Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province Basic Income Research Group(BIRG) December 2019
POLICY BRIEF
Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province Basic Income Research Group(BIRG) December 2019
Gyeonggi Research Institute
POLICY BRIEF
Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province Basic Income Research Group(BIRG) December 2019
Gyeonggi Research Institute
Gyeonggi Research Institute
Preface
Gyeonggi Province has implemented the Gyeonggi Province’s project on payment of Youth Basic Income since April 2019 and after the payment for the 1st quarter had ended, a satisfaction survey for the 1st quarter has been conducted. As the result of the satisfaction survey at the time of first payment of Gyeonggi Province Youth Basic Income was reasonable, it was assumed that it would not be difficult to forejudge the results when the number of payment accumulates in the future. The result after the payment for the 3rd quarter surely demonstrates that the said prediction was correct.
Gyeonggi Research Institute conducted a satisfaction survey on youths who have received and used the Youth Basic Income after the payment of KRW 250,000 had been paid out for the 3rd quarter as Gyeonggi Province Youth Basic Income in September. They are applicable in case they have applied for 2nd quarter and 3rd quarter as well out of the 124,335 applicants who have applied for the 1st quarter of Youth Basic Income. Among them, 3,500 people were sampled and over the survey period from November 4th to 15th, web questionnaire was conducted through survey specialist institute, Research Rim Co., Ltd. It’s survey questions and details were equivalent to those of the 1st quarter, and the subjects were selected based on random sampling method.
According to the survey result, in case of youth aged 24 who are receiving the youth basic income in Gyeonggi Province, the general level of satisfaction regarding this project was
5 Gyeonggi Research Institute
77.22 points of 100 points (82.7% satisfied, 14.0% average, 3.3% dissatisfied). This is a +0.12 point increase (+2.1%p satisfied, –0.5%p normal, –1.6%p dissatisfied) compared to the survey result of the 1st quarter. Although the difference in satisfaction between the 1st quarter and 3rd quarter isn’t significantly big, the fact that it is increasing can be considered to be very positive. In particular, the result is an increase from the satisfaction response state of above 80% in the 1st quarter and as this is not easy to achieve, it is an inspiring result.
In detail, there were items that had a mixture of increase and decrease. This is an extremely natural phenomenon and this goes to show that the satisfaction survey for the 3rd quarter has been conducted well in accordance with the specified survey principles.
If Gyeonggi Province responds with more sophisticated policy decisions by summarizing and determining the positive details as well as improvements identified through this satisfaction survey report and comparison with the result of the 1st quarter, the youth basic income policy in Gyeonggi Province would improve further and would be able to stand as a basic income project that would become a role model internationally.
I would like to express my gratitude to Dr. Young Seong Yoo, Head of Basic Income Research Group who has endeavored to prepare this satisfaction survey report, along with Wonho Jeong, senior research fellow, Byeongjo Kim, research fellow, Jooyoung Ma, researcher as well as the officials at the survey institute, Research RIM Co., Ltd.
December, 2019 President of Gyeonggi Research Institute
Hanjoo Lee
6 Gyeonggi Research Institute
Research Summary
Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
This survey was carried out on youths who have received and used local currency 3 times in total (1st quarter, 2nd quarter, and 3rd quarter) out of the applicants who have applied for the 1st quarter of youth basic income in Gyeonggi Province (124,335 people) for the purpose of achieving better policy effects and collecting baseline material in order to implement the youth basic income project in a more developed direction by measuring the satisfaction level related to youth basic income. As a result of the satisfaction survey on youth basic income in Gyeonggi Province for the 3rd quarter, the overall level of satisfaction of the youth basic income project in Gyeonggi Province indicated that 82.7% (n=2,893) of the entire respondents were satisfied and this is a 2.1%p increase compared to the 1st quarter. The main reason for satisfaction (1st priority) was ‘Because it is paid out in Gyeonggi local currency which can be used like cash’ (30.7%), 'Because it is paid out to all youths aged 24 residing in Gyeonggi Province’ (29.6%) and ‘Because there are no conditions for receiving youth basic income such as being employed or carrying out job-seeking activities’ (14.7%). However, the reason (1st priority) for dissatisfaction of dissatisfied respondents (3.3%(n=117)) was ‘Because it was only being paid to youths aged 24 out of the youth group' (23.9%), ‘Because Gyeonggi local currency can't be used in supermarkets, department stores, entertainment stores and others’ (18.8%), ‘Because the currency can't be used in the main area of activity in case the area of activity differs from the region of residence’ (10.3%), indicating that they were dissatisfied with the payment subject and usage method. Although the satisfaction of ‘Payment method (I'm satisfied with having to apply every quarter)’ increases slightly compared to the 1st quarter, it has the lowest satisfaction level compared to others but as for ‘Delivery/payment (Gyeonggi local currency is well delivered and paid)’ item, it has demonstrated the highest satisfaction level.
Information accessibility Application procedure Payment amount and method Average out Average out Average out of 100 points of 100 points of 100 points Q1 Q3 Q1 Q3 Q1 Q3 Promotion on the Online application I'm satisfied with the youth basic income 78.30 74.52 procedure is 73.68 71.17 payment amount of 67.78 66.56 project is sufficient convenient youth basic income A lot of friends in the I'm satisfied with Gyeonggi local same age of 24 around 83.01 81.79 having to apply every 52.44 57.02 currency is well 80.54 83.32 the respondent are quarter delivered and paid. aware of the project Information related I fully understand to youth basic income Required documents the initiative behind 77.65 78.53 76.04 72.63 84.26 83.21 project can be are simple payment in Gyeonggi obtained easily local currency. 'Things to note' are There is no The period of application well informed upon 74.86 79.07 86.79 85.34 inconvenience in using 70.06 70.25 is sufficient application Gyeonggi local currency.
Looking at such survey results, the Gyeonggi Province's youth basic income project seems to have sufficiently reflected the initiative and role of giving out basic income to everyone which is the main objective of this project but areas such as conditions of payment subject and inconvenient payment method require improvements.
7 Q3 2019 Section 1 Satisfaction Survey Overview of Survey Report on Youth Ⅰ Background and purpose of survey 12 Basic Income in Ⅱ Survey details 12 Gyeonggi Province Ⅲ Survey design 13 Ⅳ Characteristics of respondents 14
Section 2 Table of Summary of Survey Result Contents Ⅰ Satisfaction related to youth basic income 18 Ⅱ Satisfaction related to local currency of 24 Gyeonggi Province
Section 3 Analysis of Survey Result
Ⅰ Satisfaction related to youth basic income 30 1. Information accessibility 30 1) Promotion regarding youth basic income project 2) Whether friends around the respondent who are 24 years old are aware 3) Information related to youth basic income project can be obtained easily 4) ‘Things to note’ are well informed upon application
2. Application procedure 45 1) Online application procedure is convenient 2) Satisfied about having to apply every quarter 3) Required documents are simple 4) The period of application is sufficient
3. Payment amount and method 60 1) Satisfied with payment amount of youth basic income 2) Gyeonggi local currency is well delivered & paid 3) Fully understand the initiative for receiving in Gyeonggi local currency 4) There is no inconvenience in using Gyeonggi local currency
4. Overall satisfaction of youth basic income project 75 4-1. Reason for satisfaction (priority) 4-2. Reason for dissatisfaction (priority)
5. Opinions regarding expansion of youth basic income project 88 1) Age group should be expanded instead of restricting to the age of 24 2) It should be expanded to other regions other than Gyeonggi Province 3) It should be expanded and applied to specific groups such as disabled, farmers and artists
6. Change of life after receiving youth basic income 100 6-1. Fields of change in life (priority) 6-2. Items that require improvements
7. Appropriate amount of youth basic income per quarter next year (2020) 113
8. When the youths came to learn about payment of youth basic income 116 (based on 1st quarter)
9. Importance of promotion of youth basic income 119
10. How the youths came to learn about youth basic income project (priority) 122
11. Social interest arising from receipt of youth basic income 127 1) Interest in human right expansion 2) Interest in economic freedom 3) Interest in resolving social inequality
12. Change in awareness arising from receipt of youth basic income 139 1) Positive change in awareness regarding future dream 2) Positive change in awareness regarding attitude towards life 3) Positive change in awareness regarding definition of family 4) Positive change in awareness regarding the role of nation/local government
Ⅱ Satisfaction related to local currency of Gyeonggi 154 1. Types of local currency selected upon receipt of youth basic income 154 1-1. Difficulties when using note (paper)-type of local currency 1-2. Difficulties when using card-type of local currency 1-3. Difficulties when using mobile-type of local currency
2. Preferred type of local currency in the future 166
3. Awareness on regions where Gyeonggi local currency can be used 169
4. Awareness on stores where Gyeonggi local currency can be used 172
5. Awareness on 30% income tax deduction when using Gyeonggi local currency 175
6. Awareness on payment method of Gyeonggi local currency 178
7. Awareness on revitalization of local economy and increase in sales of 181 small businesses
8. Improvements when using local currency 184
9. Change in the level of interest through receipt of local currency 187 1) Interest in revitalization of local economy 2) Interest in fostering local community
Section 4 Appendix Questionnaire 196 Section
1ㅣOverview of Survey Section 1 Overview of Survey
Ⅰ Background and purpose of survey
Ⅱ Survey details
Ⅲ Survey design
Ⅳ Characteristics of respondents Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
1. Overview of Survey part Ⅰ Background and purpose of survey
● As the name suggests, youth basic income in Gyeonggi Province is a trial project that started based on the concept of basic income and is playing the role of a stepping stone enabling to basic income to be given to everyone. Since April last year, Gyeonggi Province has been paying out youth basic income in local currency.
● The purpose of this survey is to collect baseline material to be reflected in future policies by analyzing the satisfaction of youth basic income in Gyeonggi Province on subjects who have received Gyeonggi local currency 3 times (1st quarter, 2nd quarter, 3rd quarter).
1. Overview of Survey part Ⅱ Survey details
● Materials regarding the measurement of satisfaction and change in awareness related to Gyeonggi Province’s youth basic income and Gyeonggi local currency are collected.
Overview of survey details
PartⅠ. Satisfaction related to youth basic income in Gyeonggi Province
- Information accessibility of youth basic income - Changes in life after receiving youth basic income project and its details - Application procedure of youth basic income project - Improvements of youth basic income in Gyeonggi - Payment amount and method of youth basic Province income project - Appropriate amount of youth basic income per - Overall satisfaction of youth basic income project quarter in 2020 - Reason for being satisfied and dissatisfied (priority) - When and how the youths came to learn about the - Awareness on expansion of youth basic income in youth basic income in Gyeonggi Province Gyeonggi Province - Change in interest from receipt of youth basic income in Gyeonggi Province
PartⅢ. Satisfaction related to Gyeonggi Province local currency
- Types of local currency selected upon application - Awareness on the impact of Gyeonggi local for youth basic income currency on the revitalization of local economy and - Difficulties in using local currency selected increase in sales of small businesses - Preferred type of local currency in the future - Improvements when using local currency in the - Awareness on method and benefits when using future local currency - Change in the level of interest arising from the use of local currency
12 Section 1. Overview of Survey
1. Overview of Survey part Ⅲ Survey design
● 24-year old youths residing in Gyeonggi Province who have received and are using local currency 3 times in total (1st quarter ~ 3rd quarter) out Subject of survey of the 1st quarter applicants (124,335 people) for youth basic income in Gyeonggi Province
No. of samples ● 3,500 people
Survey method ● Web survey using structured questionnaire
● The collected materials undergo Editing-Coding and are computed into data file Method of data ● The computed data file undergoes statistical processing by statistics processing package, SPSS
Survey period ● November 4 ~ November 15, 2019
Sampling error ● +1.6%p at 95% confidence level
13 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
1. Overview of Survey part Ⅳ Characteristics of respondents
No. of No. of Ratio Ratio cases cases (%) (%) (people) (people) All (3500) 100.0 All (City) (3500) 100.0 Male (1221) 34.9 Suwon (363) 10.4 Gender Female (2279) 65.1 Seongnam (254) 7.3 High graduate and (500) 14.3 Bucheon (261) 7.5 below Educational Anyang (185) 5.3 University student (826) 23.6 background Ansan (239) 6.8 University graduate (2174) 62.1 and above Yongin (270) 7.7 Single (3414) 97.5 Pyeongtaek (131) 3.7 Marital Married (79) 2.3 Gwangmyeong (96) 2.7 status Others (7) 0.2 Siheung (144) 4.1 1-person household (324) 9.3 Gunpo (84) 2.4 Married household (27) 0.8 Hwaseong (155) 4.4 Household Living with children (37) 1.1 Icheon (39) 1.1 type Living with parents (2846) 81.3 Gimpo (85) 2.4 Others (266) 7.6 Gwangju (86) 2.5 Student Anseong (37) 1.1 (327) 9.3 (with part-time job) Region of Hanam (43) 1.2 residence Student (438) 12.5 Uiwang (46) 1.3 Current (without part-time job) identity Unemployed (934) 26.7 Osan (53) 1.5 status Soldier (32) 0.9 Gwacheon (20) 0.6 Employed (1607) 45.9 Yeoju (20) 0.6 Others (162) 4.6 Yangpyeong County (20) 0.6 Below KRW 1 million (175) 5.0 Goyang (280) 8.0 KRW 1~below 2 million (546) 15.6 Uijeongbu (130) 3.7 KRW 2~below 3 million (842) 24.1 Namyangju (160) 4.6 Household KRW 3~below 4 million (450) 12.9 Paju (96) 2.7 income KRW 4~below 5 million (522) 14.9 Guri (54) 1.5 KRW 5~below 6 million (291) 8.3 Pocheon (35) 1.0 Above KRW 6 million (674) 19.3 Yangju (48) 1.4 High (398) 11.4 Dongducheon (26) 0.7 Standard Mid (1476) 42.2 Gapyeong County (20) 0.6 of living Low (1626) 46.5 Yeoncheon County (20) 0.6
14 Section 1. Overview of Survey
15 Section
2ㅣSummary of Survey Result Section 2 Summary of Survey Result
Ⅰ Satisfaction related to youth basic income
Ⅱ Satisfaction related to local currency of Gyeonggi Province Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
2. Summary of Survey Result part ⅠSatisfaction related to youth basic income
1. When and how the youths came to learn about youth basic income in Gyeonggi Province
● 52.5% of the respondents came to learn about the payment of youth basic income in Gyeonggi Province between ‘January ~ April 2019 (preparation period)’ followed by ‘April 2019 (1st registration period’(26.3%) and end of 2018 (when the ordinance was enacted)’(18.5%).
● 43.4% came to learn about it ‘Through people around them such as friends, parents and teachers’ followed by ‘Online advertisements (Facebook, YouTube, Naver, Daum and others)’(20.3%), and ‘Outdoor advertisements’ (11.3%).
[Figure 1] When and how the respondents came to learn about youth basic income in Gyeonggi Province
When they came to learn about it How they came to learn about it (based on 1 st priority in Q3) 1st quarter 3rd quarter Through people around them 43.4 60.4 52.5 Online advertisements 20.3 Outdoor advertisements 11.3 26.3 21.9 Mass media advertisements 8.7 15.718.5 1.6 2.1 0.3 0.7 News article 7.8 News such as TV news, radio news 2.9 End of Between Apr. May Others 2018 Jan.~Apr. 2019 2019 TV program on living information 0.3 2019 Others 5.2
2. Overall satisfaction of youth basic income project in Gyeonggi Province
● Overall satisfaction of youth basic income project in Gyeonggi Province for the 3rd quarter is indicated to be 77.22 points which is a slight increase compared to the 1st quarter (77.10 points). [ Satisfied: 82.7% (+2.1%p), Normal: 14.0% (-0.5%p), Dissatisfied: 3.3% (-1.6%p) ]
● As for the reasons for respondents being satisfied with the youth basic income project in Gyeonggi Province (n=2,893), ‘Because it is paid in Gyeonggi local currency which can be used like cash’ was the highest with 30.7% followed by ‘Because it is paid out to all youths aged 24 residing in Gyeonggi Province’ with (29.6%) and ‘Because there are no conditions for receiving youth basic income such as being employed or engaged in job-seeking activities’ (14.7%). (based on 1st priority)
● However, as for the reasons for respondents being dissatisfied with the youth basic income project in Gyeonggi Province (n=117), it was in the order of ‘Because it is only paid to youths aged 24 out of the youth group’ (23.9%), ‘Because Gyeonggi local currency can't be used in supermarkets, department stores and entertainment stores’ (18.8%) and ‘Because the currency can't be used in the main area of activity in case the area of activity differed from the region of residence’ (10.3%).
18 Section 2. Summary of Survey Result
[Figure 2] Overall satisfaction of youth basic income project in Gyeonggi Province
77.10 77.22 Reason for satisfaction Reason for dissatisfaction st st Average (based on 1 priority)(n=2,893) (based on 1 priority)(n=117) out of 100 points ㆍBecause it is paid in Gyeonggi ㆍBecause it is only paid to youths regional currency which can be aged 24 out of the youth group Satisfied used like cash 23.9% 80.6 82.7 30.7% ㆍBecause Gyeonggi regional currency Average ㆍBecause it is paid to all youths can't be used in supermarkets, aged 24 residing in Gyeonggi department stores, entertainment Dissatisfied Province stores and others 29.6% 18.8% ㆍBecause there are no conditions ㆍBecause the currency can't be for receiving youth basic income used in the main area of activity 14.5 14.0 such as employed or carrying out in case the area of activity differed 4.9 3.3 job seeking activities from the region of residence General General 14.7% 10.3% satisfaction in Q1 satisfaction in Q3
3. Satisfaction of youth basic income project in Gyeonggi Province per aspect
1) Information accessibility
● As for the satisfaction regarding information accessibility, ‘A lot of friends in the same age of 24 around the respondent aged 24 are aware’ ranked the highest with 81.79 points while ‘Things to note are well informed upon application’ was 74.52 points, indicating a relatively low level of satisfaction.
● Compared to the 1st quarter, ‘Things to note are well informed upon application’ (+4.21p), and ‘Information related to youth basic income project can be obtained easily’ (+0.88) have increased while ‘Promotion on the youth basic income project is sufficient’ (-3.78p), and ‘A lot of friends in the same age of 24 around the respondent are aware of the project’ (-1.22p) have decreased slightly.
[Figure 3] Satisfaction of youth basic income in Gyeonggi Province per aspect – Information accessibility 1st quarter 3rd quarter
83.01 81.59 78.30 77.65 78.53 79.07 74.52 74.86
GAP GAP GAP GAP -3.78 -1.22 +0.88 +4.21
Promotion on the A lot of friends in the Information related to 'Things to note' are youth basic income same age of 24 around youth basic income project well informed upon project is sufficient the respondent are aware can be obtained easily application
19 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
2) Application procedure
● As for the satisfaction regarding application procedure, ‘The period of application is sufficient’ was the highest with 85.34 points and ‘I'm satisfied with having to apply every quarter’ was 57.02 points, indicating a relatively low level of satisfaction.
● Compared to the 1st quarter, the level of satisfaction regarding application procedure has dropped slightly other than ‘I'm satisfied with having to apply every quarter’ (+4.58p).
[Figure 4] Satisfaction of youth basic income in Gyeonggi Province per aspect – Application procedure 1st quarter 3rd quarter
86.79 85.34 76.04 72.63 73.68 71.17
52.44 57.02
GAP GAP GAP GAP -2.51 +4.58 -3.41 -1.45
Online application I'm satisfied with having Required documents The period of procedure is convenient to apply every quarter are simple application is sufficient
3) Payment amount and method
● As for the satisfaction regarding the payment amount and method, ‘Gyeonggi local currency is well delivered and paid' was the highest with 83.32 points and ‘I'm satisfied with the payment amount of youth basic income’ was 66.56 points, indicating a relatively low level of satisfaction.
● Compared to the 1st quarter, ‘Gyeonggi local currency is well delivered and paid’ (+2.78), and ‘There is no inconvenience in using Gyeonggi local currency’ (+0.19p) have increased while ‘I'm satisfied with the payment amount of youth basic income’ (-1.22p), and ‘Fully understand the initiative behind payment in Gyeonggi local currency.’ (-1.05p) have dropped slightly.
[Figure 5] Satisfaction of youth basic income in Gyeonggi Province per aspect – Payment amount and method 1st quarter 3rd quarter
84.26 83.32 83.21 80.54 70.06 70.25 67.78 66.56
GAP GAP GAP GAP -1.22 +2.78 -1.05 +0.19
I'm satisfied with the Gyeonggi regional Fully understand the There is no inconvenience payment amount of currency is well initiative behind payment in in using Gyeonggi regional youth basic income delivered and paid Gyeonggi regional currency currency
20 Section 2. Summary of Survey Result
4. Opinions regarding expansion of youth basic income payment
● Regarding the expansion of youth basic income payment, ‘Youth basic income has to be implemented in other regions (cities and provinces) other than Gyeonggi Province’ was the highest with 69.45 points.
● Compared to the 1st quarter, there has been a slight decrease regarding the opinion on the expansion of youth basic income payment.
[Figure 6] Opinion on expansion of youth basic income payment 1st quarter 3rd quarter
68.53 71.31 69.45 65.05 66.86 66.19
GAP GAP GAP -3.48 -1.86 -0.67
Youth basic income should not Payment of youth basic income Basic income such as youth basic be restricted to the age of 24 must be implemented in other income must be expanded and and the youth age group must regions(cities and provinces) applied to specific groups such as be expanded other than Gyeonggi Province the disabied, farmers and artists
5. Appropriate amount per quarter upon payment of youth basic income in 2020
● As for the appropriate amount per quarter upon payment of youth basic income in 2020, ‘KRW 200,000 ~ below KRW 300,000’ was the highest with 47.6% followed by ‘KRW 300,000~ below KRW 400,000’ (28.4%) and ‘KRW 400,000~below KRW 500,000’ (12.9%).
● Compared to the 1st quarter, increase took place in below KRW 300,000 and for above KRW 300,000, it decreased slightly.
[Figure 7] Appropriate amount per quarter upon payment of youth basic income in 2020
1st quarter 3rd quarter 44.3 47.6
29.5 28.4
16.3 12.9 6.1 6.8 3.5 3.0 0.8 0.7
Below KRW KRW 100,000 KRW 200,000 KRW 300,000 KRW 400,000 Others 100,000 ~ below KRW ~ below KRW ~ below KRW ~ below KRW 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000
21 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
6. Changes in life after receiving youth basic income
● Regarding changes in life after receiving youth basic income, 65.4% responded that ‘There was a change’ which was higher than ‘No change’ (11.9%) and this is a 5.1%p increase compared to 'There was a change' (60.3%) in the 1st quarter.
● As for details of changes in respondents who responded that there was a change in life arising from the youth basic income (n=2,290), ‘Was able to attempt self-development’ was the highest with 30.4% followed by ‘Was able to reduce financial burden when meeting friends and others’ (28.0%), ‘Was able to buy things that respondents had wanted to buy’ (13.6%) and 'Was able to travel or enjoy leisure’ (9.9%).
● On the other hand, as for the opinions on improvement of youth basic income of respondents who responded that there was no change in life arising from the youth basic income (n=416), ‘Payment amount has to be increased’ was the highest with 23.6% followed by ‘Areas where it can be used must be extended to areas other than the place of residence’ (22.8%), and ‘The problem of not being able to receive basic living subsidy has to be resolved' (18.8%) so opinions regarding the payment amount, payment subject and expansion of regions where it can be used were relatively high.
[Figure 8] Changes in life after receiving youth basic income
62.64 65.52 Changes in life Improvements Average st st out of (based on 1 priority)(n=2,290) (based on 1 priority)(n=416) 100 points ㆍWas able to attempt self- ㆍPayment amount has to be There development 30.4% increased 23.6% has been 60.3 65.4 ㆍ a change ㆍWas able to reduce financial Areas where it can be used must burden when meeting friends be extended tp areas other than and others 28.0% the place of residence 22.8% ㆍWas able to buy things that respondents had wanted to ㆍThe problem of not being able to 23.8 22.7 buy 13.6% receive basic living substance has to be resolved 18.8% ㆍWas able to travel or enjoy 15.9 11.9 leisure 9.9% ㆍPayment subject must be extened without restricting to 24-year old Changes in life Changes in life after receiving after receiving youths 14.2% youth basic youth basic income in Q1 income in Q3
22 Section 2. Summary of Survey Result
7. Change in level of social interest after receiving youth basic income
● Regarding change in level of social interest after receiving youth basic income, ‘Interest in economic freedom’ was the highest with 69.13 points followed by ‘Interest in solving social inequality’ (63.69 points) and ‘Interest in human right expansion’ (60.02 points).
● Compared to the 1st quarter, level of social interest after receiving youth basic income dropped slightly.
[Figure 9] Changes in level of social interest after receiving youth basic income
1st quarter 3rd quarter 69.91 69.13 61.99 60.02 64.32 63.69
GAP GAP GAP -1.97 -0.78 -0.63
Increase in human right Interest in economic Interest in resolving social expansion increased freedom increased inequality increased
8. Change in awareness after receiving youth basic income
● Regarding change in awareness after receiving youth basic income, ‘Awareness on the role of nation/local government’ was the highest with 66.29 points followed by ‘Awareness on definition of family’ (60.01 points) and ‘Awareness on positive attitude towards life’ (59.64 points).
● Compared to the 1st quarter, change in awareness after receiving youth basic income dropped slightly.
[Figure 10] Change in awareness after receiving youth basic income 1st quarter 3rd quarter
69.30 66.29 61.86 59.64 61.57 60.01 58.54 56.89
GAP GAP GAP GAP -1.65 -2.22 -1.56 -3.01
Awareness on future Attitude towards life Awareness on the Awareness on the role of dream changed positively changed positively. definition of family nation/local government changed positively. changed positively.
23 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
2. Summary of Survey Result part Ⅱ Satisfaction related to local currency in Gyeonggi Province
1. Type of local currency selected for receiving youth basic income
● As for the type of local currency selected upon receiving youth basic income, ‘Card-type’ was the highest with 89.3% followed by ‘Mobile-type’ (10.3%) and ‘Note (paper)-type’ (0.5%).
● As for inconvenience when using the local currency selected, it was ‘Restriction in business field and type of franchise store’ (37.5%) for paper-type and ‘Finding the stores where it can be used’ (55.0%, 41.4% respectively) for card-type and mobile-type.
[Figure 11] Type of local currency selected for receiving youth basic income
1st quarter 3rd quarter 88.8 89.3
10.4 10.3 0.8 0.5
Note(paper)-type Card-type Mobile-type
Inconvenience when using Inconvenience when using Inconvenience when using note(paper)-type card-type mobile-type (Base: Selected note(paper)-type of (Base: Selected card-type of (Base: Selected mobile-type of local currency, n=16) local currency, n=3,124) local currency, n=360) Item Ratio (%) Item Ratio (%) Item Ratio (%) Restriction in business Finding stores where it Finding stores where it 37.5 55.0 41.4 field and type of stores can be used can be used Restricted business fields Restricted business fields Storage and possession 25.0 27.6 24.7 and types of stores and types of stores Finding stores where it 25.0 Storage and possession 8.1 Inconvenient payment can be used 16.1 procedure Unfriendly stores arising Restriction of cash receipt 6.3 from local currency 3.1 Inconvenient to download 5.6 Unfriendly stores arising transaction and install app from local currency 6.3 Inconvenient payment Unfriendly stores arising from 1.0 5.6 transaction procedure local currency transaction Others 5.2 Others 6.7
24 Section 2. Summary of Survey Result
2. Awareness regarding method and benefits when using local currency
● As for awareness regarding method and benefits when using local currency, ‘Use of Gyeonggi local currency is prohibited in supermarkets, department stores, Super supermarkets (SSM), entertainment stores and others’ had the highest awareness with 97.7% and ‘Cash receipt and 30% income tax deduction can be received when local currency is used’ had relatively low awareness with 70.5%.
[Figure 12] Awareness regarding method and benefits when using local currency
Q. Gyeonggi local currency is being issued by 31 Q. The use of Gyeonggi local currency is prohibited cities and counties in Gyeonggi Province and it in supermarkets, department stores, Super can only be used within the cities and counties. supermarkets (SSM), entertainment stores and others.
Aware Not aware Aware Not aware
rd rd 3 95.8 4.2 3 97.7 2.3 quarter quarter
GAP +0.6 GAP +0.2
1st 1st quarter 95.2 4.8 quarter 97.5 2.5
Q. Cash receipt and 30% income tax deductions Q. Card-type of Gyeonggi local currency can be can be received when local currency is used. used in any franchise stores.
Aware Not aware Aware Not aware
3rd 3rd quarter 70.5 29.5 quarter 83.7 16.3
GAP -1.3 GAP +0.1
1st 1st quarter 71.8 28.2 quarter 83.6 16.4
25 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
3. Preferred type of local currency when receiving youth basic income in the future
● As for the preferred type of local currency when receiving youth basic income in the future, ‘Card-type’ was the highest with 69.2% followed by ‘Mobile-type’ (27.6%) and ‘Note (paper)-type’ (3.3%).
● Compared to the 1st quarter, the preference of 'Paper-type' and 'Card-type' decreased slightly while ‘Mobile-type’ (+2.0%p) increased slightly.
[Figure 13] Preferred type of local currency when receiving youth basic income in the future
1st quarter 3rd quarter 70.0 69.2
25.6 27.6
4.5 3.3
Note(paper)-type Card-type Mobile-type
4. Future improvements when using local currency
● As for future improvements when using local currency, ‘Expansion and diversification of franchise store’ was the highest with 53.5% followed by ‘Expansion of usage area to desired regions within Gyeonggi Province other than the place of residence’ (17.6%) and ‘Education regarding franchise store merchants' (10.3%).
● Compared to the 1st quarter, the increase of ‘Expansion of usage area to desired regions within Gyeonggi Province other than the place of residence’ (+3.1%p) is significant.
[Figure 14] Future improvements when using local currency 1st quarter 3rd quarter
54.3 53.5
14.5 17.6 12.1 10.5 10.3 9.3 4.5 4.9 2.9 2.0 1.2 2.4
Expansion and Expansion of Education Promotion Reinforcement Education on Others diversification usage area to desired regarding (Posting of of payment usage method for of franchise regions within franchise store franchise stores convenience consumers stores Gyeonggi Province merchants in bulletin boards other than the place and others) of residence
26 Section 2. Summary of Survey Result
5. Change in the level of interest arising from receipt of local currency
● As for change in the level of interest arising from receipt of local currency, ‘Interest in the revitalization of local economy increased’ was 71.39 points and ‘Interest in fostering local community increased’ was 66.54 points so ‘Interest in fostering local community increased’ was relatively high.
● Compared to the 1st quarter, the level of interest arising from receipt of local currency dropped slightly.
[Figure 15] Change in the level of interest arising from receipt of local currency
1st quarter 3rd quarter
73.69 71.39 69.91 66.54
GAP GAP -2.30 -3.37
Interest in the revitalization of Interest in fostering regional regional economy increased community increased
27 Section
3ㅣAnalysis of Survey Result Section 3 Analysis of Survey Result
Ⅰ Satisfaction related to youth basic income
Ⅱ Satisfaction related to local currency of Gyeonggi Province Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
3. Analysis of Survey Result part ⅠSatisfaction related to youth basic income
1 Information accessibility of youth basic income project
Q Information accessibility of youth basic income project
As for the satisfaction regarding information accessibility of the youth basic income project, 'A lot of friends in the same age of 24 around the respondent are aware’ was the highest with 81.79 points followed by ‘'Things to note' are well informed upon application' (79.07 points) and ‘Information related to youth basic income project can be obtained easily’ (78.53 points).
[Figure 16] Information accessibility of youth basic income project [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: Point]
81.79 79.07 78.53
74.52
Promotion on youth basic A lot of friends in the Information related to 'Things to note' are well income project is sufficient same age of 24 around the youth basic income project informed upon application respondent are aware (subject, application method, (Application each quarter, payment method etc.) can payment overlapping with be obtained easily other supports not possible)
30 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
[Table 1-1] Information accessibility of youth basic income project – Per respondent characteristics
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: Point]
Promotion on A lot of friends Information related 'Things to note' youth basic in the same age to youth basic are well informed income project of 24 around the income project upon application No. is sufficient respondent (subject, application (Application each of cases are aware method, payment quarter, payment method etc.) can be overlapping with obtained easily other supports not possible)
All (3500) 74.52 81.79 78.53 79.07
Male (1221) 76.02 82.08 78.69 79.30 Gender Female (2279) 73.72 81.63 78.44 78.95
High graduate and below (500) 72.65 77.15 76.30 77.05 Educational University student (826) 75.15 83.02 78.93 79.45 background University graduate and above (2174) 74.71 82.38 78.89 79.39
Single (3414) 74.52 81.77 78.60 79.10 Marital Married (79) 74.37 82.28 75.00 77.53 status Others (7) 78.57 82.14 85.71 82.14
1-person household (324) 75.31 80.79 79.24 79.32
Married household (27) 70.37 80.56 72.22 78.70 Household Lives with children (37) 75.68 82.43 76.35 77.70 type Lives with parents (2846) 74.56 82.16 78.68 79.19
Others (266) 73.40 79.04 76.97 77.73
Student (with part-time job) (327) 77.14 83.64 80.81 80.89
Student (without part-time job) (438) 73.63 81.16 78.25 79.28
Current Unemployed (934) 74.22 81.91 77.92 78.13 identity status Soldier (32) 73.44 77.34 70.31 67.19 Employed (1607) 74.77 82.09 79.03 79.50
Others (162) 71.14 76.85 74.85 78.40
Below KRW 1 million (175) 74.00 78.29 76.43 75.29
KRW 1~below 2 million (546) 73.31 78.94 77.01 77.34
KRW 2~below 3 million (842) 75.18 81.56 78.71 79.51 Household KRW 3~below 4 million (450) 74.50 82.06 79.00 78.83 income KRW 4~below 5 million (522) 73.85 82.90 78.40 79.65
KRW 5~below 6 million (291) 74.05 82.47 77.66 80.67
Above KRW 6 million (674) 75.56 83.94 80.23 79.93
High (398) 76.63 82.98 80.53 80.90 Standard Mid (1476) 73.87 82.18 78.29 79.42 of living Low (1626) 74.60 81.13 78.26 78.31
31 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Table 1-2] Information accessibility of youth basic income project – Per region of residence
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: Point]
Promotion on A lot of friends Information related 'Things to note' are well youth basic in the same age to youth basic income informed upon application No. income project of 24 around the project (subject, (Application each quarter, of cases is sufficient respondent are application method, payment overlapping aware payment method etc.) with other supports not can be obtained easily possible)
All (City) (3500) 74.52 81.79 78.53 79.07
Suwon (363) 73.62 83.20 79.48 80.17
Seongnam (254) 74.21 82.19 73.52 74.90
Bucheon (261) 77.78 85.06 79.79 81.32
Anyang (185) 74.86 82.03 79.32 81.08
Ansan (239) 75.21 83.58 80.75 79.39
Yongin (270) 73.43 81.02 79.35 79.63
Pyeongtaek (131) 73.66 80.34 80.34 76.72
Gwangmyeong (96) 70.05 78.65 78.39 80.99
Siheung (144) 74.13 86.11 78.99 80.38
Gunpo (84) 72.92 81.55 82.14 81.55
Hwaseong (155) 72.90 80.97 75.65 75.16
Icheon (39) 75.00 82.05 76.28 76.28
Gimpo (85) 73.24 77.35 79.12 77.94
Gwangju (86) 75.29 78.49 78.49 81.10
Anseong (37) 72.30 76.35 75.68 77.03 Region of Hanam (43) 83.72 80.81 84.88 87.79 residence Uiwang (46) 75.00 82.07 76.63 80.43
Osan (53) 79.72 84.43 79.72 78.77
Gwacheon (20) 76.25 78.75 76.25 77.50
Yeoju (20) 80.00 85.00 78.75 81.25
Yangpyeong County (20) 77.50 78.75 82.50 77.50
Goyang (280) 75.71 81.34 79.64 80.18
Uijeongbu (130) 75.19 82.31 78.65 78.65
Namyangju (160) 71.56 79.84 75.94 77.66
Paju (96) 75.78 80.73 77.60 78.39
Guri (54) 78.24 83.80 79.17 75.46
Pocheon (35) 72.86 72.14 71.43 72.86
Yangju (48) 75.52 83.85 77.08 81.25
Dongducheon (26) 64.42 81.73 78.85 79.81
Gapyeong County (20) 71.25 73.75 72.50 75.00
Yeoncheon County (20) 68.75 73.75 77.50 75.00
32 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
1) Promotion regarding youth basic income project
Regarding the question on whether promotion regarding the youth basic income project was sufficient, 73.4% of the respondents chose ‘Yes’ (Very so: 31.3% + Mostly so: 42.1%) which was higher than 6.3% who chose ‘Not so’ (Not so much: 5.9% + Not at all: 0.4%).
[Figure 17] Promotion regarding youth basic income project [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
Not so Yes Not so 6.3% 42.1 31.3 Average Yes 74.52 out 73.4% of 100 Average 20.3 points 20.3%
5.9 0.4
Not at all Not so mush Average Mostly so Very so
Analysis per characteristics
● As for the response, 'Yes' per respondent characteristics, it was relatively high in male with higher educational level, who were students (with part-time job) and with higher standard of living.
● As for the response 'Yes' per region of residence, Hanam City was the highest with 90.7% followed by Yeoju City (85.0%, n=20 and Osan City (84.9%).
33 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Table 2-1] Promotion regarding youth basic income project – Per respondent characteristics
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
[Average No. of Not at Not so Mostly Very Average [No] [Average] [Quite so] converted cases all much so so to 100 pts]
All (3500) 0.4 5.9 20.3 42.1 31.3 6.3 20.3 73.4 74.52
Male (1221) 0.5 5.2 18.5 41.4 34.4 5.7 18.5 75.8 76.02 Gender Female (2279) 0.4 6.2 21.3 42.4 29.7 6.6 21.3 72.1 73.72
High graduate and below (500) 0.6 6.6 23.8 39.6 29.4 7.2 23.8 69.0 72.65 Educational University student (826) 0.4 5.0 21.1 40.9 32.7 5.3 21.1 73.6 75.15 background University graduate and above (2174) 0.4 6.0 19.3 43.1 31.3 6.4 19.3 74.3 74.71
Single (3414) 0.4 5.9 20.4 42.0 31.3 6.3 20.4 73.3 74.52 Marital Married (79) 2.5 3.8 19.0 43.0 31.6 6.3 19.0 74.7 74.37 status Others (7) 0.0 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 0.0 14.3 85.7 78.57
1-person household (324) 0.3 7.4 19.1 37.0 36.1 7.7 19.1 73.1 75.31
Married household (27) 7.4 0.0 22.2 44.4 25.9 7.4 22.2 70.4 70.37 Household Lives with children (37) 0.0 5.4 16.2 48.6 29.7 5.4 16.2 78.4 75.68 type Lives with parents (2846) 0.4 5.5 20.4 42.9 30.8 5.9 20.4 73.7 74.56
Others (266) 0.0 8.6 21.1 38.3 32.0 8.6 21.1 70.3 73.40
Student (with part-time job) (327) 0.3 4.0 16.2 45.9 33.6 4.3 16.2 79.5 77.14
Student (without part-time job) (438) 0.5 4.1 24.9 41.6 29.0 4.6 24.9 70.5 73.63
Current Unemployed (934) 0.6 5.2 21.1 42.6 30.4 5.9 21.1 73.0 74.22 identity status Soldier (32) 0.0 3.1 18.8 59.4 18.8 3.1 18.8 78.1 73.44
Employed (1607) 0.3 7.0 18.9 40.8 33.0 7.3 18.9 73.7 74.77
Others (162) 0.0 6.8 26.5 42.0 24.7 6.8 26.5 66.7 71.14
Below KRW 1 million (175) 0.6 2.9 28.6 36.0 32.0 3.4 28.6 68.0 74.00
KRW 1~below 2 million (546) 0.5 6.6 23.3 38.3 31.3 7.1 23.3 69.6 73.31
KRW 2~below 3 million (842) 0.4 4.4 20.7 43.3 31.2 4.8 20.7 74.6 75.18 Household KRW 3~below 4 million (450) 0.4 6.7 18.9 42.4 31.6 7.1 18.9 74.0 74.50 income KRW 4~below 5 million (522) 0.2 6.7 21.5 40.8 30.8 6.9 21.5 71.6 73.85
KRW 5~below 6 million (291) 0.7 6.5 17.9 45.7 29.2 7.2 17.9 74.9 74.05
Above KRW 6 million (674) 0.3 6.4 16.6 44.2 32.5 6.7 16.6 76.7 75.56
High (398) 0.5 3.8 19.8 40.5 35.4 4.3 19.8 75.9 76.63 Standard Mid (1476) 0.6 5.6 19.8 45.7 28.3 6.2 19.8 74.0 73.87 of living Low (1626) 0.2 6.6 21.0 39.2 33.1 6.8 21.0 72.3 74.60
34 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
[Table 2-2] Promotion regarding youth basic income project – Per region of residence
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
[Average No. of Not at Not so Mostly Very Average [No] [Average] [Quite so] converted cases all much so so to 100 pts]
All (City) (3500) 0.4 5.9 20.3 42.1 31.3 6.3 20.3 73.4 74.52
Suwon (363) 0.6 7.7 18.2 43.8 29.8 8.3 18.2 73.6 73.62
Seongnam (254) 0.4 4.3 22.0 44.5 28.7 4.7 22.0 73.2 74.21
Bucheon (261) 0.0 3.4 19.2 40.2 37.2 3.4 19.2 77.4 77.78
Anyang (185) 0.5 7.6 16.2 43.2 32.4 8.1 16.2 75.7 74.86
Ansan (239) 1.3 4.2 22.6 36.4 35.6 5.4 22.6 72.0 75.21
Yongin (270) 0.4 6.3 20.7 44.4 28.1 6.7 20.7 72.6 73.43
Pyeongtaek (131) 0.0 6.9 21.4 42.0 29.8 6.9 21.4 71.8 73.66
Gwangmyeong (96) 1.0 12.5 26.0 26.0 34.4 13.5 26.0 60.4 70.05
Siheung (144) 0.0 4.2 25.0 41.0 29.9 4.2 25.0 70.8 74.13
Gunpo (84) 0.0 7.1 22.6 41.7 28.6 7.1 22.6 70.2 72.92
Hwaseong (155) 0.6 5.2 25.2 40.0 29.0 5.8 25.2 69.0 72.90
Icheon (39) 0.0 2.6 25.6 41.0 30.8 2.6 25.6 71.8 75.00
Gimpo (85) 1.2 7.1 15.3 50.6 25.9 8.2 15.3 76.5 73.24
Gwangju (86) 0.0 4.7 19.8 45.3 30.2 4.7 19.8 75.6 75.29
Anseong (37) 0.0 5.4 27.0 40.5 27.0 5.4 27.0 67.6 72.30 Region of Hanam (43) 0.0 0.0 9.3 46.5 44.2 0.0 9.3 90.7 83.72 residence Uiwang (46) 2.2 6.5 17.4 37.0 37.0 8.7 17.4 73.9 75.00
Osan (53) 0.0 3.8 11.3 47.2 37.7 3.8 11.3 84.9 79.72
Gwacheon (20) 0.0 5.0 20.0 40.0 35.0 5.0 20.0 75.0 76.25
Yeoju (20) 0.0 0.0 15.0 50.0 35.0 0.0 15.0 85.0 80.00
Yangpyeong County (20) 0.0 5.0 15.0 45.0 35.0 5.0 15.0 80.0 77.50
Goyang (280) 0.0 6.1 18.6 41.8 33.6 6.1 18.6 75.4 75.71
Uijeongbu (130) 0.0 6.9 17.7 43.1 32.3 6.9 17.7 75.4 75.19
Namyangju (160) 1.3 6.9 22.5 43.1 26.3 8.1 22.5 69.4 71.56
Paju (96) 0.0 4.2 19.8 44.8 31.3 4.2 19.8 76.0 75.78
Guri (54) 0.0 0.0 25.9 35.2 38.9 0.0 25.9 74.1 78.24
Pocheon (35) 0.0 2.9 31.4 37.1 28.6 2.9 31.4 65.7 72.86
Yangju (48) 0.0 8.3 14.6 43.8 33.3 8.3 14.6 77.1 75.52
Dongducheon (26) 0.0 23.1 15.4 42.3 19.2 23.1 15.4 61.5 64.42
Gapyeong County (20) 0.0 5.0 20.0 60.0 15.0 5.0 20.0 75.0 71.25
Yeoncheon County (20) 0.0 10.0 25.0 45.0 20.0 10.0 25.0 65.0 68.75
35 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
2) Whether friends in the same age of 24 around the respondent are aware
As for the question on whether a lot of friends in the same age of 24 around the respondent were aware, 83.2% responded by saying ‘Yes’ (Very so: 49.8% + Mostly so: 33.4%) which was higher than 5.4% who responded by saying ‘Not so’ (Not so much: 4.9% + Not at all: 0.5%%).
[Figure 18] Whether friends in the same age of 24 around [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %] the respondent are aware
Not so Yes
49.8
Not so 5.4% Average 33.4 Yes 81.79 out 83.2% of 100 Average points 11.4% 11.4 4.9 0.5
Not at all Not so mush Average Mostly so Very so
Analysis per characteristics
● As for the response, 'Yes' per respondent characteristics, it was relatively high in male, university graduates, who were currently students (with part-time job) and with household income of KRW 4 ~ below 5 million.
● As for the response 'Yes' per region of residence, Yangju City was the highest with 89.6% followed by Osan City (88.7%) and Siheung City (87.5%).
36 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
[Table 3-1] Whether friends in the same age of 24 around the respondent are aware – Per respondent characteristics [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %] [Average No. of Not at Not so Mostly Very Average [No] [Average] [Quite so] converted cases all much so so to 100 pts]
All (3500) 0.5 4.9 11.4 33.4 49.8 5.4 11.4 83.2 81.59
Male (1221) 0.7 4.3 11.5 33.1 50.5 5.0 11.5 83.5 82.08 Gender Female (2279) 0.4 5.1 11.4 33.5 49.5 5.6 11.4 83.0 81.63
High graduate and below (500) 1.4 6.8 17.8 29.8 44.2 8.2 17.8 74.0 77.15 Educational University student (826) 0.1 3.6 11.0 34.5 50.7 3.8 11.0 85.2 83.02 background University graduate and above (2174) 0.5 4.9 10.1 33.8 50.8 5.3 10.1 84.5 82.38
Single (3414) 0.5 4.9 11.5 33.5 49.7 5.3 11.5 83.2 81.77 Marital Married (79) 2.5 3.8 10.1 29.1 54.4 6.3 10.1 83.5 82.28 status Others (7) 0.0 14.3 0.0 28.6 57.1 14.3 0.0 85.7 82.14
1-person household (324) 0.3 6.2 12.0 33.0 48.5 6.5 12.0 81.5 80.79
Married household (27) 3.7 7.4 11.1 18.5 59.3 11.1 11.1 77.8 80.56 Household Lives with children (37) 0.0 2.7 10.8 40.5 45.9 2.7 10.8 86.5 82.43 type Lives with parents (2846) 0.4 4.8 11.0 33.3 50.5 5.2 11.0 83.8 82.16
Others (266) 1.5 4.1 15.4 34.6 44.4 5.6 15.4 78.9 79.04
Student (with part-time job) (327) 0.6 4.9 8.3 31.8 54.4 5.5 8.3 86.2 83.64
Student (without part-time job) (438) 0.0 4.8 10.0 40.9 44.3 4.8 10.0 85.2 81.16
Current Unemployed (934) 0.5 3.7 13.1 32.9 49.8 4.3 13.1 82.7 81.91 identity status Soldier (32) 0.0 3.1 18.8 43.8 34.4 3.1 18.8 78.1 77.34
Employed (1607) 0.5 5.1 11.4 31.4 51.5 5.6 11.4 82.9 82.09
Others (162) 1.9 9.3 10.5 36.4 42.0 11.1 10.5 78.4 76.85
Below KRW 1 million (175) 0.6 3.4 16.0 42.3 37.7 4.0 16.0 80.0 78.29
KRW 1~below 2 million (546) 0.2 8.6 14.1 29.5 47.6 8.8 14.1 77.1 78.94
KRW 2~below 3 million (842) 0.7 3.9 11.9 35.4 48.1 4.6 11.9 83.5 81.56 Household KRW 3~below 4 million (450) 0.7 3.8 12.4 32.9 50.2 4.4 12.4 83.1 82.06 income KRW 4~below 5 million (522) 0.6 4.8 8.2 35.2 51.1 5.4 8.2 86.4 82.90
KRW 5~below 6 million (291) 0.3 5.5 10.3 31.6 52.2 5.8 10.3 83.8 82.47
Above KRW 6 million (674) 0.4 3.9 9.8 31.3 54.6 4.3 9.8 85.9 83.94
High (398) 0.8 4.5 11.8 27.9 55.0 5.3 11.8 82.9 82.98 Standard Mid (1476) 0.4 4.1 11.3 34.8 49.4 4.5 11.3 84.2 82.18 of living Low (1626) 0.6 5.7 11.4 33.4 49.0 6.2 11.4 82.3 81.13
37 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Table 3-2] Whether friends in the same age of 24 around the respondent are aware – Per region of residence [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %] [Average No. of Not at Not so Mostly Very Average [No] [Average] [Quite so] converted cases all much so so to 100 pts]
All (City) (3500) 0.5 4.9 11.4 33.4 49.8 5.4 11.4 83.2 81.79
Suwon (363) 0.3 5.2 8.5 33.3 52.6 5.5 8.5 86.0 83.20
Seongnam (254) 0.4 4.7 9.8 35.8 49.2 5.1 9.8 85.0 82.19
Bucheon (261) 0.4 1.1 11.9 31.0 55.6 1.5 11.9 86.6 85.06
Anyang (185) 0.5 3.8 11.4 35.7 48.6 4.3 11.4 84.3 82.03
Ansan (239) 0.0 4.2 10.9 31.4 53.6 4.2 10.9 84.9 83.58
Yongin (270) 0.4 3.3 12.6 39.3 44.4 3.7 12.6 83.7 81.02
Pyeongtaek (131) 0.0 5.3 12.2 38.2 44.3 5.3 12.2 82.4 80.34
Gwangmyeong (96) 2.1 6.3 13.5 31.3 46.9 8.3 13.5 78.1 78.65
Siheung (144) 0.0 3.5 9.0 27.1 60.4 3.5 9.0 87.5 86.11
Gunpo (84) 0.0 4.8 13.1 33.3 48.8 4.8 13.1 82.1 81.55
Hwaseong (155) 1.3 6.5 10.3 31.0 51.0 7.7 10.3 81.9 80.97
Icheon (39) 0.0 2.6 17.9 28.2 51.3 2.6 17.9 79.5 82.05
Gimpo (85) 0.0 11.8 14.1 27.1 47.1 11.8 14.1 74.1 77.35
Gwangju (86) 1.2 5.8 14.0 36.0 43.0 7.0 14.0 79.1 78.49
Anseong (37) 0.0 5.4 21.6 35.1 37.8 5.4 21.6 73.0 76.35 Region of Hanam (43) 0.0 9.3 11.6 25.6 53.5 9.3 11.6 79.1 80.81 residence Uiwang (46) 2.2 4.3 8.7 32.6 52.2 6.5 8.7 84.8 82.07
Osan (53) 0.0 1.9 9.4 37.7 50.9 1.9 9.4 88.7 84.43
Gwacheon (20) 0.0 5.0 10.0 50.0 35.0 5.0 10.0 85.0 78.75
Yeoju (20) 0.0 0.0 15.0 30.0 55.0 0.0 15.0 85.0 85.00
Yangpyeong County (20) 0.0 10.0 10.0 35.0 45.0 10.0 10.0 80.0 78.75
Goyang (280) 0.7 5.7 12.1 30.4 51.1 6.4 12.1 81.4 81.34
Uijeongbu (130) 0.8 3.1 13.1 32.3 50.8 3.8 13.1 83.1 82.31
Namyangju (160) 0.6 7.5 11.3 33.1 47.5 8.1 11.3 80.6 79.84
Paju (96) 1.0 10.4 5.2 31.3 52.1 11.5 5.2 83.3 80.73
Guri (54) 1.9 1.9 11.1 29.6 55.6 3.7 11.1 85.2 83.80
Pocheon (35) 2.9 8.6 20.0 34.3 34.3 11.4 20.0 68.6 72.14
Yangju (48) 0.0 4.2 6.3 39.6 50.0 4.2 6.3 89.6 83.85
Dongducheon (26) 0.0 3.8 11.5 38.5 46.2 3.8 11.5 84.6 81.73
Gapyeong County (20) 0.0 5.0 25.0 40.0 30.0 5.0 25.0 70.0 73.75
Yeoncheon County (20) 0.0 0.0 25.0 55.0 20.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 73.75
38 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
3) Information related to youth basic income project can be obtained easily
As for the question on whether information related to youth basic income project could be obtained easily, 80.2% responded by saying ‘Yes' (Very so: 38.5% + Mostly so: 41.7%) which was higher than 4.2% who responded by saying ‘Not so’ (Not so much: 3.7% + Not at all: 0.5%).
[Figure 19] Information related to youth basic income [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %] project can be obtained easily
Not so Yes
Not so 4.2% 41.7 38.5
Average Yes 78.53 out Average 80.2% of 100 15.6% points 15.6
3.7 0.5
Not at all Not so mush Average Mostly so Very so
Analysis per characteristics
● As for the response, 'Yes' per respondent characteristics, it was relatively high in female, university students and with higher standard of living.
● As for the response 'Yes' per region of residence, Countypo City was the highest with 89.3% followed by Hanam City (88.4%) and Pyeongtaek City (87.0%).
