Childhood Under Siege
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Second Quarterly Report on Besieged Areas in Syria May 2016
Siege Watch Second Quarterly Report on besieged areas in Syria May 2016 Colophon ISBN/EAN:9789492487018 NUR 698 PAX serial number: PAX/2016/06 About PAX PAX works with committed citizens and partners to protect civilians against acts of war, to end armed violence, and to build just peace. PAX operates independently of political interests. www.paxforpeace.nl / P.O. Box 19318 / 3501 DH Utrecht, The Netherlands / [email protected] About TSI The Syria Institute (TSI) is an independent, non-profit, non-partisan think tank based in Washington, DC. TSI was founded in 2015 in response to a recognition that today, almost six years into the Syrian conflict, information and understanding gaps continue to hinder effective policymaking and drive public reaction to the unfolding crisis. Our aim is to address these gaps by empowering decision-makers and advancing the public’s understanding of the situation in Syria by producing timely, high quality, accessible, data-driven research, analysis, and policy options. To learn more visit www.syriainstitute.org or contact TSI at [email protected]. Photo cover: Women and children spell out ‘SOS’ during a protest in Daraya on 9 March 2016, (Source: courtesy of Local Council of Daraya City) Siege Watch Second Quarterly Report on besieged areas in Syria May 2016 Table of Contents 4 PAX & TSI ! Siege Watch Acronyms 7 Executive Summary 8 Key Findings and Recommendations 9 1. Introduction 12 Project Outline 14 Challenges 15 General Developments 16 2. Besieged Community Overview 18 Damascus 18 Homs 30 Deir Ezzor 35 Idlib 38 Aleppo 38 3. Conclusions and Recommendations 40 Annex I – Community List & Population Data 46 Index of Maps & Tables Map 1. -
FSS Wos Response Analysis
SO1 RESPONSE MARCH 2017 CYCLE Y PEOPLE IN NEED N I 8 B G Food & Livelihood 7.0 7.0 7.0 I 9 7 6.3 6.3 6.3 5.38million Assistance HED OR Food Basket Million C e 6 l Humanitarian Needs Overview (HNO) - 2017 6.16 D SO1 5.8 5.89 5.78 5 N 4 M m 1.16.338m M 5.38 3.35 Target REA September 2015 8.7 Million 5.15 A From within Syria From neighbouring e 4 countries June 2016 9.4 Million WHOLE OF SYRIA ES ES Million peop I nc September 2016 9.0 Million 129,657 3 Cash and Voucher ITI LIFE SUSTAINING AND LIFE SAVING AR ta OVERALL TARGET MARCH 2017 RESPONSE 2 BENEFICIARIES Reached s FOOD ASSISTANCE (SO1) TARGET SO1 Food Basket, Cash & Voucher i Beneficiaries 1 Food Basket, ICI Cash & Voucher - ODAL Additionally, Bread - Flour and Ready to Eat Rations were also Provided ss 7 EF 5.38 0 life sustaining Million M 9 Million OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR N a E nsecure Million Emergency i d B 2 Response (77%) of SO1 Target o 608,654 1.84 M Million Humanitarian Response Plan (HRP) - 2017 2.45million From within Syria From neighbouring od 36°0'0"E 38°0'0"E 40°0'0"E 42°0'0"E Bread-Flour fo countries 7 7 o c 1 Cizre- f 1 0 g! i 0 ng 2 Nusaybin-Al i 2 Kiziltepe-Ad l T U R K E Y Qamishli Peshkabour T U R K E Y Darbasiyah n Ayn al g! ! g! h g Arab Ceylanpinar-Ras c b Al Ayn Al Yaroubiya 170,555 r Islahiye Karkamis-Jarabulus g! - Rabiaa tai Akcakale-Tall ! Emergency Response with 116,265 a g! g! g g! 54,290 u Bab As Abiad Ready to Eat Ration From neighbouring M Salama Cobanbey g! From within Syria - countries ssessed g! g! p sus ) a 1 t e Reyhanli - A L --H A S A K E H fe -
Post-Reconciliation Rural Damascus: Are Local Communities Still Represented?
