DOCSLIB.ORG

Foreword Vii Editorial Method and Apparatus Xvii Illustrations Xlvii

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Foreword Vii Editorial Method and Apparatus Xvii Illustrations Xlvii CONTENTS Foreword vii Editorial Method and Apparatus xvii Illustrations xlvii Jefferson Chronology 2 l l k l ' l 1802 To William Bache, 1 July 3 To Charles Bulfinch, 1 July 4 To Mary Jefferson Eppes, 1 July 4 From Albert Gallatin, with Jefferson’s Notes, [1 July] 6 To John Steele, 1 July 7 From John Steele, 1 July 8 From William Tatham, 1 July 8 From Henry Dearborn, 2 July 9 To Mary Jefferson Eppes, 2 July 10 To Albert Gallatin, 2 July 11 From Albert Gallatin, [2 July] 12 From Philip Key, 2 July 12 To Martha Jefferson Randolph, 2 July 13 From Thomas Whitney, 2 July 14 From Thomas Newton, Jr., 3 July 14 To Alexander White, 5 July 15 From John Beckley, 6 July 16 From Carlos IV, King of Spain, 6 July 17 To Peter Carr, 6 July 18 From John Redman Coxe, 6 July 19 From Albert Gallatin, 6 July 20 Memorandum from Albert Gallatin, with Jefferson’s Instructions, 6 July 22 To David Hall, 6 July 24 To Thomas Leiper, 6 July 25 From Levi Lincoln, 6 July 27 Memorandum on Appointments, 6 July 27 From William Bache, 7 July 29 From Albert Gallatin, enclosing Gallatin’s Draft of Authorization for Payment on Maryland Loan, [7 July] 30 From Albert Gallatin, [7 July] 31 <xxxi> CONTENTS To Cyrus Griffin, 7 July 32 From Thomas Jenkins, 7 July 33 From Francis Mentges, 7 July 34 To John F. Mercer, 7 July 35 From James Monroe, 7 July 36 From Henry Dearborn, 8 July 38 From Matthew Adgate, 9 July 39 From Henry Dearborn, 9 July 40 To Albert Gallatin, 9 July 41 To Albert Gallatin, [ca. 9 July] 42 From Samuel Smith, 9 July 42 From James Carroll, with Jefferson’s Note, [on or before 10 July] 43 From Henry R. Graham, 10 July 44 From Dennis Griffith, 10 July 45 From William Kilty and James M. Marshall, with Jefferson’s Note, 10 July 46 From Robert Lawson, 10 July 48 From Louis André Pichon, 10 July 49 From Martha Jefferson Randolph, 10 July 50 From Henry Dearborn, [12 July] 51 To Thomas Newton, 12 July 52 To Albert Gallatin, 13 July 52 To Gibson & Jefferson, 13 July 53 To Rufus King, 13 July 54 From Alexander White, 13 July 57 From Isaac Cox Barnet, 14 July 58 From John Wayles Eppes, 14 July 60 From Cornelius McDermott Roe, [on or before 14 July] 61 To John Ponsonby, 14 July 62 From William G. Stewart, 14 July 62 To Caleb Strong, 14 July 63 To John Trumbull, 14 July 65 To Caspar Wistar, 14 July 65 From Jacob Bouldin, 15 July 66 To John Redman Coxe, 15 July 67 From Cyrus Griffin, 15 July 68 To David Humphreys, 15 July 69 To Joseph Marie Lequinio de Kerblay, 15 July 70 From Joseph Marie Lequinio de Kerblay, 15 July 70 To Francis Mentges, 15 July 71 To James Monroe, 15 July 72 <xxxii> CONTENTS To John Beckley, 16 July 74 To William Duane, enclosing List of Books for the Library of Congress (Paris), List of Books for the Library of Congress (London), and To William Short and George W. Erving, 16 July 75 To Mary Jefferson Eppes, 16 July 80 To George W. Erving, 16 July 81 To Albert Gallatin, 16 July 82 From John Isaac Hawkins, 16 July 83 From