DOCSLIB.ORG

Analysis of Alternatives & Socio-Economic

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Analysis of Alternatives & Socio-Economic ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES & SOCIO-ECONOMIC ANALYSIS Public version Legal name of Applicant: Nexter Mechanics Submitted by: Nexter Mechanics Substance: Chromium trioxide, EC 215-607-8 and CAS 1333-82-0 Use title: Use-1 Industrial use of a mixture of chromium trioxide for the hard chromium plating of military armament steels parts which are thermomechanically stressed and in contact with oxidizing gas at high temperature, so as to ensure a thermal barrier with high melting point, resistance to wear and oxidation associated with weapons as well as resistance to impact and atmospheric corrosion. Use number: 1 Analysis of Alternatives – Socio-Economic Analysis CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS .......................................................................................................... 6 1. SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... 7 2. AIMS AND SCOPE OF THE ANALYSIS .................................................................................. 9 2.1. Equipments concerned and applications .......................................................................... 13 2.1.1. CAESAR ................................................................................................................................... 14 2.1.2. RAFALE .................................................................................................................................... 16 2.1.3. JAGUAR and the CT40 gun ...................................................................................................... 17 2.2. Elements of context........................................................................................................... 20 2.2.1. Focus: Maintenance in Operational Conditions (MOC) .......................................................... 21 2.3. General methodology ........................................................................................................ 22 2.3.1. Scope of the AfA ..................................................................................................................... 23 2.3.2. An argument partly based on representative examples for the French army ........................ 24 2.3.3. Actualisation ........................................................................................................................... 25 2.3.4. Confidentiality ........................................................................................................................ 26 2.4. Substitution strategy ......................................................................................................... 27 2.5. Definitions of the “applied for use” and “non-use” scenarios .......................................... 27 2.5.1. “Applied for use” scenario ...................................................................................................... 27 2.5.2. “Non-use” scenario ................................................................................................................. 27 3. “APPLIED FOR USE” SCENARIO ....................................................................................... 29 3.1. Analysis of substance function .......................................................................................... 29 3.2. Market and business trends including the use of the substance ...................................... 30 3.2.1. Annual tonnage ...................................................................................................................... 33 3.3. Remaining risks of the “applied for use” scenario ............................................................ 33 3.4. Human health impacts and monetised damage of the “applied for use” scenario .......... 33 3.4.1. Medical treatment .................................................................................................................. 34 3.4.2. Mortality and morbidity ......................................................................................................... 37 3.4.3. Synthesis of the monetised damage of the “applied for use” scenario .................................. 42 3.4.4. Complementary elements of analysis: values taking into account a 4% discount rate .......... 43 3.5. Environment and man-via-environment impacts and monetised damage of the “applied for use” scenario .......................................................................................................................... 43 3.5.1. Environment impacts and monetised damage ....................................................................... 43 3.5.2. Man-via-environment impacts and monetised damage ........................................................ 43 3.6. General conclusion on the impacts and monetised damage of the “applied for use” scenario ........................................................................................................................................ 43 4. SELECTION OF THE “NON-USE” SCENARIO ....................................................................... 44 4.1. Efforts made to identify alternatives ................................................................................ 44 4.1.1. Research and development .................................................................................................... 44 4.1.2. Data searches ......................................................................................................................... 44 4.2. Identification of known alternatives ................................................................................. 45 4.2.1. Potential alternatives already abandoned ............................................................................. 45 4.2.2. Other publicly available potential alternative process ........................................................... 46 4.2.3. Consortium as the only remaining alternative for Use-1 ........................................................ 46 4.3. Assessment of shortlisted alternatives ............................................................................. 46 4.3.1. Alternative 1 ........................................................................................................................... 47 Use-1 Nexter Mechanics 2 Analysis of Alternatives – Socio-Economic Analysis 4.3.2. The most likely “non-use” scenario ........................................................................................ 51 5. IMPACTS OF GRANTING AN AUTHORISATION ................................................................. 56 5.1. Economic impacts .............................................................................................................. 57 5.1.1. Loss of revenues, profits and orders ....................................................................................... 57 5.1.2. Lost investments ..................................................................................................................... 59 5.1.3. Contractual penalties ............................................................................................................. 60 5.2. Human health or Environmental impact ........................................................................... 61 5.3. Social impacts .................................................................................................................... 