The Routledge Handbook of Semantics

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Routledge Handbook of Semantics The Routledge Handbook of Semantics The Routledge Handbook of Semantics provides a broad and state-of-the-art survey of this field, covering semantic research at both word and sentence level. It presents a synoptic view of the most important areas of semantic investigation, including contemporary methodologies and debates, and indicating possible future directions in the field. Written by experts from around the world, the 29 chapters cover key issues and approaches within the following areas: • meaning and conceptualisation • meaning and context • lexical semantics • semantics of specific phenomena • development, change and variation. The Routledge Handbook of Semantics is essential reading for researchers and postgraduate students working in this area. Nick Riemer is a senior lecturer in the English and Linguistics Departments at the University of Sydney, and a member of the Laboratoire d’histoire des théories linguistiques, Université Paris-Diderot. He specializes in semantics and in the history and philosophy of linguistics. Routledge Handbooks in Linguistics Routledge Handbooks in Linguistics provide overviews of a whole subject area or sub-discipline in linguistics, and survey the state of the discipline including emerging and cutting-edge areas. Edited by leading scholars, these volumes include contributions from key academics from around the world and are essential reading for both advanced undergraduate and postgraduate students. The Routledge Handbook of Syntax The Routledge Handbook of the English Edited by Andrew Carnie, Yosuke Sato and Writing System Daniel Siddiqi Edited by Vivian Cook and Des Ryan The Routledge Handbook of Historical The Routledge Handbook of Language Linguistics and Media Edited by Claire Bowern and Edited by Daniel Perrin and Colleen Cotter Bethwyn Evans The Routledge Handbook of The Routledge Handbook of Language Phonological Theory and Culture Edited by S. J. Hannahs and Anna Bosch Edited by Farzad Sharifan The Routledge Handbook of Theoretical The Routledge Handbook of Semantics and Experimental Sign Language Edited by Nick Riemer Research Edited by Annika Hermann, Roland Pfau The Routledge Handbook of Morphology and Josep Quer Edited by Francis Katamba The Routledge Handbook of Linguistic The Routledge Handbook of Linguistics Anthropology Edited by Keith Allan Edited by Nancy Bonvillain The Routledge Handbook of Semantics Edited by Nick Riemer First published 2016 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN and by Routledge 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business © 2016 selection and editorial matter, Nick Riemer; individual chapters, the contributors The right of the editor to be identified as the author of the editorial material, and of the authors for their individual chapters, has been asserted in accordance with sections 77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. Trademark notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe. British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The Routledge Handbook of Semantics/Edited by Nick Riemer. pages cm. – (Routledge handbooks in linguistics) Includes index. 1. Semantics–Handbooks, manuals, etc. 2. Historical semantics–Handbooks, manuals, etc. 3. Generative semantics–Handbooks, manuals, etc. 4. Lexicology. I. Riemer, Nick, 1972- P325.R78 2015 401′.43–dc23 2015003748 ISBN: 978-0-415-66173-7 (hbk) ISBN: 978-1-315-68553-3 (ebk) Typeset in Times New Roman by Swales & Willis Ltd, Exeter, Devon, UK i.m. Peter Koch Contents List of figures x List of tables xi List of contributors xii Acknowledgements xvi Introduction: Semantics – a theory in search of an object 1 Nick Riemer PART I Foundational issues 11 1 (Descriptive) Externalism in semantics 13 Steven Gross 2 Internalist semantics: meaning, conceptualization and expression 30 Nick Riemer 3 A history of semantics 48 Keith Allan PART II Approaches 69 4 Foundations of formal semantics 71 Jon Gajewski 5 Cognitive semantics 90 Maarten Lemmens 6 Corpus