John F. Mercer, 16 July 85 To William Short, 16 July 86 From Mary Jefferson Eppes, 17 July 86 From Albert Gallatin, 17 July 87 To Nathaniel Macon, 17 July 89 To James Monroe, 17 July 92 From William Irvine, 18 July 93 From George Logan, 18 July 94 From Benjamin Nones, 18 July 95 From Charles Willson Peale, enclosing Diagram: Skull of an Ox, Diagram: Fossil Skull from Kentucky, and Diagram: Angles of Skulls and Necks, 18 July 95 From Mathew Carey and Others, 19 July 99 From Tench Coxe, 19 July 100 From George Davis, 19 July 101 From H. O. Hebert, 19 July 102 From David Jackson, Jr., 19 July 103 Memorandum to James Madison, 19 July 104 To William Short, 19 July 105 From Samuel Stephens, 19 July 106 To John Barnes, 20 July 107 To Jacob Bouldin, 20 July 107 Statement of Account with Thomas Carpenter, 20 July 107 To James Dinsmore, 20 July 108 To Albert Gallatin, enclosing Authorization for Tench Coxe, 20 July 109 To James Monroe, 20 July 110 To Ellen Wayles Randolph, 20 July 111 From Jonathan Smith, 20 July 111 From Josiah Tattnall, Jr., 20 July 112 From William Wirt, 20 July 114 From George Jefferson, 21 July 114 From J. P. G. Muhlenberg, 21 July 115 <xxxiii> CONTENTS From John Vaughan, 21 July 115 From James Madison, 22 July 116 From Thomas Newton, 22 July 118 From “A Republican,” 23 July 119 From Daniel D’Oyley, 24 July 120 From Albert Gallatin, 24 July 121 From Levi Lincoln, 24 July 123 From Charles Minifie, 24 July 126 From Robert Smith, 24 July 128 From Thomas Underwood, Jr., 25 July 129 From Robert Gourlay, 26 July 130 To John Isaac Hawkins, 26 July 130 To George Jefferson, 26 July 130 From James Monroe, 26 July 131 From “N,” 26 July 132 From Thomas McLean, 27 July 134 To Albert Gallatin, 28 July 135 From Tadeusz Kosciuszko, [on or after 28 July] 135 From Isaac Story, 28 July 136 Chiles Terrell’s Nailery Account, 28 July 136 From William Thornton, 28 July 137 From Henry Dearborn, 29 July 138 To John Barnes, 30 July 140 From John Barnes, 30 July 141 From John Redman Coxe, 30 July 142 From Elijah Griffiths, 30 July 143 To James Madison, 30 July 143 From James Madison, 30 July 144 From Henry Dearborn, 31 July 145 From Henry Dearborn, 31 July 145 From Joseph Marie Lequinio de Kerblay, 31 July 147 From Lucy Ludwell Paradise, 31 July 148 To Daniel Brent, 1 August 150 To Henry Dearborn, 1 August 150 From William Jones, 1 August 151 To Joseph Scott, 1 August 152 From Matthew C. Groves, 2 August 153 From John Barnes, 3 August 154 From Daniel Carroll Brent, 3 August 155 To Albert Gallatin, 3 August 156 From James Lyle, 3 August 158 From John Bird, 4 August 159 <xxxiv> CONTENTS From George Jefferson, 4 August 160 To Henry Dearborn, 5 August 160 To George Jefferson, 5 August 161 To Isaac Story, 5 August 161 To Mawlay Sulayman, Sultan of Morocco, [5 August] 162 To John Barnes, 6 August 164 To Daniel Carroll Brent, 6 August 164 To Henry Dearborn, 6 August 165 From William Henry Harrison, 6 August 165 To James Madison, 6 August 167 From Newburyport, Massachusetts, Citizens, 6 August 168 From Henry Dearborn, 7 August 169 From Albert Gallatin, 7 August 170 From Étienne Lemaire, 7 August 172 From Gideon Granger, 8 