NATO Handbook 1995

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

NATO Handbook 1995 NATO HANDBOOK October 1995 NATO OFFICE OF INFORMATION AND PR ESS BRUSSELS Reprinted edition, with amendments. NORTH ATLANTIC TREA TY ORGANISA TION {NATO) The North Atlantic Treaty, signed in Washington on 4 April 1949, created an Alliance for collective defence as defined in Article 51 of the United Nations Charter. The Alliance links 14 European countries with the United States and Canada. MEMBER COUNTRIES Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Italy, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States. The NATO Emblem, which appears on the cover of this book, was adopted as the symbol of the Atlantic Alliance by the North Atlantic Council in October 1953. The circle is the symbol of unity and cooperation and the compass rose suggests the common road to peace taken by the 16 member countries of the Atlantic Alliance. 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS page PREFACE 11 What is NATO? 17 The Fundamental Tasks of the Alliance 18 Origins of the Alliance 20 NATO Today 21 PART I - THE TRANSFORMATION OF THE ALLIANCE The Foundations of Eu rope’s New Security Environment 31 Security Architecture - A Broad Approach 39 The Alliance’s Strategic Concept 40 The North Atlantic Cooperation Council (NACC) 43 Partnership for Peace 50 NATO’s Role in Peacekeeping 58 Alliance Interaction with the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE)1 69 The European Security and Defence Identity 72 Arms Control 74 The Challenge of Proliferation 82 The Mediterranean 88 PART II - HOW NATO WORKS The Machinery of NATO 93 The Machinery of Cooperation 103 Fundamental Operating Principles 105 Joint Decision-Making 105 Political Consultation 107 Crisis Management 110 The Defence Dimension 111 Nuclear Policy 113 Economic Cooperation 114 Public Information 117 The NATO Security Investment Programme (Common Infrastructure) 119 ' Formerly CSCE. 5 Logisti c Support 120 Armaments Cooperation 121 Armaments Planning 123 Standardization 123 Communications and Information Systems 125 Air Defence 125 Civil Emergency Planning 127 Civil and Military Coordination of Air Traffic Management 129 Scientific Cooperation and Environmental Challenges 130 PART III - ORGA N ISATION AN D STRUCTURES NATO Headquarters 137 Permanent Representatives and National Delegations 137 The International Staff 137 The Secretary General 139 Private Office 139 Office of the Secretary General 140 Executive Secretarial 140 Office oflnformation and Press 141 N ATO Office of Security 141 Division of Political Affairs 142 Political Directorate 142 Economics Directorate 144 Division of Defence Planning and Policy 144 Force Planning Directorate 144 Nuclear Planning Directorate 145 Division of Defence Support 145 Policy and Coordination Staff 146 Directorate of Armaments Planning, Programmes and Research 146 Directorate of Command, Control and Communications 147 Directorate of Air Defence Systems 147 Division of Infrastructure, Logistics and Civil Emergency Planning 148 Infrastructure Directorate 148 Logistics Directorate 148 Civil Emergency Planning Directorate 149 Division of Scientific and Environmental Affairs 150 Office of Management 151 6 Office of Financial Control 151 Office of the Chairman of the B udget Committees 151 International Board of A uditors 152 New Structures 152 Production and Logistics Organisations 153 National Military Representatives 155 The Military Committee 155 International Military Staff 156 Organisation of the International Military Staff 157 The Role of Allied Military Forces 161 New Force Structures 163 Force Reductions 164 Characteristics of Military Forces under the New Force Structure 165 Composition of Forces 165 Availability and Readiness of Forces 167 NATO’s Integrated Command Structure 168 The Supreme Allied Commander Europe (SACEUR) 169 Allied Command Europe (ACE) 170 ACE Reaction Forces Planning Staff (ARFPS) 173 The Reaction Forces Air Staff (RFAS) 173 NATO Airborne Early Warning Force (NAEWF) 173 The ACE Rapid Reaction Corps (ARRC) 174 Immediate Reaction Forces (Maritime) 175 The ACE Mobile Force (AMF) 176 The Supreme Allied Commander Atlantic (SACLANT) 177 Allied Command Atlantic (ACLANT) 177 Canada-US Regional Planning Group 178 Military Agencies and Organisations 179 Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development (AGARD) 179 Military Agency for Standardization (MAS) 179 NATO Electronic Warfare Advisory Committee (NEWAC) 179 NATO Training Group (NTG) 180 Committee of the Chiefs of Military Medical Services in NATO (COMEDS) 180 Military Committee Meteorological Group (MCMG) 180 Military Telecommunications and CIS Agencies 180 SHAPE Technical Centre (STC) 181 SACLANT Undersea Research Centre (SACLANTCEN) 181 7 NATO Defense College 182 The NATO (SHAPE) School 182 NATO Communications and Information Systems (CIS) School 184 PART IV - THE WIDER INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK The Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE)2 187 The European Union ( EU) 192 The Western European Union (WEU) ' 196 The EUROGROUP and the Independent European Programme Group (IEPG) 203 The Council of Europe 203 PART V - NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANISATIONS North Atlantic Assembly (NAA) 207 Atlantic Treaty Association (ATA) 210 Interallied Co nfederation of Reserve Officers (CIOR) 212 APPENDICES APPENDIX I Members of the North Atlantic Council 2 19 APPENDIX II Secretaries General of NATO 221 APPENDIX III Members of the Military Committee 223 APPENDIX IV Principal Officials of the NATO International Staff 225 APPENDIX V Major NATO Commanders 227 APPENDIX VI Principal Officials of the NATO International Military Staff 227 APPENDIX VII Principal NATO Agencies 229 APPENDIX VIII The North Atlantic Treaty 231 APPENDIX IX The Alliance’s Strategic Concept 235 - Formerly CSCE. 8 APPENDIX X NACC Wo rk Plan fo r Dialogue, Partnership and Coope ration (1994/1995) 249 APPENDIX XI Partnership fo r Peace Invitation 265 Partnership fo r Peace Framework Document 266 APPENDIX XII Declaration of the Heads of State and Government participating in the Meeting of the North Atlantic Council held at NATO Headquarters, Brussels, on 10-11 January 1994 269 APPENDIX XIII Key Arms Control Treaties and Agreements ( 1963-1994) 277 APPENDIX XIV Abbreviations in Common Use 283 APPENDIX XV Chronology of Events ( 1945-1994) 295 APPENDIX XVI Financial and Economic Data Relating to Defence 353 The NATO Integrated Data Service (NIDS) 367 LIST OF ILLUSTRATION S NATO’s Civil and Military Structure 95 Principal NATO Committees 97 Principal NATO Committees addressing NACC and PFP activities 101 NATO International Staff 138 Divisions of the International Staff 143 NATO Military Structure 159 NATO International Military Staff 159 9 PREFACE In 1989 the world witnessed the beginning of a process of fundamental political change in East-West relations in­ cluding the dismantling of the Berlin Wall, the disappear­ ance of one-party Communist states throughout Central and Eastern Europe, the establishment of free and inde­ pendent states in the republics of the former Soviet Union, and the end of the division of Europe. The role played by the North Atlantic Alliance, from its establish­ ment in 1949 to the end of the Cold War four decades later, was fundamental in bringing about the conditions which made these developments possible. As the instru­ ment for guaranteeing the security, freedom and independ­ ence of its members, maintaining a strategic balance in Europe and promoting democratic values and the emer­ gence of European democratic institutions, the Alliance created the stability which was the precondition for bring­ ing an end to the adversarial relationship between East and West. The advent of these momentous events and of the trans­ formation of the security environment has had a profound impact on the North Atlantic Alliance. Marking the end of the political, ideological and military confrontation between East and West which characterised the Cold War years, it has enabled the Alliance to reorient its policies, maintaining its core function of ensuring the security of its member states while pursuing its long-stand­ ing political goal of establishing a just and lasting peaceful order in Europe. In addition to heralding a new era in international relations of world-wide significance, the end of the Cold War has enabled the Alliance to make major reductions in the levels of its armed forces and in aspects of their readiness and deployment. It has also resulted in a number of new or much expanded tasks for the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation. These include establishing a process of dialogue, cooperation