semantics 106 Michael Stubbs vii Contents PART III Meaning and conceptualization 123 7 Categories, prototypes and exemplars 125 James A. Hampton 8 Embodiment, simulation and meaning 142 Benjamin Bergen 9 Linguistic relativity 158 Daniel Casasanto PART IV Meaning and context 175 10 Semantics and pragmatics 177 John Saeed 11 Contextual adjustment of meaning 195 Robyn Carston PART V Lexical semantics 211 12 Lexical decomposition 213 Nick Riemer 13 Sense individuation 233 Dirk Geeraerts 14 Sense relations 248 Petra Storjohann 15 Semantic shift 266 John Newman PART VI Semantics of specific phenomena 281 16 The semantics of nominals 283 Sebastian Löbner 17 Negation and polarity 303 Doris Penka viii Contents 18 Varieties of quantification 320 Anna Szabolcsi 19 Lexical and grammatical aspect 338 Stephen Dickey 20 Tense 354 Ilse Depraetere and Raphael Salkie 21 Modality 370 Ilse Depraetere 22 Event semantics 387 Jean-Pierre Koenig 23 Participant roles 403 Beatrice Primus 24 Compositionality 419 Adele E. Goldberg 25 The semantics of lexical typology 434 Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Ekaterina Rakhilina and Martine Vanhove PART VII Extensions 455 26 Acquisition of meaning 457 Soonja Choi 27 Expressives 473 Ad Foolen 28 Interpretative semantics 491 François Rastier 29 Semantic processing 507 Steven Frisson and Martin J. Pickering Index 525 ix Figures 5.1 Semantic prototype category (radial network) 95 5.2 Extension, schematisation and instantiation in a schematic network 96 5.3 A (simplified) schematic network for kill 96 5.4 A (simplified) schematic network for work one’s X off 102 7.1 A semantic network representation of the meaning of BIRD 126 7.2 A feature representation of the meaning of BIRD 127 12.1 Componential analysis of some English words for marine vessels 217 15.1 The core concepts underlying semantic shift in Cognitive Grammar 270 15.2 Core concepts applied to a semantic shift in fruit 270 15.3 Isolectal map for Russian dux 276 16.1 Operations of the Relation layer 291 16.2 Operations of the levels Unit and Quantity 294 16.3 Operations of determination on the seven layers 300 17.1 Hierarchy of negation and distribution of different classes of NPIs 313 25.1 Semantic maps of EMPTINESS in Mandarin and in Serbian 446 25.2 A three-dimensional plot of cutting and breaking events 447 25.3 Probabilistic semantic maps of the “go”, “come” and “arrive” domain in Sora and Classical Greek in the Gospel according to Mark 448 25.4 “Cold” in Armenian, English, Palula and Kamang 449 x Tables 3.1 A componential table 59 19.1 Extended typology of situation type 339 19.2 PF:IMPF in Classical Arabic (Dahl, 1985: 83) 342 19.3 Figures for four Russian aspectual pairs by tense and aspect 343 19.4 Perfective and imperfective markers in Mandarin Chinese 344 19.5 The Russian system of aspectual pairs 347 19.6 Russian viewpoint aspect and tense 347 19.7 Parallels between nouns and situation type 351 21.1 Classifications of modal meaning 373 21.2 Classification of root possibility meanings based on Depraetere and Reed (2011) 375 24.1 Georgian morphological paradigm based on Gurevich (2006: section 3.2) 423 24.2 English argument structure constructions 424 25.1 Hand vs. arm, foot vs. leg, finger vs. toe in English, Italian, Romanian, Estonian, Japanese and Khalkha Mongolian 435 25.2 Sibling terms in six languages 438 xi Contributors Keith Allan MLitt, PhD (Edinburgh), FAHA, is Emeritus Professor of Linguistics at Monash University and Honorary Associate Professor at the University of Queensland. His research interests focus mainly on aspects of meaning in language, with a secondary interest in the history and philosophy of linguistics. Author of several books and many contributions to scholarly books and journals, he has also edited several books and edits the Australian Journal of Linguistics. Email: [email protected]. Homepage: http://profiles.arts. monash.edu.au/keith-allan. Benjamin Bergen is Professor of Cognitive Science at the University of California, San Diego, where he directs the Language and Cognition Lab. His research addresses mean- ing-making