DOCSLIB.ORG

Preparing for Vega

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

N°23 - September 2001 PreparingPreparing forfor Editorial oming back after fifteen years to take VVega...ega... C charge of the Directorate of Launchers makes me feel rather like a latter-day Ulysses. Like him, I am struck by the magnitude of the changes that have taken place. I remembered Launchers as an engineers’ paradise, but find myself in a hard-nosed business world. There have been some revolutionary changes. Firstly, we’ve had a commercial revolution, the signal for which, in Europe, was given with the creation of Arianespace. Secondly, there is structural revolution, with vertical industry consolidation in the USA and Europe. At the same time, a far-reaching cultural revolution has taken place. Just try to imagine fifteen years ago someone suggesting that Russian rocket engines might be used in US Air Force launchers! Amidst all these changes, things have been remarkably quiet on one front: most of the technology we use today dates back fifteen years. This is a challenge that has yet to be faced. Ariane is a paragon of excellence in Europe. If we are going to consolidate and build on it, the launcher sector must adapt to the larger world around us. We need to broaden the role played by governments, including strategic investment and market intervention. We need to open the sector to international cooperation, while strengthening European solidarity. Finally, we must greatly accelerate the development of new technologies. ■ Jean-Jacques Dordain Director of Launchers European Space Agency http://www.esa.int/launchers Directorate of Launchers Reaching for the Skies News in brief… at Ma NEWS IN BRIEF 2 Major firsts for Envisat • Major firsts for Envisat •Busy schedule leading up to arrived on an Ministerial Council Antonov aircraft in • Kourou gets boost from EPCU-S5 two parts: the • Beluga delivers choice caviar Service Module, INTERVIEW 4 y responsible for with Jean-Jacques Dordain r keeping the satellite • The new Director talks about operational, and a Europe’s launcher industry and his the Payload Module vision for the future housing the actual m PREPARING FOR VEGA 6 mission instruments. •A report from Fiatavio’s Colleferro Measuring some m manufacturing complex ten metres high Vega team roster completed 10 u • Perspectives from Stefano Bianchi once assembled, s and Mauro Balduccini Envisat will call for a Two tried-and-tested stands 12 large fairing. This is for the new launcher going to be a first, • Focus on the test stands on Sardinia as is the use of the and in Kourou brand-new EPCU LIFTING THE BONNET ON 14 payload preparation ARIANE-5 complex (see facing •A survey of the major launch page). Only two of missions as presented at the Paris the three rooms will Air Show in June be used: ES5-C for A NEW WINDOW ON 16 satellite integra- THE STARS tion/verification and •Take a spin in cyberspace The Envisat campaign was ushered in ES5-A for filling with propellants. The on 26 March with the arrival in campaign continued through to French Guiana, on container ship “Le 14 July with a break until Toucan”, of various items of ground mid-August; the launch MORE Reaching for the Skies equipment. More followed as air is scheduled for the end of on the Contributions (in English or French) should be sent to ■ WEB the coordinator: cargo on 9 and 16 May. Envisat itself the year. Philippe Willekens, ESA - D/Launchers 8-10, rue Mario-Nikis, F-75738 Paris Phone: (33)1 5369 7388 Fax: (33)1 5369 7678 E- mail: [email protected] Busy schedule leading up to Writing: Michel Guyon Editors: Bruce Battrick & Huguette Sawaya Ministerial Council Layout: Eva Ekstrand Illustrations : Richard Roussel Business scheduled for the November Ministerial meeting of the ESA Council Photos: ESA-CNES-Arianespace-Service optique CSG, includes many decisions awaited regarding launchers: Ariane-5 Plus develop- Air Liquide, Cyospace, Snecma Moteurs Photo reportage (pages 6 to 11): Daniella Theis ment, funding to meet the fixed costs of the CSG and the Ariane launch sites, the Ariane Research and Technology Accompaniment programme and the reusable Published and distributed by: ESA Publications Division – ESTEC, launcher issue, plus the response to Russia’s request to launch Soyuz from Kourou. Keplerlaan 1, 2200 AG Noordwijk – The Netherlands In the meantime, attention is focussing on preparing for these decisions, at two Phone: (+31)71 565 3400 levels. To deal with matters specific to launchers, the Ariane Launcher Programme Fax: (+31)71 565 5433 Board will be meeting monthly. In parallel, a Council Working Group - likewise © 2001 European Space Agency meeting monthly but addressing the broader agenda - will integrate “launcher” Printed in The Netherlands ISSN 1013-9041 business with that relating to the “Space Station”, “Applications” and “Science”. ■ 