Community Survey Results Living with World Heritage

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Community Survey Results Living with World Heritage Community survey results Living with World Heritage Background and Highlights 2002/2003 Understanding community and visitor attitudes Survey highlights The Wet Tropics World Heritage Area covers an area of 1. Support for the World Heritage Area is steadily 900,000 hectares from Townsville to Cooktown in north increasing. Queensland. About 350,000 people live within 50km of 1992 51% strong support 17% oppose the World Heritage boundary, and an additional two 2003 58% strong support 12.4% oppose million people visit the region each year. 2. There is strong recognition of the quality of life The Australian Government’s listing of the World benefits from the World Heritage Area. Heritage Area in 1988 was met with hostility from the Queensland Government and many regional The most important advantages related to general communities, which lost access to timber and other quality of life issues, rather than actual visits or forest resources. In 1992, the Wet Tropics Management economic benefits. Authority was formed to oversee management of the 3. Perceived disadvantages are declining. World Heritage Area. Less than 20% of respondents identified The Authority’s role is to set policy and coordinate disadvantages associated with living near the World management of the World Heritage Area. It does not Heritage Area. directly manage land. About 80% is managed by the 4. The community is concerned about on-ground Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service, while another management and consultation. 300 landholders manage the remaining 800 sq.km. One of the Authority’s goals is to foster community The community is not satisfied with the current understanding and support for the World Heritage standard of on-ground management. Feral pests and Area. In particular, it is charged with giving the World human activities are their greatest concerns. Heritage Area “a function in the life of the The majority of residents felt consultation and community”. communication between management agencies and In order to understand and assess community the community could be improved. attitudes, the Authority commissioned community surveys in 1992, 1993 and 1996 (AGB McNair). Issues for managers Neighbouring landholders were surveyed in 1999 (AC The surveys also highlighted the following issues that Nielsen). From 2001 to 2003, the Authority expanded require greater focus from the Authority and the land these studies to ensure community views would feed management agencies: into management of the World Heritage Area. The L The majority of residents believed they were latest research was undertaken by Dr Joan knowledgeable about the World Heritage Area, Bentrupperbäumer and Dr Joseph Reser from the but many are unaware of its boundaries and how Rainforest CRC and James Cook University. Their it is managed. findings are based on two surveys: L The differing roles of the Authority and other land L A visitor survey of over 2,500 visitors at 10 key management agencies is poorly understood. visitor sites in 2001 and 2002. L The community gave a mixed response to the L A community survey of 788 residents living in 70 issue of Aboriginal co-management of the World regional towns and suburbs in 2002 and 2003. Heritage Area. While 58% of residents were supportive, 42% were opposed. 2 Living with World Heritage Awareness and Support The community is very Why were the rainforests made a World Heritage Area? aware of the existence of the World Heritage Protection/conservation 46 Natural/geological 26 Area and strongly Preservation 15 Political 7 supports its Aesthetic 3 Community well being 2 protection. Residents Business opportunities 0.5 Indigenous/cultural 0.5 view the World 0 20 40 60 80 100 Percentage of responses Heritage Area as an integral part of their Further findings landscape, lifestyle L 93% of residents are aware that most of the rainforests in this region of north Queensland are part of a World Heritage Area. and community. L Over 82% indicated they are slightly / moderately knowledgeable about the World Heritage Area. Responses suggest a strong sense of I Importance of the World Heritage Area collective ownership and responsibility. Very important 54 Considerably important 23 Moderately important 10 Somewhat important 9 Slightly important 2 Not important 2 0 20 40 60 80 100 Percentage of responses Further findings L Participants from the southern Wet Tropics region (Cardwell to Townsville) felt the World Heritage Area was less important than northern participants. L There are regional differences in community attitudes. eg. Residents from the southern I Support for World Heritage listing Wet Tropics region (Cardwell to Townsville) recorded the lowest support for World Heritage listing. Strongly support 58 L Moderately support 20 There are age and gender Slightly support 10 differences. eg. The 12% of Slightly oppose 5 residents who still oppose Moderately oppose 2 the World Heritage Area are Strongly oppose 5 likely to be 50 to 60 year-old males who have lived in the 0 20 40 60 80 100 region for over 30 years and Percentage of responses live in rural or rural residential areas. 