39 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Table 4-1] Information related to youth basic income project can be obtained easily – Per respondent characteristics [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %] [Average No. of Not at Not so Mostly Very Average [No] [Average] [Quite so] converted cases all much so so to 100 pts]
All (3500) 0.5 3.7 15.6 41.7 38.5 4.2 15.6 80.2 78.53
Male (1221) 0.4 3.4 16.5 40.2 39.4 3.8 16.5 79.6 78.69 Gender Female (2279) 0.5 3.9 15.1 42.4 38.1 4.3 15.1 80.5 78.44
High graduate and below (500) 0.2 4.6 21.0 38.2 36.0 4.8 21.0 74.2 76.30 Educational University student (826) 0.5 3.6 13.7 44.1 38.1 4.1 13.7 82.2 78.93 background University graduate and above (2174) 0.5 3.5 15.1 41.5 39.3 4.0 15.1 80.8 78.89
Single (3414) 0.4 3.7 15.7 41.6 38.7 4.1 15.7 80.2 78.60 Marital Married (79) 2.5 5.1 13.9 46.8 31.6 7.6 13.9 78.5 75.00 status Others (7) 0.0 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 0.0 14.3 85.7 85.71
1-person household (324) 0.3 4.6 13.9 40.1 41.0 4.9 13.9 81.2 79.24
Married household (27) 3.7 11.1 11.1 40.7 33.3 14.8 11.1 74.1 72.22 Household Lives with children (37) 2.7 0.0 16.2 51.4 29.7 2.7 16.2 81.1 76.35 type Lives with parents (2846) 0.4 3.4 15.9 41.5 38.8 3.9 15.9 80.3 78.68
Others (266) 0.4 5.3 15.4 44.0 35.0 5.6 15.4 78.9 76.97
Student (with part-time job) (327) 0.0 2.4 12.2 45.0 40.4 2.4 12.2 85.3 80.81
Student (without part-time job) (438) 0.7 4.6 12.8 45.0 37.0 5.3 12.8 82.0 78.25
Current Unemployed (934) 0.6 3.3 17.5 40.9 37.7 4.0 17.5 78.6 77.92 identity status Soldier (32) 0.0 6.3 28.1 43.8 21.9 6.3 28.1 65.6 70.31
Employed (1607) 0.3 3.9 15.2 40.5 40.1 4.2 15.2 80.6 79.03
Others (162) 1.2 3.7 21.6 41.4 32.1 4.9 21.6 73.5 74.85
Below KRW 1 million (175) 0.6 4.0 21.7 36.6 37.1 4.6 21.7 73.7 76.43
KRW 1~below 2 million (546) 0.5 4.2 19.2 38.6 37.4 4.8 19.2 76.0 77.01
KRW 2~below 3 million (842) 0.5 3.7 14.4 43.5 38.0 4.2 14.4 81.5 78.71 Household KRW 3~below 4 million (450) 0.2 2.9 15.8 42.9 38.2 3.1 15.8 81.1 79.00 income KRW 4~below 5 million (522) 0.6 4.2 14.9 41.6 38.7 4.8 14.9 80.3 78.40
KRW 5~below 6 million (291) 0.7 3.4 15.5 45.4 35.1 4.1 15.5 80.4 77.66
Above KRW 6 million (674) 0.3 3.6 13.2 40.8 42.1 3.9 13.2 82.9 80.23
High (398) 0.0 3.8 13.8 38.9 43.5 3.8 13.8 82.4 80.53 Standard Mid (1476) 0.3 3.5 15.7 43.5 36.9 3.9 15.7 80.4 78.29 of living Low (1626) 0.7 3.9 16.0 40.7 38.8 4.6 16.0 79.5 78.26
40 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
[Table 4-2] Information related to youth basic income project can be obtained easily – Per region of residence [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %] [Average No. of Not at Not so Mostly Very Average [No] [Average] [Quite so] converted cases all much so so to 100 pts]
All (City) (3500) 0.5 3.7 15.6 41.7 38.5 4.2 15.6 80.2 78.53
Suwon (363) 0.0 4.4 12.4 44.1 39.1 4.4 12.4 83.2 79.48
Seongnam (254) 0.8 8.3 18.5 40.9 31.5 9.1 18.5 72.4 73.52
Bucheon (261) 0.4 2.7 18.4 34.5 44.1 3.1 18.4 78.5 79.79
Anyang (185) 1.1 2.2 16.8 38.4 41.6 3.2 16.8 80.0 79.32
Ansan (239) 0.4 3.8 12.1 39.7 43.9 4.2 12.1 83.7 80.75
Yongin (270) 0.0 3.0 15.2 43.3 38.5 3.0 15.2 81.9 79.35
Pyeongtaek (131) 0.0 2.3 10.7 50.4 36.6 2.3 10.7 87.0 80.34
Gwangmyeong (96) 3.1 2.1 10.4 46.9 37.5 5.2 10.4 84.4 78.39
Siheung (144) 0.0 3.5 17.4 38.9 40.3 3.5 17.4 79.2 78.99
Gunpo (84) 1.2 1.2 8.3 46.4 42.9 2.4 8.3 89.3 82.14
Hwaseong (155) 0.0 5.2 20.0 41.9 32.9 5.2 20.0 74.8 75.65
Icheon (39) 0.0 2.6 23.1 41.0 33.3 2.6 23.1 74.4 76.28
Gimpo (85) 0.0 4.7 14.1 41.2 40.0 4.7 14.1 81.2 79.12
Gwangju (86) 1.2 3.5 15.1 40.7 39.5 4.7 15.1 80.2 78.49
Anseong (37) 0.0 2.7 18.9 51.4 27.0 2.7 18.9 78.4 75.68 Region of Hanam (43) 0.0 2.3 9.3 34.9 53.5 2.3 9.3 88.4 84.88 residence Uiwang (46) 2.2 4.3 10.9 50.0 32.6 6.5 10.9 82.6 76.63
Osan (53) 0.0 1.9 17.0 41.5 39.6 1.9 17.0 81.1 79.72
Gwacheon (20) 0.0 0.0 25.0 45.0 30.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 76.25
Yeoju (20) 0.0 0.0 20.0 45.0 35.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 78.75
Yangpyeong County (20) 0.0 5.0 10.0 35.0 50.0 5.0 10.0 85.0 82.50
Goyang (280) 0.4 4.3 14.3 38.6 42.5 4.6 14.3 81.1 79.64
Uijeongbu (130) 0.0 1.5 21.5 37.7 39.2 1.5 21.5 76.9 78.65
Namyangju (160) 0.6 3.1 20.6 43.1 32.5 3.8 20.6 75.6 75.94
Paju (96) 1.0 4.2 15.6 41.7 37.5 5.2 15.6 79.2 77.60
Guri (54) 0.0 1.9 16.7 44.4 37.0 1.9 16.7 81.5 79.17
Pocheon (35) 0.0 5.7 20.0 57.1 17.1 5.7 20.0 74.3 71.43
Yangju (48) 0.0 6.3 18.8 35.4 39.6 6.3 18.8 75.0 77.08
Dongducheon (26) 0.0 3.8 19.2 34.6 42.3 3.8 19.2 76.9 78.85
Gapyeong County (20) 5.0 5.0 5.0 65.0 20.0 10.0 5.0 85.0 72.50
Yeoncheon County (20) 0.0 5.0 10.0 55.0 30.0 5.0 10.0 85.0 77.50
41 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
4) ‘Things to note’ are well informed upon application
As for the question on whether 'Things to note' were well informed upon application, 80.3% responded by saying 'Yes’ (Very so: 340.4% + Mostly so: 39.9%) which was higher than 4.1% who responded by saying 'Not so' (Not so much: 3.7% + Not at all: 0.3%).
[Figure 20] 'Things to note' are well informed upon application [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
Not so Yes Not so 4.1% 39.9 40.4 Average Yes 79.07 out Average 80.3% of 100 15.6% points 15.6
0.3 3.7
Not at all Not so mush Average Mostly so Very so
Analysis per characteristics
● As for the response, 'Yes' per respondent characteristics, it was relatively high in male, university students, who were currently students (with part-time job) and with higher standard of living.
● As for the response 'Yes' per region of residence, Hanam City was the highest with 97.7% followed by Uiwang City (89.1%) and Countypo City (88.1%).
42 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
[Table 5-1] 'Things to note' are well informed upon application – Per respondent characteristics
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %] [Average No. of Not at Not so Mostly Very Average [No] [Average] [Quite so] converted cases all much so so to 100 pts]
All (3500) 0.3 3.7 15.6 39.9 40.4 4.1 15.6 80.3 79.07
Male (1221) 0.4 3.1 15.9 40.0 40.5 3.5 15.9 80.6 79.30 Gender Female (2279) 0.3 4.0 15.5 39.9 40.3 4.3 15.5 80.2 78.95
High graduate and below (500) 0.4 4.0 20.0 38.2 37.4 4.4 20.0 75.6 77.05 Educational University student (826) 0.5 2.9 14.6 42.3 39.7 3.4 14.6 82.0 79.45 background University graduate and above (2174) 0.3 4.0 15.0 39.5 41.3 4.2 15.0 80.8 79.39
Single (3414) 0.4 3.7 15.6 39.9 40.5 4.1 15.6 80.3 79.10 Marital Married (79) 0.0 3.8 16.5 45.6 34.2 3.8 16.5 79.7 77.53 status Others (7) 0.0 0.0 28.6 14.3 57.1 0.0 28.6 71.4 82.14
1-person household (324) 0.6 4.6 14.2 38.0 42.6 5.2 14.2 80.6 79.32
Married household (27) 0.0 3.7 11.1 51.9 33.3 3.7 11.1 85.2 78.70 Household Lives with children (37) 0.0 2.7 18.9 43.2 35.1 2.7 18.9 78.4 77.70 type Lives with parents (2846) 0.3 3.6 15.5 40.1 40.5 3.9 15.5 80.5 79.19
Others (266) 0.4 3.8 18.4 39.5 38.0 4.1 18.4 77.4 77.73
Student (with part-time job) (327) 0.3 1.5 14.7 41.3 42.2 1.8 14.7 83.5 80.89
Student (without part-time job) (438) 0.9 3.0 14.6 41.1 40.4 3.9 14.6 81.5 79.28
Current Unemployed (934) 0.2 4.2 16.5 41.1 38.0 4.4 16.5 79.1 78.13 identity status Soldier (32) 0.0 12.5 15.6 62.5 9.4 12.5 15.6 71.9 67.19
Employed (1607) 0.3 4.1 15.2 38.0 42.4 4.4 15.2 80.3 79.50
Others (162) 0.0 1.9 19.1 42.6 36.4 1.9 19.1 79.0 78.40
Below KRW 1 million (175) 1.1 5.1 21.1 36.6 36.0 6.3 21.1 72.6 75.29
KRW 1~below 2 million (546) 0.4 4.2 18.9 38.8 37.7 4.6 18.9 76.6 77.34
KRW 2~below 3 million (842) 0.2 3.1 14.0 43.7 39.0 3.3 14.0 82.7 79.51 Household KRW 3~below 4 million (450) 0.2 4.2 14.7 41.8 39.1 4.4 14.7 80.9 78.83 income KRW 4~below 5 million (522) 0.4 2.5 17.4 37.5 42.1 2.9 17.4 79.7 79.65
KRW 5~below 6 million (291) 0.3 2.1 15.1 39.5 43.0 2.4 15.1 82.5 80.67
Above KRW 6 million (674) 0.3 5.0 13.1 37.8 43.8 5.3 13.1 81.6 79.93
High (398) 0.5 3.8 13.8 35.4 46.5 4.3 13.8 81.9 80.90 Standard Mid (1476) 0.2 3.9 14.2 41.6 40.2 4.1 14.2 81.8 79.42 of living Low (1626) 0.4 3.6 17.4 39.5 39.1 4.0 17.4 78.6 78.31
43 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Table 5-2] 'Things to note' are well informed upon application – Per region of residence
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %] [Average No. of Not at Not so Mostly Very Average [No] [Average] [Quite so] converted cases all much so so to 100 pts]
All (City) (3500) 0.3 3.7 15.6 39.9 40.4 4.1 15.6 80.3 79.07
Suwon (363) 0.0 3.9 12.1 43.5 40.5 3.9 12.1 84.0 80.17
Seongnam (254) 0.0 7.5 18.9 40.2 33.5 7.5 18.9 73.6 74.90
Bucheon (261) 0.4 3.1 13.8 36.4 46.4 3.4 13.8 82.8 81.32
Anyang (185) 0.5 3.2 15.1 33.5 47.6 3.8 15.1 81.1 81.08
Ansan (239) 0.4 4.2 14.2 39.7 41.4 4.6 14.2 81.2 79.39
Yongin (270) 0.0 2.6 15.6 42.6 39.3 2.6 15.6 81.9 79.63
Pyeongtaek (131) 1.5 4.6 14.5 44.3 35.1 6.1 14.5 79.4 76.72
Gwangmyeong (96) 1.0 3.1 9.4 43.8 42.7 4.2 9.4 86.5 80.99
Siheung (144) 0.0 2.1 20.8 30.6 46.5 2.1 20.8 77.1 80.38
Gunpo (84) 0.0 2.4 9.5 47.6 40.5 2.4 9.5 88.1 81.55
Hwaseong (155) 1.3 5.2 18.7 41.3 33.5 6.5 18.7 74.8 75.16
Icheon (39) 2.6 0.0 25.6 33.3 38.5 2.6 25.6 71.8 76.28
Gimpo (85) 0.0 5.9 15.3 40.0 38.8 5.9 15.3 78.8 77.94
Gwangju (86) 0.0 3.5 15.1 34.9 46.5 3.5 15.1 81.4 81.10
Anseong (37) 0.0 5.4 18.9 37.8 37.8 5.4 18.9 75.7 77.03 Region of Hanam (43) 0.0 0.0 2.3 44.2 53.5 0.0 2.3 97.7 87.79 residence Uiwang (46) 0.0 4.3 6.5 52.2 37.0 4.3 6.5 89.1 80.43
Osan (53) 0.0 1.9 17.0 45.3 35.8 1.9 17.0 81.1 78.77
Gwacheon (20) 0.0 5.0 15.0 45.0 35.0 5.0 15.0 80.0 77.50
Yeoju (20) 0.0 0.0 20.0 35.0 45.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 81.25
Yangpyeong County (20) 0.0 5.0 20.0 35.0 40.0 5.0 20.0 75.0 77.50
Goyang (280) 0.4 2.9 15.4 38.6 42.9 3.2 15.4 81.4 80.18
Uijeongbu (130) 0.0 1.5 20.0 40.8 37.7 1.5 20.0 78.5 78.65
Namyangju (160) 0.0 3.1 20.0 40.0 36.9 3.1 20.0 76.9 77.66
Paju (96) 1.0 4.2 15.6 38.5 40.6 5.2 15.6 79.2 78.39
Guri (54) 1.9 7.4 16.7 35.2 38.9 9.3 16.7 74.1 75.46
Pocheon (35) 0.0 5.7 25.7 40.0 28.6 5.7 25.7 68.6 72.86
Yangju (48) 0.0 4.2 12.5 37.5 45.8 4.2 12.5 83.3 81.25
Dongducheon (26) 0.0 0.0 19.2 42.3 38.5 0.0 19.2 80.8 79.81
Gapyeong County (20) 0.0 10.0 10.0 50.0 30.0 10.0 10.0 80.0 75.00
Yeoncheon County (20) 0.0 0.0 30.0 40.0 30.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 75.00
44 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
2 Application procedure of youth basic income project
The question is about the application procedure of the youth basic income project. Q Please check to what extent you agree with each question.
As for the satisfaction regarding application procedure of youth basic income project, 'The period of application is sufficient’ was the highest with 85.34 points followed by ‘Required documents are simple’ (72.63 points) and ‘Online application procedure is convenient’ (71.17 points) and 'I'm satisfied with having to apply every quarter’ (57.02 points) had relatively low satisfaction.
[Figure 21] Application procedure of youth basic income project [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: Point]
85.34
71.17 72.63 57.02
Online (Jababa job platform) Satisfied with having to Required documents Period of application application procedure apply every quarter (Copy of resident registration) is sufficient is convenient are simple
45 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Table 6-1] Application procedure of youth basic income project – Per respondent characteristics
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: Point]
Online (Jababa Satisfied with Required Period of job platform) having to apply documents application is No. application every quarter (Copy of resident sufficient of cases procedure is registration) are convenient simple
All (3500) 71.17 57.02 72.63 85.34
Male (1221) 71.29 57.96 72.56 84.40 Gender Female (2279) 71.11 56.52 72.66 85.85
High graduate and below (500) 70.25 56.80 72.85 84.25 Educational University student (826) 71.61 57.14 71.22 84.81 background University graduate and above (2174) 71.22 57.03 73.11 85.80
Single (3414) 71.17 56.96 72.57 85.33 Marital Married (79) 71.52 59.49 75.32 85.44 status Others (7) 67.86 60.71 71.43 92.86
1-person household (324) 71.99 55.48 73.23 86.34
Married household (27) 68.52 50.00 72.22 87.96 Household Lives with children (37) 73.65 63.51 74.32 83.11 type Lives with parents (2846) 71.12 57.28 72.56 85.34
Others (266) 70.68 55.92 72.46 84.21
Student (with part-time job) (327) 70.11 55.28 71.02 85.70
Student (without part-time job) (438) 72.32 57.76 71.86 85.16
Current Unemployed (934) 70.34 57.09 72.75 85.44 identity status Soldier (32) 63.28 52.34 62.50 78.91
Employed (1607) 71.83 57.34 73.48 85.58
Others (162) 70.06 55.86 70.83 83.49
Below KRW 1 million (175) 68.14 56.57 71.71 82.29
KRW 1~below 2 million (546) 71.57 58.20 71.89 84.57
KRW 2~below 3 million (842) 71.35 56.83 73.01 85.10 Household KRW 3~below 4 million (450) 71.44 58.22 74.17 85.83 income KRW 4~below 5 million (522) 70.88 57.33 73.71 85.49
KRW 5~below 6 million (291) 69.24 56.10 70.36 84.62
Above KRW 6 million (674) 72.29 55.79 72.11 86.94
High (398) 71.42 54.90 70.29 86.43 Standard Mid (1476) 71.56 58.66 72.70 85.57 of living Low (1626) 70.76 56.06 73.14 84.87
46 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
[Table 6-2] Application procedure of youth basic income project – Per region of residence
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: Point] Online (Jababa Satisfied with Required Period of job platform) having to apply documents application is No. application every quarter (Copy of resident sufficient of cases procedure is registration) are convenient simple
All (City) (3500) 71.17 57.02 72.63 85.34
Suwon (363) 72.59 57.92 74.17 87.12
Seongnam (254) 65.75 55.02 66.63 80.81
Bucheon (261) 73.08 54.98 73.18 85.25
Anyang (185) 68.65 55.00 72.30 87.30
Ansan (239) 71.86 58.89 71.97 85.25
Yongin (270) 72.59 56.57 75.00 85.65
Pyeongtaek (131) 72.14 56.11 71.95 82.82
Gwangmyeong (96) 66.93 57.29 75.52 85.68
Siheung (144) 74.31 62.15 73.26 86.28
Gunpo (84) 72.02 59.82 73.21 85.42
Hwaseong (155) 71.13 54.84 69.35 84.68
Icheon (39) 66.03 46.79 69.87 80.77
Gimpo (85) 71.18 56.18 75.59 84.12
Gwangju (86) 71.80 56.40 73.26 87.21
Anseong (37) 66.22 52.03 72.30 85.81 Region of Hanam (43) 74.42 58.14 75.00 91.28 residence Uiwang (46) 71.20 54.35 72.83 86.96
Osan (53) 69.34 63.21 74.53 88.21
Gwacheon (20) 65.00 55.00 67.50 80.00
Yeoju (20) 68.75 51.25 66.25 82.50
Yangpyeong County (20) 76.25 66.25 80.00 90.00
Goyang (280) 70.54 56.61 73.93 86.25
Uijeongbu (130) 71.73 57.12 75.00 85.00
Namyangju (160) 71.72 60.47 71.72 85.63
Paju (96) 72.40 59.11 74.22 85.42
Guri (54) 70.83 52.31 62.50 86.11
Pocheon (35) 69.29 55.71 73.57 82.14
Yangju (48) 77.60 64.06 72.40 85.94
Dongducheon (26) 76.92 57.69 78.85 84.62
Gapyeong County (20) 70.00 53.75 72.50 85.00
Yeoncheon County (20) 68.75 57.50 70.00 78.75
47 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
1) Online application procedure is convenient
As for the question on whether application procedure was convenient, 57.02 responded by saying ‘Yes’ (Very so: 29.0% + Mostly so: 37.8%) which was higher than 9.8% who responded by saying ‘Not so’ (Not so much: 8.3% + Not at all: 1.4%).
[Figure 22] Online application procedure is convenient [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
Not so Yes
Not so 9.8% 37.8 Average 29.0 Yes 71.17 out 23.4 66.9% of 100 Average points 23.4% 8.3 1.4
Not at all Not so mush Average Mostly so Very so
Analysis per characteristics
● As for the response, 'Yes' per respondent characteristics, it was relatively high in female, university students, who were students (without part-time job) and with higher standard of living.
48 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
[Table 7-1] Online application procedure is convenient – Per respondent characteristics
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %] [Average No. of Not at Not so Mostly Very Average [No] [Average] [Quite so] converted cases all much so so to 100 pts]
All (3500) 1.4 8.3 23.4 37.8 29.0 9.8 23.4 66.9 71.17
Male (1221) 2.1 7.0 24.6 36.0 30.2 9.2 24.6 66.3 71.29 Gender Female (2279) 1.1 9.0 22.7 38.8 28.4 10.1 22.7 67.2 71.11
High graduate and below (500) 1.2 8.4 28.0 33.0 29.4 9.6 28.0 62.4 70.25 Educational University student (826) 1.6 7.0 23.4 39.5 28.6 8.6 23.4 68.0 71.61 background University graduate and above (2174) 1.4 8.8 22.3 38.3 29.1 10.3 22.3 67.4 71.22
Single (3414) 1.4 8.4 23.3 37.8 29.1 9.8 23.3 66.9 71.17 Marital Married (79) 1.3 5.1 26.6 40.5 26.6 6.3 26.6 67.1 71.52 status Others (7) 0.0 28.6 14.3 14.3 42.9 28.6 14.3 57.1 67.86
1-person household (324) 2.8 7.7 21.3 35.2 33.0 10.5 21.3 68.2 71.99
Married household (27) 3.7 7.4 25.9 37.0 25.9 11.1 25.9 63.0 68.52 Household Lives with children (37) 0.0 2.7 27.0 43.2 27.0 2.7 27.0 70.3 73.65 type Lives with parents (2846) 1.3 8.5 23.4 38.1 28.7 9.8 23.4 66.8 71.12
Others (266) 1.5 7.9 25.2 37.2 28.2 9.4 25.2 65.4 70.68
Student (with part-time job) (327) 1.5 9.2 25.1 35.8 28.4 10.7 25.1 64.2 70.11
Student (without part-time job) (438) 1.4 7.1 22.1 39.7 29.7 8.4 22.1 69.4 72.32
Current Unemployed (934) 1.8 7.9 24.9 37.7 27.6 9.7 24.9 65.3 70.34 identity status Soldier (32) 3.1 3.1 40.6 43.8 9.4 6.3 40.6 53.1 63.28
Employed (1607) 1.1 9.0 21.9 37.3 30.6 10.1 21.9 68.0 71.83
Others (162) 1.9 6.8 25.3 41.4 24.7 8.6 25.3 66.0 70.06
Below KRW 1 million (175) 1.7 10.3 29.7 30.3 28.0 12.0 29.7 58.3 68.14
KRW 1~below 2 million (546) 1.1 8.4 24.0 36.1 30.4 9.5 24.0 66.5 71.57
KRW 2~below 3 million (842) 1.3 7.8 24.2 37.4 29.2 9.1 24.2 66.6 71.35 Household KRW 3~below 4 million (450) 0.4 8.4 22.9 41.3 26.9 8.9 22.9 68.2 71.44 income KRW 4~below 5 million (522) 2.1 7.9 22.2 40.0 27.8 10.0 22.2 67.8 70.88
KRW 5~below 6 million (291) 3.1 8.6 23.7 37.5 27.1 11.7 23.7 64.6 69.24
Above KRW 6 million (674) 1.2 8.6 21.2 37.8 31.2 9.8 21.2 69.0 72.29
High (398) 1.8 10.1 19.6 37.9 30.7 11.8 19.6 68.6 71.42 Standard Mid (1476) 1.2 7.6 24.1 38.3 28.9 8.7 24.1 67.2 71.56 of living Low (1626) 1.6 8.6 23.7 37.4 28.7 10.2 23.7 66.1 70.76
49 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Table 7-2] Online application procedure is convenient – Per region of residence
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
[Average No. of Not at Not so Mostly Very Average [No] [Average] [Quite so] converted cases all much so so to 100 pts]
All (City) (3500) 1.4 8.3 23.4 37.8 29.0 9.8 23.4 66.9 71.17
Suwon (363) 1.4 6.6 22.0 40.2 29.8 8.0 22.0 70.0 72.59
Seongnam (254) 2.4 14.6 24.0 35.8 23.2 16.9 24.0 59.1 65.75
Bucheon (261) 0.4 8.4 20.7 39.5 31.0 8.8 20.7 70.5 73.08
Anyang (185) 0.5 14.1 23.8 33.5 28.1 14.6 23.8 61.6 68.65
Ansan (239) 2.9 5.9 22.6 38.1 30.5 8.8 22.6 68.6 71.86
Yongin (270) 0.0 7.8 23.0 40.4 28.9 7.8 23.0 69.3 72.59
Pyeongtaek (131) 0.8 5.3 26.0 40.5 27.5 6.1 26.0 67.9 72.14
Gwangmyeong (96) 2.1 12.5 24.0 38.5 22.9 14.6 24.0 61.5 66.93
Siheung (144) 1.4 5.6 22.9 34.7 35.4 6.9 22.9 70.1 74.31
Gunpo (84) 1.2 7.1 20.2 45.2 26.2 8.3 20.2 71.4 72.02
Hwaseong (155) 1.3 8.4 25.2 34.8 30.3 9.7 25.2 65.2 71.13
Icheon (39) 2.6 10.3 30.8 33.3 23.1 12.8 30.8 56.4 66.03
Gimpo (85) 1.2 9.4 16.5 49.4 23.5 10.6 16.5 72.9 71.18
Gwangju (86) 1.2 8.1 26.7 30.2 33.7 9.3 26.7 64.0 71.80
Anseong (37) 2.7 5.4 32.4 43.2 16.2 8.1 32.4 59.5 66.22 Region of Hanam (43) 2.3 9.3 18.6 27.9 41.9 11.6 18.6 69.8 74.42 residence Uiwang (46) 0.0 10.9 23.9 34.8 30.4 10.9 23.9 65.2 71.20
Osan (53) 1.9 7.5 18.9 54.7 17.0 9.4 18.9 71.7 69.34
Gwacheon (20) 5.0 10.0 35.0 20.0 30.0 15.0 35.0 50.0 65.00
Yeoju (20) 0.0 5.0 30.0 50.0 15.0 5.0 30.0 65.0 68.75
Yangpyeong County (20) 0.0 5.0 20.0 40.0 35.0 5.0 20.0 75.0 76.25
Goyang (280) 1.4 7.5 26.4 36.8 27.9 8.9 26.4 64.6 70.54
Uijeongbu (130) 2.3 6.9 24.6 33.8 32.3 9.2 24.6 66.2 71.73
Namyangju (160) 0.6 10.0 22.5 35.6 31.3 10.6 22.5 66.9 71.72
Paju (96) 3.1 7.3 18.8 38.5 32.3 10.4 18.8 70.8 72.40
Guri (54) 1.9 3.7 35.2 27.8 31.5 5.6 35.2 59.3 70.83
Pocheon (35) 0.0 11.4 20.0 48.6 20.0 11.4 20.0 68.6 69.29
Yangju (48) 0.0 6.3 14.6 41.7 37.5 6.3 14.6 79.2 77.60
Dongducheon (26) 0.0 0.0 34.6 23.1 42.3 0.0 34.6 65.4 76.92
Gapyeong County (20) 10.0 5.0 10.0 45.0 30.0 15.0 10.0 75.0 70.00
Yeoncheon County (20) 5.0 5.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 10.0 30.0 60.0 68.75
50 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
2) Satisfied about having to apply every quarter
As for the question on whether respondents were satisfied about having to apply every quarter, 46.7% responded by saying ‘Yes’ (Very so: 19.8% + Mostly so: 26.9%) which was higher than 29.7% who responded by saying ‘Not so’ (Not so much: 21.0% + Not at all: 8.7%) but was relatively low in satisfaction.
[Figure 23] Satisfied about having to apply every quarter [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
Not so Yes
Not so Average Yes 29.7% 26.9 46.7% 57.02 out 21.0 23.5 of 100 19.8 points
Average 8.7 23.5%
Not at all Not so mush Average Mostly so Very so
Analysis per characteristics
● As for the response, 'Yes' per respondent characteristics, it was relatively high in male, university students, who were currently students (without part-time job) and with household income of KRW 4 million ~ below KRW 5 million.
51 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Table 8-1] Satisfied about having to apply every quarter – Per respondent characteristics
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %] [Average No. of Not at Not so Mostly Very Average [No] [Average] [Quite so] converted cases all much so so to 100 pts]
All (3500) 8.7 21.0 23.5 26.9 19.8 29.7 23.5 46.7 57.02
Male (1221) 10.2 19.1 21.2 27.8 21.7 29.2 21.2 49.5 57.96 Gender Female (2279) 7.9 22.1 24.8 26.4 18.8 30.0 24.8 45.2 56.52
High graduate and below (500) 9.0 20.2 27.6 21.0 22.2 29.2 27.6 43.2 56.80 Educational University student (826) 9.7 21.3 19.7 29.3 20.0 31.0 19.7 49.3 57.14 background University graduate and above (2174) 8.3 21.1 24.1 27.3 19.2 29.4 24.1 46.6 57.03
Single (3414) 8.6 21.2 23.5 27.0 19.7 29.8 23.5 46.7 56.96 Marital Married (79) 10.1 15.2 27.8 20.3 26.6 25.3 27.8 46.8 59.49 status Others (7) 28.6 0.0 0.0 42.9 28.6 28.6 0.0 71.4 60.71
1-person household (324) 12.7 22.2 17.9 25.0 22.2 34.9 17.9 47.2 55.48
Married household (27) 25.9 14.8 18.5 14.8 25.9 40.7 18.5 40.7 50.00 Household Lives with children (37) 2.7 16.2 29.7 27.0 24.3 18.9 29.7 51.4 63.51 type Lives with parents (2846) 8.3 20.8 24.2 27.1 19.7 29.1 24.2 46.8 57.28
Others (266) 7.9 23.3 23.3 28.2 17.3 31.2 23.3 45.5 55.92
Student (with part-time job) (327) 9.8 24.2 22.9 21.4 21.7 33.9 22.9 43.1 55.28
Student (without part-time job) (438) 10.0 19.9 20.8 27.6 21.7 29.9 20.8 49.3 57.76
Current Unemployed (934) 7.0 22.5 25.3 25.8 19.5 29.4 25.3 45.3 57.09 identity status Soldier (32) 6.3 31.3 18.8 34.4 9.4 37.5 18.8 43.8 52.34
Employed (1607) 9.1 19.9 23.0 28.4 19.6 29.1 23.0 48.0 57.34
Others (162) 9.3 18.5 29.0 25.9 17.3 27.8 29.0 43.2 55.86
Below KRW 1 million (175) 9.7 20.6 27.4 18.3 24.0 30.3 27.4 42.3 56.57
KRW 1~below 2 million (546) 8.2 18.5 26.7 25.3 21.2 26.7 26.7 46.5 58.20
KRW 2~below 3 million (842) 9.4 20.2 24.1 26.4 20.0 29.6 24.1 46.3 56.83 Household KRW 3~below 4 million (450) 6.4 22.2 23.8 27.1 20.4 28.7 23.8 47.6 58.22 income KRW 4~below 5 million (522) 7.1 22.6 22.2 30.1 18.0 29.7 22.2 48.1 57.33
KRW 5~below 6 million (291) 7.9 22.0 24.4 29.2 16.5 29.9 24.4 45.7 56.10
Above KRW 6 million (674) 11.1 21.8 19.7 27.4 19.9 32.9 19.7 47.3 55.79
High (398) 13.8 19.1 20.6 26.6 19.8 32.9 20.6 46.5 54.90 Standard Mid (1476) 6.6 20.4 24.3 29.0 19.6 27.0 24.3 48.6 58.66 of living Low (1626) 9.3 22.1 23.6 25.0 20.0 31.4 23.6 45.0 56.06
52 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
[Table 8-2] Satisfied about having to apply every quarter – Per region of residence
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %] [Average No. of Not at Not so Mostly Very Average [No] [Average] [Quite so] converted cases all much so so to 100 pts]
All (City) (3500) 8.7 21.0 23.5 26.9 19.8 29.7 23.5 46.7 57.02
Suwon (363) 7.4 21.5 21.5 31.1 18.5 28.9 21.5 49.6 57.92
Seongnam (254) 9.8 21.7 24.0 27.6 16.9 31.5 24.0 44.5 55.02
Bucheon (261) 7.3 24.5 26.4 24.5 17.2 31.8 26.4 41.8 54.98
Anyang (185) 10.8 21.1 26.5 20.5 21.1 31.9 26.5 41.6 55.00
Ansan (239) 7.9 19.7 23.4 26.8 22.2 27.6 23.4 49.0 58.89
Yongin (270) 7.4 20.4 27.8 27.4 17.0 27.8 27.8 44.4 56.57
Pyeongtaek (131) 13.7 12.2 26.7 30.5 16.8 26.0 26.7 47.3 56.11
Gwangmyeong (96) 11.5 18.8 20.8 27.1 21.9 30.2 20.8 49.0 57.29
Siheung (144) 4.9 20.8 21.5 26.4 26.4 25.7 21.5 52.8 62.15
Gunpo (84) 2.4 27.4 19.0 31.0 20.2 29.8 19.0 51.2 59.82
Hwaseong (155) 7.7 25.8 22.6 27.1 16.8 33.5 22.6 43.9 54.84
Icheon (39) 17.9 23.1 23.1 25.6 10.3 41.0 23.1 35.9 46.79
Gimpo (85) 8.2 16.5 31.8 29.4 14.1 24.7 31.8 43.5 56.18
Gwangju (86) 8.1 24.4 19.8 29.1 18.6 32.6 19.8 47.7 56.40
Anseong (37) 8.1 29.7 27.0 16.2 18.9 37.8 27.0 35.1 52.03 Region of Hanam (43) 11.6 23.3 14.0 23.3 27.9 34.9 14.0 51.2 58.14 residence Uiwang (46) 10.9 19.6 30.4 19.6 19.6 30.4 30.4 39.1 54.35
Osan (53) 5.7 20.8 13.2 35.8 24.5 26.4 13.2 60.4 63.21
Gwacheon (20) 10.0 20.0 30.0 20.0 20.0 30.0 30.0 40.0 55.00
Yeoju (20) 5.0 35.0 20.0 30.0 10.0 40.0 20.0 40.0 51.25
Yangpyeong County (20) 10.0 15.0 10.0 30.0 35.0 25.0 10.0 65.0 66.25
Goyang (280) 12.1 19.3 19.6 27.9 21.1 31.4 19.6 48.9 56.61
Uijeongbu (130) 10.0 20.0 23.1 25.4 21.5 30.0 23.1 46.9 57.12
Namyangju (160) 8.1 17.5 25.6 21.9 26.9 25.6 25.6 48.8 60.47
Paju (96) 7.3 17.7 25.0 31.3 18.8 25.0 25.0 50.0 59.11
Guri (54) 13.0 25.9 18.5 24.1 18.5 38.9 18.5 42.6 52.31
Pocheon (35) 8.6 22.9 17.1 40.0 11.4 31.4 17.1 51.4 55.71
Yangju (48) 2.1 16.7 29.2 27.1 25.0 18.8 29.2 52.1 64.06
Dongducheon (26) 3.8 34.6 19.2 11.5 30.8 38.5 19.2 42.3 57.69
Gapyeong County (20) 10.0 20.0 30.0 25.0 15.0 30.0 30.0 40.0 53.75
Yeoncheon County (20) 10.0 20.0 30.0 10.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 40.0 57.50
53 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
3) Required documents are simple
As for the question on whether required documents were simple, 69.1% responded by saying ‘Yes’ (Very so: 33.5% + Mostly so: 35.7%) which was higher than 9.7% who responded by saying ‘Not so’ (Not so much: 7.3% + Not at all: 2.4%).
[Figure 24] Required documents are simple [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
Not so Yes
35.7 33.5 Not so 9.7% Average Yes 72.63 out 21.2 69.1% of 100 Average points 21.2% 7.3 2.4
Not at all Not so mush Average Mostly so Very so
Analysis per characteristics
● As for the response, 'Yes' per respondent characteristics, it was relatively high in female, with higher educational level, who were currently employed and with household income of KRW 4 ~ below 5 million.
54 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
[Table 9-1] Required documents are simple – Per respondent characteristics [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
[Average No. of Not at Not so Mostly Very Average [No] [Average] [Quite so] converted cases all much so so to 100 pts]
All (3500) 2.4 7.3 21.2 35.7 33.5 9.7 21.2 69.1 72.63
Male (1221) 3.0 6.6 21.6 34.5 34.2 9.7 21.6 68.7 72.56 Gender Female (2279) 2.1 7.6 21.0 36.3 33.0 9.7 21.0 69.3 72.66
High graduate and below (500) 1.8 6.8 25.2 30.6 35.6 8.6 25.2 66.2 72.85 Educational University student (826) 3.6 8.2 20.5 35.0 32.7 11.9 20.5 67.7 71.22 background University graduate and above (2174) 2.1 7.0 20.6 37.1 33.3 9.1 20.6 70.3 73.11
Single (3414) 2.4 7.3 21.2 35.8 33.3 9.7 21.2 69.1 72.57 Marital Married (79) 3.8 3.8 20.3 31.6 40.5 7.6 20.3 72.2 75.32 status Others (7) 0.0 14.3 28.6 14.3 42.9 14.3 28.6 57.1 71.43
1-person household (324) 3.1 10.2 17.3 29.6 39.8 13.3 17.3 69.4 73.23
Married household (27) 7.4 7.4 18.5 22.2 44.4 14.8 18.5 66.7 72.22 Household Lives with children (37) 2.7 2.7 21.6 40.5 32.4 5.4 21.6 73.0 74.32 type Lives with parents (2846) 2.3 6.9 21.7 36.6 32.5 9.2 21.7 69.1 72.56
Others (266) 2.3 8.3 21.4 33.5 34.6 10.5 21.4 68.0 72.46
Student (with part-time job) (327) 4.9 8.3 18.7 34.3 33.9 13.1 18.7 68.2 71.02
Student (without part-time job) (438) 2.3 9.4 21.0 33.3 34.0 11.6 21.0 67.4 71.86
Current Unemployed (934) 1.4 6.6 23.3 36.8 31.8 8.0 23.3 68.6 72.75 identity status Soldier (32) 6.3 6.3 31.3 43.8 12.5 12.5 31.3 56.3 62.50
Employed (1607) 2.5 6.7 20.0 36.0 34.8 9.2 20.0 70.8 73.48
Others (162) 1.9 8.6 25.3 32.7 31.5 10.5 25.3 64.2 70.83
Below KRW 1 million (175) 2.9 8.0 24.6 28.6 36.0 10.9 24.6 64.6 71.71
KRW 1~below 2 million (546) 3.1 7.1 22.9 32.8 34.1 10.3 22.9 66.8 71.89
KRW 2~below 3 million (842) 2.3 6.4 22.7 34.3 34.3 8.7 22.7 68.6 73.01 Household KRW 3~below 4 million (450) 0.9 6.9 21.3 36.4 34.4 7.8 21.3 70.9 74.17 income KRW 4~below 5 million (522) 1.3 6.7 20.3 39.1 32.6 8.0 20.3 71.6 73.71
KRW 5~below 6 million (291) 4.1 7.2 18.2 44.0 26.5 11.3 18.2 70.4 70.36
Above KRW 6 million (674) 3.0 8.9 19.1 34.7 34.3 11.9 19.1 69.0 72.11
High (398) 4.5 10.1 18.6 33.4 33.4 14.6 18.6 66.8 70.29 Standard Mid (1476) 1.7 7.4 21.3 37.6 32.0 9.1 21.3 69.6 72.70 of living Low (1626) 2.5 6.5 21.8 34.4 34.8 9.0 21.8 69.2 73.14
55 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Table 9-2] Required documents are simple – Per place of residence [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
[Average No. of Not at Not so Mostly Very Average [No] [Average] [Quite so] converted cases all much so so to 100 pts]
All (City) (3500) 2.4 7.3 21.2 35.7 33.5 9.7 21.2 69.1 72.63
Suwon (363) 2.5 6.1 17.6 39.9 33.9 8.5 17.6 73.8 74.17
Seongnam (254) 3.9 10.2 26.0 35.0 24.8 14.2 26.0 59.8 66.63
Bucheon (261) 1.9 6.1 22.6 36.0 33.3 8.0 22.6 69.3 73.18
Anyang (185) 1.1 10.8 20.5 33.0 34.6 11.9 20.5 67.6 72.30
Ansan (239) 3.3 5.4 23.4 35.6 32.2 8.8 23.4 67.8 71.97
Yongin (270) 1.5 5.6 19.6 38.1 35.2 7.0 19.6 73.3 75.00
Pyeongtaek (131) 2.3 8.4 21.4 35.1 32.8 10.7 21.4 67.9 71.95
Gwangmyeong (96) 1.0 8.3 15.6 37.5 37.5 9.4 15.6 75.0 75.52
Siheung (144) 2.8 6.9 23.6 27.8 38.9 9.7 23.6 66.7 73.26
Gunpo (84) 2.4 8.3 20.2 32.1 36.9 10.7 20.2 69.0 73.21
Hwaseong (155) 2.6 8.4 27.1 32.9 29.0 11.0 27.1 61.9 69.35
Icheon (39) 0.0 12.8 15.4 51.3 20.5 12.8 15.4 71.8 69.87
Gimpo (85) 1.2 5.9 16.5 42.4 34.1 7.1 16.5 76.5 75.59
Gwangju (86) 1.2 4.7 26.7 34.9 32.6 5.8 26.7 67.4 73.26
Anseong (37) 0.0 0.0 29.7 51.4 18.9 0.0 29.7 70.3 72.30 Region of Hanam (43) 4.7 4.7 18.6 30.2 41.9 9.3 18.6 72.1 75.00 residence Uiwang (46) 2.2 10.9 17.4 32.6 37.0 13.0 17.4 69.6 72.83
Osan (53) 0.0 7.5 24.5 30.2 37.7 7.5 24.5 67.9 74.53
Gwacheon (20) 15.0 5.0 15.0 25.0 40.0 20.0 15.0 65.0 67.50
Yeoju (20) 5.0 15.0 10.0 50.0 20.0 20.0 10.0 70.0 66.25
Yangpyeong County (20) 5.0 5.0 10.0 25.0 55.0 10.0 10.0 80.0 80.00
Goyang (280) 2.5 6.8 18.9 36.1 35.7 9.3 18.9 71.8 73.93
Uijeongbu (130) 1.5 5.4 20.0 37.7 35.4 6.9 20.0 73.1 75.00
Namyangju (160) 1.3 10.0 24.4 29.4 35.0 11.3 24.4 64.4 71.72
Paju (96) 4.2 3.1 21.9 33.3 37.5 7.3 21.9 70.8 74.22
Guri (54) 3.7 22.2 18.5 31.5 24.1 25.9 18.5 55.6 62.50
Pocheon (35) 2.9 0.0 20.0 54.3 22.9 2.9 20.0 77.1 73.57
Yangju (48) 4.2 8.3 18.8 31.3 37.5 12.5 18.8 68.8 72.40
Dongducheon (26) 0.0 3.8 23.1 26.9 46.2 3.8 23.1 73.1 78.85
Gapyeong County (20) 5.0 5.0 20.0 35.0 35.0 10.0 20.0 70.0 72.50
Yeoncheon County (20) 5.0 0.0 30.0 40.0 25.0 5.0 30.0 65.0 70.00
56 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
4) The period of application is sufficient
As for the question on whether the period of application was sufficient, 89.7% responded by saying ‘Yes’ (Very so: 52.7% + Mostly so: 36.9%) which was higher than 0.8% who responded by saying ‘Not so’ (Not so much: 0.6% + Not at all: 0.2%).
[Figure 25] The period of application is sufficient [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
Not so Yes
52.7 Not so 0.8% Average 36.9 Average 85.34 out Yes 9.5% 89.7% of 100 points
9.5 0.2 0.6
Not at all Not so mush Average Mostly so Very so
Analysis per characteristics
● As for the response, 'Yes' per respondent characteristics, it was relatively high in female, with higher educational level, who were currently students (with part-time job) and with higher standard of living.
57 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Table 10-1] The period of application is sufficient – Per respondent characteristics [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
[Average No. of Not at Not so Mostly Very Average [No] [Average] [Quite so] converted cases all much so so to 100 pts]
All (3500) 0.2 0.6 9.5 36.9 52.7 0.8 9.5 89.7 85.34
Male (1221) 0.3 0.9 11.3 35.8 51.7 1.2 11.3 87.5 84.40 Gender Female (2279) 0.2 0.4 8.6 37.5 53.3 0.6 8.6 90.8 85.85
High graduate and below (500) 0.0 0.8 13.8 33.0 52.4 0.8 13.8 85.4 84.25 Educational University student (826) 0.5 0.5 8.7 40.0 50.4 1.0 8.7 90.3 84.81 background University graduate and above (2174) 0.2 0.6 8.9 36.7 53.7 0.7 8.9 90.4 85.80
Single (3414) 0.2 0.6 9.5 37.0 52.7 0.8 9.5 89.7 85.33 Marital Married (79) 0.0 0.0 11.4 35.4 53.2 0.0 11.4 88.6 85.44 status Others (7) 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 0.0 0.0 100.0 92.86
1-person household (324) 0.6 0.9 7.4 34.6 56.5 1.5 7.4 91.0 86.34
Married household (27) 0.0 0.0 7.4 33.3 59.3 0.0 7.4 92.6 87.96 Household Lives with children (37) 0.0 0.0 13.5 40.5 45.9 0.0 13.5 86.5 83.11 type Lives with parents (2846) 0.2 0.5 9.8 36.8 52.7 0.7 9.8 89.5 85.34
Others (266) 0.4 0.8 9.4 40.6 48.9 1.1 9.4 89.5 84.21
Student (with part-time job) (327) 0.9 0.6 6.7 38.2 53.5 1.5 6.7 91.7 85.70
Student (without part-time job) (438) 0.0 0.7 8.7 40.0 50.7 0.7 8.7 90.6 85.16
Current Unemployed (934) 0.1 0.9 9.2 36.8 53.0 1.0 9.2 89.8 85.44 identity status Soldier (32) 0.0 0.0 12.5 59.4 28.1 0.0 12.5 87.5 78.91
Employed (1607) 0.2 0.4 10.1 35.2 54.0 0.7 10.1 89.2 85.58
Others (162) 0.0 0.0 13.6 38.9 47.5 0.0 13.6 86.4 83.49
Below KRW 1 million (175) 1.1 1.7 14.3 32.6 50.3 2.9 14.3 82.9 82.29
KRW 1~below 2 million (546) 0.2 0.4 12.5 35.0 52.0 0.5 12.5 87.0 84.57
KRW 2~below 3 million (842) 0.4 0.6 10.1 36.2 52.7 1.0 10.1 89.0 85.10 Household KRW 3~below 4 million (450) 0.0 0.4 7.6 40.2 51.8 0.4 7.6 92.0 85.83 income KRW 4~below 5 million (522) 0.0 0.4 8.8 39.3 51.5 0.4 8.8 90.8 85.49
KRW 5~below 6 million (291) 0.3 0.3 11.0 37.1 51.2 0.7 11.0 88.3 84.62
Above KRW 6 million (674) 0.1 0.7 6.5 36.4 56.2 0.9 6.5 92.6 86.94
High (398) 0.3 1.5 7.5 33.7 57.0 1.8 7.5 90.7 86.43 Standard Mid (1476) 0.1 0.3 9.3 37.9 52.4 0.3 9.3 90.3 85.57 of living Low (1626) 0.4 0.6 10.2 36.8 52.0 1.0 10.2 88.8 84.87
58 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
[Table 10-2] The period of application is sufficient – Per region of residence [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
[Average No. of Not at Not so Mostly Very Average [No] [Average] [Quite so] converted cases all much so so to 100 pts]
All (City) (3500) 0.2 0.6 9.5 36.9 52.7 0.8 9.5 89.7 85.34
Suwon (363) 0.3 0.0 7.2 36.1 56.5 0.3 7.2 92.6 87.12
Seongnam (254) 0.8 1.6 15.4 38.2 44.1 2.4 15.4 82.3 80.81
Bucheon (261) 0.4 0.4 10.3 35.6 53.3 0.8 10.3 88.9 85.25
Anyang (185) 0.0 0.5 8.6 31.9 58.9 0.5 8.6 90.8 87.30
Ansan (239) 0.0 0.8 8.4 39.7 51.0 0.8 8.4 90.8 85.25
Yongin (270) 0.0 0.7 8.1 38.9 52.2 0.7 8.1 91.1 85.65
Pyeongtaek (131) 0.8 1.5 10.7 39.7 47.3 2.3 10.7 87.0 82.82
Gwangmyeong (96) 0.0 1.0 6.3 41.7 51.0 1.0 6.3 92.7 85.68
Siheung (144) 0.0 0.7 12.5 27.8 59.0 0.7 12.5 86.8 86.28
Gunpo (84) 0.0 1.2 4.8 45.2 48.8 1.2 4.8 94.0 85.42
Hwaseong (155) 0.0 0.0 12.9 35.5 51.6 0.0 12.9 87.1 84.68
Icheon (39) 0.0 0.0 17.9 41.0 41.0 0.0 17.9 82.1 80.77
Gimpo (85) 0.0 1.2 7.1 45.9 45.9 1.2 7.1 91.8 84.12
Gwangju (86) 0.0 0.0 9.3 32.6 58.1 0.0 9.3 90.7 87.21
Anseong (37) 0.0 0.0 10.8 35.1 54.1 0.0 10.8 89.2 85.81 Region of Hanam (43) 0.0 0.0 4.7 25.6 69.8 0.0 4.7 95.3 91.28 residence Uiwang (46) 0.0 0.0 8.7 34.8 56.5 0.0 8.7 91.3 86.96
Osan (53) 0.0 0.0 5.7 35.8 58.5 0.0 5.7 94.3 88.21
Gwacheon (20) 0.0 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 80.00
Yeoju (20) 0.0 0.0 15.0 40.0 45.0 0.0 15.0 85.0 82.50
Yangpyeong County (20) 0.0 0.0 10.0 20.0 70.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 90.00
Goyang (280) 0.0 0.4 7.1 39.6 52.9 0.4 7.1 92.5 86.25
Uijeongbu (130) 0.0 0.8 8.5 40.8 50.0 0.8 8.5 90.8 85.00
Namyangju (160) 0.6 0.0 8.8 37.5 53.1 0.6 8.8 90.6 85.63
Paju (96) 0.0 1.0 14.6 26.0 58.3 1.0 14.6 84.4 85.42
Guri (54) 0.0 1.9 7.4 35.2 55.6 1.9 7.4 90.7 86.11
Pocheon (35) 2.9 0.0 8.6 42.9 45.7 2.9 8.6 88.6 82.14
Yangju (48) 2.1 0.0 8.3 31.3 58.3 2.1 8.3 89.6 85.94
Dongducheon (26) 0.0 0.0 15.4 30.8 53.8 0.0 15.4 84.6 84.62
Gapyeong County (20) 0.0 0.0 5.0 50.0 45.0 0.0 5.0 95.0 85.00
Yeoncheon County (20) 0.0 0.0 20.0 45.0 35.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 78.75
59 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
3 Payment amount and method of youth basic income project
The question is about the payment amount and method of the youth basic income project. Q Please check to what extent you agree with each question.
As for the satisfaction regarding payment amount and method of the youth basic income project, ‘Gyeonggi local currency is well delivered and paid' was the highest with 83.32 points followed by ‘Fully understand the initiative for receiving Gyeonggi local currency’ (83.21 points) and 'There is no inconvenience in using Gyeonggi local currency' (70.25 points).
[Figure 26] Payment amount and method of youth basic income project [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: Point]
83.32 83.21
70.25 66.56
Satisfied with the payment Gyeonggi local currency note Fully understand the initiative There is no inconvenience amount of youth basic income (paper), card, mobile) is for receiving Gyeonggi in using Gyeonggi well delivered·paid local currency local currency
60 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
[Table 11-1] Payment amount and method of youth basic income project – Per respondent characteristics [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: Point]
Satisfied with Gyeonggi local Fully understand There is no No. the payment currency note the initiative for inconvenience in of cases amount of youth (paper), card, mobile receiving Gyeonggi using Gyeonggi basic income is well delivered·paid local currency local currency
All (3500) 66.56 83.32 83.21 70.25
Male (1221) 66.83 83.78 82.90 71.50 Gender Female (2279) 66.42 83.07 83.37 69.58
High graduate and below (500) 62.25 82.80 82.90 69.40 Educational University student (826) 66.37 83.11 83.14 69.37 background University graduate and above (2174) 67.63 83.52 83.30 70.78
Single (3414) 66.62 83.22 83.15 70.14 Marital Married (79) 63.29 86.39 84.18 74.05 status Others (7) 75.00 96.43 100.00 82.14
1-person household (324) 66.28 83.18 83.64 67.36
Married household (27) 65.74 90.74 87.04 70.37 Household Lives with children (37) 63.51 83.78 85.14 75.00 type Lives with parents (2846) 66.58 83.25 83.27 70.53
Others (266) 67.20 83.46 81.30 70.11
Student (with part-time job) (327) 65.21 84.02 83.94 70.41
Student (without part-time job) (438) 67.75 84.36 83.50 70.49
Current Unemployed (934) 65.71 83.06 82.68 69.89 identity status Soldier (32) 64.84 82.03 79.69 63.28
Employed (1607) 67.44 83.18 83.37 70.35
Others (162) 62.65 82.25 83.02 71.76
Below KRW 1 million (175) 61.71 82.00 79.00 66.00
KRW 1~below 2 million (546) 64.15 82.01 83.47 69.96
KRW 2~below 3 million (842) 66.24 82.87 84.47 70.40 Household KRW 3~below 4 million (450) 67.33 83.67 84.06 70.61 income KRW 4~below 5 million (522) 66.76 83.76 83.19 70.74
KRW 5~below 6 million (291) 66.49 83.16 81.01 69.50
Above KRW 6 million (674) 69.55 84.79 82.90 71.11
High (398) 71.61 85.74 81.97 72.61 Standard Mid (1476) 68.43 83.47 82.88 70.93 of living Low (1626) 63.64 82.60 83.81 69.05
61 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Table 11-2] Payment amount and method of youth basic income project – Per region of residence [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: Point]
Satisfied with Gyeonggi local Fully understand There is no No. the payment currency (note, the initiative for inconvenience in of cases amount of youth card, mobile) is well receiving Gyeonggi using Gyeonggi basic income delivered·paid local currency local currency
All (City) (3500) 66.56 83.32 83.21 70.25
Suwon (363) 67.63 85.40 83.47 67.15
Seongnam (254) 68.11 80.61 79.33 67.81
Bucheon (261) 67.05 83.81 82.85 71.46
Anyang (185) 65.68 86.62 84.32 67.70
Ansan (239) 66.42 86.51 86.72 80.54
Yongin (270) 66.11 83.70 83.15 69.17
Pyeongtaek (131) 62.98 81.11 82.82 66.60
Gwangmyeong (96) 61.72 83.85 80.21 66.93
Siheung (144) 71.70 86.81 84.55 66.49
Gunpo (84) 70.83 83.33 86.01 77.08
Hwaseong (155) 65.48 77.58 80.65 68.06
Icheon (39) 61.54 85.26 82.69 67.31
Gimpo (85) 67.35 84.71 83.53 76.18
Gwangju (86) 67.15 84.01 85.17 63.66
Anseong (37) 59.46 80.41 81.76 70.27 Region of Hanam (43) 67.44 87.79 84.30 81.40 residence Uiwang (46) 66.30 84.24 84.78 75.54
Osan (53) 69.81 84.43 84.43 76.89
Gwacheon (20) 67.50 86.25 82.50 75.00
Yeoju (20) 68.75 88.75 86.25 73.75
Yangpyeong County (20) 60.00 90.00 83.75 82.50
Goyang (280) 68.48 80.00 82.95 69.73
Uijeongbu (130) 67.31 78.85 81.92 67.69
Namyangju (160) 65.63 84.38 85.31 68.75
Paju (96) 62.24 82.03 80.99 69.53
Guri (54) 63.89 83.33 81.48 69.91
Pocheon (35) 65.71 80.00 77.86 65.71
Yangju (48) 66.15 84.38 88.54 72.92
Dongducheon (26) 59.62 72.12 84.62 75.00
Gapyeong County (20) 67.50 88.75 83.75 80.00
Yeoncheon County (20) 62.50 80.00 82.50 72.50
62 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
1) Satisfied with amount of youth basic income provided
As for the question on whether the respondents were satisfied with the payment amount, 60.2% responded by saying ‘Yes’ (Very so: 22.7% + Mostly so: 37.5%) which was higher than 13.7 who responded by saying ‘Not so’ (Not so much: 10.8% + Not at all: 2.9%).