August 173 To Thomas Munroe, 8 August 174 To Henry Dearborn, 9 August 175 To Albert Gallatin, 9 August 176 From Albert Gallatin, 9 August 177 From Albert Gallatin, 9 August 178 From Elbridge Gerry, 9 August 180 To James Madison, 9 August 189 From Samuel Morse, 9 August 191 From John Page, 9 August 192 To Robert Smith, 9 August 193 From Samuel Smith, 9 June [i.e. August] 194 To Benjamin Stoddert, 9 August 196 From John Barnes, 10 August 196 From Elias Boudinot, 10 August 197 From Daniel Brent, 10 August 199 From Henry Dearborn, 10 August 199 From William Jarvis, 10 August 200 From Dr. Samuel Kennedy, 10 August 201 From William Lee, 10 August 202 From James Monroe, 10 August 202 From Edmund Custis, 11 August 203 From George Jefferson, 11 August 203 From James Madison, 11 August 204 To William Short, 12 August 205 From Joseph Yznardi, Sr., 12 August 205 To Henry Dearborn, 13 August 208 To Henry Dearborn, 13 August 209 <xxxv> CONTENTS To Albert Gallatin, 13 August 210 To Étienne Lemaire, 13 August 210 To James Madison, 12 [i.e. 13] August 211 From Thomas Munroe, 13 August 211 To Bushrod Washington, 13 August 212 From Luisa and Aurora Bellini, 14 August 213 To John Brown, 14 August 214 To Henry Dearborn, 14 August 216 To Albert Gallatin, 14 August 216 To Albert Gallatin, 14 August 218 To Joseph Marie Lequinio de Kerblay, 14 August 219 From James Madison, 14 August 219 To Josiah Smith, 14 August 221 From Henry Dearborn, 15 August 222 To Daniel D’Oyley, 15 August 224 To Gideon Granger, 15 August 224 From John Barnes, 16 August 225 To Henry Dearborn, 16 August 226 From Pierre Samuel Du Pont de Nemours, 16 August 227 From Albert Gallatin, 16 August 229 To James Madison, 16 August 233 To Thomas Munroe, 16 August 234 To Craven Peyton, 16 August 234 From Robert Smith, 16 August 235 From Augustus B. Woodward, 16 August 237 From Augustus B. Woodward and Others, [ca. 16 August] 237 From William Firby, 17 August 238 From Albert Gallatin, 17 August 241 From Étienne Lemaire, 17 August 244 To James Madison, 17 August 245 From Marblehead, Massachusetts, Inhabitants, 17 August 246 To Robert Smith, 17 August 248 From Robert Smith, 17 August 248 From Adams & Rhoades, 18 August 249 From Andrew Jackson, 18 August 250 From James Madison, 18 August 252 From Isaac Story, 18 August 253 From Tristram Dalton, 19 August 253 From Albert Gallatin, 19 August, enclosing Daniel Clark to Albert Gallatin, 16 August 254 From Albert Gallatin, 19 August 256 <xxxvi> CONTENTS From Bushrod Washington, 19 August 257 From John Barnes, 20 August 257 To Henry Dearborn, 20 August 258 To Albert Gallatin, 20 August 259 From Albert Gallatin, 20 August 261 From David Higginbotham, 20 August 262 From James Madison, 20 August 263 To Robert Smith, 20 August 264 From Robert Smith, 20 August 265 From Isaac Story, 20 August 266 Stay of Execution, 21 August 268 To Mawlay Sulayman, Sultan of Morocco, 21 August 268 From Richard Claiborne, 22 August 271 From Henry Dearborn, 22 August 272 To Robert Smith, 22 August 275 To Albert Gallatin, 23 August 277 From John F.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A History of George Varnum, His Son Samuel Who Came to Ipswich About