2 EUROPEAN SPACE AGENCY ch 25 News in brief… at Mach 25 can be conducted simultaneously at the EPCU. Its great asset is its air- cushioned payload transit passages between the three main clean rooms. And while the satellite constellations that this configuration was designed to handle are now on hold, the EPCU, with its 3000 m2 of clean rooms and 20 metre high ceiling, will not be lying idle. “With the larger spacecraft now on the way, this is no luxury,” says Philippe Rolland. Especially as the complex will also have to accommo- date the nine Automated Transfer Vehicles (ATVs) intended for servicing the International Space Station. Kourou gets boost from EPCU-S5 “We would never have been able to prepare ATVs in the old rooms. While With the opening of the EPCU-S5 in check out their hardware. The payload four-to-five tonne satellites can be Kourou, things will never quite be the would then be transferred by lorry to handled using standard gantries, same again. Inaugurated only an area a safe distance away from things are quite different when you’re recently, the new payload preparation office buildings for fuelling. “In each manoeuvring gigantic hardware complex - cofunded by ESA (30%) and case, precious time was wasted on weighing over 20 tonnes,” explains Arianespace (70%) - will radically alter packing and unpacking,” explains Rolland. how things are done at Europe’s Philippe Rolland, Arianespace mission Thanks to these unique assets, EPCU- Space Port. manager. The operation was then S5 should make it possible in the short Until now, satellites were accommo- repeated for the journey to the final term to increase turnaround dated in the first instance in a building assembly building. rates, now that Kourou has MORE on the reserved for non-hazardous opera- But from now on, while the trip goes four filling rooms instead of tions. There, the customers would via the BAF, all preparatory operations just one. ■ WEB Beluga delivers choice caviar! Munich airport, 28 February. Rather like an Ariane-5 whose fairing parts to release its payload, the “Beluga” Airbus half opens to deliver its cargo. The comparison is apt enough, as the cargo in question is none other than the dynamic model of the ESC-A cryogenic upper stage – the upgrade soon to be fitted to Ariane-5. It will have taken Astrium five months to complete its integration, in Bremen (D). What is more, a new multi-purpose integration stand was also inaugurated and validated in the process. Next stop for the ESC-A: a campaign of tests at IABG in Ottobrunn (D). ■ Directorate of Launchers 3 Reaching for the Skies Interview with the new Director of Launchers Jean-Jacques Dordain Last February able amount of attention to the Jean-Jacques Delegations. This type of contact is a crucial part of the preparations for a Dordain replaced Ministerial Council. Delegations need Frederick Engström to understand the logic behind our at ESA’s Directorate proposals, and we need to under- of Launchers. In an stand what they expect from the launcher programmes. interview with RFS he talks about his Vega – your first major first impressions task? This programme was decided just two and his personal months before I arrived, so it was my management style, predecessor who should be credited gives his take on with rallying the support needed to the current market, initiate this programme. Now we have to start constructional work, looking and outlines his ahead to 2005 and the first launch. strategy. This will be the first time that ESA will be managing the technical side of the development of a launcher, so it is a real challenge. I have already detected in what’s going on. So I a lot of enthusiasm, among the ESA hold weekly meetings with teams as well as in industry. all the staff, reviewing what was discussed the Looking further ahead, previous week, the results, what is your assessment of and the prospects for the the global market for Tell us a bit about your first upcoming week. I hope that it helps launchers? few months on the job. them in their work. The market is changing very rapidly. I’m still in the learning stage. The Today it consists mainly of large important thing for me is to establish a And outside the geostationary communications satel- close relationship with my new Directorate? lites. But parallel to this coveted colleagues. I’m someone who prefers I thoroughly enjoyed the conceptual segment, there is also a smaller, much talking to people around a table, work that I did in the Strategy more diverse institutional market that rather than on the phone or by e-mail. Directorate, but it’s worlds apart from includes scientific satellites and inter- So I don’t even have a computer in my working with a roaring engine on a planetary probes, but also the ATV for office! I’m trying to apply what I launcher.
Recommended publications
  • Project Number: JMW-USC1