[Figure 27] Satisfied with the amount of youth basic income provided [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
Not so Yes
Not so 37.5 13.7% Average 26.1 Yes 66.56 out 22.7 60.2% of 100 points Average 26.1% 10.8 2.9
Not at all Not so mush Average Mostly so Very so
Analysis per characteristics
● As for the response, 'Yes' per respondent characteristics, it was relatively high in higher educational level, those who were currently employed and with higher standard of living.
● As for the response 'Yes' per region of residence, Hanam City was the highest with 69.8% followed by Countypo City (69.0%) and Siheung City (66.7%).
63 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Table 12-1] Satisfied with the amount of youth basic income provided – Per respondent characteristics
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
[Average No. of Not at Not so Mostly Very Average [No] [Average] [Quite so] converted cases all much so so to 100 pts]
All (3500) 2.9 10.8 26.1 37.5 22.7 13.7 26.1 60.2 66.56
Male (1221) 4.3 10.7 24.6 34.3 26.1 15.0 24.6 60.4 66.83 Gender Female (2279) 2.2 10.9 26.9 39.3 20.8 13.0 26.9 60.1 66.42
High graduate and below (500) 4.8 14.8 26.4 34.6 19.4 19.6 26.4 54.0 62.25 Educational University student (826) 3.8 11.5 24.3 36.3 24.1 15.3 24.3 60.4 66.37 background University graduate and above (2174) 2.1 9.7 26.7 38.7 22.9 11.8 26.7 61.5 67.63
Single (3414) 2.9 10.7 26.2 37.7 22.6 13.5 26.2 60.3 66.62 Marital Married (79) 3.8 17.7 24.1 30.4 24.1 21.5 24.1 54.4 63.29 status Others (7) 0.0 14.3 0.0 57.1 28.6 14.3 0.0 85.7 75.00
1-person household (324) 6.2 9.6 23.8 34.0 26.5 15.7 23.8 60.5 66.28
Married household (27) 3.7 14.8 22.2 33.3 25.9 18.5 22.2 59.3 65.74 Household Lives with children (37) 5.4 13.5 27.0 29.7 24.3 18.9 27.0 54.1 63.51 type Lives with parents (2846) 2.5 11.0 26.3 38.1 22.1 13.5 26.3 60.2 66.58
Others (266) 3.0 9.4 26.7 37.6 23.3 12.4 26.7 60.9 67.20
Student (with part-time job) (327) 3.7 12.5 26.0 34.9 22.9 16.2 26.0 57.8 65.21
Student (without part-time job) (438) 3.7 9.8 25.1 34.7 26.7 13.5 25.1 61.4 67.75
Current Unemployed (934) 2.8 10.6 27.6 39.0 20.0 13.4 27.6 59.0 65.71 identity status Soldier (32) 0.0 12.5 31.3 40.6 15.6 12.5 31.3 56.3 64.84
Employed (1607) 2.7 10.4 25.0 38.5 23.5 13.1 25.0 62.0 67.44
Others (162) 2.5 15.4 30.2 32.7 19.1 17.9 30.2 51.9 62.65
Below KRW 1 million (175) 5.7 13.7 30.9 27.4 22.3 19.4 30.9 49.7 61.71
KRW 1~below 2 million (546) 3.3 13.6 27.8 33.9 21.4 16.8 27.8 55.3 64.15
KRW 2~below 3 million (842) 3.4 11.3 24.5 38.5 22.3 14.7 24.5 60.8 66.24 Household KRW 3~below 4 million (450) 1.6 12.4 24.7 37.8 23.6 14.0 24.7 61.3 67.33 income KRW 4~below 5 million (522) 2.1 10.5 26.4 40.0 20.9 12.6 26.4 60.9 66.76
KRW 5~below 6 million (291) 2.7 7.9 29.6 40.2 19.6 10.7 29.6 59.8 66.49
Above KRW 6 million (674) 2.7 7.7 24.6 38.7 26.3 10.4 24.6 65.0 69.55
High (398) 3.3 4.0 23.6 41.2 27.9 7.3 23.6 69.1 71.61 Standard Mid (1476) 2.4 8.5 24.9 41.2 23.0 11.0 24.9 64.2 68.43 of living Low (1626) 3.2 14.6 27.8 33.3 21.1 17.8 27.8 54.4 63.64
64 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
[Table 12-2] Satisfied with the amount of youth basic income provided – Per region of residence
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
[Average No. of Not at Not so Mostly Very Average [No] [Average] [Quite so] converted cases all much so so to 100 pts]
All (City) (3500) 2.9 10.8 26.1 37.5 22.7 13.7 26.1 60.2 66.56
Suwon (363) 1.7 9.6 28.7 36.6 23.4 11.3 28.7 60.1 67.63
Seongnam (254) 4.3 7.9 23.6 39.4 24.8 12.2 23.6 64.2 68.11
Bucheon (261) 1.9 10.3 27.6 37.9 22.2 12.3 27.6 60.2 67.05
Anyang (185) 3.8 9.7 28.1 36.8 21.6 13.5 28.1 58.4 65.68
Ansan (239) 1.7 14.6 25.5 32.6 25.5 16.3 25.5 58.2 66.42
Yongin (270) 3.3 11.9 24.8 37.0 23.0 15.2 24.8 60.0 66.11
Pyeongtaek (131) 5.3 13.7 23.7 38.2 19.1 19.1 23.7 57.3 62.98
Gwangmyeong (96) 5.2 14.6 28.1 32.3 19.8 19.8 28.1 52.1 61.72
Siheung (144) 2.8 4.9 25.7 36.1 30.6 7.6 25.7 66.7 71.70
Gunpo (84) 1.2 6.0 23.8 46.4 22.6 7.1 23.8 69.0 70.83
Hwaseong (155) 3.2 10.3 26.5 41.3 18.7 13.5 26.5 60.0 65.48
Icheon (39) 7.7 10.3 28.2 35.9 17.9 17.9 28.2 53.8 61.54
Gimpo (85) 2.4 7.1 29.4 41.2 20.0 9.4 29.4 61.2 67.35
Gwangju (86) 4.7 7.0 26.7 38.4 23.3 11.6 26.7 61.6 67.15
Anseong (37) 5.4 10.8 35.1 37.8 10.8 16.2 35.1 48.6 59.46 Region of Hanam (43) 7.0 4.7 18.6 51.2 18.6 11.6 18.6 69.8 67.44 residence Uiwang (46) 2.2 13.0 23.9 39.1 21.7 15.2 23.9 60.9 66.30
Osan (53) 0.0 7.5 32.1 34.0 26.4 7.5 32.1 60.4 69.81
Gwacheon (20) 0.0 15.0 25.0 35.0 25.0 15.0 25.0 60.0 67.50
Yeoju (20) 5.0 5.0 25.0 40.0 25.0 10.0 25.0 65.0 68.75
Yangpyeong County (20) 5.0 15.0 35.0 25.0 20.0 20.0 35.0 45.0 60.00
Goyang (280) 1.4 10.4 26.8 35.7 25.7 11.8 26.8 61.4 68.48
Uijeongbu (130) 0.8 13.1 24.6 39.2 22.3 13.8 24.6 61.5 67.31
Namyangju (160) 2.5 13.1 25.0 38.1 21.3 15.6 25.0 59.4 65.63
Paju (96) 4.2 15.6 22.9 41.7 15.6 19.8 22.9 57.3 62.24
Guri (54) 5.6 11.1 24.1 40.7 18.5 16.7 24.1 59.3 63.89
Pocheon (35) 0.0 14.3 22.9 48.6 14.3 14.3 22.9 62.9 65.71
Yangju (48) 4.2 18.8 12.5 37.5 27.1 22.9 12.5 64.6 66.15
Dongducheon (26) 3.8 23.1 30.8 15.4 26.9 26.9 30.8 42.3 59.62
Gapyeong County (20) 5.0 5.0 25.0 45.0 20.0 10.0 25.0 65.0 67.50
Yeoncheon County (20) 0.0 20.0 35.0 20.0 25.0 20.0 35.0 45.0 62.50
65 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
2) Gyeonggi local currency is well delivered & paid
As for the question on whether Gyeonggi local currency was well delivered and paid, 87.1% responded by saying ‘Yes’ (Very so: 49.2% + Mostly so: 37.9%) which was higher than 2.6% who responded by saying ‘Not so’ (Not so much: 2.1% + Not at all: 0.5%).
[Figure 28] Gyeonggi local currency is well delivered & paid [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
Not so Yes Not so 2.6% 49.2
37.9 Average Average 10.3% Yes 83.32 out 87.1% of 100 points 10.3
0.5 2.1
Not at all Not so mush Average Mostly so Very so
Analysis per characteristics
● As for the response, 'Yes' per respondent characteristics, it was relatively high in university students, who were currently soldiers and with higher standard of living.
● As for the response 'Yes' per region of residence, Gapyeong County (n=20) was the highest with 100.0% followed by Yeoju City and Yangpyeong County (95.0%, n=20 respectively), Guri City (92.6%).
66 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
[Table 13-1] Gyeonggi local currency is well delivered & paid – Per respondent characteristics
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
[Average No. of Not at Not so Mostly Very Average [No] [Average] [Quite so] converted cases all much so so to 100 pts]
All (3500) 0.5 2.1 10.3 37.9 49.2 2.6 10.3 87.1 83.32
Male (1221) 0.7 1.6 10.5 36.4 50.9 2.3 10.5 87.2 83.78 Gender Female (2279) 0.4 2.3 10.2 38.8 48.3 2.7 10.2 87.1 83.07
High graduate and below (500) 0.6 1.2 13.2 36.4 48.6 1.8 13.2 85.0 82.80 Educational University student (826) 0.7 2.3 8.7 40.3 47.9 3.0 8.7 88.3 83.11 background University graduate and above (2174) 0.4 2.2 10.2 37.4 49.8 2.6 10.2 87.2 83.52
Single (3414) 0.5 2.1 10.4 38.0 49.0 2.6 10.4 87.0 83.22 Marital Married (79) 0.0 0.0 7.6 39.2 53.2 0.0 7.6 92.4 86.39 status Others (7) 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 0.0 0.0 100.0 96.43
1-person household (324) 1.2 2.2 9.3 37.3 50.0 3.4 9.3 87.3 83.18
Married household (27) 0.0 0.0 0.0 37.0 63.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 90.74 Household Lives with children (37) 0.0 0.0 10.8 43.2 45.9 0.0 10.8 89.2 83.78 type Lives with parents (2846) 0.5 2.1 10.5 37.9 49.1 2.6 10.5 87.0 83.25
Others (266) 0.0 2.3 10.5 38.3 48.9 2.3 10.5 87.2 83.46
Student (with part-time job) (327) 0.9 2.1 8.3 37.3 51.4 3.1 8.3 88.7 84.02
Student (without part-time job) (438) 0.5 1.6 7.5 40.9 49.5 2.1 7.5 90.4 84.36
Current Unemployed (934) 0.3 2.7 10.2 38.1 48.7 3.0 10.2 86.8 83.06 identity status Soldier (32) 3.1 0.0 6.3 46.9 43.8 3.1 6.3 90.6 82.03
Employed (1607) 0.4 2.1 11.4 36.6 49.5 2.5 11.4 86.1 83.18
Others (162) 0.6 0.6 12.3 42.0 44.4 1.2 12.3 86.4 82.25
Below KRW 1 million (175) 0.6 3.4 13.7 32.0 50.3 4.0 13.7 82.3 82.00
KRW 1~below 2 million (546) 0.9 1.8 12.6 37.5 47.1 2.7 12.6 84.6 82.01
KRW 2~below 3 million (842) 0.5 2.5 10.6 38.0 48.5 3.0 10.6 86.5 82.87 Household KRW 3~below 4 million (450) 0.2 2.9 8.2 39.3 49.3 3.1 8.2 88.7 83.67 income KRW 4~below 5 million (522) 0.2 2.3 10.0 37.4 50.2 2.5 10.0 87.5 83.76
KRW 5~below 6 million (291) 0.7 1.4 8.9 42.6 46.4 2.1 8.9 89.0 83.16
Above KRW 6 million (674) 0.4 1.0 9.3 37.2 51.9 1.5 9.3 89.2 84.79
High (398) 0.3 1.5 8.5 34.4 55.3 1.8 8.5 89.7 85.74 Standard Mid (1476) 0.2 1.7 10.2 39.8 48.1 1.9 10.2 87.9 83.47 of living Low (1626) 0.8 2.6 10.8 37.1 48.7 3.4 10.8 85.9 82.60
67 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Table 13-2] Gyeonggi local currency is well delivered & paid – Per region of residence
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
[Average No. of Not at Not so Mostly Very Average [No] [Average] [Quite so] converted cases all much so so to 100 pts]
All (City) (3500) 0.5 2.1 10.3 37.9 49.2 2.6 10.3 87.1 83.32
Suwon (363) 0.3 1.1 8.3 37.5 52.9 1.4 8.3 90.4 85.40
Seongnam (254) 0.4 1.6 13.8 43.7 40.6 2.0 13.8 84.3 80.61
Bucheon (261) 1.1 1.1 9.6 37.5 50.6 2.3 9.6 88.1 83.81
Anyang (185) 0.0 0.5 8.6 34.6 56.2 0.5 8.6 90.8 86.62
Ansan (239) 0.0 2.1 5.9 36.0 56.1 2.1 5.9 92.1 86.51
Yongin (270) 0.0 1.5 10.7 39.3 48.5 1.5 10.7 87.8 83.70
Pyeongtaek (131) 0.0 2.3 14.5 39.7 43.5 2.3 14.5 83.2 81.11
Gwangmyeong (96) 1.0 2.1 9.4 35.4 52.1 3.1 9.4 87.5 83.85
Siheung (144) 0.7 0.0 8.3 33.3 57.6 0.7 8.3 91.0 86.81
Gunpo (84) 1.2 1.2 8.3 41.7 47.6 2.4 8.3 89.3 83.33
Hwaseong (155) 1.9 2.6 16.1 41.9 37.4 4.5 16.1 79.4 77.58
Icheon (39) 0.0 0.0 12.8 33.3 53.8 0.0 12.8 87.2 85.26
Gimpo (85) 0.0 3.5 8.2 34.1 54.1 3.5 8.2 88.2 84.71
Gwangju (86) 0.0 1.2 15.1 30.2 53.5 1.2 15.1 83.7 84.01
Anseong (37) 0.0 5.4 16.2 29.7 48.6 5.4 16.2 78.4 80.41 Region of Hanam (43) 0.0 0.0 9.3 30.2 60.5 0.0 9.3 90.7 87.79 residence Uiwang (46) 0.0 4.3 8.7 32.6 54.3 4.3 8.7 87.0 84.24
Osan (53) 0.0 0.0 11.3 39.6 49.1 0.0 11.3 88.7 84.43
Gwacheon (20) 0.0 0.0 10.0 35.0 55.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 86.25
Yeoju (20) 0.0 0.0 5.0 35.0 60.0 0.0 5.0 95.0 88.75
Yangpyeong County (20) 0.0 5.0 0.0 25.0 70.0 5.0 0.0 95.0 90.00
Goyang (280) 1.4 5.4 11.4 35.4 46.4 6.8 11.4 81.8 80.00
Uijeongbu (130) 0.0 4.6 13.8 43.1 38.5 4.6 13.8 81.5 78.85
Namyangju (160) 0.0 2.5 6.9 41.3 49.4 2.5 6.9 90.6 84.38
Paju (96) 2.1 1.0 9.4 41.7 45.8 3.1 9.4 87.5 82.03
Guri (54) 0.0 0.0 7.4 51.9 40.7 0.0 7.4 92.6 83.33
Pocheon (35) 0.0 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 80.00
Yangju (48) 0.0 4.2 6.3 37.5 52.1 4.2 6.3 89.6 84.38
Dongducheon (26) 0.0 15.4 15.4 34.6 34.6 15.4 15.4 69.2 72.12
Gapyeong County (20) 0.0 0.0 0.0 45.0 55.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 88.75
Yeoncheon County (20) 0.0 5.0 15.0 35.0 45.0 5.0 15.0 80.0 80.00
68 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
3) Fully understand the initiative for receiving as Gyeonggi local currency
As for the question on whether the initiative for receiving Gyeonggi local currency was fully understood, 87.9% responded by saying ‘Yes’ (Very so: 48.3% + Mostly so: 39.6%) which was higher than 39.6% who responded by saying ‘Not so’ (Not so much: 1.7% + Not at all: 0.8%).
[Figure 29] Fully understand the initiative for receiving as [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %] Gyeonggi local currency
Not so Yes
Not so 48.3 2.5% 39.6 Average Average 83.21 out Yes 9.6% 87.9% of 100 points 9.6
0.8 1.7
Not at all Not so mush Average Mostly so Very so
Analysis per characteristics
● As for the response, 'Yes' per respondent characteristics, it was relatively high in university students, who were currently students (with part-time job) and with household income of KRW 3 ~ below 4 million.
● As for the response 'Yes' per region of residence, Gapyeong County (n=20) were the highest with 95.0% followed by Namyangju City (92.5%) and Yangju City (91.7%).
69 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Table 14-1] Fully understand the initiative for receiving as Gyeonggi local currency – Per respondent characteristics [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
[Average No. of Not at Not so Mostly Very Average [No] [Average] [Quite so] converted cases all much so so to 100 pts]
All (3500) 0.8 1.7 9.6 39.6 48.3 2.5 9.6 87.9 83.21
Male (1221) 1.4 2.0 8.8 39.2 48.6 3.4 8.8 87.8 82.90 Gender Female (2279) 0.5 1.6 10.0 39.8 48.1 2.1 10.0 87.9 83.37
High graduate and below (500) 0.2 1.6 12.4 38.0 47.8 1.8 12.4 85.8 82.90 Educational University student (826) 1.0 2.1 7.7 41.9 47.3 3.0 7.7 89.2 83.14 background University graduate and above (2174) 0.9 1.6 9.7 39.1 48.8 2.5 9.7 87.8 83.30
Single (3414) 0.8 1.7 9.6 39.8 48.1 2.5 9.6 87.9 83.15 Marital Married (79) 0.0 2.5 11.4 32.9 53.2 2.5 11.4 86.1 84.18 status Others (7) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.00
1-person household (324) 0.9 1.9 9.0 38.3 50.0 2.8 9.0 88.3 83.64
Married household (27) 0.0 0.0 7.4 37.0 55.6 0.0 7.4 92.6 87.04 Household Lives with children (37) 0.0 0.0 10.8 37.8 51.4 0.0 10.8 89.2 85.14 type Lives with parents (2846) 0.8 1.5 9.7 39.7 48.3 2.4 9.7 88.0 83.27
Others (266) 0.4 4.1 10.2 40.6 44.7 4.5 10.2 85.3 81.30
Student (with part-time job) (327) 0.9 2.1 6.4 41.3 49.2 3.1 6.4 90.5 83.94
Student (without part-time job) (438) 1.1 1.4 7.8 41.8 47.9 2.5 7.8 89.7 83.50
Current Unemployed (934) 0.3 1.7 11.7 39.5 46.8 2.0 11.7 86.3 82.68 identity status Soldier (32) 0.0 6.3 6.3 50.0 37.5 6.3 6.3 87.5 79.69
Employed (1607) 1.1 1.6 9.5 38.6 49.3 2.6 9.5 87.9 83.37
Others (162) 0.0 2.5 11.1 38.3 48.1 2.5 11.1 86.4 83.02
Below KRW 1 million (175) 0.6 3.4 18.9 33.7 43.4 4.0 18.9 77.1 79.00
KRW 1~below 2 million (546) 0.4 1.5 10.1 40.1 48.0 1.8 10.1 88.1 83.47
KRW 2~below 3 million (842) 0.4 1.1 9.3 39.0 50.4 1.4 9.3 89.3 84.47 Household KRW 3~below 4 million (450) 0.7 1.6 7.3 41.8 48.7 2.2 7.3 90.4 84.06 income KRW 4~below 5 million (522) 1.0 1.7 9.2 39.8 48.3 2.7 9.2 88.1 83.19
KRW 5~below 6 million (291) 2.4 1.0 10.7 41.9 44.0 3.4 10.7 85.9 81.01
Above KRW 6 million (674) 1.0 2.7 8.8 38.7 48.8 3.7 8.8 87.5 82.90
High (398) 2.0 2.5 8.8 38.9 47.7 4.5 8.8 86.7 81.97 Standard Mid (1476) 0.6 1.9 9.3 41.7 46.5 2.5 9.3 88.1 82.88 of living Low (1626) 0.7 1.4 10.1 37.8 50.1 2.0 10.1 87.9 83.81
70 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
[Table 14-2] Fully understand the initiative for receiving as Gyeonggi local currency – Per region of residence
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
[Average No. of Not at Not so Mostly Very Average [No] [Average] [Quite so] converted cases all much so so to 100 pts]
All (City) (3500) 0.8 1.7 9.6 39.6 48.3 2.5 9.6 87.9 83.21
Suwon (363) 0.3 1.9 9.6 39.9 48.2 2.2 9.6 88.2 83.47
Seongnam (254) 2.0 3.5 11.4 41.3 41.7 5.5 11.4 83.1 79.33
Bucheon (261) 1.9 2.7 7.3 38.3 49.8 4.6 7.3 88.1 82.85
Anyang (185) 1.1 1.1 9.7 35.7 52.4 2.2 9.7 88.1 84.32
Ansan (239) 0.0 0.8 7.5 35.6 56.1 0.8 7.5 91.6 86.72
Yongin (270) 0.4 1.5 9.3 43.0 45.9 1.9 9.3 88.9 83.15
Pyeongtaek (131) 0.8 0.8 9.2 45.0 44.3 1.5 9.2 89.3 82.82
Gwangmyeong (96) 2.1 3.1 12.5 36.5 45.8 5.2 12.5 82.3 80.21
Siheung (144) 2.1 0.7 7.6 36.1 53.5 2.8 7.6 89.6 84.55
Gunpo (84) 0.0 0.0 9.5 36.9 53.6 0.0 9.5 90.5 86.01
Hwaseong (155) 0.6 1.3 12.9 45.2 40.0 1.9 12.9 85.2 80.65
Icheon (39) 0.0 2.6 15.4 30.8 51.3 2.6 15.4 82.1 82.69
Gimpo (85) 1.2 2.4 8.2 37.6 50.6 3.5 8.2 88.2 83.53
Gwangju (86) 0.0 1.2 10.5 34.9 53.5 1.2 10.5 88.4 85.17
Anseong (37) 0.0 0.0 16.2 40.5 43.2 0.0 16.2 83.8 81.76 Region of Hanam (43) 2.3 0.0 11.6 30.2 55.8 2.3 11.6 86.0 84.30 residence Uiwang (46) 0.0 0.0 8.7 43.5 47.8 0.0 8.7 91.3 84.78
Osan (53) 0.0 0.0 9.4 43.4 47.2 0.0 9.4 90.6 84.43
Gwacheon (20) 0.0 5.0 10.0 35.0 50.0 5.0 10.0 85.0 82.50
Yeoju (20) 0.0 0.0 10.0 35.0 55.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 86.25
Yangpyeong County (20) 0.0 0.0 20.0 25.0 55.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 83.75
Goyang (280) 0.7 2.1 10.0 38.9 48.2 2.9 10.0 87.1 82.95
Uijeongbu (130) 0.0 1.5 11.5 44.6 42.3 1.5 11.5 86.9 81.92
Namyangju (160) 0.0 1.3 6.3 42.5 50.0 1.3 6.3 92.5 85.31
Paju (96) 1.0 2.1 12.5 40.6 43.8 3.1 12.5 84.4 80.99
Guri (54) 3.7 1.9 3.7 46.3 44.4 5.6 3.7 90.7 81.48
Pocheon (35) 0.0 8.6 8.6 45.7 37.1 8.6 8.6 82.9 77.86
Yangju (48) 0.0 0.0 8.3 29.2 62.5 0.0 8.3 91.7 88.54
Dongducheon (26) 0.0 3.8 7.7 34.6 53.8 3.8 7.7 88.5 84.62
Gapyeong County (20) 0.0 0.0 5.0 55.0 40.0 0.0 5.0 95.0 83.75
Yeoncheon County (20) 0.0 0.0 15.0 40.0 45.0 0.0 15.0 85.0 82.50
71 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
4) There is no inconvenience in using Gyeonggi local currency
As for the question on whether there was no inconvenience in using Gyeonggi local currency, 66.5% responded by saying ‘Yes’ (Very so: 31.3% + Mostly so: 35.2%) which was higher than 13.5% who responded by saying ‘Not so’ (Not so much: 10.1% + Not at all: 3.4%).
[Figure 30] There is no inconvenience in using Gyeonggi local currency [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
Not so Yes
Not so 13.5% Average 35.2 31.3 Yes 70.25 out 66.5% of 100 points Average 20.0 20.0% 10.1 3.4
Not at all Not so mush Average Mostly so Very so
Analysis per characteristics
● As for the response, 'Yes' per respondent characteristics, it was relatively high in higher educational level, who were currently students (with part-time job) and with higher standard of living.
● As for the response 'Yes' per region of residence, Yangpyeong County (n=20) was the highest with 90.0% followed by Yeoju City and Gapyeong County (85.0%, n=20 respectively) and Hanam City (83.7%).
72 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
[Table 15-1] There is no inconvenience in using Gyeonggi local currency – Per respondent characteristics [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
[Average No. of Not at Not so Mostly Very Average [No] [Average] [Quite so] converted cases all much so so to 100 pts]
All (3500) 3.4 10.1 20.0 35.2 31.3 13.5 20.0 66.5 70.25
Male (1221) 3.7 8.1 20.3 34.3 33.6 11.8 20.3 67.9 71.50 Gender Female (2279) 3.2 11.1 19.9 35.7 30.1 14.3 19.9 65.8 69.58
High graduate and below (500) 4.0 10.0 21.4 33.6 31.0 14.0 21.4 64.6 69.40 Educational University student (826) 4.1 10.7 18.8 36.6 29.9 14.8 18.8 66.5 69.37 background University graduate and above (2174) 2.9 9.9 20.2 35.1 31.9 12.8 20.2 67.0 70.78
Single (3414) 3.4 10.1 20.0 35.3 31.1 13.6 20.0 66.4 70.14 Marital Married (79) 1.3 8.9 20.3 31.6 38.0 10.1 20.3 69.6 74.05 status Others (7) 0.0 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 0.0 14.3 85.7 82.14
1-person household (324) 6.5 10.5 21.3 30.6 31.2 17.0 21.3 61.7 67.36
Married household (27) 3.7 14.8 18.5 22.2 40.7 18.5 18.5 63.0 70.37 Household Lives with children (37) 0.0 8.1 18.9 37.8 35.1 8.1 18.9 73.0 75.00 type Lives with parents (2846) 3.0 10.1 20.0 35.7 31.2 13.1 20.0 66.9 70.53
Others (266) 4.1 9.4 19.2 36.5 30.8 13.5 19.2 67.3 70.11
Student (with part-time job) (327) 5.5 9.5 15.3 37.3 32.4 15.0 15.3 69.7 70.41
Student (without part-time job) (438) 4.3 8.9 19.4 35.2 32.2 13.2 19.4 67.4 70.49
Current Unemployed (934) 2.6 11.7 20.4 34.3 31.0 14.2 20.4 65.3 69.89 identity status Soldier (32) 3.1 21.9 18.8 31.3 25.0 25.0 18.8 56.3 63.28
Employed (1607) 3.1 9.6 20.9 35.4 30.9 12.8 20.9 66.3 70.35
Others (162) 3.7 7.4 20.4 35.2 33.3 11.1 20.4 68.5 71.76
Below KRW 1 million (175) 4.0 13.1 25.1 30.3 27.4 17.1 25.1 57.7 66.00
KRW 1~below 2 million (546) 3.5 9.5 21.8 34.1 31.1 13.0 21.8 65.2 69.96
KRW 2~below 3 million (842) 3.4 9.7 19.5 36.5 30.9 13.2 19.5 67.3 70.40 Household KRW 3~below 4 million (450) 2.9 11.6 17.6 36.2 31.8 14.4 17.6 68.0 70.61 income KRW 4~below 5 million (522) 2.3 10.9 20.1 34.9 31.8 13.2 20.1 66.7 70.74
KRW 5~below 6 million (291) 3.8 8.9 22.7 34.7 29.9 12.7 22.7 64.6 69.50
Above KRW 6 million (674) 4.0 9.1 18.4 35.6 32.9 13.1 18.4 68.5 71.11
High (398) 3.8 7.5 18.1 35.7 34.9 11.3 18.1 70.6 72.61 Standard Mid (1476) 2.6 9.4 20.0 37.5 30.5 12.1 20.0 68.0 70.93 of living Low (1626) 3.9 11.3 20.5 33.0 31.2 15.3 20.5 64.2 69.05
73 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Table 15-2] There is no inconvenience in using Gyeonggi local currency – Per region of residence
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
[Average No. of Not at Not so Mostly Very Average [No] [Average] [Quite so] converted cases all much so so to 100 pts]
All (City) (3500) 3.4 10.1 20.0 35.2 31.3 13.5 20.0 66.5 70.25
Suwon (363) 5.0 10.2 21.5 38.0 25.3 15.2 21.5 63.4 67.15
Seongnam (254) 4.7 13.4 19.7 30.3 31.9 18.1 19.7 62.2 67.81
Bucheon (261) 2.3 11.9 16.5 36.4 33.0 14.2 16.5 69.3 71.46
Anyang (185) 3.8 13.5 20.5 32.4 29.7 17.3 20.5 62.2 67.70
Ansan (239) 1.3 2.9 12.6 38.9 44.4 4.2 12.6 83.3 80.54
Yongin (270) 2.6 8.5 26.7 34.1 28.1 11.1 26.7 62.2 69.17
Pyeongtaek (131) 3.8 11.5 23.7 36.6 24.4 15.3 23.7 61.1 66.60
Gwangmyeong (96) 5.2 11.5 20.8 35.4 27.1 16.7 20.8 62.5 66.93
Siheung (144) 4.9 9.7 27.8 29.9 27.8 14.6 27.8 57.6 66.49
Gunpo (84) 1.2 4.8 16.7 39.3 38.1 6.0 16.7 77.4 77.08
Hwaseong (155) 2.6 16.8 15.5 36.1 29.0 19.4 15.5 65.2 68.06
Icheon (39) 2.6 7.7 30.8 35.9 23.1 10.3 30.8 59.0 67.31
Gimpo (85) 2.4 8.2 10.6 40.0 38.8 10.6 10.6 78.8 76.18
Gwangju (86) 3.5 15.1 30.2 25.6 25.6 18.6 30.2 51.2 63.66
Anseong (37) 2.7 8.1 24.3 35.1 29.7 10.8 24.3 64.9 70.27 Region of Hanam (43) 2.3 7.0 7.0 30.2 53.5 9.3 7.0 83.7 81.40 residence Uiwang (46) 0.0 8.7 19.6 32.6 39.1 8.7 19.6 71.7 75.54
Osan (53) 3.8 3.8 11.3 43.4 37.7 7.5 11.3 81.1 76.89
Gwacheon (20) 0.0 20.0 5.0 30.0 45.0 20.0 5.0 75.0 75.00
Yeoju (20) 0.0 15.0 0.0 60.0 25.0 15.0 0.0 85.0 73.75
Yangpyeong County (20) 0.0 10.0 0.0 40.0 50.0 10.0 0.0 90.0 82.50
Goyang (280) 2.5 13.2 17.9 35.7 30.7 15.7 17.9 66.4 69.73
Uijeongbu (130) 4.6 9.2 23.8 35.4 26.9 13.8 23.8 62.3 67.69
Namyangju (160) 6.3 6.3 21.9 37.5 28.1 12.5 21.9 65.6 68.75
Paju (96) 3.1 8.3 26.0 32.3 30.2 11.5 26.0 62.5 69.53
Guri (54) 3.7 5.6 29.6 29.6 31.5 9.3 29.6 61.1 69.91
Pocheon (35) 2.9 8.6 28.6 42.9 17.1 11.4 28.6 60.0 65.71
Yangju (48) 4.2 6.3 20.8 31.3 37.5 10.4 20.8 68.8 72.92
Dongducheon (26) 7.7 7.7 11.5 23.1 50.0 15.4 11.5 73.1 75.00
Gapyeong County (20) 0.0 5.0 10.0 45.0 40.0 5.0 10.0 85.0 80.00
Yeoncheon County (20) 0.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 40.0 15.0 20.0 65.0 72.50
74 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
4 Overall satisfaction of youth basic income project
How satisfied are you generally regarding the 'Youth basic income' project of Q Gyeonggi Province in the 7th Local Election period?
As for the overall satisfaction of the youth basic income project, 82.7% responded by saying ‘Yes’ (Very so: 30.6% + Mostly so: 52.0%) which was higher than 3.3% who responded by saying ‘Not so’ (Not so much: 2.3% + Not at all: 1.1%).
[Figure 31] Overall satisfaction of youth basic income project [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
Dissatisfied Satisfied
Dissatisfied 52.0 3.3%
Average 30.6 77.22 out Satisfied Average of 100 82.7% 14.0% points 14.0
1.1 2.3
Not satisfied Not Average Satisfied Very at all satisfied satisfied
Analysis per characteristics
● As for the response, ‘Satisfied’ per respondent characteristics, it was relatively higher in female, with higher education level, who were currently students (with part-time job) and with household income of KRW 4 million~below KRW 5 million.
● As for the response ‘Satisfied’ per region of residence, Gapyeong County (n=20) was the highest with 95.0% followed by Yangju City (93.8%) and Yeoju City (90.0%, n=20).
75 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Table 16-1] Overall satisfaction of youth basic income project – Per respondent characteristics
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
Not [Average No. of Not so Very satisfied Average Satisfied [Unsatisfied] [Average] [Satisfied] converted cases satisfied Satisfied at all to 100 pts]
All (3500) 1.1 2.3 14.0 52.0 30.6 3.3 14.0 82.7 77.22
Male (1221) 2.4 2.4 14.9 49.0 31.4 4.8 14.9 80.3 76.15 Gender Female (2279) 0.4 2.2 13.5 53.7 30.2 2.6 13.5 83.9 77.80
High graduate and below (500) 0.6 2.4 19.4 48.8 28.8 3.0 19.4 77.6 75.70 Educational University student (826) 2.2 3.0 11.9 53.0 29.9 5.2 11.9 82.9 76.36 background University graduate and above (2174) 0.7 2.0 13.6 52.4 31.3 2.7 13.6 83.7 77.90
Single (3414) 1.1 2.3 14.1 52.1 30.5 3.4 14.1 82.6 77.17 Marital Married (79) 1.3 1.3 10.1 53.2 34.2 2.5 10.1 87.3 79.43 status Others (7) 0.0 0.0 28.6 28.6 42.9 0.0 28.6 71.4 78.57
1-person household (324) 0.9 3.7 12.7 49.4 33.3 4.6 12.7 82.7 77.62
Married household (27) 0.0 0.0 7.4 59.3 33.3 0.0 7.4 92.6 81.48 Household Lives with children (37) 2.7 2.7 10.8 48.6 35.1 5.4 10.8 83.8 77.70 type Lives with parents (2846) 1.1 2.1 14.6 52.0 30.1 3.3 14.6 82.2 76.98
Others (266) 0.4 2.3 10.5 55.3 31.6 2.6 10.5 86.8 78.85
Student (with part-time job) (327) 2.1 2.4 8.6 56.6 30.3 4.6 8.6 86.9 77.60
Student (without part-time job) (438) 1.6 4.1 11.9 52.5 29.9 5.7 11.9 82.4 76.26
Current Unemployed (934) 1.1 2.7 14.3 53.7 28.2 3.7 14.3 81.9 76.31 identity status Soldier (32) 3.1 3.1 18.8 50.0 25.0 6.3 18.8 75.0 72.66
Employed (1607) 0.7 1.6 15.2 49.9 32.6 2.2 15.2 82.5 78.05
Others (162) 0.6 1.9 15.4 53.1 29.0 2.5 15.4 82.1 77.01
Below KRW 1 million (175) 1.7 4.0 22.9 42.3 29.1 5.7 22.9 71.4 73.29
KRW 1~below 2 million (546) 0.5 1.8 16.5 53.7 27.5 2.4 16.5 81.1 76.42
KRW 2~below 3 million (842) 0.7 1.5 15.1 50.8 31.8 2.3 15.1 82.7 77.88 Household KRW 3~below 4 million (450) 1.1 3.1 12.0 53.3 30.4 4.2 12.0 83.8 77.22 income KRW 4~below 5 million (522) 1.0 1.7 10.9 54.2 32.2 2.7 10.9 86.4 78.74
KRW 5~below 6 million (291) 2.1 1.7 13.1 57.7 25.4 3.8 13.1 83.2 75.69
Above KRW 6 million (674) 1.3 3.3 12.5 49.7 33.2 4.6 12.5 82.9 77.56
High (398) 2.5 3.5 11.8 48.7 33.4 6.0 11.8 82.2 76.76 Standard Mid (1476) 0.9 1.8 13.4 53.0 30.9 2.7 13.4 83.9 77.78 of living Low (1626) 0.8 2.5 15.1 52.0 29.7 3.3 15.1 81.7 76.83
76 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
[Table16-2] Overall satisfaction of youth basic income project – Per region of residence
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
Not [Average No. of Not so Very satisfied Average Satisfied [Unsatisfied] [Average] [Satisfied] converted cases satisfied Satisfied at all to 100 pts]
All (City) (3500) 1.1 2.3 14.0 52.0 30.6 3.3 14.0 82.7 77.22
Suwon (363) 0.8 0.8 16.0 51.8 30.6 1.7 16.0 82.4 77.62
Seongnam (254) 1.2 2.4 14.2 56.7 25.6 3.5 14.2 82.3 75.79
Bucheon (261) 0.8 2.7 12.6 53.6 30.3 3.4 12.6 83.9 77.49
Anyang (185) 0.5 2.7 16.8 50.3 29.7 3.2 16.8 80.0 76.49
Ansan (239) 1.3 1.3 9.2 54.4 33.9 2.5 9.2 88.3 79.60
Yongin (270) 1.5 5.6 14.8 47.4 30.7 7.0 14.8 78.1 75.09
Pyeongtaek (131) 0.8 0.0 20.6 53.4 25.2 0.8 20.6 78.6 75.57
Gwangmyeong (96) 3.1 2.1 11.5 53.1 30.2 5.2 11.5 83.3 76.30
Siheung (144) 1.4 0.7 11.8 51.4 34.7 2.1 11.8 86.1 79.34
Gunpo (84) 1.2 1.2 11.9 51.2 34.5 2.4 11.9 85.7 79.17
Hwaseong (155) 0.6 1.9 18.1 50.3 29.0 2.6 18.1 79.4 76.29
Icheon (39) 0.0 2.6 20.5 48.7 28.2 2.6 20.5 76.9 75.64
Gimpo (85) 1.2 1.2 16.5 49.4 31.8 2.4 16.5 81.2 77.35
Gwangju (86) 0.0 4.7 18.6 46.5 30.2 4.7 18.6 76.7 75.58
Anseong (37) 0.0 2.7 13.5 56.8 27.0 2.7 13.5 83.8 77.03 Region of Hanam (43) 7.0 2.3 7.0 46.5 37.2 9.3 7.0 83.7 76.16 residence Uiwang (46) 2.2 4.3 6.5 52.2 34.8 6.5 6.5 87.0 78.26
Osan (53) 1.9 0.0 20.8 39.6 37.7 1.9 20.8 77.4 77.83
Gwacheon (20) 0.0 5.0 10.0 50.0 35.0 5.0 10.0 85.0 78.75
Yeoju (20) 0.0 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 80.00
Yangpyeong County (20) 0.0 0.0 20.0 45.0 35.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 78.75
Goyang (280) 0.7 2.1 13.9 50.7 32.5 2.9 13.9 83.2 78.04
Uijeongbu (130) 0.8 2.3 15.4 53.8 27.7 3.1 15.4 81.5 76.35
Namyangju (160) 0.0 3.1 9.4 58.8 28.8 3.1 9.4 87.5 78.28
Paju (96) 0.0 3.1 10.4 51.0 35.4 3.1 10.4 86.5 79.69
Guri (54) 7.4 1.9 13.0 48.1 29.6 9.3 13.0 77.8 72.69
Pocheon (35) 0.0 5.7 20.0 57.1 17.1 5.7 20.0 74.3 71.43
Yangju (48) 0.0 0.0 6.3 68.8 25.0 0.0 6.3 93.8 79.69
Dongducheon (26) 0.0 3.8 15.4 42.3 38.5 3.8 15.4 80.8 78.85
Gapyeong County (20) 0.0 5.0 0.0 60.0 35.0 5.0 0.0 95.0 81.25
Yeoncheon County (20) 0.0 5.0 20.0 35.0 40.0 5.0 20.0 75.0 77.50
77 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
Reason for being “satisfied” 4-1 with youth basic income project (priority)
What is the reason you are satisfied with the 'Youth basic income' project of Q Gyeonggi Province? Please select up to 3 in order.
As for the reason the respondents were satisfied with the youth basic income project (n=2893), ‘Because it is paid in local currency which can be used like cash’ was the highest with 30.7% followed by ‘Because it is paid to all youths aged 24 residing in Gyeonggi Province’, and 'Because there are no conditions for receiving youth basic income such as being employed or carrying out job-seeking activities’ (14.7%). (based on 1st priority)
[Figure 32] Reason for being "satisfied' with youth basic income project (priority)
[Base: Respondents who were satisfied with youth basic income of Gyeonggi Province, n=2893, Unit: %]
1st priority 61.4 56.0 1+2+3 priority 45.7 43.6 32.4 30.7 29.6 24.5 25.0
14.7 10.1 7.7 10.4 2.8 2.7 1.5 0.2 1.0
Because Because it Because Because Because it is Because the Because online Because it Others it is paid in is paid to all there are no it helped paid directly basic income application is paid out Gyeonggi local youths aged conditions for respondents to individual amount is not method is quarterly over currency which 24 residing receiving youth to do things youth instead reduced even convenient 4 times can be used in Gyeonggi basic income that they had of householder if the youths like cash Province such as being difficulty doing have income employed or previous such through part- carrying out as leisure, time jobs and job seeking employment, others activities studies and others
Analysis per characteristics
● As for the response, 'Because it is paid in local currency which can be used like cash' per respondent characteristics, it was relatively high with lower educational level and with household income of KRW 3 million~below KRW 4 million. (based on 1st priority)
78 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
[Table 17-1-1] Reason for being "satisfied' with youth basic income project (priority) (1st priority) – Per respondent characteristics [Base: Respondents who were satisfied with youth basic income of Gyeonggi Province, n=2893, Unit: %]
Because Because it Because Because Because it is Because Because Because it is is paid to there are no it helped paid directly the basic online it is paid in all youths conditions for respondents to individual income application paid out Gyeonggi aged 24 receiving youth to do things youth amount is method is quarterly local residing in basic income that they instead of not reduced convenient over 4 No. currency Gyeonggi such as being had difficulty householder even if the times 1st priority Others of cases which Province employed or doing youths have can be carrying out previous such income used like job seeking as leisure, through cash activities employment, part-time studies and jobs and others others
All (2893) 30.7 29.6 14.7 10.1 7.7 2.8 2.7 1.5 0.2 Male (981) 30.6 32.6 12.3 9.9 6.1 3.0 3.2 2.0 0.3 Gender Female (1912) 30.8 28.0 15.9 10.1 8.6 2.8 2.4 1.2 0.2 High graduate and below (388) 31.7 28.4 13.1 8.8 9.0 3.4 3.1 2.3 0.3 Educational University student (685) 31.4 27.4 13.9 11.5 8.5 2.9 2.6 1.8 0.0 background University graduate and above (1820) 30.3 30.6 15.3 9.8 7.2 2.7 2.6 1.2 0.3 Single (2819) 30.6 29.4 14.7 10.1 7.8 2.8 2.7 1.5 0.2 Marital Married (69) 36.2 36.2 15.9 5.8 4.3 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 status Others (5) 20.0 0.0 20.0 20.0 0.0 20.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 1-person household (268) 29.1 31.7 12.7 9.0 9.0 3.0 3.0 1.9 0.7 Married household (25) 36.0 32.0 24.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Household Lives with children (31) 35.5 41.9 6.5 6.5 6.5 3.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 type Lives with parents (2338) 30.2 29.7 15.0 10.2 7.8 2.8 2.7 1.4 0.2 Others (231) 36.4 23.4 14.3 11.3 6.5 3.5 2.2 2.6 0.0 Student (with part-time job) (284) 31.0 27.8 12.0 9.9 9.2 5.6 2.5 1.8 0.4 Student (without part-time job) (361) 26.0 32.7 15.2 12.2 8.9 0.6 2.8 1.7 0.0 Current Unemployed (765) 30.8 28.1 17.0 10.7 7.3 1.7 3.0 1.2 0.1 identity status Soldier (24) 25.0 37.5 16.7 4.2 4.2 8.3 4.2 0.0 0.0 Employed (1326) 31.8 30.0 13.4 9.4 7.3 3.6 2.6 1.6 0.2 Others (133) 32.3 27.1 18.0 8.3 9.0 0.8 1.5 1.5 1.5 Below KRW 1 million (125) 25.6 23.2 18.4 10.4 13.6 3.2 3.2 2.4 0.0 KRW 1~below 2 million (443) 29.8 30.7 10.8 10.4 8.6 4.3 2.9 2.0 0.5 KRW 2~below 3 million (696) 30.6 29.2 16.2 10.5 6.5 3.2 2.3 1.1 0.4 Household KRW 3~below 4 million (377) 35.0 28.6 13.5 10.3 7.2 1.9 1.6 1.9 0.0 income KRW 4~below 5 million (451) 31.7 27.7 16.4 10.6 8.0 2.2 2.2 1.1 0.0 KRW 5~below 6 million (242) 30.2 31.4 14.5 9.1 7.4 2.5 2.9 1.7 0.4 Above KRW 6 million (559) 29.3 31.8 14.5 8.9 7.7 2.5 3.8 1.3 0.2 High (327) 23.9 38.8 14.4 9.2 6.1 2.4 3.4 1.8 0.0 Standard Mid (1238) 33.0 27.9 15.5 9.6 7.4 2.2 2.8 1.2 0.3 of living Low (1328) 30.3 28.8 14.0 10.7 8.4 3.5 2.3 1.7 0.2
79 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Table 17-1-2] Reason for being "satisfied' with youth basic income project (1st priority) – Per region of residence [Base: Respondents who were satisfied with youth basic income of Gyeonggi Province, n=2893, Unit: %] Because Because it Because Because Because it is Because the Because Because it it is paid in is paid to all there are no it helped paid directly basic income online is paid out Gyeonggi youths aged conditions respondents to individual amount is not application quarterly local 24 residing for receiving to do things youth reduced even method is over 4 currency in Gyeonggi youth basic that they had instead of if the youths convenient times No. 1st priority which can Province income such difficulty doing householder have income Others of cases be used as being previous such through part- like cash employed or as leisure, time jobs and carrying out employment, others job seeking studies and activities others
All (City) (2893) 30.7 29.6 14.7 10.1 7.7 2.8 2.7. 1.5 0.2 Suwon (299) 28.1 29.1 15.1 10.4 10.0 1.7 4.0 1.7 0.0 Seongnam (209) 32.1 26.8 14.4 11.5 7.2 2.9 1.4 3.3 0.5 Bucheon (219) 30.1 32.0 15.1 9.6 7.8 1.8 2.7 0.5 0.5 Anyang (148) 26.4 33.1 15.5 10.8 7.4 2.7 2.7 1.4 0.0 Ansan (211) 33.6 23.2 14.7 13.3 7.6 3.8 2.4 1.4 0.0 Yongin (211) 27.5 27.5 15.2 12.3 9.0 2.8 4.3 1.4 0.0 Pyeongtaek (103) 35.0 23.3 15.5 9.7 7.8 5.8 1.9 1.0 0.0 Gwangmyeong (80) 41.3 26.3 8.8 8.8 1.3 2.5 7.5 2.5 1.3 Siheung (124) 31.5 30.6 16.9 9.7 5.6 2.4 1.6 0.8 0.8 Gunpo (72) 20.8 36.1 18.1 12.5 5.6 2.8 2.8 0.0 1.4 Hwaseong (123) 26.8 30.1 13.8 10.6 11.4 4.9 0.8 0.0 1.6 Icheon (30) 46.7 33.3 0.0 3.3 10.0 3.3 3.3 0.0 0.0 Gimpo (69) 33.3 33.3 17.4 4.3 10.1 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 Gwangju (66) 25.8 40.9 7.6 12.1 7.6 1.5 3.0 1.5 0.0 Anseong (31) 29.0 25.8 16.1 6.5 12.9 6.5 0.0 3.2 0.0 Region of Hanam (36) 27.8 41.7 11.1 8.3 2.8 0.0 8.3 0.0 0.0 residence Uiwang (40) 35.0 35.0 12.5 5.0 7.5 0.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 Osan (41) 36.6 36.6 9.8 7.3 7.3 0.0 0.0 2.4 0.0 Gwacheon (17) 17.6 47.1 11.8 11.8 5.9 0.0 5.9 0.0 0.0 Yeoju (18) 27.8 44.4 22.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.6 0.0 0.0 Yangpyeong County (16) 43.8 18.8 25.0 0.0 0.0 6.3 0.0 6.3 0.0 Goyang (233) 28.8 28.8 18.5 9.9 6.4 2.1 2.1 3.4 0.0 Uijeongbu (106) 33.0 34.0 8.5 10.4 9.4 4.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 Namyangju (140) 30.0 34.3 12.9 5.7 9.3 4.3 2.1 1.4 0.0 Paju (83) 34.9 18.1 21.7 10.8 6.0 3.6 3.6 1.2 0.0 Guri (42) 21.4 26.2 21.4 21.4 7.1 0.0 0.0 2.4 0.0 Pocheon (26) 46.2 15.4 7.7 3.8 7.7 7.7 3.8 7.7 0.0 Yangju (45) 33.3 24.4 17.8 13.3 4.4 6.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 Dongducheon (21) 47.6 19.0 9.5 4.8 14.3 4.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 Gapyeong County (19) 31.6 36.8 15.8 5.3 0.0 0.0 10.5 0.0 0.0 Yeoncheon County (15) 40.0 40.0 0.0 6.7 13.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
80 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
[Table 17-2-1] Reason for being "satisfied' with youth basic income project (1+2+3 priority) – Per respondent characteristics [Base: Respondents who were satisfied with youth basic income of Gyeonggi Province, n=2893, Unit: %] Because Because Because it Because Because it is Because Because Because it is there are no is paid to it helped paid directly online the basic it is paid in conditions all youths respondents to individual application income paid out Gyeonggi for receiving aged 24 to do things youth method is amount is quarterly local youth basic residing in that they instead of convenient not reduced over 4 No. currency income such Gyeonggi had difficulty householder even if the times 1+2+3 priority Others of cases which as being Province doing youths have can be employed or previous such income used like carrying out as leisure, through cash job seeking employment, part-time activities studies and jobs and others others
All (2893) 61.4 56.1 45.7 43.6 32.4 25.0 24.5 10.4 1.0 Male (981) 63.9 49.2 48.9 41.5 32.4 27.2 23.1 12.6 1.0 Gender Female (1912) 60.1 59.5 44.0 44.6 32.4 23.9 25.2 9.3 1.0 High graduate and below (388) 60.3 53.6 43.6 34.3 34.3 29.6 29.6 14.4 0.3 Educational University student (685) 60.6 52.0 45.8 47.2 34.7 24.7 21.9 12.1 1.0 background University graduate and above (1820) 61.9 58.0 46.1 44.2 31.2 24.2 24.4 8.9 1.2 Single (2819) 61.3 55.9 45.7 43.7 32.4 25.1 24.4 10.5 1.0 Marital Married (69) 68.1 60.9 49.3 33.3 33.3 21.7 27.5 5.8 0.0 status Others (5) 40.0 40.0 20.0 80.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 0.0 0.0 1-person household (268) 62.3 46.6 45.9 39.9 37.7 29.9 24.6 12.3 0.7 Married household (25) 72.0 60.0 44.0 28.0 36.0 16.0 40.0 4.0 0.0 Household Lives with children (31) 67.7 67.7 54.8 29.0 35.5 22.6 19.4 3.2 0.0 type Lives with parents (2338) 60.8 56.6 46.0 44.5 32.0 24.6 24.0 10.4 1.2 Others (231) 64.5 58.4 41.6 42.0 29.4 25.5 29.0 9.5 0.0 Student (with part-time job) (284) 59.9 50.0 41.2 47.9 33.8 23.9 32.4 10.2 0.7 Student (without part-time job) (361) 57.3 56.0 49.3 46.5 36.8 24.4 16.3 12.2 1.1 Current Unemployed (765) 59.1 63.1 44.2 47.3 30.3 24.4 22.9 7.8 0.8 identity status Soldier (24) 54.2 66.7 66.7 29.2 29.2 25.0 16.7 12.5 0.0 Employed (1326) 63.7 52.3 46.6 40.3 32.1 25.6 26.5 11.8 1.1 Others (133) 66.9 62.4 41.4 39.8 33.8 26.3 21.1 6.8 1.5 Below KRW 1 million (125) 56.0 52.8 41.6 45.6 40.0 23.2 25.6 14.4 0.8 KRW 1~below 2 million (443) 61.6 50.3 44.7 40.9 35.7 26.9 25.3 13.3 1.4 KRW 2~below 3 million (696) 59.5 56.0 44.0 44.0 30.7 28.4 25.9 10.9 0.6 Household KRW 3~below 4 million (377) 61.5 59.4 45.4 45.9 31.3 23.1 23.6 9.3 0.5 income KRW 4~below 5 million (451) 62.1 58.1 45.2 45.9 31.9 22.4 24.4 8.6 1.3 KRW 5~below 6 million (242) 64.0 55.0 48.8 43.4 33.1 24.4 22.7 7.4 1.2 Above KRW 6 million (559) 63.0 57.6 48.8 41.3 31.1 23.4 23.4 10.0 1.3 High (327) 60.2 54.7 56.3 42.5 30.0 19.9 22.0 14.1 0.3 Standard Mid (1238) 62.6 56.2 44.7 43.5 31.7 25.9 24.1 9.9 1.4 of living Low (1328) 60.5 56.1 44.0 43.8 33.7 25.5 25.5 10.0 0.8
81 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Table 17-2-2] Reason for being "satisfied' with youth basic income project (1+2+3 priority) – Per region of residence [Base: Respondents who were satisfied with youth basic income of Gyeonggi Province, n=2893, Unit: %]
Because Because Because it Because Because it is Because Because the Because it it is paid in there are no is paid to all it helped paid directly online basic income is paid out Gyeonggi conditions youths aged respondents to individual application amount is not quarterly local for receiving 24 residing to do things youth method is reduced even over 4 currency youth basic in Gyeonggi that they had instead of convenient if the youths times No. 1+2+3 priority which can income such Province difficulty doing householder have income Others of cases be used as being previous such through part- like cash employed or as leisure, time jobs and carrying out employment, others job seeking studies and activities others
All (City) (2893) 61.4 56.0 45.7 43.6 32.4 25.0 24.5 10.4 1.0 Suwon (299) 58.9 60.2 44.8 43.8 32.4 27.1 23.7 8.0 1.0 Seongnam (209) 61.2 51.7 50.2 45.5 31.6 23.9 22.0 12.0 1.9 Bucheon (219) 63.0 53.4 44.7 48.9 36.5 26.9 14.6 11.4 0.5 Anyang (148) 57.4 50.0 53.4 41.9 27.0 25.7 30.4 14.2 0.0 Ansan (211) 69.7 50.7 36.0 55.5 35.1 22.7 21.3 8.5 0.5 Yongin (211) 56.9 62.1 42.2 46.4 26.1 27.0 28.9 10.0 0.5 Pyeongtaek (103) 63.1 57.3 38.8 40.8 34.0 25.2 30.1 10.7 0.0 Gwangmyeong (80) 66.3 50.0 41.3 47.5 27.5 26.3 28.8 8.8 3.8 Siheung (124) 65.3 56.5 44.4 42.7 29.0 22.6 26.6 10.5 2.4 Gunpo (72) 59.7 56.9 45.8 41.7 30.6 23.6 25.0 15.3 1.4 Hwaseong (123) 57.7 55.3 45.5 47.2 39.0 21.1 26.8 5.7 1.6 Icheon (30) 73.3 43.3 60.0 23.3 50.0 10.0 23.3 16.7 0.0 Gimpo (69) 60.9 52.2 52.2 37.7 42.0 23.2 23.2 8.7 0.0 Gwangju (66) 57.6 53.0 53.0 36.4 27.3 33.3 24.2 15.2 0.0 Anseong (31) 54.8 58.1 41.9 38.7 35.5 19.4 41.9 9.7 0.0 Region of Hanam (36) 69.4 38.9 63.9 41.7 36.1 30.6 8.3 5.6 5.6 residence Uiwang (40) 60.0 62.5 42.5 25.0 35.0 42.5 22.5 10.0 0.0 Osan (41) 65.9 53.7 41.5 36.6 46.3 29.3 14.6 12.2 0.0 Gwacheon (17) 70.6 52.9 47.1 29.4 47.1 17.6 23.5 11.8 0.0 Yeoju (18) 61.1 66.7 55.6 33.3 11.1 33.3 27.8 11.1 0.0 Yangpyeong County (16) 68.8 43.8 37.5 43.8 25.0 31.3 31.3 18.8 0.0 Goyang (233) 59.7 65.2 45.1 39.5 27.5 24.5 26.6 10.3 1.7 Uijeongbu (106) 63.2 46.2 55.7 41.5 37.7 21.7 19.8 12.3 1.9 Namyangju (140) 57.1 57.9 50.0 44.3 33.6 22.1 23.6 10.0 1.4 Paju (83) 56.6 67.5 39.8 39.8 28.9 28.9 30.1 8.4 0.0 Guri (42) 52.4 57.1 47.6 57.1 26.2 19.0 31.0 9.5 0.0 Pocheon (26) 76.9 50.0 42.3 34.6 23.1 19.2 34.6 19.2 0.0 Yangju (45) 66.7 66.7 37.8 46.7 31.1 28.9 22.2 0.0 0.0 Dongducheon (21) 61.9 47.6 23.8 38.1 42.9 23.8 42.9 19.0 0.0 Gapyeong County (19) 57.9 63.2 68.4 31.6 52.6 10.5 10.5 5.3 0.0 Yeoncheon County (15) 73.3 46.7 53.3 20.0 33.3 26.7 20.0 26.7 0.0
82 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
Reason for being “dissatisfied” with 4-2 youth basic income project (priority)
What is the reason you are dissatisfied with the youth basic income project of Q Gyeonggi Province? Please select up to 3 in order.