3 Living with World Heritage Advantages & Disadvantages Personal advantages Further findings Good to know it’s there, that it exists L The two most important personal advantages A quality living environment were related to quality of life, rather than Rest & Relax actual visits or use. Recreational opportunities Social opportunities L 75% felt these benefits were considerably/ Indirect economic opportunities very important. Direct economic opportunities L The two lowest rated personal advantages 123456 were indirect economic opportunities (eg. food Not Important Important outlets, accommodation) and direct economic opportunities (eg. tour operator, ranger). Community advantages Further findings Clean air & water L The most important community advantages Plant & animal protection relate to environmental protection and Scenic landscape protection associated benefits of the World Environmental awareness & knowledge Heritage Area. Economic opportunities L Once again, economic benefits were seen 123456 as less important, but nevertheless they Not Important Important were still rated moderately/considerably important. Over 80% felt there were no disadvantages. For the remainder the disadvantages were: 25 Further findings Rules, regulations, restrictions 17 L The main disadvantage in Political issues 5 Personal disadvantages 7 Community disadvantages 5 1996 was the loss of jobs Management issues 8 and damage to local 7 Infrastructure issues 3 economies (36%). 2 Industry, agriculture issues 17 23 Feral plants & animals, pests 12 11 “A wonderful Environmental issues 1 8 connection with Economic / employment issues 21 14 Community issues 14 nature, flora and 01020304050 fauna, sight Percentage of responses and sound.” 4 Living with World Heritage Threats I What are the three most serious threats to the World Heritage Area? Feral animals & plants, pests 31 Human activity within the WTWHA 28 Human activity outside the WTWHA 22 Management issues 7 Political issues 6 Other 4 Natural hazards / disasters 2 01020304050 Percentage of responses Further findings L The most frequently reported environmental threat was “feral animals and plants” followed by “human activity within the World Heritage Area”. L Over 50% of responses related to human activities. L The community perception is that the majority of threats are only being addressed to a slight extent. I What do you expect from the agencies responsible for World Heritage management? Protection / Conservation / Preservation 31 There is strong Maintenance / Care / Upkeep 16 Accountable / Effective management 15 concern for the well Education / Public relations / Promotion 12 Regulatory 7 being of the World Access 5 Resource management 4 Heritage Area. Infrastructure 4 Informed / Knowledgeable 2 Human impacts of Strategic management 2 Balanced management 1 development, rural 01020304050 Percentage of responses industries and feral species are matters of serious concern. I Are World Heritage attributes being adequately protected or managed? 100% 80% Further findings L Very few respondents believe World 60% Heritage attributes are being fully 40% protected or managed. L 20% Considerable or full extent Feral animals and weeds were Slight or moderate extent perceived to be the least well managed. 0% Not at all or very little Protecting Protecting Protecting Managing Controlling L The community is not satisfied with biodiversity scenic wetlands and feral animals weeds the current standard of on-ground landscapes waterways management. 5 Living with World Heritage Visits by residents When did you last visit the World Heritage Area? In the last 6 months 66 7 to 12 months 19 1 to 2 years 5 2 to 5 years 3 More than 5 years 7 020406080100 Percentage of responses How often do you visit? Every day 12 Every week 12 Every month 26 Every three months 50 020406080100 Percentage of responses “To chill out, cool down and Further findings be surrounded L 85% have visited the World Heritage Area. by nature” L More than 65% visited within the past six months. L 50% of the local community visit 1-4 times per year. Who are the visitors? L There are estimated to be 4.65 million visits each year to 100 of the World Heritage Area’s visitor sites. Many are repeat visits by local residents. L Regional residents were the main visitors making up 40% of the total numbers at most visitor sites. L The average visitor age was 36 years. Overseas visitors are significantly younger than local and domestic visitors. L The majority of visitors are travelling as families or small groups. L The busiest months are October, January and from May to a peak in August. Domestic Visitors 26% Residents 40% International Visitors 34% 6 Living with World Heritage Visits by residents I What was the main reason for your visit? Activity 56 Experience 36 Other 6 Educational 2 0 20 40 60 80 100 Percentage of responses L Activity: Recreation, sightseeing, camping, bush walking, swimming. L Experience: To have a break, rest and relax, admire, appreciate, enjoy the environment, to experience tranquillity.