    Project Number: JMW-USC1

    Project Number: JMW-USC1 Department of Social Science and Policy Studies THE FUTURE OF UNMANNED SPACE: A SPECULATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE COMMERCIAL MARKET An Interactive Qualifying Project Report: Submitted to the Faculty of the WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science by ______________________________ Peter Brayshaw ______________________________ Brooks Farnham ______________________________ Jon Leslie December 16, 2004 _____________________________ ________________________________ Professor John M. Wilkes, Advisor Professor Peter Campisano, Co-Advisor Abstract: This report is one of many which deal with the unmanned space race. It is a prediction of who will have the greatest competitive advantage in the commercial market over the next 25 years, based on historical analogy. Background information on Russia, China, Japan, the United States and the European Space Agency, including the launch vehicles and launch services each provides, is covered. The new prospect of space platforms is also investigated. 2 Table of Contents Abstract: ...................................................................................................... 2 Table of Contents ......................................................................................... 3 Introduction ................................................................................................. 5 Literature Review ...................................................................................... 5 Project
  • View / Download

    View / Download

    www.arianespace.com www.starsem.com www.avio Arianespace’s eighth launch of 2021 with the fifth Soyuz of the year will place its satellite passengers into low Earth orbit. The launcher will be carrying a total payload of approximately 5 518 kg. The launch will be performed from Baikonur, in Kazakhstan. MISSION DESCRIPTION 2 ONEWEB SATELLITES 3 Liftoff is planned on at exactly: SOYUZ LAUNCHER 4 06:23 p.m. Washington, D.C. time, 10:23 p.m. Universal time (UTC), LAUNCH CAMPAIGN 4 00:23 a.m. Paris time, FLIGHT SEQUENCES 5 01:23 a.m. Moscow time, 03:23 a.m. Baikonur Cosmodrome. STAKEHOLDERS OF A LAUNCH 6 The nominal duration of the mission (from liftoff to separation of the satellites) is: 3 hours and 45 minutes. Satellites: OneWeb satellite #255 to #288 Customer: OneWeb • Altitude at separation: 450 km Cyrielle BOUJU • Inclination: 84.7degrees [email protected] +33 (0)6 32 65 97 48 RUAG Space AB (Linköping, Sweden) is the prime contractor in charge of development and production of the dispenser system used on Flight ST34. It will carry the satellites during their flight to low Earth orbit and then release them into space. The dedicated dispenser is designed to Flight ST34, the 29th commercial mission from the Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan performed by accommodate up to 36 spacecraft per launch, allowing Arianespace and its Starsem affiliate, will put 34 of OneWeb’s satellites bringing the total fleet to 288 satellites Arianespace to timely deliver the lion’s share of the initial into a near-polar orbit at an altitude of 450 kilometers.
  • Design by Contract: the Lessons of Ariane