As for the reason the respondents were dissatisfied with the youth basic income project (n=117), ‘Because it is only paid to youths aged 24 out of the youth group' was the highest with 23.9% followed by ‘Because Gyeonggi local currency can't be used in supermarkets, department stores and entertainment stores' (18.8%) and 'Because the currency can't be used in the main area of activity in case the area of activity differed from the region of residence' (10.3%).
[Figure 33] Reason for being "dissatisfied' with youth basic income project (priority)
[Base: Respondents who were satisfied with youth basic income of Gyeonggi Province, n=117, Unit: %]
1st priority 57.3 1+2+3 priority 47.9 47.9 44.4 41.9 32.5
23.9 27.4 18.8 17.1 10.3 8.5 7.7 2.6 6.0 5.1 0.9
Because it is Because Because the Because it Because the Because the local Because Because there Others only paid to Gyeonggi local currency can't is paid out amount is not currency can be online is a restriction youths aged currency can't be used in quarterly enough to help exchanged with application is in residence 24 out of the be used in the main area over 4 times life cash through inconvenient condition such youth group supermarkets, of activity in and because cousins or as 3 years department case the area applications acquaintances of residence stores, of activity had to be made which could regarding the entertainment differed from each time damage the recipient stores and others the region of initiative of the residence local currency
Analysis per characteristics
● As for the response, 'Because it is only paid to youths aged 24 out of the youth group' per respondent characteristics, it was relatively high in female, below high school graduate. (based on 1st priority)
83 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Table 18-1-1] Reason for being "dissatisfied' with youth basic income project (1st priority) – Per respondent characteristics [Base: Respondents who were satisfied with youth basic income of Gyeonggi Province, n=117, Unit: %]
Because it Because Because the Because Because it Because the Because is only paid Gyeonggi local currency the is paid out local currency online to youths currency can't can't be used amount quarterly can be application aged 24 be used in in the main is not over 4 times exchanged with is out of supermarkets, area of activity enough to and because cash through inconvenient No. 1st priority the youth department in case the help life applications cousins or Others of cases group stores, area of activity had to be acquaintances entertainment differed from made each which could stores and the region of time damage the others residence initiative of the local currency
All (117) 23.9 18.8 10.3 8.5 7.7 2.6 0.9 27.4
Male (58) 22.4 12.1 6.9 3.4 13.8 1.7 1.7 37.9 Gender Female (59) 25.4 25.4 13.6 13.6 1.7 3.4 0.0 16.9
High graduate and below (15) 33.3 6.7 6.7 13.3 20.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 Educational University student (43) 14.0 25.6 14.0 9.3 7.0 2.3 0.0 27.9 background University graduate and above (59) 28.8 16.9 8.5 6.8 5.1 3.4 1.7 28.8
Marital Single (115) 24.3 19.1 10.4 8.7 7.8 2.6 0.9 26.1 status Married (2) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0
1-person household (15) 26.7 20.0 26.7 6.7 6.7 0.0 0.0 13.3
Household Lives with children (2) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 type Lives with parents (93) 23.7 19.4 8.6 7.5 7.5 3.2 1.1 29.0
Others (7) 28.6 14.3 0.0 28.6 14.3 0.0 0.0 14.3
Student (with part-time job) (15) 13.3 26.7 13.3 0.0 6.7 6.7 0.0 33.3
Student (without part-time job) (25) 4.0 32.0 20.0 12.0 8.0 0.0 0.0 24.0
Current Unemployed (35) 37.1 17.1 5.7 8.6 2.9 2.9 0.0 25.7 identity status Soldier (2) 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Employed (36) 25.0 8.3 8.3 8.3 13.9 2.8 2.8 30.6
Others (4) 25.0 25.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.0
Below KRW 1 million (10) 30.0 10.0 20.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 30.0
KRW 1~below 2 million (13) 23.1 23.1 15.4 15.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.1
KRW 2~below 3 million (19) 31.6 31.6 0.0 10.5 15.8 0.0 0.0 10.5 Household KRW 3~below 4 million (19) 31.6 21.1 10.5 0.0 5.3 0.0 0.0 31.6 income KRW 4~below 5 million (14) 7.1 21.4 0.0 28.6 7.1 0.0 0.0 35.7
KRW 5~below 6 million (11) 9.1 18.2 0.0 9.1 9.1 9.1 0.0 45.5
Above KRW 6 million (31) 25.8 9.7 19.4 3.2 6.5 6.5 3.2 25.8
High (24) 25.0 8.3 12.5 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 37.5 Standard Mid (40) 22.5 10.0 12.5 10.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 35.0 of living Low (53) 24.5 30.2 7.5 9.4 11.3 0.0 0.0 17.0
84 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
[Table 18-1-2] Reason for being "dissatisfied' with youth basic income project (1st priority) – Per region of residence [Base: Respondents who were satisfied with youth basic income of Gyeonggi Province, n=117, Unit: %]
Because it is Because Because the Because Because it Because the Because only paid to Gyeonggi local currency can't the amount is paid out local currency online youths aged currency can't be used in is not quarterly can be application is 24 out of the be used in the main area enough to over 4 times exchanged with inconvenient youth group supermarkets, of activity in help life and because cash through No. 1st priority department case the area applications cousins or Others of cases stores, of activity had to be made acquaintances entertainment differed from each time which could stores and the region of damage the others residence initiative of the local currency
All (City) (117) 23.9 18.8 10.3 8.5 7.7 2.6 0.9 27.4 Suwon (6) 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 Seongnam (9) 11.1 22.2 11.1 22.2 22.2 0.0 11.1 0.0 Bucheon (9) 55.6 0.0 0.0 11.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 33.3 Anyang (6) 33.3 33.3 33.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ansan (6) 33.3 16.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.7 0.0 33.3 Yongin (19) 10.5 26.3 21.1 10.5 15.8 0.0 0.0 15.8 Pyeongtaek (1) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Gwangmyeong (5) 60.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 Siheung (3) 33.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 66.7 Gunpo (2) 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Hwaseong (4) 25.0 25.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.0 Icheon (1) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Gimpo (2) 0.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 Region Gwangju (4) 0.0 50.0 25.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 of residence Anseong (1) 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Hanam (4) 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 0.0 25.0 Uiwang (3) 66.7 0.0 33.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Osan (1) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Gwacheon (1) 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Goyang (8) 0.0 12.5 0.0 0.0 12.5 0.0 0.0 75.0 Uijeongbu (4) 25.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 Namyangju (5) 40.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 Paju (3) 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Guri (5) 20.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 60.0 Pocheon (2) 50.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Dongducheon (1) 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Gapyeong County (1) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Yeoncheon County (1) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0
85 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Table 18-2-1] Reason for being "dissatisfied' with youth basic income project (1+2+3 priority) – Per respondent characteristics [Base: Respondents who were satisfied with youth basic income of Gyeonggi Province, n=117, Unit %]
Because Because Because the Because it Because Because Because Because it is only Gyeonggi local currency is paid out the the local online there is a paid to currency can't can't be quarterly amount currency can application is restriction youths be used in used in the over 4 is not be exchanged inconvenient in residence aged 24 supermarkets, main area times and enough to with cash condition No. out of department of activity in because help life through such as 3 1+2+3 priority Others of cases the youth stores, case the area applications cousins or years of group entertainment of activity had to be acquaintances residence stores and differed from made each which could regarding others the region of time damage the the residence initiative of the recipient local currency
All (117) 57.3 47.9 47.9 44.4 32.5 17.1 6.0 5.1 41.9
Male (58) 46.6 41.4 43.1 51.7 29.3 20.7 10.3 8.6 48.3 Gender Female (59) 67.8 54.2 52.5 37.3 35.6 13.6 1.7 1.7 35.6
High graduate and below (15) 60.0 53.3 33.3 46.7 53.3 6.7 20.0 0.0 26.7 Educational University student (43) 62.8 37.2 51.2 46.5 37.2 23.3 4.7 0.0 37.2 background University graduate and above (59) 52.5 54.2 49.2 42.4 23.7 15.3 3.4 10.2 49.2
Marital Single (115) 57.4 48.7 48.7 44.3 32.2 16.5 6.1 5.2 40.9 status Married (2) 50.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 100.0
1-person household (15) 66.7 53.3 46.7 60.0 26.7 13.3 0.0 0.0 33.3
Household Lives with children (2) 50.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 type Lives with parents (93) 57.0 49.5 48.4 39.8 32.3 18.3 6.5 6.5 41.9
Others (7) 42.9 28.6 57.1 71.4 42.9 0.0 14.3 0.0 42.9
Student (with part-time job) (15) 53.3 26.7 66.7 53.3 13.3 33.3 0.0 6.7 46.7
Student (without part-time job) (25) 76.0 44.0 56.0 32.0 28.0 20.0 8.0 0.0 36.0
Current Unemployed (35) 45.7 54.3 45.7 48.6 48.6 11.4 5.7 2.9 37.1 identity status Soldier (2) 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Employed (36) 52.8 52.8 41.7 38.9 30.6 16.7 8.3 11.1 47.2
Others (4) 75.0 25.0 25.0 75.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 75.0
Below KRW 1 million (10) 60.0 70.0 30.0 40.0 40.0 10.0 10.0 0.0 40.0
KRW 1~below 2 million (13) 69.2 46.2 38.5 23.1 53.8 23.1 0.0 7.7 38.5
KRW 2~below 3 million (19) 63.2 63.2 36.8 52.6 31.6 10.5 5.3 5.3 31.6 Household KRW 3~below 4 million (19) 57.9 47.4 57.9 47.4 21.1 10.5 5.3 5.3 47.4 income KRW 4~below 5 million (14) 64.3 42.9 42.9 35.7 50.0 7.1 7.1 7.1 42.9
KRW 5~below 6 million (11) 45.5 36.4 45.5 36.4 36.4 36.4 0.0 0.0 63.6
Above KRW 6 million (31) 48.4 38.7 61.3 54.8 19.4 22.6 9.7 6.5 38.7
High (24) 41.7 45.8 45.8 58.3 25.0 25.0 8.3 4.2 45.8 Standard Mid (40) 57.5 50.0 50.0 35.0 27.5 27.5 5.0 2.5 45.0 of living Low (53) 64.2 47.2 47.2 45.3 39.6 5.7 5.7 7.5 37.7
86 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
[Table 18-2-2] Reason for being "dissatisfied' with youth basic income project (1+2+3 priority) – Pee region of residence [Base: Respondents who were satisfied with youth basic income of Gyeonggi Province, n=117, Unit: %]
Because Because Because the Because it Because Because the Because Because it is only Gyeonggi local currency is paid out the local currency online there is a paid to currency can't can't be quarterly amount can be application is restriction youths be used in used in the over 4 times is not exchanged with inconvenient in residence aged 24 supermarkets, main area and because enough to cash through condition No. 1+2+3 priority out of department of activity in applications help life cousins or such as 3 Others of cases the youth stores, case the area had to be acquaintances years of group entertainment of activity made each which could residence stores and differed from time damage the regarding others the region of initiative of the the residence local currency recipient
All (City) (117) 57.3 47.9 47.9 44.4 32.5 17.1 6.0 5.1 41.9 Suwon (6) 50.0 50.0 50.0 16.7 33.3 33.3 0.0 0.0 66.7 Seongnam (9) 66.7 44.4 33.3 66.7 33.3 11.1 22.2 11.1 11.1 Bucheon (9) 44.4 88.9 44.4 66.7 22.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 33.3 Anyang (6) 83.3 50.0 66.7 33.3 33.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 33.3 Ansan (6) 50.0 66.7 50.0 16.7 0.0 33.3 0.0 0.0 83.3 Yongin (19) 68.4 36.8 52.6 47.4 36.8 21.1 10.5 5.3 21.1 Pyeongtaek (1) 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Gwangmyeong (5) 40.0 60.0 80.0 40.0 40.0 20.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 Siheung (3) 0.0 33.3 33.3 66.7 66.7 33.3 0.0 0.0 66.7 Gunpo (2) 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 Hwaseong (4) 50.0 25.0 50.0 75.0 75.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.0 Icheon (1) 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Gimpo (2) 50.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 100.0 Region Gwangju (4) 100.0 25.0 100.0 0.0 50.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 of residence Anseong (1) 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Hanam (4) 25.0 50.0 50.0 75.0 25.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 Uiwang (3) 33.3 66.7 33.3 66.7 0.0 66.7 0.0 0.0 33.3 Osan (1) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Gwacheon (1) 0.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Goyang (8) 75.0 62.5 0.0 37.5 25.0 12.5 0.0 0.0 87.5 Uijeongbu (4) 75.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 25.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 75.0 Namyangju (5) 60.0 60.0 60.0 40.0 20.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 40.0 Paju (3) 66.7 0.0 100.0 66.7 33.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 33.3 Guri (5) 40.0 60.0 20.0 40.0 20.0 20.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 Pocheon (2) 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Dongducheon (1) 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Gapyeong County (1) 100.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Yeoncheon County (1) 100.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0
87 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
5 Opinions regarding expansion of youth basic income project
The question is about the expansion of Gyeonggi Province’s youth basic income Q project. Please respond accordingly regarding the following opinion.
As for the opinion on expansion of Gyeonggi Province’s youth basic income, ‘Payment of youth basic income should be expanded to other regions (cities and provinces) other than Gyeonggi Province was the highest with 69.45 points followed by ’Basic income such as youth basic income should be expanded and applied to specific groups such as the disabled, farmers and artists‘ (66.19 points) and ’Youth basic income must not be restricted to the age of 24 and the youth age group must be expanded‘ (65.05 points).
[Figure 34] Opinions regarding expansion of youth basic income project [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: Point]
69.45
65.05 66.19
Youth basic income should not Payment of youth basic income Basic income such as youth basic be restricted to the age of 24 and must be implemented in other income must be expanded and the youth age group must be regions (cities and provinces) other applied to specific groups such as expanded than Gyeonggi Province the disabled, farmers and artists
88 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
[Table 19-1] Opinions regarding expansion of youth basic income project – Per respondent characteristics [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: Point]
Youth basic income Payment of youth Basic income such as should not be restricted basic income must be youth basic income must No. to the age of 24 and implemented in other be expanded and applied to of cases the youth age group regions (cities and specific groups such as the must be expanded provinces) other than disabled, farmers Gyeonggi Province and artists
All (3500) 65.05 69.45 66.19
Male (1221) 63.04 66.89 63.57 Gender Female (2279) 66.13 70.82 67.60
High graduate and below (500) 74.70 75.35 71.55 Educational University student (826) 61.20 66.40 63.47 background University graduate and above (2174) 64.29 69.25 66.00
Single (3414) 64.89 69.30 66.15 Marital Married (79) 71.52 74.68 65.82 status Others (7) 67.86 82.14 89.29
1-person household (324) 65.97 71.30 66.36
Married household (27) 71.30 78.70 61.11 Household Lives with children (37) 71.62 72.30 67.57 type Lives with parents (2846) 64.47 69.11 66.17
Others (266) 68.61 69.45 66.54
Student (with part-time job) (327) 63.91 69.65 65.60
Student (without part-time job) (438) 59.65 66.04 62.90
Current Unemployed (934) 65.69 70.16 67.34 identity status Soldier (32) 53.91 57.03 53.13 Employed (1607) 66.32 69.96 66.55
Others (162) 67.90 71.60 68.67
Below KRW 1 million (175) 67.00 67.14 66.00
KRW 1~below 2 million (546) 70.19 72.12 69.32
KRW 2~below 3 million (842) 66.78 71.38 67.99 Household KRW 3~below 4 million (450) 65.17 69.61 64.00 income KRW 4~below 5 million (522) 64.61 69.83 67.34
KRW 5~below 6 million (291) 62.89 67.87 64.95
Above KRW 6 million (674) 59.42 65.76 62.57
High (398) 56.09 63.44 61.24 Standard Mid (1476) 63.80 68.53 65.06 of living Low (1626) 68.37 71.76 68.43
89 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Table 19-2] Opinions regarding expansion of youth basic income project – Per region of residence
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: Point]
Youth basic income Payment of youth Basic income such as should not be restricted basic income must be youth basic income must No. to the age of 24 and implemented in other be expanded and applied of cases the youth age group regions (cities and to specific groups such as must be expanded provinces) other than the disabled, farmers Gyeonggi Province and artists
All (City) (3500) 65.05 69.45 66.19
Suwon (363) 64.19 67.56 62.67
Seongnam (254) 56.89 67.42 63.58
Bucheon (261) 65.23 66.86 65.61
Anyang (185) 62.43 69.05 65.68
Ansan (239) 67.89 72.28 65.69
Yongin (270) 62.31 67.69 62.69
Pyeongtaek (131) 66.22 70.23 69.27
Gwangmyeong (96) 69.27 69.79 68.49
Siheung (144) 67.88 72.74 70.83
Gunpo (84) 64.29 65.48 69.35
Hwaseong (155) 67.10 70.65 66.45
Icheon (39) 65.38 65.38 64.10
Gimpo (85) 64.71 66.18 67.06
Gwangju (86) 62.50 70.64 67.73
Anseong (37) 64.19 70.95 58.78 Region of Hanam (43) 64.53 62.79 58.72 residence Uiwang (46) 64.13 70.11 62.50
Osan (53) 66.51 72.17 67.45
Gwacheon (20) 65.00 62.50 57.50
Yeoju (20) 70.00 66.25 58.75
Yangpyeong County (20) 72.50 61.25 75.00
Goyang (280) 64.91 70.63 67.68
Uijeongbu (130) 65.00 71.15 66.54
Namyangju (160) 69.69 74.84 72.81
Paju (96) 68.75 72.40 66.93
Guri (54) 68.06 76.39 73.61
Pocheon (35) 70.71 67.86 70.71
Yangju (48) 65.63 67.71 67.71
Dongducheon (26) 71.15 75.00 66.35
Gapyeong County (20) 63.75 66.25 76.25
Yeoncheon County (20) 70.00 71.25 63.75
90 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
1) Age group should be expanded instead of restricting to the age of 24
As for the question on whether the youth basic income should not be restricted to the age of 24 and the age group has to be expanded, 60.0% responded by saying ‘Agree’ (Fully agree: 24.9% + Agree: 35.2%) which was higher than 18.3% who responded by saying ‘Do not agree’ (Do not agree: 12.0% + Do not agree at all: 6.3%).
[Figure 35] Age group should be expanded instead of restricting to the age of 24
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
Do not Agree agree
Do not 35.2 agree Average 18.3% 65.05 out 24.9 Agree 21.6 60.0% of 100 points Average 12.0 21.6% 6.3
Do not Do not Average Agree Fully agree at all agree agree
Analysis per characteristics
● As for the response, ‘Agree’ per respondent characteristics, it was relatively high in female, under high school graduates and with lower standard of living.
● As for the response, ‘Agree’ per region of residence, Dongducheon City (n=26) was the highest with 73.1% followed by Pocheon City (71.4%) and Gwangmyeong City (70.8%).
91 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Table 20-1] Age group should be expanded instead of restricting to the age of 24 – Per respondent characteristics [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
Don't [Average No. of Don't Fully [Do not agree Average Agree [Average] [Agree] converted cases agree agree agree] at all to 100 pts]
All (3500) 6.3 12.0 21.6 35.2 24.9 18.3 21.6 60.0 65.05
Male (1221) 10.2 11.3 21.4 30.2 26.9 21.5 21.4 57.1 63.04 Gender Female (2279) 4.3 12.4 21.8 37.8 23.8 16.6 21.8 61.6 66.13
High graduate and below (500) 3.0 6.0 17.2 36.8 37.0 9.0 17.2 73.8 74.70 Educational University student (826) 9.4 12.8 23.7 31.5 22.5 22.3 23.7 54.0 61.20 background University graduate and above (2174) 5.9 13.1 21.8 36.2 23.0 19.0 21.8 59.2 64.29
Single (3414) 6.4 12.1 21.6 35.2 24.6 18.5 21.6 59.9 64.89 Marital Married (79) 3.8 6.3 24.1 31.6 34.2 10.1 24.1 65.8 71.52 status Others (7) 0.0 28.6 0.0 42.9 28.6 28.6 0.0 71.4 67.86
1-person household (324) 9.0 9.9 17.6 35.5 28.1 18.8 17.6 63.6 65.97
Married household (27) 0.0 11.1 25.9 29.6 33.3 11.1 25.9 63.0 71.30 Household Lives with children (37) 5.4 5.4 21.6 32.4 35.1 10.8 21.6 67.6 71.62 type Lives with parents (2846) 6.3 12.5 22.1 35.0 24.0 18.8 22.1 59.0 64.47
Others (266) 4.1 10.2 20.7 37.2 27.8 14.3 20.7 65.0 68.61
Student (with part-time job) (327) 8.0 11.9 22.0 32.7 25.4 19.9 22.0 58.1 63.91
Student (without part-time job) (438) 11.2 14.2 19.9 34.5 20.3 25.3 19.9 54.8 59.65
Current Unemployed (934) 4.7 10.9 24.6 36.4 23.3 15.6 24.6 59.7 65.69 identity status Soldier (32) 12.5 18.8 25.0 28.1 15.6 31.3 25.0 43.8 53.91
Employed (1607) 5.5 12.3 20.3 35.0 26.8 17.9 20.3 61.9 66.32
Others (162) 6.2 8.0 21.0 37.7 27.2 14.2 21.0 64.8 67.90
Below KRW 1 million (175) 6.9 7.4 23.4 35.4 26.9 14.3 23.4 62.3 67.00
KRW 1~below 2 million (546) 4.0 9.5 19.2 36.1 31.1 13.6 19.2 67.2 70.19
KRW 2~below 3 million (842) 4.6 11.9 21.6 35.5 26.4 16.5 21.6 61.9 66.78 Household KRW 3~below 4 million (450) 6.0 12.4 20.9 36.2 24.4 18.4 20.9 60.7 65.17 income KRW 4~below 5 million (522) 6.5 11.3 22.6 36.4 23.2 17.8 22.6 59.6 64.61
KRW 5~below 6 million (291) 7.9 10.3 24.7 36.4 20.6 18.2 24.7 57.0 62.89
Above KRW 6 million (674) 9.6 16.3 21.5 31.8 20.8 26.0 21.5 52.5 59.42
High (398) 12.6 17.8 21.9 28.1 19.6 30.4 21.9 47.7 56.09 Standard Mid (1476) 6.2 12.2 23.0 37.2 21.3 18.4 23.0 58.5 63.80 of living Low (1626) 4.9 10.4 20.3 35.1 29.3 15.3 20.3 64.4 68.37
92 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
[Table 20-2] Age group should be expanded instead of restricting to the age of 24 – Per region of residence [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
Don't [Average No. of Don't Fully [Do not agree Average Agree [Average] [Agree] converted cases agree agree agree] at all to 100 pts]
All (City) (3500) 6.3 12.0 21.6 35.2 24.9 18.3 21.6 60.0 65.05
Suwon (363) 6.6 13.2 18.7 39.7 21.8 19.8 18.7 61.4 64.19
Seongnam (254) 6.7 18.9 29.1 30.7 14.6 25.6 29.1 45.3 56.89
Bucheon (261) 6.9 10.7 24.1 31.0 27.2 17.6 24.1 58.2 65.23
Anyang (185) 5.9 15.1 22.2 36.8 20.0 21.1 22.2 56.8 62.43
Ansan (239) 5.0 9.6 22.6 34.3 28.5 14.6 22.6 62.8 67.89
Yongin (270) 8.1 11.1 26.7 31.5 22.6 19.3 26.7 54.1 62.31
Pyeongtaek (131) 6.1 11.5 21.4 33.6 27.5 17.6 21.4 61.1 66.22
Gwangmyeong (96) 6.3 8.3 14.6 43.8 27.1 14.6 14.6 70.8 69.27
Siheung (144) 4.9 12.5 17.4 36.8 28.5 17.4 17.4 65.3 67.88
Gunpo (84) 9.5 8.3 20.2 39.3 22.6 17.9 20.2 61.9 64.29
Hwaseong (155) 6.5 11.0 16.8 39.4 26.5 17.4 16.8 65.8 67.10
Icheon (39) 5.1 7.7 28.2 38.5 20.5 12.8 28.2 59.0 65.38
Gimpo (85) 7.1 12.9 17.6 38.8 23.5 20.0 17.6 62.4 64.71
Gwangju (86) 4.7 15.1 24.4 37.2 18.6 19.8 24.4 55.8 62.50
Anseong (37) 5.4 13.5 18.9 43.2 18.9 18.9 18.9 62.2 64.19 Region of Hanam (43) 7.0 14.0 14.0 44.2 20.9 20.9 14.0 65.1 64.53 residence Uiwang (46) 13.0 6.5 17.4 37.0 26.1 19.6 17.4 63.0 64.13
Osan (53) 5.7 9.4 22.6 37.7 24.5 15.1 22.6 62.3 66.51
Gwacheon (20) 5.0 10.0 30.0 30.0 25.0 15.0 30.0 55.0 65.00
Yeoju (20) 10.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 45.0 20.0 15.0 65.0 70.00
Yangpyeong County (20) 0.0 10.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 10.0 25.0 65.0 72.50
Goyang (280) 8.6 12.5 18.9 30.7 29.3 21.1 18.9 60.0 64.91
Uijeongbu (130) 7.7 13.1 18.5 33.1 27.7 20.8 18.5 60.8 65.00
Namyangju (160) 4.4 10.0 18.1 37.5 30.0 14.4 18.1 67.5 69.69
Paju (96) 1.0 10.4 27.1 35.4 26.0 11.5 27.1 61.5 68.75
Guri (54) 5.6 11.1 16.7 38.9 27.8 16.7 16.7 66.7 68.06
Pocheon (35) 2.9 14.3 11.4 40.0 31.4 17.1 11.4 71.4 70.71
Yangju (48) 2.1 8.3 41.7 20.8 27.1 10.4 41.7 47.9 65.63
Dongducheon (26) 3.8 7.7 15.4 46.2 26.9 11.5 15.4 73.1 71.15
Gapyeong County (20) 5.0 5.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 40.0 50.0 63.75
Yeoncheon County (20) 5.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 35.0 15.0 20.0 65.0 70.00
93 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
2) It should be expanded to other regions other than Gyeonggi Province
As for the question on whether youth basic income had to be expanded to other regions other than Gyeonggi Province, 66.8% responded by saying ‘Agree’ (Fully agree: 26.5% + Agree: 40.3%) which was higher than 10.6% who responded by saying ‘Do not agree’ (Do not agree: 5.7% + Do not agree at all: 4.9%).
[Figure 36] It should be expanded to other regions other than Gyeonggi Province
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
Do not Agree agree Do not agree 40.3 10.6% Average 26.5 Agree 69.45 out 66.8% of 100 Average 22.6 points 22.6%
4.9 5.7
Do not Do not Average Agree Fully agree agree at all agree
Analysis per characteristics
● As for the response, ‘Agree’ per respondent characteristics, it was relatively high in female, under high school graduates and with lower standard of living.
● As for the response, ‘Agree’ per region of residence, Guri City was the highest with 81.5% followed by Dongducheon City (80.8%, n=26 and Siheung City (72.9%).
94 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
[Table 21-1] It should be expanded to other regions other than Gyeonggi Province – Per respondent characteristics [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
Don't [Average No. of Don't Fully [Do not agree Average Agree [Average] [Agree] converted cases agree agree agree] at all to 100 pts]
All (3500) 4.9 5.7 22.6 40.3 26.5 10.6 22.6 66.8 69.45
Male (1221) 9.0 5.7 21.8 35.6 27.8 14.7 21.8 63.5 66.89 Gender Female (2279) 2.7 5.7 23.0 42.7 25.8 8.4 23.0 68.6 70.82
High graduate and below (500) 2.0 4.2 20.2 37.6 36.0 6.2 20.2 73.6 75.35 Educational University student (826) 8.4 6.3 21.7 38.7 24.9 14.6 21.7 63.7 66.40 background University graduate and above (2174) 4.3 5.8 23.5 41.4 25.0 10.1 23.5 66.4 69.25
Single (3414) 5.0 5.8 22.7 40.1 26.4 10.8 22.7 66.5 69.30 Marital Married (79) 2.5 2.5 19.0 45.6 30.4 5.1 19.0 75.9 74.68 status Others (7) 0.0 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 0.0 14.3 85.7 82.14
1-person household (324) 6.5 5.2 18.2 36.7 33.3 11.7 18.2 70.1 71.30
Married household (27) 0.0 3.7 11.1 51.9 33.3 3.7 11.1 85.2 78.70 Household Lives with children (37) 5.4 2.7 21.6 37.8 32.4 8.1 21.6 70.3 72.30 type Lives with parents (2846) 4.8 5.9 23.1 40.6 25.7 10.6 23.1 66.2 69.11
Others (266) 4.9 5.3 23.3 40.2 26.3 10.2 23.3 66.5 69.45
Student (with part-time job) (327) 4.6 8.3 19.3 39.8 28.1 12.8 19.3 67.9 69.65
Student (without part-time job) (438) 10.5 4.8 20.5 38.4 25.8 15.3 20.5 64.2 66.04
Current Unemployed (934) 3.0 4.7 25.3 42.7 24.3 7.7 25.3 67.0 70.16 identity status Soldier (32) 15.6 3.1 31.3 37.5 12.5 18.8 31.3 50.0 57.03
Employed (1607) 4.5 6.3 22.4 38.6 28.3 10.8 22.4 66.8 69.96
Others (162) 3.7 3.7 19.1 49.4 24.1 7.4 19.1 73.5 71.60
Below KRW 1 million (175) 8.0 6.3 21.1 38.3 26.3 14.3 21.1 64.6 67.14
KRW 1~below 2 million (546) 3.8 3.5 22.2 41.4 29.1 7.3 22.2 70.5 72.12
KRW 2~below 3 million (842) 3.2 6.8 21.1 39.1 29.8 10.0 21.1 68.9 71.38 Household KRW 3~below 4 million (450) 4.0 7.1 21.8 40.7 26.4 11.1 21.8 67.1 69.61 income KRW 4~below 5 million (522) 4.6 4.6 23.0 42.5 25.3 9.2 23.0 67.8 69.83
KRW 5~below 6 million (291) 5.8 3.4 26.8 41.2 22.7 9.3 26.8 63.9 67.87
Above KRW 6 million (674) 7.6 7.0 23.4 38.9 23.1 14.5 23.4 62.0 65.76
High (398) 10.1 8.0 22.9 36.2 22.9 18.1 22.9 59.0 63.44 Standard Mid (1476) 4.7 6.0 23.4 41.9 23.8 10.8 23.4 65.8 68.53 of living Low (1626) 3.8 4.9 21.7 39.7 29.9 8.7 21.7 69.6 71.76
95 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Table 21-2] It should be expanded to other regions other than Gyeonggi Province – Per region of residence [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %] Don't [Average No. of Don't Fully [Do not agree Average Agree [Average] [Agree] converted cases agree agree agree] at all to 100 pts]
All (City) (3500) 4.9 5.7 22.6 40.3 26.5 10.6 22.6 66.8 69.45
Suwon (363) 5.5 6.3 22.9 43.0 22.3 11.8 22.9 65.3 67.56
Seongnam (254) 5.1 7.9 22.4 41.3 23.2 13.0 22.4 64.6 67.42
Bucheon (261) 5.4 6.5 24.9 41.8 21.5 11.9 24.9 63.2 66.86
Anyang (185) 3.2 7.6 23.8 40.5 24.9 10.8 23.8 65.4 69.05
Ansan (239) 3.8 6.3 20.1 36.8 33.1 10.0 20.1 69.9 72.28
Yongin (270) 6.7 4.8 27.4 33.3 27.8 11.5 27.4 61.1 67.69
Pyeongtaek (131) 3.8 3.8 26.0 40.5 26.0 7.6 26.0 66.4 70.23
Gwangmyeong (96) 5.2 5.2 20.8 42.7 26.0 10.4 20.8 68.8 69.79
Siheung (144) 2.8 2.8 21.5 46.5 26.4 5.6 21.5 72.9 72.74
Gunpo (84) 9.5 6.0 17.9 46.4 20.2 15.5 17.9 66.7 65.48
Hwaseong (155) 7.1 3.9 16.8 43.9 28.4 11.0 16.8 72.3 70.65
Icheon (39) 5.1 5.1 33.3 35.9 20.5 10.3 33.3 56.4 65.38
Gimpo (85) 7.1 8.2 21.2 40.0 23.5 15.3 21.2 63.5 66.18
Gwangju (86) 3.5 2.3 30.2 36.0 27.9 5.8 30.2 64.0 70.64
Anseong (37) 0.0 2.7 27.0 54.1 16.2 2.7 27.0 70.3 70.95 Region of Hanam (43) 7.0 9.3 25.6 41.9 16.3 16.3 25.6 58.1 62.79 residence Uiwang (46) 10.9 6.5 10.9 34.8 37.0 17.4 10.9 71.7 70.11
Osan (53) 3.8 3.8 24.5 35.8 32.1 7.5 24.5 67.9 72.17
Gwacheon (20) 10.0 5.0 25.0 45.0 15.0 15.0 25.0 60.0 62.50
Yeoju (20) 10.0 5.0 30.0 20.0 35.0 15.0 30.0 55.0 66.25
Yangpyeong County (20) 5.0 10.0 30.0 45.0 10.0 15.0 30.0 55.0 61.25
Goyang (280) 5.0 5.4 20.0 41.4 28.2 10.4 20.0 69.6 70.63
Uijeongbu (130) 5.4 5.4 17.7 42.3 29.2 10.8 17.7 71.5 71.15
Namyangju (160) 2.5 5.6 19.4 35.0 37.5 8.1 19.4 72.5 74.84
Paju (96) 1.0 5.2 25.0 40.6 28.1 6.3 25.0 68.8 72.40
Guri (54) 5.6 1.9 11.1 44.4 37.0 7.4 11.1 81.5 76.39
Pocheon (35) 2.9 8.6 25.7 40.0 22.9 11.4 25.7 62.9 67.86
Yangju (48) 2.1 6.3 37.5 27.1 27.1 8.3 37.5 54.2 67.71
Dongducheon (26) 0.0 7.7 11.5 53.8 26.9 7.7 11.5 80.8 75.00
Gapyeong County (20) 5.0 5.0 30.0 40.0 20.0 10.0 30.0 60.0 66.25
Yeoncheon County (20) 5.0 10.0 20.0 25.0 40.0 15.0 20.0 65.0 71.25
96 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
3) It should be expanded and applied to specific groups such as disabled, farmers and artists
As for the question on whether youth basic income had to be expanded and applied to specific groups such as the disabled, farmers and artists, 61.0% responded by saying ‘Yes’ (Fully agree: 27.0% + Agree: 34.0.%) which was higher than 16.2% who responded by saying ‘Not so’ (Do not agree: 9.2% + Do not agree at all: 7.0%).
[Figure 37] It should be expanded and applied to specific groups such as [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %] disabled, farmers and artists
Do not Agree agree Do not agree 34.0 27.0 16.2% Average 22.8 Agree 66.19 out 61.0% of 100 points Average 22.8% 9.2 7.0
Do not Do not Average Agree Fully agree agree at all agree
Analysis per characteristics
● As for the response, ‘Agree’ per respondent characteristics, it was relatively high in female, under high school graduates and with lower standard of living.
● As for the response, ‘Agree’ per region of residence, Gapyeong County (n=20) was the highest with 80.0% followed by Yangpyeong County (75.0%, n=20) and Siheung City (69.4%).
97 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Table 22-1] It should be expanded and applied to specific groups such as disabled, farmers and artists – Per respondent characteristics [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
Don't [Average No. of Don't Fully [Do not agree Average Agree [Average] [Agree] converted cases agree agree agree] at all to 100 pts]
All (3500) 7.0 9.2 22.8 34.0 27.0 16.2 22.8 61.0 66.19
Male (1221) 11.1 8.5 21.7 32.2 26.5 19.7 21.7 58.6 63.57 Gender Female (2279) 4.8 9.6 23.4 35.0 27.2 14.3 23.4 62.3 67.60
High graduate and below (500) 3.0 7.0 23.6 33.6 32.8 10.0 23.6 66.4 71.55 Educational University student (826) 10.8 8.8 22.2 32.2 26.0 19.6 22.2 58.2 63.47 background University graduate and above (2174) 6.5 9.8 22.9 34.8 26.0 16.3 22.9 60.8 66.00
Single (3414) 7.0 9.2 22.8 34.0 26.9 16.2 22.8 60.9 66.15 Marital Married (79) 7.6 8.9 22.8 34.2 26.6 16.5 22.8 60.8 65.82 status Others (7) 0.0 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 0.0 0.0 100.0 89.29
1-person household (324) 8.0 9.6 19.8 34.3 28.4 17.6 19.8 62.7 66.36
Married household (27) 7.4 18.5 22.2 25.9 25.9 25.9 22.2 51.9 61.11 Household Lives with children (37) 8.1 2.7 24.3 40.5 24.3 10.8 24.3 64.9 67.57 type Lives with parents (2846) 6.8 9.2 23.3 33.8 26.8 16.0 23.3 60.6 66.17
Others (266) 7.9 8.3 20.7 36.1 27.1 16.2 20.7 63.2 66.54
Student (with part-time job) (327) 7.3 11.6 19.0 35.5 26.6 19.0 19.0 62.1 65.60
Student (without part-time job) (438) 12.1 8.9 20.8 31.7 26.5 21.0 20.8 58.2 62.90
Current Unemployed (934) 4.9 8.8 25.7 33.2 27.4 13.7 25.7 60.6 67.34 identity status Soldier (32) 18.8 6.3 28.1 37.5 9.4 25.0 28.1 46.9 53.13
Employed (1607) 6.5 9.5 22.3 34.5 27.1 16.1 22.3 61.7 66.55
Others (162) 6.8 4.9 23.5 36.4 28.4 11.7 23.5 64.8 68.67
Below KRW 1 million (175) 7.4 6.9 27.4 30.9 27.4 14.3 27.4 58.3 66.00
KRW 1~below 2 million (546) 4.6 9.3 21.6 33.2 31.3 13.9 21.6 64.5 69.32
KRW 2~below 3 million (842) 5.7 7.7 23.5 35.0 28.0 13.4 23.5 63.1 67.99 Household KRW 3~below 4 million (450) 8.7 9.6 21.6 37.6 22.7 18.2 21.6 60.2 64.00 income KRW 4~below 5 million (522) 6.5 7.9 23.8 33.5 28.4 14.4 23.8 61.9 67.34
KRW 5~below 6 million (291) 6.5 11.3 24.1 32.0 26.1 17.9 24.1 58.1 64.95
Above KRW 6 million (674) 9.9 11.4 21.2 33.2 24.2 21.4 21.2 57.4 62.57
High (398) 12.6 12.1 18.8 30.9 25.6 24.6 18.8 56.5 61.24 Standard Mid (1476) 6.5 10.4 23.6 35.2 24.3 16.9 23.6 59.4 65.06 of living Low (1626) 6.1 7.4 23.0 33.8 29.8 13.5 23.0 63.5 68.43
98 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
[Table 22-2] It should be expanded and applied to specific groups such as disabled, farmers and artists – Per region of residence [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
Don't [Average No. of Don't Fully [Do not agree Average Agree [Average] [Agree] converted cases agree agree agree] at all to 100 pts]
All (City) (3500) 7.0 9.2 22.8 34.0 27.0 16.2 22.8 61.0 66.19
Suwon (363) 8.0 12.4 22.9 34.4 22.3 20.4 22.9 56.7 62.67
Seongnam (254) 7.5 11.4 23.2 35.0 22.8 18.9 23.2 57.9 63.58
Bucheon (261) 6.1 10.0 23.8 35.6 24.5 16.1 23.8 60.2 65.61
Anyang (185) 5.4 11.4 23.8 34.1 25.4 16.8 23.8 59.5 65.68
Ansan (239) 7.9 9.6 21.8 33.1 27.6 17.6 21.8 60.7 65.69
Yongin (270) 9.6 8.9 27.8 28.5 25.2 18.5 27.8 53.7 62.69
Pyeongtaek (131) 5.3 5.3 24.4 36.6 28.2 10.7 24.4 64.9 69.27
Gwangmyeong (96) 7.3 6.3 17.7 42.7 26.0 13.5 17.7 68.8 68.49
Siheung (144) 5.6 6.3 18.8 38.2 31.3 11.8 18.8 69.4 70.83
Gunpo (84) 6.0 7.1 20.2 36.9 29.8 13.1 20.2 66.7 69.35
Hwaseong (155) 9.7 10.3 12.9 38.7 28.4 20.0 12.9 67.1 66.45
Icheon (39) 5.1 12.8 25.6 33.3 23.1 17.9 25.6 56.4 64.10
Gimpo (85) 8.2 5.9 23.5 34.1 28.2 14.1 23.5 62.4 67.06
Gwangju (86) 4.7 7.0 26.7 36.0 25.6 11.6 26.7 61.6 67.73
Anseong (37) 2.7 24.3 29.7 21.6 21.6 27.0 29.7 43.2 58.78 Region of Hanam (43) 14.0 14.0 18.6 30.2 23.3 27.9 18.6 53.5 58.72 residence Uiwang (46) 17.4 4.3 13.0 41.3 23.9 21.7 13.0 65.2 62.50
Osan (53) 3.8 9.4 18.9 49.1 18.9 13.2 18.9 67.9 67.45
Gwacheon (20) 15.0 10.0 20.0 40.0 15.0 25.0 20.0 55.0 57.50
Yeoju (20) 10.0 15.0 25.0 30.0 20.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 58.75
Yangpyeong County (20) 0.0 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 75.00
Goyang (280) 8.6 6.1 23.6 29.6 32.1 14.6 23.6 61.8 67.68
Uijeongbu (130) 4.6 13.1 23.1 30.0 29.2 17.7 23.1 59.2 66.54
Namyangju (160) 4.4 5.6 22.5 29.4 38.1 10.0 22.5 67.5 72.81
Paju (96) 3.1 9.4 29.2 33.3 25.0 12.5 29.2 58.3 66.93
Guri (54) 5.6 7.4 18.5 24.1 44.4 13.0 18.5 68.5 73.61
Pocheon (35) 2.9 8.6 22.9 34.3 31.4 11.4 22.9 65.7 70.71
Yangju (48) 4.2 4.2 35.4 29.2 27.1 8.3 35.4 56.3 67.71
Dongducheon (26) 7.7 11.5 15.4 38.5 26.9 19.2 15.4 65.4 66.35
Gapyeong County (20) 0.0 0.0 20.0 55.0 25.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 76.25
Yeoncheon County (20) 5.0 15.0 25.0 30.0 25.0 20.0 25.0 55.0 63.75
99 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
6 Changes in life after receiving youth basic income
Q Have there been changes in life after receiving youth basic income?
As for the question on whether there were changes in life after receiving youth basic income, 65.4% responded by saying that ‘There was a change’ (Big change: 11.2% + Quite some change: 54.2%) which was higher than 11.9% who responded by saying that ‘No change’ (Not so much change: 9.2% + No change at all: 2.7%).
[Figure 38] Changes in life after receiving youth basic income [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
No There was change a change
54.2 No change 11.9% Average There 65.52 out were of 100 22.7 changes points Average 65.4% 22.7% 9.2 11.2 2.7
No change Not so mush Average Quite some Big change at all change change
Analysis per characteristics
● As for the response, ‘There was a change’ per respondent characteristics, it was relatively high in female, higher than university graduates and with lower standard of living.
● As for the response, ‘There was a change’ per region of residence, Yeoju City (n=20) was the highest with 90.0% followed by Ansan City (72.8%) and Siheung City (72.2%).
100 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
[Table 23-1] Changes in life after receiving youth basic income – Per respondent characteristics
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
No Not so Quite [Average No. of Big [No [some change much Average some [Average] converted cases change change] change] at all change change to 100 pts]
All (3500) 2.7 9.2 22.7 54.2 11.2 11.9 22.7 65.4 65.52
Male (1221) 4.6 11.9 26.1 46.7 10.7 16.5 26.1 57.4 61.77 Gender Female (2279) 1.7 7.8 20.8 58.2 11.5 9.4 20.8 69.7 67.53
High graduate and below (500) 1.4 7.4 25.0 53.2 13.0 8.8 25.0 66.2 67.25 Educational University student (826) 5.0 9.4 24.3 50.2 11.0 14.4 24.3 61.3 63.23 background University graduate and above (2174) 2.1 9.5 21.5 55.9 10.9 11.6 21.5 66.8 66.00
Single (3414) 2.7 9.3 22.9 54.0 11.0 12.1 22.9 65.0 65.31 Marital Married (79) 1.3 3.8 15.2 58.2 21.5 5.1 15.2 79.7 73.73 status Others (7) 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 75.00
1-person household (324) 2.8 8.6 21.3 53.1 14.2 11.4 21.3 67.3 66.82
Married household (27) 0.0 0.0 11.1 70.4 18.5 0.0 11.1 88.9 76.85 Household Lives with children (37) 2.7 2.7 18.9 56.8 18.9 5.4 18.9 75.7 71.62 type Lives with parents (2846) 2.6 9.6 22.6 54.2 11.0 12.2 22.6 65.2 65.34
Others (266) 3.4 7.9 26.7 53.8 8.3 11.3 26.7 62.0 63.91
Student (with part-time job) (327) 3.7 9.5 19.9 54.1 12.8 13.1 19.9 67.0 65.75
Student (without part-time job) (438) 4.3 9.6 27.6 48.4 10.0 13.9 27.6 58.4 62.56
Current Unemployed (934) 1.9 8.6 23.1 55.2 11.1 10.5 23.1 66.4 66.27 identity status Soldier (32) 9.4 15.6 25.0 43.8 6.3 25.0 25.0 50.0 55.47
Employed (1607) 2.3 9.6 21.8 55.1 11.3 11.9 21.8 66.3 65.85
Others (162) 3.1 6.2 21.0 57.4 12.3 9.3 21.0 69.8 67.44
Below KRW 1 million (175) 2.3 10.3 22.9 54.3 10.3 12.6 22.9 64.6 65.00
KRW 1~below 2 million (546) 1.1 7.5 22.2 56.6 12.6 8.6 22.2 69.2 68.04
KRW 2~below 3 million (842) 2.7 8.1 23.3 52.7 13.2 10.8 23.3 65.9 66.39 Household KRW 3~below 4 million (450) 2.4 9.3 22.4 54.4 11.3 11.8 22.4 65.8 65.72 income KRW 4~below 5 million (522) 2.9 9.2 23.4 54.4 10.2 12.1 23.4 64.6 64.94
KRW 5~below 6 million (291) 4.1 8.2 24.4 55.0 8.2 12.4 24.4 63.2 63.75
Above KRW 6 million (674) 3.4 12.0 21.2 53.4 9.9 15.4 21.2 63.4 63.61
High (398) 5.5 12.6 20.6 52.3 9.0 18.1 20.6 61.3 61.68 Standard Mid (1476) 2.4 9.2 24.5 54.3 9.6 11.6 24.5 64.0 64.91 of living Low (1626) 2.3 8.4 21.6 54.6 13.2 10.6 21.6 67.8 67.02
101 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Table 23-2] Changes in life after receiving youth basic income – Per region of residence
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
No Not so Quite [Average No. of Big [No [some change much Average some [Average] converted cases change change] change] at all change change to 100 pts]
All (City) (3500) 2.7 9.2 22.7 54.2 11.2 11.9 22.7 65.4 65.52
Suwon (363) 3.3 9.1 21.2 55.1 11.3 12.4 21.2 66.4 65.50
Seongnam (254) 5.1 10.6 28.0 48.4 7.9 15.7 28.0 56.3 60.83
Bucheon (261) 3.8 9.2 23.4 54.0 9.6 13.0 23.4 63.6 64.08
Anyang (185) 1.6 10.8 22.7 56.8 8.1 12.4 22.7 64.9 64.73
Ansan (239) 0.8 9.6 16.7 56.1 16.7 10.5 16.7 72.8 69.56
Yongin (270) 3.7 10.7 24.1 50.7 10.7 14.4 24.1 61.5 63.52
Pyeongtaek (131) 3.1 8.4 17.6 61.1 9.9 11.5 17.6 71.0 66.60
Gwangmyeong (96) 3.1 7.3 19.8 58.3 11.5 10.4 19.8 69.8 66.93
Siheung (144) 1.4 4.9 21.5 61.8 10.4 6.3 21.5 72.2 68.75
Gunpo (84) 1.2 8.3 23.8 54.8 11.9 9.5 23.8 66.7 66.96
Hwaseong (155) 3.2 9.7 18.1 56.8 12.3 12.9 18.1 69.0 66.29
Icheon (39) 0.0 12.8 30.8 51.3 5.1 12.8 30.8 56.4 62.18
Gimpo (85) 0.0 11.8 18.8 58.8 10.6 11.8 18.8 69.4 67.06
Gwangju (86) 5.8 8.1 26.7 51.2 8.1 14.0 26.7 59.3 61.92
Anseong (37) 2.7 16.2 27.0 43.2 10.8 18.9 27.0 54.1 60.81 Region of Hanam (43) 4.7 7.0 20.9 53.5 14.0 11.6 20.9 67.4 66.28 residence Uiwang (46) 4.3 15.2 21.7 47.8 10.9 19.6 21.7 58.7 61.41
Osan (53) 0.0 7.5 28.3 50.9 13.2 7.5 28.3 64.2 67.45
Gwacheon (20) 0.0 5.0 30.0 50.0 15.0 5.0 30.0 65.0 68.75
Yeoju (20) 0.0 5.0 5.0 80.0 10.0 5.0 5.0 90.0 73.75
Yangpyeong County (20) 0.0 10.0 30.0 55.0 5.0 10.0 30.0 60.0 63.75
Goyang (280) 2.9 8.9 23.9 53.2 11.1 11.8 23.9 64.3 65.18
Uijeongbu (130) 1.5 7.7 19.2 59.2 12.3 9.2 19.2 71.5 68.27
Namyangju (160) 2.5 6.9 21.9 55.0 13.8 9.4 21.9 68.8 67.66
Paju (96) 1.0 10.4 27.1 52.1 9.4 11.5 27.1 61.5 64.58
Guri (54) 5.6 7.4 24.1 40.7 22.2 13.0 24.1 63.0 66.67
Pocheon (35) 0.0 11.4 31.4 48.6 8.6 11.4 31.4 57.1 63.57
Yangju (48) 0.0 6.3 31.3 52.1 10.4 6.3 31.3 62.5 66.67
Dongducheon (26) 0.0 15.4 15.4 42.3 26.9 15.4 15.4 69.2 70.19
Gapyeong County (20) 5.0 10.0 30.0 50.0 5.0 15.0 30.0 55.0 60.00
Yeoncheon County (20) 0.0 0.0 35.0 50.0 15.0 0.0 35.0 65.0 70.00
102 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
6-1 Fields of changes in life (priority)
If there were changes in life after receiving youth basic income, what were they? Q Please select 2 items only in order regarding the changes in life.