Recommended publications
  • The Great Tropical Drive
    Great Tropical Drive 01 Cairns – Port Douglas – Cooktown – Charters Towers – Townsville – Cairns (2079km) COOKTOWN The Great Tropical Drive is a world class touring loop that travels roads less travelled from the Great Barrier Reef through the rainforests of the Wet Tropics Laura into the golden savannah of Outback Queensland. Great Green Way 04 Helenvale 02 the savannah way driving cape york Townsville – Cairns (457km) Rossville The ultimate adventure across the top This traditional adventure driving destination is best visited by 4WD but during August and Starting from Townsville or Cairns, the Great Green Way encompasses the of Australia. From Queensland head out September conventional vehicles can make the 700km drive from Lakeland near Cooktown. World Heritage-listed Wet Tropics Rainforest and Great Barrier Reef, islands, Lakeland Ayton waterfalls, wetlands, farming areas and friendly country towns. It’s the perfect The Great Tropical Drive is a self-drive route that of Cairns to the lush landscapes of the During the drive to the “tip”, check out the Aboriginal rock art at Laura, on odd numbered drive to experience coastal North Queensland. Wujal Wujal will take you from Cairns or Townsville to some Atherton Tablelands and on to the wide years the Aboriginal Dance and Cultural Festival, as well as Lakefi eld National Park, the Palmer River amazing places – less than a few hours away! Daintree Explorer Cape Tribulation expanses of the Gulf Savannah. Some of mining town of Weipa, and Bamaga township. the great tropical drive Roadhouse DISCOVER NATURE'S PLAYGROUND 03 Mossman – Bloomfi eld Track – Cooktown – Mossman (417km) Dive the Great Barrier Reef, raft whitewater the route is 4WD only, but large sections For more information visit www.cooktownandcapeyork.com Explore the rugged landscape beyond the Daintree coast.
    [Show full text]
  • Mobile Coverage Report Organisation of Councils
    Far North Queensland Regional Mobile Coverage Report Organisation of Councils Far North Queensland Regional Organisation of Councils Mobile Coverage Report 4 August 2019 Strategy, Planning & Development Implementation Programs Research, Analysis & Measurement Independent Broadband Testing Digital Mapping Far North Queensland Regional Mobile Coverage Report Organisation of Councils Document History Version Description Author Date V1.0 Mobile Coverage Report Michael Whereat 29 July 2019 V2.0 Mobile Coverage Report – Michael Whereat 4 August 2019 updated to include text results and recommendations V.2.1 Amendments to remove Palm Michael Whereat 15 August 2019 Island reference Distribution List Person Title Darlene Irvine Executive Officer, FNQROC Disclaimer: Information in this document is based on available data at the time of writing this document. Digital Economy Group Consulting Pty Ltd or its officers accept no responsibility for any loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from acting in reliance upon any material contained in this document. Copyright © Digital Economy Group 2011-19. This document is copyright and must be used except as permitted below or under the Copyright Act 1968. You may reproduce and publish this document in whole or in part for you and your organisation’s own personal and internal compliance, educational or non-commercial purposes. You must not reproduce or publish this document for commercial gain without the prior written consent of the Digital Economy Group Consulting Pty. Ltd. Far North Queensland Regional Mobile Coverage Report Organisation of Councils Executive Summary For Far North QLD Regional Organisation of Councils (FNQROC) the challenge of growing the economy through traditional infrastructure is now being exacerbated by the need to also facilitate the delivery of digital infrastructure to meet the expectations of industry, residents, community and visitors or risk being left on the wrong side of the digital divide.