    Design by Contract: the Lessons of Ariane

    . Editor: Bertrand Meyer, EiffelSoft, 270 Storke Rd., Ste. 7, Goleta, CA 93117; voice (805) 685-6869; [email protected] several hours (at least in earlier versions of Ariane), it was better to let the computa- tion proceed than to stop it and then have Design by to restart it if liftoff was delayed. So the SRI computation continues for 50 seconds after the start of flight mode—well into the flight period. After takeoff, of course, this com- Contract: putation is useless. In the Ariane 5 flight, Object Technology however, it caused an exception, which was not caught and—boom. The exception was due to a floating- point error during a conversion from a 64- The Lessons bit floating-point value, representing the flight’s “horizontal bias,” to a 16-bit signed integer: In other words, the value that was converted was greater than what of Ariane can be represented as a 16-bit signed inte- ger. There was no explicit exception han- dler to catch the exception, so it followed the usual fate of uncaught exceptions and crashed the entire software, hence the onboard computers, hence the mission. This is the kind of trivial error that we Jean-Marc Jézéquel, IRISA/CNRS are all familiar with (raise your hand if you Bertrand Meyer, EiffelSoft have never done anything of this sort), although fortunately the consequences are usually less expensive. How in the world everal contributions to this made up of respected experts from major department have emphasized the European countries, which produced a How in the world could importance of design by contract report in hardly more than a month.
  • The Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2012

    The Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2012

    Federal Aviation Administration The Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2012 February 2013 About FAA About the FAA Office of Commercial Space Transportation The Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation (FAA AST) licenses and regulates U.S. commercial space launch and reentry activity, as well as the operation of non-federal launch and reentry sites, as authorized by Executive Order 12465 and Title 51 United States Code, Subtitle V, Chapter 509 (formerly the Commercial Space Launch Act). FAA AST’s mission is to ensure public health and safety and the safety of property while protecting the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States during commercial launch and reentry operations. In addition, FAA AST is directed to encourage, facilitate, and promote commercial space launches and reentries. Additional information concerning commercial space transportation can be found on FAA AST’s website: http://www.faa.gov/go/ast Cover art: Phil Smith, The Tauri Group (2013) NOTICE Use of trade names or names of manufacturers in this document does not constitute an official endorsement of such products or manufacturers, either expressed or implied, by the Federal Aviation Administration. • i • Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation Dear Colleague, 2012 was a very active year for the entire commercial space industry. In addition to all of the dramatic space transportation events, including the first-ever commercial mission flown to and from the International Space Station, the year was also a very busy one from the government’s perspective. It is clear that the level and pace of activity is beginning to increase significantly.
  • The European Launchers Between Commerce and Geopolitics

    The European Launchers Between Commerce and Geopolitics

    The European Launchers between Commerce and Geopolitics Report 56 March 2016 Marco Aliberti Matteo Tugnoli Short title: ESPI Report 56 ISSN: 2218-0931 (print), 2076-6688 (online) Published in March 2016 Editor and publisher: European Space Policy Institute, ESPI Schwarzenbergplatz 6 • 1030 Vienna • Austria http://www.espi.or.at Tel. +43 1 7181118-0; Fax -99 Rights reserved – No part of this report may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or for any purpose with- out permission from ESPI. Citations and extracts to be published by other means are subject to mentioning “Source: ESPI Report 56; March 2016. All rights reserved” and sample transmission to ESPI before publishing. ESPI is not responsible for any losses, injury or damage caused to any person or property (including under contract, by negligence, product liability or otherwise) whether they may be direct or indirect, special, inciden- tal or consequential, resulting from the information contained in this publication. Design: Panthera.cc ESPI Report 56 2 March 2016 The European Launchers between Commerce and Geopolitics Table of Contents Executive Summary 5 1. Introduction 10 1.1 Access to Space at the Nexus of Commerce and Geopolitics 10 1.2 Objectives of the Report 12 1.3 Methodology and Structure 12 2. Access to Space in Europe 14 2.1 European Launchers: from Political Autonomy to Market Dominance 14 2.1.1 The Quest for European Independent Access to Space 14 2.1.3 European Launchers: the Current Family 16 2.1.3 The Working System: Launcher Strategy, Development and Exploitation 19 2.2 Preparing for the Future: the 2014 ESA Ministerial Council 22 2.2.1 The Path to the Ministerial 22 2.2.2 A Look at Europe’s Future Launchers and Infrastructure 26 2.2.3 A Revolution in Governance 30 3.
  • Paper Session II-A-Current Status of the Ariane 4 Program and of The

