Presidential Voter Guide

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Presidential Voter Guide 2016 NHLA Presidential Candidate Voter Guide On February 24, 2016, NHLA issued a questionnaire to each of the presidential candidates from both major political parties with questions that were based on its 2016 Hispanic Public Policy Agenda. Each of the candidates was invited to provide their responses to these questions by March 25, 2016. As of September 27, 2016, no responses have been received from candidate Donald Trump. In lieu of his responses, information on the candidate’s positions are included based on publicly available sources. This voter guide will be updated when or if the candidate’s responses are received. NHLA does not endorse or oppose any candidate for public office. This document is based on the responses that were provided to us by the presidential candidates or their public statements. It is not intended to interpret, examine, or opine on any of the responses or the lack thereof. While we encourage the public to read these responses, any candidate’s fitness for office should be judged on a variety of qualifications that go beyond their responses to the questions that follow. National Hispanic Leadership Agenda • 815 16th St. NW, 3rd Floor • Washington, DC 20006 • 202‐508‐6919 • nationalhispanicleadership.org • @NHLAgenda TOPIC BACKGROUND QUESTION CANDIDATE RESPONSE FEDERAL Since 2011, federal efforts to reduce the deficit In your investment agenda As president, I would prioritize investments that drive job creation, productivity, and higher wages have relied more on cuts to domestic — including infrastructure that will put Americans back to work, education from early childhood BUDGET for the federal budget, what discretionary programs rather than on raising to college to unlock the potential of every American, basic research, clean energy, job training and revenue. The 2011 Budget Control Act set strict domestic programs would apprenticeships, and more. caps on discretionary funding through across‐ you prioritize for increased the‐board budget cuts known as sequestration. or decreased funding? For example, I would increase federal infrastructure funding by $275 billion over a five‐year period, While a partial lifting of sequestration was fully paying for these investments through business tax reform. According to the White House included in the 2013 and 2015 Bipartisan Council of Economic Advisers, every $1 billion in infrastructure investment creates 13,000 jobs. Budget Acts, investments in non‐defense Moreover, the vast majority of the jobs created by infrastructure investment are good‐paying, domestic discretionary programs have been cut middle‐class jobs — paying above the national median. dramatically in recent years. We also need to make it much easier for every American to join and stay in the labor force and find a good job by making quality child care more affordable, ensuring America is no longer the only developed nation without paid leave, and ensuring that workers are provided with fair schedules, fair wages and overtime pay. That’s how we will create a full employment economy with a tight labor market that drives rising pay for workers, gives every worker a pathway to a good job, and ensures everyday Americans share in the rewards — not just those at the top. The response below was not provided by the candidate’s campaign. It is based on information from publicly available sources. We continue to welcome the candidate’s direct response and will update this voter guide accordingly. “We will build the next generation of roads, bridges, railways, tunnels, sea ports and airports that our country deserves. American cars will travel the roads, American planes will connect our cities, and American ships will patrol the seas. American steel will send new skyscrapers soaring.”1 “These projects put people to work—not just the people doing the work but also the manufacturers, the suppliers, the designers, and, yes, even the lawyers. The Senate Budget Committee estimates that rebuilding America will create 13 million jobs.”2 “I am going to save Social Security without any cuts. I know where to get the money from. Nobody else does.”3 Trump’s budget plans also include significant cuts or possible elimination of the Department of Education and Environmental Protection Agency.4 1 “An America First Economic Plan: Winning the Global Competition” speech delivered at the Detroit Economic Club, August 8, 2016. http://fortune.com/2016/08/08/trump‐economic‐speech‐detroit/ 2 Crippled America: How to Make America Great Again, by Donald Trump. http://abcnews.go.com/US/book‐excerpt‐donald‐trumps‐crippled‐america‐make‐america/story?id=34931608 3 Tweet from Donald Trump. https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/601544572498509824 4 “Donald Trump Vows to Slash Funding for Education, EPA” Wall Street Journal, January 11, 2016. http://www.wsj.com/articles/donald‐trump‐vows‐to‐slash‐funding‐for‐education‐epa‐1452551107 