Post-Reconciliation Rural Damascus: Are Local Communities Still Represented? Mazen Ezzi Wartime and Post-Conflict in Syria (WPCS) Research Project Report 27 November 2020 2020/16 © European University Institute 2020 Content and individual chapters © Mazen Ezzi 2020 This work has been published by the European University Institute, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies. This text may be downloaded only for personal research purposes. Additional reproduction for other purposes, whether in hard copies or electronically, requires the consent of the authors. If cited or quoted, reference should be made to the full name of the author(s), editor(s), the title, the year and the publisher. Requests should be addressed to [email protected]. Views expressed in this publication reflect the opinion of individual authors and not those of the European University Institute. Middle East Directions Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Project Report RSCAS/Middle East Directions 2020/16 27 November 2020 European University Institute Badia Fiesolana I – 50014 San Domenico di Fiesole (FI) www.eui.eu/RSCAS/Publications/ cadmus.eui.eu Funded by the European Union Post-Reconciliation Rural Damascus: Are Local Communities Still Represented? Mazen Ezzi * Mazen Ezzi is a Syrian researcher working on the Wartime and Post-Conflict in Syria (WPCS) project within the Middle East Directions Programme hosted by the Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies at the European University Institute in Florence. Ezzi’s work focuses on the war economy in Syria and regime-controlled areas. This research report was first published in Arabic on 19 November 2020. It was translated into English by Alex Rowell. -
State Institutions and Regime Networks As Service Providers in Syria Joseph Daher, European University Institute (EUI)
Syria Transition Challenges Project Research Project Report (1) State Institutions and Regime Networks as Service Providers in Syria Joseph Daher, European University Institute (EUI) For citation: Daher, Joseph, June 2020 “State Institutions and Regime Networks as Service Providers in Syria: 1 in freefall but still dominant”, Syria Transition Challenges Project, Geneva Centre for Security Policy (GCSP) and European University Institute (EUI) – Middle East Directions, Research Project Report No 1 The Geneva Centre for Security Policy (GCSP) The Geneva Centre for Security Policy (GCSP) is an international foundation established in 1995, with 53 member states, for the primary purpose of promoting peace, security and international cooperation through executive education, applied policy research and dialogue. The GCSP trains government officials, diplomats, military officers, international civil servants and NGO and private sector staff in pertinent fields of international peace and security. EUI – Middle East Directions: The European University Institute (EUI) is a unique international centre for doctorate and post- doctorate studies and research, based in Florence, Italy. Since its founding in 1972 by the six original members of the then European Communities, the EUI has earned a reputation as a leading international academic institution with a European focus. MEDirections was established in January 2016 within the framework of the EUI’s Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies. By promoting multidisciplinary research based on fieldwork findings and collaboration with researchers from the region, it aims to become an international reference point for research on the MENA region, studying socio-political, economic and religious trends and transformations. Syria Transition Challenges Project A multilateral dialogue and research project that aims to build bridges between the EU, Russia, Turkey, and the US on the three issues of Reform, Refugees Return, and Reconstruction. -
Safe Havens in Syria: Missions and Requirements for an Air Campaign
