Annual Report 2018-2019
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Frequently Asked Questions & Answers Reopening East West
Frequently Asked Questions & Answers Reopening East West Runway Q: How many runways does Sydney Airport have? A: Sydney Airport has three runways: • East-west runway, also known as runway 07/25 • Main north-south runway, also known as runway 16R/34L • Parallel north-south runway, also known as runway 16L/34R Q: When are the three runways typically used? A: The Australian Government agency responsible for air traffic control – Airservices Australia – manages runway usage to ensure safety. Weather – especially wind direction and strength and rain – is a major factor in deciding which runways can be safely used for take-off and landing. Aircraft generally take-off and land into the wind, or with minimal tail wind. Based on wind direction, air traffic control will decide which runway is used at any given time. However, the decision to take-off or land ultimately rests with the pilot-in-command of the aircraft. Q: What is “noise sharing” and how is it implemented? A: At Sydney Airport, the Australian Government’s noise sharing policy – known as the Long Term Operating Plan, or LTOP – also influences when a particular runway is used. The LTOP is a program to manage aircraft noise from Sydney Airport. It aims to make sure flights are sent over water and non-residential land, as much as possible. Where this is not possible, it aims to share noise across communities in Sydney and provide periods of respite from noise. It provides ten different ways of using the airport’s three runways and associated flight paths, some of which involve use of the east-west runway. -
Annual Report 2015 - 2016
St George Family Support Services Inc. ANNUAL REPORT 2015 - 2016 CONTENTS Acknowledgements ............................................................................... 2 Vision, Mission, Values & History ......................................................... 3 Principles ................................................................................................ 4 Organisational Structure ...................................................................... 5 Our Management Committee ............................................................. 6 Agenda .................................................................................................... 7 Minutes from 2014-2015 AGM ............................................................. 8 President’s Report ................................................................................. 10 Treasurer’s Report ................................................................................ 11 Manager’s Report .................................................................................. 12 Group Reports ....................................................................................... 15 Client Stories ......................................................................................... 17 Financial Report ..................................................................................... 20 Page 1 St George Family Support Services Inc. Annual Report 2015 - 2016 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We are grateful to the NSW Department of Family & Community Services for providing -
Constructing Time and Space in the Garden Suburb
1 Constructing Time and Space in the Garden Suburb lon Hoskins Allan Ashbolt began his contribution to Me anj in' s 1,9 6 6' G o dzone' symposium with a portrayal of Australian 'reality': Behold the man-the Australian of today-on Sunday morn- ings in the suburbs, when the high decibel drone of the motor- mower is calling the faithful to worship. A block of land, a brick veneer, and the motor-mower beside him in the wilder- ness-what more does he want to sustain him. In Ashbolt's suburbia we have wilderness and garden, the pioneer and his Victa, linked-albeit ironically-to material and spiritual sustenance. The mowers proceed to drown out 'the plaintive clanging of the church-bells . [and] swell into a mechanised pagan chorus'.l They become both literally and symbolically the intrusive machines in the Edenic garden of Ausrralian radicalism, which Ashbolt maintains 'went up a cul-de-sac in the first decade of this century'. The growth and shaping of suburbia, rhen, becomes indicative of the hardening 'pattern of conformity', while the Victa-that symbol of 'personal property . demo- cratic rights . [and] power'-has subdued rhe pre-war ideal of 1 B¡nsrs or Su¡un¡n (orsrnucltc I llmr lto Srlc¡ rn rx¡ Glnor¡ Su¡un¡ 'Australian radicalism, mixed as itwas with the inchoate spirit of connected to a program of reform which is sophisticated nationalism'.2 but fundamentally conservative of capitalist social relations.5 For Allan Ashbolt, the developmenr of suburbia after'$íorld ,logic, IØar Il.represented the loss of something identifiably Austral- A key factor here is rhe element of which .rrrd"ríi'e, "rry ian-th'e healthy radicalism linked to the left-wing nationalism of metonymic and metaphoric relation between word and subject. -
