DOCSLIB.ORG

The Roman Republic By: Jacob, Jackson, Insiya, Logan the Legendary Founding of Rome

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Roman Republic By: Jacob, Jackson, Insiya, Logan the Legendary Founding of Rome The Roman Republic By: Jacob, Jackson, Insiya, Logan The Legendary Founding of Rome • According to legends, the ancient city was founded by two brothers named Romulus and Remus. • In an argument over the city name (or possibly location) Romulus killed Remus and named the city after himself. • Another theory says the city is named after a woman, Roma, who traveled with Aeneas and other survivors of the Trojan war. • The men wanted to continue past the Tiber River, but Roma objected, and she teamed up with other women in the group to burn the Trojan ships and start a new settlement on the banks of the Tiber. Etruscan Rule • Shortly before 600 BC Rome was conquered by several Etruscan princes from across the Tiber River. • Tarquinius Priscus, the first of the Etruscan kings, drained the city's marshes. He improved the Forum, which was the commercial and political center of the town • Under Servius Tullius, the second Etruscan king, a treaty was made with the Latin cities which acknowledged Rome as the head of all Latium. • The last of the kings of Rome, Tarquinius Superbus, was a tyrant who opposed the people. He scorned religion. • Under the rule of the Etruscans Rome grew in importance and power. Great temples and impressive public works were constructed. • Trade prospered, and by the end of the 6th century BC. Rome had become the largest and richest city in Italy. Etruscan Rule Continued... • Under the Etruscan Kings, Roman society was divided into two classes - Patricians - Plebeians • The Patricians class controlled most of the land, held important offices, and advised the Etruscan king. • The Plebeian class was made up of peasants, laborers, and craftsmen. • The Plebeians made up 95% of Rome's population. 509 BCE Creation of Republic • In 509 BCE, the Romans overthrew the 7th king of Rome, Lucius Tarquinius Superbus, a tyrant king • Romans established a republic, a government in which citizens vote on representatives (not the same as a democracy.) • Important changes and innovations in the new government were a result of a political struggle between two groups • The Patricians were a group of wealthy families who were the only citizens with any legal or political power. • The Plebians were families that were equally wealthy but had no political authority • This inequality would lead to the well-formed republic that kept Rome strong for hundreds of years. Military Organization • The two consuls were primarily generals whose task it was to lead Rome’s armies in war. • In times of military emergency, when unity of command was sometimes necessary, Rome appointed a dictator in place of the consuls. • But they could not hold supreme military command for longer than six months. • During the republic there were two different popular assemblies, the centuriate assembly and the tribal assembly. • The centuriate assembly was military in nature; it voted on war and peace and elected all those magistrates who exercised imperium. (military power). Elected Officials/ System of Checks and Balances • Ancient Rome, from its start was ruled by kings. Some of these tyrant kings were harsh and unyielding which led to the Ancient Romans overthrowing them and starting a new government called the Republic. • This new republic gave shared power among those elected; however, some Ancient Romans feared that even these politicians might become too powerful and wanted to do something about it. • To ease these fears, citizens with high authority were allowed to have only limited terms. An example of this would be limiting consuls to only hold office for one year. • The Ancient Romans also kept balance by giving government officials the ability to restrict powers of other officials. This was carried out by one official stalling or vetoing the actions of the other. Elected Officials/ System of Checks and Balances Continued... • Laws were proposed by the Senate and approved by the magistrates. • Once a law was approved by the magistrates it had to be approved by the assemblies. • These checks and balances helped to equalize the three sections of government, but was still not completely reliable. The Rivalry of Carthage • Rivalry of Carthage • The rivalry started because Carthage and Rome were both competing for naval, political, and military power over the Mediterranean sea. • The Rivalry of Carthage was a string of wars known as the Punic wars and it was fought between Rome