    Paper Session II-A-Current Status of the Ariane 4 Program and of The

    1994 (31st) Space Exploration and Utilization The Space Congress® Proceedings for the Good of the World Apr 27th, 1:00 PM - 4:00 PM Paper Session II-A - Current Status of the Ariane 4 Program and of the Ariane 5 Development James R. Youdale Arianespace Inc. Washington, D.C. Douglas A. Heydon Arianespace Inc. Washington, D.C. Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings Scholarly Commons Citation Youdale, James R. and Heydon, Douglas A., "Paper Session II-A - Current Status of the Ariane 4 Program and of the Ariane 5 Development" (1994). The Space Congress® Proceedings. 16. https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings/proceedings-1994-31st/april-27-1994/16 This Event is brought to you for free and open access by the Conferences at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Space Congress® Proceedings by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Current Status of the Ariane 4 Program and of the Ariane 5 Development James R. Youdale1 and Douglas A. Heyden~ Arianespace Inc. Washington, D.C. Abstract This paper provides an overview of the commercial siruation of Arianespace, a general update regarding its technical and operational activities and its near and medium term prospects. A summary of the Ariane 4 "track record" is given and the latest improvement to its third staae the HIO III, is presented. Operational improvements that reduce the interval between two = ' consecutive laWlches are also addressed. The ratiollale for going to Ariane 5 is discussed and the current status of the Ariane 5 development program is reviewed.
  • Launch Vehicle Control Center Architectures

    Launch Vehicle Control Center Architectures

    Launch Vehicle Control Center Architectures Michael D. Watson1, Amy Epps2, and Van Woodruff3 NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, AL 35812 Michael Jacob Vachon4 NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX 77058 Julio Monreal5 European Space Agency, Launchers Directorate, Paris, France Marl Levesque6 United Launch Alliance, Vandenberg AFB and Randall Williams7 and Tom McLaughlin8 Aerospace Corporation, El Segundo, CA 90245 Launch vehicles within the international community vary greatly in their configuration and processing. Each launch site has a unique processing flow based on the specific launch vehicle configuration. Launch and flight operations are managed through a set of control centers associated with each launch site. Each launch site has a control center for launch operations; however flight operations support varies from being co-located with the launch site to being shared with the space vehicle control center. There is also a nuance of some having an engineering support center which may be co-located with either the launch or flight control center, or in a separate geographical location altogether. A survey of control center architectures is presented for various launch vehicles including the NASA Space Launch System (SLS), United Launch Alliance (ULA) Atlas V and Delta IV, and the European Space Agency (ESA) Ariane 5. Each of these control center architectures shares some similarities in basic structure while differences in functional distribution also exist. The driving functions which lead to these factors are considered and a model of control center architectures is proposed which supports these commonalities and variations. I. INTRODUCTION Launch vehicles in both Europe and the United States have been operating successfully for several decades.
  • MIT Japan Program Working Paper 01.10 the GLOBAL COMMERCIAL