    [Show full text]
  • Herberton's Historic 4WD Mining Trails
    Chillagoe Atherton Almaden Wadetown Stannary ! Petford ! Hills !Lappa !21 Bakerville Watsonville Herberton !11 ! ! !10 !16 !14 !13 !9 !22 Gibbs Creek !12 S 15 23 a ! Irvinebank 1 17 ! n ! ! d 2 y ! !3! C Khartoum re Batcha e k !37 Lancelot Emuford !4 !24 !36 Newellton S pini fex Creek !5 u Em Cre ek !6 Dry River Tat !25 e R ive Gilmore r !26 !35 Fingertown !7 Califo 27 r k ! n 8 ia e 34 ! Cre ! Coolgarra ek !33 Ravenshoe Cre ell ! b 28 p ! m a C 32 29 ! !!30 !31 Innot Hot Tabo Mount !Springs Village !Garnet 18 !Gingerella !19 !20 HERBERTON'S HISTORIC MINING TRAILS - 4WD * Some creek crossings may be impassable during the wet season - IF IT'S FLOODED, FORGET IT. * Mining landscapes can contain hidden hazards. Please stay on the designated roads. * The 4WD mining trails all use gazetted (public) roads, but may be unfenced. Please respect the rights of adjacent property owners. * Mobile coverage is unreliable in this area. Please consider using UHF radio for emergency communications and advise friends and family of proposed route and expected return time. * Abandoned town and settlement sites are marked on this map as approximate areas only. Look out for clearings, house stumps, introduced plant species (mango trees, bouganvillea, date palms etc). Silver Valley Road 12 Great Dividing Range 26 Abdul Wade’s Camel Track Directions assume travelling south from Herberton Very steep climb from here to next peak (70m Abdul Wade, an Afghani camel trader, and his 1 Road forks – take right road in 500m) 500 camels made a flat line track across the 2 Small track to right leads to a small dam.
    [Show full text]
  • Miners Right February 2017
    THE MINER’S RIGHT The North Queensland Miner’s Association Incorporated Representing Miners, Prospectors and Associated Industries February 2017 PRESIDENT : PRESIDENTS REPORT – Fiona Abbey Fiona Abbey Ph: 0418 787 215 Welcome to 2017! We must apologise for getting out this Miners Right a bit later than what is the usual. 2017 has started off as a cracker and time to fill in these VICE-PRESIDENT: roles has to compete with everything else. We will be back on track for the May one. James Said Ph: 0427 569 848 We have a few matters that are on the table that continue from 2016 and beyond, NATIVE TITLE which includes the Emergency Fire Levy. Unfortunately this topic is one that we OFFICER: are fighting the hardest at the moment to get a resolution, however in the space of 12 months this portfolio has had THREE new Ministers and with each new Paul Crossland Minister the Department seems to make us start all over again. We aren’t letting Ph: 40953324 this issue drop with Claire and Vicky constantly on the case. SECRETARY: With the shuffle of some of the board of NQMA and others taking a well-earned Vicky Lake break from many many years of service to the Association, we will have a few gaps Ph: 0405 112 154 in our volunteers for the 2017 Gold Panning Event. The most important being Frank’s Sausage Sizzle which gives us sustenance during the day. If anyone would TREASURER: like to take on this task (with possible naming rights up for grabs) please let myself or Claire know and we can pass on details.
    [Show full text]
  • Kennedy Y D E N N E K
    KENNEDY KENNEDY Kowanyama Lakefield ! Hope Vale r Cooktown SOURCES Edward River e ! 2009 A iv li R ce Dixie Laura This map has been compiled by Terranean Mapping Technologies from data supplied COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA by the Australian Electoral Commission, Geoscience Australia and Pitney Bowes KOWANYAMA Business Insight 2009 (www.pbinsight.com.au). StreetPro Australia is used on this Æ Ä map, based on data provided under licence from PSMA Australia Ltd. 40 Rossville Indian Ocean SHIRE DISCLAIMER LEICHHARDT COOK SHIRE This map has been compiled from various sources and the publisher and/or contributors accept no responsibility for any injury, loss or damage arising from its use, or errors or Na Maramie omissions therein. While all care is taken to ensure a high degree of accuracy, users are ssau C River O invited to notify of any map discrepancies. Teatree S O er Palmer Degarra H K alm R Creek IR P iv E er © Pitney Bowes Software Pty Ltd, 2009. PARISH OF COBHAM Bloomfield Wujal o Cape Tribulation © Commonwealth of Australia 2009 16 S Lakeland Wujal Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 o Dagmar This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, 16 S Thornton Beach no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the STATE OF QUEENSLAND Spurgeon Diwan Commonwealth. Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and rights should D McLeod A Mount Daintree be addressed to the Commonwealth Copyright Administration, Attorney General’s O River R Highbury Mulgrave Department, National Circuit, Barton ACT 2600 or posted at www.ag.gov.au/cca.
