Djvu Document

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Djvu Document INSECTA MUNDI, Vol. 10, Nos. 1-4, March - December, 1996 25 Hesperiidae ofcentral Rondonia, Brazil: Celaenorrhinus Hubner (Lepidoptera: Pyrginae), with descriptions ofthree new species and taxonomic comments Genr'ge T. Austin Nevada State Museum and Historical Society 700 Twin Lakes Drive, Las Vegas, Nevada 89107 and Stephen R. Steinhauser Allyn Museum of Entomology 3621 Bay Shore Road, Sarasota, Florida 34234 Abstract: Ellilit speCIes of Celaenorrhmus (Hesperlldae: Pyrltinae) occur near Cacaul4D.d1a m centralRontMma. BraZil. Three of these represent unnamed species and are described as new: Celaenorrhinus orneates Austin, Celaenorrhinus par SteinhauSeI' &Austin, and CelaeRorrhiRl/s aI/WeldOR SteinhauseI' &l·ustin. Themaleole salliais describedfOl'thefirsttime. Bothsexes ofall 8 speCIes (except female C. orneates) andtheir gemtaIiaare illustrated. Males of C. sauJa and C. orneates are similar to C. iao in lacking tibial tufts, modified thoracic scales, and abdominal pouches; C. autockton lacks tibial tufts and modified thoracic scales. This adds to the diversity ofsecondary sexual characters among New World Celaenorrhinus. The foUowingtax9.,treatedbyEvans(1952) assllbspecies, areraised tospecificrank C shemadi.jllnct'lsBe1J, 1940; C similisstola Evans, 1952; C. s£mllJ.8 appronmatus Williams & BeD, 1940; and C. similis biturcus Bell, 1934. Introduction Eight species of Celaenorrhinus were encoun­ tered during studies of butterfly diversity near Celaenorrhinus Hiibner, [1819] (Hesperiidae: Cacaulandia in central Rondonia, Brazil (for de- Pyrginae) is a diverse genus WIth a rarely encoun- scriptiOn Of thiS area see Emmel and Austin, 1990; teredpantropical distribution. Evans (1952) listed Austin et al., 1993). Three ofthese are new and are 14 Neotropieal species with an additional 12 sub named and described belm.v; the genitalia of all, species within the genus. Its limits were redefmed plus some allied species, are illustrated. Forewing by de Jong (1982), who synonymized the genera length is measUled from wing base to apex of Orneates Godman & Salvin, 1894 (which he mis- specimensfrom the Rondonia locality unless notE.!d spelled Orneatus) of the American Tropics and Structures of the genitalia are generally as out­ Charmion de NiCeville, 1894 Of Asia with C€laellOT lined by Steinhauser (1981), modified and correct rhinus, thus adding 2 additional Neotropical spe- ed (Steinhauser 1986), and with some additional eies. lIe also correctly placed a third Neotropical usages incorporated and discussed in the text be species, Plesioneura jao Mabille. 1889. in Celaenor- low. rhinus instead of in Autochton Hiibner, [1823], Where it had been placed by EVans (1952) Mielke Celaenorrhinus aegiochus (Hewitson) (1991) proposed a new name, Celaenorrhinus she­ (Figs. 41, 51) ma mercedensis, to replace Gelaenorrhinus shema son oensis Evans 1952 nee Draudt, 1922), a mis· Eudamus aegioehus Hewitson, 1876 . rnea es ae ioe us ewi son 0 man an , Salvin, 1894; Evans, 1952 saroma timor Evans, 1952 with Celaenorrhinus Celaenollhinu8 aegiochu8 (Hewitsoll, 1816). de Jong, songoensis Draudt, 1922. At this point, the genus 1982 contained 17 Neotropicalspecies with anadditIOnal 12 subspecies. We will add3new species, described C. aegiochus is not known from the Cacaulan- below, andraise four subspecies tofull speciesrank dia area; because ofits striking blue coloration, it resultingin a totalof24 species and 8 subspecies of needs no further description here We illustrate Neotropical Celaenorrhinus. the male gemtalia to show some detaIls lackmg m the Godman andSalvin (1879 1901) figure and the 26 Vol. 10, Nos. 1-4, March-December, 1996, INSECTA MUNDI female genitalia fO! comparison with other Celaen- tibiae with 2 pans, no tibial