61 5.3.1. Impact on employment........................................................................................................... 61 5.3.2. Territory vulnerability ............................................................................................................. 66 5.3.3. Indirect employment .............................................................................................................. 67 5.4. Wider economic impacts ................................................................................................... 68 5.5. Distributional impacts ....................................................................................................... 68 5.5.1. Impact on operational availability of armament systems ...................................................... 70 5.5.2. Loss of investments for the French State ................................................................................ 74 5.5.3. Impact on France’s sovereignty .............................................................................................. 75 5.5.4. Impact on Nexter’s industrial partners ................................................................................... 76 5.6. Uncertainty analysis for both the “applied for use” and the “non-use” scenario ............ 77 5.6.1. “Applied for use” scenario ...................................................................................................... 77 5.6.2. “Non-use” scenario ................................................................................................................. 78 5.6.3. Synthesis ................................................................................................................................. 81 5.6.4. Conclusion............................................................................................................................... 83 5.7. General conclusion on the impacts of granting an authorisation ..................................... 83 6. CONCLUSIONS................................................................................................................ 85 6.1. Comparison of the benefits and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Completes a Decisive Step Towards Further Integration Amsterdam, 14Th
    KNDS (Amsterdam/The Netherlands) completes a decisive step towards further integration Amsterdam, 14th December 2020 Five years after the merger of Krauss-Maffei Wegmann (Munich, Germany) and Nexter Systems (Versailles, France) under the joint holding KNDS, the Group’s governance is being restructured. With this new structure, the owners of the Franco- German manufacturer of military land systems – the French state holding company GIAT Industries and the German family-owned company Wegmann & Co GmbH – are continuing on the path they forged in 2015: advancing in defined milestones towards the creation of a leader in its field. The shareholders have decided to streamline the governance structure by establishing a single board of directors replacing the existing supervisory and management boards. After a first phase where the two subsidiaries got to know each other under the management of two co-CEOS and started building the company, it is time now to enter into the next phase of integration and development. The new structure will enable more efficient and coherent management of the KNDS companies and optimum leveraging of their potential and synergies. The future board of directors of KNDS will comprise ten members. Nine members will be external appointees without any direct operational responsibilities within KNDS. The tenth member will be the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of KNDS. Unanimously, the shareholders have appointed Frank Haun to assume this role. Frank Haun has served as CEO of Krauss-Maffei Wegmann since 2003. He played a crucial role in designing and building KNDS in 2015 and has been instrumental in the success of the company since 2015 as Co-CEO.
    [Show full text]
  • Tm 9-3305 Technical Manual Principles of Artillery Weapons Headquarters
    Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com TM 9-3305 TECHNICAL MANUAL PRINCIPLES OF ARTILLERY WEAPONS HEADQUARTERS, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY 4 MAY 1981 Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com *TM 9-3305 Technical Manual HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY No. 9-3305 Washington, DC, 4 May 1981 PRINCIPLES OF ARTILLERY WEAPONS REPORTING ERRORS AND RECOMMENDING IMPROVEMENTS You can help improve this manual. If you find any mistakes or if you know of a way to improve the procedures, please let us know. Mail your letter, DA Form 2028 (Recommended Changes to Publications and Blank Forms), or DA Form 2028-2, located in the back of this manual, direct to: Commander, US Army Armament Materiel Readiness Command, ATTN: DRSAR-MAS, Rock Island, IL 61299. A reply will be furnished to you. Para Page PART ONE. GENERAL CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................ 1-1 1-1 2. HISTORY OF DEVELOPMENT Section I. General ....................................................................................................................... 2-1 2-1 II. Development of United States Cannon Artillery......................................................... 2-8 2-5 III. Development of Rockets and Guided Missiles ......................................................... 2-11 2-21 CHAPTER 3. CLASSIFICATION OF CURRENT FIELD ARTILLERY WEAPONS Section I. General ....................................................................................................................... 3-1 3-1
    [Show full text]
  • Véhicules Blindés Européens : Les Programmes En Cours
    DOCUMENT A/2034 3 juin 2009 CINQUANTE-SIXIÈME SESSION ________ Véhicules blindés européens : les programmes en cours RAPPORT présenté au nom de la Commission technique et aérospatiale par M. Axel Fischer, président et rapporteur (Allemagne, Groupe fédéré) et Mme Tuija Nurmi (Finlande, Groupe fédéré), rapporteure DOCUMENT A/2034 3 juin 2009 CINQUANTE-SIXIÈME SESSION ________ Véhicules blindés européens : les programmes en cours RAPPORT présenté au nom de la Commission technique et aérospatiale par M. Axel Fischer, président et rapporteur (Allemagne, Groupe fédéré) et Mme Tuija Nurmi (Finlande, Groupe fédéré), rapporteure Rapport transmis au Président du Conseil de l’UEO ; au Président du Conseil de l’Union européenne ; au Secrétaire général de l’UEO/Haut Représentant pour la PESC de l’Union européenne ; au Président de la Commission européenne ; au Commissaire pour les stratégies de communication de l’UE ; aux Présidents des parlements nationaux et aux Présidents des Commissions des affaires étrangères, de la défense et des affaires européennes des 39 pays représentés au sein de l’Assemblée ; aux Présidents des Assemblées parlementaires du Conseil de l’Europe, de l’OSCE, de l’OTAN, de l’Assemblée balte, du Conseil nordique, de l’Assemblée parlementaire pour la coopération économique de la mer Noire, de l’Assemblée parlementaire de la CEI ; au Président du Parlement européen, ainsi qu’aux Secrétaires généraux des Assemblées parlementaires du Conseil de l’Europe, de l’OSCE et de l’OTAN. Document A/2034 3 juin 2009 Véhicules blindés européens : les programmes en cours ______ RAPPORT1 présenté au nom de la Commission technique et aérospatiale par M.