processes in language production and comprehension, inclu ding how lexical and grammatical knowledge contribute to meaning in both literal and figurative language. Robyn Carston is Professor of Linguistics at University College London and Research Coordinator at the Centre for the Study of Mind in Nature, Oslo. Her main research interests are in pragmatics, semantics, relevance theory, word meaning and figurative language. She has published a monograph, Thoughts and utterances: the pragmatics of explicit communication (Blackwell, 2002), and is currently preparing a collection of papers to be published under the title Pragmatics and semantic content (Oxford University Press). Daniel Casasanto is Assistant Professor of Psychology at the University of Chicago, and a founding editor of the journal Language and Cognition (Cambridge University Press). His research explores how linguistic, cultural and bodily experiences shape our brains and minds. Soonja Choi has conducted cross-linguistic studies since the mid-1980s (using both naturalistic and experimental data) comparing acquisition of Korean with other languages on negation, modality, lexicon and, more recently, spatial semantics and motion event expressions. Her primary goal is to understand the nature of interaction between language and cognition from infancy to adulthood in these semantic domains. Ilse Depraetere is Professor of English Linguistics at the University of Lille III. Most of her publications relate to tense, aspect and modality in English. She has written a grammar of English with Chad Langford.
Recommended publications
  • Comparing Bar Chart Authoring with Microsoft Excel and Tangible Tiles Tiffany Wun, Jennifer Payne, Samuel Huron, Sheelagh Carpendale
    Comparing Bar Chart Authoring with Microsoft Excel and Tangible Tiles Tiffany Wun, Jennifer Payne, Samuel Huron, Sheelagh Carpendale To cite this version: Tiffany Wun, Jennifer Payne, Samuel Huron, Sheelagh Carpendale. Comparing Bar Chart Authoring with Microsoft Excel and Tangible Tiles. Computer Graphics Forum, Wiley, 2016, Computer Graphics Forum, 35 (3), pp.111 - 120. 10.1111/cgf.12887. hal-01400906 HAL Id: hal-01400906 https://hal-imt.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01400906 Submitted on 10 Oct 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Eurographics Conference on Visualization (EuroVis) 2016 Volume 35 (2016), Number 3 K.-L. Ma, G. Santucci, and J. van Wijk (Guest Editors) Comparing Bar Chart Authoring with Microsoft Excel and Tangible Tiles Tiffany Wun1, Jennifer Payne1, Samuel Huron1;2, and Sheelagh Carpendale1 1University of Calgary, Canada 2I3-SES, CNRS, Télécom ParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, 75013, Paris, France Abstract Providing tools that make visualization authoring accessible to visualization non-experts is a major research challenge. Cur- rently the most common approach to generating a visualization is to use software that quickly and automatically produces visualizations based on templates. However, it has recently been suggested that constructing a visualization with tangible tiles may be a more accessible method, especially for people without visualization expertise.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 14: Evaluation the Perceptual Scalability of Visualization
    Readings Covered Further Readings Evaluation, Carpendale Evaluating Information Visualizations. Sheelagh Carpendale. Chapter in Task-Centered User Interface Design, Clayton Lewis and John Rieman, thorough survey/discussion, won’t summarize here Information Visualization: Human-Centered Issues and Perspectives, Chapters 0-5. Springer LNCS 4950, 2008, p 19-45. The challenge of information visualization evaluation. Catherine Plaisant. Lecture 14: Evaluation The Perceptual Scalability of Visualization. Beth Yost and Chris North. Proc. Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI) 2004 Proc. InfoVis 06, published as IEEE TVCG 12(5), Sep 2006, p 837-844. Information Visualization Effectiveness of Animation in Trend Visualization. George G. Robertson, CPSC 533C, Fall 2011 Turning Pictures into Numbers: Extracting and Generating Information Roland Fernandez, Danyel Fisher, Bongshin Lee, and John T. Stasko. from Complex Visualizations. J. Gregory Trafton, Susan S. IEEE TVCG (Proc. InfoVis 2008). 