    THE VARNUMS OF DRACUTT (IN MASSACHUSETTS) A HISTORY -OF- GEORGE VARNUM, HIS SON SAMUEL WHO CAME TO IPSWICH ABOUT 1635, AND GRANDSONS THOMAS, JOHN AND JOSEPH, WHO SETTLED IN DRACUTT, AND THEIR DESCENDANTS, <.tomptlet> from jfamill] ll)aper.s ant> @ffictal 'Necort>.s, -BY- JOHN MARSHALL VARNUM, OF BOSTON, 19 07. " trr:bosu mbo bo not tnasmn up tbe mimotl!: of tbdt S!nmitats bo not bumbt ta bi nmembtttb bl!: lf)osttrit11:." - EDMUND BURKE, CONTENTS. PAGE PREFACE 5 HISTORY OF THE FAMILY, BY SQUIRE PARKER VARNUM, 5 1818 9 GENEALOGY: GEORGE V ARNUM1 13 SAMUEL V ARNUM2 16 THOMAS V ARNUM3 AND HIS DESCENDANTS 23 JOHN V ARNUM3 AND HIS DESCENDANTS - 43 J°'OSEPH V ARNUM3 AND HIS DESCENDANTS - 115 SKETCH OF GEORGE V ARNAM1 13 WILL OF' GEORGE VARNAM - 14 INVENTORY OF ESTATE OF GEORGE V ARNAM - 15 SKETCH OF SAMUEL V ARNUM1 16 DEED OF SHATSWELL-VARNUM PuROHASE, 1664 17 TRANSFER OF LAND TO V ARNUMS, 1688-1735 21 SKETCH OF THOMAS VARNUM3 28 w ILL OF THOMAS VARNUM - 29 SKETCH OF SAMUEL V ARNUM4 30 INVENTORY OF ESTATE OF THOMAS V ARNUM4 31 SKETCHES OF THOMAS V ARNUM1 34 DEACON JEREMIAH V ARNUM8 35 MAJOR ATKINSON C. V ARNUM7 36 JOHN V ARNUM3 45 INVENTORY OF ESTATE OF JOHN VARNUM 41 iv VARNUM GENEALOGY. SKETCH OF LIEUT. JOHN V ARNUM4 51 JOURNAL OF LIEUT. JOHN VARNUM~ 54-64 vVILL 01' L1EuT. JoHN VARNU111• - 64-66 SKETCHES OF JONAS VARNUM4 67 ABRAHAM V ARNUl\14 68 JAMES VA RNUM4 70 SQUIRE p ARK.ER VARNUM. 74-78 COL, JAMES VARNUM" - 78-82 JONAS VARNUM6 83 CAPT.
    [Show full text]
  • Heads of Families at the First Census 179Q
    HEADS OF FAMILIES AT THE FIRST CENSUS 179Q INTBODUUTION. The information contained in the published report of the First Census of the United States, a small vol- The l?irst Census of the United States (1790) com- ume of 56 pages, was not uniform for the several states prised an enumeration of the inhabitants of the present and territories, For New England and one or two of states of Connecticut, Delaware; Georgia, Kentucky, the other states the population was presented by coun- Maine, Maryland, Massaclmsetts, New Hampshire, ties and towns; that of New Je.rsey appeared partly New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, by counties and towns and partly by counties only; Rhode Island, Soutll Carolina, Tennessee, Vermont, in other cases the returns were given by counties only. and Virginia. Thus the complete transcript of the names of heads of A complete set of.tho schedules for each state, with a families, with accompanying information, presents for summary for the counties, and in many cases for towns, the first time detailed information as to the number was filed in the State Department, but unfortunately of inhabitants-males, females, etc.-for each minor they are not now complete, the returns for the states civil division in all those states for which such infor- of Delaware, Georgia, Kentucky, New Jersey, Tennes- mation was not originally published. see, and Virginia having been destroyed when the In response to repeated requests from patriotic so- British burned the Capitol at Washington during the cieties and persons interested in genealogy, or desir- War of 1812.