As for the fields of changes in life in respondents who responded by saying there were changes in life after receiving youth basic income (n=2,290), ‘Was able to attempt self-development’ was the highest with 30.4% followed by ‘Was able to reduce financial burden when meeting friends and others’ (28.0%) and ‘Was able to buy things that respondents had wanted to buy' (13.6%).(based on 1st priority)
[Figure 39] Fields of changes in life (priority) [Base: Respondents who responded that there were changes in life after receiving youth basic income, n=2290, Unit: %]
1st priority 43.0 52.3 1+2 priority
35.7 30.4 28.0 25.4 21.1 15.9 13.6 9.9 7.9 6.9 6.7 3.2
Was able to Was able to Was able to Was able to Was able to Was able to Others attempt self- reduce financial buy things that travel or enjoy give money or reduce time of development burden when respondents leisure gifts to people labor done for meeting friends had wanted to around the purpose of and others buy income
Analysis per characteristics
● As for the response, ‘Was able to attempt self-development’ per respondent characteristics, it was relatively high in male, with lower education level, who were currently soldiers and with household income of KRW 1 million ~ below KRW 2 million. (based on 1st priority)
103 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Table 24-1-1] Fields of changes in life (1st priority) – Per respondent characteristics
[Base: Respondents who responded that there were changes in life after receiving youth basic income, n=2290, Unit: %]
Was able to Was able Was able Was able Was able to Was able attempt self- to reduce to buy to travel give money to reduce development financial things that or enjoy or gifts time of No. of 1st priority burden when respondents leisure to people labor done Others cases meeting had wanted around for the friends and to buy purpose of others income
All (2290) 30.4 28.0 13.6 9.9 7.9 6.9 3.2
Male (701) 36.8 28.1 10.7 8.8 7.0 6.8 1.7 Gender Female (1589) 27.6 28.0 14.9 10.4 8.4 6.9 3.9
High graduate and below (331) 33.5 25.7 17.2 10.0 8.2 3.3 2.1 Educational University student (506) 32.4 28.9 10.3 8.1 6.3 10.9 3.2 background University graduate and above (1453) 29.0 28.3 13.9 10.5 8.5 6.3 3.5
Single (2220) 30.5 28.1 13.5 9.8 7.9 6.9 3.2 Marital Married (63) 27.0 27.0 15.9 14.3 7.9 4.8 3.2 status Others (7) 28.6 28.6 14.3 0.0 14.3 14.3 0.0
1-person household (218) 32.6 28.0 12.8 9.2 7.3 6.4 3.7
Married household (24) 33.3 20.8 8.3 12.5 16.7 4.2 4.2 Household Lives with children (28) 25.0 25.0 25.0 17.9 3.6 3.6 0.0 type Lives with parents (1855) 30.3 28.5 13.3 10.0 7.7 7.0 3.2
Others (165) 29.1 24.2 16.4 7.9 11.5 7.9 3.0
Student (with part-time job) (219) 33.3 29.2 6.8 6.8 7.8 13.7 2.3
Student (without part-time job) (256) 31.6 28.5 11.7 11.7 5.1 8.2 3.1
Current Unemployed (620) 31.6 28.9 12.9 8.4 5.3 10.2 2.7 identity status Soldier (16) 43.8 37.5 6.3 0.0 12.5 0.0 0.0 Employed (1066) 28.4 28.0 15.2 11.3 9.9 3.4 3.8
Others (113) 31.9 18.6 20.4 8.8 9.7 7.1 3.5
Below KRW 1 million (113) 31.9 23.9 16.8 12.4 8.0 2.7 4.4
KRW 1~below 2 million (378) 33.3 26.2 13.0 10.6 9.3 4.8 2.9
KRW 2~below 3 million (555) 31.5 28.8 13.5 7.4 7.0 8.6 3.1 Household KRW 3~below 4 million (296) 26.7 30.7 13.2 7.1 9.1 9.8 3.4 income KRW 4~below 5 million (337) 27.3 29.4 12.8 11.6 8.9 7.1 3.0
KRW 5~below 6 million (184) 30.4 27.7 15.8 10.9 8.2 5.4 1.6
Above KRW 6 million (427) 30.9 26.9 13.3 12.2 6.3 6.1 4.2
High (244) 28.7 27.9 11.5 13.5 7.4 8.2 2.9 Standard Mid (944) 31.1 27.1 14.6 9.1 8.3 6.8 3.0 of living Low (1102) 30.1 28.9 13.2 9.8 7.8 6.7 3.5
104 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
[Table 24-1-2] Fields of changes in life (1st priority) – Per region of residence
[Base: Respondents who responded that there were changes in life after receiving youth basic income, n=2290, Unit: %]
Was able to Was able to Was able Was able Was able to Was able attempt self- reduce financial to buy to travel give money to reduce No. of development burden when things that or enjoy or gifts time of labor 1st priority Others cases meeting friends respondents leisure to people done for the and otherst had wanted to around purpose of buy income
All (City) (2290) 30.4 28.0 13.6 9.9 7.9 6.9 3.2
Suwon (241) 33.6 24.9 14.9 12.9 5.8 5.4 2.5
Seongnam (143) 25.9 23.8 19.6 11.2 9.1 8.4 2.1
Bucheon (166) 33.1 25.9 13.3 7.8 7.8 7.8 4.2
Anyang (120) 28.3 26.7 14.2 5.0 10.8 13.3 1.7
Ansan (174) 33.9 30.5 12.1 9.8 6.9 3.4 3.4
Yongin (166) 25.3 31.9 13.9 10.8 9.0 7.2 1.8
Pyeongtaek (93) 29.0 28.0 19.4 5.4 12.9 3.2 2.2
Gwangmyeong (67) 38.8 31.3 7.5 6.0 11.9 3.0 1.5
Siheung (104) 18.3 35.6 12.5 10.6 11.5 4.8 6.7
Gunpo (56) 32.1 25.0 5.4 19.6 7.1 8.9 1.8
Hwaseong (107) 28.0 29.0 11.2 9.3 10.3 11.2 0.9
Icheon (22) 22.7 31.8 18.2 4.5 18.2 4.5 0.0
Gimpo (59) 37.3 32.2 15.3 6.8 6.8 1.7 0.0
Gwangju (51) 25.5 29.4 21.6 9.8 5.9 2.0 5.9
Anseong (20) 20.0 25.0 5.0 20.0 25.0 5.0 0.0 Region of Hanam (29) 44.8 17.2 3.4 13.8 3.4 6.9 10.3 residence Uiwang (27) 14.8 44.4 7.4 14.8 3.7 7.4 7.4
Osan (34) 35.3 29.4 11.8 11.8 2.9 8.8 0.0
Gwacheon (13) 46.2 23.1 7.7 15.4 0.0 7.7 0.0
Yeoju (18) 11.1 16.7 5.6 27.8 22.2 16.7 0.0
Yangpyeong County (12) 33.3 16.7 16.7 16.7 8.3 0.0 8.3
Goyang (180) 34.4 29.4 10.0 7.8 3.9 9.4 5.0
Uijeongbu (93) 34.4 24.7 11.8 15.1 3.2 9.7 1.1
Namyangju (110) 27.3 27.3 12.7 8.2 9.1 7.3 8.2
Paju (59) 33.9 25.4 15.3 8.5 6.8 6.8 3.4
Guri (34) 32.4 20.6 23.5 14.7 0.0 8.8 0.0
Pocheon (20) 20.0 45.0 0.0 15.0 10.0 5.0 5.0
Yangju (30) 23.3 30.0 26.7 0.0 10.0 0.0 10.0
Dongducheon (18) 44.4 38.9 5.6 0.0 5.6 5.6 0.0
Gapyeong County (11) 27.3 9.1 45.5 0.0 9.1 9.1 0.0
Yeoncheon County (13) 46.2 23.1 23.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.7
105 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Table 24-2-1] Fields of changes in life (1+2 priority) – Per respondent characteristics
[Base: Respondents who responded that there were changes in life after receiving youth basic income, n=2290, Unit: %]
Was able Was able to Was able Was able Was able to Was able to reduce attempt self- to buy to travel give money to reduce financial development things that or enjoy or gifts time of No. of burden respondents leisure to people labor done 1+2 priority Others cases when had wanted around for the meeting to buy purpose of friends and income others
All (2290) 52.3 43.0 35.7 25.4 21.1 15.9 6.7
Male (701) 52.5 49.5 30.8 26.5 21.1 15.8 3.7 Gender Female (1589) 52.2 40.2 37.8 24.9 21.1 15.9 8.0
High graduate and below (331) 48.6 46.5 38.7 28.4 22.4 8.8 6.6 Educational University student (506) 52.4 45.8 35.4 19.0 18.4 23.5 5.5 background University graduate and above (1453) 53.1 41.2 35.1 26.9 21.8 14.8 7.1
Single (2220) 52.5 43.2 35.7 25.1 21.3 15.9 6.3 Marital Married (63) 46.0 34.9 38.1 34.9 15.9 12.7 17.5 status Others (7) 28.6 42.9 14.3 14.3 28.6 28.6 42.9
1-person household (218) 49.1 43.1 38.5 25.2 22.5 14.7 6.9
Married household (24) 37.5 41.7 20.8 50.0 20.8 12.5 16.7 Household Lives with children (28) 46.4 32.1 53.6 28.6 14.3 7.1 17.9 type Lives with parents (1855) 53.4 43.2 34.9 25.3 20.5 16.4 6.3
Others (165) 46.7 43.0 39.4 22.4 27.9 13.3 7.3
Student (with part-time job) (219) 53.4 47.9 30.1 19.6 17.4 25.6 5.9
Student (without part-time job) (256) 52.0 44.1 37.1 22.7 18.4 21.5 4.3
Current Unemployed (620) 53.2 46.9 32.7 22.9 14.7 23.4 6.1 identity status Soldier (16) 56.3 50.0 31.3 25.0 31.3 6.3 0.0 Employed (1066) 52.0 39.6 37.7 28.5 26.4 8.4 7.4
Others (113) 47.8 40.7 40.7 26.5 19.5 14.2 10.6
Below KRW 1 million (113) 47.8 43.4 43.4 22.1 19.5 15.0 8.8
KRW 1~below 2 million (378) 48.4 45.5 37.0 26.2 21.2 15.3 6.3
KRW 2~below 3 million (555) 51.2 43.4 35.0 24.3 21.4 18.6 6.1 Household KRW 3~below 4 million (296) 57.8 41.6 33.1 20.3 23.3 16.6 7.4 income KRW 4~below 5 million (337) 55.2 39.8 36.5 26.1 20.8 15.4 6.2
KRW 5~below 6 million (184) 51.6 41.3 41.3 23.9 22.8 15.2 3.8
Above KRW 6 million (427) 52.5 44.5 32.1 30.4 19.2 13.1 8.2
High (244) 50.4 42.6 31.6 30.7 20.5 16.4 7.8 Standard Mid (944) 51.1 45.0 36.4 26.6 19.7 15.7 5.5 of living Low (1102) 53.7 41.4 35.9 23.1 22.5 15.9 7.4
106 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
[Table 24-2-2] Fields of changes in life (1+2 priority) – Per region of residence
[Base: Respondents who responded that there were changes in life after receiving youth basic income, n=2290, Unit: %]
Was able to Was able to Was able Was able Was able to Was able reduce financial attempt self- to buy to travel or give money to reduce No. of burden when development things that enjoy leisure or gifts time of labor 1+2 priority Others cases meeting friends respondents to people done for the and others had wanted around purpose of to buy income
All (City) (2290) 52.3 43.0 35.7 25.4 21.1 15.9 6.7
Suwon (241) 47.7 42.3 35.3 29.9 19.5 18.3 7.1
Seongnam (143) 41.3 40.6 44.1 28.0 24.5 16.1 5.6
Bucheon (166) 51.2 46.4 38.6 20.5 22.3 14.5 6.6
Anyang (120) 56.7 40.0 30.0 16.7 25.8 25.0 5.8
Ansan (174) 49.4 47.7 37.9 25.3 20.1 11.5 8.0
Yongin (166) 55.4 39.2 33.7 30.7 18.1 18.1 4.8
Pyeongtaek (93) 59.1 40.9 34.4 23.7 23.7 10.8 7.5
Gwangmyeong (67) 56.7 50.7 22.4 29.9 26.9 9.0 4.5
Siheung (104) 58.7 25.0 42.3 26.0 26.0 13.5 8.7
Gunpo (56) 55.4 42.9 30.4 35.7 12.5 16.1 7.1
Hwaseong (107) 50.5 44.9 34.6 27.1 25.2 15.0 2.8
Icheon (22) 40.9 27.3 50.0 27.3 27.3 18.2 9.1
Gimpo (59) 45.8 49.2 39.0 23.7 28.8 8.5 5.1
Gwangju (51) 56.9 45.1 35.3 21.6 19.6 9.8 11.8
Anseong (20) 40.0 50.0 35.0 25.0 30.0 15.0 5.0 Region of Hanam (29) 58.6 55.2 13.8 20.7 13.8 27.6 10.3 residence Uiwang (27) 55.6 29.6 37.0 18.5 25.9 25.9 7.4
Osan (34) 64.7 52.9 26.5 32.4 8.8 14.7 0.0
Gwacheon (13) 30.8 53.8 38.5 23.1 23.1 30.8 0.0
Yeoju (18) 55.6 27.8 22.2 33.3 33.3 16.7 11.1
Yangpyeong County (12) 50.0 50.0 33.3 25.0 16.7 8.3 16.7
Goyang (180) 63.3 48.3 30.0 20.0 16.7 14.4 7.2
Uijeongbu (93) 49.5 46.2 40.9 26.9 17.2 17.2 2.2
Namyangju (110) 48.2 39.1 34.5 30.9 18.2 16.4 12.7
Paju (59) 55.9 44.1 39.0 18.6 16.9 15.3 10.2
Guri (34) 44.1 50.0 38.2 29.4 14.7 23.5 0.0
Pocheon (20) 60.0 35.0 25.0 25.0 35.0 15.0 5.0
Yangju (30) 43.3 36.7 50.0 13.3 33.3 13.3 10.0
Dongducheon (18) 61.1 50.0 44.4 11.1 16.7 16.7 0.0
Gapyeong County (11) 36.4 36.4 63.6 18.2 18.2 27.3 0.0
Yeoncheon County (13) 38.5 53.8 46.2 23.1 7.7 15.4 15.4
107 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
6-2 Items that require improvements (priority)
What are the items that need to be improved the most currently in the youth basic Q income project implemented by Gyeonggi Province? Please select 3 items only in order.
As for items that require improvements in respondents who responded by saying that there were no changes in life after receiving youth basic income (n=416), ‘Payment amount has to be increased’ was the highest with 23.6% followed by ‘Areas where it can be used must be extended to areas other than the place of residence’ (22.8%) ‘The problem of not being able to receive basic living subsidy in case the recipient of basic living subsidy is subject to youth basic income has to be resolved' (18.8%).(based on 1st priority)
[Figure 40] Items that require improvements (priority)
[Base: Respondents who responded that there were no changes in life after receiving youth basic income, n=416, Unit: %]
72.1 1st priority 58.4 1+2+3 priority 45.7 46.9 38.5
23.6 22.8 22.8 18.8 14.2 8.2 12.3 11.8 3.4 0.5 0.2
Payment Areas where The problem of Payment Application The restriction It has to be Others amount has to it can be not being able to subject must for payment in residence paid to foreign be increased used must be receive basic living be extended has to be condition such youths (age extended to subsidy in case the without simplified as 3 years of 24) residing areas other recipient of basic restricting to residence has in Gyeonggi than the place living subsidy is 24-year old to be relieved Province of residence subject to youth youths basic income has to be resolved
Analysis per characteristics
● As for the response, ‘Payment amount has to be increased’ per respondent characteristics, it was relatively high in under high school graduates and with lower standard of living. (based on 1st priority)
108 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
[Table 25-1-1] Items that require improvements (1st priority) – Per respondent characteristics
[Base: Respondents who responded that there were no changes in life after receiving youth basic income, n=416, Unit: %]
Payment Areas The problem of Payment Application The It has to amount where not being able subject for restriction be paid has to be it can to receive basic must be payment in to foreign increased be used living subsidy extended has to be residence youths must be in case the without simplified condition (age 24) No. of 1st priority extended recipient of basic restricting such as 3 residing in Others cases to areas living subsidy to 24-year years of Gyeonggi other is subject to old youths residence Province than the youth basic has to be place of income has to relieved residence be resolved
All (416) 23.6 22.8 18.8 14.2 8.2 0.5 0.2 11.8
Male (201) 23.4 20.4 19.4 11.4 10.0 1.0 0.5 13.9 Gender Female (215) 23.7 25.1 18.1 16.7 6.5 0.0 0.0 9.8
High graduate and below (44) 38.6 9.1 9.1 22.7 6.8 0.0 0.0 13.6 Educational University student (119) 16.0 30.3 19.3 10.1 11.8 0.8 0.0 11.8 background University graduate and above (253) 24.5 21.7 20.2 14.6 6.7 0.4 0.4 11.5
Marital Single (412) 23.5 23.1 18.7 14.3 8.0 0.5 0.2 11.7 status Married (4) 25.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 25.0
1-person household (37) 29.7 18.9 10.8 10.8 16.2 0.0 0.0 13.5
Household Lives with children (2) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 type Lives with parents (347) 23.6 22.8 19.3 13.8 7.5 0.6 0.3 12.1
Others (30) 16.7 30.0 23.3 23.3 3.3 0.0 0.0 3.3
Student (with part-time job) (43) 9.3 25.6 25.6 16.3 11.6 0.0 0.0 11.6
Student (without part-time job) (61) 18.0 31.1 16.4 4.9 11.5 0.0 1.6 16.4
Current Unemployed (98) 25.5 22.4 18.4 18.4 4.1 1.0 0.0 10.2 identity status Soldier (8) 25.0 37.5 25.0 12.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Employed (191) 26.7 19.9 17.8 14.7 8.9 0.5 0.0 11.5
Others (15) 33.3 13.3 20.0 13.3 6.7 0.0 0.0 13.3
Below KRW 1 million (22) 18.2 22.7 22.7 13.6 9.1 0.0 0.0 13.6
KRW 1~below 2 million (47) 44.7 12.8 10.6 14.9 8.5 0.0 2.1 6.4
KRW 2~below 3 million (91) 36.3 18.7 11.0 14.3 9.9 1.1 0.0 8.8 Household KRW 3~below 4 million (53) 20.8 24.5 28.3 13.2 3.8 0.0 0.0 9.4 income KRW 4~below 5 million (63) 25.4 17.5 17.5 14.3 11.1 1.6 0.0 12.7
KRW 5~below 6 million (36) 13.9 25.0 25.0 16.7 5.6 0.0 0.0 13.9
Above KRW 6 million (104) 7.7 32.7 22.1 13.5 7.7 0.0 0.0 16.3
High (72) 9.7 25.0 26.4 8.3 11.1 0.0 0.0 19.4 Standard Mid (171) 21.1 22.8 21.6 14.0 7.6 1.2 0.0 11.7 of living Low (173) 31.8 22.0 12.7 16.8 7.5 0.0 0.6 8.7
109 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Table 25-1-2] Items that require improvements (1st priority) – Per region of residence
[Base: Respondents who responded that there were no changes in life after receiving youth basic income, n=416, Unit: %]
Payment Areas where The problem of Payment Application The It has to amount it can be not being able to subject for restriction be paid has to be used must receive basic living must be payment in residence to foreign increased be extended subsidy in case the extended has to be condition youths (age No. of 1st priority to areas recipient of basic without simplified such as 3 24) residing Others cases other than living subsidy is restricting years of in Gyeonggi the place of subject to youth to 24-year residence Province residence basic income has old youths has to be to be resolved relieved
All (City) (416) 23.6 22.8 18.8 14.2 8.2 0.5 0.2 11.8 Suwon (45) 28.9 22.2 15.6 13.3 2.2 0.0 0.0 17.8 Seongnam (40) 22.5 27.5 25.0 7.5 12.5 0.0 0.0 5.0 Bucheon (34) 20.6 17.6 17.6 20.6 8.8 0.0 0.0 14.7 Anyang (23) 26.1 13.0 21.7 8.7 21.7 0.0 0.0 8.7 Ansan (25) 28.0 4.0 16.0 20.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 Yongin (39) 10.3 30.8 17.9 15.4 10.3 5.1 0.0 10.3 Pyeongtaek (15) 13.3 53.3 6.7 0.0 6.7 0.0 0.0 20.0 Gwangmyeong (10) 30.0 10.0 10.0 30.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 Siheung (9) 22.2 22.2 11.1 11.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 33.3 Gunpo (8) 12.5 0.0 50.0 12.5 12.5 0.0 0.0 12.5 Hwaseong (20) 25.0 25.0 20.0 15.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 Icheon (5) 60.0 20.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Gimpo (10) 10.0 10.0 30.0 10.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 Gwangju (12) 41.7 33.3 16.7 8.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Region Anseong (7) 71.4 14.3 14.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 of residence Hanam (5) 20.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 40.0 Uiwang (9) 11.1 33.3 0.0 44.4 11.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Osan (4) 0.0 25.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.0 Gwacheon (1) 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Yeoju (1) 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Yangpyeong County (2) 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Goyang (33) 12.1 30.3 12.1 24.2 9.1 0.0 0.0 12.1 Uijeongbu (12) 25.0 33.3 25.0 8.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.3 Namyangju (15) 20.0 33.3 26.7 13.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.7 Paju (11) 54.5 9.1 9.1 18.2 9.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Guri (7) 14.3 0.0 14.3 28.6 14.3 0.0 0.0 28.6 Pocheon (4) 50.0 25.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Yangju (3) 33.3 33.3 0.0 33.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Dongducheon (4) 25.0 25.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Gapyeong County (3) 0.0 33.3 33.3 0.0 33.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
110 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
[Table 25-2-1] Items that require improvements (1+2+3 priority) – Per respondent characteristics
[Base: Respondents who responded that there were no changes in life after receiving youth basic income, n=416, Unit: %]
Areas The problem Payment Payment Application The It has to where of not being subject amount for restriction be paid it can able to receive must be has to be payment in to foreign be used basic living extended increased has to be residence youths must be subsidy in case without simplified condition (age 24) No. of extended the recipient restricting such as 3 residing in 1+2+3 priority Others cases to areas of basic living to 24-year years of Gyeonggi other subsidy is old youths residence Province than the subject to has to be place of youth basic relieved residence income has to be resolved
All (416) 72.1 58.4 46.9 45.7 38.5 12.3 3.4 22.8
Male (201) 67.7 61.2 41.3 43.3 41.8 14.9 5.0 24.9 Gender Female (215) 76.3 55.8 52.1 47.9 35.3 9.8 1.9 20.9
High graduate and below (44) 65.9 54.5 61.4 59.1 31.8 9.1 2.3 15.9 Educational University student (119) 79.0 58.0 34.5 37.0 45.4 14.3 5.0 26.9 background University graduate and above (253) 70.0 59.3 50.2 47.4 36.4 11.9 2.8 22.1
Marital Single (412) 72.3 58.3 46.8 45.6 38.6 12.1 3.4 22.8 status Married (4) 50.0 75.0 50.0 50.0 25.0 25.0 0.0 25.0
1-person household (37) 75.7 43.2 51.4 43.2 40.5 21.6 8.1 16.2
Household Lives with children (2) 100.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 type Lives with parents (347) 72.0 60.2 47.3 45.5 37.8 10.1 2.9 24.2
Others (30) 66.7 56.7 40.0 53.3 43.3 23.3 3.3 13.3
Student (with part-time job) (43) 67.4 67.4 34.9 37.2 44.2 16.3 2.3 30.2
Student (without part-time job) (61) 78.7 54.1 27.9 36.1 54.1 11.5 6.6 31.1
Current Unemployed (98) 74.5 55.1 52.0 52.0 27.6 12.2 2.0 24.5 identity status Soldier (8) 75.0 62.5 37.5 50.0 75.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Employed (191) 68.6 60.2 53.4 46.1 36.1 13.1 3.7 18.8
Others (15) 86.7 46.7 46.7 60.0 40.0 0.0 0.0 20.0
Below KRW 1 million (22) 68.2 63.6 45.5 40.9 27.3 22.7 4.5 27.3
KRW 1~below 2 million (47) 68.1 42.6 63.8 63.8 31.9 12.8 4.3 12.8
KRW 2~below 3 million (91) 71.4 51.6 38.5 58.2 48.4 13.2 2.2 16.5 Household KRW 3~below 4 million (53) 75.5 60.4 45.3 49.1 26.4 13.2 1.9 28.3 income KRW 4~below 5 million (63) 66.7 58.7 50.8 46.0 38.1 12.7 3.2 23.8
KRW 5~below 6 million (36) 83.3 61.1 44.4 36.1 38.9 8.3 2.8 25.0
Above KRW 6 million (104) 73.1 68.3 46.2 28.8 41.3 9.6 4.8 27.9
High (72) 75.0 69.4 33.3 20.8 54.2 8.3 2.8 36.1 Standard Mid (171) 73.1 61.4 48.5 38.0 38.6 14.6 3.5 22.2 of living Low (173) 69.9 50.9 50.9 63.6 31.8 11.6 3.5 17.9
111 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Table 25-2-2] Items that require improvements (1+2+3 priority) – Per region of residence
[Base: Respondents who responded that there were no changes in life after receiving youth basic income, n=416, Unit: %]
Areas The problem of Payment Payment Application The It has to where it not being able to subject must amount for restriction be paid can be used receive basic living be extended has to be payment in residence to foreign must be subsidy in case the without increased has to be condition youths (age No. of 1+2+3 priority extended recipient of basic restricting to simplified such as 3 24) residing Others cases to areas living subsidy is 24-year old years of in Gyeonggi other than subject to youth youths residence Province the place of basic income has has to be residence to be resolved relieved
All (City) (416) 72.1 58.4 46.9 45.7 38.5 12.3 3.4 22.8 Suwon (45) 75.6 55.6 48.9 44.4 40.0 6.7 0.0 28.9 Seongnam (40) 72.5 65.0 35.0 42.5 55.0 12.5 5.0 12.5 Bucheon (34) 70.6 55.9 52.9 44.1 26.5 29.4 2.9 17.6 Anyang (23) 69.6 47.8 47.8 52.2 52.2 4.3 4.3 21.7 Ansan (25) 60.0 68.0 56.0 48.0 40.0 0.0 0.0 28.0 Yongin (39) 87.2 56.4 43.6 38.5 38.5 10.3 5.1 20.5 Pyeongtaek (15) 80.0 46.7 33.3 33.3 46.7 26.7 6.7 26.7 Gwangmyeong (10) 80.0 40.0 60.0 50.0 40.0 10.0 0.0 20.0 Siheung (9) 55.6 88.9 44.4 22.2 33.3 11.1 0.0 44.4 Gunpo (8) 62.5 75.0 50.0 25.0 37.5 25.0 0.0 25.0 Hwaseong (20) 90.0 55.0 50.0 45.0 40.0 5.0 0.0 15.0 Icheon (5) 20.0 60.0 80.0 80.0 40.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 Gimpo (10) 70.0 60.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 10.0 0.0 40.0 Gwangju (12) 75.0 41.7 66.7 50.0 33.3 8.3 0.0 25.0 Region Anseong (7) 71.4 42.9 42.9 71.4 28.6 0.0 0.0 42.9 of residence Hanam (5) 40.0 60.0 40.0 40.0 60.0 0.0 20.0 40.0 Uiwang (9) 100.0 55.6 77.8 33.3 22.2 11.1 0.0 0.0 Osan (4) 50.0 100.0 25.0 50.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 50.0 Gwacheon (1) 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 Yeoju (1) 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Yangpyeong County (2) 50.0 50.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Goyang (33) 66.7 60.6 48.5 39.4 33.3 18.2 6.1 27.3 Uijeongbu (12) 58.3 58.3 33.3 66.7 25.0 8.3 16.7 33.3 Namyangju (15) 86.7 53.3 33.3 53.3 33.3 20.0 0.0 20.0 Paju (11) 54.5 72.7 45.5 63.6 45.5 9.1 0.0 9.1 Guri (7) 57.1 28.6 28.6 71.4 42.9 14.3 14.3 42.9 Pocheon (4) 75.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 Yangju (3) 66.7 66.7 66.7 66.7 33.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 Dongducheon (4) 75.0 75.0 50.0 75.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 Gapyeong County (3) 100.0 100.0 33.3 0.0 33.3 0.0 33.3 0.0
112 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
Appropriate amount of youth basic income 7 per quarter next year (2020)
If you were to receive the youth basic income next year (2020), what do Q you think is the appropriate amount per quarter?
As for the opinion on the appropriate amount of youth basic income per quarter next year (2020), ‘KRW 200,000~below KRW 300,000’ was the highest with 47.6% followed by ‘KRW 300,000~below KRW 400,000’ (28.4%) and ‘KRW 400,000~below KRW 500,000’ (12.9%).
[Figure 41] Appropriate amount of youth basic income per quarter next year (2020)
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
47.6
28.4
12.9
6.8 3.5 0.7
Below KRW KRW 100,000~ KRW 200,000~ KRW 300,000~ KRW 400,0000~ Others 100,000 below KRW 200,000 below KRW 300,000 below KRW 400,000 below KRW 500,000
Analysis per characteristics
● As for the response, ‘KRW 200,000~below KRW 300,000’ per respondent characteristics, it was relatively high in female, with higher education level and with household income of KRW 5 million ~ KRW 6 million.
113 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Table 26-1] Appropriate amount of youth basic income per quarter next year (2020) – Per respondent characteristics [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
KRW KRW KRW KRW No. of Below KRW 100,000~ 200,000~ 300,000~ 400,0000~ Others cases 100,000 below KRW below KRW below KRW below KRW 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000
All (3500) 3.5 6.8 47.6 28.4 12.9 0.7
Male (1221) 5.8 5.8 41.0 29.0 17.4 1.0 Gender Female (2279) 2.3 7.3 51.2 28.1 10.6 0.5
High graduate and below (500) 1.4 2.8 40.0 38.0 16.8 1.0 Educational University student (826) 5.0 6.7 45.2 28.8 13.4 1.0 background University graduate and above (2174) 3.4 7.8 50.3 26.1 11.9 0.5
Single (3414) 3.6 6.9 47.2 28.6 13.1 0.7 Marital Married (79) 0.0 2.5 63.3 24.1 8.9 1.3 status Others (7) 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1-person household (324) 5.6 6.5 41.4 31.8 14.8 0.0
Married household (27) 0.0 0.0 70.4 18.5 7.4 3.7 Household Lives with children (37) 0.0 2.7 62.2 27.0 8.1 0.0 type Lives with parents (2846) 3.4 7.0 47.9 28.0 13.0 0.7
Others (266) 2.6 6.8 48.1 30.5 11.3 0.8
Student (with part-time job) (327) 4.6 5.8 42.5 31.5 15.3 0.3
Student (without part-time job) (438) 6.2 7.5 45.4 26.5 13.0 1.4
Current Unemployed (934) 2.7 5.9 47.8 29.7 13.4 0.6 identity status Soldier (32) 6.3 3.1 43.8 21.9 25.0 0.0
Employed (1607) 3.2 7.5 49.1 28.1 11.5 0.6
Others (162) 1.9 5.6 49.4 24.7 17.3 1.2
Below KRW 1 million (175) 5.1 5.7 46.9 25.1 16.6 0.6
KRW 1~below 2 million (546) 2.7 5.9 47.3 27.8 16.1 0.2
KRW 2~below 3 million (842) 3.2 6.7 45.5 29.6 14.1 1.0 Household KRW 3~below 4 million (450) 3.6 5.8 46.9 30.4 12.4 0.9 income KRW 4~below 5 million (522) 2.7 6.9 45.8 31.4 12.5 0.8
KRW 5~below 6 million (291) 3.4 7.6 51.9 26.5 9.6 1.0
Above KRW 6 million (674) 4.7 8.3 50.9 25.5 10.1 0.4
High (398) 9.0 10.3 47.7 24.4 7.8 0.8 Standard Mid (1476) 3.0 8.1 50.5 26.8 11.4 0.3 of living Low (1626) 2.6 4.8 45.0 30.9 15.6 1.0
114 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
[Table 26-2] Appropriate amount of youth basic income per quarter next year (2020) – Per region of residence [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
KRW KRW KRW KRW No. of Below KRW 100,000~ 200,000~ 300,000~ 400,0000~ Others cases 100,000 below KRW below KRW below KRW below KRW 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000
All (City) (3500) 3.5 6.8 47.6 28.4 12.9 0.7
Suwon (363) 3.9 8.0 51.8 25.3 10.7 0.3
Seongnam (254) 2.0 7.9 49.6 24.8 14.6 1.2
Bucheon (261) 3.8 5.7 44.1 30.7 14.9 0.8
Anyang (185) 4.9 9.2 48.1 24.9 11.9 1.1
Ansan (239) 3.8 5.0 43.9 34.3 12.1 0.8
Yongin (270) 5.2 5.9 48.5 27.8 11.5 1.1
Pyeongtaek (131) 3.1 9.2 42.0 32.1 11.5 2.3
Gwangmyeong (96) 3.1 6.3 43.8 35.4 11.5 0.0
Siheung (144) 3.5 11.1 50.7 26.4 7.6 0.7
Gunpo (84) 2.4 6.0 58.3 20.2 13.1 0.0
Hwaseong (155) 4.5 7.1 45.8 27.7 14.2 0.6
Icheon (39) 7.7 2.6 46.2 30.8 12.8 0.0
Gimpo (85) 3.5 8.2 49.4 32.9 5.9 0.0
Gwangju (86) 1.2 4.7 48.8 32.6 11.6 1.2
Anseong (37) 0.0 5.4 40.5 29.7 24.3 0.0 Region of Hanam (43) 7.0 7.0 34.9 34.9 16.3 0.0 residence Uiwang (46) 6.5 10.9 47.8 28.3 6.5 0.0
Osan (53) 3.8 5.7 49.1 28.3 13.2 0.0
Gwacheon (20) 5.0 5.0 40.0 35.0 15.0 0.0
Yeoju (20) 0.0 10.0 45.0 30.0 10.0 5.0
Yangpyeong County (20) 0.0 10.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 0.0
Goyang (280) 5.0 4.3 50.0 25.4 14.6 0.7
Uijeongbu (130) 1.5 6.9 42.3 36.9 12.3 0.0
Namyangju (160) 1.3 4.4 48.8 27.5 17.5 0.6
Paju (96) 0.0 5.2 50.0 28.1 16.7 0.0
Guri (54) 5.6 11.1 53.7 16.7 13.0 0.0
Pocheon (35) 0.0 8.6 54.3 22.9 11.4 2.9
Yangju (48) 2.1 6.3 52.1 29.2 10.4 0.0
Dongducheon (26) 3.8 3.8 30.8 42.3 19.2 0.0
Gapyeong County (20) 10.0 10.0 40.0 30.0 10.0 0.0
Yeoncheon County (20) 0.0 5.0 40.0 20.0 35.0 0.0
115 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
When the youths came to learn about payment of 8 youth basic income (based on 1st quarter)
When did you learn when the youth basic income would be paid? Q st Please answer based on the 1 quarter payment.
As for the question on when the youths came to learn about the payment of youth basic income, ‘Between January ~ April 2019 (preparation period) was the highest with 52.5% followed by ‘April 2019 (1st registration period’ (26.3%) and end of 2018 (when the ordinance was enacted)’ (18.5%).
[Figure 42] When the youths came to learn about payment [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %] of youth basic income (based on 1st quarter)
52.5
26.3 18.5
2.1 0.7
End of 2018 Between Jan. ~ Apr. 2019 Apr. 2019 May 2019 Others (When the ordinance (Preparation period) 1st registration period 2nd extension period was enacted) (Apr. 8 ~ Apr. 30) (May 1 ~ May 10)
Analysis per characteristics
● As for the response ‘Between January ~ April 2019 (preparation period)’ per respondent characteristics, it was relatively high in male, university students, who were currently students (without part-time jobs) and with household income of KRW 3 million ~ below KRW 4 million.
● As for the response ‘Between January ~ April 2019 (preparation period)’ per region of residence, Pocheon City was the highest with 68.6% followed by Dongducheon City (65.4%, n=26) and Gimpo City (64.7%).
116 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
[Table 27-1] When the youths came to learn about payment of youth basic income (based on 1st quarter) – Per respondent characteristics [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
End of 2018 Between Jan. Apr. 2019 May 2019 No. of (When the ~ Apr. 2019 1st registration 2nd extension Others cases ordinance was (Preparation period period enacted) period) (Apr. 8 ~ Apr. 30) (May 1 ~ May 10)
All (3500) 18.5 52.5 26.3 2.1 0.7
Male (1221) 20.4 56.9 20.2 2.0 0.4 Gender Female (2279) 17.4 50.2 29.5 2.1 0.8
High graduate and below (500) 16.2 53.0 26.2 4.0 0.6 Educational University student (826) 21.8 53.9 22.5 1.3 0.5 background University graduate and above (2174) 17.7 51.9 27.7 1.9 0.7
Single (3414) 18.5 52.6 26.1 2.1 0.6 Marital Married (79) 15.2 48.1 32.9 2.5 1.3 status Others (7) 28.6 57.1 14.3 0.0 0.0
1-person household (324) 19.8 50.9 26.5 2.2 0.6
Married household (27) 22.2 59.3 18.5 0.0 0.0 Household Lives with children (37) 10.8 43.2 37.8 5.4 2.7 type Lives with parents (2846) 19.1 52.2 26.0 2.0 0.7
Others (266) 10.2 59.0 28.2 2.3 0.4
Student (with part-time job) (327) 21.1 52.6 23.9 1.8 0.6
Student (without part-time job) (438) 22.4 54.3 21.0 1.4 0.9
Current Unemployed (934) 17.8 51.8 28.1 1.6 0.7 identity status Soldier (32) 12.5 71.9 9.4 6.3 0.0
Employed (1607) 17.4 52.7 26.9 2.5 0.6
Others (162) 18.5 46.3 32.1 2.5 0.6
Below KRW 1 million (175) 20.6 56.0 19.4 2.3 1.7
KRW 1~below 2 million (546) 15.4 51.5 30.2 2.2 0.7
KRW 2~below 3 million (842) 17.9 51.9 27.4 2.1 0.6 Household KRW 3~below 4 million (450) 14.9 56.2 25.8 2.2 0.9 income KRW 4~below 5 million (522) 19.2 50.0 28.2 2.7 0.0
KRW 5~below 6 million (291) 21.6 50.2 25.8 1.7 0.7
Above KRW 6 million (674) 21.5 53.9 22.4 1.5 0.7
High (398) 23.9 54.0 20.1 1.5 0.5 Standard Mid (1476) 17.1 54.3 25.9 2.2 0.4 of living Low (1626) 18.3 50.6 28.0 2.2 0.9
117 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Table 27-2] When the youths came to learn about payment of youth basic income (based on 1st quarter) – Per region of residence [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
End of 2018 Between Jan. Apr. 2019 May 2019 (When the ~ Apr. 2019 1st registration 2nd extension No. of cases Others ordinance was (Preparation period period enacted) period) (Apr. 8 ~ Apr. 30) (May 1 ~ May 10)
All (City) (3500) 18.5 52.5 26.3 2.1 0.7
Suwon (363) 12.9 60.9 24.0 1.9 0.3
Seongnam (254) 58.3 25.2 10.2 1.2 5.1
Bucheon (261) 18.4 52.9 24.5 3.8 0.4
Anyang (185) 13.0 60.0 25.9 1.1 0.0
Ansan (239) 15.1 54.8 27.2 2.9 0.0
Yongin (270) 17.8 51.1 29.3 1.1 0.7
Pyeongtaek (131) 18.3 48.1 29.8 3.8 0.0
Gwangmyeong (96) 10.4 64.6 22.9 2.1 0.0
Siheung (144) 12.5 58.3 27.8 1.4 0.0
Gunpo (84) 21.4 46.4 29.8 1.2 1.2
Hwaseong (155) 15.5 58.7 25.2 0.6 0.0
Icheon (39) 15.4 59.0 23.1 2.6 0.0
Gimpo (85) 9.4 64.7 24.7 1.2 0.0
Gwangju (86) 23.3 46.5 27.9 2.3 0.0
Anseong (37) 2.7 51.4 40.5 5.4 0.0 Region of Hanam (43) 39.5 41.9 18.6 0.0 0.0 residence Uiwang (46) 8.7 56.5 32.6 2.2 0.0
Osan (53) 22.6 45.3 32.1 0.0 0.0
Gwacheon (20) 25.0 50.0 25.0 0.0 0.0
Yeoju (20) 25.0 40.0 35.0 0.0 0.0
Yangpyeong County (20) 5.0 60.0 30.0 5.0 0.0
Goyang (280) 12.9 55.4 27.1 3.9 0.7
Uijeongbu (130) 22.3 45.4 31.5 0.8 0.0
Namyangju (160) 14.4 53.1 30.6 1.9 0.0
Paju (96) 14.6 46.9 33.3 4.2 1.0
Guri (54) 20.4 55.6 22.2 1.9 0.0
Pocheon (35) 0.0 68.6 25.7 5.7 0.0
Yangju (48) 8.3 56.3 35.4 0.0 0.0
Dongducheon (26) 3.8 65.4 30.8 0.0 0.0
Gapyeong County (20) 10.0 50.0 40.0 0.0 0.0
Yeoncheon County (20) 10.0 50.0 30.0 0.0 10.0
118 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
9 Importance of promotion of youth basic income project
HHow important to you think promotion is for creating awareness Q on youth basic income project?
As for the opinion on the important of promotion of youth basic income project, 86.6% responded by saying that it was ‘Important’ (Very important: 42.9% + Quite important: 43.7%) which was higher than 1.9% who responded by saying that it was ‘Not important’ (Not so important: 1.5% + Not important at all: 0.4%).
[Figure 43] Importance of promotion of youth basic income project [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
Not Important important Not important 43.7 1.9% 42.9 Average Average Important 81.80 out 11.5% 86.6% of 100 points 11.5
0.4 1.5
Not Not so Average Quite Very important important important important at all
Analysis per characteristics
● As for the response ‘It is important’ per respondent characteristics, it was relatively high in female and with higher education level.
● As for the response, ‘It is important’ per region of residence, Dongducheon City (n=26) was the highest with 96.2% followed by Gapyeong County (95.0%, n=20) and Namyangju City (92.5%).
119 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Table 28-1] Importance of promotion of youth basic income project – Per respondent characteristics
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
Not [Average No. of Not so Quite Very [Not important Average [Average] [important] converted cases important important important important] at all to 100 pts]
All (3500) 0.4 1.5 11.5 43.7 42.9 1.9 11.5 86.6 81.80
Male (1221) 0.8 2.0 13.4 41.3 42.5 2.8 13.4 83.8 80.67 Gender Female (2279) 0.2 1.3 10.4 45.0 43.1 1.4 10.4 88.1 82.40
High graduate and below (500) 0.2 0.6 15.4 39.6 44.2 0.8 15.4 83.8 81.75 Educational University student (826) 0.7 2.3 11.5 44.9 40.6 3.0 11.5 85.5 80.57 background University graduate and above (2174) 0.3 1.4 10.6 44.2 43.5 1.7 10.6 87.7 82.28
Single (3414) 0.4 1.5 11.5 43.9 42.7 1.9 11.5 86.6 81.75 Marital Married (79) 0.0 1.3 13.9 36.7 48.1 1.3 13.9 84.8 82.91 status Others (7) 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 0.0 0.0 100.0 92.86
1-person household (324) 1.2 0.9 10.5 40.7 46.6 2.2 10.5 87.3 82.64
Married household (27) 0.0 0.0 7.4 37.0 55.6 0.0 7.4 92.6 87.04 Household Lives with children (37) 0.0 0.0 13.5 43.2 43.2 0.0 13.5 86.5 82.43 type Lives with parents (2846) 0.4 1.6 11.6 44.4 42.1 1.9 11.6 86.5 81.59
Others (266) 0.0 1.9 12.0 40.6 45.5 1.9 12.0 86.1 82.42
Student (with part-time job) (327) 0.9 2.1 9.5 41.3 46.2 3.1 9.5 87.5 82.42
Student (without part-time job) (438) 0.7 2.3 10.0 43.8 43.2 3.0 10.0 87.0 81.62
Current Unemployed (934) 0.1 1.8 12.1 46.6 39.4 1.9 12.1 86.0 80.84 identity status Soldier (32) 0.0 6.3 15.6 37.5 40.6 6.3 15.6 78.1 78.13
Employed (1607) 0.4 1.0 11.8 43.0 43.7 1.4 11.8 86.7 82.16
Others (162) 0.0 0.6 11.7 39.5 48.1 0.6 11.7 87.7 83.80
Below KRW 1 million (175) 0.6 4.6 20.0 34.9 40.0 5.1 20.0 74.9 77.29
KRW 1~below 2 million (546) 0.5 1.5 14.5 41.6 41.9 2.0 14.5 83.5 80.72
KRW 2~below 3 million (842) 1.0 0.7 10.5 45.1 42.8 1.7 10.5 87.9 82.01 Household KRW 3~below 4 million (450) 0.2 1.3 10.9 44.2 43.3 1.6 10.9 87.6 82.28 income KRW 4~below 5 million (522) 0.0 1.9 10.2 45.4 42.5 1.9 10.2 87.9 82.14
KRW 5~below 6 million (291) 0.3 1.4 10.0 44.7 43.6 1.7 10.0 88.3 82.47
Above KRW 6 million (674) 0.0 1.6 10.2 43.8 44.4 1.6 10.2 88.1 82.72
High (398) 0.5 3.0 9.8 43.2 43.5 3.5 9.8 86.7 81.53 Standard Mid (1476) 0.3 1.5 11.7 44.9 41.6 1.8 11.7 86.5 81.52 of living Low (1626) 0.5 1.2 11.7 42.7 44.0 1.7 11.7 86.7 82.12
120 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
[Table 28-2] Importance of promotion of youth basic income project – Per region of residence
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
Not [Average No. of Not so Quite Very [Not important Average [Average] [important] converted cases important important important important] at all to 100 pts]
All (City) (3500) 0.4 1.5 11.5 43.7 42.9 1.9 11.5 86.6 81.80
Suwon (363) 0.3 0.6 11.0 46.8 41.3 0.8 11.0 88.2 82.09
Seongnam (254) 1.2 1.6 14.6 46.9 35.8 2.8 14.6 82.7 78.64
Bucheon (261) 0.0 2.3 12.6 39.8 45.2 2.3 12.6 85.1 81.99
Anyang (185) 0.0 1.1 12.4 43.2 43.2 1.1 12.4 86.5 82.16
Ansan (239) 0.4 2.1 10.9 41.8 44.8 2.5 10.9 86.6 82.11
Yongin (270) 0.4 1.9 13.3 42.6 41.9 2.2 13.3 84.4 80.93
Pyeongtaek (131) 0.8 2.3 11.5 43.5 42.0 3.1 11.5 85.5 80.92
Gwangmyeong (96) 1.0 4.2 10.4 42.7 41.7 5.2 10.4 84.4 79.95
Siheung (144) 0.7 0.7 13.9 41.7 43.1 1.4 13.9 84.7 81.42
Gunpo (84) 0.0 2.4 10.7 50.0 36.9 2.4 10.7 86.9 80.36
Hwaseong (155) 0.6 1.3 12.3 37.4 48.4 1.9 12.3 85.8 82.90
Icheon (39) 0.0 2.6 12.8 51.3 33.3 2.6 12.8 84.6 78.85
Gimpo (85) 0.0 2.4 9.4 49.4 38.8 2.4 9.4 88.2 81.18
Gwangju (86) 0.0 1.2 9.3 45.3 44.2 1.2 9.3 89.5 83.14
Anseong (37) 0.0 0.0 10.8 40.5 48.6 0.0 10.8 89.2 84.46 Region of Hanam (43) 2.3 2.3 11.6 41.9 41.9 4.7 11.6 83.7 79.65 residence Uiwang (46) 2.2 0.0 8.7 39.1 50.0 2.2 8.7 89.1 83.70
Osan (53) 0.0 0.0 13.2 47.2 39.6 0.0 13.2 86.8 81.60
Gwacheon (20) 0.0 0.0 30.0 40.0 30.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 75.00
Yeoju (20) 0.0 0.0 15.0 30.0 55.0 0.0 15.0 85.0 85.00
Yangpyeong County (20) 0.0 0.0 10.0 45.0 45.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 83.75
Goyang (280) 0.4 1.8 8.9 39.6 49.3 2.1 8.9 88.9 83.93
Uijeongbu (130) 0.0 0.8 13.1 46.2 40.0 0.8 13.1 86.2 81.35
Namyangju (160) 0.0 1.3 6.3 45.6 46.9 1.3 6.3 92.5 84.53
Paju (96) 0.0 2.1 14.6 45.8 37.5 2.1 14.6 83.3 79.69
Guri (54) 1.9 3.7 5.6 37.0 51.9 5.6 5.6 88.9 83.33
Pocheon (35) 0.0 0.0 11.4 60.0 28.6 0.0 11.4 88.6 79.29
Yangju (48) 0.0 0.0 10.4 58.3 31.3 0.0 10.4 89.6 80.21
Dongducheon (26) 0.0 0.0 3.8 26.9 69.2 0.0 3.8 96.2 91.35
Gapyeong County (20) 0.0 0.0 5.0 55.0 40.0 0.0 5.0 95.0 83.75
Yeoncheon County (20) 0.0 0.0 10.0 40.0 50.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 85.00
121 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
How the youths came to learn about youth 10 basic income project (priority)
How did you come to learn about the youth basic income project? Q Please respond to 2 items only in order.
43.4% of the youths came to learn about the youth basic income project ‘Through people around them such as friends, parents and teachers’ followed by ‘Online advertisements’ (20.3%) and ‘Outdoor advertisements’ (11.3%).