14(6): 1325-1332 (2008) Kirschenbaum, Ted L. Tsui, Robert T. Miyamoto, James A. Ballas, and Artery Visualizations for Heart Disease Diagnosis. Michelle A. Borkin, Tamara Munzner Paula D. Raymond. Intl Journ. Human Computer Studies 53(5), Krzysztof Z. Gajos, Amanda Peters, Dimitrios Mitsouras, Simone 827-850. Melchionna, Frank J. Rybicki, Charles L. Feldman, and Hanspeter Pfister. UBC Computer Science IEEE TVCG (Proc. InfoVis 2011), 17(12):2479-2488. Wed, 2 November 2011 1 / 46 2 / 46 3 / 46 4 / 46 Psychophysics Cognitive Psychology Structural Analysis Comparative User
    [Show full text]
  • Constructing Visual Representations: Investigating the Use of Tangible Tokens Samuel Huron, Yvonne Jansen, Sheelagh Carpendale
    Constructing Visual Representations: Investigating the Use of Tangible Tokens Samuel Huron, Yvonne Jansen, Sheelagh Carpendale To cite this version: Samuel Huron, Yvonne Jansen, Sheelagh Carpendale. Constructing Visual Representations: Investigating the Use of Tangible Tokens. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 2014, Transactions on Vi- sualization and Computer Graphics, 20 (12), pp.1. <10.1109/TVCG.2014.2346292>. <hal- 01024053> HAL Id: hal-01024053 https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01024053 Submitted on 1 Aug 2014 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destin´eeau d´ep^otet `ala diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publi´esou non, lished or not. The documents may come from ´emanant des ´etablissements d'enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche fran¸caisou ´etrangers,des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou priv´es. Constructing Visual Representations: Investigating the Use of Tangible Tokens Samuel Huron, Yvonne Jansen, Sheelagh Carpendale Fig. 1. Constructing a visualization with tokens: right hand positions tokens, left hand points to the corresponding data. Abstract—The accessibility of infovis authoring tools to a wide audience has been identified as a major research challenge. A key task in the authoring process is the development of visual mappings. While the infovis community has long been deeply interested in finding effective visual mappings, comparatively little attention has been placed on how people construct visual mappings. In this paper, we present the results of a study designed to shed light on how people transform data into visual representations.
    [Show full text]
  • Sheelagh Carpendale
    CURRICULUM VITAE Sheelagh Carpendale Full Professor NSERC/SMART Industrial Research Chair: Interactive Technologies Director: Innovations in Visualization (InnoVis) Co-Director: Interactive Experiences Lab (ixLab) Office: TASC1 9233 Lab: ixLab TASC1 9200 School of Computing Science Simon Fraser University 8888 University Drive Burnaby, British Columbia Canada V5A 1S6 Phone: +1 778 782 5415 Email: [email protected] Web: https:// www.cs.sfu.ca/~sheelagh/ TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 Executive Summary 5 Education 6 Awards 11 Research Overview 13 Employment and Appointments 16 Teaching and Supervision 25 Technology Transfer 27 Grants 31 Service 36 Presentations 44 Publications Sheelagh Carpendale Executive Summary Brief Biography (in 3rd person) Sheelagh Carpendale is a Professor at Simon Fraser University (SFU). She directs the InnoVis (Innovations in Visualization) research group and the newly formed ixLab (Interactive Experiences Lab). Her NSERC/SMART Industrial Research Chair in Interactive Technologies is still current. She has been awarded the IEEE VGTC Visualization Career Award (https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=8570932 ) and is inducted into both the IEEE Visualization Academy (highest and most prestigious honor in the field of visualization) and the ACM CHI Academy, which is an honorary group of individuals who are the principal leaders of the field having led the research and/or innovation in human-computer interaction (https://sigchi.org/awards/sigchi-award-recipients/2018-sigchi-awards/) Formerly, she was at University