    [Show full text]
  • Narrative Section of a Successful Application
    Narrative Section of a Successful Application The attached document contains the grant narrative and selected portions of a previously funded grant application. It is not intended to serve as a model, but to give you a sense of how a successful application may be crafted. Every successful application is different, and each applicant is urged to prepare a proposal that reflects its unique project and aspirations. Prospective applicants should consult the Research Programs application guidelines at http://www.neh.gov/grants/research/scholarly-editions-and-translations-grants for instructions. Applicants are also strongly encouraged to consult with the NEH Division of Research Programs staff well before a grant deadline. Note: The attachment only contains the grant narrative and selected portions, not the entire funded application. In addition, certain portions may have been redacted to protect the privacy interests of an individual and/or to protect confidential commercial and financial information and/or to protect copyrighted materials. Project Title: The Papers of Thomas Jefferson Institution: Princeton University Project Director: Barbara Bowen Oberg Grant Program: Scholarly Editions and Translations 1100 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W., Rm. 318, Washington, D.C. 20506 P 202.606.8200 F 202.606.8204 E [email protected] www.neh.gov Statement of Significance and Impact of Project This project is preparing the authoritative edition of the correspondence and papers of Thomas Jefferson. Publication of the first volume of The Papers of Thomas Jefferson in 1950 kindled renewed interest in the nation’s documentary heritage and set new standards for the organization and presentation of historical documents. Its impact has been felt across the humanities, reaching not just scholars of American history, but undergraduate students, high school teachers, journalists, lawyers, and an interested, inquisitive American public.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Washington's Evolution from Republican Court to Self-Rule, 1801-1831 Merry Ellen Scofield Wayne State University
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Digital Commons@Wayne State University Wayne State University Wayne State University Dissertations 1-1-2014 Assumptions Of Authority: Social Washington's Evolution From Republican Court To Self-Rule, 1801-1831 Merry Ellen Scofield Wayne State University, Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/oa_dissertations Recommended Citation Scofield, Merry Ellen, "Assumptions Of Authority: Social Washington's Evolution From Republican Court To Self-Rule, 1801-1831" (2014). Wayne State University Dissertations. Paper 1055. This Open Access Embargo is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@WayneState. It has been accepted for inclusion in Wayne State University Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@WayneState. ASSUMPTIONS OF AUTHORITY: SOCIAL WASHINGTON'S EVOLUTION FROM REPUBLICAN COURT TO SELF-RULE, 1801-1831 by MERRY ELLEN SCOFIELD DISSERTATION Submitted to the Graduate School of Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY 2014 MAJOR: HISTORY Approved by: ______________________________________ Advisor Date ______________________________________ ______________________________________ ______________________________________ © COPYRIGHT BY MERRY ELLEN SCOFIELD 2014 All Rights Reserved ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Both Oakland University and Wayne State have afforded me the opportunity of working under scholars who have contributed either directly or indirectly to the completion of my dissertation and the degree attached to it. From Oakland, Carl Osthaus and Todd Estes encouraged and supported me and showed generous pride in my small accomplishments. Both continued their support after I left Oakland. There is a direct path between this dissertation and Todd Estes.