[Figure 44] How the youths came to learn about youth basic income project (priority)
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
65.0 1st priority 44.1 1+2 priority
43.4 20.3 26.9 25.0 16.9 11.3 12.5 8.7 7.8 8.5 5.2 2.9 0.3 1.1
Through people Online Outdoor Mass media News articles News such as TV program Others around them advertisements advertisements advertisements (including TV news and on living such as friends, online media) radio news information parents and teachers
Analysis per characteristics
● As for the response, ‘Through people around them such as friends, parents and teachers’ per respondent characteristics, it was relatively high in male, university students, who were currently soldiers and in middle class in terms of standard of living. (based on 1st priority)
122 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
[Table 29-1-1] How the youths came to learn about youth basic income project (1st priority) – Per respondent characteristics [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
Through people News News such around articles TV program No. of Online Outdoor Mass media as TV news 1st priority them such (including on living Others cases advertisements advertisements advertisements and radio as friends, online information news parents and media) teachers
All (3500) 43.4 20.3 11.3 8.7 7.8 2.9 0.3 5.2
Male (1221) 44.1 18.9 8.2 9.9 10.5 4.6 0.4 3.4 Gender Female (2279) 43.0 21.1 13.0 8.1 6.4 2.0 0.2 6.1
High graduate and below (500) 43.2 26.2 10.4 8.6 4.4 2.0 0.2 5.0 Educational University student (826) 44.7 17.1 10.8 8.1 11.0 4.2 0.2 3.9 background University graduate and above (2174) 42.9 20.2 11.7 9.0 7.4 2.6 0.3 5.7
Single (3414) 43.5 20.2 11.3 8.7 7.9 2.9 0.2 5.2 Marital Married (79) 36.7 26.6 12.7 11.4 3.8 2.5 2.5 3.8 status Others (7) 42.9 42.9 14.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1-person household (324) 47.8 21.6 9.3 7.7 7.4 2.5 0.3 3.4
Married household (27) 48.1 29.6 7.4 3.7 3.7 3.7 0.0 3.7 Household Lives with children (37) 35.1 27.0 13.5 16.2 5.4 2.7 0.0 0.0 type Lives with parents (2846) 42.6 20.2 11.9 8.7 7.8 3.0 0.3 5.6
Others (266) 47.0 18.8 7.5 9.8 9.4 2.6 0.4 4.5
Student (with part-time job) (327) 42.8 18.0 12.8 10.1 8.6 2.4 0.6 4.6
Student (without part-time job) (438) 46.3 15.8 11.2 7.8 10.0 4.1 0.5 4.3
Current Unemployed (934) 44.2 19.8 11.1 7.6 8.8 3.0 0.1 5.4 identity status Soldier (32) 46.9 18.8 12.5 3.1 6.3 9.4 0.0 3.1 Employed (1607) 42.4 21.6 11.4 9.0 7.0 2.5 0.3 5.7
Others (162) 40.1 28.4 8.0 13.6 3.1 3.1 0.0 3.7
Below KRW 1 million (175) 37.1 25.1 11.4 12.6 6.9 2.3 1.1 3.4
KRW 1~below 2 million (546) 43.8 22.3 10.6 9.3 5.5 2.6 0.4 5.5
KRW 2~below 3 million (842) 41.9 21.4 11.9 8.4 8.6 2.9 0.2 4.8 Household KRW 3~below 4 million (450) 46.0 16.4 11.1 8.0 10.7 3.6 0.7 3.6 income KRW 4~below 5 million (522) 43.5 20.5 12.6 7.7 6.9 3.4 0.2 5.2
KRW 5~below 6 million (291) 39.9 21.3 11.7 10.3 5.5 2.7 0.0 8.6
Above KRW 6 million (674) 46.1 18.2 10.1 8.3 8.9 2.7 0.0 5.6
High (398) 41.0 17.1 11.3 10.6 10.8 2.5 0.3 6.5 Standard Mid (1476) 45.4 19.1 10.6 9.6 7.6 3.0 0.3 4.5 of living Low (1626) 42.1 22.3 12.0 7.5 7.3 3.0 0.3 5.5
123 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Table 29-1-2] How the youths came to learn about youth basic income project (1st priority) – Per region of residence [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
Through News people around News such articles TV program No. of them such Online Outdoor Mass media as TV news 1st priority (including on living Others cases as friends, advertisements advertisements advertisements and radio online information parents and news media) teachers
All (City) (3500) 43.4 20.3 11.3 8.7 7.8 2.9 0.3 5.2
Suwon (363) 44.1 20.1 12.7 7.7 7.2 2.5 0.6 5.2
Seongnam (254) 46.5 15.4 8.7 9.8 10.6 3.5 0.4 5.1
Bucheon (261) 44.4 19.2 10.0 7.3 8.0 2.3 0.4 8.4
Anyang (185) 48.6 16.8 8.6 8.1 9.7 3.2 0.5 4.3
Ansan (239) 38.5 26.8 11.7 9.6 8.4 2.5 0.4 2.1
Yongin (270) 42.6 21.1 8.9 10.7 8.1 5.2 0.0 3.3
Pyeongtaek (131) 42.0 30.5 3.8 10.7 5.3 1.5 0.0 6.1
Gwangmyeong (96) 49.0 22.9 8.3 8.3 4.2 2.1 0.0 5.2
Siheung (144) 54.2 18.1 6.9 4.9 6.9 2.8 0.7 5.6
Gunpo (84) 53.6 14.3 11.9 6.0 8.3 4.8 0.0 1.2
Hwaseong (155) 51.0 16.8 14.8 7.7 5.8 0.0 0.0 3.9
Icheon (39) 46.2 25.6 7.7 7.7 10.3 0.0 0.0 2.6
Gimpo (85) 41.2 15.3 20.0 7.1 3.5 2.4 0.0 10.6
Gwangju (86) 36.0 17.4 11.6 12.8 8.1 5.8 1.2 7.0
Anseong (37) 35.1 18.9 10.8 21.6 5.4 2.7 2.7 2.7 Region of Hanam (43) 18.6 18.6 20.9 11.6 14.0 4.7 0.0 11.6 residence Uiwang (46) 41.3 13.0 15.2 13.0 8.7 6.5 0.0 2.2
Osan (53) 45.3 22.6 22.6 3.8 3.8 0.0 0.0 1.9
Gwacheon (20) 25.0 25.0 0.0 30.0 10.0 10.0 0.0 0.0
Yeoju (20) 50.0 10.0 5.0 5.0 15.0 10.0 0.0 5.0
Yangpyeong County (20) 55.0 30.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 5.0 0.0 0.0
Goyang (280) 38.2 19.6 20.4 6.8 7.1 1.4 0.0 6.4
Uijeongbu (130) 36.2 23.8 8.5 10.8 9.2 4.6 0.0 6.9
Namyangju (160) 38.8 22.5 14.4 8.8 10.0 0.6 0.0 5.0
Paju (96) 38.5 25.0 11.5 10.4 8.3 2.1 0.0 4.2
Guri (54) 48.1 16.7 1.9 9.3 9.3 7.4 1.9 5.6
Pocheon (35) 45.7 31.4 8.6 8.6 5.7 0.0 0.0 0.0
Yangju (48) 47.9 14.6 8.3 6.3 12.5 2.1 0.0 8.3
Dongducheon (26) 50.0 30.8 3.8 0.0 0.0 7.7 0.0 7.7
Gapyeong County (20) 45.0 25.0 10.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 5.0
Yeoncheon County (20) 45.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 0.0 5.0 0.0 20.0
124 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
[Table 29-2-1] How the youths came to learn about youth basic income project (1+2 priority) – Per respondent characteristics [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
Through people News News such around articles TV program No. of Online Outdoor Mass media as TV news 1+2 priority them such (including on living Others cases advertisements advertisements advertisements and radio as friends, online information news parents and media) teachers
All (3500) 65.0 44.1 26.9 25.0 16.9 8.5 1.1 12.5
Male (1221) 63.9 45.3 20.9 28.6 19.1 12.4 1.8 8.0 Gender Female (2279) 65.6 43.5 30.1 23.0 15.8 6.5 0.7 14.8
High graduate and below (500) 65.0 50.2 26.8 20.2 16.8 7.6 1.4 12.0 Educational University student (826) 65.7 41.6 24.5 30.0 15.1 11.1 1.2 10.7 background University graduate and above (2174) 64.8 43.7 27.8 24.1 17.6 7.8 1.0 13.2
Single (3414) 65.2 43.9 26.8 25.0 16.8 8.6 1.1 12.6 Marital Married (79) 59.5 53.2 26.6 22.8 21.5 6.3 2.5 7.6 status Others (7) 42.9 57.1 42.9 28.6 14.3 14.3 0.0 0.0
1-person household (324) 66.0 47.8 23.5 28.1 15.4 7.7 0.9 10.5
Married household (27) 55.6 66.7 22.2 18.5 18.5 11.1 0.0 7.4 Household Lives with children (37) 59.5 54.1 29.7 29.7 21.6 2.7 0.0 2.7 type Lives with parents (2846) 64.6 43.3 28.2 24.2 17.0 8.8 1.2 12.7
Others (266) 70.3 44.4 16.9 29.7 16.9 7.1 0.4 14.3
Student (with part-time job) (327) 65.4 42.2 28.4 26.0 20.2 7.3 1.8 8.6
Student (without part-time job) (438) 65.3 41.6 24.9 29.9 13.9 11.9 0.9 11.6
Current Unemployed (934) 66.4 42.8 25.4 25.7 17.3 8.8 1.0 12.6 identity status Soldier (32) 65.6 53.1 15.6 25.0 12.5 15.6 3.1 9.4 Employed (1607) 64.6 45.1 28.4 23.4 16.6 7.4 1.0 13.5
Others (162) 59.9 50.6 24.7 21.0 19.8 10.5 1.9 11.7
Below KRW 1 million (175) 59.4 52.6 21.7 22.3 23.4 9.7 2.9 8.0
KRW 1~below 2 million (546) 63.9 46.2 26.6 20.1 19.4 8.6 1.3 13.9
KRW 2~below 3 million (842) 64.0 46.1 28.6 24.2 16.7 7.8 1.4 11.0 Household KRW 3~below 4 million (450) 66.9 42.7 26.4 26.7 15.8 8.9 1.3 11.3 income KRW 4~below 5 million (522) 67.2 41.2 25.9 26.4 16.5 8.0 0.8 14.0
KRW 5~below 6 million (291) 61.2 45.4 29.6 25.1 15.1 7.2 1.0 15.5
Above KRW 6 million (674) 67.4 40.5 26.1 28.2 15.3 9.8 0.3 12.5
High (398) 60.3 37.9 28.1 31.9 19.3 10.1 1.0 11.3 Standard Mid (1476) 65.6 42.8 27.0 24.7 17.8 9.0 1.2 12.0 of living Low (1626) 65.7 46.8 26.4 23.6 15.5 7.7 1.1 13.2
125 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Table 29-2-2] How the youths came to learn about youth basic income project (1+2 priority) – Per region of residence [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
Through News people around News such articles TV program No. of them such Online Outdoor Mass media as TV news 1+2 priority (including on living Others cases as friends, advertisements advertisements advertisements and radio online information parents and news media) teachers
All (City) (3500) 65.0 44.1 26.9 25.0 16.9 8.5 1.1 12.5
Suwon (363) 66.4 42.1 31.1 22.9 16.5 8.0 1.4 11.6
Seongnam (254) 70.1 36.6 22.4 28.3 17.3 11.0 2.0 12.2
Bucheon (261) 65.5 44.1 23.0 26.4 19.2 6.1 0.8 14.9
Anyang (185) 64.9 41.1 21.1 35.1 15.1 8.1 1.6 13.0
Ansan (239) 69.9 47.7 23.0 22.2 15.1 9.2 2.5 10.5
Yongin (270) 62.6 45.9 21.1 25.2 22.2 11.5 0.7 10.7
Pyeongtaek (131) 64.1 51.9 11.5 25.2 17.6 11.5 0.8 17.6
Gwangmyeong (96) 66.7 42.7 30.2 17.7 18.8 10.4 0.0 13.5
Siheung (144) 81.3 44.4 22.2 21.5 11.1 6.9 1.4 11.1
Gunpo (84) 67.9 48.8 26.2 29.8 9.5 7.1 0.0 10.7
Hwaseong (155) 65.8 51.6 34.2 21.3 11.0 5.2 0.6 10.3
Icheon (39) 66.7 53.8 12.8 30.8 23.1 5.1 2.6 5.1
Gimpo (85) 68.2 30.6 38.8 23.5 15.3 3.5 0.0 20.0
Gwangju (86) 54.7 43.0 27.9 29.1 16.3 11.6 1.2 16.3
Anseong (37) 56.8 45.9 21.6 18.9 29.7 16.2 2.7 8.1 Region of Hanam (43) 37.2 34.9 39.5 37.2 18.6 16.3 0.0 16.3 residence Uiwang (46) 60.9 34.8 34.8 30.4 15.2 13.0 4.3 6.5
Osan (53) 71.7 43.4 43.4 18.9 13.2 3.8 0.0 5.7
Gwacheon (20) 35.0 60.0 10.0 30.0 50.0 15.0 0.0 0.0
Yeoju (20) 70.0 35.0 5.0 35.0 20.0 15.0 5.0 15.0
Yangpyeong County (20) 75.0 55.0 20.0 10.0 25.0 5.0 0.0 10.0
Goyang (280) 62.5 43.2 43.2 21.1 13.6 4.3 0.4 11.8
Uijeongbu (130) 55.4 43.1 23.8 31.5 22.3 10.0 1.5 12.3
Namyangju (160) 60.0 50.6 28.1 24.4 13.1 11.3 0.6 11.9
Paju (96) 59.4 43.8 31.3 25.0 18.8 7.3 1.0 13.5
Guri (54) 66.7 35.2 27.8 22.2 24.1 13.0 1.9 9.3
Pocheon (35) 62.9 54.3 20.0 14.3 31.4 2.9 0.0 14.3
Yangju (48) 70.8 41.7 29.2 25.0 8.3 4.2 0.0 20.8
Dongducheon (26) 69.2 50.0 7.7 19.2 19.2 11.5 0.0 23.1
Gapyeong County (20) 55.0 65.0 20.0 25.0 10.0 10.0 0.0 15.0
Yeoncheon County (20) 75.0 30.0 30.0 20.0 15.0 5.0 0.0 25.0
126 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
11 Social interest arising from receipt of youth basic income
How did your level of interest in the following items change after receiving youth Q basic income? Please respond respectively regarding the following items.
As for the question on the change in the level of social interest after receiving youth basic income, ‘Interest in economic freedom increased’ was the highest with 69.13 points followed by ‘Interest in resolving social inequality increased’ (63.69 points) and ‘Interest in human right expansion increased’ (60.02 points).
[Figure 45] Social interest arising from receipt of youth basic income [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: Point]
69.13
63.69 60.02
Increase in human right Interest in economic Interest in resolving social expansion increased freedom increased inequality increased
127 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Table 30-1] Social interest arising from receipt of youth basic income – Per respondent characteristics
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: Point]
Increase in human Interest in resolving Interest in economic No. of cases right expansion social inequality freedom increased increased increased
All (3500) 60.02 69.13 63.69
Male (1221) 59.97 69.12 63.00 Gender Female (2279) 60.05 69.13 64.05
High graduate and below (500) 60.65 69.05 63.75 Educational University student (826) 59.17 70.16 64.01 background University graduate and above (2174) 60.20 68.76 63.55
Single (3414) 60.05 69.17 63.76 Marital Married (79) 58.54 66.14 59.18 status Others (7) 60.71 82.14 78.57
1-person household (324) 61.27 70.45 64.43
Married household (27) 55.56 64.81 56.48 Household Lives with children (37) 59.46 64.86 58.78 type Lives with parents (2846) 60.05 69.17 63.89
Others (266) 58.74 68.14 62.03
Student (with part-time job) (327) 63.23 72.09 68.12
Student (without part-time job) (438) 56.85 67.24 61.19
Current Unemployed (934) 60.28 69.97 64.27 identity status Soldier (32) 55.47 64.84 62.50
Employed (1607) 60.07 68.61 63.22
Others (162) 61.11 69.44 62.96
Below KRW 1 million (175) 59.43 67.00 60.57
KRW 1~below 2 million (546) 62.13 70.01 64.79
KRW 2~below 3 million (842) 61.43 69.74 64.25 Household KRW 3~below 4 million (450) 60.28 71.44 65.22 income KRW 4~below 5 million (522) 60.73 70.02 64.94
KRW 5~below 6 million (291) 57.30 67.01 61.25
Above KRW 6 million (674) 57.16 66.88 61.94
High (398) 56.22 65.26 60.49 Standard Mid (1476) 59.30 68.82 63.50 of living Low (1626) 61.61 70.36 64.64
128 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
[Table 30-2] Social interest arising from receipt of youth basic income – Per region of residence
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: Point]
Increase in human Interest in resolving Interest in economic No. of cases right expansion social inequality freedom increased increased increased
All (City) (3500) 60.02 69.13 63.69
Suwon (363) 59.50 68.80 63.43
Seongnam (254) 57.58 67.52 61.22
Bucheon (261) 60.25 67.05 61.49
Anyang (185) 61.49 71.35 66.89
Ansan (239) 62.45 72.18 64.96
Yongin (270) 58.52 67.31 62.87
Pyeongtaek (131) 63.93 71.37 66.22
Gwangmyeong (96) 59.11 70.05 67.19
Siheung (144) 59.03 68.58 63.02
Gunpo (84) 59.23 67.26 61.61
Hwaseong (155) 58.71 68.71 61.45
Icheon (39) 55.77 60.26 58.33
Gimpo (85) 61.18 67.35 64.41
Gwangju (86) 56.69 63.66 59.88
Anseong (37) 62.84 70.95 64.86 Region of Hanam (43) 63.37 71.51 66.28 residence Uiwang (46) 57.61 69.57 66.30
Osan (53) 59.43 66.98 60.38
Gwacheon (20) 66.25 77.50 68.75
Yeoju (20) 63.75 73.75 67.50
Yangpyeong County (20) 62.50 68.75 68.75
Goyang (280) 59.91 71.96 64.82
Uijeongbu (130) 59.04 66.92 61.15
Namyangju (160) 61.41 71.09 66.09
Paju (96) 58.59 66.15 59.38
Guri (54) 63.89 75.00 74.54
Pocheon (35) 62.14 66.43 62.86
Yangju (48) 61.46 69.27 63.54
Dongducheon (26) 62.50 76.92 67.31
Gapyeong County (20) 53.75 67.50 62.50
Yeoncheon County (20) 63.75 71.25 67.50
129 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
1) Interest in human right expansion
As for the question on whether interest in human right expansion had increased, 46.5% responded by saying ‘Yes’ (Very so: 12.1% + Mostly so: 34.4%) which was higher than 14.3% who responded by saying ‘Not so’ (Not so much: 10.2% + Not at all: 4.1%).
[Figure 46] Interest in human right expansion [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
Not so Yes Not so 14.3% 39.2 34.4 Average Yes 60.02 out 46.5% of 100 points Average 12.1 39.2% 10.2 4.1
Not at all Not so much Average Mostly so Very so
Analysis per characteristics
● As for the response, ‘Yes’ per respondent characteristics, it was relatively high in male, university students, who were currently students (with part-time jobs) and with lower standard of living.
● As for the response, ‘Yes’ per region of residence, Gwacheon City was the highest with 65.0% followed by Hanam City (60.5%) and Dongducheon City (53.8%, n=26).
130 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
[Table 31-1] Interest in human right expansion – Per respondent characteristics
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
[Average No. of Not at Not so Mostly Very Average [No] [Average] [Quite so] converted cases all much so so to 100 pts]
All (3500) 4.1 10.2 39.2 34.4 12.1 14.3 39.2 46.5 60.02
Male (1221) 5.8 9.6 37.5 33.1 14.0 15.4 37.5 47.1 59.97 Gender Female (2279) 3.2 10.6 40.1 35.1 11.1 13.8 40.1 46.1 60.05
High graduate and below (500) 3.4 7.4 44.8 32.0 12.4 10.8 44.8 44.4 60.65 Educational University student (826) 5.3 11.6 35.7 35.7 11.6 16.9 35.7 47.3 59.17 background University graduate and above (2174) 3.8 10.3 39.2 34.4 12.2 14.2 39.2 46.6 60.20
Single (3414) 4.1 10.3 39.2 34.2 12.2 14.4 39.2 46.5 60.05 Marital Married (79) 6.3 6.3 41.8 38.0 7.6 12.7 41.8 45.6 58.54 status Others (7) 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 60.71
1-person household (324) 4.9 9.3 37.0 33.3 15.4 14.2 37.0 48.8 61.27
Married household (27) 11.1 3.7 48.1 25.9 11.1 14.8 48.1 37.0 55.56 Household Lives with children (37) 5.4 5.4 40.5 43.2 5.4 10.8 40.5 48.6 59.46 type Lives with parents (2846) 3.9 10.6 38.9 34.6 12.0 14.5 38.9 46.6 60.05
Others (266) 4.9 8.3 44.0 32.7 10.2 13.2 44.0 42.9 58.74
Student (with part-time job) (327) 4.0 11.0 31.2 35.8 18.0 15.0 31.2 53.8 63.23
Student (without part-time job) (438) 6.8 12.6 35.4 36.8 8.4 19.4 35.4 45.2 56.85
Current Unemployed (934) 3.6 10.2 40.0 33.7 12.4 13.8 40.0 46.1 60.28 identity status Soldier (32) 0.0 25.0 31.3 40.6 3.1 25.0 31.3 43.8 55.47
Employed (1607) 3.9 9.5 41.3 33.4 12.0 13.3 41.3 45.4 60.07
Others (162) 3.1 7.4 42.0 37.0 10.5 10.5 42.0 47.5 61.11
Below KRW 1 million (175) 5.1 10.9 38.9 31.4 13.7 16.0 38.9 45.1 59.43
KRW 1~below 2 million (546) 1.6 7.9 41.9 37.4 11.2 9.5 41.9 48.5 62.13
KRW 2~below 3 million (842) 3.1 9.3 39.0 36.2 12.5 12.4 39.0 48.7 61.43 Household KRW 3~below 4 million (450) 4.2 10.7 38.0 34.0 13.1 14.9 38.0 47.1 60.28 income KRW 4~below 5 million (522) 4.4 9.8 38.9 32.4 14.6 14.2 38.9 46.9 60.73
KRW 5~below 6 million (291) 5.5 10.7 41.2 34.4 8.2 16.2 41.2 42.6 57.30
Above KRW 6 million (674) 6.2 13.1 37.5 32.2 11.0 19.3 37.5 43.2 57.16
High (398) 8.8 15.6 30.7 31.9 13.1 24.4 30.7 45.0 56.22 Standard Mid (1476) 4.1 10.7 39.8 34.9 10.6 14.8 39.8 45.5 59.30 of living Low (1626) 3.0 8.5 40.8 34.5 13.2 11.5 40.8 47.7 61.61
131 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Table 31-2] Interest in human right expansion – Per region of residence
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
[Average No. of Not at Not so Mostly Very Average [No] [Average] [Quite so] converted cases all much so so to 100 pts]
All (City) (3500) 4.1 10.2 39.2 34.4 12.1 14.3 39.2 46.5 60.02
Suwon (363) 4.4 12.1 35.8 36.4 11.3 16.5 35.8 47.7 59.50
Seongnam (254) 5.9 9.8 40.6 35.4 8.3 15.7 40.6 43.7 57.58
Bucheon (261) 3.8 9.6 40.2 34.5 11.9 13.4 40.2 46.4 60.25
Anyang (185) 3.8 9.7 36.8 36.2 13.5 13.5 36.8 49.7 61.49
Ansan (239) 4.6 5.9 38.5 37.2 13.8 10.5 38.5 51.0 62.45
Yongin (270) 6.7 8.1 40.0 34.8 10.4 14.8 40.0 45.2 58.52
Pyeongtaek (131) 3.1 6.9 38.2 35.1 16.8 9.9 38.2 51.9 63.93
Gwangmyeong (96) 2.1 21.9 27.1 35.4 13.5 24.0 27.1 49.0 59.11
Siheung (144) 2.1 13.9 41.0 31.9 11.1 16.0 41.0 43.1 59.03
Gunpo (84) 7.1 4.8 46.4 27.4 14.3 11.9 46.4 41.7 59.23
Hwaseong (155) 5.2 9.0 43.9 29.7 12.3 14.2 43.9 41.9 58.71
Icheon (39) 2.6 15.4 46.2 28.2 7.7 17.9 46.2 35.9 55.77
Gimpo (85) 2.4 16.5 30.6 35.3 15.3 18.8 30.6 50.6 61.18
Gwangju (86) 4.7 12.8 43.0 30.2 9.3 17.4 43.0 39.5 56.69
Anseong (37) 0.0 13.5 37.8 32.4 16.2 13.5 37.8 48.6 62.84 Region of Hanam (43) 7.0 7.0 25.6 46.5 14.0 14.0 25.6 60.5 63.37 residence Uiwang (46) 8.7 10.9 34.8 32.6 13.0 19.6 34.8 45.7 57.61
Osan (53) 5.7 5.7 43.4 35.8 9.4 11.3 43.4 45.3 59.43
Gwacheon (20) 5.0 10.0 20.0 45.0 20.0 15.0 20.0 65.0 66.25
Yeoju (20) 0.0 5.0 45.0 40.0 10.0 5.0 45.0 50.0 63.75
Yangpyeong County (20) 0.0 10.0 45.0 30.0 15.0 10.0 45.0 45.0 62.50
Goyang (280) 3.6 11.4 39.3 33.2 12.5 15.0 39.3 45.7 59.91
Uijeongbu (130) 4.6 9.2 43.8 30.0 12.3 13.8 43.8 42.3 59.04
Namyangju (160) 3.1 10.0 38.8 34.4 13.8 13.1 38.8 48.1 61.41
Paju (96) 1.0 15.6 38.5 37.5 7.3 16.7 38.5 44.8 58.59
Guri (54) 5.6 7.4 35.2 29.6 22.2 13.0 35.2 51.9 63.89
Pocheon (35) 0.0 8.6 45.7 34.3 11.4 8.6 45.7 45.7 62.14
Yangju (48) 0.0 4.2 56.3 29.2 10.4 4.2 56.3 39.6 61.46
Dongducheon (26) 0.0 15.4 30.8 42.3 11.5 15.4 30.8 53.8 62.50
Gapyeong County (20) 5.0 10.0 50.0 35.0 0.0 15.0 50.0 35.0 53.75
Yeoncheon County (20) 0.0 0.0 55.0 35.0 10.0 0.0 55.0 45.0 63.75
132 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
2) Interest in economic freedom
As for the question on whether interest in economic freedom had increased, 66.6% responded by saying ‘Yes’ (Very so: 21.9% + Mostly so: 44.7%) which was higher than 9.1% who responded by saying ‘Not so’ (Not so much: 6.3% + Not at all: 2.9%).
[Figure 47] Interest in economic freedom [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
Not so Yes
Not so 44.7 9.1%
Average Yes 69.13 out 66.6% of 100 Average 24.3 21.9 points 24.3%
6.3 2.9
Not at all Not so much Average Mostly so Very so
Analysis per characteristics
● As for the response, 'Yes' per respondent characteristics, it was relatively high in male, university students, who were currently students (with part-time job) and with lower standard of living.
● As for the response 'Yes' per region of residence, Dongducheon City (n=26) was the highest with 80.8% followed by Guri City (75.9%), Gwancheon City and Yeoju City (75.0%, n=20 respectively).
133 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Table 32-1] Interest in economic freedom – Per respondent characteristics
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
[Average No. of Not at Not so Mostly Very Average [No] [Average] [Quite so] converted cases all much so so to 100 pts]
All (3500) 2.9 6.3 24.3 44.7 21.9 9.1 24.3 66.6 69.13
Male (1221) 4.3 5.3 23.7 43.2 23.6 9.6 23.7 66.7 69.12 Gender Female (2279) 2.1 6.8 24.6 45.5 21.0 8.9 24.6 66.5 69.13
High graduate and below (500) 2.0 4.0 30.4 43.0 20.6 6.0 30.4 63.6 69.05 Educational University student (826) 3.8 5.9 19.7 47.1 23.5 9.7 19.7 70.6 70.16 background University graduate and above (2174) 2.7 6.9 24.6 44.2 21.6 9.7 24.6 65.8 68.76
Single (3414) 2.9 6.3 24.2 44.7 22.0 9.1 24.2 66.7 69.17 Marital Married (79) 2.5 7.6 29.1 44.3 16.5 10.1 29.1 60.8 66.14 status Others (7) 0.0 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 0.0 14.3 85.7 82.14
1-person household (324) 2.8 6.2 22.2 44.1 24.7 9.0 22.2 68.8 70.45
Married household (27) 3.7 11.1 29.6 33.3 22.2 14.8 29.6 55.6 64.81 Household Lives with children (37) 2.7 5.4 32.4 48.6 10.8 8.1 32.4 59.5 64.86 type Lives with parents (2846) 2.9 6.3 24.1 44.8 22.0 9.2 24.1 66.8 69.17
Others (266) 2.6 6.0 27.1 44.7 19.5 8.6 27.1 64.3 68.14
Student (with part-time job) (327) 3.1 5.8 17.4 47.1 26.6 8.9 17.4 73.7 72.09
Student (without part-time job) (438) 4.8 7.8 22.4 43.8 21.2 12.6 22.4 65.1 67.24
Current Unemployed (934) 2.4 6.2 23.3 45.4 22.7 8.6 23.3 68.1 69.97 identity status Soldier (32) 3.1 6.3 34.4 40.6 15.6 9.4 34.4 56.3 64.84
Employed (1607) 2.6 6.3 25.9 44.4 20.8 8.9 25.9 65.2 68.61
Others (162) 2.5 3.7 29.6 42.0 22.2 6.2 29.6 64.2 69.44
Below KRW 1 million (175) 3.4 5.7 30.3 40.6 20.0 9.1 30.3 60.6 67.00
KRW 1~below 2 million (546) 0.9 5.9 26.0 46.7 20.5 6.8 26.0 67.2 70.01
KRW 2~below 3 million (842) 2.5 5.8 24.8 43.9 22.9 8.3 24.8 66.9 69.74 Household KRW 3~below 4 million (450) 2.7 5.1 21.8 44.7 25.8 7.8 21.8 70.4 71.44 income KRW 4~below 5 million (522) 3.3 6.1 20.9 46.7 23.0 9.4 20.9 69.7 70.02
KRW 5~below 6 million (291) 3.4 6.9 25.1 47.4 17.2 10.3 25.1 64.6 67.01
Above KRW 6 million (674) 4.3 8.0 24.5 42.3 20.9 12.3 24.5 63.2 66.88
High (398) 6.8 10.1 20.4 41.0 21.9 16.8 20.4 62.8 65.26 Standard Mid (1476) 2.8 6.3 24.1 46.2 20.5 9.1 24.1 66.7 68.82 of living Low (1626) 1.9 5.4 25.3 44.2 23.2 7.3 25.3 67.4 70.36
134 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
[Table 32-2] Interest in economic freedom – Per region of residence
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
[Average No. of Not at Not so Mostly Very Average [No] [Average] [Quite so] converted cases all much so so to 100 pts]
All (City) (3500) 2.9 6.3 24.3 44.7 21.9 9.1 24.3 66.6 69.13
Suwon (363) 3.3 5.2 25.3 45.2 20.9 8.5 25.3 66.1 68.80
Seongnam (254) 4.3 7.5 26.4 37.4 24.4 11.8 26.4 61.8 67.52
Bucheon (261) 2.7 8.8 25.7 43.3 19.5 11.5 25.7 62.8 67.05
Anyang (185) 2.2 5.4 20.5 48.6 23.2 7.6 20.5 71.9 71.35
Ansan (239) 1.7 3.3 24.7 45.2 25.1 5.0 24.7 70.3 72.18
Yongin (270) 5.2 6.3 23.7 43.7 21.1 11.5 23.7 64.8 67.31
Pyeongtaek (131) 2.3 5.3 22.1 45.0 25.2 7.6 22.1 70.2 71.37
Gwangmyeong (96) 1.0 11.5 21.9 37.5 28.1 12.5 21.9 65.6 70.05
Siheung (144) 1.4 8.3 22.9 49.3 18.1 9.7 22.9 67.4 68.58
Gunpo (84) 8.3 2.4 26.2 38.1 25.0 10.7 26.2 63.1 67.26
Hwaseong (155) 2.6 7.1 24.5 44.5 21.3 9.7 24.5 65.8 68.71
Icheon (39) 2.6 12.8 33.3 43.6 7.7 15.4 33.3 51.3 60.26
Gimpo (85) 3.5 7.1 22.4 50.6 16.5 10.6 22.4 67.1 67.35
Gwangju (86) 4.7 10.5 26.7 41.9 16.3 15.1 26.7 58.1 63.66
Anseong (37) 0.0 5.4 24.3 51.4 18.9 5.4 24.3 70.3 70.95 Region of Hanam (43) 2.3 7.0 16.3 51.2 23.3 9.3 16.3 74.4 71.51 residence Uiwang (46) 8.7 4.3 15.2 43.5 28.3 13.0 15.2 71.7 69.57
Osan (53) 3.8 1.9 34.0 43.4 17.0 5.7 34.0 60.4 66.98
Gwacheon (20) 0.0 5.0 20.0 35.0 40.0 5.0 20.0 75.0 77.50
Yeoju (20) 0.0 5.0 20.0 50.0 25.0 5.0 20.0 75.0 73.75
Yangpyeong County (20) 0.0 10.0 35.0 25.0 30.0 10.0 35.0 55.0 68.75
Goyang (280) 2.1 5.7 20.4 45.7 26.1 7.9 20.4 71.8 71.96
Uijeongbu (130) 2.3 6.2 27.7 49.2 14.6 8.5 27.7 63.8 66.92
Namyangju (160) 1.3 5.0 23.8 48.1 21.9 6.3 23.8 70.0 71.09
Paju (96) 3.1 7.3 26.0 49.0 14.6 10.4 26.0 63.5 66.15
Guri (54) 3.7 5.6 14.8 38.9 37.0 9.3 14.8 75.9 75.00
Pocheon (35) 0.0 5.7 37.1 42.9 14.3 5.7 37.1 57.1 66.43
Yangju (48) 0.0 4.2 33.3 43.8 18.8 4.2 33.3 62.5 69.27
Dongducheon (26) 0.0 3.8 15.4 50.0 30.8 3.8 15.4 80.8 76.92
Gapyeong County (20) 0.0 10.0 20.0 60.0 10.0 10.0 20.0 70.0 67.50
Yeoncheon County (20) 0.0 0.0 35.0 45.0 20.0 0.0 35.0 65.0 71.25
135 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
3) Interest in resolving social inequality
As for the question on whether interest in resolving social inequality had increased, 54.0% responded by saying ‘Yes’ (Very so: 17.0% + Mostly so: 37.0%) which was higher than 12.1% who responded by saying ‘Not so’ (Not so much: 12.1% + Not at all: 4.1%).
[Figure 48] Interest in resolving social inequality [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
Not so Yes
Not so 12.1% 37.0 Average 33.9 Yes 63.69out 54.0% of 100 17.0 points Average 33.9% 8.1 4.1
Not at all Not so much Average Mostly so Very so
Analysis per characteristics
● As for the response, 'Yes' per respondent characteristics, it was relatively high in female, university students, who were currently students (with part-time jobs) and with lower standard of living.
● As for the response 'Yes' per region of residence, Guri City was the highest with 75.9% followed by Yeoju City and Yangpyeong County (70.0%, n=20 respectively) and Anyang City (61.6%).
136 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
[Table 33-1] Interest in resolving social inequality – Per respondent characteristics
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
[Average No. of Not at Not so Mostly Very Average [No] [Average] [Quite so] converted cases all much so so to 100 pts]
All (3500) 4.1 8.1 33.9 37.0 17.0 12.1 33.9 54.0 63.69
Male (1221) 6.1 7.5 33.3 34.3 18.8 13.7 33.3 53.1 63.00 Gender Female (2279) 2.9 8.4 34.2 38.4 16.0 11.3 34.2 54.5 64.05
High graduate and below (500) 2.8 6.6 39.6 34.8 16.2 9.4 39.6 51.0 63.75 Educational University student (826) 5.0 8.8 29.5 38.5 18.2 13.8 29.5 56.7 64.01 background University graduate and above (2174) 4.0 8.1 34.2 36.9 16.7 12.1 34.2 53.6 63.55
Single (3414) 4.0 8.2 33.7 36.9 17.2 12.2 33.7 54.1 63.76 Marital Married (79) 6.3 5.1 41.8 39.2 7.6 11.4 41.8 46.8 59.18 status Others (7) 0.0 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 0.0 14.3 85.7 78.57
1-person household (324) 5.6 6.8 31.2 37.3 19.1 12.3 31.2 56.5 64.43
Married household (27) 7.4 11.1 40.7 29.6 11.1 18.5 40.7 40.7 56.48 Household Lives with children (37) 5.4 2.7 45.9 43.2 2.7 8.1 45.9 45.9 58.78 type Lives with parents (2846) 3.7 8.5 33.5 37.1 17.1 12.2 33.5 54.3 63.89
Others (266) 5.6 5.6 38.7 35.0 15.0 11.3 38.7 50.0 62.03
Student (with part-time job) (327) 3.4 6.7 25.4 43.1 21.4 10.1 25.4 64.5 68.12
Student (without part-time job) (438) 5.3 10.7 33.8 34.5 15.8 16.0 33.8 50.2 61.19
Current Unemployed (934) 3.7 8.2 32.8 37.7 17.6 12.0 32.8 55.2 64.27 identity status Soldier (32) 3.1 9.4 28.1 53.1 6.3 12.5 28.1 59.4 62.50
Employed (1607) 4.2 7.6 36.0 35.6 16.6 11.8 36.0 52.2 63.22
Others (162) 3.1 7.4 37.7 38.3 13.6 10.5 37.7 51.9 62.96
Below KRW 1 million (175) 6.9 6.3 38.9 33.7 14.3 13.1 38.9 48.0 60.57
KRW 1~below 2 million (546) 2.7 7.1 34.6 39.2 16.3 9.9 34.6 55.5 64.79
KRW 2~below 3 million (842) 3.3 7.4 34.3 39.0 16.0 10.7 34.3 55.0 64.25 Household KRW 3~below 4 million (450) 4.2 6.7 33.3 35.6 20.2 10.9 33.3 55.8 65.22 income KRW 4~below 5 million (522) 4.0 7.5 32.2 37.4 19.0 11.5 32.2 56.3 64.94
KRW 5~below 6 million (291) 4.5 10.0 35.4 36.4 13.7 14.4 35.4 50.2 61.25
Above KRW 6 million (674) 5.0 10.8 32.5 34.6 17.1 15.9 32.5 51.6 61.94
High (398) 8.3 10.3 29.9 34.2 17.3 18.6 29.9 51.5 60.49 Standard Mid (1476) 3.1 9.2 34.1 37.6 15.9 12.3 34.1 53.5 63.50 of living Low (1626) 3.9 6.5 34.6 37.1 17.8 10.4 34.6 55.0 64.64
137 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Table 33-2] Interest in resolving social inequality – Per region of residence
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
[Average No. of Not at Not so Mostly Very Average [No] [Average] [Quite so] converted cases all much so so to 100 pts]
All (City) (3500) 4.1 8.1 33.9 37.0 17.0 12.1 33.9 54.0 63.69
Suwon (363) 4.7 8.8 32.8 35.5 18.2 13.5 32.8 53.7 63.43
Seongnam (254) 4.3 12.2 33.9 33.5 16.1 16.5 33.9 49.6 61.22
Bucheon (261) 5.0 10.7 33.0 36.0 15.3 15.7 33.0 51.3 61.49
Anyang (185) 2.2 5.9 30.3 45.4 16.2 8.1 30.3 61.6 66.89
Ansan (239) 2.9 5.9 36.0 38.9 16.3 8.8 36.0 55.2 64.96
Yongin (270) 6.7 6.7 32.2 37.4 17.0 13.3 32.2 54.4 62.87
Pyeongtaek (131) 3.1 6.9 32.1 38.2 19.8 9.9 32.1 58.0 66.22
Gwangmyeong (96) 2.1 7.3 31.3 38.5 20.8 9.4 31.3 59.4 67.19
Siheung (144) 2.8 9.0 37.5 34.7 16.0 11.8 37.5 50.7 63.02
Gunpo (84) 7.1 8.3 33.3 33.3 17.9 15.5 33.3 51.2 61.61
Hwaseong (155) 7.1 5.8 35.5 37.4 14.2 12.9 35.5 51.6 61.45
Icheon (39) 0.0 12.8 46.2 35.9 5.1 12.8 46.2 41.0 58.33
Gimpo (85) 3.5 7.1 35.3 36.5 17.6 10.6 35.3 54.1 64.41
Gwangju (86) 4.7 9.3 40.7 32.6 12.8 14.0 40.7 45.3 59.88
Anseong (37) 0.0 2.7 51.4 29.7 16.2 2.7 51.4 45.9 64.86 Region of Hanam (43) 2.3 9.3 30.2 37.2 20.9 11.6 30.2 58.1 66.28 residence Uiwang (46) 6.5 4.3 28.3 39.1 21.7 10.9 28.3 60.9 66.30
Osan (53) 5.7 7.5 41.5 30.2 15.1 13.2 41.5 45.3 60.38
Gwacheon (20) 0.0 5.0 40.0 30.0 25.0 5.0 40.0 55.0 68.75
Yeoju (20) 0.0 10.0 20.0 60.0 10.0 10.0 20.0 70.0 67.50
Yangpyeong County (20) 0.0 15.0 15.0 50.0 20.0 15.0 15.0 70.0 68.75
Goyang (280) 3.2 8.9 32.9 35.4 19.6 12.1 32.9 55.0 64.82
Uijeongbu (130) 5.4 7.7 38.5 33.8 14.6 13.1 38.5 48.5 61.15
Namyangju (160) 4.4 6.3 29.4 40.6 19.4 10.6 29.4 60.0 66.09
Paju (96) 3.1 12.5 35.4 41.7 7.3 15.6 35.4 49.0 59.38
Guri (54) 3.7 5.6 14.8 40.7 35.2 9.3 14.8 75.9 74.54
Pocheon (35) 2.9 2.9 45.7 37.1 11.4 5.7 45.7 48.6 62.86
Yangju (48) 2.1 6.3 39.6 39.6 12.5 8.3 39.6 52.1 63.54
Dongducheon (26) 0.0 7.7 34.6 38.5 19.2 7.7 34.6 57.7 67.31
Gapyeong County (20) 5.0 10.0 30.0 40.0 15.0 15.0 30.0 55.0 62.50
Yeoncheon County (20) 0.0 0.0 55.0 20.0 25.0 0.0 55.0 45.0 67.50
138 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
Change in awareness arising from receipt 12 of youth basic income
How did the awareness on the following items change arising from receipt of Q youth basic income? Please respond to the following items respectively.
As for the question on change in awareness arising from receipt of youth basic income, ‘Awareness on the role of nation/local government’ was the highest with 66.29 points followed by ‘Awareness on definition of family’ (60.01 points)‘ and ‘Awareness on positive attitude towards life’ (59.64 points).
[Figure 49] Change in awareness arising from receipt of youth basic income
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: Point]
66.29
59.64 60.01 56.89
Awareness on future Attitude towards life Awareness on the definition Awareness on the role of dream changed positively changed positively of family changed positively nation/local government changed positively
139 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Table 34-1] Change in awareness arising from receipt of youth basic income – Per respondent characteristics [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: Point]
Awareness on Awareness on Attitude towards Awareness on the No. of future dream the role of nation/ life changed definition of family cases changed local government positively changed positively positively changed positively
All (3500) 56.89 59.64 60.01 66.29
Male (1221) 58.29 60.24 61.83 65.40 Gender Female (2279) 56.14 59.32 59.03 66.76
High graduate and below (500) 56.75 59.70 61.20 64.40 Educational University student (826) 57.48 59.69 59.44 66.86 background University graduate and above (2174) 56.70 59.61 59.95 66.50
Single (3414) 56.85 59.63 59.97 66.25 Marital Married (79) 57.91 59.18 61.71 66.14 status Others (7) 64.29 71.43 60.71 85.71
1-person household (324) 57.18 60.49 58.87 68.83
Married household (27) 59.26 65.74 61.11 67.59 Household Lives with children (37) 54.73 52.70 59.46 62.84 type Lives with parents (2846) 56.89 59.64 60.10 65.98
Others (266) 56.67 59.02 60.34 66.82
Student (with part-time job) (327) 61.01 63.23 63.69 69.88
Student (without part-time job) (438) 55.94 57.48 57.82 65.18
Current Unemployed (934) 56.53 59.82 58.46 66.81 identity status Soldier (32) 55.47 57.03 58.59 64.06
Employed (1607) 56.52 59.43 60.83 66.15
Others (162) 57.25 59.88 59.57 60.80
Below KRW 1 million (175) 55.14 57.86 57.86 61.57
KRW 1~below 2 million (546) 57.28 59.25 60.53 64.97
KRW 2~below 3 million (842) 57.99 60.84 61.28 67.76 Household KRW 3~below 4 million (450) 58.44 61.78 61.06 68.44 income KRW 4~below 5 million (522) 58.72 60.63 61.06 68.10
KRW 5~below 6 million (291) 54.12 57.22 56.87 65.64
Above KRW 6 million (674) 54.41 57.79 58.38 64.17
High (398) 55.59 59.17 58.29 65.39 Standard Mid (1476) 57.66 60.35 61.16 66.79 of living Low (1626) 56.52 59.12 59.38 66.05
140 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
[Table 34-2] Change in awareness arising from receipt of youth basic income – Per region of residence [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: Point]
Awareness on the Awareness on Attitude towards Awareness on the No. of role of nation/local future dream life changed definition of family cases government changed positively positively changed positively changed positively
All (City) (3500) 56.89 59.64 60.01 66.29
Suwon (363) 57.02 59.71 57.23 67.08
Seongnam (254) 53.44 55.71 55.41 64.96
Bucheon (261) 54.89 58.43 58.33 64.66
Anyang (185) 56.62 59.05 62.16 66.35
Ansan (239) 59.21 60.98 63.18 67.05
Yongin (270) 53.24 57.59 58.24 64.81
Pyeongtaek (131) 59.92 60.31 60.88 66.79
Gwangmyeong (96) 59.64 61.20 61.20 69.79
Siheung (144) 57.12 59.20 59.90 68.06
Gunpo (84) 56.55 59.52 58.04 66.67
Hwaseong (155) 53.87 59.03 58.55 64.84
Icheon (39) 51.92 51.92 55.13 59.62
Gimpo (85) 57.94 59.41 60.88 65.00
Gwangju (86) 56.10 60.17 63.08 63.66
Anseong (37) 58.11 59.46 61.49 67.57 Region of Hanam (43) 63.37 63.95 62.79 66.28 residence Uiwang (46) 54.89 59.24 60.33 67.39
Osan (53) 58.02 61.79 61.32 67.92
Gwacheon (20) 65.00 67.50 71.25 68.75
Yeoju (20) 63.75 65.00 68.75 72.50
Yangpyeong County (20) 63.75 61.25 66.25 66.25
Goyang (280) 57.50 61.96 60.89 68.48
Uijeongbu (130) 57.88 60.00 60.00 65.77
Namyangju (160) 59.38 61.09 63.13 67.34
Paju (96) 54.69 57.55 58.59 64.32
Guri (54) 60.65 65.28 62.04 67.59
Pocheon (35) 60.00 59.29 62.14 64.29
Yangju (48) 61.98 66.15 66.15 69.27
Dongducheon (26) 57.69 56.73 62.50 57.69
Gapyeong County (20) 52.50 53.75 55.00 62.50
Yeoncheon County (20) 62.50 66.25 66.25 70.00
141 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
1) Positive change in awareness regarding future dream
As for the question on whether there was a positive change in awareness regarding future dream, 40.9% responded by saying ‘Yes’ (Very so: 10.2% + Mostly so: 30.7%) which was higher than 18.6% who responded by saying ‘Not so’ (Not so much: 13.6% + Not at all: 4.9%).
[Figure 50] Positive change in awareness regarding future dream [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
Not so Yes
Not so 40.5 Yes 18.6% 40.9% Average 30.7 56.89 out of 100 points 13.6 10.2 Average 4.9 40.5%
Not at all Not so much Average Mostly so Very so
Analysis per characteristics
● As for the response, 'Yes' per respondent characteristics, it was relatively high in male, university student, who were currently soldiers and in middle class in terms of standard of living.
● As for the response 'Yes' per region of residence, Gwacheon City and Yeoju City, Yangpyeong County (n=20) were the highest with 55.0% respectively followed by Hanam City (53.5%) and Gwangmyeong City (49.0%).
142 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
[Table 35-1] Positive change in awareness regarding future dream – Per respondent characteristics
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
[Average No. of Not at Not so Mostly Very Average [No] [Average] [Quite so] converted cases all much so so to 100 pts]
All (3500) 4.9 13.6 40.5 30.7 10.2 18.6 40.5 40.9 56.89
Male (1221) 6.6 11.6 37.7 30.1 14.0 18.3 37.7 44.1 58.29 Gender Female (2279) 4.0 14.7 42.1 31.0 8.2 18.7 42.1 39.2 56.14
High graduate and below (500) 4.2 13.8 44.0 26.8 11.2 18.0 44.0 38.0 56.75 Educational University student (826) 6.5 10.9 39.0 33.3 10.3 17.4 39.0 43.6 57.48 background University graduate and above (2174) 4.5 14.6 40.3 30.6 9.9 19.1 40.3 40.5 56.70
Single (3414) 5.0 13.8 40.3 30.6 10.3 18.8 40.3 40.9 56.85 Marital Married (79) 5.1 5.1 51.9 29.1 8.9 10.1 51.9 38.0 57.91 status Others (7) 0.0 14.3 14.3 71.4 0.0 14.3 14.3 71.4 64.29
1-person household (324) 6.2 13.0 39.5 28.7 12.7 19.1 39.5 41.4 57.18
Married household (27) 7.4 3.7 48.1 25.9 14.8 11.1 48.1 40.7 59.26 Household Lives with children (37) 5.4 5.4 56.8 29.7 2.7 10.8 56.8 32.4 54.73 type Lives with parents (2846) 4.6 14.1 40.2 31.1 9.9 18.8 40.2 41.0 56.89
Others (266) 6.4 11.3 42.5 28.9 10.9 17.7 42.5 39.8 56.67
Student (with part-time job) (327) 4.6 10.1 35.8 35.8 13.8 14.7 35.8 49.5 61.01
Student (without part-time job) (438) 8.2 12.8 37.4 30.1 11.4 21.0 37.4 41.6 55.94
Current Unemployed (934) 3.9 15.2 41.1 30.6 9.2 19.1 41.1 39.8 56.53 identity status Soldier (32) 9.4 15.6 21.9 50.0 3.1 25.0 21.9 53.1 55.47
Employed (1607) 4.7 13.9 41.9 29.6 9.9 18.6 41.9 39.5 56.52
Others (162) 4.9 10.5 45.1 29.6 9.9 15.4 45.1 39.5 57.25
Below KRW 1 million (175) 7.4 15.4 37.7 28.0 11.4 22.9 37.7 39.4 55.14
KRW 1~below 2 million (546) 3.5 12.8 44.0 30.6 9.2 16.3 44.0 39.7 57.28
KRW 2~below 3 million (842) 4.2 12.9 40.3 32.1 10.6 17.1 40.3 42.6 57.99 Household KRW 3~below 4 million (450) 4.9 11.6 40.0 32.0 11.6 16.4 40.0 43.6 58.44 income KRW 4~below 5 million (522) 4.2 12.1 39.5 33.1 11.1 16.3 39.5 44.3 58.72
KRW 5~below 6 million (291) 6.2 15.1 43.0 27.5 8.2 21.3 43.0 35.7 54.12
Above KRW 6 million (674) 6.5 16.6 39.0 28.3 9.5 23.1 39.0 37.8 54.41
High (398) 8.5 13.6 37.7 27.4 12.8 22.1 37.7 40.2 55.59 Standard Mid (1476) 4.1 13.1 40.3 33.0 9.5 17.2 40.3 42.5 57.66 of living Low (1626) 4.8 14.1 41.5 29.4 10.2 18.9 41.5 39.6 56.52
143 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Table 35-2] Positive change in awareness regarding future dream – Per region of residence
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
[Average No. of Not at Not so Mostly Very Average [No] [Average] [Quite so] converted cases all much so so to 100 pts]
All (City) (3500) 4.9 13.6 40.5 30.7 10.2 18.6 40.5 40.9 56.89
Suwon (363) 5.8 12.7 39.4 32.0 10.2 18.5 39.4 42.1 57.02
Seongnam (254) 5.9 17.7 40.6 28.3 7.5 23.6 40.6 35.8 53.44
Bucheon (261) 5.4 14.2 44.4 27.6 8.4 19.5 44.4 36.0 54.89
Anyang (185) 7.6 11.4 40.0 29.2 11.9 18.9 40.0 41.1 56.62
Ansan (239) 4.2 13.4 36.0 34.3 12.1 17.6 36.0 46.4 59.21
Yongin (270) 6.7 18.1 39.6 26.7 8.9 24.8 39.6 35.6 53.24
Pyeongtaek (131) 3.8 8.4 45.8 28.2 13.7 12.2 45.8 42.0 59.92
Gwangmyeong (96) 4.2 15.6 31.3 35.4 13.5 19.8 31.3 49.0 59.64
Siheung (144) 4.9 13.9 39.6 31.3 10.4 18.8 39.6 41.7 57.12
Gunpo (84) 6.0 11.9 40.5 33.3 8.3 17.9 40.5 41.7 56.55
Hwaseong (155) 5.8 13.5 47.1 26.5 7.1 19.4 47.1 33.5 53.87
Icheon (39) 0.0 23.1 48.7 25.6 2.6 23.1 48.7 28.2 51.92
Gimpo (85) 7.1 8.2 38.8 37.6 8.2 15.3 38.8 45.9 57.94
Gwangju (86) 4.7 16.3 37.2 33.7 8.1 20.9 37.2 41.9 56.10
Anseong (37) 5.4 16.2 37.8 21.6 18.9 21.6 37.8 40.5 58.11 Region of Hanam (43) 2.3 9.3 34.9 39.5 14.0 11.6 34.9 53.5 63.37 residence Uiwang (46) 6.5 17.4 39.1 23.9 13.0 23.9 39.1 37.0 54.89
Osan (53) 5.7 7.5 45.3 32.1 9.4 13.2 45.3 41.5 58.02
Gwacheon (20) 0.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 25.0 20.0 25.0 55.0 65.00
Yeoju (20) 0.0 10.0 35.0 45.0 10.0 10.0 35.0 55.0 63.75
Yangpyeong County (20) 0.0 10.0 35.0 45.0 10.0 10.0 35.0 55.0 63.75
Goyang (280) 4.3 14.3 38.9 32.1 10.4 18.6 38.9 42.5 57.50
Uijeongbu (130) 3.1 15.4 39.2 31.5 10.8 18.5 39.2 42.3 57.88
Namyangju (160) 4.4 10.0 41.9 31.3 12.5 14.4 41.9 43.8 59.38
Paju (96) 1.0 17.7 50.0 24.0 7.3 18.8 50.0 31.3 54.69
Guri (54) 9.3 3.7 40.7 27.8 18.5 13.0 40.7 46.3 60.65
Pocheon (35) 0.0 14.3 37.1 42.9 5.7 14.3 37.1 48.6 60.00
Yangju (48) 0.0 6.3 47.9 37.5 8.3 6.3 47.9 45.8 61.98
Dongducheon (26) 3.8 7.7 53.8 23.1 11.5 11.5 53.8 34.6 57.69
Gapyeong County (20) 10.0 20.0 25.0 40.0 5.0 30.0 25.0 45.0 52.50
Yeoncheon County (20) 0.0 5.0 50.0 35.0 10.0 5.0 50.0 45.0 62.50
144 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
2) Positive change in awareness regarding attitude towards life
As for the question on whether there was a positive change in awareness regarding attitude towards life, 47.0% responded by saying ‘Yes’ (Very so: 12.4% + Mostly so: 34.6%) which was higher than 16.5 who responded by saying ‘Not so’ (Not so much: 12.2% + Not at all: 4.3%).
[Figure 51] Positive change in awareness regarding attitude towards life [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
Not so Yes
36.5 Not so 34.6 16.5% Average Yes 59.64 out 47.0% of 100 points 12.2 12.4 Average 38.5% 4.3
Not at all Not so much Average Mostly so Very so
Analysis per characteristics
● As for the response, 'Yes' per respondent characteristics, it was relatively high in male, university student, who were currently soldiers and in middle class in terms of standard of living.
● As for the response 'Yes' per region of residence, Yeoju City (n=20) was the highest with 60.0% followed by Guri City (57.4%) and Yangju City (56.3%).