    [Show full text]
  • Vislink: Revealing Relationships Amongst Visualizations
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Science Science Research & Publications 2007-05-17 VisLink: Revealing Relationships Amongst Visualizations Collins, Christopher; Carpendale, Sheelagh http://hdl.handle.net/1880/45783 unknown Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca VisLink: Revealing Relationships Amongst Visualizations Christopher Collins1, Sheelagh Carpendale2 1Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto 2Department of Computer Science, University of Calgary Abstract We present VisLink, a method by which visualizations and the relationships be- tween them can be interactively explored. VisLink readily generalizes to support mul- tiple visualizations, empowers inter-representational queries, and enables the reuse of the spatial variables, thus supporting efficient information encoding and providing for powerful visualization bridging. Our approach uses multiple 2D layouts, drawing each one in its own plane. These planes can then be placed and re-positioned at will, side by side, in parallel, or in chosen placements that provide favoured views. Relationships, connections and patterns between visualizations can be revealed. 1 Introduction As information visualizations continue to play a more frequent role in information analysis, the complexity of the queries for which we would like, or even expect, visual explanations also continues to grow. For example, while creating visualizations of multi-variate data re- mains a familiar challenge, the visual portrayal of two set of relationships, one primary and one secondary, within a given visualization is relatively new (e. g. [6, 14, 8]). With VisLink, we extend this latter direction, making it possible reveal relationships between one or more primary visualizations. This enables new types of questions. For example, consider a lin- guistic question such as whether the formal hierarchical structure as expressed through the IS-A relationships in WordNet [13] is reflected by actual semantic similarity from usage statistics.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Workshop on Data Exploration for Interactive Surfaces DEXIS 2011
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265632289 Proceedings of the Workshop on Data Exploration for Interactive Surfaces DEXIS 2011 Article · May 2012 CITATIONS READS 0 56 5 authors, including: Sheelagh Carpendale Tobias Hesselmann The University of Calgary OFFIS 360 PUBLICATIONS 7,311 CITATIONS 16 PUBLICATIONS 200 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Constructive visualization View project Vuzik: Exploring a Medium for Painting Music View project All content following this page was uploaded by Sheelagh Carpendale on 25 March 2016. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Proceedings of the Workshop on Data Exploration for Interactive Surfaces hal-00659469, version 1 - 24 Apr 2012 hal-00659469, version 1 - 24 DEXIS 2011 Petra Isenberg, Sheelagh Carpendale, Tobias Hesselmann, Tobias Isenberg, Bongshin Lee (editors) RESEARCH REPORT N° 0421 May 2012 Project-Teams AVIZ ISSN 0249-6399 ISRN INRIA/RR--0421--FR+ENG hal-00659469, version 1 - 24 Apr 2012 Proceedings of the Workshop on Data Exploration for Interactive Surfaces DEXIS 2011 Petra Isenberg*, Sheelagh Carpendale†, Tobias Hesselmann‡, Tobias Isenberg§, Bongshin Lee¶ (editors) Research Report n° 0421 — May 2012 — 47 pages Abstract: By design, interactive tabletops and surfaces provide numerous opportunities for data visu- alization and analysis. In information visualization, scientific visualization, and visual analytics, useful insights primarily emerge from interactive data exploration. Nevertheless, interaction research in these domains has largely focused on mouse-based interactions in the past, with little research on how interac- tive data exploration can benefit from interactive surfaces.