and partnership with the states of Central and Eastern Europe and with those 11 states which gained independence ofollwing the dissolu­ tion of the Soviet Union, as well as with other countries belonging to the Organisation for Security and Coopera­ tion in Europe (OSCE)1; developing a close working relationship with the OSCE and with other international institutions, notably the United Nations, the European Union and the Western European Union; and introducing new military command and force structures reflecting the changed strategic environment. In the follow-up to the July 1990 London Declaration on a Transformed North Atlantic Alliance, the November 1991 Rome Declaration on Peace and Cooperation and the publication of the Alliance’s new Strategic Concept, consultations among member countries of NATO contin­ ued to focus on the future structure and organisation of the Alliance in the light of major strategic change, decreas­ ing resources for
Recommended publications
  • Verifying European Union Arms Embargoes
    Verification Research, Training and Information Centre Verifying European Union arms embargoes Paper submitted to the United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR) for the European Commission project on ‘European Action on Small Arms, Light Weapons and Explosive Remnants of War’ Disclaimer: The views expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect the views or opinion of the United Nations, UNIDIR, its members or sponsors. 18 April 2005 1 Verifying European Union arms embargoes Introduction 1. Analysis of the current situation 1.1 What is the role of monitoring and verification in making arms embargoes effective? 1.2 EU arms embargoes and UN arms embargoes 1.3 The link between EU arms embargoes and UN arms embargoes 1.4 How EU member states currently implement EU and UN arms embargoes 1.5 Monitoring and enforcing EU and UN embargoes 2. Recommendations 2.1 Drafting EU arms embargoes 2.2 Monitoring and enforcement 2.3 Additional recommendations Annex 1: Table of current EU and UN arms embargoes Introduction1 There are many reasons why sanctions—coercive measures undertaken by a group of nations in an effort to influence another nation into following international law or submitting to a judgment—may be adopted against a state. One of the most common is to improve the human rights situation in the sanctioned state by targeting the perpetrators of human rights abuses, who may be individuals, non-state actors, government elites or the military. They are also used to change the behaviour of a state which is undermining democracy or the rule of law, or which has threatened the security of a particular region.
    [Show full text]
  • The Emerging EU Military- Industrial Complex Arms Industry Lobbying in Brussels
    The emerging EU Military- Industrial Complex Arms industry lobbying in Brussels Frank Slijper TRANSNATIONAL INSTITUTE T N I B R I E F I N G S E R I E S Dutch CtW Campaign No 2005/1 Against Arms Trade Frank Slijper Author: Frank Slijper INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 3 Editors: 1 THE CONSTITUTION AND THE EUROPEAN Wilbert van der Zeijden DEFENCE AGENCY 5 Imre Szücs • Box: EDA in the Constitution Design: Zlatan Peric 2 MULTIPLE MILITARY STAKEHOLDERS 10 • The Group of Personalities Contact: • Box: Who is Philippe Busquin? Transnational Institute • Box: Meanwhile in the Netherlands De Wittenstraat 25 • LeaderSHIP 2015 PO Box 14656 • Box: Who is Erkki Liikanen? 1001 LD Amsterdam • Star 21 The Netherlands Tel: +31-20-6626608 Fax: +31-20-6757176 3 MILITARY INDUSTRIAL LOBBY 24 [email protected] • ASD www.tni.org • Box: EDIG + AECMA = ASD • Forum Europe and the New Defence Agenda • The Kangaroo Group • Box: Who is Karl von Wogau? 4 CONSEQUENCES FOR ARMS EXPORTS POLICY 31 CONCLUDING REMARKS 33 GLOSSARY 35 Contents of this booklet may be quoted or reproduced, provided that the source of informations is acknowledged. TNI would like to receive a copy of the document in which this booklet is used or quoted. You can stay informed of TNI publications and activities by subscribing to TNI’s bi-weekly email newsletter. Send your request to [email protected] Amsterdam, May 2005 The emerging EU military-industrial complex INTRODUCTION After many years of ideas, but little substance, military developments in the European Union are currently moving forward faster than ever before.