ECONOMIC Latinos are overrepresented in low‐wage What tax and wage policies The typical Latino household earns more than 20% less than the typical white household, and EMPOWERMENT occupations and have lower levels of household would you pursue to help Latinas earn, on average, 55 cents for every dollar earned by a white man. I have fought to raise wealth than other racial and ethnic groups. the minimum wage for many years and will do so as president. A higher minimum wage doesn't Because Latinos are overrepresented in low‐ working families earn a just help those at the bottom of the pay scale, it strengthens the economy and helps American wage jobs, the effect of wage stagnation on living that supports their workers and families. We should also support state and local efforts to go above the federal floor their economic well‐being is particularly needs? where it makes sense to do so. I was pleased to see President Obama expand overtime rules, profound, with 67 percent of Latinos reporting which was an important step. We also need to work to close the wage gap for Latinas. And in a recent poll that they are not earning throughout all of this, we need to ensure workers have the collective bargaining power they need enough to meet their basic expenses. Forty‐two to fight for fair wages and decent benefits. percent of all Latinos earn poverty‐level wages despite having the highest rate of labor force We also need a more progressive tax system, to make sure that corporations and those at the top participation among all racial and ethnic pay their fair share. As president, I will provide middle class tax relief and ask the wealthiest Americans to pay more. That groups. means getting rid of the loophole that allows hedge fund managers to pay a lower tax rate. It also means implementing the “Buffett Rule,” so that millionaires never pay a lower effective tax rate than middle class families; imposing a surtax on the incomes of multi‐millionaires; and cracking down on loopholes that allow corporations to shift profits overseas. We need a fairer tax system and a safer financial system that works on behalf of all working families. The response below was not provided by the candidate’s campaign. It is based on information from publicly available sources. We continue to welcome the candidate’s direct response and will update this voter guide accordingly. “I am proposing an across‐the‐board income tax reduction, especially for middle‐income Americans. This will lead to millions of new good‐paying jobs. The rich will pay their fair share, but no one will pay so much that it destroys jobs, or undermines our ability to compete. As part of this reform, we will eliminate the Carried Interest Deduction and other special interest loopholes that have been so good for Wall Street investors, and people like me, but unfair to American workers.” “My plan will reduce the current number of brackets from 7 to 3, and dramatically streamline the process. We will work with House Republicans on this plan, using the same brackets they have proposed: 12, 25 and 33 percent.” “No one will gain more from these proposals than low‐and‐middle income Americans. My plan will also help reduce the cost of childcare by allowing parents to fully deduct the average cost of childcare spending from their taxes.”5 “I don’t want to raise the minimum wage. I want to create jobs so people can get much more than that, so they can get five times what the minimum wage is.” 6 5 “An America First Economic Plan: Winning the Global Competition” speech delivered at the Detroit Economic Club, August 8, 2016. http://fortune.com/2016/08/08/trump‐economic‐speech‐detroit/ 6 “Trump: Why is federal government making money on student loans?“ The Hill, July 23, 2015. http://thehill.com/policy/finance/248913‐trump‐why‐is‐federal‐government‐making‐money‐on‐student‐loans WORKING Many Latino workers experience violations of What policies and It is vital that we modernize basic labor standards. Worker protections and basic labor standards CONDITIONS minimum wage, overtime pay and other labor have failed to keep pace with changes over the past half century. I was an original co‐ sponsor of protections. In many cases the workers are employment‐law the Employee Free Choice Act, and I support the WAGE Act. We also need to raise wages and laboring for a company that denies it is an enforcement approaches reduce poverty among working families, including supporting and strengthening workers’ right to "employer" of such workers; it contends that organize and bargain collectively, raising the minimum wage, eradicating wage theft, ensuring a staffing agency or labor contractor is the do you support to that employers do not misclassify true employees as “independent contractors” to skirt their sole "employer" or misclassifies the workers reduce exploitation of obligations, and leveling the playing field for women and people of color.