    [Show full text]
  • FEBRUARY/MARCH 2017. Issue 01
    FEBRUARY/MARCH 2017. Issue 01. READY FOR WHEREVER YOUR MISSION TAKES YOU ELAMS TOC: The ELAMS TOC Primary mission is to provide effective, reliable space for execution of battlefield C4I. MECC® Shower/Latrine: The AAR MECC® is a fully customizable ISO that allows you to mobilize your mission. SPACEMAX® The SPACEMAX® shelter provides lightweight, durable solutions for rapidly deployable space that reduces costs and risk. 2 armadainternational.com - february/march 2017 MADE IN armadainternational.com - february/march 2017 3 www.AARMobilitySystems.com THE USA FEBRUARY/MARCH 2017 www.armadainternational.com 08 AIR POWER COST VERSUS CREDIBILITY Andrew Drwiega examines maritime patrol aircraft procurement, and the options available for air forces and navies on a budget. 14 20 26 LAND Warfare TURING STIRLING CLASS WAR CATCH-22 VEHICLES FOR CHANGE Stephen W. Miller examines how the designs of Thomas Withington examines the Link-22 tactical Andrew White uncovers some of the latest light armoured vehicles are changing around data link, its workings and what it heralds for advances in vehicle technology to help the world. tomorrow’s naval operations. commandos reach their objectives. 32 38 FUTURE TECHNOLOGIES SEA POWER 44 THE MAN WHO FELL TO EARTH WHAT LIES BENEATH LAND Warfare Parachute technology is over a century old and is Warship definitions are becoming increasingly PREVENTION IS BETTER THAN CURE being continually refined, thanks to advances in blurred due to technological advances. Are we Claire Apthorp explores some of the innovative design and manufacturing, Peter Donaldson moving towards the multipurpose combatant, asks methods being adopted for military vehicle finds out. Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Prospectus
    Nexteer Automotive Group Limited 耐世特汽車系統集團有限公司 (Incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands with limited liability) (Stock Code : 01316) Joint Global Coordinators, Joint Bookrunners and Joint Sponsors Financial Advisor >cfYXc F]]\i`e^ IMPORTANT: If you are in any doubt about any of the contents of this Prospectus, you should seek independent professional advice. Nexteer Automotive Group Limited 耐世特汽車系統集團有限公司 (Incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands with limited liability) GLOBAL OFFERING Number of Offer Shares in the Global Offering : 720,000,000 Shares (subject to the Over-allotment Option) Number of Hong Kong Offer Shares : 72,000,000 Shares (subject to adjustment) Number of International Offer Shares : 648,000,000 Shares (subject to adjustment and the Over-allotment Option) Maximum Offer Price : HK$3.57 per Hong Kong Offer Share, plus brokerage of 1%, SFC transaction levy of 0.003%, and Hong Kong Stock Exchange trading fee of 0.005% (payable in full on application in Hong Kong dollars and subject to refund) Nominal value : HK$0.10 per Share Stock code : 01316 Joint Global Coordinators, Joint Bookrunners and Joint Sponsors Financial Advisor Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited, The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited and Hong Kong Securities Clearing Company Limited take no responsibility for the contents of this Prospectus, make no representation as to its accuracy or completeness and expressly disclaim any liability whatsoever for any loss howsoever arising from or in reliance upon the whole or any part of the contents of this Prospectus. A copy of this Prospectus, having attached thereto the documents specified in “Appendix VI — Documents Delivered to the Registrar of Companies and Available for Inspection,” has been registered by the Registrar of Companies in Hong Kong as required by Section 342C of the Companies Ordinance (Chapter 32 of the Laws of Hong Kong).