tuft 01 modified thorac- orrhinus taxa. ic scales; abdomen dark brown above, pale yellow with narrow central brown line beneath, no scent Celaenorrhinus savia (Evans) pouches (Figs. 1, 2, 6, 7, 89, 50) Genitalia: tegumen relatively long wIth small lateralventro caudallebes; uncus armsshort, widely Orneates savia Evans, 1952 spaced, and sli htl diver ent; nathos arms spic- e aenorr inus savia vans e on ,, = in ventr Iview' vinculum n Ie d with mm (21.3-23.9, N =3); forewing apex notproduced, termen nearIY straight, slightly convex towards costa, no costal fold; hindwing very slightly angu- late atvein OuAl, to!nus slightly pIOduced, dorsum dark: bIOwn, dull blue-gleen at extreme base of forewing, more extensive into discal cell on hind- wiilg; forewiilg with White hyaliiie macules as £01- lows: center ofdiscal cell, nearly square, excavate A distad, nearly straightproximad; CU1\ Cu... -'2' larg cesses; pems tu u ar, s g tty expande cau a , est (about 1.5xwidthofdiscalcellmacule), parallel- terminally bifurcate, phallobase sftOl't, slightly ofCu~-2A, ogram; upperportion elongate, more or curved dorsad' no cornutus. less tIimlgulro. distal edge in line with distal edge Female. i~ewil1glength 24.2, 24.8 lInll, veIy ofmacule in CuAl-CU~,these and short dashes in 5c-Rr and costal cell fOrm continuous (diVided by dark veins) but irregular centralband; base ofMa- extensive overscaling on hindwing; antenna! nu Cu~\, triangular, contiguous with distal edge of dum red-brown, 21 (N - I) or 22 (N - I) segments. discalcellmacule; alignedsubapicalin R -R , R -R , s 4 4 5 Genitalia:lamellapostvaginalisquadrate, cau- and RS-Ml' first smallest, last 2 slightly larger; mar~in sli~ht~ fringe brown Hindwing with costa gray-brown dal concave, ostium bursae well basad; very faint blackpostmedian andsubmedian bands; fringe White anteriOrlY, brown posteriOrly ra 0 e covermg muc of os mm ursae, ater Venter dark brown, blue-green on forewing at lebes membraneous, with lateral striations; an base ofeosta; forewing maeules repeatedfrom dol' trum poorly defmed; ductus bursae with caudal sum; wing base pale tan, anal margin narIOwly pOltion shOlt, stout, cephalad legion expanded gray-brown; pale tan distad to macule in Cu~-2A; leading to large, broadly oval corpus bursae, no hindwing with base lightly overscaled with pale tan, this with slightblue-greentinge as on dorsum; anal margin moderately overscaled with pale tan; discal cell with pale tanline at distal end; submar- gin withseriesofnarIOw paletanchC\'rons, distinct caudad, nearly obsolete cephalad. Head intense blue-green; palpi pale yellow be- neath and on outer surface, dorsal and inner snr- faces black withpale yellow behind 3rdsegment at , , row white at segments on interior surface, club with white on lower surface proximad, apiculus pale tan beneath, nudum gray, 19 (N 1) or 20 (N =2) segments; dorsal thorax blue-green cephalad becoming grayer caudad and laterad, sides gray- green, pectus pale yellow, legs brown to yellow- brown with many paler brown and yellowish hair­ likescales, midtibiae withsinglepairofspurs,hind INSECTA MUNDI, Vol. 10, Nos. 1-4, March - December, 1996 27 Evans (1952) described C. savia based upon a series of pale tan macules, these largest and most single female from Peru (Rio Cachiyaca, Iquitos). distinct posteriad. Males of this species lack tibial tufts, enlarged Headblue-greenwithpale graybetweenanten­ thoracic scales, and abdominalpouches, characters nae; pa1pi pa1eyellowbeneath andonoutersurface, whIch are nearly unIversal m the genus (de Jong, dorsal and mner surfaces dark gray; pale yellow 1982). Otherwise, however, C. savia resembles beneath and behind eyes; antennae black, indis severalNew Worldtaxaofthe genusinwingshape, tinct narrow white lines at segments on interior pattem, andgenitalia. Although deJong (1982) did surface, club with white onlower sUlfaceproximad, not specifically include C. savia when synonymiz- nudum gray, 20 segments (N = 1); dorsal thorax mg Orneates with Celaenorrhinus, it clearly does gray-green anteriad becoming grayer posteriad, belong in Celaenorrhinus ventralthoraxpaleyellow, sidesgrayish,legsbrown WIth many paler brown and yellOWIsh harr-like Celaenorrhinus orneates Austin. new seales, no tibial tuft or modified thOl'aeie seales; species (F'igs. 3, 8, 40) Genitalia:tegumenrelativelylongwith broad, Description. Male: fOl'ewing length 22.6 long, and caudally pointed ventro-caudal lobes; mm (holotype); forewing apex not produced, ter- uncus stout, arms short, not widely spaced; gna- men nearly straight, slightly Cffilvex towards costa, thos spIculose caudad, arms parallel, outer mar­ no costal fold; hindwing slightly angulate at vein gins expanded eephalad in ventralview; vineulum CuA}, tornus producedinto shortlobe; dorsum dark relativel~ strai~ht; saccus Ion:, strai~ht, and thin' brown; forewing with white hyaline macules as costaslig ltly cu,.vex, ampullaithpw nil1enthunl~ follows: center of discal cell, nearly square, con- before caudal process which is curved mesad at stIieted in middle distad and slightly so proximad; caudal end; harpe thm, pomted, slIghtlyexceedmg CuA}-Cu~, largest <about twice as wide as discal ampulla process in lateral view, bent mesad in cell macule), rectangular, uppel portion of CuA;­ dorsal VIew and outSIde of ampulla process; juxta 2A, small, more or less quadrate, distal edge ap- well de--,,'eloped, ofmoderate length with triangular proximately in line with distal edge of macule in caudal ro'ections on each side these s inose on } , , , costal cell form continuous (divided by dark veins) flared slightly at caudal endrather than bifurcate, but irregular centralband; base ofMg GuAI , eireu phallobase curved dorsad, no cornutus. lar, at anterio-distal corner of macule in CuA}- Female: unknown. CuA;;, well separated
Recommended publications
  • Issn 0972- 1800
    ISSN 0972- 1800 VOLUME 22, NO. 4 QUARTERL Y OCTOBER-DECEMBER, 2020 Date of Publication: 19th February, 2021 BIONOTES A Quarterly Newsletter for Research Notes and News On Any Aspect Related with Life Forms BIONOTES articles are abstracted/indexed/available in the Indian Science Abstracts, INSDOC; Zoological Record; Thomson Reuters (U.S.A); CAB International (U.K.); The Natural History Museum Library & Archives, London: Library Naturkundemuseum, Erfurt (Germany) etc. and online databases. Founder Editor Dr. R. K. Varshney, Aligarh, India Manuscripts Please E-mail to [email protected]. Board of Editors Guidelines for Authors Peter Smetacek, Butterfly Research Centre, Bhimtal, BIONOTES publishes short notes on any India aspect of biology. Usually submissions are [email protected] reviewed by one or two reviewers. Kindly submit a manuscript after studying the V.V. Ramamurthy, New Delhi, India format used in this journal [email protected] (http://www.entosocindia.org/). Editor reserves the right to reject articles that do not Zdenek F. Fric, Biology Centre, Czech Academy of adhere to our format. Please provide a contact Sciences, Institute of Entomology, Branisovska 31, telephone number. Authors will be provided CZ-37005 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic. with a pdf file of their publication. [email protected]. Address for Correspondence Stefan Naumann, Berlin, Germany Butterfly Research Centre, Bhimtal, [email protected] Uttarakhand 263 136, India. Phone: +91 R.C. Kendrick, Hong Kong SAR 8938896403. [email protected] Email: [email protected] Publication Policy Information, statements or findings published are the views of its author/ source only. From Volume 21 Published by the Entomological Society of India (ESI), New Delhi (Nodal Officer: V.V.