Recommended publications
  • Thomas Hardiman Trump’S Supreme Court Shortlist: Thomas Hardiman
    ALLIANCE FOR JUSTICE SNAPSHOT Trump’s Supreme Court Shortlist: Thomas Hardiman Trump’s Supreme Court Shortlist: Thomas Hardiman Thomas Hardiman, currently a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, is on President Trump’s shortlist for the U.S. Supreme Court. Protections for the Wealthy and Powerful Over the Rights of All Hardiman consistently sides with the wealthy and powerful at the expense of everyday people. He has taken the position that it should be more difficult for everyday Americans –– workers, consumers, middle-class Americans, and small business owners –– to hold corporations and bad actors accountable. In 2018, Hardiman announced to a Federalist Society Convention: “If I were able to do something unilaterally, I would probably institute a new federal rule that said that all cases worth less than $500,000 will be tried without any discovery.” Such a rule would enable corporations and those who commit wrongdoing to hide critical evidence and deprive those with modest-dollar cases of their ability to argue their case in court, including individuals whose cases involve important rights. Hardiman has repeatedly ruled against the rights of workers. In 2015, Hardiman sided against nearly 1,800 truck drivers who were laid off and not paid approximately $8 million they were owed due to the short notice. Under Hardiman’s decision about the company’s bankruptcy, which the Supreme Court later reversed, banks and other lenders were paid first. One person from the company who had terminal cancer was unable to find replacement health insurance and passed away. In another case, Hardiman ruled for Allstate after it fired 6,200 sales agents, offering to bring them back as independent contractors on the condition that they sign away their rights to existing claims against the company, including discrimination claims.
    [Show full text]
  • Notre Dame Lawyer—2018 Notre Dame Law School
    Notre Dame Law School NDLScholarship Notre Dame Lawyer Law School Publications 2018 Notre Dame Lawyer—2018 Notre Dame Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/nd_lawyer Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Notre Dame Law School, "Notre Dame Lawyer—2018" (2018). Notre Dame Lawyer. 39. https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/nd_lawyer/39 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School Publications at NDLScholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Notre Dame Lawyer by an authorized administrator of NDLScholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Q&A with Dean Newton Pg. 2 Big Ideas The expansion of ND Law’s intellectual property program is bearing fruit Pg. 20 20 18 A DIFFERENT KIND of LAWYER PHOTOGRAPHY Alicia Sachau and University Marketing Communications EDITOR Kevin Allen Notre Dame Lawyer 1337 Biolchini Hall Notre Dame, IN 46556 574-631-5962 [email protected] Inside 2 Dean Newton 4 Briefs & News 10 Profiles: A Different Kind of Lawyer 16 London Law at 50 20 Intellectual Property 26 Father Mike 30 Faculty News 36 Alumni Notes 44 In Memoriam 46 The Couples of ’81 48 Interrogatory Briefs Dean Newton Steps Down Joseph A. Matson Dean and Professor of Law Nell Jessup Newton will conclude her tenure as dean of Notre Dame Law School on June 30, 2019, after 10 years of service. What was your rela- ÅZ[\\QUMIVLM^MVUMM\QVO sion that leads to follow-up tionship with Notre Dame Fr. Ted. These memories MUIQT[)_ITSIZW]VL\PM before you became the Law are even more tender TISM[WZ\W\PM/ZW\\WKIV School’s dean? because Rob died in 1995 provide a moment to be My brother Rob Mier of lymphoma caused by his grateful for all the ways that attended ND on a Navy exposure to Agent Orange the Notre Dame community ROTC scholarship.