    MIT Japan Program Working Paper 01.10 the GLOBAL COMMERCIAL

    MIT Japan Program Working Paper 01.10 THE GLOBAL COMMERCIAL SPACE LAUNCH INDUSTRY: JAPAN IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE Saadia M. Pekkanen Assistant Professor Department of Political Science Middlebury College Middlebury, VT 05753 [email protected] I am grateful to Marco Caceres, Senior Analyst and Director of Space Studies, Teal Group Corporation; Mark Coleman, Chemical Propulsion Information Agency (CPIA), Johns Hopkins University; and Takashi Ishii, General Manager, Space Division, The Society of Japanese Aerospace Companies (SJAC), Tokyo, for providing basic information concerning launch vehicles. I also thank Richard Samuels and Robert Pekkanen for their encouragement and comments. Finally, I thank Kartik Raj for his excellent research assistance. Financial suppport for the Japan portion of this project was provided graciously through a Postdoctoral Fellowship at the Harvard Academy of International and Area Studies. MIT Japan Program Working Paper Series 01.10 Center for International Studies Massachusetts Institute of Technology Room E38-7th Floor Cambridge, MA 02139 Phone: 617-252-1483 Fax: 617-258-7432 Date of Publication: July 16, 2001 © MIT Japan Program Introduction Japan has been seriously attempting to break into the commercial space launch vehicles industry since at least the mid 1970s. Yet very little is known about this story, and about the politics and perceptions that are continuing to drive Japanese efforts despite many outright failures in the indigenization of the industry. This story, therefore, is important not just because of the widespread economic and technological merits of the space launch vehicles sector which are considerable. It is also important because it speaks directly to the ongoing debates about the Japanese developmental state and, contrary to the new wisdom in light of Japan's recession, the continuation of its high technology policy as a whole.
  • Design and Launch Alternatives

    Design and Launch Alternatives

    Chapter 4 Lightsats Lightsats are satellites that are light enough to be to shoot them down,’ said Dr. John Mansfield, launched by small launch vehicles such as a Scout or while Director of DARPA’s Aerospace and Strate- Pegasus, or others now in development. Military gic Technology Office.3 lightsats could be designed for wartime deployment or replenishment from survivable transportable launch- SPACECRAFT CONCEPTS ers to support theater commanders. Civil lightsats, The first lightsat developed by DARPA’s Ad- and some military ones, would not require transport- vanced Satellite Technology Program was a commu- able launchers; they could be launched by a wider nications satellite, the Global Low-Orbit Message variety of launch vehicles, including larger ones. Relay (GLOMR; see figure 4-l). Weighing only 150 The first Soviet and U.S. satellites were lightsats, lb, GLOMR was launched by the Space Shuttle on according to this definition. Explorer I, the first U.S. October 31, 1985, into a 200-mile-high orbit in- satellite, weighed only 31 lb but collected data that clined 57 by degrees. led to the discovery of the Van Allen radiation belt. DARPA has ordered nine more UHF communica- But in another sense, the first satellites were fat—as tion satellites from Defense Systems, Inc., the heavy as early launch vehicles could launch. As larger launch vehicles were developed, larger, more contractor that built the GLOMR. Seven of these, called Microsats, will weigh approximately 50 lb capable satellites were developed to ride them. each. These satellites will be launched together into Nevertheless, small satellites continue to be launched for civil and military applications that a polar orbit 400 nautical miles high by the Pegasus launch vehicle.
  • Sale Price Drives Potential Effects on DOD and Commercial Launch Providers

    Sale Price Drives Potential Effects on DOD and Commercial Launch Providers

    United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Addressees August 2017 SURPLUS MISSILE MOTORS Sale Price Drives Potential Effects on DOD and Commercial Launch Providers Accessible Version GAO-17-609 August 2017 SURPLUS MISSILE MOTORS Sale Price Drives Potential Effects on DOD and Commercial Launch Providers Highlights of GAO-17-609, a report to congressional addressees Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found The U.S. government spends over a The Department of Defense (DOD) could use several methods to set the sale billion dollars each year on launch prices of surplus intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) motors that could be activities as it strives to help develop a converted and used in vehicles for commercial launch if current rules prohibiting competitive market for space launches such sales were changed. One method would be to determine a breakeven and assure its access to space. Among price. Below this price, DOD would not recuperate its costs, and, above this others, one launch option is to use price, DOD would potentially save. GAO estimated that DOD could sell three vehicles derived from surplus ICBM Peacekeeper motors—the number required for one launch, or, a “motor set”—at motors such as those used on the Peacekeeper and Minuteman missiles. a breakeven price of about $8.36 million and two Minuteman II motors for about The Commercial Space Act of 1998 $3.96 million, as shown below. Other methods for determining motor prices, such prohibits the use of these motors for as fair market value as described in the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory commercial launches and limits their Board Handbook, resulted in stakeholder estimates ranging from $1.3 million per use in government launches in part to motor set to $11.2 million for a first stage Peacekeeper motor.
  • User's Manual If Any