    [Show full text]
  • MOUNT AUBURN CEMETERY Page 1 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK NOMINATION NFS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-8 OMB No. 1024-0018 MOUNT AUBURN CEMETERY Page 1 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 1. NAME OF PROPERTY Historic Name: Mount Auburn Cemetery Other Name/Site Number: n/a 2. LOCATION Street & Number: Roughly bounded by Mount Auburn Street, Not for publication:_ Coolidge Avenue, Grove Street, the Sand Banks Cemetery, and Cottage Street City/Town: Watertown and Cambridge Vicinityj_ State: Massachusetts Code: MA County: Middlesex Code: 017 Zip Code: 02472 and 02318 3. CLASSIFICATION Ownership of Property Category of Property Private: X Building(s): _ Public-Local: _ District: X Public-State: _ Site: Public-Federal: Structure: _ Object:_ Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing 4 4 buildings 1 ___ sites 4 structures 15 ___ objects 26 8 Total Number of Contributing Resources Previously Listed in the National Register: 26 Name of Related Multiple Property Listing: n/a NFS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 MOUNT AUBURN CEMETERY Page 2 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 4. STATE/FEDERAL AGENCY CERTIFICATION As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this ___ nomination ___ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]
  • Bunker Hill Reviewed
    From Presidents to Artists to Soldiers to Writers and Politicians, Preserving the Legacy of the First Great Battle of the American Revolution, the Battle of Bunker Hill An Unprecedented Archive of Hundreds of Letters, Many Unpublished, From Men Well Known and Otherwise, on the Creation of America’s First Great Revolutionary War Monument and the Legacy of the Battle that Inspired it Thomas Jefferson, the Battle of Bunker Hill, Lafayette, and Toils of Revolution: “The occasion, which has given birth to it, forms an epoch in the history of mankind, well worthy of the splendid ceremonies with which its first stone was lately laid and consecrated. The coincidence of circumstances too was truly fortunate, which permitted it to be laid by the hand of one so illustrious in his participation of the toils and dangers which followed the event it signalizes.” Daniel Webster: “The advantages of our Revolution are daily felt by every American; and, at the same time, that illustrious event is exciting more and more the admiration of the rest of the world, and an ardent desire to adopt its principles. Yet, glorious and beneficent as its consequences have proved to this nation, not a single monument worthy of being named has hitherto been elevated to testify public gratitude or do honor to national sentiment in the eyes of our own citizens or of strangers.” James Madison on the Battle and the War: “It holds so distinguished a place in our Revolutionary History, itself so distinguished in the annals of Liberty.” The Drummer of Bunker Hill: “I Robert Steele of Dedham in the County of Norfolk… Listed 17 days before Bunker Hill fight in Col Doolittle's Regiment.
    [Show full text]
  • Federalist Politics and William Marbury's Appointment As Justice of the Peace
    Catholic University Law Review Volume 45 Issue 2 Winter 1996 Article 2 1996 Marbury's Travail: Federalist Politics and William Marbury's Appointment as Justice of the Peace. David F. Forte Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.edu/lawreview Recommended Citation David F. Forte, Marbury's Travail: Federalist Politics and William Marbury's Appointment as Justice of the Peace., 45 Cath. U. L. Rev. 349 (1996). Available at: https://scholarship.law.edu/lawreview/vol45/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by CUA Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Catholic University Law Review by an authorized editor of CUA Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARTICLES MARBURY'S TRAVAIL: FEDERALIST POLITICS AND WILLIAM MARBURY'S APPOINTMENT AS JUSTICE OF THE PEACE* David F. Forte** * The author certifies that, to the best of his ability and belief, each citation to unpublished manuscript sources accurately reflects the information or proposition asserted in the text. ** Professor of Law, Cleveland State University. A.B., Harvard University; M.A., Manchester University; Ph.D., University of Toronto; J.D., Columbia University. After four years of research in research libraries throughout the northeast and middle Atlantic states, it is difficult for me to thank the dozens of people who personally took an interest in this work and gave so much of their expertise to its completion. I apologize for the inevita- ble omissions that follow. My thanks to those who reviewed the text and gave me the benefits of their comments and advice: the late George Haskins, Forrest McDonald, Victor Rosenblum, William van Alstyne, Richard Aynes, Ronald Rotunda, James O'Fallon, Deborah Klein, Patricia Mc- Coy, and Steven Gottlieb.