    [Show full text]
  • Worry Over Mistreating Clots Drove Push to Pause J&J Shot
    P2JW109000-6-A00100-17FFFF5178F ****** MONDAY,APRIL 19,2021~VOL. CCLXXVII NO.90 WSJ.com HHHH $4.00 Last week: DJIA 34200.67 À 400.07 1.2% NASDAQ 14052.34 À 1.1% STOXX 600 442.49 À 1.2% 10-YR. TREASURY À 27/32 , yield 1.571% OIL $63.13 À $3.81 EURO $1.1982 YEN 108.81 Bull Run What’s News In Stocks Widens, Business&Finance Signaling More stocks have been propelling the U.S. market higher lately,asignal that fur- Strength ther gains could be ahead, but howsmooth the climb might be remains up fordebate. A1 Technical indicators WeWork’s plan to list suggestmoregains, stock by merging with a but some question how blank-check company has echoes of its approach in smooth theywill be 2019,when the shared-office provider’s IPO imploded. A1 BY CAITLIN MCCABE Citigroup plans to scale up its services to wealthy GES Agreater number of stocks entrepreneurs and their IMA have been propelling the U.S. businesses in Asia as the market higher lately,asignal bank refocuses its opera- GETTY that—if historyisany indica- tions in the region. B1 SE/ tor—moregains could be ahead. What remains up forde- A Maryland hotel mag- bate, however, is how smooth natebehind an 11th-hour bid ANCE-PRES FR the climb will be. to acquireTribune Publish- Indicatorsthat point to a ing is working to find new ENCE stronger and moreresilient financing and partnership AG stock market have been hitting options after his partner ON/ LL rare milestones recently as the withdrew from the deal.
    [Show full text]
  • Trump Judges: Even More Extreme Than Reagan and Bush Judges
    Trump Judges: Even More Extreme Than Reagan and Bush Judges September 3, 2020 Executive Summary In June, President Donald Trump pledged to release a new short list of potential Supreme Court nominees by September 1, 2020, for his consideration should he be reelected in November. While Trump has not yet released such a list, it likely would include several people he has already picked for powerful lifetime seats on the federal courts of appeals. Trump appointees' records raise alarms about the extremism they would bring to the highest court in the United States – and the people he would put on the appellate bench if he is reelected to a second term. According to People For the American Way’s ongoing research, these judges (including those likely to be on Trump’s short list), have written or joined more than 100 opinions or dissents as of August 31 that are so far to the right that in nearly one out of every four cases we have reviewed, other Republican-appointed judges, including those on Trump’s previous Supreme Court short lists, have disagreed with them.1 Considering that every Republican president since Ronald Reagan has made a considerable effort to pick very conservative judges, the likelihood that Trump could elevate even more of his extreme judicial picks raises serious concerns. On issues including reproductive rights, voting rights, police violence, gun safety, consumer rights against corporations, and the environment, Trump judges have consistently sided with right-wing special interests over the American people – even measured against other Republican-appointed judges. Many of these cases concern majority rulings issued or joined by Trump judges.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgetown Law's Federalist Society Student Chapter Will Host the 37Th
    Georgetown Law’s Federalist Society Student Chapter will host the 37th National Student Symposium on March 9-10, 2018. The topic of the Symposium is "First Principles of the Constitution." FRIDAY, MARCH 9, 2018 Debate: The Judicial Power: The Judicial Duty to Follow the Law or a Discretionary Power of Judicial Review? 