and Carthage. • Most of the Punic wars were fought in Carthage and in the Iberian Peninsula. The First Punic War • Also known as first Carthaginian war • Fought for control of the strategic islands of Corsica and Sicily • Took place between 264 and 241 B.C.E. • Started when Carthaginians intervened in a dispute between 2 main cities on the Sicilian east coast, establishing a presence on Sicily • Roman attacks in 260 forced Carthage off the island and opened the way to Corsica • Rome then made it to Africa in 256 and tried to force Carthage to surrender but terms were too harsh • Carthage drove Rome out of Africa in 255 • Battle for Sicily continued until 241 when Rome established total control over the island Second Punic War • Carthage was forced to pay large sums of money to Rome after first war • Took place between 219 and 202 B.C.E. • War began again after Carthage acquired a base in Spain • Hannibal led Carthaginian army over the alps into northern Italy In 218 • In 217, with Gallic support, Hannibal marched south and had several victories in southern including taking the second largest Roman city Capua. However, Hannibal refused to march on Rome • Rome then fought back but remained in a stalemate until 211, when they recaptured Capua • In 207, Carthaginian reinforcements arrived and an assault on Rome started • Gaius Nero launched an assault on the Carthage army and defeated them, forcing them out of Italy in 203 • Earlier on in 206, Roman general Scipio won a major battle at Illipa and forced Carthage out of Spain • Scipio then sailed to Africa and beat the Carthaginian army, forcing Carthage to surrender its navy, give up Spain and Mediterranean islands, and pay indemnity Threat of Hannibal During Second War • Hannibal proved a huge threat to Rome • He captured multiple cities including Rome's second largest • He beat a large Roman force at Cannae • Hannibal won several other battles over much of southern Italy Third Punic War • The third Punic war was fought between 149 and 146 B.C.E. • The reason this war started was because every Roman hated Carthage. • Carthage was obliterated by Rome. • Carthage was forced to be demilitarized in the peace treaty, this ended the Punic wars. • The Twelve Tables is the earliest Roman attempt at creating a collection of laws with set punishments, formed the basis of all Roman law. • It is the earliest surviving literature from the Roman empire • Composed by a group of ten men (455 BCE) • These twelve tablets were Primary Source: "The Twelve engraved and hung in the Tables" Forum S.O.A.P.S Tone Analysis • Speaker: ten Roman men from both the Patricians and the Plebians composed this collection of laws. • Occasion: this piece of Roman literature was written down around 455 BCE, around the beginning of the Roman empire • Audience: The audience of this work of literature is the people living in Rome; the people who these laws apply to, for example, there are laws written about slaves and owners that specifically apply them, among other people and classes. • Purpose: the purpose of this document is to inform citizens of Rome what actions are illegal and what those consequences are. • Subject: The main idea of the Twelve Tables are that if someone does something not socially acceptable, there will be consequences; this is also a deterrent of crime, to try to keep people in order. • Tone: the authors from ancient Rome have a very formal tone, possibly to show the seriousness of the laws and consequences. Works Cited Britannica, The Editors of Encyclopaedia. “First Punic War.” EncyclopædiaBritannica, Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc., 3 Mar. 2017, www.britannica.com/event/First-Punic-War. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/bb/Schlacht_bei_Zama_Gemälde_H_P_Motte.jpg http://www.answers.com/Q/What_led_to_the_rivalry_between_Carthage_and_Rome_in_the_Punic_Wars Britannica, The Editors of Encyclopaedia. “Second Punic War.” Encyclopædia Britannica, Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc., 24 July 2014, www.britannica.com/event/Second-Punic-War. https://www.ancient.eu/Third_Punic_War/ http://www.empirerome.com/wordpress/?page_id=222 http://www.thelatinlibrary.com/historians/narrative/romanhistory.html Primary Source: http://www.csun.edu/~hcfll004/12tables.html.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fractures: Political Identity in the Fall of the Roman Republic by Juan De