    [Show full text]
  • Few Americans in the 1790S Would Have Predicted That the Subject Of
    AMERICAN NAVAL POLICY IN AN AGE OF ATLANTIC WARFARE: A CONSENSUS BROKEN AND REFORGED, 1783-1816 Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Jeffrey J. Seiken, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2007 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor John Guilmartin, Jr., Advisor Professor Margaret Newell _______________________ Professor Mark Grimsley Advisor History Graduate Program ABSTRACT In the 1780s, there was broad agreement among American revolutionaries like Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, and Alexander Hamilton about the need for a strong national navy. This consensus, however, collapsed as a result of the partisan strife of the 1790s. The Federalist Party embraced the strategic rationale laid out by naval boosters in the previous decade, namely that only a powerful, seagoing battle fleet offered a viable means of defending the nation's vulnerable ports and harbors. Federalists also believed a navy was necessary to protect America's burgeoning trade with overseas markets. Republicans did not dispute the desirability of the Federalist goals, but they disagreed sharply with their political opponents about the wisdom of depending on a navy to achieve these ends. In place of a navy, the Republicans with Jefferson and Madison at the lead championed an altogether different prescription for national security and commercial growth: economic coercion. The Federalists won most of the legislative confrontations of the 1790s. But their very success contributed to the party's decisive defeat in the election of 1800 and the abandonment of their plans to create a strong blue water navy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Varnums of Dracutt (In Massachusetts) a History of George
    NYPL RESEARCH LIBRARIES 3 3433 08043941 1 ATI/ V^RNUM ' THE VARNUMS OF DRACUTT (in MASSACHUSETTS) A HISTORY OF George Varnum, his son Samuel who came to Ipswich ABOUT 1635, AND GRANDSONS ThOMAS, JoHN AND Joseph, who settled in Dracutt, AND their descendants. (romptlc5 from ffamtlp papers an5 ©tficial "Kccor&s BY JOHN MARSHALL VARNUM, OF BOSTON. BOSTON : DAVID CLAPP & SON, PRINTERS. 1907. n t5 < « ^*yo to not "STJjoae tnljo tio not treaaurc up tijt tncmorg of tjjti'r anttators " — lieset&e to be remcmbnttf bg Posterttg. edmund burke. CONTENTS. PAGE Preface ------..._ 5 History of the Family, by Squire Parker Varnum,' 1.S18 9 Genealogy : George Varnl^m' ---.._. 13 Samxjel Varnum- ----__. k^ Thomas Varnum' and his Descendants - - . 23 John Varnum' and ms Descendants - - - - 43 Joseph Varnum' and his Descendants - - - 115 Sketch of George Varnam' ---.__ 13 Will of George Varnam ------ 14 Inventory of Estate of George Varnam - - - 15 Sketch of Samuel Varnum' ---.._ ig Deed of Shatsavell-Varnum Purchase, 1664 - - 17 of Lan-d to - - Transfer Varnums, 1688-1735 . 21 Sketch of Thomas Varntjm' ------ 28 Will of Thomas Varnum ------ 29 Sketch of Samuel Varnusi* ------ 30 Inventory of Estate of Thomas Varnum' - - - 31 Sketches of Thomas Varnum* --.-.., 34 - - - - Deacon Jerejhah Varnum' . 35 - - - Major Atkinson C. Varnum' . - 35 John Varnum' ------__ 45 Inventory of Estate of John Varnum - - - 47 IV VAENTTTM GENEALOGY. Sketch of Lieut. John Vaenum* - - - - - 51 Journal of Lieut. John Varntjm* . _ _ _ 54-64 Will of Lieut. John Varnum' ----- 64-66 Sketches of Jonas Varnum* -.----_. 67 Abraham Varnum* .--..-- 68 James Varnum* __--... 70 Squire Parker Varnum' -__--.