6:00 p.m. - 7:30 p.m. Hart Auditorium, Georgetown University Law Center Hamilton referred to the federal judiciary as the “least dangerous” branch of the new federal government. But the Court has clearly done more than he envisioned. What is its proper role? How much should judges interpret the exact text and how much should they look to the core principles the text seeks to protect? ● Justice Clint Bolick, Arizona Supreme Court ​ ● Ed Whelan, President, Ethics & Public Policy Center, former Law Clerk to Justice ​ Scalia, and Co-Editor, Scalia Speaks: Reflections on Law, Faith and Life Well ​ Lived ● Moderator: Judge Kevin C. Newsom, United States Court of Appeals, ​ ​ Eleventh Circuit Presentation of the 2017 Article I Initiative Writing Contest Award by Mr. Christopher DeMuth, Co-Chairman, Board of Visitors, The Federalist Society 7:30 p.m. – 7:45 p.m. Hart Auditorium, Georgetown University Law Center Cocktail Reception 8:00 p.m. - 10:00 p.m. Supreme Court of the United States 1 First St., N.E., Washington, DC (NOTE: Due to space constraints, the reception is only open to the first 300 law student registrants.) SATURDAY, MARCH 10, 2018 Ending Government-by-Litigation: An Address by Attorney General Jeff Sessions (Conference Registration & ID REQUIRED) 8:30 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Donald Trump Is Not Always an Easy Man to Take Seriously. It's Difficult To
    1 Donald Trump is not always an easy man to take seriously. It’s difficult to imagine the host of a reality TV show making an inaugural address or meeting with Pope Francis. It also isn’t always easy for some Americans to imagine the people who are voting for Donald Trump. When the image of Trump is paired with some of his comments that have an eerie resemblance to a history of racial demagoguery in this country, for some Americans picturing Trump supporters involves images of hateful people promoting ideas such as xenophobia and white supremacy. While it’s been revealed that some of the people who support Trump do in fact think that way, it would be unfair and inaccurate to attribute that ideology to all supporters. As Donald Trump wins more and more states in the primaries and other Republican candidates continue to drop out, it’s becoming increasingly more important to recognize and listen to voices of those voting for Trump. Their opinions speak to very real feelings among an increasing segment of the United States population. In the following case study, a group of Trump supporters express their reasons for voting Trump. Throughout the interviews many common themes appeared time after time in every interview. The themes are broken down into the following chapters: Trump’s position as an outsider and businessman, his public personality, the role of nationalism in the 2016 election, and the role of race and racism within what some believe to be a “post­racial” United States. While I’ve included some analysis using other scholarly works in order to better understand particular viewpoints, the majority of this study is Trump supporters expressing their own reasons for voting for Trump.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pennsylvania State University
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School REMEMBERING JIMMY CARTER THE RHETORICAL EVOCATIONS OF PRESIDENTIAL MEMORIES A Thesis in Communication Arts and Sciences by Brandon M. Johnson 2020 Brandon M. Johnson Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts August 2020 The thesis of Brandon M. Johnson was reviewed and approved by the following: Mary E. Stuckey Professor, Communication Arts and Sciences Thesis Advisor Stephen H. Browne Liberal Arts Professor of Communication Arts and Sciences Michael J. Steudeman Assistant Professor of Rhetoric and Director of CAS100A Denise H. Solomon Head and Liberal Arts Professor of Communication Arts and Sciences iii ABSTRACT This thesis is an analysis of the public memory of Jimmy Carter and the way the historical resources of his presidency (including his perceived moral character) are interpreted and evoked as a shorthand for presidential failure by associating him with a rhetoric of weakness. Broadly, I consider the nature of presidential memory, asking how a presidency passes from history to memory. I suggest that presidential histories serve as inventional resources in the present, with rhetors evoking interpretations of the past as rhetorical appeals. These appeals are acts of memory, and analyzing how they function discursively and are deployed strategically draws out how presidential memory works and what implications it has to presidential rhetoric. The different strategies used in remembering the presidency of Jimmy Carter are useful texts for rhetorically critiquing this process because Carter is often deployed as a rhetorical shorthand, providing a representative example of interpreting presidential pasts. I begin by considering the evolving scholarship and historiography on Carter and conceptualizing how presidential pasts can be interpreted in the present through acts of remembering.