Submission to Independent Review
13095 3 February 2014 Marian Pate Sutherland LEP Review NSW Department of Planning and Infrastructure PO Box 39 SYDNEY NSW 2001 Dear Ms Pate SUTHERLAND LEP INDEPENDENT REVIEW 32-40 CAWARRA ROAD, CARINGBAH Thank you for the opportunity to make a submission on the Sutherland LEP Independent Review. This submission is made on behalf of Costco Wholesale (Australia) Pty Ltd ( Costco ) in relation to part of 32-40 Cawarra Road, Caringbah (the Site ). Costco does not own the Site but is in negotiations with the landowner, Leda Holdings, to develop it. Costco made a submission on the original exhibited version of the draft Sutherland Local Environmental Plan 2013 (Draft LEP ). Costco subsequently provided additional justification at the request of Council officers. Both of these documents are attached . Costco’s submission requested that a Costco warehouse (categorised as a ‘shop’ in the Standard Instrument) be made permissible on the Site under Schedule 1 (Additional Permitted Uses) of the Draft LEP. The submission was detailed, well-reasoned and supported by a Concept Plan, a Preliminary Market Analysis and Traffic Analysis. Key points raised in the submission included: ° Demonstrated market demand for a Costco warehouse in the Sutherland Shire; ° Economic benefits for the Sutherland Shire, including significant employment opportunities; ° Consistency with the strategic planning framework and vision, including the Sutherland Employment Strategy; ° Consistency with Section 117 Directions; ° Consistency with the B7 Business Park objectives; and ° Suitability of the site for a Costco warehouse due to its size, location within an employment area and proximity to transport corridors and bulky goods retailers. The Draft LEP was then amended, and development for the purpose of a ‘shop’ was made permissible with consent under the second exhibited version. -
Development Control Plan 2011
developmentrockdale control plan 2011 Amendment Schedule Prepared and published by Rockdale City Council’s Urban Strategy Team Adopted: 4 May 2011 Effective: 5 December 2011 Amended as per table below Amendment Date of Date of Effect Description Number Adoption 2 5/6/2013 20/6/2013 Part 7.4 Ramsgate Beach Commercial Area - Controls pertaining to Ramsgate Beach commercial area 1 6/2/2013 13/12/2013 Part 4.3 Landscape Planning and Design Part 5.1 Low and Medium Density Residential Controls for Attached Dwellings and Semi-detached Dwellings 3 15/10/2014 05/06/2015 Part 7.5 Rockdale Town Centre Rockdale DCP 2011 Rockdale DCP ii Contents 1 PRELIMINARY 1│1 2 URBAN STRATEGY 2│1 3 SITE ANALYSIS 3│1 4 GENERAL PRINCIPLES FOR DEVELOPMENT 4│1 4.1 SITE PLANNING 4│3 4.1.1 Views and Vistas 4│4 4.1.2 Heritage ConserVation 4│7 Requirement for Heritage Reports Development of Heritage Items Development in the Vicinity of Heritage Items 4.1.3 water ManageMent 4│11 Stormwater Management Flood Risk Management Water Conservation Water Quality Groundwater Protection 4.1.4 soil ManageMent 4│14 4.1.5 ContaMinated land 4│15 4.1.6 deVelopMent on sloping sites 4│16 4.1.7 tree preserVation 4│17 4.1.8 BiodiVersity 4│19 4.1.9 lot size and site Consolidation 4│20 Lot Size and Minimum Site Frontage Avoidance of Isolated Sites 4.2 STREETSCAPE AND SITE CONTEXT 4│23 Site Context Streetscape Character Pedestrian Environment Fencing Sandstone Walling, Rock Outcrops and Kerbing Rockdale DCP 2011 Rockdale DCP iii Contents 4.3 LANDSCAPE PLANNING AND DESIGN 4│29 4.3.1 open spaCe -
22 February, 2021 Submission to Transport NSW on the Heathcote
22 February, 2021 Submission to Transport NSW on the Heathcote Bridge Widening Project Sutherland Shire Environment Centre is an independent, not-for-profit, non-government, community organisation that has been actively involved in advocating for the environment since 1991. We welcome the Heathcote bridge widening and upgrade as an important road safety initiative – the fatalities there demonstrate the upgrade is long overdue. We have been researching the issue of wildlife crossings around major road crossings in the Sutherland Shire and bioregions for some time now, and have carried out extended research, consulting with a number of other environmental and community organisations around the region in order to determine the issues that need to be addressed. This submission has been prepared in consultation with and is co-signed by: - National Parks Association Southern Sydney - Rewilding Sydney’s Koalas - Woronora Valley Residents Association - Sandy Point Residents Association - Friends of the Royal - Oatley Flora and Fauna Conservation Society - Georges River Environmental Alliance Our joint submission focuses largely on one aspect of the upgrade – the wildlife crossings in the proposed design brief. It is based on the assumption the selected design will be for the Transport NSW preferred option, widening the bridge using the headstock technique. Beyond our focus on wildlife crossings one key additional point of concern is that we share Sutherland Shire Council’s reservations regarding “the huge potential for irreversible harm to be done to the aquatic habitats of the Woronora River”,1 and we request further information on this matter. We anticipate Transport NSW will address this and institute careful monitoring systems. -