    [Show full text]
  • (Lepidoptera) Europe PMC Funders Group
    Europe PMC Funders Group Author Manuscript J Res Lepid. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2015 April 29. Published in final edited form as: J Res Lepid. 2014 December 1; 47: 65–71. Europe PMC Funders Author Manuscripts Evolution of extreme proboscis lengths in Neotropical Hesperiidae (Lepidoptera) J. A.-S. Bauder*,1, A. D. Warren2, and H. W. Krenn1 1Department of Integrative Zoology, University of Vienna, Althanstraße 14, A-1090 Vienna, Austria 2McGuire Center for Lepidoptera and Biodiversity, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, U.S.A. Abstract Exaggerated morphologies have evolved in insects as adaptations to nectar feeding by natural selection. For example, the suctorial mouthparts of butterflies enable these insects to gain access to floral nectar concealed inside deep floral tubes. Proboscis length in Lepidoptera is known to scale with body size, but whether extreme absolute proboscis lengths of nectar feeding butterflies result from a proportional or disproportional increase with body size that differs between phylogenetic lineages remains unknown. We surveyed the range of variation that occurs in scaling relationships between proboscis length and body size against a phylogenetic background among Costa Rican Hesperiidae. We obtained a new record holder for the longest proboscis in butterflies and showed that extremely long proboscides evolved at least three times independently within Europe PMC Funders Author Manuscripts Neotropical Hesperiidae. We conclude that the evolution of extremely long proboscides results from allometric scaling with body size, as demonstrated in hawk moths. We hypothesize that constraints on the evolution of increasingly long butterfly proboscides may come from (1) the underlying scaling relationships, i.e., relative proboscis length, combined with the butterfly’s flight style and flower-visiting behaviour and/or (2) developmental constraints during the pupal phase.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ecological Role of Extremely Long-Proboscid Neotropical Butterflies (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae) in Plant-Pollinator Networks
    Arthropod-Plant Interactions DOI 10.1007/s11829-015-9379-7 ORIGINAL PAPER The ecological role of extremely long-proboscid Neotropical butterflies (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae) in plant-pollinator networks 1 2 1 J. A.-S. Bauder • A. D. Warren • H. W. Krenn Received: 30 August 2014 / Accepted: 8 April 2015 Ó The Author(s) 2015. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Extremely long proboscides of insect flower Introduction visitors have been regarded as an example of a coevolu- tionary arms race, assuming that these insects act as effi- Many scientists have pondered over the evolutionary pro- cient pollinators for their nectar host plants. However, the cesses that led to the development of particularly elongate effect of proboscis length on generalized or specialized proboscides in flower-visiting insects (Darwin 1862; flower use remains unclear and the efficiency of butterfly Johnson 1997; Johnson and Anderson 2010; Muchhala and pollination is ambiguous. Neotropical Hesperiidae feature a Thomson 2009; Nilsson 1988, 1998; Pauw et al. 2009; surprising variation of proboscis length, which makes them Rodrı´guez-Girone´s and Llandres 2008; Rodrı´guez-Girone´s a suitable study system to elucidate the role of extremely and Santamarı´a 2007; Wasserthal 1997, 1998; Whittall and long-proboscid insects in plant-pollinator networks. The Hodges 2007). The most widely accepted hypothesis for results of this study show that skippers with longer pro- the evolution of extreme mouthpart lengths is that they boscides visit plant species with deep-tubed flowers to take coevolved with long nectar spurs of angiosperms. In this up food, but do not pollinate them.