    Fractures: Political Identity in the Fall of the Roman Republic by Juan De Dios Vela III, B.A. A Thesis In History Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS Approved Dr. Gary Edward Forsythe Chair of Committee Dr. John McDonald Howe Mark Sheridan Dean of the Graduate School August, 2019 Copyright 2019, Juan De Dios Vela Texas Tech University, Juan De Dios Vela III, August 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................................... iii INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 1 CHAPTER I: FOUNDATIONS..................................................................................... 13 Part one: Political Institutions ..................................................................................... 13 Part Two: Citizens, Latins, Colonies and the Social Web .................................... 23 Part Three: Magistrates and Local Control ........................................................... 26 Part Four: Patrons and Clients .................................................................................... 28 CHAPTER II: THE FIRST CRACKS ......................................................................... 32 The Gracchan Seditions ....................................................................................... 32 Impotent Interlopers ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • University of Cincinnati
    UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI Date: 11-09-2006 I, Mark Andrew Atwood, hereby submit this work as part of the requirements for the degree of: Master of Arts in: The Department of Classics It is entitled: Trajan’s Column: The Construction of Trajan’s Sepulcher in Urbe This work and its defense approved by: Chair: Peter van Minnen William Johnson Trajan’s Column: The Construction of Trajan’s Sepulcher in Urbe A thesis submitted to the Division of Research and Advanced Studies of the University of Cincinnati In partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of Classics of the College of Arts and Sciences 2006 By MARK ANDREW ATWOOD B.A., University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 2004 Committee Chair: Dr. Peter van Minnen Abstract Eutropius (8.5.2) and Dio (69.2.3) record that after Trajan’s death in A.D. 117, his cremated remains were deposited in the pedestal of his column, a fact supported by archeological evidence. The Column of Trajan was located in urbe. Burial in urbe was prohibited except in certain circumstances. Therefore, scholars will not accept the notion that Trajan overtly built his column as his sepulcher. Contrary to this opinion, I argue that Trajan did in fact build his column to serve as his sepulcher. Chapter 1 examines the extensive scholarship on Trajan’s Column. Chapter 2 provides a critical discussion of the relevant Roman laws prohibiting urban burial. Chapter 3 discusses the ritual of burial in urbe as it relates to Trajan. Chapter 4 identifies the architectural precedent for Trajan’s Column and precedent for imperial burials in urbe.
    [Show full text]
  • A COMPANION to the ROMAN ARMY Edited By
    ACTA01 8/12/06 11:10 AM Page iii A COMPANION TO THE ROMAN ARMY Edited by Paul Erdkamp ACTA01 8/12/06 11:10 AM Page i A COMPANION TO THE ROMAN ARMY ACTA01 8/12/06 11:10 AM Page ii BLACKWELL COMPANIONS TO THE ANCIENT WORLD This series provides sophisticated and authoritative overviews of periods of ancient history, genres of classical lit- erature, and the most important themes in ancient culture. Each volume comprises between twenty-five and forty concise essays written by individual scholars within their area of specialization. The essays are written in a clear, provocative, and lively manner, designed for an international audience of scholars, students, and general readers. Ancient History Published A Companion to the Roman Army A Companion to the Classical Greek World Edited by Paul Erdkamp Edited by Konrad H. Kinzl A Companion to the Roman Republic A Companion to the Ancient Near East Edited by Nathan Rosenstein and Edited by Daniel C. Snell Robert Morstein-Marx A Companion to the Hellenistic World A Companion to the Roman Empire Edited by Andrew Erskine Edited by David S. Potter In preparation A Companion to Ancient History A Companion to Late Antiquity Edited by Andrew Erskine Edited by Philip Rousseau A Companion to Archaic Greece A Companion to Byzantium Edited by Kurt A. Raaflaub and Hans van Wees Edited by Elizabeth James A Companion to Julius Caesar Edited by Miriam Griffin Literature and Culture Published A Companion to Catullus A Companion to Greek Rhetoric Edited by Marilyn B. Skinner Edited by Ian Worthington A Companion to Greek Religion A Companion to Ancient Epic Edited by Daniel Ogden Edited by John Miles Foley A Companion to Classical Tradition A Companion to Greek Tragedy Edited by Craig W.