SSP Working Paper July 2012 Safe Havens in Syria: Missions and Requirements for an Air Campaign Brian T. Haggerty Security Studies Program Department of Political Science Massachusetts Institute of Technology [email protected] Copyright © July 15, 2012 by Brian T. Haggerty. This working paper is in draft form and intended for the purposes of discussion and comment. It may not be reproduced without permission of the copyright holder. Copies are available from the author at [email protected]. Thanks to Noel Anderson, Mark Bell, Christopher Clary, Owen Cote, Col. Phil Haun, USAF, Col. Lance A. Kildron, USAF, Barry Posen, Lt. Col. Karl Schloer, USAF, Sidharth Shah, Josh Itzkowitz Shifrinson, Alec Worsnop and members of MIT’s Strategic Use of Force Working Group for their comments and suggestions. All errors are my own. This is a working draft: comments and suggestions are welcome. Introduction Air power remains the arm of choice for Western policymakers contemplating humanitarian military intervention. Although the early 1990s witnessed ground forces deployed to northern Iraq, Somalia, and Haiti to protect civilians and ensure the provision of humanitarian aid, interveners soon embraced air power for humanitarian contingencies. In Bosnia, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization’s (NATO’s) success in combining air power with local ground forces to coerce the Serbs to the negotiating table at Dayton in 1995 suggested air power could help provide an effective response to humanitarian crises that minimized the risks of armed intervention.1 And though NATO’s -
Regional Response to the Syria Humanitarian Crisis 9
9 - 24 October 2013 Regional Response to the Syria Humanitarian29 August - 12 Crisis1 September February 20132013 IOM provided gas stoves to 89 newly-arrived households (463 individuals) in Domiz camp. To date, 56,058 Syrian refugees and Iraqi returnees from Syria have benefitted from IOM’s NFI distributions. © IOM 2013. HIGHLIGHTS Syria: On 15 - 17 October, IOM assisted around 1,400 beneficiaries in Qudsaya, who fled from Moudamiyyah (which was under siege for months) with essential NFIs includ- ing: hygiene kits, mattresses, jerry cans and clothing items. Iraq: On 22 October, IOM identified 50 Syrians in Duhok governorate to begin vocation- al training. Jordan: IOM vaccinated 2,765 refugees against Measles and 1,058 refugees against Po- lio. Since March 2013, 71,146 Syrian refugees have been vaccinated against Measles and Polio upon arrival to Za’atri camp. Turkey: IOM and partners transported 493 Syrian nationals from Adiyaman camp to medical facilities and social service centres. Lebanon: IOM provided psychosocial support to 988 individuals through a mobile team in South Lebanon and at a community centre in Baalbek town. 1 IOM OPERATIONS IN SYRIA IOM, in cooperation with the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies and Swiss Red Cross, provided a five-day Training of Trainers workshop on shelter interventions for 22 humanitarian workers. © IOM 2013 Identification and Assessment of Emergency Collective Shelters for Rehabilitation: During the reporting period, IOM identified 87 shelters in Homs (13), Rural Damascus (11), Dier Al Zour (10), Al Hassakeh (9), Tartous (9), Qunei- tra (8), Aleppo (7), Dar’a (7), Hama (7), and Damascus (6) for consideration for the next rehabilitation work plan to start on which will start by next week. -
SYRIA Damascus/Damascus Governorate
I Complex SYRIA Æ Emergency Damascus/Damascus Governorate Imagery analysis: 3 December 2017 | Published Friday, January 12, 2018 | Version 1.0 CE20130604SYR 36°20'0"E 36°21'0"E 36°22'0"E 36°23'0"E 36°24'0"E T U R K E Y INSET: 2 April 2016 HARASTA MISRABA t ten ¥¦¬ Ex S Y R I A sis MODIRA aly An ¥¦¬Beirut I R A Q ¥¦¬Damascus Map location ¥¦¬ ¥¦¬ ARBIN Damage density of Damascus, Kafr INSET: 3 DecemBbeEr I2T01 S7 AWA Batna and Irbin subdistricts, Damascus Governorate, Syria N " Jobar 0 ' This map illustrates satellite-detected damage density 2 3 ° 3 3 in the subdistricts of Kafr Batna and Irbin and in the N " 0 ' eastern part of Damascus city, Syrian Arab Republic. 2 3 ° 3 Using satellite imagery acquired 3 December 2017 and DAMASCUS 3 2 April 2016, UNITAR - UNOSAT identified a total of 12,541 affected structures. Approximately 3,853 of these were destroyed, 5,141 severely damaged, and 3,547 moderately damaged. Comparison with the ZAMALKA previous UNOSAT analysis using imagery from 2 April HAMMURA 2016 shows an overall increase of 6% in the number of damaged buildings since 2016. The areas with a higher increase in the percentage of damage are Ein Tarma (14% increase), Hammura (15% increase) and Kafr Batna (17 % increase). Moreover, approximately 7% of the buildings damaged as of April 2016 have Al Maamouniye been targeted again and suffered additional damage. The majority of these buildings are located in Ein Tarma, Jobar and Al Maamouniye. This is a preliminary N " HEZZEH analysis and has not yet been validated in the field. -
Tenth Quarterly Report Part 1 – Eastern Ghouta February