    [Show full text]
  • Mining in North Queensland: Some Historical Background Jan Wegner, James Cook University
    Mining in North Queensland: some historical background Jan Wegner, James Cook University MinErAL Meeting Cairns 2019 North Queensland? ▪ Hinterlands of Cairns and Townsville ▪ Cape York ▪ Gulf Country ▪ One of the world’s great mineral provinces ▪ 19th and early 20th centuries: Gold, copper, tin, lead, silver, coal, wolfram, scheelite, bismuth, manganese, mica, zinc, graphite, limestone, molybdenum, sapphires, opal Qld Government Mining Journal 1908 ▪ 20th and 21st centuries ▪ Add: ▪ Uranium, nickel, perlite, bauxite, kaolin, silica sand, slate, marble European mining history ▪ European occupation of North Queensland begins with pastoralism, late 1850s ▪ Sheep first but soon found unsuited to the tropics ▪ Change to cattle – but had a limited market ▪ So graziers and business people in their ports created a market: goldfields ▪ Geologist Richard Daintree, partner William Hann, and Aboriginal prospector Jerry begin Cape River, Gilbert River and (indirectly) Palmer goldfields 1867-1873 ▪ Miners spread out and discovered more goldfields 1880s – 1910s ▪ Tin, copper, silver mining established in the same period Daintree’s prospecting party on the Gilbert First copper mines in NQ: Daintree’s Einasleigh Mine 1866, Ernest Henry’s Great Australia 1867 Both images early 20th century ▪ Part of the anti-clockwise movement of gold discoveries around Australia (with some back- tracking) Gold ▪ Began Star River (Townsville) 1865 ▪ Major discoveries: Cape River 1867, Gilbert River 1868, Ravenswood 1868, Etheridge 1870, Charters Towers 1872, Palmer River
    [Show full text]
  • Tablelands Agricultural Profile 2010/2011
    Tablelands agricultural profile 2010/2011 Tablelands region Average Annual Temperature Range Elevation Locality rainfall (°C) The Tablelands agricultural production area, defined (m) (mm) by the boundaries of the Tablelands Regional Council January July (TRC) local government area in far north Mareeba 400 918 21-31 11-25 Queensland, covers an area of 65,000km². Most agricultural activity within the TRC occurs on the Dimbulah 407 783 22-34 11-27 elevated, eastern highlands (6,000km²) from Julatten Atherton 752 1420 18-29 10-22 in the north, to Dimbulah in the west and to Malanda 738 1565 17-28 5-22 Ravenshoe in the south. Population within the TRC area is 47 000; concentrated in the major centres of Ravenshoe 930 842 16-31 3-23 Atherton, Herberton, Kuranda, Malanda, Mareeba Soils and Ravenshoe, and the smaller centres of Chillagoe, Dimbulah, Irvinebank, Julatten, Millaa Soil types vary markedly across the Tablelands. A Millaa, Mt Garnet, Mt Molloy, Mutchilba, Tolga, typical agricultural soil in the Mareeba/Dimbulah area is Walkamin and Yungaburra. derived from granite and has inherent low fertility. Soil profiles for these soils often comprise a sandy Industry diversity loam/sandy clay loam over a red, structured, coarse sandy clay soil with a slightly acid pH. Soils in the Tablelands agriculture includes a large diversity of Atherton area are often derived from basalt, are well plant and animal industries and production of both drained and have high fertility. Soil profiles for tropical and subtropical crops. 39 large agricultural these soils usually comprise a red, structured, high industries were identified in the Tablelands region in clay soil with an acid-neutral pH.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gulf Savannah Is a Far Medical Centres at Georgetown, Forsayth, Normally in Force from October to February
