Prepared For: Prepared
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Prepared For: City of Columbus, Division of Mobility Options Prepared By: Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Interim Final Plan September 2011 A note to the reader This Interim Final Plan was produced to allow for approval and implementa- tion of individual recommendations of the Weinland Park Community Mobil- ity Plan. While some of the Plan’s recommendations can be implemented as soon as resources are allocated, other recommendations will require additional study to determine feasibility – specifically improvements recommended for N Fourth Street, Summit Street, and E Fifth Avenue. The City of Columbus is committed to providing facilities for pedestrians, cy- clists, and other modal users. City staff members are working toward develop- ing solutions that accommodate these users while providing acceptable levels of service to current and future automobile drivers, and satisfying ODOT’s geometric design standards. A forthcoming final version of the Weinland Park Community Mobility Plan will include the results of feasibility studies, pro- viding final recommendations for these corridors. Acknowledgements Mayor University Area Commission Michael B. Coleman Ian MacConnell Ron Hupman Susan Keeny Sara Matthiesen Columbus City Council David Hegley John Risteter Michael C. Mentel Seth Golding Charles Robol Hearcel F. Craig Ian Studders Joaquin Serantes Andrew J. Ginther Sharon Young Laura Shinn A. Troy Miller Miles Curtiss Dick Talbot Eileen Y. Paley Pasquale Grado Doreen Uhas Saurer Charleta B. Tavares Bill Graver Rimar Villasenor Priscilla R. Tyson Joyce Hughes Tom Wildman Department of Public Service Mobility Plan Steering Committee Mark Kelsey, Director Laura Bidwa Carl Shoolman John Gideon Steve Simmons Division of Mobility Options Joyce Hughes Jeff Stephens Randall J. Bowman, Administrator Rory Krupp Pablo Tanguay William A. Lewis, Chief Mobility Engineer Chris Orban Mark Wagenbrenner Nicholas J. Popa, Bikeways and Community Julia Orban Mobility Manager Terry L. Stewart, Project Engineer The project team would like to thank the residents Jodi M. Stefanik, EIT of Weinland Park for their participation, persis- tence, and patience throughout the development of Project Team this plan. Special thanks are extended to the Wein- Stantec Consulting Services Inc. land Park Community Civic Association and its HKI Associates, Inc. officers, particularly Joyce Hughes, President and Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Commission Chris Orban, Traffic and Mobility Committe Chair University Area Enrichment Association for their leadership during the planning process. Walkable Communities, Inc. Acknowledgements i Executive Summary iii Introduction 1 Mobility Planning 2 The Community Mobility Planning Process 3 Mobility Planning in Weinland Park 3 Issues and Concerns 9 3-1-1 Service Requests 10 Communication Forums & Input Opportunities 12 Public Involvement Comments 16 Existing Conditions 19 Guiding Plans and Studies 20 Automobiles 24 Pedestrians 35 Bicycles 44 Transit 45 Recommended Solutions 47 Toolbox of Treatments 48 Automobile Tools 48 Pedestrian Tools 53 Bicycle Tools 57 Transit Tools 59 Other Tools 61 Location Based Recommendations 63 Neighborhood Improvements 63 Corridor Improvements 65 Site Specific Improvements 71 Prioritization and Implementation 83 Plan Prioritization 84 Implementation Strategy 86 Table of Contents Table Updating the Plan 90 ii Located just north of downtown Columbus and south of The Ohio State University, Weinland Park is a densely populated community consisting primarily of single and multi-family residences. With a strong grid style street network and traversed by several north-south and east-west arterial streets, Weinland Park is well connected to the surrounding city and central Ohio region. This connectivity presents both opportunities and challenges for mobility within and through the neighborhood. Historically, the need for vehicular traffic to access downtown from outlying areas of the city has been prioritized over other modes and the travel needs of local residents in Weinland Park. The result is that several streets, Summit and Fourth in particular, have become barriers to mobility, hindering multi-modal connectivity and segmenting the community. Prompted by resident concerns (expressed through 311 requests) as well as other issues such as high incidences of pedestrian crashes and traffic violations, the City initiated the Weinland Park Community Mobility Plan (WPCMP) to improve mobility conditions throughout the the neighborhood. The recommendations included in the WPCMP will work to achieve the following goals: • Balance the transportation system for moving people and goods by all modes (pedestrian, bicycle, automobile, transit, truck, and