    [Show full text]
  • Presidents of the United Nations General Assembly
    Presidents of the United Nations General Assembly Sixty -ninth 2014 Mr. Sam Kahamba Kutesa (Pres i- Uganda dent-elect) Sixty -eighth 2013 Mr. John W. Ashe Antigua and Barbuda Sixty -seventh 2012 Mr. Vuk Jeremić Serbia Sixty -sixth 2011 Mr. Nassir Abdulaziz Al -Nasser Qatar Sixty -fifth 2010 Mr. Joseph Deiss Switzerland Sixty -fourth 2009 Dr. Ali Abdussalam Treki Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Tenth emergency special (resumed) 2009 Father Miguel d’Escoto Brockmann Nicaragua Sixty -third 2008 Father Miguel d’Escoto Brockmann Nicaragua Sixty -second 2007 Dr. Srgjan Kerim The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Tenth emergency special (resumed twice) 2006 Sheikha Haya Rashed Al Khalifa Bahrain Sixty -first 2006 Sheikha Haya Rashed Al Khalifa Bahrain Sixtieth 2005 Mr. Jan Eliasson Sweden Twenty -eighth special 2005 Mr. Jean Ping Gabon Fifty -ninth 2004 Mr. Jean Ping Gabon Tenth emergency special (resumed) 2004 Mr. Julian Robert Hunte Saint Lucia (resumed twice) 2003 Mr. Julian Robert Hunte Saint Lucia Fifty -eighth 2003 Mr. Julian Robert Hunte Saint Lucia Fifty -seventh 2002 Mr. Jan Kavan Czech Republic Twenty -seventh special 2002 Mr. Han Seung -soo Republic of Korea Tenth emergency special (resumed twice) 2002 Mr. Han Seung -soo Republic of Korea (resumed) 2001 Mr. Han Seung -soo Republic of Korea Fifty -sixth 2001 Mr. Han Seung -soo Republic of Korea Twenty -sixth special 2001 Mr. Harri Holkeri Finland Twenty -fifth special 2001 Mr. Harri Holkeri Finland Tenth emergency special (resumed) 2000 Mr. Harri Holkeri Finland Fifty -fifth 2000 Mr. Harri Holkeri Finland Twenty -fourth special 2000 Mr. Theo -Ben Gurirab Namibia Twenty -third special 2000 Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Prague Summit and Nato's Transformation
    THE PRAGUE SUMMIT AND NATO’S TRANSFORMATION NATO PUBLIC DIPLOMACY DIVISION 1110 Brussels - Belgium Web site: www.nato.int E-mail: [email protected] A READER’S GUIDE THE PRAGUE SUMMIT AND NATO’S TRANSFORMATION SUMMIT AND NATO’S THE PRAGUE PRARGENG0403 A READER’S GUIDE TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE 3 I THE SUMMIT DECISIONS 9 II KEY ISSUES 19 New members: Expanding the zone of security 20 New capabilities: Adapting to modern challenges 26 New relationships: Practical cooperation and dialogue 34 After Prague: The road ahead 67 © NATO 2003 NATO INVITEES Country* Capital Population GDP Defence Active Troop *Data based on (million) (billion expenditures Strength national sources Euros) (million Euros) Bulgaria (25) Sofia 7.8 16.9 494 (2.9% GDP) 52 630 Estonia (27) Tallin 1.4 6.8 130 (1.9% GDP) 4 783 Latvia (33) Riga 2.3 8.8 156 (1.8% GDP) 9 526 Lithuania (34) Vilnius 3.5 14.5 290 (2.0% GDP) 17 474 Romania (36) Bucharest 22.3 47.9 1117 (2.3% GDP) 99 674 Slovakia (38) Bratislava 5.4 24.9 493 (2.0% GDP) 29 071 ★ Slovenia (39) Ljubljana 2.0 22.4 344 (1.5% GDP) 7 927 III DOCUMENTATION 71 Prague Summit Declaration – 21 November 2002 72 Prague Summit Statement on Iraq – 21 November 2002 78 Announcement on Enlargement – 21 November 2002 79 Report on the Comprehensive Review of the Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council and Partnership for Peace - 21 November 2002 80 Partnership Action Plan Against Terrorism - 21 November 2002 87 Chairman’s Summary of the Meeting of the Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council at Summit Level – 22 November 2002 94 Statement by NATO
    [Show full text]