    [Show full text]
  • Issn 0972- 1800
    ISSN 0972- 1800 VOLUME 22, NO. 3 QUARTERLY JULY-SEPTEMBER, 2020 Date of Publication: 28th September, 2020 BIONOTES A Quarterly Newsletter for Research Notes and News On Any Aspect Related with Life Forms BIONOTES articles are abstracted/indexed/available in the Indian Science Abstracts, INSDOC; Zoological Record; Thomson Reuters (U.S.A); CAB International (U.K.); The Natural History Museum Library & Archives, London: Library Naturkundemuseum, Erfurt (Germany) etc. and online databases. Founder Editor Manuscripts Dr. R. K. Varshney, Aligarh, India Please E-mail to [email protected]. Board of Editors Guidelines for Authors Peter Smetacek, Bhimtal, India BIONOTES publishes short notes on any aspect of biology. Usually submissions are V.V. Ramamurthy, New Delhi, India reviewed by one or two reviewers. Jean Haxaire, Laplune, France Kindly submit a manuscript after studying the format used in this journal Vernon Antoine Brou, Jr., Abita Springs, (http://www.entosocindia.org/). Editor U.S.A. reserves the right to reject articles that do not Zdenek F. Fric, Ceske Budejovice, Czech adhere to our format. Please provide a contact Republic telephone number. Authors will be provided Stefan Naumann, Berlin, Germany with a pdf file of their publication. R.C. Kendrick, Hong Kong SAR Address for Correspondence Publication Policy Butterfly Research Centre, Bhimtal, Information, statements or findings Uttarakhand 263 136, India. Phone: +91 published are the views of its author/ source 8938896403. only. Email: [email protected] From Volume 21 Published by the Entomological Society of India (ESI), New Delhi (Nodal Officer: V.V. Ramamurthy, ESI, New Delhi) And Butterfly Research Centre, Bhimtal Executive Editor: Peter Smetacek Assistant Editor: Shristee Panthee Butterfly Research Trust, Bhimtal Published by Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    PLATINUM The Journal of Threatened Taxa (JoTT) is dedicated to building evidence for conservaton globally by publishing peer-reviewed artcles online OPEN ACCESS every month at a reasonably rapid rate at www.threatenedtaxa.org. All artcles published in JoTT are registered under Creatve Commons Atributon 4.0 Internatonal License unless otherwise mentoned. JoTT allows allows unrestricted use, reproducton, and distributon of artcles in any medium by providing adequate credit to the author(s) and the source of publicaton. Journal of Threatened Taxa Building evidence for conservaton globally www.threatenedtaxa.org ISSN 0974-7907 (Online) | ISSN 0974-7893 (Print) Communication Butterflies of the myristica swamp forests of Shendurney Wildlife Sanctuary in the southern Western Ghats, Kerala, India Prabhakaran Chandrika Sujitha, Gopal Prasad & Kalesh Sadasivan 26 February 2019 | Vol. 11 | No. 3 | Pages: 13320–13333 DOI: 10.11609/jot.4399.11.3.13320-13333 For Focus, Scope, Aims, Policies, and Guidelines visit htps://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/about/editorialPolicies#custom-0 For Artcle Submission Guidelines, visit htps://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/about/submissions#onlineSubmissions For Policies against Scientfc Misconduct, visit htps://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/about/editorialPolicies#custom-2 For reprints, contact <[email protected]> The opinions expressed by the authors do not refect the views of the Journal of Threatened Taxa, Wildlife Informaton Liaison Development Society, Zoo Outreach Organizaton, or any of the
    [Show full text]
  • Larval Host Plants of the Butterflies of the Western Ghats, India