rail) • Reduce traffic violations (speeding, failure to yield to pedestrians, running red-lights, etc) • Recognize and strengthen the connection between land use and mobility (coordination with other planning efforts) • Promote distinct and vibrant neighborhoods • Address issues identified by community residents • Recommend comprehensive yet implementable solutions Through a combination of extensive community input and technical data collection, the project team first worked to identify the existing conditions and most significant barriers to mobility in the neighborhood. The public input opportunities included several community open house and workshop meetings, neighborhood walk audits, resident surveys, meetings with stakeholder groups, and informal porch chats. These efforts resulted in the compilation of approximately 1,000 comments regarding mobility conditions in Weinland Park. The most frequent concerns expressed by the public were for pedestrian safety when crossing High, Summit, Summary Executive and Fourth streets; issues with driving in Weinland Park (most of these related to conversion of Summit and Fourth streets from one to two-way operation); and concerns over driver behavior (predominantly speeding). These three categories accounted for over 50% of all comments recevied. Resident concerns were confirmed by traffic studies which identified excess vehicular capacity and speeding problems along iii Recommended Short-Term Projects (0-3 Years) Summit and Fourth Streets. Additionally, several offset intersections along these corridors Project Recommended create poor sight distance for turning vehicles and crossing pedestrians. These factors all result Location # Improvement in high occurrences of pedestrian and vehicular crashes in several locations. Comments related 2 Bicycle Parking Various Locations to bicycle safety and lack of facilities, crime and personal safety, and sidewalk issues each Sixth Ave - Indianola Ave accounted for 8%, while the remaining 25% of comments were scattered throughout a variety 7 Sidewalk Installation to Summit St & Fifth St to of other mobility issues. Sixth St Shared Signed High St - Fifth Ave to 9 The next step in the community mobility planning process was the development of a “Toolbox Roadway Twelfth Ave of Treatments,” which consists of numerous mobility improvements that were selected Improved Signal Summit St & Fourth St - 11 Timing Warren St to Hudson St to address the array of issues and concerns expressed through public input and observed Restripe Lanes & during data collection. The Toolbox is intened to serve as an ongoing resource for use by the Summit St & Fourth St - 12 Remove Parking City and residents of Weinland Park to diagnose and address future mobility issues in the Warren St to Hudson St Restrictions neighborhood. Summit St at south 16 HAWK Beacon* park path Drawing on the Toolbox of Treatments, a list of 54 location based recommendations was Fourth St at south park 17 HAWK Beacon* path develoved to address the existing issues throughout Weinland Park. For each location, a tool, Intersection Safety or combination of tools, was selected and applied to address the identified mobility problem. 18 Seventh Ave & Summit St Improvements** Some recommended improvements apply to the entire neighborhood, some to a roadway Crosswalk with corridor, and others to specific sites or intersections. 19 Eighth Ave & Summit St Rapid Flash Beacon Crosswalk with 20 Eighth Ave & Fourth St Once the list of recommended projects was developed, members of the public and the WPCMP Rapid Flash Beacon Steering Committee worked with the project team to prioritize the projects. Based on this Curb Extensions Seventh Ave east of 23 with Lane Shift High St prioritization along with factors such as location, effectiveness at achieving the plan goals, Seventh Ave & Courtland estimated cost, and funding source, an implementation strategy was developed that groups 27 Curb Extension Ave the projects into short-term (0-3 years), medium-term (4-7 years), and long-term (7+ years) 31 Curb Extensions Indianola Ave & Fifth Ave recommendations and identifies a responsible party for each. Indianola Ave & Seventh 32 Curb Extensions Ave This strategy will help to ensure that the WPCMP is implemented in a way that consistently 33 Curb Extensions Indianola Ave & Euclid Ave improves mobility conditions throughout the neighborhood over the coming years. However, Curb Extensions 34 Indianola Ave & Ninth Ave given the changing nature of funding and community priorities, this plan should be re-evaluted with Raised Median and updated every five years to reflect completed projects, adapt to new issues, and ensure that 47 Mini Circle Indianola Ave & Sixth Ave it continues to address the mobility needs of Weinland Park and its residents. 48 Mini Circle Indianola Ave