Community Strategic Plan 2018-2028
COMMUNITY STRATEGIC PLAN 2018-2028 www.georgesriver.nsw.gov.au 2 Georges River Council // Community Strategic Plan 2018-2028 IN RECOGNITION OF THE BIDDEGAL PEOPLE Georges River Council acknowledges that the Biddegal people of the Eora Nation are the traditional inhabitants and custodians of all land and water in which the Georges River region is situated. Council recognises Aboriginal people as an integral part of the Georges River community and highly values their social and cultural contributions. Georges River Council is committed to show respect for Aboriginal people as Australia's First Peoples. Council has adopted the practice of acknowledging the Traditional Custodians of Country at events, ceremonies, meetings and functions. 3 Mayor’s Foreword ........................................................................6 CONTENTS Community Vision statement .......................................................8 About this draft Community Strategic Plan ..................................10 Creating a Plan with the community ............................................10 Six pillars to shape our planning..................................................11 Our planning framework ..............................................................12 Our role in a growing metropolis..................................................12 About the Georges River area .....................................................14 Wards and councillors .................................................................16 Pillar 1: A protected environment and -
South Eastern Sydney Local Priorities
Targeted Earlier Intervention Program Sydney, South Eastern Sydney and Northern Sydney South Eastern Sydney District Local Priorities We will take a local approach We know that every local community is different and has distinct needs and priorities. Local knowledge is crucial to identifying and addressing these needs. That’s why we’re taking a local approach to recommissioning for Targeted Earlier Intervention (TEI). The new TEI program will focus on collecting data so you can learn more about your local community. This will help you to identify needs, as they change, in your area. As the evidence grows, you’ll be able to adapt your service to what works in your community. This is crucial to supporting children, young people, families and communities experiencing, or at risk of experiencing, vulnerability in NSW. Department of Communities and Justice (DCJ) Districts will work with you to identify the needs and priorities of your community. We will look at: local priority groups – who needs the services most in your community? location – where in your local area are the services needed most? service type – what kinds of services will work in your area? This evidence-based snapshot outlines the main priority groups in your District. This will help you to plan services that can make a real difference in your local area. Local Priorities for South Eastern Sydney District In no particular order 1. Children, young people and families or carers affected by mental ill-health, substance misuse, separation, or domestic and family violence 2. Children, young people and families with multiple risk factors 3. -
Cook Cove INDICATIVE DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL Kogarah Golf Course Relocation
Cook Cove INDICATIVE DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL Kogarah Golf Course Relocation APRIL 2016 • VERSION 1.0 3.0 THE INDICATIVE DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL 3.0 The Indicative Development Proposal 3.1 Overview The substantive components of the Cook Cove Indicative Development Proposal are as follows: • The new Kogarah Golf Course; • Cook Cove sports and recreation precinct; • Public domain works and shared cycle ways; • Precinct environmental works; • Mixed use development precinct; • Arncliffe market gardens upgrade; and • Rockdale Bicentennial and Scarborough Park upgrades. Each component is described in more detail in the following sections and within Figure 3 over the page. APRIL 2016 • VERSION 1.0 17 Figure 3: Indicative Development Proposal Plan 18 COOK COVE – INDICATIVE DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL 3.2 The new Kogarah Golf Course The Kogarah Golf Club (KGC) has been a member of the St George community since 1928. The Club intends to actively promote and communicate the accessibility of the proposed new Club facilities to the wider Rockdale community, both existing and future (i.e. Arncliffe, Banksia and Cook Cove), to attract the widest possible support for the future operations of the Club. It is proposed to construct a new 18-hole golf course, practice and clubhouse facilities entirely within the southern precinct of Cook Cove (south of the M5 Motorway), bordered to the east by the Cooks River, foreshore cycle link and Muddy Creek, to the west by Eve Street, Firmstone Gardens, the Arncliffe Market Gardens and West Botany Street and to the south by Bestic -