    OPEN ACCESS The Journal of Threatened Taxa is dedicated to building evidence for conservaton globally by publishing peer-reviewed artcles online every month at a reasonably rapid rate at www.threatenedtaxa.org. All artcles published in JoTT are registered under Creatve Commons Atributon 4.0 Internatonal License unless otherwise mentoned. JoTT allows unrestricted use of artcles in any medium, reproducton, and distributon by providing adequate credit to the authors and the source of publicaton. Journal of Threatened Taxa Building evidence for conservaton globally www.threatenedtaxa.org ISSN 0974-7907 (Online) | ISSN 0974-7893 (Print) Monograph Larval host plants of the butterflies of the Western Ghats, India Ravikanthachari Nitn, V.C. Balakrishnan, Paresh V. Churi, S. Kalesh, Satya Prakash & Krushnamegh Kunte 10 April 2018 | Vol. 10 | No. 4 | Pages: 11495–11550 10.11609/jot.3104.10.4.11495-11550 For Focus, Scope, Aims, Policies and Guidelines visit htp://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/about/editorialPolicies#custom-0 For Artcle Submission Guidelines visit htp://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/about/submissions#onlineSubmissions For Policies against Scientfc Misconduct visit htp://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/about/editorialPolicies#custom-2 For reprints contact <[email protected]> Threatened Taxa Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 10 April 2018 | 10(4): 11495–11550 Larval host plants of the butterflies of the Western Ghats, Monograph India Ravikanthachari Nitn 1, V.C. Balakrishnan 2, Paresh V. Churi 3,
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies in Ologbo Forest
    BUTTERFLIES IN OLOGBO FOREST Dr. Oskar Brattström [email protected] Survey efforts and methodology This survey combines data from tree visits to Ologbo. Initially Robert Warren made a two day survey 8-9 June 2006 and this brief visit produced a number of interesting records. I made a preliminary visit 27-31 October 2008 to asses if the area had potential for future butterfly studies. The result from these two shorter was promising and I therefore returned 22 March – 2 April 2009 to make a more detailed study. The main survey efforts have been concentrated two the South and North-west parts of the Ologbo Forest. Butterflies were captured using hand netting (most days between 09:30-14:00) and banana/pineapple baited traps, in most cases traps were left in the field over nights and re-baited at regular intervals. Captured specimens were either identified immediately in the field or brought back for later identification. There are still a large number of specimens waiting identification. Some species were also indentified on the wings when capture was not possible. One day was spent in the plantation itself (South of the Dura Club) to get an idea of what species of butterflies are present in an area with fully matured oil palms some distance away from a semi-natural forest. In this area only hand netting and visual observation was used, as the typical canopy species which can often only be recorded using traps hardly occur in this type habitat. In general it was very easy to detect and identify butterflies in this more open type of habitat and most of the species were well known savannah butterflies.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera of North America 4
    Lepidoptera of North America 4. Scientific Names List for Butterfly Species of North America, north of Mexico Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Lepidoptera of North America. 4. Scientific Names List for Butterfly Species of North America, north of Mexico by Paul A. Opler Department of Bioagricultural Sciences Colorado State University · Fort Collins, CO 80523 [email protected] Research Associate, Department of Entomology Smithsonian Institution Washington, D.C. 20560 and Andrew D. Warren Department of Entomology Oregon State University Corvallis, OR 97331 [email protected] Research Associate, Museo de Zoologia Facultad de Ciencias Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico Apdo. Postal 70-399, Mexico, D.F. 04510 Mexico November 10, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University This list generally follows the order found in the Miller and Brown (1981) Catalogue/Checklist of the Butterflies ofNorth America and the supplement to that list by Ferris (1989c), both published as Memoirs of the Lepidopterists' Society. Generic name usage is conservative (when opinions vary on how to divide monophyletic groups) and generally follows that used in A Field Guide to Eastern Butterflies (Opler 1992, 1998), A Field Guide to Western Butterflies (Opler 1999) and the Stanford and Opler (1993) Atlas to Western USA Butterflies (updated as Opler et al. 2000). Some changes are made to conform with recent research results (e.g. Emmel 1998) and with Palaearctic and Neotropical publications (see References). The list that follows includes superfamily, family, and subfamily categories (with tribes for some Lycaenidae), generally in accord with the arrangement presented by de Jong et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist
    Butterflies of India – Annotated Checklist By Paul Van Gasse (Kruibeke, Belgium; Email: [email protected]), Aug. 2013. Family Hesperiidae Subfamily Coeliadinae 1. Burara oedipodea (Branded Orange Awlet) B.o.ataphus: Sri Lanka. NR – Ceylon 17 B.o.belesis: Kangra to Arunachal, NE India, and Burma to Dawnas (= aegina, athena) – NW Himalayas (Kangra-Kumaon) 11, Sikkim 30, Bhutan 2, Assam 28, Burma (to Dawnas) 9 B.o.oedipodea: Probably S Burma. [Given as Ismene oedipodea in Evans, 1932, and as Bibasis oedipodea in Evans, 1949] 2. Burara tuckeri (Tucker’s Awlet) Burma in Tavoy. VR – Tavoy 1 [Given as Ismene tuckeri in Evans, 1932, and as Bibasis tuckeri in Evans, 1949] 3. Burara jaina (Orange Awlet) B.j.fergusonii: SW India to N Maharashtra. NR – S India 33 B.j.jaina: HP (Solan) and Garhwal to Arunachal, NE India, and Burma to Karens. NR (= vasundhara) – NW Himalayas (Dun-Kumaon) 3, Sikkim 18, Assam 37, Burma (Karens) 1 B.j.margana: Burma in Dawnas. R – Burma (Dawnas) 8 B.j.astigmata: S Andamans. VR – Andamans 3 [Given as Ismene jaina in Evans, 1932, and vasundhara was there given as the subspecies ranging from Assam to Karens, with jaina then confined to Mussoorie to Sikkim; given as Bibasis jaina in Evans, 1949] 4. Burara anadi (Plain Orange Awlet) Garhwal to NE India and Burma to Karens. R (= purpurea) – Mussoorie 1, Sikkim 13, Assam 1, Burma (Karens) 5 [Given as Ismene anadi in Evans, 1932, and as Bibasis anadi in Evans, 1949] 5. Burara etelka (Great Orange Awlet) NE India (Kabaw Valley in Manipur).
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary Checklist of Butterflies Recorded from Jeypore-Dehing Forest, Eastern Assam, India
    Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 February 2013 | 5(2): 3684–3696 Note A preliminary checklist of butterflies lowland tropical forests left in Upper recorded from Jeypore-Dehing forest, Assam (Image 1). JRF falls under eastern Assam, India the Eastern Himalayan biodiversity hotspot. The reserve forest lies in ISSN Monsoon Jyoti Gogoi the foothills of the Patkai range and Online 0974-7907 Print 0974-7893 Bokakhat East Dagaon, Golaghat District, Assam 785612, India the terrain is characterized by the [email protected] undulating hill ranges of Arunachal oPEN ACCESS Pradesh meeting the plains of the Assam Valley. The reserve has a passage through it, Jeypore Reserve Forest (JRF) is one of the few leading to Deomali and Khonsa in Arunachal Pradesh remaining continuous stretches of woodland left in (Image 2). The river Burhi-Dehing flows through the upper Assam. The forest lies just inside the south bank northern boundary of the reserve forest and Dilli River of the Brahmaputra River Basin, which is the barrier flowing through Namrup lying at an elevation of 124m is for many dispersal limited Malayan flora and fauna. the southern boundary of the reserve. The vegetation The reserve forest further lies in the foothills of Patkai- is characterized by Dipterocarpus marcocarpus, Messua Bum hill ranges of Arunachal Pradesh which is likely to ferrea and Vatica lanceafoliafrom the top canopy to the influence the bio-geographic pattern of many Malayan middle. The ground floor is dominated by Saprosma butterflies in northeastern India. Despite the bio- ternatum, Livistonia jenkiansiana and Calamus erectus geographic significance of the area, the area remains etc.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Philippine Butterflies