    [Show full text]
  • Singapore Defense Artillery Force
    49 PUEiFACE * This document is one of a series prepared under instructions from the Supreme Cormmander for the Allied Powers to the Japanese Governrien-t (SCAPIN No. 126, 12 Oct 19'45). The series covers not only the operations of the Japanese armed forces during World War- II but also their operations in China and M4anchuria which preceded the world conflict. The original studies were written by former officers of the Japanese Army and Navy under the supervision of the Historical Rrecords Section of the First (Army) and Second (Navy) Demobilization Bureaus of the Japanese Govern aent. The manuscripts were translated by the ilitary Intelligence Service Group, G2, Headcuarters, Far East Commiiand. 1 tensive editing has ,been ac- colmplished by the Foreign Iistories Division of the Office of the Military History Officer, Headquarters, United States Aynj Japan. Monograph No. 68 is a report made 'by Lt Col. Tadataka Nu na- guchi of Army Technical: Ieadquarters and aij. Katsuji Akiyana of the Army Heavy Artillery.. School of an' inspection tour of Singapore and Java between Mj4arch and May 1;42. It covers the condition of the fortresses and weapons on those islands; an estimate of the nixiiber of weapons, since at that time a complete count had not been accomplished, and recowmendations in regard to their use and dis- posal. As the oasic manuscript fromil which this st~idy was prepared was particularly poor and filled. with. obvious errors, Lti. Col. NJumagu- chi, now a civilian in Tokyo, and Maj . Akiyama, now a colonel with the Japanese Self lDefense Force, have been interviewed on.
    [Show full text]
  • Classement Général
    Défi Inter-Entreprises de Bourges 2019 Classement Général Place Dossard Equipe Catégorie Place Caté Temps CAP VTT Canoé Défi de Bourges 1. 101 BASE AERIENNE 702 1 Eq. Homme 1. 0h33'20'' 0h12'32'' 0h18'38'' 0h02'09'' 2. 1 ECOLE MILITAIRE BOURGES 1 Eq. Mixte 1. 0h34'34'' 0h12'33'' 0h19'36'' 0h02'24'' 3. 199 COPIEFAX Eq. Mixte 2. 0h35'04'' 0h14'08'' 0h17'53'' 0h03'02'' 4. 102 BASE AERIENNE 702 2 Eq. Homme 2. 0h35'43'' 0h13'03'' 0h20'18'' 0h02'21'' 5. 138 DGA TECHNIQUES TERRESTRES 4 Eq. Homme 3. 0h35'44'' 0h13'37'' 0h20'01'' 0h02'06'' 6. 2 ECOLE MILITAIRE BOURGES 2 Eq. Homme 4. 0h35'50'' 0h14'05'' 0h19'25'' 0h02'18'' 7. 32 MBDA 8 Eq. Homme 5. 0h35'53'' 0h15'12'' 0h18'31'' 0h02'10'' 8. 91 SNCF MOBILITES Eq. Homme 6. 0h36'15'' 0h14'52'' 0h18'15'' 0h03'07'' 9. 145 MAIRIE DE BOURGES 7 Eq. Mixte 3. 0h36'30'' 0h15'20'' 0h18'22'' 0h02'47'' 10. 232 MICHELIN 2 - EQUIPE B Eq. Homme 7. 0h37'01'' 0h14'06'' 0h20'27'' 0h02'27'' 11. 27 MBDA 3 Eq. Homme 8. 0h37'29'' 0h16'02'' 0h19'10'' 0h02'16'' 12. 74 SNCF RESEAU EIC Eq. Homme 9. 0h37'34'' 0h15'29'' 0h19'19'' 0h02'45'' 13. 245 NEXTER SYSTEMS 7 Eq. Homme 10. 0h37'48'' 0h15'43'' 0h19'39'' 0h02'25'' 14. 31 MBDA 7 Eq. Homme 11. 0h37'54'' 0h15'54'' 0h19'29'' 0h02'30'' 15. 93 NEXTER MUNITIONS 2 Eq. Homme 12. 0h37'58'' 0h15'50'' 0h19'55'' 0h02'11'' 16.