    User's Manual If Any

    User’s Manual Issue 2/ Revision 0 September 2004 Approved and issued by ARIANESPACE Edouard Perez Senior Vice President Engineering Washington, D.C.,U.S.A. Singapore Siège social / Headquarters Tel : +33 1 60 87 60 00 Tel : +1 202 628-3936 Tel : +65 223 6426 Boulevard de l'Europe Fax : +33 1 60 87 62 47 Fax : +1 202 628-3949 Fax : +65 223 4268 B.P. 177 Tokyo Kourou 91006 Evry-Courcouronnes cedex S.A. au capital de 2 087 910 000 F Tel : +81 3 3592-2766 Tel : +594 33 67 07 www.arianespace.com France RCS Evry B 318 516 457 Fax : +81 3 3592-2768 Fax : +594 33 62 66 User’s Manual Preface This document contains the technical information which is necessary : - to assess compatibility of a spacecraft with the VEGA launches, - to prepare all the technical and operational documentation related to a launch of any spacecraft on VEGA. This document is revised periodically, comments and suggestions on all aspects of this manual will be encouraged and appreciated. Inquiries concerning clarification or interpretation of this manual should be directed to: ARIANESPACE Commercial Directorate / Technical Support Division B.P. 177 - 91006 EVRY Courcouronnes Cedex France Telephone: +33 1 60 87 62 87 Telefax : +33 1 60 87 64 59 Vega User’s manual Foreword Issue 2 FOREWORD The Vega launcher to orbit small payloads in Arianespace Service Vega is being developed within a European Program organised under the aegis of the European Space Agency. The launcher’s prime contractor is ELV S.p.A, a joint company of Fiat Avio and the Italian Space Agency (ASI).
  • Chronology of NASA Expendable Vehicle Missions Since 1990

    Chronology of NASA Expendable Vehicle Missions Since 1990

    Chronology of NASA Expendable Vehicle Missions Since 1990 Launch Launch Date Payload Vehicle Site1 June 1, 1990 ROSAT (Roentgen Satellite) Delta II ETR, 5:48 p.m. EDT An X-ray observatory developed through a cooperative program between Germany, the U.S., and (Delta 195) LC 17A the United Kingdom. Originally proposed by the Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik (MPE) and designed, built and operated in Germany. Launched into Earth orbit on a U.S. Air Force vehicle. Mission ended after almost nine years, on Feb. 12, 1999. July 25, 1990 CRRES (Combined Radiation and Release Effects Satellite) Atlas I ETR, 3:21 p.m. EDT NASA payload. Launched into a geosynchronous transfer orbit for a nominal three-year mission to (AC-69) LC 36B investigate fields, plasmas, and energetic particles inside the Earth's magnetosphere. Due to onboard battery failure, contact with the spacecraft was lost on Oct. 12, 1991. May 14, 1991 NOAA-D (TIROS) (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration-D) Atlas-E WTR, 11:52 a.m. EDT A Television Infrared Observing System (TIROS) satellite. NASA-developed payload; USAF (Atlas 50-E) SLC 4 vehicle. Launched into sun-synchronous polar orbit to allow the satellite to view the Earth's entire surface and cloud cover every 12 hours. Redesignated NOAA-12 once in orbit. June 29, 1991 REX (Radiation Experiment) Scout 216 WTR, 10:00 a.m. EDT USAF payload; NASA vehicle. Launched into 450 nm polar orbit. Designed to study scintillation SLC 5 effects of the Earth's atmosphere on RF transmissions. 114th launch of Scout vehicle.