    LIST OF PHILIPPINE BUTTERFLIES • Abisara kausambi • Appias waltraudae • Athyma selenophora - Staff • Abisara mindanaensis • Araotes lapithis Sergeant • Abisara saturata • Araotes perrhaebis • Athyma separata • Acerbas anthea • Arhopala abseus • Athyma speciosa • Acerbas duris • Arhopala aedias • Athyma venata • Acherontia lachesis • Arhopala agesilaus • Atrophaneura atropos • Achillides chikae • Arhopala agrata • Atrophaneura schadenbergi • Achillides daedalus • Arhopala alaconia • Atrophaneura semperi • Achillides karna • Arhopala alesia • Attacus caesar • Achillides pericles • Arhopala alitaceus • Attacus lemairei • Acrophtalmia albofasciata • Arhopala allata • Attacus lorquini • Acrophtalmia artemis • Arhopala amphimuta • Badamia exclamationis - Brown • Acrophtalmia leto • Arhopala anamuta Awl • Acrophtalmia luzonica • Arhopala annulata • Baoris oceia - Paintbrush Swift • Acrophtalmia yamashitai • Arhopala anthelus • Bassarona dunya • Actias philippinica • Arhopala aroa • Bassarona piratica • Actias selene • Arhopala aronya • Bassarona teuta • Acytolepis puspa - Common • Arhopala arsenius • Belenois java Hedge Blue • Arhopala atosia • Bibasis etelka • Acytolepis tagalica • Arhopala avatha • Bibasis gomata - Pale Awlet • Aeromachus musca • Arhopala birmana: - Burmese • Bibasis harisa • Aeromachus plumbeola Bushblue • Bibasis oedipodea - Orange • Agatasa chrysodonia • Arhopala chamaeleona Awlet • Allotinus albatus • Arhopala corinda • Bibasis sena • Allotinus corbeti • Arhopala epimete • Bindahara phocides • Allotinus fallax • Arhopala
    [Show full text]
  • The Hesperiidae (Lepidoptera) of the Philippines
    The Hesperiidae (Lepidoptera) of the Philippines R. de Jong & C.G. Treadaway Jong, R. de, & C.G. Treadaway. The Hesperiidae (Lepidoptera) of the Philippines. Zool. Verh. Leiden 288,30.X.1993:1-125, figs. 1-139. — ISSN 0024-1652/ISBN 90-73239-19-2. Key words: Lepidoptera; Hesperiidae; Philippines; biogeography. All species and subspecies of the Hesperiidae known from the Philippines are listed and their distri• bution across the islands, preferred habitats and flight habits are indicated. By far the richest habitat is the primary lowland forest. In view of the high rate of deforestation it is estimated that 50% of the hesperiid species is endangered and may become extinct over the next 10 to 15 years. With 151 species the Philippines is considerably poorer than Borneo (214 species), but much richer than Sulawesi (84 species). In terms of endemicity, however, the Philippines is with 35 endemic species (23.2%) relatively much rich• er than Borneo (12 species, 5.6%), and almost as rich as Sulawesi (20 species, 23.8%). The distribution and endemicity of species and subspecies are analysed and compared with what is known of the geological history of the Philippines. It is concluded that the fauna is relatively young and essentially of Bornean derivation. The faunal connections with Sulawesi are ambiguous, and those with Taiwan very weak. Hie Hesperiidae do not provide patterns of vicariant speciation events in the Philippines, but there is a gener• al north-south (Luzon-Mindanao) differentiation with an intermediate area of islands showing intricate and various biogeographic links. This agrees with the geological history: the islands of the Philippines are not the result of fragmentation of a single land mass (such a fragmentation could have been a vicariant speciation event), and most of the present-day islands apparently emerged from the sea and may have been much further apart rather than closer together in the geological past.
    [Show full text]