  • Doubling NATO: Functional and Geographical Enlargement of the Alliance Ergodan Kurt Old Dominion University
    Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons Graduate Program in International Studies Theses & Graduate Program in International Studies Dissertations Spring 2010 Doubling NATO: Functional and Geographical Enlargement of the Alliance Ergodan Kurt Old Dominion University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/gpis_etds Part of the International Relations Commons Recommended Citation Kurt, Ergodan. "Doubling NATO: Functional and Geographical Enlargement of the Alliance" (2010). Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), dissertation, International Studies, Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/4bgn-h798 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/gpis_etds/75 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Program in International Studies at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Program in International Studies Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DOUBLING NATO: FUNCTIONAL AND GEOGRAPHICAL ENLARGEMENT OF THE ALLIANCE by Erdogan Kurt B.A. August 1996, Turkish Military Academy M.A. July 2001, Naval Postgraduate School A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of Old Dominion University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY INTERNATIONAL STUDIES OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY May 2010 Approved by: ©2010 Erdogan Kurt. All rights reserved. ABSTRACT DOUBLING NATO: FUNCTIONAL AND GEOGRAPHICAL ENLARGEMENT OF THE ALLIANCE Erdogan Kurt Old Dominion University, 2010 Director: Dr. Regina Karp This dissertation studies NATO expansion as institutional adaptation. More specifically, it examines the interaction between NATO's functional and geographical enlargement. This study asserts that there is a close relationship between NATO's new functions and its enlargement.
    [Show full text]
  • CORE View Metadata, Citation and Similar Papers at Core.Ac.Uk
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by DSpace at VSB Technical University of Ostrava VYSOKÁ ŠKOLA BÁŇSKÁ – TECHNICKÁ UNIVERZITA OSTRAVA EKONOMICKÁ FAKULTA KATEDRA EVROPSKÉ INTEGRACE Spolupráce Evropské unie a NATO v kontextu nových bezpečnostních hrozeb Cooperation of the European Union and NATO in the Context of New Security Threats Student: Bc. Martin Mlčoch Vedoucí diplomové práce: Ing. Radomír Kaňa, Ph.D. Ostrava 2016 Prohlášení Místopřísežně prohlašuji, že jsem celou práci, včetně všech příloh, vypracoval samostatně. V Ostravě dne 22. dubna 2016 … … … … … … … … … … … … vlastnoruční podpis autora Poděkování Na tomto místě bych rád poděkoval vedoucímu práce Ing. Radomíru Kaňovi Ph.D. a por. Ing. Lukášovi Esterkovi za věcné připomínky a cenné rady, čímž přispěli k vypracování této diplomové práce. Obsah 1 Úvod ......................................................................................................................................... 4 2 Vývoj NATO a Společné bezpečnostní a obranné politiky Evropské unie ....................... 6 2.1 Založení a vývoj NATO ................................................................................................. 7 2.1.1 Poválečná situace v Evropě a zrod NATO .............................................................. 7 2.1.2 Severoatlantická aliance v průběhu studené války .................................................. 9 2.1.3 NATO po ukončení bipolárního rozdělení světa ................................................... 17
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.THE IMPACT of NATO on the SPANISH AIR FORCE