    [Show full text]
  • Select Republican Political Institutions in Outline
    ____ APPENDIX: SELECT REPUBLICAN POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS IN OUTLINE (300 before 81; 600 down to 45 Bc; then 900 until SENATE. The main consiliu,’n (“advisory body”) of magistrates, itself consisting mainly of ex-magistrates step aside for others. What the Senate decided Augustus reduced it again to 600). The most senior magistrate available in Rome usually presided, but could the Senate long guided state administration and policy e,zatu.s consultant, abbreviated SC) was strictly only a recommendation to magistrates. But in actual fact, of imperium, triumphs; also the state religion, finance, and preliminary iii almost all matters, including wars, allocation of provinces, (eventually) all extensions in which case it is called patrum auctoritas. The 1isiussion of legislative bills, A SC could be vetoed (by a consul acting against his colleague, or by a tribune), more than advice. SC riltirnurn, first passed in 121, was employed in cases of extreme crisis, but again technically was no ASSEMBLIES (U: POPULUS. COMPOSED OF BOTH PATRICIANS AND PLEBEJANS (NON-PATRICIANS). cum imperia. Gave “military auspices” to consuls, praetors once elected by the Centuriate Assembly; also to dictators, non-magistrates was a consul (or sometimes apparently a practor); in Aserubly Validated in some way the powers of lower magistrates (aediles, quaestors). Its president curiae (“wards”) of the city. (c mitia Cicero’s day, it was enough for a lictor symbolically to represent each of the 30 voting (‘101010) (“infantry”), the latter divided into five classes, Centuriate Originally the army, which had centuriae as its constituent units. Equites (“cavalry”) and pedites A of these 193 voting units, not absolute A ,seni hlv ranked by census wealth, totalled 188 centuries; added to those were five unarmed centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 Early Rome
    Chapter 3 Early Rome 1. THE WARLIKE MEDITERRANEAN Romans lived in a dangerous neighborhood. The whole of Italy was an anarchic world of contending tribes, independent cities, leagues of cities, and federations of pre-state tribes. The Mediterranean world beyond Italy was not much differ- ent. During the period of Rome’s emergence (ca. 500–300 b.c.) the Persian Empire consolidated its hold on the Middle East and the eastern Mediterranean, including parts of the Greek inhabited world, and for two centuries independent Greek city- states and Persians confronted each other, sometimes belligerently, and sometimes as allies. Simultaneously, individual Greek city states waged wars with each other as did alliances of Greek states among themselves. Wars lasted for generations. The great Peloponnesian War between Athens and Sparta and their allies raged in two phases from 460 to 446 b.c. and from 431 to 404 b.c. Sixty-five years later, Mace- donians subdued the squabbling city states of Greece, bringing a kind of order to that war-torn land. Four years after defeating the Greeks, the Macedonians under Alexander the Great went on to conquer the Persian Empire. Their power reached from the Aegean to Afghanistan and India, but not for long as a unified state. After Alexander’s death his successors quarreled and fought each other to a standstill. While these wars were going on in the eastern Mediterranean the Phoenician colony of Carthage emerged as a belligerent, imperialistic power in the western Mediterranean. Just a three- or four-day sail from Rome, Carthage was potentially a much more dangerous than any power in Italy.
    [Show full text]
  • Romanrepublic Part II
    z From monarchy to Republic . Magistrates took the role of the king and spread the power among the rich and powerful. Phenomenon in various cities (remember so far, the political organization is at a local level, no unified greater region yet). Frequent displacement of kings in various cities. Ideological aversion to monarchy and tyranny. Predominance of CONSULSHIP would not become as fixed until later in the 4th century. Things are still fluid in the first couple of centuries of the Republic. TWO Consuls. z z TWELVE TABLES . Let’s look at what we know about the earliest legal system in place. The so called TWELVE TABLES were Rome’s first written law (mid 5th century), also can be seen as a first ‘constitution’ as the law code of the twelve Tables mentions the ‘greatest assembly’ that gives judicial rulings. The very word ‘greatest’ implies the existence of many assemblies. z Content of Twelve Tables . Not a law in the modern sense of the word . Did not attempt systematic treatment of all the law but was more of a collection of specific and rather narrow provisions, a better fit for a society where the household is the foundational unit of social life and has not yet evolved politically. Addressed issues of inheritance, marriage and divorce, rights of the father of the household (PATRIA POTESTAS), regulated land boundaries, farm buildings and fences, slaves, and specified penalties. z z z z What exactly was the Role of the Senate? . The Senate . Under the king, the Senate was only an advisory committee who ratified election of the king by the popular assemblies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Telos of Government