    [Show full text]
  • (26Ee61f) [Pdf] Time to Get Tough: Making America #1 Again Donald J. Trump, Malcolm Hillgartner
    [pdf] Time To Get Tough: Making America #1 Again Donald J. Trump, Malcolm Hillgartner - pdf free book Read Online Time to Get Tough: Making America #1 Again E-Books, PDF Download Time to Get Tough: Making America #1 Again Free Collection, Time to Get Tough: Making America #1 Again Free Read Online, Read Time to Get Tough: Making America #1 Again Ebook Download, by Donald J. Trump, Malcolm Hillgartner pdf Time to Get Tough: Making America #1 Again, Read Time to Get Tough: Making America #1 Again Online Free, Free Download Time to Get Tough: Making America #1 Again Ebooks Donald J. Trump, Malcolm Hillgartner, online pdf Time to Get Tough: Making America #1 Again, book pdf Time to Get Tough: Making America #1 Again, Read Best Book Online Time to Get Tough: Making America #1 Again, Donald J. Trump, Malcolm Hillgartner ebook Time to Get Tough: Making America #1 Again, Time to Get Tough: Making America #1 Again Free Download, pdf Donald J. Trump, Malcolm Hillgartner Time to Get Tough: Making America #1 Again, Time to Get Tough: Making America #1 Again PDF read online, Read Time to Get Tough: Making America #1 Again Online Free, Read Best Book Time to Get Tough: Making America #1 Again Online, Time to Get Tough: Making America #1 Again Donald J. Trump, Malcolm Hillgartner pdf, book pdf Time to Get Tough: Making America #1 Again, Download PDF Time to Get Tough: Making America #1 Again Free Online, Free Download Time to Get Tough: Making America #1 Again Best Book, CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD mobi, kindle, pdf, epub Description: And so I have asked
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring the Assurances of Female Political Leaders: Hillary Clinton On
    “Measuring the Assurances of Female Political Leaders: Hillary Clinton on the Campaign Trail” Paper presented to panel B10: “Responsiveness and Representation” May 31, 201, 10:30-12 pm, CL 305 Annual meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association Regina Saskatchewan, May 30-June 1, 2018 Abstract: A well-established maxim within the political leadership literature holds that most leaders, most of the time, seek to assure citizens in their public communications. The provision of such certainty is thought to be integral to the exercise of leadership: uncertain citizens seek advice and reassurance, and so they turn to political leaders who can provide such goods (Downs, 1957). This understanding has been studied empirically mainly with respect to male leaders (de Clercy, 2005). This study asks: do female political leader also communicate certainty and uncertainty to citizens and, if so, how may such messages compare with those of male leaders? The study focuses on Hillary Clinton, the first woman to campaign for the American presidency. Leader communications are evaluated by analysing the content of Clinton’s three televised 2016 presidential debate performances using Atlas.ti, a qualitative content analysis program. These findings are compared with the same speech sets for her opponent, Donald Trump. Then, these values are compared with similar data for a sample of two other male presidential candidates. The study finds Clinton fits the role of a classic transactional leader and given the small number of cases under study here, there seems to be no systematic difference in how she communicated assurances to citizens based on her gender. Copyright Cristine de Clercy, 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Federalist Paper Template
    THE Federalist PAPER THE MAGAZINE OF THE FEDERALIST SOCIETY • FEDSOC.ORG Summer 2018 THE FEATURES Federalist PAPER THE MAGAZINE OF THE FEDERALIST SOCIETY • FEDSOC.ORG BOARD OF DIRECTORS BOARD OF VISITORS Prof. Steven G. Calabresi, Chairman Mr. Christopher DeMuth, Co-Chairman Hon. David M. McIntosh, Vice Chairman Hon. Orrin G. Hatch, Co-Chairman Prof. Gary Lawson, Secretary Prof. Lillian BeVier Mr. Brent O. Hatch, Treasurer Mr. George T. Conway 4 National Student Hon. T. Kenneth Cribb Ms. Kimberly O. Dennis Hon. C. Boyden Gray Mr. Michael W. Gleba Symposium Mr. Leonard A. Leo, Executive VP Hon. Lois Haight Herrington Hon. Edwin Meese, III Hon. Donald Paul Hodel 6 Student Division Mr. Eugene B. Meyer, President Hon. Frank Keating, II Hon. Michael B. Mukasey Hon. Gale Norton 8 Lawyers Chapters Hon. Lee Liberman Otis, Senior VP Hon. Theodore B. Olson Prof. Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz Mr. Andrew J. Redleaf Hon. William Bradford Reynolds 10 Faculty Division Ms. Diana Davis Spencer Mr. Theodore W. Ullyot 12 Practice Groups STAFF 14 Article I President Executive Vice President Senior Vice President Eugene B. Meyer Leonard A. Leo Lee Liberman Otis 16 State Courts & AGs Student Division Lawyers Chapters Peter Redpath, VP & Director Lisa Budzynski Ezell, VP & Director 17 Regulatory Kamron Kompani, Deputy Director Sarah Landeene, Deputy Director Transparency Kate Alcantara, Deputy Director Katherine Fugate, Associate Director Faculty Division Practice Groups 18 Membership Lee Liberman Otis, Director Dean Reuter, VP & General Counsel Laura Flint, Deputy Director Anthony Deardurff, Deputy Director Wesley G. Hodges, Associate Director 19 Resources Jennifer Weinberg, Associate Director Micah Wallen, Assistant Director Brigid Flaherty, Assistant Director Regulatory Transparency Project External Relations Devon Westhill, Director Jonathan Bunch, VP & Director Colton Graub, Project Assistant Peter Bisbee, Director, State Courts Elizabeth Cirri, Assistant Director Article I Initiative Nathan Kaczmarek, Director International Affairs James P.
    [Show full text]
  • Senate Section (PDF929KB)
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 109 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 151 WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, MAY 19, 2005 No. 67 Senate The Senate met at 9:30 a.m. and was ceed to executive session for the con- Yesterday, 21 Senators—evenly di- called to order by the President pro sideration of calendar No. 71, which the vided, I believe 11 Republicans and 10 tempore (Mr. STEVENS). clerk will report. Democrats—debated for over 10 hours The legislative clerk read the nomi- on the nomination of Priscilla Owen. PRAYER nation of Priscilla Richman Owen, of We will continue that debate—10 hours The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- Texas, to be United States Circuit yesterday—maybe 20 hours, maybe 30 fered the following prayer: Judge for the Fifth Circuit. hours, and we will take as long as it Let us pray. RECOGNITION OF THE MAJORITY LEADER takes for Senators to express their God of grace and glory, open our eyes The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The views on this qualified nominee. to the power You provide for all of our majority leader is recognized. But at some point that debate should challenges. Give us a glimpse of Your SCHEDULE end and there should be a vote. It ability to do what seems impossible, to Mr. FRIST. Mr. President, today we makes sense: up or down, ‘‘yes’’ or exceed what we can request or imagine. will resume executive session to con- ‘‘no,’’ confirm or reject; and then we Encourage us again with Your promise sider Priscilla Owen to be a U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Measures Highlight Campaign Plan
    On the ballot Why should you care whether the U.S. Senate confirms a Measures highlight campaign plan Supreme Court nominee now? There are two very important ini- osition 227 of 1998 and would pro- sembly and Senate, Congress and It may seem like little more than tiatives on the November ballot, the vide services for ALL students in the Presidential campaigns. The CTA noise out of Washington, D.C. , but Children’s Education and Health state of California that would put Board approved a Campaign Plan at the current battle to get the U.S. Sen- Care Protection Act (CEHCP), which them on the path to becoming bilin- their May 17 meeting. Information ate to do its job by considering a new is the extension of the Prop 30 tax on gual. on the Campaign Plan will be shared high court nominee has important im- high wage earners, and the Education CTA members will be asked to at State Council, Service Center plications for every student, every ed- for a Global Economy (EdGE), work in support of these initiatives as Councils and in local rep meetings. ucator, every school, and every union which would repeal and amend prop- well as targeted races in the State As- member in our nation. In the years ahead, the U.S. Su- preme Court may rule on issues in- cluding the rights of teachers to due Field work surprises process and a fair hearing when charges are leveled. It could rule on CSO staff Ed Sibby got a welcome surprise when covering an the rights of schools to be fully fund- Alliance To Reclaim Our Schools walk-in event in Lake Elsinore ed in order to provide a high quality in early May.
    [Show full text]