145 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Table 36-1] Positive change in awareness regarding attitude towards life – Per respondent characteristics
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
[Average No. of Not at Not so Mostly Very Average [No] [Average] [Quite so] converted cases all much so so to 100 pts]
All (3500) 4.3 12.2 36.5 34.6 12.4 16.5 36.5 47.0 59.64
Male (1221) 6.0 11.5 33.7 33.3 15.6 17.4 33.7 48.8 60.24 Gender Female (2279) 3.4 12.6 38.0 35.3 10.7 16.0 38.0 46.0 59.32
High graduate and below (500) 4.2 10.8 40.4 31.2 13.4 15.0 40.4 44.6 59.70 Educational University student (826) 5.6 11.0 35.0 36.0 12.5 16.6 35.0 48.4 59.69 background University graduate and above (2174) 3.8 13.0 36.2 34.9 12.1 16.8 36.2 47.0 59.61
Single (3414) 4.3 12.3 36.4 34.5 12.4 16.6 36.4 47.0 59.63 Marital Married (79) 3.8 8.9 43.0 35.4 8.9 12.7 43.0 44.3 59.18 status Others (7) 0.0 0.0 28.6 57.1 14.3 0.0 28.6 71.4 71.43
1-person household (324) 5.6 10.8 35.2 33.0 15.4 16.4 35.2 48.5 60.49
Married household (27) 7.4 3.7 25.9 44.4 18.5 11.1 25.9 63.0 65.74 Household Lives with children (37) 2.7 13.5 56.8 24.3 2.7 16.2 56.8 27.0 52.70 type Lives with parents (2846) 4.1 12.6 36.1 35.0 12.2 16.8 36.1 47.2 59.64
Others (266) 4.5 9.8 41.7 33.1 10.9 14.3 41.7 44.0 59.02
Student (with part-time job) (327) 4.3 9.8 33.0 34.6 18.3 14.1 33.0 52.9 63.23
Student (without part-time job) (438) 7.5 12.3 34.5 34.0 11.6 19.9 34.5 45.7 57.48
Current Unemployed (934) 3.2 12.7 37.2 35.3 11.6 16.0 37.2 46.9 59.82 identity status Soldier (32) 9.4 12.5 21.9 53.1 3.1 21.9 21.9 56.3 57.03
Employed (1607) 4.0 12.5 37.5 33.8 12.2 16.5 37.5 46.0 59.43
Others (162) 3.7 10.5 38.9 36.4 10.5 14.2 38.9 46.9 59.88
Below KRW 1 million (175) 8.0 10.9 37.1 29.7 14.3 18.9 37.1 44.0 57.86
KRW 1~below 2 million (546) 3.3 11.5 40.7 33.9 10.6 14.8 40.7 44.5 59.25
KRW 2~below 3 million (842) 4.3 11.3 35.6 34.4 14.4 15.6 35.6 48.8 60.84 Household KRW 3~below 4 million (450) 3.8 10.7 34.4 36.9 14.2 14.4 34.4 51.1 61.78 income KRW 4~below 5 million (522) 3.3 13.0 34.1 37.2 12.5 16.3 34.1 49.6 60.63
KRW 5~below 6 million (291) 4.8 14.8 35.7 36.1 8.6 19.6 35.7 44.7 57.22
Above KRW 6 million (674) 5.0 13.5 37.8 32.5 11.1 18.5 37.8 43.6 57.79
High (398) 6.0 13.1 33.7 32.7 14.6 19.1 33.7 47.2 59.17 Standard Mid (1476) 3.7 11.0 36.5 37.7 11.0 14.7 36.5 48.8 60.35 of living Low (1626) 4.4 13.1 37.3 32.2 13.0 17.5 37.3 45.3 59.12
146 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
[Table 36-2] Positive change in awareness regarding attitude towards life – Per region of residence
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
[Average No. of Not at Not so Mostly Very Average [No] [Average] [Quite so] converted cases all much so so to 100 pts]
All (City) (3500) 4.3 12.2 36.5 34.6 12.4 16.5 36.5 47.0 59.64
Suwon (363) 4.4 13.8 33.1 36.1 12.7 18.2 33.1 48.8 59.71
Seongnam (254) 5.5 15.7 38.6 30.7 9.4 21.3 38.6 40.2 55.71
Bucheon (261) 5.0 11.5 37.9 36.0 9.6 16.5 37.9 45.6 58.43
Anyang (185) 7.6 9.7 36.2 31.9 14.6 17.3 36.2 46.5 59.05
Ansan (239) 3.3 12.6 36.8 31.4 15.9 15.9 36.8 47.3 60.98
Yongin (270) 4.8 14.8 36.7 32.6 11.1 19.6 36.7 43.7 57.59
Pyeongtaek (131) 3.8 11.5 38.2 32.8 13.7 15.3 38.2 46.6 60.31
Gwangmyeong (96) 3.1 14.6 31.3 36.5 14.6 17.7 31.3 51.0 61.20
Siheung (144) 4.9 9.7 42.4 29.9 13.2 14.6 42.4 43.1 59.20
Gunpo (84) 6.0 10.7 35.7 34.5 13.1 16.7 35.7 47.6 59.52
Hwaseong (155) 4.5 11.0 38.1 36.8 9.7 15.5 38.1 46.5 59.03
Icheon (39) 2.6 20.5 51.3 17.9 7.7 23.1 51.3 25.6 51.92
Gimpo (85) 4.7 10.6 35.3 41.2 8.2 15.3 35.3 49.4 59.41
Gwangju (86) 1.2 15.1 36.0 37.2 10.5 16.3 36.0 47.7 60.17
Anseong (37) 5.4 10.8 37.8 32.4 13.5 16.2 37.8 45.9 59.46 Region of Hanam (43) 2.3 7.0 39.5 34.9 16.3 9.3 39.5 51.2 63.95 residence Uiwang (46) 8.7 13.0 26.1 37.0 15.2 21.7 26.1 52.2 59.24
Osan (53) 7.5 3.8 34.0 43.4 11.3 11.3 34.0 54.7 61.79
Gwacheon (20) 0.0 15.0 30.0 25.0 30.0 15.0 30.0 55.0 67.50
Yeoju (20) 0.0 10.0 30.0 50.0 10.0 10.0 30.0 60.0 65.00
Yangpyeong County (20) 0.0 10.0 45.0 35.0 10.0 10.0 45.0 45.0 61.25
Goyang (280) 3.2 11.4 33.6 37.9 13.9 14.6 33.6 51.8 61.96
Uijeongbu (130) 2.3 15.4 35.4 33.8 13.1 17.7 35.4 46.9 60.00
Namyangju (160) 5.6 8.8 35.0 36.9 13.8 14.4 35.0 50.6 61.09
Paju (96) 1.0 15.6 42.7 33.3 7.3 16.7 42.7 40.6 57.55
Guri (54) 7.4 1.9 33.3 37.0 20.4 9.3 33.3 57.4 65.28
Pocheon (35) 0.0 14.3 40.0 40.0 5.7 14.3 40.0 45.7 59.29
Yangju (48) 0.0 4.2 39.6 43.8 12.5 4.2 39.6 56.3 66.15
Dongducheon (26) 3.8 11.5 50.0 23.1 11.5 15.4 50.0 34.6 56.73
Gapyeong County (20) 5.0 25.0 30.0 30.0 10.0 30.0 30.0 40.0 53.75
Yeoncheon County (20) 0.0 5.0 40.0 40.0 15.0 5.0 40.0 55.0 66.25
147 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
3) Positive change in awareness regarding definition of family
As for the question on whether there was a positive change in awareness regarding definition of family, 46.2% responded by saying ‘Yes’ (Very so: 13.9% + Mostly so: 32.4%) which was higher than 15.7 who responded by saying ‘Not so’ (Not so much: 11.4% + Not at all: 4.3%).
[Figure 52] Positive change in awareness regarding definition of family [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
Not so Yes
38.1 Not so 32.4 Yes 15.7% Average 46.2% 60.01 out of 100 points 11.4 13.9 Average 4.3 38.1%
Not at all Not so much Average Mostly so Very so
Analysis per characteristics
● As for the response, 'Yes' per respondent characteristics, it was relatively high male, university student who were currently students (with part-time job) and in middle class in terms of standard of living.
● As for the response 'Yes' per region of residence, Yeoju City (n=20) was the highest with 70.0% followed by Gwacheon City (65.0%, n=20) and Pocheon City (57.1%).
148 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
[Table 37-1] Positive change in awareness regarding definition of family – Per respondent characteristics
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
[Average No. of Not at Not so Mostly Very Average [No] [Average] [Quite so] converted cases all much so so to 100 pts]
All (3500) 4.3 11.4 38.1 32.4 13.9 15.7 38.1 46.2 60.01
Male (1221) 5.9 8.2 35.4 33.7 16.8 14.1 35.4 50.5 61.83 Gender Female (2279) 3.5 13.1 39.5 31.6 12.3 16.6 39.5 43.9 59.03
High graduate and below (500) 3.6 9.6 40.4 31.2 15.2 13.2 40.4 46.4 61.20 Educational University student (826) 6.7 10.2 35.6 33.9 13.7 16.8 35.6 47.6 59.44 background University graduate and above (2174) 3.6 12.2 38.5 32.1 13.6 15.9 38.5 45.7 59.95
Single (3414) 4.4 11.5 37.9 32.3 13.9 15.9 37.9 46.2 59.97 Marital Married (79) 3.8 3.8 45.6 35.4 11.4 7.6 45.6 46.8 61.71 status Others (7) 0.0 28.6 14.3 42.9 14.3 28.6 14.3 57.1 60.71
1-person household (324) 6.5 11.1 38.6 28.1 15.7 17.6 38.6 43.8 58.87
Married household (27) 7.4 7.4 37.0 29.6 18.5 14.8 37.0 48.1 61.11 Household Lives with children (37) 2.7 2.7 54.1 35.1 5.4 5.4 54.1 40.5 59.46 type Lives with parents (2846) 4.0 11.7 37.7 32.8 13.7 15.8 37.7 46.5 60.10
Others (266) 4.9 9.4 39.1 32.7 13.9 14.3 39.1 46.6 60.34
Student (with part-time job) (327) 4.9 6.7 35.8 33.9 18.7 11.6 35.8 52.6 63.69
Student (without part-time job) (438) 7.3 12.3 36.1 30.4 13.9 19.6 36.1 44.3 57.82
Current Unemployed (934) 4.0 13.5 39.3 31.3 12.0 17.5 39.3 43.3 58.46 identity status Soldier (32) 12.5 3.1 34.4 37.5 12.5 15.6 34.4 50.0 58.59
Employed (1607) 3.7 11.3 37.4 33.4 14.3 14.9 37.4 47.7 60.83
Others (162) 2.5 8.6 48.1 29.6 11.1 11.1 48.1 40.7 59.57
Below KRW 1 million (175) 8.0 10.3 38.3 29.1 14.3 18.3 38.3 43.4 57.86
KRW 1~below 2 million (546) 3.1 10.3 41.4 31.9 13.4 13.4 41.4 45.2 60.53
KRW 2~below 3 million (842) 3.4 10.5 38.1 33.5 14.5 13.9 38.1 48.0 61.28 Household KRW 3~below 4 million (450) 4.2 9.1 39.8 32.0 14.9 13.3 39.8 46.9 61.06 income KRW 4~below 5 million (522) 4.0 12.3 35.2 32.4 16.1 16.3 35.2 48.5 61.06
KRW 5~below 6 million (291) 5.8 15.1 37.1 29.6 12.4 21.0 37.1 41.9 56.87
Above KRW 6 million (674) 5.2 12.9 36.6 33.7 11.6 18.1 36.6 45.3 58.38
High (398) 6.8 13.6 35.7 27.6 16.3 20.4 35.7 44.0 58.29 Standard Mid (1476) 3.8 10.2 36.0 37.6 12.4 14.0 36.0 50.0 61.16 of living Low (1626) 4.2 11.9 40.5 28.8 14.6 16.2 40.5 43.4 59.38
149 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Table 37-2] Positive change in awareness regarding definition of family – Per region of residence
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
[Average No. of Not at Not so Mostly Very Average [No] [Average] [Quite so] converted cases all much so so to 100 pts]
All (City) (3500) 4.3 11.4 38.1 32.4 13.9 15.7 38.1 46.2 60.01
Suwon (363) 5.5 15.4 37.7 27.3 14.0 20.9 37.7 41.3 57.23
Seongnam (254) 5.5 16.5 39.4 28.0 10.6 22.0 39.4 38.6 55.41
Bucheon (261) 4.6 10.7 41.8 32.6 10.3 15.3 41.8 42.9 58.33
Anyang (185) 6.5 6.5 36.2 33.5 17.3 13.0 36.2 50.8 62.16
Ansan (239) 3.8 9.6 35.6 32.2 18.8 13.4 35.6 51.0 63.18
Yongin (270) 5.2 11.5 41.9 28.1 13.3 16.7 41.9 41.5 58.24
Pyeongtaek (131) 3.8 10.7 37.4 34.4 13.7 14.5 37.4 48.1 60.88
Gwangmyeong (96) 3.1 13.5 33.3 35.4 14.6 16.7 33.3 50.0 61.20
Siheung (144) 5.6 11.1 37.5 29.9 16.0 16.7 37.5 45.8 59.90
Gunpo (84) 8.3 9.5 33.3 39.3 9.5 17.9 33.3 48.8 58.04
Hwaseong (155) 5.8 11.0 36.8 36.1 10.3 16.8 36.8 46.5 58.55
Icheon (39) 0.0 17.9 48.7 28.2 5.1 17.9 48.7 33.3 55.13
Gimpo (85) 4.7 8.2 41.2 30.6 15.3 12.9 41.2 45.9 60.88
Gwangju (86) 0.0 12.8 36.0 37.2 14.0 12.8 36.0 51.2 63.08
Anseong (37) 5.4 8.1 40.5 27.0 18.9 13.5 40.5 45.9 61.49 Region of Hanam (43) 2.3 7.0 39.5 39.5 11.6 9.3 39.5 51.2 62.79 residence Uiwang (46) 4.3 15.2 32.6 30.4 17.4 19.6 32.6 47.8 60.33
Osan (53) 5.7 5.7 41.5 32.1 15.1 11.3 41.5 47.2 61.32
Gwacheon (20) 0.0 10.0 25.0 35.0 30.0 10.0 25.0 65.0 71.25
Yeoju (20) 0.0 10.0 20.0 55.0 15.0 10.0 20.0 70.0 68.75
Yangpyeong County (20) 0.0 5.0 40.0 40.0 15.0 5.0 40.0 55.0 66.25
Goyang (280) 3.6 11.1 36.8 35.4 13.2 14.6 36.8 48.6 60.89
Uijeongbu (130) 1.5 14.6 40.8 28.5 14.6 16.2 40.8 43.1 60.00
Namyangju (160) 3.8 8.8 35.6 35.0 16.9 12.5 35.6 51.9 63.13
Paju (96) 2.1 13.5 40.6 35.4 8.3 15.6 40.6 43.8 58.59
Guri (54) 7.4 5.6 37.0 31.5 18.5 13.0 37.0 50.0 62.04
Pocheon (35) 0.0 17.1 25.7 48.6 8.6 17.1 25.7 57.1 62.14
Yangju (48) 0.0 2.1 50.0 29.2 18.8 2.1 50.0 47.9 66.15
Dongducheon (26) 3.8 3.8 42.3 38.5 11.5 7.7 42.3 50.0 62.50
Gapyeong County (20) 5.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 5.0 25.0 30.0 45.0 55.00
Yeoncheon County (20) 5.0 0.0 40.0 35.0 20.0 5.0 40.0 55.0 66.25
150 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
4) Positive change in awareness regarding the role of nation/local government
As for the question on whether there was a positive change in awareness regarding the role of national/local government, 61.4% responded by saying ‘Yes’ (Very so: 18.6% + Mostly so: 42.8%) which was higher than 10.6% who responded by saying ‘Not so’ (Not so much: 6.4% + Not at all: 4.2%).
[Figure 53] Positive change in awareness regarding the role of nation/local government
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
Not so Yes
Not so 42.8 10.6% Average Yes 66.29 out 61.4% of 100 28.0 points Average 18.6 28.0%
4.2 6.4
Not at all Not so much Average Mostly so Very so
Analysis per characteristics
● As for the response, 'Yes' per respondent characteristics, it was relatively high in male, university students, who were currently students (with part time job) and in middle class in terms of standard of living.
● As for the response 'Yes' per region of residence, Yeoju City (n=20) was the highest with 70.0% followed by Hanam City (69.8%) and Uiwang City (69.6%).
151 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Table 38-1] Positive change in awareness regarding the role of nation/local government – Per respondent characteristics [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
[Average No. of Not at Not so Mostly Very Average [No] [Average] [Quite so] converted cases all much so so to 100 pts]
All (3500) 4.2 6.4 28.0 42.8 18.6 10.6 28.0 61.4 66.29
Male (1221) 7.0 5.1 26.3 42.8 18.9 12.0 26.3 61.7 65.40 Gender Female (2279) 2.7 7.2 28.9 42.9 18.4 9.9 28.9 61.3 66.76
High graduate and below (500) 2.8 6.8 36.8 37.2 16.4 9.6 36.8 53.6 64.40 Educational University student (826) 6.4 4.7 23.1 46.5 19.2 11.1 23.1 65.7 66.86 background University graduate and above (2174) 3.7 7.0 27.8 42.7 18.8 10.7 27.8 61.5 66.50
Single (3414) 4.3 6.4 27.9 42.9 18.5 10.7 27.9 61.4 66.25 Marital Married (79) 1.3 8.9 31.6 40.5 17.7 10.1 31.6 58.2 66.14 status Others (7) 0.0 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 0.0 0.0 100.0 85.71
1-person household (324) 4.0 5.9 24.7 41.7 23.8 9.9 24.7 65.4 68.83
Married household (27) 0.0 14.8 22.2 40.7 22.2 14.8 22.2 63.0 67.59 Household Lives with children (37) 2.7 8.1 37.8 37.8 13.5 10.8 37.8 51.4 62.84 type Lives with parents (2846) 4.4 6.4 28.2 42.8 18.2 10.8 28.2 61.0 65.98
Others (266) 3.0 6.0 28.6 45.5 16.9 9.0 28.6 62.4 66.82
Student (with part-time job) (327) 5.2 3.4 21.4 46.8 23.2 8.6 21.4 70.0 69.88
Student (without part-time job) (438) 6.6 5.9 25.6 43.8 18.0 12.6 25.6 61.9 65.18
Current Unemployed (934) 3.4 7.0 27.7 42.7 19.2 10.4 27.7 61.9 66.81 identity status Soldier (32) 9.4 3.1 21.9 53.1 12.5 12.5 21.9 65.6 64.06
Employed (1607) 3.8 6.6 29.1 42.2 18.3 10.4 29.1 60.5 66.15
Others (162) 3.1 9.9 38.9 37.0 11.1 13.0 38.9 48.1 60.80
Below KRW 1 million (175) 7.4 9.1 29.7 37.1 16.6 16.6 29.7 53.7 61.57
KRW 1~below 2 million (546) 2.9 7.1 33.0 41.0 15.9 10.1 33.0 57.0 64.97
KRW 2~below 3 million (842) 3.1 5.8 27.9 43.3 19.8 8.9 27.9 63.2 67.76 Household KRW 3~below 4 million (450) 4.2 3.6 26.0 46.7 19.6 7.8 26.0 66.2 68.44 income KRW 4~below 5 million (522) 3.4 6.9 26.2 40.6 22.8 10.3 26.2 63.4 68.10
KRW 5~below 6 million (291) 5.2 5.8 26.1 47.1 15.8 11.0 26.1 62.9 65.64
Above KRW 6 million (674) 5.9 7.7 27.0 42.4 16.9 13.6 27.0 59.3 64.17
High (398) 7.3 7.0 24.1 39.9 21.6 14.3 24.1 61.6 65.39 Standard Mid (1476) 3.7 5.5 28.0 45.5 17.3 9.2 28.0 62.8 66.79 of living Low (1626) 3.9 7.1 28.9 41.1 19.0 11.0 28.9 60.1 66.05
152 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
[Table 38-2] Positive change in awareness regarding the role of nation/local government – Per region of residence [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
[Average No. of Not at Not so Mostly Very Average [No] [Average] [Quite so] converted cases all much so so to 100 pts]
All (City) (3500) 4.2 6.4 28.0 42.8 18.6 10.6 28.0 61.4 66.29
Suwon (363) 4.4 5.8 29.2 38.3 22.3 10.2 29.2 60.6 67.08
Seongnam (254) 5.9 5.1 31.9 37.4 19.7 11.0 31.9 57.1 64.96
Bucheon (261) 3.8 8.0 27.2 47.5 13.4 11.9 27.2 60.9 64.66
Anyang (185) 6.5 4.9 25.4 43.2 20.0 11.4 25.4 63.2 66.35
Ansan (239) 3.8 5.9 28.5 42.3 19.7 9.6 28.5 61.9 67.05
Yongin (270) 5.9 6.3 27.0 44.1 16.7 12.2 27.0 60.7 64.81
Pyeongtaek (131) 3.8 7.6 26.0 42.7 19.8 11.5 26.0 62.6 66.79
Gwangmyeong (96) 2.1 10.4 18.8 43.8 25.0 12.5 18.8 68.8 69.79
Siheung (144) 4.2 2.1 27.8 49.3 16.7 6.3 27.8 66.0 68.06
Gunpo (84) 3.6 6.0 29.8 41.7 19.0 9.5 29.8 60.7 66.67
Hwaseong (155) 5.2 6.5 29.0 42.6 16.8 11.6 29.0 59.4 64.84
Icheon (39) 5.1 7.7 43.6 30.8 12.8 12.8 43.6 43.6 59.62
Gimpo (85) 4.7 9.4 23.5 45.9 16.5 14.1 23.5 62.4 65.00
Gwangju (86) 3.5 10.5 27.9 44.2 14.0 14.0 27.9 58.1 63.66
Anseong (37) 2.7 8.1 32.4 29.7 27.0 10.8 32.4 56.8 67.57 Region of Hanam (43) 7.0 4.7 18.6 55.8 14.0 11.6 18.6 69.8 66.28 residence Uiwang (46) 13.0 2.2 15.2 41.3 28.3 15.2 15.2 69.6 67.39
Osan (53) 3.8 0.0 30.2 52.8 13.2 3.8 30.2 66.0 67.92
Gwacheon (20) 0.0 10.0 25.0 45.0 20.0 10.0 25.0 65.0 68.75
Yeoju (20) 0.0 10.0 20.0 40.0 30.0 10.0 20.0 70.0 72.50
Yangpyeong County (20) 0.0 10.0 30.0 45.0 15.0 10.0 30.0 60.0 66.25
Goyang (280) 2.5 7.9 24.3 43.9 21.4 10.4 24.3 65.4 68.48
Uijeongbu (130) 3.8 7.7 29.2 40.0 19.2 11.5 29.2 59.2 65.77
Namyangju (160) 3.1 5.6 27.5 46.3 17.5 8.8 27.5 63.8 67.34
Paju (96) 1.0 6.3 39.6 40.6 12.5 7.3 39.6 53.1 64.32
Guri (54) 7.4 1.9 25.9 42.6 22.2 9.3 25.9 64.8 67.59
Pocheon (35) 0.0 8.6 40.0 37.1 14.3 8.6 40.0 51.4 64.29
Yangju (48) 2.1 2.1 31.3 45.8 18.8 4.2 31.3 64.6 69.27
Dongducheon (26) 0.0 15.4 46.2 30.8 7.7 15.4 46.2 38.5 57.69
Gapyeong County (20) 5.0 15.0 15.0 55.0 10.0 20.0 15.0 65.0 62.50
Yeoncheon County (20) 0.0 5.0 30.0 45.0 20.0 5.0 30.0 65.0 70.00
153 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
3. Analysis of Survey Result Satisfaction related to local part Ⅱ currency of Gyeonggi Province
Types of local currency selected upon 1 receipt of youth basic income
What is the type of the local currency that you have selected (or used) Q upon receipt of youth basic income?
As for the question on the local currency selected upon receiving youth basic income, ‘Card-type’ was the highest with 89.3% followed by ‘Mobile-type’ (10.3%) and ‘Note (paper)-type’ (0.5%).
[Figure 54] Types of local currency selected upon receipt of youth basic income
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
89.3
10.3 0.5
Note (paper)-type Card-type Mobile-type
Analysis per characteristics
● Card-type of local currency was selected the most in all respondent's characteristics.
154 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
[Table 39-1] Types of local currency selected upon receipt of youth basic income – Per respondent's characteristics [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
No. of cases Note (paper)-type Card-type Mobile-type
All (3500) 0.5 89.3 10.3
Male (1221) 0.5 88.4 11.1 Gender Female (2279) 0.4 89.7 9.8
High graduate and below (500) 0.2 89.0 10.8 Educational University student (826) 0.1 91.0 8.8 background University graduate and above (2174) 0.6 88.6 10.7
Single (3414) 0.5 89.2 10.3 Marital Married (79) 0.0 91.1 8.9 status Others (7) 0.0 85.7 14.3
1-person household (324) 0.3 85.2 14.5
Married household (27) 0.0 85.2 14.8 Household Lives with children (37) 0.0 91.9 8.1 type Lives with parents (2846) 0.4 89.9 9.7
Others (266) 1.1 87.6 11.3
Student (with part-time job) (327) 0.9 88.1 11.0
Student (without part-time job) (438) 0.2 88.4 11.4
Current Unemployed (934) 0.3 91.6 8.0 identity status Soldier (32) 0.0 81.3 18.8
Employed (1607) 0.6 88.2 11.2
Others (162) 0.0 92.0 8.0
Below KRW 1 million (175) 0.6 90.3 9.1
KRW 1~below 2 million (546) 0.7 86.8 12.5
KRW 2~below 3 million (842) 0.5 88.8 10.7 Household KRW 3~below 4 million (450) 0.0 93.3 6.7 income KRW 4~below 5 million (522) 0.2 91.4 8.4
KRW 5~below 6 million (291) 1.0 88.0 11.0
Above KRW 6 million (674) 0.4 87.7 11.9
High (398) 1.0 87.9 11.1 Standard Mid (1476) 0.3 89.8 10.0 of living Low (1626) 0.5 89.1 10.4
155 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Table 39-2] Types of local currency selected upon receipt of youth basic income – Per region of residence [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
No. of cases Note (paper)-type Card-type Mobile-type
All (City) (3500) 0.5 89.3 10.3
Suwon (363) 0.0 95.9 4.1
Seongnam (254) 2.8 78.7 18.5
Bucheon (261) 0.0 98.1 1.9
Anyang (185) 0.5 96.2 3.2
Ansan (239) 0.0 96.7 3.3
Yongin (270) 0.0 96.3 3.7
Pyeongtaek (131) 0.0 96.9 3.1
Gwangmyeong (96) 1.0 94.8 4.2
Siheung (144) 1.4 4.9 93.8
Gunpo (84) 0.0 97.6 2.4
Hwaseong (155) 0.6 96.1 3.2
Icheon (39) 0.0 100.0 0.0
Gimpo (85) 0.0 22.4 77.6
Gwangju (86) 1.2 96.5 2.3
Anseong (37) 0.0 100.0 0.0 Region of Hanam (43) 0.0 90.7 9.3 residence Uiwang (46) 0.0 93.5 6.5
Osan (53) 1.9 96.2 1.9
Gwacheon (20) 0.0 95.0 5.0
Yeoju (20) 0.0 95.0 5.0
Yangpyeong County (20) 5.0 90.0 5.0
Goyang (280) 0.4 94.3 5.4
Uijeongbu (130) 0.0 97.7 2.3
Namyangju (160) 0.0 97.5 2.5
Paju (96) 0.0 94.8 5.2
Guri (54) 0.0 96.3 3.7
Pocheon (35) 0.0 91.4 8.6
Yangju (48) 0.0 91.7 8.3
Dongducheon (26) 0.0 88.5 11.5
Gapyeong County (20) 0.0 100.0 0.0
Yeoncheon County (20) 0.0 95.0 5.0
156 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
1-1 Difficulties when using note (paper)-type of local currency
Q What was the biggest inconvenience in using note (paper)-type of local currency?
As for difficulties in respondents who have applied for note (paper)-type of local currency (n=16) during use, 'Restriction in business field and type of franchise store’ was the highest with 37.5% followed by 'Storage and possession' and ‘Finding the stores where it can be used’ (25.0% respectively).
[Figure 55] Difficulties when using note (paper)-type of local currency
[Base: Respondents who have selected note (paper)-type of local currency, n=16, Unit: %]
37.5
25.0 25.0
6.3 6.3
Restriction in business Storage and Finding the Registration of Unfriendly merchants field and type of possession stores where cash receipt arising from transaction franchise store it can be used of local currency
Analysis per characteristics
● As the number of cases is below 30 people, interpretation is excluded when analyzing the respondent's characteristics.
157 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Table 40-1] Difficulties when using note (paper)-type of local currency – Per respondent's characteristics
[Base: Respondents who have selected note (paper)-type of local currency, n=16, Unit: %]
Unfriendly Restriction in Finding the Registration merchants No. of business field Storage and stores where of arising from cases and type of possession it can be used cash receipt transaction franchise store of local currency
All (16) 37.5 25.0 25.0 6.3 6.3
Male (6) 33.3 33.3 33.3 0.0 0.0 Gender Female (10) 40.0 20.0 20.0 10.0 10.0
High graduate and below (1) 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0
Educational University student (1) 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 background
University graduate and above (14) 42.9 21.4 21.4 7.1 7.1
Marital Single (16) 37.5 25.0 25.0 6.3 6.3 status
1-person household (1) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0
Household Lives with parents (12) 50.0 25.0 16.7 8.3 0.0 type
Others (3) 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 0.0
Student (with part-time job) (3) 33.3 66.7 0.0 0.0 0.0
Current Student (without part-time job) (1) 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 identity status Unemployed (3) 66.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 33.3
Employed (9) 22.2 22.2 44.4 11.1 0.0
Below KRW 1 million (1) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0
KRW 1~below 2 million (4) 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 0.0
KRW 2~below 3 million (4) 50.0 25.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 Household income KRW 3~below 4 million (1) 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
KRW 4~below 5 million (3) 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Above KRW 6 million (3) 0.0 66.7 33.3 0.0 0.0
High (4) 25.0 50.0 25.0 0.0 0.0
Standard Mid (4) 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 of living
Low (8) 37.5 25.0 12.5 12.5 12.5
158 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
[Table 40-2] Difficulties when using note (paper)-type of local currency – Per region of residence
[Base: Respondents who have selected note (paper)-type of local currency, n=16, Unit: %]
Unfriendly Restriction in Finding the Registration merchants No. of business field Storage and stores where of arising from cases and type of possession it cash receipt transaction franchise store can be used of local currency
All (City) (16) 37.5 25.0 25.0 6.3 6.3
Seongnam (7) 42.9 14.3 14.3 14.3 14.3
Anyang (1) 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0
Gwangmyeong (1) 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0
Siheung (2) 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Region of Hwaseong (1) 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 residence
Gwangju (1) 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Osan (1) 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Yangpyeong County (1) 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0
Goyang (1) 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
159 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
1-2 Difficulties in using card-type of local currency
Q What was the biggest inconvenience in using card-type of local currency?
As for difficulties in respondents who have applied for card-type of local currency (n=3,124) during use, ‘Finding the stores where it can be used’ was the highest with 55.0% followed by 'Restriction in business field and type of franchise store’ (27.6%) and 'Storage and possession' (8.1%).
[Figure 56] Difficulties in using card-type of local currency
[Base: Respondents who have selected card-type of local currency, n=3124, Unit: %]
55.0
27.6
8.1 5.2 3.1 1.0
Finding the Restriction Storage and Unfriendly merchants Inconvenient Others stores where it in business possession arising from payment can be used field and type of transaction process franchise store of local currency
Analysis per characteristics
● As for the response, 'Finding the stores where it can be used' per respondent's characteristics, it was relatively high in female, who were currently soldiers and with lower standard of living.
● As for the response 'Finding the stores where it can be used' per region of residence, Icheon City was the highest with 71.8% followed by Namyangju City (64.1%) and Gwangju City (63.9%).
160 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
[Table 41-1] Difficulties in using card-type of local currency – Per respondent's characteristics
[Base: Respondents who have selected card-type of local currency, n=3124, Unit: %]
Finding the Restriction Unfriendly stores in business Inconvenient No. of Storage and merchants arising where it field and type payment Others cases possession fromtransaction can be of franchise process of local currency used store
All (3124) 55.0 27.6 8.1 3.1 1.0 5.2
Male (1079) 52.5 30.5 6.7 2.8 1.6 5.9 Gender Female (2045) 56.3 26.1 8.9 3.2 0.7 4.9
High graduate and below (445) 56.6 25.4 6.3 4.9 1.3 5.4 Educational University student (752) 50.3 34.6 6.4 2.7 1.2 4.9 background University graduate and above (1927) 56.5 25.4 9.2 2.8 0.8 5.3
Single (3046) 54.9 27.9 8.0 3.0 1.0 5.3 Marital Married (72) 56.9 16.7 12.5 6.9 1.4 5.6 status Others (6) 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1-person household (276) 51.4 29.3 8.7 4.3 1.4 4.7
Married household (23) 65.2 17.4 13.0 0.0 4.3 0.0 Household Lives with children (34) 52.9 14.7 11.8 8.8 0.0 11.8 type Lives with parents (2558) 55.7 27.3 8.2 2.8 0.9 5.1
Others (233) 50.2 31.8 5.6 3.9 1.7 6.9
Student (with part-time job) (288) 51.7 31.3 7.6 2.8 0.7 5.9
Student (without part-time job) (387) 50.6 33.6 6.7 1.6 1.8 5.7
Current Unemployed (856) 58.1 26.2 6.8 3.0 1.2 4.8 identity status Soldier (26) 65.4 26.9 0.0 0.0 3.8 3.8
Employed (1418) 55.8 25.6 9.2 3.4 0.7 5.3
Others (149) 45.6 32.2 10.7 5.4 0.7 5.4
Below KRW 1 million (158) 50.6 31.0 7.6 3.8 1.3 5.7
KRW 1~below 2 million (474) 54.2 27.0 7.4 3.8 1.1 6.5
KRW 2~below 3 million (748) 55.9 27.7 7.6 2.9 1.2 4.7 Household KRW 3~below 4 million (420) 55.5 29.5 6.4 3.1 1.4 4.0 income KRW 4~below 5 million (477) 56.0 28.3 7.8 1.3 1.0 5.7
KRW 5~below 6 million (256) 53.9 26.6 7.8 6.3 0.4 5.1
Above KRW 6 million (591) 55.0 25.5 11.0 2.5 0.5 5.4
High (350) 53.4 24.9 14.3 1.7 1.1 4.6 Standard Mid (1325) 54.3 28.3 7.8 2.7 1.0 6.0 of living Low (1449) 56.0 27.6 6.9 3.7 1.0 4.8
161 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Table 41-2] Difficulties in using card-type of local currency – Per region of residence
[Base: Respondents who have selected card-type of local currency, n=3124, Unit: %]
Finding the Restriction Unfriendly Inconvenient No. of stores in business Storage and merchants arising payment Others cases where it field and type of possession from transaction process can be used franchise store of local currency
All (City) (3124) 55.0 27.6 8.1 3.1 1.0 5.2
Suwon (348) 57.5 25.3 7.8 2.9 1.7 4.9
Seongnam (200) 53.5 32.5 3.0 4.5 1.5 5.0
Bucheon (256) 50.4 35.2 5.5 2.3 0.8 5.9
Anyang (178) 55.6 25.3 9.0 5.1 0.6 4.5
Ansan (231) 51.9 26.4 9.5 3.0 0.9 8.2
Yongin (260) 58.5 25.8 7.7 2.7 0.8 4.6
Pyeongtaek (127) 61.4 24.4 5.5 2.4 1.6 4.7
Gwangmyeong (91) 54.9 24.2 12.1 4.4 0.0 4.4
Siheung (7) 42.9 28.6 14.3 0.0 14.3 0.0
Gunpo (82) 43.9 30.5 15.9 3.7 1.2 4.9
Hwaseong (149) 57.0 30.2 10.1 1.3 0.0 1.3
Icheon (39) 71.8 15.4 2.6 7.7 0.0 2.6
Gimpo (19) 36.8 15.8 15.8 0.0 0.0 31.6
Gwangju (83) 63.9 22.9 6.0 2.4 0.0 4.8
Anseong (37) 51.4 29.7 8.1 2.7 0.0 8.1 Region of Hanam (39) 43.6 17.9 25.6 0.0 0.0 12.8 residence Uiwang (43) 60.5 25.6 4.7 2.3 0.0 7.0
Osan (51) 52.9 23.5 7.8 7.8 2.0 5.9
Gwacheon (19) 26.3 47.4 26.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
Yeoju (19) 63.2 26.3 5.3 0.0 0.0 5.3
Yangpyeong County (18) 44.4 33.3 16.7 0.0 0.0 5.6
Goyang (264) 54.9 28.0 8.7 2.3 1.9 4.2
Uijeongbu (127) 58.3 29.1 5.5 2.4 0.0 4.7
Namyangju (156) 64.1 25.0 5.8 3.2 0.6 1.3
Paju (91) 52.7 25.3 13.2 1.1 1.1 6.6
Guri (52) 46.2 28.8 15.4 1.9 3.8 3.8
Pocheon (32) 56.3 25.0 6.3 3.1 0.0 9.4
Yangju (44) 52.3 25.0 6.8 4.5 2.3 9.1
Dongducheon (23) 43.5 43.5 0.0 13.0 0.0 0.0
Gapyeong County (20) 45.0 40.0 0.0 5.0 0.0 10.0
Yeoncheon County (19) 31.6 36.8 0.0 10.5 0.0 21.1
162 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
Difficulties in using mobile-type (app. installation) 1-3 of local currency
Q What was the biggest inconvenience in using mobile-type (app. installation) of local currency?
As for difficulties in respondents who have applied for mobile-type (app. installation) of local currency (n=360) during use, ‘Finding the stores where it can be used’ was the highest with 41.4% followed by 'Restriction in business field and type of franchise store’ (24.7%) and 'Inconvenient payment process' (16.1%).
[Figure 57] Difficulties in using mobile-type (app. installation) of local currency
[Base: Respondents who have selected mobile (app. installation) type of local currency, n=360, Unit: %]
41.4
24.7
16.1
5.6 5.6 6.7
Finding the Restriction Inconvenient Inconvenient Unfriendly Others stores where it in business payment process app download merchants arising can be used field and type of (payment procedure and installation from transaction franchise store and time taken) of local currency
Analysis per characteristics
● As for the response, ‘Finding the stores where it can be used’ per respondent's characteristics, it was relatively high in male, university students and who were currently students (with part-time jobs).
● As for the response, ‘Finding the stores where it can be used’ per respondent's characteristics, it were relatively high in Yangpyeong County (n=1) with 100.0% followed by Hwaseong City (80.0%, n=5) and Pyeongtaek City (75.0%, n=4).
163 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Table 42-1] Difficulties in using mobile-type (app. installation) of local currency – Per respondent's characteristics [Base: Respondents who have selected mobile (app. installation) type of local currency, n=360, Unit: %]
Inconvenient Unfriendly Finding the Restriction Inconvenient payment merchants stores in business app No. of process arising from where it field and type download Others cases (payment transaction can be of franchise and procedure of local used store installation and time taken) currency
All (360) 41.4 24.7 16.1 5.6 5.6 6.7
Male (136) 48.5 18.4 14.0 4.4 5.9 8.8 Gender Female (224) 37.1 28.6 17.4 6.3 5.4 5.4
High graduate and below (54) 42.6 18.5 16.7 9.3 7.4 5.6 Educational University student (73) 43.8 17.8 19.2 6.8 4.1 8.2 background University graduate and above (233) 40.3 28.3 15.0 4.3 5.6 6.4
Single (352) 41.5 24.4 16.5 5.4 5.4 6.8 Marital Married (7) 42.9 28.6 0.0 14.3 14.3 0.0 status Others (1) 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1-person household (47) 46.8 21.3 14.9 2.1 8.5 6.4
Lives with children (4) 25.0 25.0 0.0 25.0 25.0 0.0 Household type Lives with parents (3) 66.7 33.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Others (276) 38.4 26.1 17.4 6.2 4.7 7.2
Student (with part-time job) (30) 60.0 16.7 10.0 3.3 6.7 3.3
Student (without part-time job) (36) 47.2 11.1 13.9 16.7 2.8 8.3
Current Unemployed (50) 48.0 22.0 16.0 2.0 2.0 10.0 identity status Soldier (75) 37.3 25.3 16.0 6.7 9.3 5.3
Employed (6) 0.0 66.7 16.7 0.0 16.7 0.0
Others (180) 41.1 25.0 17.8 4.4 5.0 6.7
Below KRW 1 million (13) 46.2 46.2 0.0 0.0 7.7 0.0
KRW 1~below 2 million (16) 25.0 12.5 18.8 18.8 25.0 0.0
KRW 2~below 3 million (68) 39.7 27.9 11.8 5.9 4.4 10.3 Household KRW 3~below 4 million (90) 45.6 25.6 16.7 6.7 3.3 2.2 income KRW 4~below 5 million (30) 30.0 26.7 13.3 0.0 6.7 23.3
KRW 5~below 6 million (44) 40.9 22.7 20.5 4.5 6.8 4.5
Above KRW 6 million (32) 34.4 28.1 21.9 9.4 3.1 3.1
High (80) 48.8 22.5 15.0 2.5 5.0 6.3 Standard Mid (44) 43.2 22.7 11.4 11.4 6.8 4.5 of living Low (147) 40.8 25.9 17.7 5.4 3.4 6.8
164 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
[Table 42-2] Difficulties in using mobile-type (app. installation) of local currency – Per region of residence [Base: Respondents who have selected mobile (app. installation) type of local currency, n=360, Unit: %]
Inconvenient Finding the Restriction Unfriendly payment Inconvenient stores in business merchants No. of process app where it field and type arising from Others cases (payment download and can be of franchise transaction procedure installation used store of local currency and time taken)
All (City) (360) 41.4 24.7 16.1 5.6 5.6 6.7
Suwon (15) 46.7 40.0 6.7 6.7 0.0 0.0
Seongnam (47) 48.9 25.5 2.1 10.6 10.6 2.1
Bucheon (5) 40.0 0.0 20.0 20.0 0.0 20.0
Anyang (6) 50.0 33.3 0.0 0.0 16.7 0.0
Ansan (8) 37.5 50.0 0.0 12.5 0.0 0.0
Yongin (10) 70.0 30.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pyeongtaek (4) 75.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Gwangmyeong (4) 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Siheung (135) 33.3 20.0 32.6 2.2 3.7 8.1
Gunpo (2) 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Hwaseong (5) 80.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Icheon (66) 45.5 21.2 13.6 6.1 1.5 12.1
Gimpo (2) 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 0.0
Region Gwangju (4) 0.0 75.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.0 of residence Anseong (3) 33.3 0.0 33.3 0.0 0.0 33.3
Hanam (1) 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Uiwang (1) 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0
Osan (1) 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Gwacheon (1) 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Goyang (15) 46.7 20.0 0.0 6.7 26.7 0.0
Uijeongbu (3) 33.3 33.3 0.0 33.3 0.0 0.0
Namyangju (4) 25.0 75.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Paju (5) 60.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 20.0
Guri (2) 50.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 0.0
Pocheon (3) 66.7 33.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Dongducheon (4) 0.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 0.0
Gapyeong County (3) 66.7 0.0 0.0 33.3 0.0 0.0
Yeoncheon County (1) 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
165 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
2 Preferred type of local currency in the future
If you receive youth basic income in the future, what would be the Q most preferred type of local currency?
As for the preferred type of local currency in the future, ‘Card-type’ was the highest with 69.2% followed by ‘Mobile-type’ (27.6%) and ‘Note (paper)-type’ (3.3%).
[Figure 58] Preferred type of local currency in the future [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
69.2
27.6
3.3
Note (paper)-type Card-type Mobile-type
Analysis per characteristics
● Card-type of local currency was selected the most in all respondent's characteristics.
166 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
[Table 43-1] Preferred type of local currency in the future – Per respondent's characteristics
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
No. of cases Note (paper)-type Card-type Mobile-type
All (3500) 3.3 69.2 27.6
Male (1221) 3.7 72.0 24.3 Gender Female (2279) 3.0 67.7 29.3
High graduate and below (500) 3.6 71.4 25.0 Educational University student (826) 3.8 71.3 24.9 background University graduate and above (2174) 3.0 67.8 29.2
Single (3414) 3.2 69.2 27.6 Marital Married (79) 5.1 68.4 26.6 status Others (7) 0.0 71.4 28.6
1-person household (324) 3.1 69.4 27.5
Married household (27) 7.4 63.0 29.6 Household Lives with children (37) 2.7 75.7 21.6 type Lives with parents (2846) 3.3 69.1 27.6
Others (266) 2.6 69.2 28.2
Student (with part-time job) (327) 3.7 70.0 26.3
Student (without part-time job) (438) 3.2 72.4 24.4
Current Unemployed (934) 2.9 71.2 25.9 identity status Soldier (32) 6.3 65.6 28.1
Employed (1607) 3.4 66.5 30.1
Others (162) 2.5 74.1 23.5
Below KRW 1 million (175) 4.6 74.3 21.1
KRW 1~below 2 million (546) 3.5 70.1 26.4
KRW 2~below 3 million (842) 2.5 71.3 26.2 Household KRW 3~below 4 million (450) 2.0 70.9 27.1 income KRW 4~below 5 million (522) 3.1 69.7 27.2
KRW 5~below 6 million (291) 3.8 66.0 30.2
Above KRW 6 million (674) 4.5 64.2 31.3
High (398) 5.3 63.6 31.2 Standard Mid (1476) 2.6 69.0 28.4 of living Low (1626) 3.4 70.7 26.0
167 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Table 43-2] Preferred type of local currency in the future – Per region of residence
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
No. of cases Note (paper)-type Card-type Mobile-type
All (City) (3500) 3.3 69.2 27.6
Suwon (363) 1.7 67.2 31.1
Seongnam (254) 16.5 66.5 16.9
Bucheon (261) 1.1 75.1 23.8
Anyang (185) 3.2 75.1 21.6
Ansan (239) 0.0 77.4 22.6
Yongin (270) 3.3 67.0 29.6
Pyeongtaek (131) 3.1 70.2 26.7
Gwangmyeong (96) 0.0 68.8 31.3
Siheung (144) 7.6 51.4 41.0
Gunpo (84) 2.4 79.8 17.9
Hwaseong (155) 3.2 61.3 35.5
Icheon (39) 5.1 76.9 17.9
Gimpo (85) 1.2 47.1 51.8
Gwangju (86) 1.2 69.8 29.1
Anseong (37) 0.0 75.7 24.3 Region of Hanam (43) 2.3 72.1 25.6 residence Uiwang (46) 2.2 73.9 23.9
Osan (53) 0.0 67.9 32.1
Gwacheon (20) 5.0 70.0 25.0
Yeoju (20) 0.0 70.0 30.0
Yangpyeong County (20) 5.0 75.0 20.0
Goyang (280) 0.4 66.1 33.6
Uijeongbu (130) 3.1 77.7 19.2
Namyangju (160) 1.9 73.1 25.0
Paju (96) 2.1 69.8 28.1
Guri (54) 7.4 57.4 35.2
Pocheon (35) 8.6 68.6 22.9
Yangju (48) 2.1 66.7 31.3
Dongducheon (26) 0.0 73.1 26.9
Gapyeong County (20) 0.0 95.0 5.0
Yeoncheon County (20) 0.0 80.0 20.0
168 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
Awareness on “regions” where 3 Gyeonggi local currency can be used
Gyeonggi local currency is being issued by 31 cities and counties within Gyeonggi Q Province and it can only be used within cities and counties. Are you aware of this?
As for the question on being aware that Gyeonggi local currency can only be used within 31 cities and counties, 95.8% were 'Aware' which was higher than 'Not aware' (4.2%).
[Figure 59] Awareness on "regions" where Gyeonggi local currency can be used
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
Not aware Aware 4.2% 95.8%
Analysis per characteristics
● As for the response, 'Aware' per respondent's characteristics, it was relatively high in male, university students, who were currently soldiers and in middle class in terms of standard of living.
● As for the response 'Aware' per region of residence, Gwancheon City (n=20) and Yangpyeong County (n=26), Yeoncheon County (n=20) were the highest with 100.0% respectively followed by Uijeongbu City (99.2%) and Guri City (98.1%).
169 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Table 44-1] Awareness on "regions" where Gyeonggi local currency can be used – Per respondent's characteristics [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
No. of cases Aware Not aware
All (3500) 95.8 4.2
Male (1221) 96.2 3.8 Gender Female (2279) 95.6 4.4
High graduate and below (500) 94.2 5.8 Educational University student (826) 96.4 3.6 background University graduate and above (2174) 96.0 4.0
Single (3414) 95.8 4.2 Marital Married (79) 96.2 3.8 status Others (7) 100.0 0.0
1-person household (324) 93.2 6.8
Married household (27) 92.6 7.4 Household Lives with children (37) 97.3 2.7 type Lives with parents (2846) 96.2 3.8
Others (266) 95.5 4.5
Student (with part-time job) (327) 96.3 3.7
Student (without part-time job) (438) 96.8 3.2
Current Unemployed (934) 94.4 5.6 identity status Soldier (32) 100.0 0.0
Employed (1607) 96.1 3.9
Others (162) 96.3 3.7
Below KRW 1 million (175) 89.1 10.9
KRW 1~below 2 million (546) 96.5 3.5
KRW 2~below 3 million (842) 96.0 4.0 Household KRW 3~below 4 million (450) 96.4 3.6 income KRW 4~below 5 million (522) 96.6 3.4
KRW 5~below 6 million (291) 95.9 4.1
Above KRW 6 million (674) 95.8 4.2
High (398) 94.7 5.3 Standard Mid (1476) 96.5 3.5 of living Low (1626) 95.5 4.5
170 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
[Table 44-2] Awareness on "regions" where Gyeonggi local currency can be used – Per place of residence [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
No. of cases Aware Not aware
All (City) (3500) 95.8 4.2
Suwon (363) 94.2 5.8
Seongnam (254) 92.9 7.1
Bucheon (261) 93.9 6.1
Anyang (185) 97.3 2.7
Ansan (239) 96.7 3.3
Yongin (270) 94.4 5.6
Pyeongtaek (131) 96.2 3.8
Gwangmyeong (96) 97.9 2.1
Siheung (144) 94.4 5.6
Gunpo (84) 96.4 3.6
Hwaseong (155) 95.5 4.5
Icheon (39) 97.4 2.6
Gimpo (85) 94.1 5.9
Gwangju (86) 95.3 4.7
Anseong (37) 94.6 5.4 Region of Hanam (43) 95.3 4.7 residence Uiwang (46) 97.8 2.2
Osan (53) 96.2 3.8
Gwacheon (20) 100.0 0.0
Yeoju (20) 95.0 5.0
Yangpyeong County (20) 100.0 0.0
Goyang (280) 97.5 2.5
Uijeongbu (130) 99.2 0.8
Namyangju (160) 96.9 3.1
Paju (96) 96.9 3.1
Guri (54) 98.1 1.9
Pocheon (35) 94.3 5.7
Yangju (48) 100.0 0.0
Dongducheon (26) 100.0 0.0
Gapyeong County (20) 95.0 5.0
Yeoncheon County (20) 100.0 0.0
171 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
Awareness on “stores” where Gyeonggi 4 local currency can be used
The use of Gyeonggi local currency is prohibited in supermarkets, department Q stores, Supreme Supermarkets, entertainment and gambling stores and others. Are you aware of this?
As for the question on being aware that Gyeonggi local currency can't be used supermarkets, department stores, Supreme Supermarkets (SSM), entertainment and gambling stores and others, 97.7% were 'Aware' which was higher than 'Not aware' (2.3%).
[Figure 60] Awareness on "stores" where Gyeonggi local currency can be used
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
Not aware Aware 2.3% 97.7%
Analysis per characteristics
● As for the response, 'Aware' per respondent's characteristics, it was relatively high in female, university students, who were currently students (without part-time job) and in middle class in terms of standard of living.
● As for the response 'Yes' per region of residence, Gwangmyeong City and Hanam City, Osan City (n=20), Yeoju City (n=20), Yangpyeong County (n=20), Uijeongbu City, Paju City, Guri City, Yangju City, YeoncheonCounty (n=20) were relatively high with 100.0% respectively.
172 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
[Table 45-1] Awareness on "stores" where Gyeonggi local currency can be used – Per respondent's characteristics [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
No. of cases Aware Not aware
All (3500) 97.7 2.3
Male (1221) 97.1 2.9 Gender Female (2279) 97.9 2.1
High graduate and below (500) 96.4 3.6 Educational University student (826) 98.2 1.8 background University graduate and above (2174) 97.7 2.3
Single (3414) 97.6 2.4 Marital Married (79) 98.7 1.3 status Others (7) 100.0 0.0
1-person household (324) 97.2 2.8
Married household (27) 100.0 0.0 Household Lives with children (37) 97.3 2.7 type Lives with parents (2846) 97.9 2.1
Others (266) 95.5 4.5
Student (with part-time job) (327) 97.2 2.8
Student (without part-time job) (438) 98.2 1.8
Current Unemployed (934) 97.4 2.6 identity status Soldier (32) 96.9 3.1
Employed (1607) 98.0 2.0
Others (162) 95.1 4.9
Below KRW 1 million (175) 96.0 4.0
KRW 1~below 2 million (546) 97.4 2.6
KRW 2~below 3 million (842) 97.7 2.3 Household KRW 3~below 4 million (450) 99.1 0.9 income KRW 4~below 5 million (522) 97.7 2.3
KRW 5~below 6 million (291) 96.9 3.1
Above KRW 6 million (674) 97.5 2.5
High (398) 96.5 3.5 Standard Mid (1476) 98.3 1.7 of living Low (1626) 97.4 2.6
173 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Table 45-2] Awareness on "stores" where Gyeonggi local currency can be used – Per place of residence [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
No. of cases Aware Not aware
All (City) (3500) 97.7 2.3
Suwon (363) 98.1 1.9
Seongnam (254) 93.7 6.3
Bucheon (261) 98.5 1.5
Anyang (185) 98.4 1.6
Ansan (239) 98.3 1.7
Yongin (270) 97.8 2.2
Pyeongtaek (131) 96.9 3.1
Gwangmyeong (96) 100.0 0.0
Siheung (144) 93.1 6.9
Gunpo (84) 97.6 2.4
Hwaseong (155) 98.1 1.9
Icheon (39) 92.3 7.7
Gimpo (85) 94.1 5.9
Gwangju (86) 95.3 4.7
Anseong (37) 97.3 2.7 Region of Hanam (43) 100.0 0.0 residence Uiwang (46) 97.8 2.2
Osan (53) 100.0 0.0
Gwacheon (20) 95.0 5.0
Yeoju (20) 100.0 0.0
Yangpyeong County (20) 100.0 0.0
Goyang (280) 99.6 0.4
Uijeongbu (130) 100.0 0.0
Namyangju (160) 98.8 1.3
Paju (96) 100.0 0.0
Guri (54) 100.0 0.0
Pocheon (35) 97.1 2.9
Yangju (48) 100.0 0.0
Dongducheon (26) 96.2 3.8
Gapyeong County (20) 85.0 15.0
Yeoncheon County (20) 100.0 0.0
174 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
Awareness on 30% income tax deduction 5 when using Gyeonggi local currency
Cash receipt and 30% income tax deduction can be received when using Q Gyeonggi local currency. Are you aware of this?
As for the question on being aware that cash receipt and 30% income tax deduction can be received when using Gyeonggi local currency, 70.5% were 'Aware' which was higher than 'Not aware' (29.5%).
[Figure 61] Awareness on 30% income tax deduction when using Gyeonggi local currency
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
Aware Not 70.5% aware 29.5%
Analysis per characteristics
● As for the response, 'Aware' per respondent's characteristics, it was relatively high in female, above university graduates and with lower standard of living.
● As for the response 'Yes' per region of residence, Yeoju City (n=20) was the highest with 90.0% followed by Pocheon City (82.9%) and Hanam City (79.1%).
175 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Table 46-1] Awareness on 30% income tax deduction when using Gyeonggi local currency – Per respondent's characteristics [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
No. of cases Aware Not aware
All (3500) 70.5 29.5
Male (1221) 66.7 33.3 Gender Female (2279) 72.5 27.5
High graduate and below (500) 72.0 28.0 Educational University student (826) 63.1 36.9 background University graduate and above (2174) 72.9 27.1
Single (3414) 70.2 29.8 Marital Married (79) 81.0 19.0 status Others (7) 85.7 14.3
1-person household (324) 68.5 31.5
Married household (27) 85.2 14.8 Household Lives with children (37) 81.1 18.9 type Lives with parents (2846) 71.0 29.0
Others (266) 63.5 36.5
Student (with part-time job) (327) 63.6 36.4
Student (without part-time job) (438) 59.4 40.6
Current Unemployed (934) 69.5 30.5 identity status Soldier (32) 50.0 50.0
Employed (1607) 75.2 24.8
Others (162) 76.5 23.5
Below KRW 1 million (175) 66.3 33.7
KRW 1~below 2 million (546) 71.8 28.2
KRW 2~below 3 million (842) 72.8 27.2 Household KRW 3~below 4 million (450) 69.1 30.9 income KRW 4~below 5 million (522) 69.5 30.5
KRW 5~below 6 million (291) 64.3 35.7
Above KRW 6 million (674) 71.8 28.2
High (398) 65.6 34.4 Standard Mid (1476) 70.7 29.3 of living Low (1626) 71.5 28.5
176 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
[Table 46-2] Awareness on 30% income tax deduction when using Gyeonggi local currency – Per region of residence [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
No. of cases Aware Not aware
All (City) (3500) 70.5 29.5
Suwon (363) 70.5 29.5
Seongnam (254) 39.4 60.6
Bucheon (261) 75.5 24.5
Anyang (185) 75.7 24.3
Ansan (239) 77.0 23.0
Yongin (270) 67.0 33.0
Pyeongtaek (131) 67.2 32.8
Gwangmyeong (96) 75.0 25.0
Siheung (144) 66.0 34.0
Gunpo (84) 69.0 31.0
Hwaseong (155) 74.2 25.8
Icheon (39) 76.9 23.1
Gimpo (85) 71.8 28.2
Gwangju (86) 75.6 24.4
Anseong (37) 70.3 29.7 Region of Hanam (43) 79.1 20.9 residence Uiwang (46) 71.7 28.3
Osan (53) 71.7 28.3
Gwacheon (20) 70.0 30.0
Yeoju (20) 90.0 10.0
Yangpyeong County (20) 60.0 40.0
Goyang (280) 75.4 24.6
Uijeongbu (130) 72.3 27.7
Namyangju (160) 74.4 25.6
Paju (96) 78.1 21.9
Guri (54) 70.4 29.6
Pocheon (35) 82.9 17.1
Yangju (48) 77.1 22.9
Dongducheon (26) 73.1 26.9
Gapyeong County (20) 65.0 35.0
Yeoncheon County (20) 70.0 30.0
177 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
Awareness on payment method of 6 Gyeonggi local currency
Card-type of Gyeonggi local currency can be used for payment in any Q franchise store. Are you aware of this?