    Head Office: Department of Natural Resources and Water Cnr Main & Vulture Sts, Woolloongabba, Brisbane Locked Bag 40, Coorparoo Delivery Centre, Qld. 4151 Ph (07) 3896 3216, Fax (07) 3896 3510 For all your regional and recreational map needs, Sunmap products are available from Departmental service centres, distributors and selected retailers throughout Queensland or the Queensland Government Bookshop at: www.publications.qld.gov.au. The development of aviation and the inspiration of John Flynn To view the complete range of products and services, visit our home combined after World War I to include the remote Gulf frontier in page at: www.nrw.qld.gov.au. the network of Flying Doctor Services which made up the ‘mantle of safety’ for the inland areas of Australia. The Etheridge Goldfield, the ‘poor man’s goldfield’ has never been worked out. Discovered by Richard Daintree in 1869, the Etheridge survived the rushes to the Palmer Over the bush ‘roads’ rolled the legendary and other richer fields in North Queensland. The ghosts Founded in 1865 by commercial and pastoral interests led by The traditional industries of the Gulf The Normanton to Croydon Railway is a living relic of the age of steam railways. Originally coaches of Cobb and Co. and other lines, of such towns as Charleston on the Etheridge and Robert Towns, Burketown in its early days was a wild frontier Savannah are fishing and grazing, with intended to link the port of Normanton to the copper mines of Cloncurry, the discovery of gold carrying mail and passengers between Gilberton on the Gilbert Field still dot the Savannah and Weipa town, the refuge of law breakers and adventurers, a town which beef cattle succeeding sheep, which were around Croydon led to its diversion to that Goldfield in 1891.
    [Show full text]
  • Approved Conservation Advice for Macropteranthes Montana
    This Conservation Advice was approved by the Minister / Delegate of the Minister on: 16/12/2008 Approved Conservation Advice (s266B of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999) Approved Conservation Advice for Macropteranthes montana This Conservation Advice has been developed based on the best available information at the time this Conservation Advice was approved; this includes existing plans, records or management prescriptions for this species. Description Macropteranthes montana, Family Combretaceae, is a shrub to 6 m with widely spreading branches. Leaves are spirally arranged on the stems, usually densely crowded, lance-shaped to rectangular, the apex obtuse with a small point, the base gradually tapering to a stalk less than 1.5 mm long. The leaf blade is 5–8 mm long, 1–2.5 mm wide, with a dense covering of soft, silvery hairs. Inflorescences are of paired flowers on stalks to 1 mm long. The calyx is 1– 1.5 cm long, tubular, bearing two bracteoles (leaf-like structures). Petals are 6–8 mm long. Both the calyx and petals are covered in long, weak hairs. The fruit is dry, initially red, bleaching straw yellow, terminating in enlarged calyx lobes 2.2–2.5 cm long, the bracteoles enlarged, wing-like, 1–2 cm long (Pedley, 1990). Flowering has been recorded from November to June (BRI collection records, n.d.). Conservation Status Macropteranthes montana is listed as vulnerable. This species is eligible for listing as vulnerable under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cwlth) (EPBC Act) as, prior to the commencement of the EPBC Act, it was listed as vulnerable under Schedule 1 of the Endangered Species Protection Act 1992 (Cwlth).