Tenth Quarterly Report Part 1 – Eastern Ghouta February – April 2018 Colophon ISBN: 978-94-92487-29-2 NUR 689 PAX serial number: PAX/2018/05 Photo cover: “A raid killed my dream, and a raid killed my future, and a raid killed everything alive inside of me, while I was watching.” - Wael al-Tawil, Douma, 20 February 2018 About PAX PAX works with committed citizens and partners to protect civilians against acts of war, to end armed violence, and to build just peace. PAX operates independently of political interests. www.paxforpeace.nl / P.O. Box 19318 / 3501 DH Utrecht, The Netherlands / [email protected] This report was written by Valerie Szybala with support from the PAX team. It would not have been possible without the participation of Siege Watch’s voluntary network of reporting contacts on the ground. This past quarter, Siege Watch contacts from Eastern Ghouta continued to provide updates and information with the project during the darkest period of their lives. Thank you to everyone from Eastern Ghouta who communicated with the project team over the years, for your openness, generosity and patience. We have been inspired and humbled by your strength through adversity, and will continue to support your search for justice and peace. Siege Watch Tenth Quarterly Report Part 1 – Eastern Ghouta February – April 2018 PAX ! Siege Watch - Tenth Quarterly Report Part 1 – Eastern Ghouta 3 Table of Contents Executive Summary 06 Introduction 10 Eastern Ghouta 12 Background 12 Military Developments 14 Stages of the Final Offensive 18 Chemical Weapons -
EASTERN and WESTERN GHOUTA SARIN ATTACK INTRODUCTION 1. Chemical Weapons Attacks Were Conducted in the Early Hours of 21 Augus
EASTERN AND WESTERN GHOUTA SARIN ATTACK INTRODUCTION 1. Chemical weapons attacks were conducted in the early hours of 21 August 2013 on Eastern and Western Ghouta in the Syrian Arab Republic (‘Syria’). 2. The attacks on Ghouta, with the nerve agent sarin, are the deadliest chemical attacks in the Syrian conflict. 3. Evidence collected in the immediate aftermath of the attacks, and over the last seven years, demonstrates that the Syrian government carried out the attacks. 4. This document summarizes portions of an evidentiary brief supporting a criminal complaint filed by the Open Society Justice Initiative, Syrian Center for Media and Freedom of Expression, Syrian Archive and Civil Rights Defenders on behalf of victims of the chemical attacks on Ghouta. • First, this document details the use of chemical weapons on Eastern and Western Ghouta on 21 August 2013. • Second, it analyzes evidence supporting attribution of responsibility to the Syrian government, and identifies specific persons alleged to have had a role in the chemical attacks. • Third, it places the chemical attacks on Ghouta within the Syrian government’s broader strategy and deliberate violence against civilians in opposition-held areas. • Finally, it discusses the use of chemical weapons in these attacks as a war crime and crime against humanity. 5. The complaint calls on the Swedish Police Authority and Swedish Prosecution Authority to investigate the use of chemical weapons in Ghouta as an international crime, and to pursue an arrest warrant against the suspected perpetrators. THE USE OF CHEMICAL WEAPONS IN THE GHOUTAS 6. The chemical attacks on 21 August 2013 targeted two suburbs of Damascus. -
Timeline of International Response to the Situation in Syria
Timeline of International Response to the Situation in Syria Beginning with dates of a few key events that initiated the unrest in March 2011, this timeline provides a chronological list of important news and actions from local, national, and international actors in response to the situation in Syria. Skip to: [2012] [2013] [2014] [2015] [2016] [Most Recent] Acronyms: EU – European Union PACE – Parliamentary Assembly of the Council CoI – UN Commission of Inquiry on Syria of Europe FSA – Free Syrian Army SARC – Syrian Arab Red Crescent GCC – Gulf Cooperation Council SASG – Special Adviser to the Secretary- HRC – UN Human Rights Council General HRW – Human Rights Watch SES – UN Special Envoy for Syria ICC – International Criminal Court SOC – National Coalition of Syrian Revolution ICRC – International Committee of the Red and Opposition Forces Cross SOHR – Syrian Observatory for Human Rights IDPs – Internally Displaced People SNC – Syrian National Council IHL – International Humanitarian Law UN – United Nations ISIL – Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant UNESCO – UN Educational, Scientific and ISSG – International Syria Support Group Cultural Organization JSE – UN-Arab League Joint Special Envoy to UNGA – UN General Assembly Syria UNHCR – UN High Commissioner for LAS – League of Arab States Refugees NATO – North Atlantic Treaty Organization UNICEF – UN Children’s Fund OCHA – UN Office for the Coordination of UNRWA – UN Relief Works Agency for Humanitarian Affairs Palestinian Refugees OIC – Organization of Islamic Cooperation UNSC – UN Security Council OHCHR – UN Office of the High UNSG – UN Secretary-General Commissioner for Human Rights UNSMIS – UN Supervision Mission in Syria OPCW – Organization for the Prohibition of US – United States Chemical Weapons 2011 2011: Mar 16 – Syrian security forces arrest roughly 30 of 150 people gathered in Damascus’ Marjeh Square for the “Day of Dignity” protest, demanding the release of imprisoned relatives held as political prisoners. -
REGIONAL ANALYSIS SYRIA Forces Took Control of the Strategic Village of Kasab in Lattakia and Its Border Crossing with Turkey
north and the capital. A week after losing control of Yabroud, the opposition REGIONAL ANALYSIS SYRIA forces took control of the strategic village of Kasab in Lattakia and its border crossing with Turkey. This conflict continues as SAF responded with heavy aerial 04 April 2014 bombardment and the redeployment of troops to the area. Meanwhile ISIL withdrew from many areas in northern and Western Aleppo (Hreitan, Azaz, Part I – Syria Mennegh) and Idleb by the end of February after months of clashes with rival Content Part I This Regional Analysis of the Syria conflict (RAS) fighters. The ISIL fighters have mostly moved to eastern Aleppo (Menbij, Al-Bab is now produced quarterly, replacing the monthly Overview and Jarablus), Ar-Raqqa, and Al-Hasakeh. This withdrawal was coupled with RAS of 2013. It seeks to bring together How to use the RAS? increased violence on the borders with Turkey. information from all sources in the region and Possible developments provide holistic analysis of the overall Syria Main events timeline Access: In early February a group of independent UN experts reported that crisis. Information gaps and data limitations deprivation of basic necessities and denial of humanitarian relief has become a While Part I focuses on the situation within Syria, Operational constraints widespread tactic utilised in the Syrian conflict. This includes deliberate attacks Part II covers the impact of the crisis on Humanitarian profile on medical facilities and staff; cutting off of water supplies and attacks on water neighbouring countries. Map - Conflict developments More information on how to use this document facilities; actions to destroy harvests and kill livestock – all of which obstructs Displacement profile can be found on page 2. -
Allocation Strategy Syria Humanitarian Fund 2019 1St Standard Allocation
Allocation Strategy Syria Humanitarian Fund 2019 1st Standard Allocation I. Allocation Overview Project Proposal Deadline: 15 September 2019 23:59, Damascus Time A) Introduction / Humanitarian situation 1. The Syria Humanitarian Fund (SHF) is a Country-Based Pooled Fund (CBPF) managed by the Humanitarian Financing Unit (HFU) of the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) based in Damascus. Established in 2014, under the leadership of the Humanitarian Coordinator a.i. for Syria, its role is to support life-saving, protection, and life-sustaining activities by filling critical funding gaps; promote the needs-based delivery of assistance in accordance with humanitarian principles; improve the relevance and coherence of humanitarian response by strategically funding priorities as identified in the HRP; and expand the rapid delivery of assistance to underserved, high severity and hard-to-reach areas by partnering with the best placed actors.1 2. On 20 June, the SHF Advisory Board agreed to allocate US $25 million under the First Standard Allocation to support life-saving activities and service delivery in underserved areas of southern Syria – specifically, Dar’a, Quneitra and Rural Damascus (with a focus on eastern Ghouta) – where severe humanitarian needs persist. The decision came following a detailed prioritization exercise undertaken by the Inter Sector Coordination (ISC) group in Syria which involved a multi-factor analysis of levels of need (with an emphasis on highest severity need areas); accessibility (both in terms of newly-accessible and access-restricted locations); population movement (focusing on those locations where there is a high concentration of both IDPs and returnees); presence and functionality of basic services (including health and education facilities), and coverage (in terms of people reached).