    UNISCI Discussion Papers ISSN: 1696-2206 [email protected] Universidad Complutense de Madrid España Yaniz Velasco, Federico THE IMPACT OF NATO ON THE SPANISH AIR FORCE: A HISTORICAL OVERVIEW AND FUTURE PROSPECTS UNISCI Discussion Papers, núm. 22, enero, 2010, pp. 224-244 Universidad Complutense de Madrid Madrid, España Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=76712438014 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative UNISCI Discussion Papers, Nº 22 (January / Enero 2010) ISSN 1696-2206 THE IMPACT OF NATO ON THE SPANISH AIR FORCE: A HISTORICAL OVERVIEW AND FUTURE PROSPECTS Federico Yaniz Velasco 1 Brigadier General, Spanish Air Force (Retired) Abstract: The Spanish Air Force is one of the oldest independent Air Forces in the world and the youngest service of the Spanish Armed Forces. Since the early 50’s of the last century it was very much involved in exercises and training with the United States Air Force following the Agreements that Spain signed with the United States in 1953. That is why when Spain joined NATO in 1982 the Spanish Air Force was already somewhat familiar with NATO doctrine and procedures. In the following years, cooperation with NATO was increased dramatically through exercises and, when necessary, in operations. The Spanish Air Force is now ready and well prepared to contribute to the common defence of NATO nations and to participate in NATO led operations whenever the Spanish government decides to do so.
    [Show full text]
  • NATO and Japan: a Strategic Convergence? Post Cold-War Geopolitics: Russia, China, Anti-Piracy and Anti-Terrorism
    Original Article NATO and Japan: A strategic convergence? Post cold-war geopolitics: Russia, China, anti-piracy and anti-terrorism David Scott Analyst-consultant, 7 Barrepta Close, Carbis Bay, St. Ives, Cornwall, TR26 2LL, UK. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract In this article, I argue that NATO and Japan, from a parallel anti-Soviet Cold War position through common links with the United States, have directly moved towards each other since the 1990s. Each of them has gone more global. NATO’s ‘out of area’ operations have taken NATO eastwards from its previous focus on Europe and the Mediterranean, while Japan’s gradual multilateral activism have taken it westwards from its previous focus on East Asia. This has created geopolitical overlap between these two actors, most notably in Afghanistan but also elsewhere in the Indian Ocean. Common advocacy of liberal democracy, and overt concerns over jihadist and piracy destabilisation have brought these two actors together. NATO’s post-Cold War search for relevance meets Japan’s wider external security sensitivity, especially with regard to China’s rise. However, while NATO has adopted a flexible range of ‘Partnership’ frameworks, there have been long-running constitutional impediments to Japan deploying military forces outside its own immediate territory. It is precisely this impediment to further NATO- Japan interaction that the Japanese government has been removing during 2015. International Politics (2016) 53, 324–342. doi:10.1057/ip.2016.1; published online 4 March 2016 Keywords: NATO; Japan; geopolitics; Russia; China; anti-piracy Introduction Couched in high flowing rhetoricAUTHOR from North Atlantic Treaty Organisation COPY (NATO) figures about ‘Japan, the country in Asia with which NATO has the longest-standing relationship, a truly unique partner for the Alliance’ (Erdmann, 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • List of Presidents of the Presidents United Nations General Assembly