    [Show full text]
  • International Computer Music Conference (ICMC/SMC)
    Conference Program 40th International Computer Music Conference joint with the 11th Sound and Music Computing conference Music Technology Meets Philosophy: From digital echos to virtual ethos ICMC | SMC |2014 14-20 September 2014, Athens, Greece ICMC|SMC|2014 14-20 September 2014, Athens, Greece Programme of the ICMC | SMC | 2014 Conference 40th International Computer Music Conference joint with the 11th Sound and Music Computing conference Editor: Kostas Moschos PuBlished By: x The National anD KapoDistrian University of Athens Music Department anD Department of Informatics & Telecommunications Panepistimioupolis, Ilissia, GR-15784, Athens, Greece x The Institute for Research on Music & Acoustics http://www.iema.gr/ ADrianou 105, GR-10558, Athens, Greece IEMA ISBN: 978-960-7313-25-6 UOA ISBN: 978-960-466-133-6 Ξ^ĞƉƚĞŵďĞƌϮϬϭϰʹ All copyrights reserved 2 ICMC|SMC|2014 14-20 September 2014, Athens, Greece Contents Contents ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 Sponsors ..................................................................................................................................................... 4 Preface ....................................................................................................................................................... 5 Summer School .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Projections in Context
    Projections in Context Kaye Mason and Sheelagh Carpendale and Brian Wyvill Department of Computer Science, University of Calgary Calgary, Alberta, Canada g g ffkatherim—sheelagh—blob @cpsc.ucalgary.ca Abstract sentation is the technical difficulty in the more mathematical as- pects of projection. This is exactly where computers can be of great This examination considers projections from three space into two assistance to the authors of representations. It is difficult enough to space, and in particular their application in the visual arts and in get all of the angles right in a planar geometric projection. Get- computer graphics, for the creation of image representations of the ting the curves right in a non-planar projection requires a great deal real world. A consideration of the history of projections both in the of skill. An algorithm, however, could provide a great deal of as- visual arts, and in computer graphics gives the background for a sistance. A few computer scientists have realised this, and begun discussion of possible extensions to allow for more author control, work on developing a broader conceptual framework for the imple- and a broader range of stylistic support. Consideration is given mentation of projections, and projection-aiding tools in computer to supporting user access to these extensions and to the potential graphics. utility. This examination considers this problem of projecting a three dimensional phenomenon onto a two dimensional media, be it a Keywords: Computer Graphics, Perspective, Projective Geome- canvas, a tapestry or a computer screen. It begins by examining try, NPR the nature of the problem (Section 2) and then look at solutions that have been developed both by artists (Section 3) and by com- puter scientists (Section 4).
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation of MRI on a Computer Screen Johanna E
    Presentation of MRI on a computer screen Johanna E. van der Heyden, M. Stella Atkins, Kori Inkpen, M. Sheelagh Carpendale Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada, V5A-1S6. ABSTRACT This paper examines the presentation of Magnetic Resonance Images (MRI) on a computer screen. In order to understand the issues involved with the diagnostic-viewing task performed by the radiologist, field observations were obtained in the traditional light screen environment. Requirement issues uncovered included: user control over grouping, size and position of images; navigation of images and image groups; and provision of both presentation detail and presentation context. Existing presentation techniques and variations were explored in order to obtain an initial design direction to address these issues. In particular, the provision of both presentation detail and presentation context was addressed and suitable emphasis layout algorithms examined. An appropriate variable scaling layout algorithm was chosen to provide magnification of selected images while maintaining the contextual images at a smaller scale on the screen at the same time. MR image tolerance levels to presentation distortions inherent in the layout were identified and alternative approaches suggested for further consideration. An initial user feedback study was conducted to determine preference and degree of user enthusiasm to design proposals. Response to the scaling layouts pointed to continuing issues with distortion tolerance and provided further insight into the radiologists’ needs. Trade-off between visualization enhancements and distortions resulting from detail-in-context layouts were examined, a catalog of distortions and tolerances presented and a new variation of the layout algorithm developed. Future work includes more extensive user studies to further determine desirable and undesirable elements of the proposed solutions.