    [Show full text]
  • Mareeba Shire Handbook
    MAREEBA SHIRE HANDBOOK An Inventory of the Agricultural Resources and Production of Mareeba Shire, Queensland Queensland Department of Primary Industries September 1978 MAREEBA SHIRE HANDBOOK An Inventory of the Agricultural Resources and Production of Mareeba Shire, Queensland Compiled by: N. T. Currie, District Adviser, Mareeba Edited by: P. L. Lloyd, Extension Officer, Brisbane Published by: Queensland Department of Primary Industries September 1978 FOREWORD The Shire Handbook was conceived in the mid-1960s. A limited number of a series was printed for use by officers of the Department of Primary Industries to assist them in their planning of research and extension programmes. The Handbooks created wide interest and, in response to public demand, it was decided to publish progressively a new updated series. This volume is one of the new series. Shire Handbooks review, in some detail, the environmental and natural resources which affect farm production and people in the particular Shire. Climate, geology, topography, water resources, soils and vegetation are' described. Farming systems are discussed, animal and crop production reviewed and yields and turnoff quantified. The economics of component industries are studied. The text is supported liberally by maps and statistical tables. Shire Handbooks provide important reference material for all concerned with rural industries and rural Queensland. * They serve as a guide to farmers and graziers, bankers, stock and station agents and those in agricultural business. * Provide essential information for regional planners, developers and environmental impact students. * Are a very useful reference for teachers at all levels of education and deserve a place in most libraries. I commend this series to students of agriculture and all whose business is associated with the land and rural people.
    [Show full text]
  • "GOD BLESS JOHN MOFFAT" by Ruth Kerr, B.A., Dip.Lib.Sc, J.P
    Irvinebank, Mining Community and Centre of an Empire "GOD BLESS JOHN MOFFAT" by Ruth Kerr, B.A., Dip.Lib.Sc, J.P. Read to a Meeting of the Royal Historical Society of Queensland, 24 May, 1984. (All Rights Reserved) This paper concentrates on the relationship of a mining magnate to the town of Irvinebank and the growth of its cultural and social activities in tandem with his monopolistic control of the chief mines, the Vulcan, Great Southem, Tornado and Govemor Norman as well as the region north to Cooktown and west to Chillagoe. The year 1984 is the centenary of the opening of the Loudoun Mill at Irvinebank, twenty-four kilometres beyond Herberton, west of Caims, North Queensland. On Queensland Separation Day 1884 the battery and smelter were christened the Loudoun Mill by Janet Jack, daughter of William Jack, one of the discoverers of the Great Northem Mine at Herberton and partner of Moffat in that mine. A crowd of 150 sat down to lunch in the garden of John Moffat's Loudoun House followed by an aftemoon of sports. The Glen Smelting Company, a New South Wales private company of which John Moffat was the North Queensland manager, owned the Mill. It was acclaimed the most complete processing plant in Queensland and became the headquarters of a mining magnate whose career spanned and sponsored the development of the base metal industry in Eastem Australia. He also ventured into oil exploration and sugar technology and financed and constructed towns, dams, tramways and railways. For decades, Irvinebank, site of the largest tin battery and smelter in Australia, was reached by a narrow gauge tramway which branched off the Chillagoe Railway at Boonmoo.
    [Show full text]
  • The Emuford Battery, North Queensland: a Study in Survival
    Journal of Australasian Mining History, Vol. 4, September 2006 The Emuford Battery, North Queensland: a study in survival By JAN WEGNER and JUSTIN LAMBERT James Cook University he Emuford Battery crushed tin ore in the hinterland of Cairns, far north Queensland, between 1911 and 1985. It remains virtually intact, and is a Tmuseum of late nineteenth century and early twentieth century milling technology. Historic mill sites with such a high degree of intactness are uncommon, as most have been reduced to a few scraps of rusting metal. Discussed in this paper is the history of the mill, its physical characteristics and the ways in which the plant was modified over time and suggestions as to its remarkable state of preservation. Of these, the most important were: ownership by members of one family for much of its existence; the willingness of the State government to preserve it during periods when tin mining was not viable; and the poverty of the district that made modernisation of the plant too expensive. Finally, the heritage movement of recent years that has led to greater public recognition of mining heritage and conservation has ensured the battery’s survival following the demise of tin mining in the district in 1985. The Emuford Mill retains all of its plant. It has two generations of engines, one gas and one diesel, the charcoal retort for the suction gas engine, ore bins, rock breaker, stamps, classifiers, shaking tables, grinding pan, vanners, tin dryer, tool shop, tin weighing room, spare parts, forge, pumps, and the infrastructure to support them: dam, mill building, and domestic housing.
    [Show full text]