    Xavier University Exhibit Honors Bachelor of Arts Undergraduate 2018-03-26 Democracy vs. Liberty: The eloT s of Government Ryan C. Yeazell Xavier University, Cincinnati, OH Follow this and additional works at: https://www.exhibit.xavier.edu/hab Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, Ancient Philosophy Commons, Classical Archaeology and Art History Commons, Classical Literature and Philology Commons, and the Other Classics Commons Recommended Citation Yeazell, Ryan C., "Democracy vs. Liberty: The eT los of Government" (2018). Honors Bachelor of Arts. 35. https://www.exhibit.xavier.edu/hab/35 This Capstone/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Undergraduate at Exhibit. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Bachelor of Arts by an authorized administrator of Exhibit. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Democracy vs. Liberty: The Telos of Government Ryan Yeazell HAB Capstone Thesis Dr. Strunk March 26, 2018 1 Introduction In 2005, after decades of civil war, the people of South Sudan were victorious against the northern Republic of Sudan and created their own autonomous government. They followed the modern trend of instituting democratic elections and a presidential system, with a bicameral legislature and an independent judiciary. The young regime employed all the building blocks of a modern stable democracy. By 2011, South Sudan declared its full independence from the Republic of Sudan. The country was admitted to the United Nations and internationally recognized as Africa’s newest state. But the stability and legitimacy of this auspicious beginning quickly deteriorated. Within two years, ethnic tensions turned into outright conflict, the President and Vice President led armies against each other, and all the stability that a democratic regime was expected to offer was nowhere to be found.
    [Show full text]
  • The Refusal of the Centuriate Assembly to Declare War on Macedon (200 BC) — a Reappraisal
    The Refusal of the Centuriate Assembly to Declare War on Macedon (200 BC) — A Reappraisal Rachel Feig Vishnia The question why Rome decided to declare war on Macedon in 200 shortly after the conclusion of the long and exhausting Hannibalic war remains in many ways unanswered. Modem scholarship is skeptical about the reasons given by Livy, our only source for this affair. As a result, the motives behind Rome’s decision, which proved to be a milestone in the development of ‘Roman Imperialism’, are widely interpreted and much debated.1 Less attention has been paid both to the initial refusal of the centuriate assembly to approve this war on grounds of war weariness and to the potential implications of this refusal.2 Those who consider this unprecedented popular rebuttal tend to emphasize the fact that the people, intimidated by the consul’s warning of the due consequences if Philip V was allowed to invade Italy, were eventually persuaded to vote for the war.3 Others focus on the period of time that elapsed between the two war votes, which is not specified in the sources, and discuss these in relation to the complex chronology of the events spanning the (second) war vote and the dispatch of the armies to Macedon towards the end of the autumn of 200 (Livy 31.22.4 autumno ferme exacto),4 However, the grounds both for the people’s initial refusal and for the Cf. Livy 31.1. M 0. For review and criticism of previous views, and for a plau­ sible conjecture see E.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Constitution of the Roman Republic: a Political Economy Perspective
    University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound Coase-Sandor Working Paper Series in Law and Coase-Sandor Institute for Law and Economics Economics 2010 The onsC titution of the Roman Republic: A Political Economy Perspective Eric A. Posner Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/law_and_economics Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Eric Posner, "The onC stitution of the Roman Republic: A Political Economy Perspective" (John M. Olin Program in Law and Economics Working Paper No. 540, 2010). This Working Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Coase-Sandor Institute for Law and Economics at Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in Coase-Sandor Working Paper Series in Law and Economics by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CHICAGO JOHN M. OLIN LAW & ECONOMICS WORKING PAPER NO. 540 (2D SERIES) PUBLIC LAW AND LEGAL THEORY WORKING PAPER NO. 327 THE CONSTITUTION OF THE ROMAN REPUBLIC: A POLITICAL ECONOMY PERSPECTIVE Eric A. Posner THE LAW SCHOOL THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO November 2010 This paper can be downloaded without charge at the John M. Olin Program in Law and Economics Working Paper Series: http://www.law.uchicago.edu/Lawecon/index.html and at the Public Law and Legal Theory Working Paper Series: http://www.law.uchicago.edu/academics/publiclaw/index.html and The Social Science Research Network Electronic Paper Collection. The Constitution of the Roman Republic: A Political Economy Perspective Eric A. Posner1 October 31, 2010 Abstract. The constitution of the Roman Republic featured a system of checks and balances that would eventually influence the American founders, yet it had very different characteristics from the system of separation of powers that the founders created.