    [Show full text]
  • Chess and the American Presidency
    CHESS AND THE AMERICAN PRESIDENCY GEORGE WASHINGTON JOHN ADAMS First President of the United States (No Party) Second President of the United States (Federalist) In Office April 30, 1789 – March 4, 1797 In Office March 4, 1797 – March 4, 1801 It is not known if he played chess. Known chess player. Adams was sent by Congress to France Chess is credited with helping George twice to represent the United States— Washington to win a crucial battle first in 1777 and again in 1779. On in the Revolutionary War. On the his second trip, Adams was appointed night of December 25–26, 1776, Minister Plenipotentiary (a Minister/ General Washington crossed the Envoy of the United States) and was Delaware River with his troops on charged with the mission of negotiating the way to Trenton, New Jersey. The a treaty of amity and commerce with Hessian regiments, camped in and Britain. Adams had many problems around Trenton, were attacked and with his missions, the first being the decisively defeated by the American disapproval of the appointment by the Continental Army. The Hessians had French government and the second supposedly let their guard down to his relationship with U.S. Chess Hall celebrate the Christmas holiday, and (b. 1732 – d. 1799) of Fame inductee Benjamin Franklin (b. 1735 – d. 1826) British commander, Colonel Johann (1706-1790) on his excursions. In his Gottlieb Rall (also spelled Rahl) (c. diary of May 27, 1778, Adams wrote of his frustration and described a routine 1726-1776) himself was misled by John Honeyman, a spy of Washington who “working” day with Benjamin Franklin—a known chess enthusiast, player, and convincingly posed as a loyalist.
    [Show full text]
  • The Architecture of Slavery: Art, Language, and Society in Early Virginia
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1991 The architecture of slavery: Art, language, and society in early Virginia Alexander Ormond Boulton College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the African History Commons, Architecture Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Boulton, Alexander Ormond, "The architecture of slavery: Art, language, and society in early Virginia" (1991). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539623813. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-3sgp-s483 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. Hie quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
    [Show full text]
  • Dearborn, Henry
    The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project HENRY DEARBORN Interviewed by: Charles Stuart Kennedy Initial interview date: April 24, 1991 Copyright 2009 A ST TABLE OF CONTENTS Background Born and raised in assachusetts Dartmouth College and Yale Law School Foreign Policy Association Entered the Foreign Service in 1941 Barran)uilla, Columbia, -ice Consul 1941.1942 utiny Environment 0erman influence anta, Ecuador, Principal Officer 1942.19449 Opening Consulate Blacklisted firms Environment Operations 1ndustry Living conditions 0uaya)uil, Ecuador2 Consular Officer 3blacklist firms4 1944 Revolution State Department2 Ecuador Desk Officer 1944.1947 Seymour 1sland Base Rights Spruille Braden Braden7 essersmith feud State Department, Argentine Desk Officer 1947.1982 State Department, Director, Office of South American Affairs 1982.1988 Argentina Castro 1 FB1 interest in Latin America Legal Attach9s Peron Rio Treaty cCarthy Argentina:s nuclear energy project Nazis in Argentina Lima, Peru2 Head of Political Section 1988.1988 Peru.Ecuador relations Family Politics Attempted coup Elections US Ambassadors US interests Peru.Ecuador boundary dispute National War College 1988.1989 Santa Domingo, Dominican Republic 1989.1961 Deputy Chief of ission Ambassador Aoseph Farland Situation under Trujillo Catholic Church:s role Deteriorating US relations Support for Trujillo in US US and opposition forces Break in relations Acting as C1A station chief Assassination of Trujillo Emergency departure President Balguer Ramfis Trujillo Trujillo:s attempt to frighten US Trujillo:s torture methods President Bennedy:s secret 3Robert urphy4 to Trujillo Bennedy interest in DR regimes Relations with C1A 1989.1961 Charg9 d:affaires C1A re)uests Dearborn to be link to DR opposition 1n touch with pro.US dissidents C1A chief arrives Aan.
    [Show full text]