    [Show full text]
  • Constellium Business and Sustainability Report 2020
    BUSINESS AND SUSTAINABILITY PERFORMANCE REPORT 2020 REVEALING OUR RESILIENCE Revealing Sustainability Per formance our Resilience Report Report 04 CEO Interview 40 Sustainability Highlights 70 Financial Statements 07 A Global Sector Leader 42 Assessing Material 74 Sustainability Performance 08 Creating Value Throughout Sustainability Risks 82 GRI the Lifecycle of Aluminium 44 Staying One Step Ahead of Market 88 Memberships 10 CFO Interview Regulatory Changes 89 Report of the Independent Third Party 11 Business Units 45 Adjusting Our Targets and Defning 12 Pursuing a Comprehensive Strategy Future Perspectives 13 Our Values 46 Our Sustainability Targets for 2021 16 Governance 47 Analyzing Environmental Impacts 22 Focusing on Environment, Health, with Life Cycle Assessments and Safety (EHS) 48 Developing Products 24 Manufacturing Excellence with Envrionmental Benefts 50 Championing Recycling 52 Prioritizing Customer Satisfaction Business 54 Attracting, Engaging, and Retaining Report the Best People 56 Gender Diversity 28 PacKaging 58 Supporting Our Local Communities 30 Automotive 59 Respecting Human Rights 34 Aerospace 61 Limiting Landflled Waste 36 Transportation, Industry, and Defense 62 Curtailing Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions 65 Minimizing Air Emissions and Managing Water 66 Insisting Upon Sustainable Procurement 68 Actively Supporting the Aluminium Stewardship Initiative Constellium’s non-financial performance statement (“déclaration de performance extra-financière”), in- cluded in this report (as specified on page 74), was verified by an independent third party, Pricewaterhouse- Coopers Audit. PricewaterhouseCoopers Audit verifed compliance of our statement with the provisions of the French Commercial Code (article R. 225-105), along with the fairness of the information provided in our state- ment, such as Key performance indicators and measures taken to address risks (article R.
    [Show full text]
  • Wechsel in Der Geschäftsführung Bei Krauss-Maffei Wegmann
    PRESS RELEASE New Managing Director at KMW Asia Pacific Munich, Singapore, December 2016. – Christoph Cords is to be the new Managing Director of Krauss-Maffei Wegmann Asia Pacific (KMW Asia Pacific). As of 1 January 2017, he will be assuming the leadership of the KMW subsidiary in Singapore, being in charge of all sales and after-sales activities for the Asian/Pacific region. Christoph Cords joined KMW in 2007. At the request of Corporate Management in 2009 he took up a managerial position at ARTEC GmbH, a joint venture of KMW and Rheinmetall for the BOXER Project. In 2014, the 39-year-old industrial engineer returned to KMW to manage the spare parts logistics department. Christoph Cords Foto: KMW Press contact PRESS RELEASE Should you have any further questions, please contact: Dr. Kurt Braatz Vice President Strategy and Corporate Communications Krauss-Maffei Wegmann GmbH & Co. KG Krauss-Maffei-Str. 11 80997 Munich Germany Tel.: +49 89 8140 4675 Fax: +49 89 8140 4977 E-Mail: [email protected] www.kmweg.de Krauss-Maffei Wegmann GmbH & Co. KG leads the European market for highly protected wheeled and tracked vehicles. At locations in Germany, Brazil, Greece, Mexico, the Netherlands, Singapore, the United Kingdom, the USA and Turkey more than 4.000 employees develop, manufacture and support a product portfolio ranging from air-transportable, highly protected wheeled vehicles (MUNGO, AMPV*, DINGO, GFF4 and BOXER*) through reconnaissance, anti- aircraft and artillery systems (FENNEK, GEPARD, LeFlaSys*, Armoured Howitzer PzH2000, DONAR* and AGM) to main battle tanks (LEOPARD 1 and 2), infantry fighting vehicles (PUMA*) and bridgelaying systems.