Robin Nicolle My Essay on the Beautiful Botany
Name: Robin Nicolle My Essay on the Beautiful Botany Bay 2018 Ron Rathbone Local History Competition Introduction 1 There are many beautiful places around the world but there is only one Bayside Council and you can only find it here in Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. The Bayside encompasses various suburbs including Arncliffe, Wolli Creek and Rockdale to name a few. It is an area rich not only in history, that dates back to 1770 when the first settlers arrived but also in architecture, culture and a big variety of people from all corners of the globe. Since people first settled in the Bayside Council, most of the development and infrastructure has been slow however the decisions made by a lot of influential people over the last 200 years have helped to shape it into the thriving community that we know today. In short the Bayside Council continues to grow every year and we want it to be well established as one of the best places in the world to live. For my essay I decided to focus on two of the most important elements of the Bayside Council, the History and the Architecture Architecture ANSI POPO Cr CIP,O. 5' 00, -PrJ al SO" BUILDING ELEVATION History of Botany Bay and Surrounding Suburbs 2 British Settlement The history of Botany Bay dates as far back as Sunday 29th April 1770. That is the day a British Sailor first landed in Kurnell on the banks of Botany Bay. He sailed all the way to Australia on his magnificent ship called the HMS Endeavour. -
Road Opening Application
Road Opening Application Note: this form is only for properties in: Arncliffe; Banksia; Bardwell Park; Bardwell Valley; Bexley; Bexley North; Brighton Le Sands; Carlton; Dolls Point; Kingsgrove; Kogarah; Kyeemagh; Monterey; Ramsgate; Ramsgate Beach; Rockdale; Sandringham; Sans Souci, Turrella and Wolli Creek. Lodgement fee – Work Activities on Road Reserve including Roads, $136 (GST Exempt) Plus Office Use Footpaths and Nature strips applicable Restoration Fees AP/ROP Applicant Details Ms/Mr/Mrs/Other (please state) Family Name Given Name No. Street Suburb Postcode Mailing Address (if different) Tel (Home/Work/Mobile) Fax (home/work) Email Contractor Details Plumber Drainer Builder Other (please specify) Name of Contractor Licence Number Name of Company (if applicable) Address Suburb Tel (Work/Mobile) Fax (Home/Work) Description of Road Reserve to be Opened Road Footpath Kerb & Gutter Nature Strip Other (please specify) Address Suburb Reason Sewer Stormwater Water Other The opening is fronting ___________________________________Street/Road __________________Suburb Proposed date for opening _____ / _____ / _____ Proposed opening size __________ m² Office use only Receipt No Date $ Privacy Statement The personal information provided on this form (including your name and other details) will be handled in accordance with the Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 and may be available to the public under various legislation. Refer also to the Privacy Statement on Council’s website Eastgardens Customer Service Rockdale -
To Remove Or Prune a Tree on Private
TO REMOVE OR PRUNE A TREE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY This form is for the following suburbs only: Banksmeadow, Botany, Daceyville, Eastgardens, Eastlakes, Hillsdale, Mascot, Pagewood and Rosebery. Enquiries: 1300 581 299 www.bayside.nsw.gov.au ABOUT THIS FORM Use this form to seek permission to remove or prune a tree or other vegetation that is subject to approval requirements. Apart from exempt species, Council assessment is required for vegetation that has grown to 3 or more metres high or has a girth of 600mm or more when measured 1 metre from the ground. If your proposal is related to a Development Application awaiting determination you do not need to lodge a separate Application to Remove or Prune a Tree on Private Property. An application may only be lodged by the private property owner or their authorised agent and the relevant application fee paid. A separate application is required for each separate property. However, details of more than one tree or shrub can be included on an application for the same property. Proposals are assessed against the Bayside Development Control Plan 2013 (Part 3F Tree Management) and property specific development conditions that may apply to the site. This form is not to be used for customer requests about vegetation in public spaces such as streets and parks. The personal details requested on this form are being collected, and will only be used for, the purposes related to this application/payment. The supply of information by you is voluntary. If you do not provide the information sought, then Council will not be able to process your application/payment.