    [Show full text]
  • The Roman Republican Constitution and Form of Government
    The Roman Republican Constitution and Form of Government Introduction The Romans never had a written constitution, but their form of their government, especially from the time of the passage of the lex Hortensia (287 B.C.), roughly parallels the modern American division of executive, legislative, and judical branches, although the senate doesn't neatly fit any of these categories. What follows is a fairly traditional, Mommsenian reconstruction, though at this level of detail most of the facts (if not the significance of, e.g., the patrician/plebian distinction) are not too controversial. One should be aware, however, of the difficulties surrounding the understanding of forms of government (as well as most other issues) during the first two centuries of the Republic. [For a mid-second century B.C. outsider's account of the Roman government see John Porter's translation of Polybius 6.11-18.] EXECUTIVE BRANCH -- the elected magistrates Collegiality: With the exception of the dictatorship, all offices were collegial, that is, held by at least two men. All members of a college were of equal rank and could veto acts of other members; higher magistrates could veto acts of lower magistrates. The name of each office listed below is followed (in parentheses) by the number of office- holders; note that in several cases the number changes over time (normally increasing). Annual tenure: With the exception of the dictatorship (6 months) and the censorship (18 months), the term of office was limited to one year. The rules for holding office for multiple or sucessive terms were a matter of considerable contention over time.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of Rome: How Did It Happen?
    3 The Rise of Rome: How Did it Happen? This chapter attempts to account for the remarkable growth of Rome discussed in the previous chap- ter. There we saw how all through the fifth and early fourth centuries (ca. 400—380b .c.), Rome had difficulty merely coping with its immediate neighbors and invaders from the nearby hill country. In 390 b.c. it suffered a humiliating defeat at the hands of the Celts, during which Rome itself was captured and burned. Yet by 290 b.c. it had achieved sovereignty over the whole peninsula of Italy, vanquishing in the process its old Celtic enemies as well as the powerful Samnite confederation. A few years later it was able to take on and drive from Italy a professional Hellenistic army led by Pyrrhus, the capable king of Epirus. How did it manage to achieve this spectacular turn around? 1. THE MoST FundAMEntal ExPlAnation: THE NatuRE oF THE PolIS military participation ratios At its most fundamental level, Rome’s success depended on its polis constitution. It was argued in the introduction that the Greek polis was a revolutionary breakthrough in human social and political engineering which produced a new type of state. Rela- tive to its population, more people were involved in its civic and military affairs than any previous form of society. As a consequence, more talent was tapped and more human energies and loyalties were released than was possible, for example, in the much larger but less free empires of the Middle East. When functioning properly, polis-type societies were extraordinarily efficient institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Belly and the Limbs: Reconsidering the Idea of a Plebeian “State Within the State” in the Early Roman Republic DISSERTAT
    The Belly and the Limbs: Reconsidering the Idea of a Plebeian “State Within the State” in the Early Roman Republic DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Gregory George Pellam, Jr. Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2012 Dissertation Committee: Professor Nathan Rosenstein, Advisor Professor Greg Anderson Professor Kristina Sessa Copyright by Gregory George Pellam, Jr. 2012 Abstract This dissertation offers a reevaluation of a long-standing model for the early history of the Roman Republic. Modern scholars have generally believed that the Roman plebs in the first two centuries of the Republic (roughly the fifth and fourth centuries B.C.) was essentially a revolutionary political organization, dedicated to increasing the rights and opportunities of plebeians and overthrowing the patrician monopoly over political, social, religious, and economic power. According to this model, a series of institutions which were dominated by patrician authority (the consulship, the senate, the centuriate assembly) represented the state, and the plebeian organization created its own institutions to mirror these (the tribunes and aediles of the plebs, and a plebeian tribal assembly). Further, the plebs established for itself an administrative center for its political activities on the Aventine hill. They even created their own cult center in the temple of Ceres, Liber, and Libera, to mirror the “state” cult of Jupiter, Juno, and Minerva on the Capitoline. This plebeian organization is often referred to in modern scholarship as a “state within the state”. It is shown, however, that the evidence for the plebeian “state within the state” does not stand careful scrutiny.
    [Show full text]