) = captured ARMY OF THE POTOMAC MG George G. Meade, Commanding GENERAL STAFF: (Selected Members) Chief of Staff: MG Daniel Butterfield Chief Quartermaster: BG Rufus Ingalls Chief of Artillery: BG Henry J. Hunt Medical Director: Maj Jonathan Letterman Chief of Engineers: BG Gouverneur K. Warren I CORPS MG John F. Reynolds (k) MG Abner Doubleday MG John Newton First Division - BG James S. Wadsworth 1st Brigade - BG Solomon Meredith (w) Col William W. Robinson 2nd Brigade - BG Lysander Cutler Second Division - BG John C. Robinson 1st Brigade - BG Gabriel R. Paul (w), Col Samuel H. Leonard (w), Col Adrian R. Root (w&c), Col Richard Coulter (w), Col Peter Lyle, Col Richard Coulter 2nd Brigade - BG Henry Baxter Third Division - MG Abner Doubleday, BG Thomas A. Rowley Gettysburg: Three Days of Glory Study Guide Page 1 1st Brigade - Col Chapman Biddle, BG Thomas A. Rowley, Col Chapman Biddle 2nd Brigade - Col Roy Stone (w), Col Langhorne Wister (w). Col Edmund L. Dana 3rd Brigade - BG George J. Stannard (w), Col Francis V. Randall Artillery Brigade - Col Charles S. Wainwright II CORPS MG Winfield S. Hancock (w) BG John Gibbon BG William Hays First Division - BG John C. Caldwell 1st Brigade - Col Edward E. Cross (mw), Col H. Boyd McKeen 2nd Brigade - Col Patrick Kelly 3rd Brigade - BG Samuel K.
    [Show full text]
  • Forrestine Cooper Hooker's Notes and Memoirs on Army Life in the West, 1871-1876, Arranged, Edited, and Annotated by Barbara E
    Forrestine Cooper Hooker's notes and memoirs on army life in the West, 1871-1876, arranged, edited, and annotated by Barbara E. Fisher Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Fisher, Barbara Esther, 1939- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 04/10/2021 03:17:15 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/551645 FORRESTINE COOPER HOOKER'S NOTES AND MEMOIRS ON ARMY LIFE IN THE WEST, 1871 - 18?6 arranged, edited, and annotated by Barbara E, Fisher A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1 9 6 3 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for an advanced degree at the University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. VLR Listed: 12/12/2019 1. Name of Property NRHP Listed: 8/7/2020 Historic name: Rose Hill Other names/site number: VDHR No. 023-0018 Name of related multiple property listings: The Civil War in Virginia, 1861–1865: Historic and Archaeological Resources (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing) ____________________________________________________________________________ 2. Location Street & number: 19202 Batna Road City or town: Culpeper State: VA County: Culpeper Not For Publication: N/A Vicinity: X ____________________________________________________________________________ 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this X nomination ___ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural
    [Show full text]
  • Course Reader
    Course Reader Gettysburg: History and Memory Professor Allen Guelzo The content of this reader is only for educational use in conjunction with the Gilder Lehrman Institute’s Teacher Seminar Program. Any unauthorized use, such as distributing, copying, modifying, displaying, transmitting, or reprinting, is strictly prohibited. GETTYSBURG in HISTORY and MEMORY DOCUMENTS and PAPERS A.R. Boteler, “Stonewall Jackson In Campaign Of 1862,” Southern Historical Society Papers 40 (September 1915) The Situation James Longstreet, “Lee in Pennsylvania,” in Annals of the War (Philadelphia, 1879) 1863 “Letter from Major-General Henry Heth,” SHSP 4 (September 1877) Lee to Jefferson Davis (June 10, 1863), in O.R., series one, 27 (pt 3) Richard Taylor, Destruction and Reconstruction: Personal Experiences of the Late War (Edinburgh, 1879) John S. Robson, How a One-Legged Rebel Lives: Reminiscences of the Civil War (Durham, NC, 1898) George H. Washburn, A Complete Military History and Record of the 108th Regiment N.Y. Vols., from 1862 to 1894 (Rochester, 1894) Thomas Hyde, Following the Greek Cross, or Memories of the Sixth Army Corps (Boston, 1894) Spencer Glasgow Welch to Cordelia Strother Welch (August 18, 1862), in A Confederate Surgeon’s Letters to His Wife (New York, 1911) The Armies The Road to Richmond: Civil War Memoirs of Major Abner R. Small of the Sixteenth Maine Volunteers, ed. H.A. Small (Berkeley, 1939) Mrs. Arabella M. Willson, Disaster, Struggle, Triumph: The Adventures of 1000 “Boys in Blue,” from August, 1862, until June, 1865 (Albany, 1870) John H. Rhodes, The History of Battery B, First Regiment Rhode Island Light Artillery, in the War to Preserve the Union (Providence, 1894) A Gallant Captain of the Civil War: Being the Record of the Extraordinary Adventures of Frederick Otto Baron von Fritsch, ed.