    Sixty-seventh session of the General Assembly To convene on United Nations 18 September 2012 List of Presidents of the Presidents United Nations General Assembly Session Year Name Country Sixty-seventh 2012 Mr. Vuk Jeremić (President-elect) Serbia Sixty-sixth 2011 Mr. Nassir Abdulaziz Al-Nasser Qatar Sixty-fifth 2010 Mr. Joseph Deiss Switzerland Sixty-fourth 2009 Dr. Ali Abdussalam Treki Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Tenth emergency special (resumed) 2009 Father Miguel d’Escoto Brockmann Nicaragua Sixty-third 2008 Father Miguel d’Escoto Brockmann Nicaragua Sixty-second 2007 Dr. Srgjan Kerim The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Tenth emergency special (resumed twice) 2006 Sheikha Haya Rashed Al Khalifa Bahrain Sixty-first 2006 Sheikha Haya Rashed Al Khalifa Bahrain Sixtieth 2005 Mr. Jan Eliasson Sweden Twenty-eighth special 2005 Mr. Jean Ping Gabon Fifty-ninth 2004 Mr. Jean Ping Gabon Tenth emergency special (resumed) 2004 Mr. Julian Robert Hunte Saint Lucia (resumed twice) 2003 Mr. Julian Robert Hunte Saint Lucia Fifty-eighth 2003 Mr. Julian Robert Hunte Saint Lucia Fifty-seventh 2002 Mr. Jan Kavan Czech Republic Twenty-seventh special 2002 Mr. Han Seung-soo Republic of Korea Tenth emergency special (resumed twice) 2002 Mr. Han Seung-soo Republic of Korea (resumed) 2001 Mr. Han Seung-soo Republic of Korea Fifty-sixth 2001 Mr. Han Seung-soo Republic of Korea Twenty-sixth special 2001 Mr. Harri Holkeri Finland Twenty-fifth special 2001 Mr. Harri Holkeri Finland Tenth emergency special (resumed) 2000 Mr. Harri Holkeri Finland Fifty-fifth 2000 Mr. Harri Holkeri Finland Twenty-fourth special 2000 Mr. Theo-Ben Gurirab Namibia Twenty-third special 2000 Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Antecedentes De La OTAN
    Antecedentes de la OTAN La OTAN respeta el sistema de cumbres que se realizan periódicamente en sede de los países miembro. La Organización del Tratado del Atlántico Norte (cuyo acrónimo en español es OTAN) es una organización internacional establecida en 1949 con el objetivo de colaborar en la defensa en los campos político, económico y militar. Nació a raíz de un acuerdo denominado Tratado del Atlántico Norte que fue firmado en Washington, D.C. el 4 de abril de 1949. El equivalente en inglés es North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO). Teóricamente destinado a ser una garantía de seguridad de los estados de Europa Occidental ante la Unión Soviética y sus aliados. El Pacto de Varsovia se creó más tarde, en 1955, para contrarrestar a la OTAN tras la admisión y el posible rearme de la República Federal de Alemania. Como le era propio a la coyuntura de la guerra fría las fuerzas de la OTAN actuaron sólo como fuerza disuasoria. Tras la desintegración de la Unión Soviética, la OTAN ha reformulado sus objetivos y actividades hasta apropiarse de la seguridad de todo el hemisferio norte. En este marco, se desarrolló la única operación de ataque a un país de la OTAN en toda su historia, el ataque contra Yugoslavia en 1999. Inicialmente, el ataque estaba destinado a parar la limpieza étnica en Kosovo, donde se realizó una gran cantidad de crímenes contra población civil, además de suponer el campo de pruebas del armamento radioactivo de baja intensidad (los proyectiles de uranio empobrecido). Tras la invasión de Afganistán por parte de EEUU, la OTAN ha llevado una misión encargada por la ONU llamada Fuerza Internacional de Asistencia a la Seguridad (ISAF).