    [Show full text]
  • References Adagha, Ovo, Richard M
    References Adagha, Ovo, Richard M. Levy, and Sheelagh Carpendale. "Towards a product design assessment of visual analytics in decision support applications: a systematic review." Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing (2015): 1-11. Ali, L., Hatala, M., Gašević, D., & Jovanović, J. (2012). A qualitative evaluation of evolution of a learning analytics tool. Computers & Education, 58(1), 470-489. Andrienko, G., Andrienko, N., Burch, M., & Weiskopf, D. (2012). Visual analytics methodology for eye movement studies. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 18(12), 2889-2898. Burtner, R., Bohn, S., & Payne, D. (2013, February). Interactive Visual Comparison of Multimedia Data through Type-specific Views. In IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging (pp. 86540M-86540M). International Society for Optics and Photonics. Bush, Vannevar. “As We May Think”. The Atlantic, July 1, 1945. Chang, R., Ziemkiewicz, C., Green, T. M., & Ribarsky, W. (2009). Defining insight for visual analytics. Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE, 29(2), 14-17 Dear Data. http://www.dea-data.com/all. Accessed 2/29/2016. Diakopoulos, N., Naaman, M., & Kivran-Swaine, F. (2010, October). Diamonds in the rough: Social media visual analytics for journalistic inquiry. In Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST), 2010 IEEE Symposium on (pp. 115-122). IEEE. Forsell, C., & Cooper, M. (2014). An introduction and guide to evaluation of visualization techniques through user studies. In Handbook of Human Centric Visualization (pp. 285-313). Springer New York. Forsell, C., & Johansson, J. (2010, May). An heuristic set for evaluation in information visualization. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (pp. 199-206). ACM. Forsell, C. (2012, July). Evaluation in information visualization: Heuristic evaluation.
    [Show full text]
  • Apply Or Die: on the Role and Assessment of Application Papers in Visualization
    Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Recent Work Title Apply or Die: On the Role and Assessment of Application Papers in Visualization. Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9bd62631 Journal IEEE computer graphics and applications, 37(3) ISSN 0272-1716 Authors Weber, Gunther H Carpendale, Sheelagh Ebert, David et al. Publication Date 2017 DOI 10.1109/mcg.2017.51 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California This is the author’s version submitted to IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications before final editing and layouting. The definitive version of this paper will appear in IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications Volume 37, Number 3, May/June 2017. DISCLAIMER: This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United States Government. While this document is believed to contain correct information, neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor the Regents of the University of California, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by its trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof, or the Regents of the University of California. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof or the Regents of the University of California.
    [Show full text]
  • Empirical Studies in Information Visualization: Seven Scenarios Heidi Lam, Enrico Bertini, Petra Isenberg, Catherine Plaisant, Sheelagh Carpendale
    Empirical Studies in Information Visualization: Seven Scenarios Heidi Lam, Enrico Bertini, Petra Isenberg, Catherine Plaisant, Sheelagh Carpendale To cite this version: Heidi Lam, Enrico Bertini, Petra Isenberg, Catherine Plaisant, Sheelagh Carpendale. Empirical Studies in Information Visualization: Seven Scenarios. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2012, 18 (9), pp.1520–1536. 10.1109/TVCG.2011.279. hal-00932606 HAL Id: hal-00932606 https://hal.inria.fr/hal-00932606 Submitted on 17 Jan 2014 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. JOURNAL SUBMISSION 1 Empirical Studies in Information Visualization: Seven Scenarios Heidi Lam Enrico Bertini Petra Isenberg Catherine Plaisant Sheelagh Carpendale Abstract—We take a new, scenario based look at evaluation in information visualization. Our seven scenarios, evaluating visual data analysis and reasoning, evaluating user performance, evaluating user experience, evaluating environments and work practices, evaluating communication through visualization, evaluating visualization algorithms, and evaluating collaborative data analysis were derived through an extensive literature review of over 800 visualization publications. These scenarios distinguish different study goals and types of research questions and are illustrated through example studies. Through this broad survey and the distillation of these scenarios we make two contributions.
    [Show full text]