    [Show full text]
  • “OPEN WARFARE” DOCTRINE in the LIGHT of AMERICAN MILITARY HISTORY by Gene Fax
    National Archives ••• PERSHING’S “OPEN WARFARE” DOCTRINE IN THE LIGHT OF AMERICAN MILITARY HISTORY By Gene Fax n May 1917, John J. Pershing became the frst American general driving the enemy out into the open and engaging him in a war of Isince the Civil War to lead a feld army of more than a few movement.”2 Americans, he believed, were inherently superior to thousand men. For most of the intervening time, the U.S. Army the soldiers of other nations in their initiative and their aptitude had had three main missions: protecting the coasts, quelling labor for marksmanship.3 In his statement of training principles he unrest, and chasing—but rarely fighting—Indians.1 Pershing declared, “Te rife and the bayonet are the principal weapons of himself operated against Indians in the west, the Spanish in Cuba, the infantry soldier. He will be trained to a high degree of skill Moros in the Philippines, and Pancho Villa in Mexico. None of as a marksman both on the target range and in feld fring. An these prepared him or the Army for the all-consuming war then aggressive spirit must be developed until the soldier feels himself, going on in France. Pershing and the Army were largely unfamiliar as a bayonet fghter, invincible in battle.”4 with modern weapons, tactics, and logistics. Pershing himself had observed the Russo-Japanese War, the frst Yet Pershing knew how he wanted his new Army to fght. Te major confict to use modern weapons. In his reports he described trench-bound stalemate of the Western Front was not for him.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Styple, William B., Ed. Generals in Bronze: Interviewing the Commanders of the Civil War. Kearny, N.J.: Belle Grove Publis
    Styple, William B., ed. Generals in Bronze: Interviewing the Commanders of the Civil War. Kearny, N.J.: Belle Grove Publishing, 2005. Interview of Generals by sculptor, James Kelly Boyhood memories of the war, viiff New York, alcohol, viii=ix Lincoln’s reelection, ix-xi Fall of Richmond, Lincoln assassination, xi-xii Postwar life, xiiff Sheridan’s ride, xx Philip H. Sheridan, described, 1 Sword, Cedar Creek, 2-3 George A. Forsyth, Lee and Appomattox, 3-5 Grant, Sherman, 11 Sheridan at Cedar Creek, 11 Biographical background on Sheridan, 12ff Sherman, 18 Grant and Sherman, 22 Ely Samuel Parker, Overland campaign, Wilderness, Grant, Hancock, 23-25 Ely Samuel Parker, Appomattox, 25-27 Grant described, 30 Grant, James Harrison Wilson, swearing, 30 Shiloh, Grant, Sherman, 31 Grant, Lee, Appomattox, 31 Grant’s death and funeral, 35-37 John A. Logan described, Sherman, 38 Hooker described, 40 Peninsula campaign, Williamsburg, 40 Sickles, Meade, 41 Hooker on McClellan, 41 Stanton, 41 Hooker, Chancellorsville, 42-43 Rosecrans, alcohol, 43 Abner Doubleday, Fort Sumter, 45-47 John Gibbon, 47 McClellan, 47 Judson Kilpatrick, Hooker, 48-50, Jefferson C. Davis, Pea Ridge, 51, 55-56 Jefferson C. Davis, Sheridan, Cedar Creek, George Crook, Grant, 52 Winfield Scott Hancock, Gettysburg, 58-60 Sherman, 60 Jesse Reno, 60-61 Meade, Hancock, Warren, Gettysburg, Butterfield, Baldy Smith, 64-70 Daniel Butterfield, Gettysburg council of war, John Newton, Doubleday, Birney, Gibbon, Sickles, 71-80 Henry Slocum, Council of war at Gettysburg, 80-82 1 General Martin
    [Show full text]