As for the question on being aware that card-type of Gyeonggi local currency can be used for payment in any franchise store, 83.7% were 'Aware' which was higher than 'Not aware' (16.3%).
[Figure 62] Awareness on payment method of Gyeonggi local currency
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
Not Aware aware 83.7% 16.3%
Analysis per characteristics
● As for the response, 'Aware' per respondent's characteristics, it was relatively high in male, university students, who were currently soldiers and in middle class in terms of standard of living.
● As for the response 'Yes' per region of residence, YeoncheonCounty (n=20) was the highest with 100.0% followed by Hanam City (95.3%) and Gwacheon City (95.0%).
178 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
[Table 47-1] Awareness on payment method of Gyeonggi local currency – Per respondent's characteristics [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
No. of cases Aware Not aware
All (3500) 83.7 16.3
Male (1221) 86.8 13.2 Gender Female (2279) 82.1 17.9
High graduate and below (500) 83.6 16.4 Educational University student (826) 84.6 15.4 background University graduate and above (2174) 83.4 16.6
Single (3414) 83.7 16.3 Marital Married (79) 83.5 16.5 status Others (7) 100.0 0.0
1-person household (324) 81.5 18.5
Married household (27) 77.8 22.2 Household Lives with children (37) 91.9 8.1 type Lives with parents (2846) 84.3 15.7
Others (266) 79.7 20.3
Student (with part-time job) (327) 80.7 19.3
Student (without part-time job) (438) 84.7 15.3
Current Unemployed (934) 84.5 15.5 identity status Soldier (32) 93.8 6.3
Employed (1607) 82.9 17.1
Others (162) 89.5 10.5
Below KRW 1 million (175) 82.3 17.7
KRW 1~below 2 million (546) 83.5 16.5
KRW 2~below 3 million (842) 84.0 16.0 Household KRW 3~below 4 million (450) 83.3 16.7 income KRW 4~below 5 million (522) 84.7 15.3
KRW 5~below 6 million (291) 84.9 15.1
Above KRW 6 million (674) 83.1 16.9
High (398) 83.2 16.8 Standard Mid (1476) 84.0 16.0 of living Low (1626) 83.6 16.4
179 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Table 47-2] Awareness on payment method of Gyeonggi local currency – Per region of residence
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
No. of cases Aware Not aware
All (City) (3500) 83.7 16.3
Suwon (363) 84.8 15.2
Seongnam (254) 78.3 21.7
Bucheon (261) 82.4 17.6
Anyang (185) 84.3 15.7
Ansan (239) 91.6 8.4
Yongin (270) 83.0 17.0
Pyeongtaek (131) 88.5 11.5
Gwangmyeong (96) 83.3 16.7
Siheung (144) 63.9 36.1
Gunpo (84) 88.1 11.9
Hwaseong (155) 81.3 18.7
Icheon (39) 76.9 23.1
Gimpo (85) 76.5 23.5
Gwangju (86) 88.4 11.6
Anseong (37) 81.1 18.9 Region of Hanam (43) 95.3 4.7 residence Uiwang (46) 87.0 13.0
Osan (53) 90.6 9.4
Gwacheon (20) 95.0 5.0
Yeoju (20) 90.0 10.0
Yangpyeong County (20) 85.0 15.0
Goyang (280) 84.3 15.7
Uijeongbu (130) 84.6 15.4
Namyangju (160) 83.1 16.9
Paju (96) 88.5 11.5
Guri (54) 83.3 16.7
Pocheon (35) 80.0 20.0
Yangju (48) 89.6 10.4
Dongducheon (26) 76.9 23.1
Gapyeong County (20) 90.0 10.0
Yeoncheon County (20) 100.0 0.0
180 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
Awareness on revitalization of local economy 7 and increase in sales of small businesses
In case that Gyeonggi local currency settles down successfully, do you think it would help Q revitalize the local economy and increase sales of small businesses and others?
As for the question on whether Gyeonggi local currency would revitalize the local economy and increase sales of small businesses in case it settles down successfully, 81.7% responded by saying ‘Yes’ (Very so: 36.8% + Mostly so: 44.9%) which was higher than 5.7% who responded by saying ‘Not so’ (Not so much: 4.4% + Not at all: 1.3%).
[Figure 63] Awareness on revitalization of local economy [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %] and increase in sales of small businesses
Not so Yes
Not so 44.9 5.7% 36.8 Average Yes 77.84 out Average 81.7% of 100 12.6% points
12.6
1.3 4.4
Not at all Not so much Average Mostly so Very so
Analysis per characteristics
● As for the response, 'Yes' per respondent's characteristics, it was relatively high in male, university students, who were currently students (with part-time job) and with lower standard of living.
● As for the response 'Yes' per region of residence, Gapyeong County (n=20) were the highest with 100.0% followed by Gimpo City (92.9%) and Ansan City (89.5%).
181 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Table 48-1] Awareness on revitalization of local economy and increase in sales of small businesses – Per respondent's characteristics [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
[Average No. of Not at Not so Mostly Very Average [No] [Average] [Quite so] converted cases all much so so to 100 pts]
All (3500) 1.3 4.4 12.6 44.9 36.8 5.7 12.6 81.7 77.84
Male (1221) 2.5 4.0 11.2 44.3 38.0 6.5 11.2 82.3 77.85 Gender Female (2279) 0.7 4.6 13.4 45.2 36.1 5.3 13.4 81.3 77.84
High graduate and below (500) 0.6 3.6 18.8 37.8 39.2 4.2 18.8 77.0 77.85 Educational University student (826) 2.5 5.1 9.6 45.6 37.2 7.6 9.6 82.8 77.45 background University graduate and above (2174) 1.1 4.3 12.4 46.2 36.1 5.3 12.4 82.3 77.99
Single (3414) 1.4 4.4 12.5 45.0 36.7 5.8 12.5 81.7 77.81 Marital Married (79) 0.0 3.8 17.7 41.8 36.7 3.8 17.7 78.5 77.85 status Others (7) 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 0.0 0.0 100.0 92.86
1-person household (324) 1.2 4.0 10.8 41.7 42.3 5.2 10.8 84.0 79.94
Married household (27) 0.0 3.7 14.8 37.0 44.4 3.7 14.8 81.5 80.56 Household Lives with children (37) 0.0 2.7 18.9 45.9 32.4 2.7 18.9 78.4 77.03 type Lives with parents (2846) 1.3 4.5 12.6 45.3 36.3 5.8 12.6 81.6 77.68
Others (266) 2.3 3.4 13.9 45.5 35.0 5.6 13.9 80.5 76.88
Student (with part-time job) (327) 1.8 3.7 7.6 47.4 39.4 5.5 7.6 86.9 79.74
Student (without part-time job) (438) 2.5 5.0 9.6 47.3 35.6 7.5 9.6 82.9 77.11
Current Unemployed (934) 1.1 5.1 14.7 43.7 35.4 6.2 14.7 79.1 76.82 identity status Soldier (32) 3.1 6.3 12.5 59.4 18.8 9.4 12.5 78.1 71.09
Employed (1607) 1.1 3.9 13.1 44.8 37.1 5.0 13.1 81.9 78.20
Others (162) 0.6 3.7 14.8 38.3 42.6 4.3 14.8 80.9 79.63
Below KRW 1 million (175) 2.3 6.3 20.6 36.0 34.9 8.6 20.6 70.9 73.71
KRW 1~below 2 million (546) 0.7 4.0 14.3 43.2 37.7 4.8 14.3 81.0 78.30
KRW 2~below 3 million (842) 1.2 3.1 13.9 44.3 37.5 4.3 13.9 81.8 78.47 Household KRW 3~below 4 million (450) 1.3 5.3 8.2 48.2 36.9 6.7 8.2 85.1 78.50 income KRW 4~below 5 million (522) 1.0 4.2 10.5 44.8 39.5 5.2 10.5 84.3 79.41
KRW 5~below 6 million (291) 1.4 4.1 13.1 49.8 31.6 5.5 13.1 81.4 76.55
Above KRW 6 million (674) 2.1 5.3 12.0 45.0 35.6 7.4 12.0 80.6 76.67
High (398) 3.3 6.8 9.5 42.5 37.9 10.1 9.5 80.4 76.26 Standard Mid (1476) 1.0 3.7 13.5 46.0 35.8 4.7 13.5 81.8 77.95 of living Low (1626) 1.2 4.4 12.6 44.5 37.4 5.5 12.6 81.9 78.14
182 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
[Table 48-2] Awareness on revitalization of local economy and increase in sales of small businesses – Per region of residence [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
[Average No. of Not at Not so Mostly Very Average [No] [Average] [Quite so] converted cases all much so so to 100 pts]
All (City) (3500) 1.3 4.4 12.6 44.9 36.8 5.7 12.6 81.7 77.84
Suwon (363) 1.7 6.1 14.0 44.6 33.6 7.7 14.0 78.2 75.62
Seongnam (254) 1.6 4.7 18.1 41.3 34.3 6.3 18.1 75.6 75.49
Bucheon (261) 1.1 5.0 12.6 44.8 36.4 6.1 12.6 81.2 77.59
Anyang (185) 2.2 4.3 8.1 46.5 38.9 6.5 8.1 85.4 78.92
Ansan (239) 0.4 1.3 8.8 47.7 41.8 1.7 8.8 89.5 82.32
Yongin (270) 2.2 6.3 11.5 46.3 33.7 8.5 11.5 80.0 75.74
Pyeongtaek (131) 0.8 3.8 18.3 44.3 32.8 4.6 18.3 77.1 76.15
Gwangmyeong (96) 2.1 7.3 10.4 35.4 44.8 9.4 10.4 80.2 78.39
Siheung (144) 1.4 3.5 9.0 43.1 43.1 4.9 9.0 86.1 80.73
Gunpo (84) 1.2 3.6 11.9 57.1 26.2 4.8 11.9 83.3 75.89
Hwaseong (155) 2.6 7.7 17.4 40.6 31.6 10.3 17.4 72.3 72.74
Icheon (39) 0.0 7.7 15.4 43.6 33.3 7.7 15.4 76.9 75.64
Gimpo (85) 1.2 2.4 3.5 55.3 37.6 3.5 3.5 92.9 81.47
Gwangju (86) 0.0 5.8 14.0 48.8 31.4 5.8 14.0 80.2 76.45
Anseong (37) 0.0 5.4 16.2 37.8 40.5 5.4 16.2 78.4 78.38 Region of Hanam (43) 2.3 2.3 11.6 48.8 34.9 4.7 11.6 83.7 77.91 residence Uiwang (46) 2.2 0.0 8.7 37.0 52.2 2.2 8.7 89.1 84.24
Osan (53) 0.0 0.0 18.9 41.5 39.6 0.0 18.9 81.1 80.19
Gwacheon (20) 5.0 0.0 20.0 30.0 45.0 5.0 20.0 75.0 77.50
Yeoju (20) 0.0 5.0 20.0 20.0 55.0 5.0 20.0 75.0 81.25
Yangpyeong County (20) 0.0 10.0 5.0 50.0 35.0 10.0 5.0 85.0 77.50
Goyang (280) 1.1 3.9 13.6 43.9 37.5 5.0 13.6 81.4 78.21
Uijeongbu (130) 1.5 4.6 12.3 46.2 35.4 6.2 12.3 81.5 77.31
Namyangju (160) 0.6 2.5 9.4 48.8 38.8 3.1 9.4 87.5 80.63
Paju (96) 0.0 3.1 14.6 51.0 31.3 3.1 14.6 82.3 77.60
Guri (54) 3.7 3.7 7.4 35.2 50.0 7.4 7.4 85.2 81.02
Pocheon (35) 0.0 2.9 17.1 48.6 31.4 2.9 17.1 80.0 77.14
Yangju (48) 0.0 2.1 18.8 39.6 39.6 2.1 18.8 79.2 79.17
Dongducheon (26) 3.8 3.8 3.8 50.0 38.5 7.7 3.8 88.5 78.85
Gapyeong County (20) 0.0 0.0 0.0 65.0 35.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 83.75
Yeoncheon County (20) 0.0 5.0 15.0 30.0 50.0 5.0 15.0 80.0 81.25
183 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
8 Improvements when using local currency
What do you think needs to be improved the most in the future Q when using local currency?
As for the question on what needed to be improved the most when using local currency, ‘Expansion and diversification of franchise store’ was the highest with 53.5% followed by ‘Expansion of usage area to desired regions within Gyeonggi Province other than the place of residence’ (17.6%) and ‘Education regarding franchise store merchants' (10.3%).
[Figure 64] Improvements when using local currency [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
53.5
17.6 10.3 9.3 4.9 2.0 2.4
Expansion Expansion of Education Promotion Reinforcement Education on Others and usage area to regarding (Posting of payment usage method diversification desired regions franchise store of franchise convenience for consumers of franchise within Gyeonggi merchants stores in bulletin stores Province other boards and than theplace of others) residence
Analysis per characteristics
● As for the response, ‘Expansion and diversification of franchise store’ per respondent's characteristics, it was relatively high in male, with lower educational background and who were currently students (with part-time job).
● As for the response ‘Expansion and diversification of franchise store’ per region of residence, Pocheon City was the highest with 65.7% followed by Uijeongbu City (61.5%), Pyeongtaek City and Anyang City (59.5% respectively).
184 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
[Table 49-1] Improvements when using local currency – Per respondent's characteristics
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
Expansion Expansion of Education Promotion Reinforcement Education and usage area to regarding (Posting of payment on usage diversification desired regions franchise of convenience method for No. of of franchise within Gyeonggi store franchise consumers Others cases stores Province merchants stores other than in bulletin the place of boards residence and others)
All (3500) 53.5 17.6 10.3 9.3 4.9 2.0 2.4
Male (1221) 54.1 16.1 8.2 11.4 4.6 2.1 3.4 Gender Female (2279) 53.1 18.4 11.4 8.2 5.1 1.9 1.8
High graduate and below (500) 54.6 16.8 9.8 9.2 4.8 2.4 2.4 Educational University student (826) 54.2 18.8 8.7 8.0 4.7 2.3 3.3 background University graduate and above (2174) 52.9 17.4 11.0 9.8 5.0 1.8 2.1
Single (3414) 53.7 17.7 10.0 9.3 5.0 2.0 2.4 Marital Married (79) 43.0 16.5 21.5 10.1 3.8 2.5 2.5 status Others (7) 28.6 14.3 28.6 28.6 0.0 0.0 0.0
1-person household (324) 54.0 17.9 10.2 8.6 4.6 1.9 2.8
Married household (27) 37.0 18.5 33.3 7.4 0.0 0.0 3.7 Household Lives with children (37) 43.2 18.9 13.5 16.2 5.4 2.7 0.0 type Lives with parents (2846) 53.8 17.5 10.3 9.0 5.0 2.1 2.4
Others (266) 52.6 18.4 7.9 13.2 4.5 1.5 1.9
Student (with part-time job) (327) 55.4 16.8 8.9 8.9 4.3 2.1 3.7
Student (without part-time job) (438) 51.4 18.9 6.8 12.1 5.0 3.4 2.3
Current Unemployed (934) 54.9 17.3 10.3 8.1 5.6 1.8 1.9 identity status Soldier (32) 53.1 9.4 6.3 25.0 6.3 0.0 0.0 Employed (1607) 53.3 17.5 11.4 9.0 4.7 1.8 2.4
Others (162) 48.8 20.4 12.3 9.9 4.3 1.2 3.1
Below KRW 1 million (175) 50.3 15.4 12.6 10.3 6.3 1.7 3.4
KRW 1~below 2 million (546) 53.8 17.0 10.4 8.6 5.3 2.2 2.6
KRW 2~below 3 million (842) 56.8 17.8 9.0 9.3 4.2 1.4 1.5 Household KRW 3~below 4 million (450) 50.0 18.7 13.1 9.3 3.6 2.7 2.7 income KRW 4~below 5 million (522) 54.8 17.0 8.4 10.0 4.6 1.9 3.3
KRW 5~below 6 million (291) 49.8 18.9 13.7 8.6 5.2 1.4 2.4
Above KRW 6 million (674) 52.7 17.7 9.2 9.5 6.2 2.5 2.2
High (398) 53.3 16.8 9.5 8.5 5.3 3.8 2.8 Standard Mid (1476) 53.0 18.6 9.3 10.0 4.9 1.7 2.6 of living Low (1626) 53.9 17.0 11.4 8.9 4.9 1.8 2.2
185 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Table 49-2] Improvements when using local currency – Per region of residence
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
Expansion xpansion of Education Promotion Reinforcement Education and usage area to regarding (Posting of payment on usage diversification desired regions franchise of franchise convenience method for No. of of franchise within Gyeonggi store stores consumers Others cases stores Province other merchants in bulletin than the place of boards residence and others)
All (City) (3500) 53.5 17.6 10.3 9.3 4.9 2.0 2.4 Suwon (363) 55.4 14.3 11.8 9.4 5.2 1.4 2.5 Seongnam (254) 55.9 11.8 13.0 11.0 4.3 2.0 2.0 Bucheon (261) 54.0 13.4 12.6 11.9 4.2 1.9 1.9 Anyang (185) 59.5 9.7 14.6 8.1 4.9 0.5 2.7 Ansan (239) 47.3 26.8 7.5 9.2 4.2 2.5 2.5 Yongin (270) 54.8 22.2 7.0 10.4 1.5 1.5 2.6 Pyeongtaek (131) 59.5 16.8 9.9 6.9 2.3 2.3 2.3 Gwangmyeong (96) 54.2 14.6 15.6 9.4 2.1 1.0 3.1 Siheung (144) 53.5 6.9 9.0 4.9 19.4 2.8 3.5 Gunpo (84) 45.2 21.4 11.9 11.9 4.8 4.8 0.0 Hwaseong (155) 55.5 20.6 9.0 5.2 4.5 1.9 3.2 Icheon (39) 59.0 17.9 5.1 7.7 2.6 2.6 5.1 Gimpo (85) 49.4 16.5 7.1 8.2 11.8 4.7 2.4 Gwangju (86) 51.2 20.9 8.1 7.0 8.1 2.3 2.3 Anseong (37) 32.4 29.7 8.1 24.3 2.7 2.7 0.0 Region of Hanam (43) 46.5 23.3 7.0 9.3 9.3 0.0 4.7 residence Uiwang (46) 54.3 28.3 6.5 6.5 2.2 0.0 2.2 Osan (53) 37.7 34.0 11.3 9.4 7.5 0.0 0.0 Gwacheon (20) 45.0 35.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 Yeoju (20) 50.0 25.0 10.0 10.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 Yangpyeong County (20) 40.0 25.0 5.0 15.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Goyang (280) 56.8 10.7 10.7 9.6 5.0 3.2 3.9 Uijeongbu (130) 61.5 11.5 10.8 6.9 6.2 1.5 1.5 Namyangju (160) 55.6 20.6 10.0 10.0 1.3 1.3 1.3 Paju (96) 51.0 21.9 5.2 13.5 5.2 2.1 1.0 Guri (54) 48.1 18.5 13.0 9.3 3.7 3.7 3.7 Pocheon (35) 65.7 17.1 5.7 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 Yangju (48) 43.8 33.3 14.6 6.3 2.1 0.0 0.0 Dongducheon (26) 38.5 19.2 19.2 19.2 0.0 0.0 3.8 Gapyeong County (20) 40.0 50.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Yeoncheon County (20) 35.0 40.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 10.0 5.0
186 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
Change in level of interest through 9 receipt of local currency
Q Change in level of interest through receipt of local currency
As for the question on the change in level of interest through receipt of youth basic income as local currency, ‘Interest in the revitalization of local economy increased’ was the highest with 71.39 points followed by ‘Interest in fostering local community increased’ with 66.54.
[Figure 65] Change in level of interest through receipt of local currency
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
71.39 66.54
Interest in the revitalization of Interest in fostering local local economy increased community increased
187 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Table 50-1] Change in level of interest through receipt of local currency – Per respondent's characteristics [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
Interest in the revitalization of Interest in fostering local No. of cases local economy increased community increased
All (3500) 71.39 66.54
Male (1221) 70.56 66.03 Gender Female (2279) 71.84 66.82
High graduate and below (500) 70.80 64.80 Educational University student (826) 71.10 66.62 background University graduate and above (2174) 71.64 66.92
Single (3414) 71.46 66.58 Marital Married (79) 67.41 63.92 status Others (7) 85.71 78.57
1-person household (324) 71.99 69.21
Married household (27) 65.74 64.81 Household Lives with children (37) 67.57 62.16 type Lives with parents (2846) 71.44 66.44
Others (266) 71.24 65.23
Student (with part-time job) (327) 73.85 69.27
Student (without part-time job) (438) 68.84 64.44
Current Unemployed (934) 70.85 66.27 identity status Soldier (32) 71.88 65.63
Employed (1607) 71.97 66.74
Others (162) 70.68 66.51
Below KRW 1 million (175) 68.00 63.14
KRW 1~below 2 million (546) 71.79 67.86
KRW 2~below 3 million (842) 72.21 67.93 Household KRW 3~below 4 million (450) 72.78 68.28 income KRW 4~below 5 million (522) 71.74 66.91
KRW 5~below 6 million (291) 69.07 62.71
Above KRW 6 million (674) 70.73 64.84
High (398) 69.97 64.38 Standard Mid (1476) 71.43 66.72 of living Low (1626) 71.71 66.91
188 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
[Table 50-2] Change in level of interest through receipt of local currency – Per region of residence
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
Interest in the revitalization of Interest in fostering local No. of cases local economy increased community increased
All (City) (3500) 71.39 66.54
Suwon (363) 70.45 65.29
Seongnam (254) 69.69 63.88
Bucheon (261) 70.98 66.00
Anyang (185) 73.51 69.19
Ansan (239) 74.27 69.14
Yongin (270) 69.44 62.78
Pyeongtaek (131) 71.18 68.13
Gwangmyeong (96) 69.53 66.67
Siheung (144) 72.92 67.53
Gunpo (84) 69.94 64.58
Hwaseong (155) 68.55 64.84
Icheon (39) 66.67 62.18
Gimpo (85) 73.53 67.94
Gwangju (86) 70.64 67.44
Anseong (37) 69.59 65.54 Region of Hanam (43) 72.67 66.86 residence Uiwang (46) 74.46 72.83
Osan (53) 69.81 65.57
Gwacheon (20) 75.00 68.75
Yeoju (20) 73.75 72.50
Yangpyeong County (20) 72.50 66.25
Goyang (280) 72.14 67.41
Uijeongbu (130) 70.00 65.77
Namyangju (160) 74.22 67.81
Paju (96) 70.05 65.63
Guri (54) 75.00 72.69
Pocheon (35) 74.29 69.29
Yangju (48) 73.44 68.75
Dongducheon (26) 71.15 63.46
Gapyeong County (20) 70.00 67.50
Yeoncheon County (20) 73.75 72.50
189 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
1) Interest in revitalization of local economy
As for the question on whether interest in revitalization of local economy had increased, 70.8% responded by saying ‘Yes’ (Very so: 23.3% + Mostly so: 47.5%) which was higher than 6.4% who responded by saying ‘Not so’ (Not so much: 4.3% + Not at all: 2.1%).
[Figure 66] Interest in revitalization of local economy [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
Not so Yes Not so 6.4% 47.5
Average 71.39 out Yes Average of 100 70.8% 22.8% points 22.8 23.3
2.1 4.3
Not at all Not so much Average Mostly so Very so
Analysis per characteristics
● As for the response, 'Yes' per respondent's characteristics, it was relatively high in female, with higher education level and who were currently soldiers.
● As for the response 'Yes' per region of residence, Pocheon City was the highest with 80.0% followed by Yangju City (79.2%) and Hanam City (79.1%).
190 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
[Table 51-1] Interest in revitalization of local economy – Per respondent's characteristics
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
[Average No. of Not at Not so Mostly Very Average [No] [Average] [Quite so] converted cases all much so so to 100 pts]
All (3500) 2.1 4.3 22.8 47.5 23.3 6.4 22.8 70.8 71.39
Male (1221) 3.8 4.3 22.4 44.7 24.7 8.1 22.4 69.5 70.56 Gender Female (2279) 1.2 4.3 22.9 48.9 22.6 5.5 22.9 71.5 71.84
High graduate and below (500) 1.2 4.4 29.0 40.8 24.6 5.6 29.0 65.4 70.80 Educational University student (826) 3.8 4.2 20.8 46.2 24.9 8.0 20.8 71.2 71.10 background University graduate and above (2174) 1.7 4.3 22.1 49.4 22.4 6.0 22.1 71.9 71.64
Single (3414) 2.1 4.4 22.6 47.5 23.4 6.5 22.6 71.0 71.46 Marital Married (79) 3.8 1.3 34.2 43.0 17.7 5.1 34.2 60.8 67.41 status Others (7) 0.0 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 0.0 0.0 100.0 85.71
1-person household (324) 2.5 5.2 20.4 45.7 26.2 7.7 20.4 71.9 71.99
Married household (27) 3.7 3.7 40.7 29.6 22.2 7.4 40.7 51.9 65.74 Household Lives with children (37) 2.7 0.0 35.1 48.6 13.5 2.7 35.1 62.2 67.57 type Lives with parents (2846) 2.0 4.4 22.6 47.8 23.2 6.4 22.6 71.0 71.44
Others (266) 2.6 2.6 24.4 47.7 22.6 5.3 24.4 70.3 71.24
Student (with part-time job) (327) 2.4 3.1 19.9 45.9 28.7 5.5 19.9 74.6 73.85
Student (without part-time job) (438) 4.1 6.2 22.1 45.4 22.1 10.3 22.1 67.6 68.84
Current Unemployed (934) 1.8 4.6 23.8 48.0 21.8 6.4 23.8 69.8 70.85 identity status Soldier (32) 3.1 3.1 18.8 53.1 21.9 6.3 18.8 75.0 71.88
Employed (1607) 1.7 4.0 22.7 47.9 23.7 5.7 22.7 71.6 71.97
Others (162) 1.9 3.1 26.5 47.5 21.0 4.9 26.5 68.5 70.68
Below KRW 1 million (175) 4.0 4.6 30.3 37.7 23.4 8.6 30.3 61.1 68.00
KRW 1~below 2 million (546) 1.3 4.0 24.7 46.2 23.8 5.3 24.7 70.0 71.79
KRW 2~below 3 million (842) 1.5 3.6 22.7 48.9 23.3 5.1 22.7 72.2 72.21 Household KRW 3~below 4 million (450) 2.2 2.2 22.2 48.9 24.4 4.4 22.2 73.3 72.78 income KRW 4~below 5 million (522) 2.3 5.2 20.7 46.9 24.9 7.5 20.7 71.8 71.74
KRW 5~below 6 million (291) 3.1 4.8 23.0 50.9 18.2 7.9 23.0 69.1 69.07
Above KRW 6 million (674) 2.5 5.8 21.2 47.2 23.3 8.3 21.2 70.5 70.73
High (398) 4.0 8.3 19.1 41.0 27.6 12.3 19.1 68.6 69.97 Standard Mid (1476) 1.9 3.9 22.4 50.4 21.5 5.8 22.4 71.9 71.43 of living Low (1626) 1.9 3.7 24.0 46.4 24.0 5.6 24.0 70.4 71.71
191 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Table 51-2] Interest in revitalization of local economy – Per region of residence
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
[Average No. of Not at Not so Mostly Very Average [No] [Average] [Quite so] converted cases all much so so to 100 pts]
All (City) (3500) 2.1 4.3 22.8 47.5 23.3 6.4 22.8 70.8 71.39
Suwon (363) 2.8 5.2 24.5 42.4 25.1 8.0 24.5 67.5 70.45
Seongnam (254) 2.8 3.5 27.2 45.3 21.3 6.3 27.2 66.5 69.69
Bucheon (261) 3.1 5.7 18.4 49.8 23.0 8.8 18.4 72.8 70.98
Anyang (185) 1.1 5.9 18.9 45.9 28.1 7.0 18.9 74.1 73.51
Ansan (239) 1.3 3.3 18.4 51.0 25.9 4.6 18.4 77.0 74.27
Yongin (270) 4.1 4.1 23.0 47.8 21.1 8.1 23.0 68.9 69.44
Pyeongtaek (131) 2.3 1.5 23.7 54.2 18.3 3.8 23.7 72.5 71.18
Gwangmyeong (96) 3.1 5.2 24.0 45.8 21.9 8.3 24.0 67.7 69.53
Siheung (144) 1.4 4.9 19.4 49.3 25.0 6.3 19.4 74.3 72.92
Gunpo (84) 2.4 4.8 21.4 53.6 17.9 7.1 21.4 71.4 69.94
Hwaseong (155) 3.9 3.9 25.2 48.4 18.7 7.7 25.2 67.1 68.55
Icheon (39) 0.0 5.1 38.5 41.0 15.4 5.1 38.5 56.4 66.67
Gimpo (85) 1.2 3.5 21.2 48.2 25.9 4.7 21.2 74.1 73.53
Gwangju (86) 0.0 10.5 22.1 41.9 25.6 10.5 22.1 67.4 70.64
Anseong (37) 2.7 0.0 40.5 29.7 27.0 2.7 40.5 56.8 69.59 Region of Hanam (43) 2.3 2.3 16.3 60.5 18.6 4.7 16.3 79.1 72.67 residence Uiwang (46) 2.2 0.0 28.3 37.0 32.6 2.2 28.3 69.6 74.46
Osan (53) 1.9 1.9 30.2 47.2 18.9 3.8 30.2 66.0 69.81
Gwacheon (20) 0.0 10.0 15.0 40.0 35.0 10.0 15.0 75.0 75.00
Yeoju (20) 0.0 5.0 20.0 50.0 25.0 5.0 20.0 75.0 73.75
Yangpyeong County (20) 0.0 10.0 15.0 50.0 25.0 10.0 15.0 75.0 72.50
Goyang (280) 1.4 4.6 21.1 49.6 23.2 6.1 21.1 72.9 72.14
Uijeongbu (130) 1.5 6.2 26.2 43.1 23.1 7.7 26.2 66.2 70.00
Namyangju (160) 2.5 1.9 20.6 46.3 28.8 4.4 20.6 75.0 74.22
Paju (96) 0.0 3.1 31.3 47.9 17.7 3.1 31.3 65.6 70.05
Guri (54) 3.7 3.7 16.7 40.7 35.2 7.4 16.7 75.9 75.00
Pocheon (35) 0.0 0.0 20.0 62.9 17.1 0.0 20.0 80.0 74.29
Yangju (48) 0.0 4.2 16.7 60.4 18.8 4.2 16.7 79.2 73.44
Dongducheon (26) 3.8 0.0 23.1 53.8 19.2 3.8 23.1 73.1 71.15
Gapyeong County (20) 0.0 0.0 30.0 60.0 10.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 70.00
Yeoncheon County (20) 0.0 5.0 30.0 30.0 35.0 5.0 30.0 65.0 73.75
192 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
2) Interest in fostering local community
As for the question on whether interest in fostering local economy had increased, 59.0% responded by saying ‘Yes’ (Very so: 20.4% + Mostly so: 38.6%) which was higher than 10.3% who responded by saying ‘Not so’ (Not so much: 7.3% + Not at all: 2.9%).
[Figure 67] Interest in fostering local community [Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
Not so Yes
Not so 10.3% 38.6 30.7 Average Yes 66.54 out 20.4 59.0% of 100 points Average 30.7% 7.3 2.9
Not at all Not so much Average Mostly so Very so
Analysis per characteristics
● As for the response, 'Yes' per respondent's characteristics, it was relatively high in male, university students, who were currently students (with part-time jobs) and in middle class in terms of standard of living. ● As for the response 'Yes' per region of residence, Guri City was the highest with 72.2% followed by Pocheon City (71.4%) and Yeoju City (70.0%, n=20).
193 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Table 52-1] Interest in fostering local community – Per respondent's characteristics
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
[Average No. of Not at Not so Mostly Very Average [No] [Average] [Quite so] converted cases all much so so to 100 pts]
All (3500) 2.9 7.3 30.7 38.6 20.4 10.3 30.7 59.0 66.54
Male (1221) 4.7 7.5 28.4 38.0 21.5 12.1 28.4 59.5 66.03 Gender Female (2279) 2.0 7.3 31.9 38.9 19.8 9.3 31.9 58.8 66.82
High graduate and below (500) 2.0 8.0 38.6 31.6 19.8 10.0 38.6 51.4 64.80 Educational University student (826) 4.7 6.9 27.4 39.2 21.8 11.6 27.4 61.0 66.62 background University graduate and above (2174) 2.5 7.4 30.2 40.0 20.0 9.8 30.2 60.0 66.92
Single (3414) 2.9 7.5 30.6 38.6 20.5 10.4 30.6 59.1 66.58 Marital Married (79) 5.1 2.5 39.2 38.0 15.2 7.6 39.2 53.2 63.92 status Others (7) 0.0 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 0.0 14.3 85.7 78.57
1-person household (324) 3.1 6.8 25.6 39.2 25.3 9.9 25.6 64.5 69.21
Married household (27) 7.4 0.0 40.7 29.6 22.2 7.4 40.7 51.9 64.81 Household Lives with children (37) 2.7 2.7 45.9 40.5 8.1 5.4 45.9 48.6 62.16 type Lives with parents (2846) 2.8 7.8 30.6 38.5 20.3 10.6 30.6 58.8 66.44
Others (266) 3.8 4.9 35.0 39.5 16.9 8.6 35.0 56.4 65.23
Student (with part-time job) (327) 3.7 5.8 25.4 40.1 25.1 9.5 25.4 65.1 69.27
Student (without part-time job) (438) 5.0 9.8 27.2 38.4 19.6 14.8 27.2 58.0 64.44
Current Unemployed (934) 2.4 8.0 31.5 38.4 19.7 10.4 31.5 58.1 66.27 identity status Soldier (32) 3.1 9.4 28.1 40.6 18.8 12.5 28.1 59.4 65.63
Employed (1607) 2.7 6.5 32.3 38.3 20.2 9.1 32.3 58.6 66.74
Others (162) 1.9 8.0 31.5 39.5 19.1 9.9 31.5 58.6 66.51
Below KRW 1 million (175) 6.3 6.3 34.9 33.7 18.9 12.6 34.9 52.6 63.14
KRW 1~below 2 million (546) 1.5 6.2 33.5 37.0 21.8 7.7 33.5 58.8 67.86
KRW 2~below 3 million (842) 1.9 6.3 30.5 40.7 20.5 8.2 30.5 61.3 67.93 Household KRW 3~below 4 million (450) 3.1 5.8 28.0 41.1 22.0 8.9 28.0 63.1 68.28 income KRW 4~below 5 million (522) 3.3 6.9 30.1 38.5 21.3 10.2 30.1 59.8 66.91
KRW 5~below 6 million (291) 4.1 9.3 33.0 38.8 14.8 13.4 33.0 53.6 62.71
Above KRW 6 million (674) 3.7 10.4 28.9 36.8 20.2 14.1 28.9 57.0 64.84
High (398) 5.8 12.3 24.4 33.7 23.9 18.1 24.4 57.5 64.38 Standard Mid (1476) 2.4 7.2 30.1 41.7 18.6 9.6 30.1 60.3 66.72 of living Low (1626) 2.7 6.3 32.8 37.0 21.2 9.0 32.8 58.2 66.91
194 Section 3. Analysis of Survey Result
[Table 52-2] Interest in fostering local community – Per region of residence
[Base: All, n=3500, Unit: %]
[Average No. of Not at Not so Mostly Very Average [No] [Average] [Quite so] converted cases all much so so to 100 pts]
All (City) (3500) 2.9 7.3 30.7 38.6 20.4 10.3 30.7 59.0 66.54
Suwon (363) 3.6 9.1 31.4 34.4 21.5 12.7 31.4 55.9 65.29
Seongnam (254) 3.1 9.4 31.9 39.8 15.7 12.6 31.9 55.5 63.88
Bucheon (261) 3.8 7.7 28.0 41.8 18.8 11.5 28.0 60.5 66.00
Anyang (185) 1.6 7.6 29.2 35.7 25.9 9.2 29.2 61.6 69.19
Ansan (239) 2.5 4.2 28.5 43.9 20.9 6.7 28.5 64.9 69.14
Yongin (270) 5.2 7.4 35.2 35.6 16.7 12.6 35.2 52.2 62.78
Pyeongtaek (131) 3.1 3.8 31.3 41.2 20.6 6.9 31.3 61.8 68.13
Gwangmyeong (96) 5.2 5.2 34.4 28.1 27.1 10.4 34.4 55.2 66.67
Siheung (144) 1.4 7.6 30.6 40.3 20.1 9.0 30.6 60.4 67.53
Gunpo (84) 3.6 8.3 33.3 35.7 19.0 11.9 33.3 54.8 64.58
Hwaseong (155) 5.2 5.2 31.6 41.3 16.8 10.3 31.6 58.1 64.84
Icheon (39) 2.6 5.1 46.2 33.3 12.8 7.7 46.2 46.2 62.18
Gimpo (85) 2.4 8.2 24.7 44.7 20.0 10.6 24.7 64.7 67.94
Gwangju (86) 0.0 15.1 22.1 40.7 22.1 15.1 22.1 62.8 67.44
Anseong (37) 2.7 2.7 45.9 27.0 21.6 5.4 45.9 48.6 65.54 Region of Hanam (43) 2.3 7.0 30.2 41.9 18.6 9.3 30.2 60.5 66.86 residence Uiwang (46) 2.2 6.5 26.1 28.3 37.0 8.7 26.1 65.2 72.83
Osan (53) 3.8 5.7 32.1 41.5 17.0 9.4 32.1 58.5 65.57
Gwacheon (20) 0.0 10.0 30.0 35.0 25.0 10.0 30.0 60.0 68.75
Yeoju (20) 0.0 5.0 25.0 45.0 25.0 5.0 25.0 70.0 72.50
Yangpyeong County (20) 0.0 10.0 30.0 45.0 15.0 10.0 30.0 60.0 66.25
Goyang (280) 2.1 8.2 29.3 38.6 21.8 10.4 29.3 60.4 67.41
Uijeongbu (130) 3.1 11.5 28.5 33.1 23.8 14.6 28.5 56.9 65.77
Namyangju (160) 3.8 5.0 30.6 37.5 23.1 8.8 30.6 60.6 67.81
Paju (96) 0.0 7.3 37.5 40.6 14.6 7.3 37.5 55.2 65.63
Guri (54) 3.7 5.6 18.5 40.7 31.5 9.3 18.5 72.2 72.69
Pocheon (35) 0.0 5.7 22.9 60.0 11.4 5.7 22.9 71.4 69.29
Yangju (48) 0.0 4.2 33.3 45.8 16.7 4.2 33.3 62.5 68.75
Dongducheon (26) 3.8 7.7 34.6 38.5 15.4 11.5 34.6 53.8 63.46
Gapyeong County (20) 0.0 0.0 40.0 50.0 10.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 67.50
Yeoncheon County (20) 0.0 5.0 30.0 35.0 30.0 5.0 30.0 65.0 72.50
195 Section
4ㅣAppendix section 4 Appendix
Questionnaire Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
Satisfaction Survey on the Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
Greetings!
Gyeonggi Province and Gyeonggi Research Institute plan to carry out the 『Satisfaction Survey on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province』. As the name suggests, youth basic income in Gyeonggi Province is a trial project that started based on the concept of basic income and is playing the role of an enabling stepping stone to basic income to be given to everyone. In order for Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province to achieve such a role properly, your precious response is required.
Since April this year, Gyeonggi Province paid out youth basic income in local currency and the 1st quarter's payment has been completed. Now, we are to analyze how satisfied the recipients of basic income are and reflect it in the policy.
Your response will be used as baseline material for implementing upright policies so we seek for your sincere response despite your busy schedule. The detailed result of the survey provided shall never be used for any other purposes other than for statistical purposes pursuant to the Statistics Act Article 33 (Protection of Secrets).
Thank you very much.
November, 2019
SQ1 How many times in total have you received the ‘Youth Basic Income’ provided by Gyeonggi Province?
① Once (→ Stop survey) ② Twice (→ Stop survey) ③ 3 times (→ Go to Q1) ④ Applied but wasn’t selected (→ Stop survey)
198 Section 4. Appendix
II. Satisfaction related to youth basic income
※ Youth basic income is a project that pays KRW 250,000 per quarter, up to KRW 1 million a year in ‘Gyeonggi local currency’ to youths aged 24 who has resided within Gyeonggi Province for more than 3 years.
[Q1] TThe next question is about information accessibility of the youth basic income project. Please check to what extent you agree with each question.
Mostly Not so Not at Very so Average so much all
1) Promotion on the youth basic income project is ① ② ③ ④ ⑤ sufficient.
2) A lot of friends in the same age of 24 around me ① ② ③ ④ ⑤ are aware.
3) Information related to the youth basic income project (subject, application method, payment ① ② ③ ④ ⑤ method etc.) can be obtained easily.
4) 'Things to note' are well informed upon application. (Application each quarter, payment overlapping ① ② ③ ④ ⑤ with other supports not possible)
[Q2] The next question is about the application procedure of the youth basic income project. Please check to what extent you agree with each question.
Mostly Not so Not at Very so Average so much all
1) Online (Jababa job platform) application procedure ① ② ③ ④ ⑤ is convenient.
2) Satisfied with having to apply every quarter. ① ② ③ ④ ⑤
3) Required documents (Copy of resident registration) ① ② ③ ④ ⑤ are simple.
4) Period of application is sufficient. ① ② ③ ④ ⑤
199 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Q3] The next question is about the payment amount and method of the youth basic income project. Please check to what extent you agree with each question.
Mostly Not so Not at Very so Average so much all
1) Satisfied with the payment amount of youth basic income. (Up to KRW 1 million a year/KRW 250,000 ① ② ③ ④ ⑤ per quarter)
2) Gyeonggi local currency (note, card, mobile) is well ① ② ③ ④ ⑤ delivered·paid.
3) Fully understood the initiative behind payment in Gyeonggi local currency (revitalization of local ① ② ③ ④ ⑤ economy, resolving management difficulties of small businesses/entrepreneur etc.)
4) There is no inconvenience in using Gyeonggi local ① ② ③ ④ ⑤ currency.
[Q4] How satisfied are you in overall regarding the 'youth basic income' project of Gyeonggi Province in the 7th Local Election period?
Very satisfied Satisfied Average Not satisfied Not satisfied at all
① ② ③ ④ ⑤
→ Go to [Q5-1] → Go to [Q6] → Go to [Q5-2]
[Q5-1] What is the reason you are satisfied with the 'youth basic income' of Gyeonggi Province? Please select up to 3 in order.
(1st place: ), (2nd place: ), (3rd place: )
① Because it is paid to all youths aged 24 residing in Gyeonggi Province ② Because it is paid in Gyeonggi local currency which can be used like cash ③ Because it is paid directly to individual youth instead of householder ④ Because it is paid out quarterly over 4 times ⑤ Because there are no conditions for receiving youth basic income such as being employed or carrying out job seeking activities ⑥ Because online application method is convenient ⑦ Because it helped respondents to do things that they had difficulty doing previous such as leisure, employment, studies and others ⑧ Because the basic income amount is not reduced even if the youths have income through part-time jobs and others ⑨ Others ( )
200 Section 4. Appendix
[Q5-2] What is the reason you are dissatisfied with the 'youth basic income' of Gyeonggi Province? Please select up to 3 in order.
(1st place: ), (2nd place: ), (3rd place: )
① Because it is only paid to youths aged 24 out of the youth group ② Because there is a restriction in residence condition such as 3 years of residence regarding the recipient ③ Because Gyeonggi local currency can't be used in supermarkets, department stores, entertainment stores and others ④ Because the currency can't be used in the main area of activity in case the area where I am usually at, such as school and office differed from the city and County where I live in ⑤ Because it was paid out quarterly over 4 times and because applications had to be made each time ⑥ Because online application is inconvenient ⑦ Because the amount is not enough to help life ⑧ Because the local currency could be exchanged with cash through cousins or acquaintances which could damage the initiative of the local currency ⑨ Others ( )
[Q6] The next question is about the expansion of Gyeonggi Province's youth basic income project. Please respond accordingly regarding the following opinion.
Do not Fully Do not Agree Average agree agree agree at all
1) Youth basic income should not be restricted to the age ① ② ③ ④ ⑤ of 24 and the youth age group should be expanded
2) Payment of youth basic income should be implemented in other regions (cities and provinces) other than ① ② ③ ④ ⑤ Gyeonggi Province
3) Basic income such as youth basic income should be expanded and applied to specific groups such as ① ② ③ ④ ⑤ disabled, farmers and artists
[Q7] Have there been changes in life after receiving youth basic income?
Not so much Big change Quite some change Average No change at all change
① ② ③ ④ ⑤
→ Go to [Q8] → Go to [Q10] → Go to [Q9]
201 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Q8] If there were changes in life after receiving youth basic income, what were they? Please select 2 items only in order regarding changes in life.
(1st place: ), (2nd place: )
① Was able to attempt self-development ② Was able to travel or enjoy leisure ③ Was able to reduce financial burden when meeting friends and others ④ Was able to reduce time of labor done for the purpose of income ⑤ Was able to give money or gifts to people around ⑥ Was able to buy things that respondents had wanted to buy ⑦ Others ( )
[Q9] What are the items that need to be improved the most currently in the youth basic income project implemented by Gyeonggi Province? Please select 3 items only in order.
(1st place: ), (2nd place: ), (3rd place: )
① Payment amount has to be increased ② Payment subject must be extended without restricting to 24-year old youths ③ Application for payment has to be simplified ④ It has to be paid to foreign youths (age 24) residing in Gyeonggi Province ⑤ Areas where it can be used must be extended to areas other than the place of residence ⑥ The restriction in residence condition such as 3 years of residence has to be relieved ⑦ The problem of not being able to receive basic living subsidy in case the recipient of basic living subsidy is subject to youth basic income has to be resolved ⑧ Others ( )
[Q10] If you were to receive the youth basic income next year (2020), what do you think is the appropriate amount per quarter?
① Below KRW 100,000 ② KRW 100,000~below KRW 200,000 ③ KRW 200,000~below KRW 300,000 ④ KRW 300,000~below KRW 400,000 ⑤ KRW 400,000~below KRW 500,000 ⑥ Others (KRW )
[Q11] When did you learn when the youth basic income would be paid? Please answer based on the 1st quarter payment.
① End of 2018 (When the ordinance was enacted) ② Between January ~ April 2019 (preparation period) ③ April 2019 [1st registration period (Apr. 8~Apr. 30)] ④ May 2019 [2nd extension period (May 1~May 10)] ⑤ Others ( )
202 Section 4. Appendix
[Q12] How important do you think promotion is for creating awareness on youth basic income project?
Very important Quite important Average Not so important Not important at all
① ② ③ ④ ⑤
[Q13] How did you come to learn about the youth basic income project? Please respond to 2 items only in order. (1st place: ), (2nd place: )
① Mass media advertisements (TV, radio, newspaper, magazine etc.) ② Online advertisements (Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, Naver, Daum etc.) ③ Outdoor advertisements (G Bus TV, Video in apartment elevator, electronic board, banner in schools etc.) ④ TV news, radio news etc. ⑤ News articles (including online media) ⑥ TV program on living information (SBS Morning Wide, MBC This Morning etc.) ⑦ Through people around them such as friends, parents and teachers ⑧ Others ( )
[Q14] How did your level of interest in the following items change after receiving youth basic income? Please respond accordingly regarding the following items.
Mostly Not so Not at Item Very so Average so much all
1) Interest in human right expansion increased ① ② ③ ④ ⑤
2) Interest in economic freedom increased ① ② ③ ④ ⑤
3) Interest in resolving social inequality increased ① ② ③ ④ ⑤
[Q15] How did the awareness on the following items change arising from receipt of youth basic income? Please respond accordingly to the following items.
Mostly Not so Not at Item Very so Average so much all
1) Awareness on future dream changed positively ① ② ③ ④ ⑤
2) Attitude towards life changed positively ① ② ③ ④ ⑤
3) Awareness on the definition of family changed ① ② ③ ④ ⑤ positively
4) Awareness on the role of nation/local government ① ② ③ ④ ⑤ changed positively
203 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
III. Satisfaction related to the local currency in Gyeonggi Province
※ local currency refers to currency that is only used within Gyeonggi region with the initiative of contributing to the increased sales of small businesses/entrepreneurs, traditional markets/local businesses and revitalizing local economy.
[Q1] What is the type of the local currency that you have selected (or used) upon receipt of youth basic income? (Not applicable to local currency issued generally that is not part of the youth basic income payment. Please keep this in mind as you answer)
① Note (paper)-type (Q2-1) ② Card-type (Q2-2) ③ Mobile-type (Q2-3)
[Q2-1] What was the biggest inconvenience in using note (paper)-type of local currency?
① Storage and possession ② Finding the stores where it can be used ③ Restriction in business field and type of franchise stores ④ Registration of cash receipt ⑤ Unfriendly merchants arising from transaction of local currency ⑥ Others ( )
[Q2-2] What was the biggest inconvenience in using card-type of local currency?
① Storage and possession ② Finding the stores where it can be used ③ Restriction in business field and type of franchise stores ④ Inconvenient payment process ⑤ Unfriendly merchants arising from transaction of local currency ⑥ Others ( )
[Q2-3] What was the biggest inconvenience in using mobile-type (app. installation) of local currency?
① nconvenient app download and installation ② Finding the stores where it can be used ③ Restriction in business field and type of franchise stores ④ Inconvenient payment process (payment procedure and time taken) ⑤ Unfriendly merchants arising from transaction of local currency ⑥ Others ( )
204 Section 4. Appendix
[Q3] If you were to receive youth basic income in the future, what would be the most preferred type of local currency?
① Note (paper)-type ② Card-type ③ Mobile-type
[Q4] Gyeonggi local currency is being issued by 31 cities and counties within Gyeonggi Province and it can only be used within cities and counties. Are you aware of this?
① Aware ② Not aware
[Q5] In case Gyeonggi local currency settles down successfully, do you think it would help revitalize the local economy and increase sales of small businesses and others?
Very so Quite so Average Not so much Not at all
① ② ③ ④ ⑤
[Q6] The use of Gyeonggi local currency is prohibited in supermarkets, department stores, Super Supermarkets (SSM), entertainment and gambling stores and others. Are you aware of this?
① Aware ② Not aware
[Q7] Cash receipt and 30% income tax deduction can be received when using Gyeonggi local currency. Are you aware of this?
① Aware ② Not aware
[Q8] Card-type of Gyeonggi local currency can be used for payment in any franchise store. Are you aware of this?
① Aware ② Not aware
205 Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey Report on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
[Q9] What do you think needs to be improved the most in the future when using local currency?
① Promotion (posting of franchise stores in bulletin boards etc.) ② Education on usage method for consumers ③ Expansion and diversification of franchise stores ④ Education regarding franchise store merchants ⑤ Reinforcement of payment convenience ⑥ Expansion of usage area to desired regions within Gyeonggi Province other than the place of residence ⑦ Others ( )
[Q10] How did your level of interest in the following items change through receipt of youth basic income as local currency? Please respond accordingly to the following items.
Mostly Not so Not at Item Very so Average so much all
1) Interest in the revitalization of local economy increased (Local business, traditional market, ① ② ③ ④ ⑤ small business, entrepreneur etc.)
2) Interest in fostering local community ① ② ③ ④ ⑤ increased(Neighbor, neighborhood etc.)
206 Section 4. Appendix
IV. Respondent's characteristics
There are few more questions left for statistical classification.
[DQ1] What is your current identity status out of the following? Please answer based on the date you've received the youth basic income.
① Student (with part-time job) ② Student (without part-time job) ③ Unemployed (including leave of absence, job seekers, preparing for admission into school) ④ Soldier (including public service worker) ⑤ Employed (not a student) → [Go to DQ2] ⑥ Others
[Only for those who have selected ⑤ in DQ1] [DQ2] What kind of work do you currently do?
① Farming/forestry/fishery ② Self-employed ③ Sales/marketing/service sector ④ Production/technical post/labor ⑤ Office/technician ⑥ Management/managerial/specialist ⑦ Others
[DQ3] What is the total average household income?
① Below KRW 1 million ② KRW 1 million ~ below KRW 2 million ③ KRW 2 million ~ below KRW 3 million ④ KRW 3 million ~ below KRW 4 million ⑤ KRW 4 million ~ below KRW 5 million ⑥ KRW 5 million ~ below KRW 6 million ⑦ KRW 6 million ~ below KRW 7 million ⑧ KRW 7 million ~ below KRW 8 million ⑨ KRW 8 million ~ below KRW 9 million ⑩ KRW 9 million ~ below KRW10 million ⑪ Above KRW10 millio
[DQ4] What do you think your current standard of living is compared to other households?
① High ② Mid-high ③ Middle ④ Mid-low ⑤ Low
Thank you very much for taking part in the survey.
207 Authors Young Seong Yoo (Head of Basic Income Research Group, Gyeaonggi Research Institute) Wonho Jeong (Senior Research Fellow at Gyeonggi Research Institute) Byeongjo Kim (Research Fellow at Gyeonggi Research Institute) Jooyoung Ma (Researcher at Gyeonggi Research Institute)
Survey Jaehwan Jeong Advisor (Manager of Research Team at Gyeonggi Provincial Office)
Survey Research Rim Company
Q3 2019 Satisfaction Survey on Youth Basic Income in Gyeonggi Province
Printed in December, 2019 Published in December, 2019 Publisher Hanjoo Lee Published by Gyeonggi Research Institute Address (16207) 1150, Gyeongsu-daero, Jangdae-gu, Suwon City, Gyeonggi-do Telephone no. 031)250-3114 / Fax. 031)250-3111 Homepage www.gri.kr
Registration No. ⓒ Gyeonggi Research Institute, 2019
Gyeonggi Research Institute