    [Show full text]
  • Presidentes De La Asamblea General De Las Naciones Unidas
    Sexagésimo tercer período de sesiones de la Asamblea General Fecha de apertura: Naciones Unidas 16 de septiembre de 2008 Lista Presidentes de la Asamblea General de Presidentes de las Naciones Unidas PERÍODO DE SESIONES AÑO NOMBRE PAÍS Padre Miguel d’Escoto Brockmann Sexagésimo tercero 2008 Nicaragua (Presidente electo) Sexagésimo segundo 2007 Dr. Srgjan Kerim ex República Yugoslava de Macedonia Décimo extraordinario de emergencia 2006 Jequesa Haya Rashed Al Khalifa Bahrein (reanudado dos veces) Sexagésimo primero 2006 Jequesa Haya Rashed Al Khalifa Bahrein Sexagésimo 2005 Sr. Jan Eliasson Suecia Vigésimo octavo extraordinario 2005 Sr. Jean Ping Gabón Quincuagésimo noveno 2004 Sr. Jean Ping Gabón Décimo extraordinario 2004 Sr. Julian Robert Hunte Santa Lucía de emergencia (continuación) Décimo extraordinario 2003 Sr. Julian Robert Hunte Santa Lucía de emergencia (reanudado dos veces) Quincuagésimo octavo 2003 Sr. Julian Robert Hunte Santa Lucía Quincuagésimo séptimo 2002 Sr. Jan Kavan República Checa Vigésimo séptimo extraordinario 2002 Sr. Han Seung-soo República de Corea Décimo extraordinario 2002 Sr. Han Seung-soo República de Corea de emergencia (reanudado dos veces) Décimo extraordinario 2001 Sr. Han Seung-soo República de Corea de emergencia (continuación) Quincuagésimo sexto 2001 Sr. Han Seung-soo República de Corea Vigésimo sexto extraordinario 2001 Sr. Harri Holkeri Finlandia Vigésimo quinto extraordinario 2001 Sr. Harri Holkeri Finlandia Décimo extraordinario 2000 Sr. Harri Holkeri Finlandia de emergencia (continuación) Quincuagésimo quinto 2000 Sr. Harri Holkeri Finlandia Vigésimo cuarto extraordinario 2000 Sr. Theo-Ben Gurirab Namibia Vigésimo tercero extraordinario 2000 Sr. Theo-Ben Gurirab Namibia Vigésimo segundo extraordinario 1999 Sr. Theo-Ben Gurirab Namibia Quincuagésimo cuarto 1999 Sr. Theo-Ben Gurirab Namibia Vigésimo primero extraordinario 1999 Sr.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1: the Brussels Treaty
    Appendix 1: The Brussels Treaty Treaty of economic, social and cultural collaboration and collective self-defence Signed at Brussels on 17 March 1948 between His Majesty in respect of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, His Royal Highness the Prince Regent of Belgium, the President of the French Republic, Her Royal Highness the Grand Duchess of Luxembourg, and Her Majesty the Queen of the Netherlands Article I Convinced of the close community of their interests and of the necessity of uniting in order to promote the economic recovery of Europe, the High Contracting Parties will so organize and co-ordinate their economic activities as to produce the best possible results, by the elimination of conflict in their economic policies, the co-ordination of production and the development of commercial exchanges. The co-operation provided for in the preceding paragraph, which will be effected through the Consultative Council referred to in Article VII as well as through other bodies, shall not involve any duplication of, or prejudice to, the work of other economic organizations in which the High Contracting Parties are or may be represented but shall on the contrary assist the work of those organizations. Article II The High Contracting Parties will make every effort in common, both by direct consultation and in specialized agencies, to promote the attainment of a higher standard of living by their peoples and to develop on corresponding lines the social and other related services of their countries. The High Contracting Parties will consult with the object of achieving the earliest possible application of recommendations of immediate practical inter- est, relating to social matters, adopted with their approval in the specialized agencies.
    [Show full text]