    [Show full text]
  • ISSUE 5 AADH05 OFC+Spine.Indd 1 the Mortar Company
    ARTILLERY AND AIR DEFENCE ARTILLERY ISSUE 5 HANDBOOK HANDBOOK – ISSUE 5 PUBLISHED MARCH 2018 THE CONCISE GLOBAL INDUSTRY GUIDE ARTILLERY AND AIR DEFENCE AADH05_OFC+spine.indd 1 3/16/2018 10:18:59 AM The Mortar Company. CONFRAG® CONTROLS – THE NEW HIGH EXPLOSIVE STANDARD HDS has developed CONFRAG® technology to increase the lethal performance of the stan- dard High Explosive granade for 60 mm CDO, 60 mm, 81 mm and 120 mm dramatically. The HE lethality is increased by controlling fragmentation mass and quantity, fragment velocity and fragment distribution, all controlled by CONFRAG® technology. hds.hirtenberger.com AADH05_IFC_Hirtenberger.indd 2 3/16/2018 9:58:03 AM CONTENTS Editor 3 Introduction Tony Skinner. [email protected] Grant Turnbull, Editor of Land Warfare International magazine, welcomes readers to Reference Editors Issue 5 of Shephard Media’s Artillery and Air Defence Handbook. Ben Brook. [email protected] 4 Self-propelled howitzers Karima Thibou. [email protected] A guide to self-propelled artillery systems that are under development, in production or being substantially modernised. Commercial Manager Peter Rawlins [email protected] 29 Towed howitzers Details of towed artillery systems that are under development, in production or Production and Circulation Manager David Hurst. being substantially modernised. [email protected] 42 Self-propelled mortars Production Elaine Effard, Georgina Kerridge Specifications for self-propelled mortar systems that are under development, in Georgina Smith, Adam Wakeling. production or being substantially modernised. Chairman Nick Prest 53 Towed mortars Descriptions of towed heavy mortar systems that are under development, in CEO Darren Lake production or being substantially modernised.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development and Design of Bronze Ordnance, Sixteenth
    The Development and Design of Bronze Ordnance, Sixteenth through Nineteenth Centuries by Chuck Meide The College of William & Mary November 2002 The Development and Design of Bronze Ordnance, Sixteenth through Nineteenth Centuries Introduction 1 Evolution, 16th-19th Centuries 1 Typology 1 Bronze vs. Iron 8 Decline of Bronze Ordnance 10 Morphology 13 Nomenclature 13 Decoration 25 Composition 30 Conclusion 31 References 33 Introduction “Ordnance is the most accurate and acceptable generic term which embraces all those weapons of war which use an explosive charge to propel a missile in the direction of the enemy, and which are larger than those which can be used as personal arms” (Hughes 1969: 1). The technical development and unreserved application of cannon (a term which in its modern sense encompasses all of the types mentioned below) played a key role in European expansion and colonial hegemony (cf. Cipolla 1965). Ordnance remains, therefore, are of great interest to archaeologists studying this process, or that of technological change in general. In addition, ordnance—and especially bronze as opposed to iron pieces—usually proves the most diagnostic artifacts found on a shipwreck or military site. This study is an overview of the history of the development, design, and manufacture of bronze muzzle-loading ordnance, which were widely used by the world’s military forces from the 16th to mid-19th centuries. Discussion is limited for the most part to guns (what are usually termed cannon), but also to mortars, howitzers, and to a lesser degree types such as the carronade and swivel gun. Evolution, 16th-19th Centuries Typology Cannon of the 16th century inherited a medieval system of naming and classification.
    [Show full text]
  • Artillery Through the Ages, by Albert Manucy 1
    Artillery Through the Ages, by Albert Manucy 1 Artillery Through the Ages, by Albert Manucy The Project Gutenberg EBook of Artillery Through the Ages, by Albert Manucy This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org Title: Artillery Through the Ages A Short Illustrated History of Cannon, Emphasizing Types Used in America Author: Albert Manucy Release Date: January 30, 2007 [EBook #20483] Language: English Artillery Through the Ages, by Albert Manucy 2 Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1 *** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK ARTILLERY THROUGH THE AGES *** Produced by Juliet Sutherland, Christine P. Travers and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net ARTILLERY THROUGH THE AGES A Short Illustrated History of Cannon, Emphasizing Types Used in America UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fred A. Seaton, Secretary NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Conrad L. Wirth, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. -- Price 35 cents (Cover) FRENCH 12-POUNDER FIELD GUN (1700-1750) ARTILLERY THROUGH THE AGES A Short Illustrated History of Cannon, Emphasizing Types Used in America Artillery Through the Ages, by Albert Manucy 3 by ALBERT MANUCY Historian Southeastern National Monuments Drawings by Author Technical Review by Harold L. Peterson National Park Service Interpretive Series History No. 3 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON: 1949 (Reprint 1956) Many of the types of cannon described in this booklet may be seen in areas of the National Park System throughout the country.
    [Show full text]