DOCSLIB.ORG

Abdominal Obesity Defined As a Larger Than Expected Waist Girth Is

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Abdominal Obesity Defined As a Larger Than Expected Waist Girth Is Journal of Human Hypertension (2001) 15, 307–312 2001 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0950-9240/01 $15.00 www.nature.com/jhh ORIGINAL ARTICLE Abdominal obesity defined as a larger than expected waist girth is associated with racial/ethnic differences in risk of hypertension IS Okosun, S Choi, MM Dent, T Jobin and GEA Dever Department of Community Medicine, Mercer University School of Medicine 1550 College Street Macon, GA, USA Objective: Waist circumference (WC) cut-points of Results: Relative to white, black race/ethnicity was у102 cm and у88 cm for men and women, respectively, associated with ෂ1.8 and ෂ2.7 greater risk of hyperten- representing abdominal obesity have been recom- sion in men and women, respectively, adjusting for mended for determining obesity related co-morbidities. abdominal obesity, age, smoking and alcohol consump- However, these cut-points carry the component of gen- tion. Having larger than expected waist girths were eralised obesity estimated by body mass index (BMI). associated with 1.58 and 1.39 increased risk of hyper- The aim of this investigation was to determine whether tension in black men and black women, respectively, abdominal obesity free of the influence of overall heavi- adjusting for confounders. Population attributable risks ness is associated with increased risk of hypertension of hypertension due to abdominal obesity were approxi- in a representative sample of white and black Amer- mately 24.9% and 15.9%, in black men and black icans. women, respectively. from the Third US National Conclusions: In Americans, hypertension is a public (11114 ؍ Methods: Data (n Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were used in health problem that is closely linked to abdominal adi- this investigation. Standardised residual values from posity. An important research challenge therefore is to the linear regression of WC on BMI were used to define determine the best way to regulate body weight under abdominal obesity status. The risk of hypertension conditions of food abundance. There is a need to clarify associated with abdominal obesity was estimated from how lifestyle habits promote large waist sizes leading the logistic regression model, adjusting for age, smok- to abdominal adiposity and associated cardiovascular ing and alcohol. We also estimated the public health disease in the US, particularly among black Americans. consequences of abdominal obesity from the popu- Journal of Human Hypertension (2001) 15, 307–312 lation attributable fraction of hypertension. Keywords: waist circumference; abdominal obesity; ethnicity Introduction ometry. However, these imaging methods are not practical in large-scale field epidemiology. They are Although the link between abdominal adiposity and laborious and expensive, and their use carries risk cardiovascular diseases (CVD) is well documented 1–8 of radiation. Hence, there is a need to establish a in the epidemiologic literature, there is no con- relatively cheap and risk-free surrogate marker of sensus on the most reliable anthropometric variable these imaging techniques. for abdominal adiposity. Ideally, the best method for The two most commonly employed anthropo- determining abdominal obesity is by imaging tech- metric surrogates for imaging techniques in niques such as computerised tomography, magnetic determining abdominal adiposity are ratios of waist- resonance imaging or dual energy X-ray absorpti- to-hip girths (WHR) and waist circumference (WC). WHR has many shortcomings, including inherent weakness as a ratio index9,10 and strong influence Correspondence: Ike S Okosun, PhD, MPH, FRIPHH, Department by pelvic structure. Also, WHR is an unsatisfactory of Community Medicine, Mercer University School of Medicine, measure of abdominal fat mass, especially in non- 1550 College Street Macon, Georgia, 31207, USA 11 E-mail: okosunFiȰmercer.edu obese individuals. Indeed, non-obese and obese Received 26 June 2000; revised 19 September 2000; accepted 30 subjects can have the same WHR values. Further- November 2000 more, the sensitivity of WHR in detecting changes Abdominal obesity and hypertension IS Okosun et al 308 in body adiposity is low because gluteal fat and sub- uals aged 17–90 yeas for whom weight, height, cutaneous abdominal fat can be decreased in some waist, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and systolic subjects with weight loss.12 blood pressure (SBP) were obtained. Weight was WC has been endorsed as the best anthropometric measured at a standing position using a Toledo self- surrogate of abdominal adiposity.13,14 WC is an zeroing weight scale. Height was measured at an aggregate measurement of the actual amounts of upright position with a standiometer. Waist abdominal fat accumulation and is a crucial corre- measurement was made to the nearest 0.1 cm at the late of abnormal metabolic syndromes found among natural waist midpoint between the bottom of the obese and overweight subjects.15 Measurement of rib cage and above the top of the iliac crest. WC is simple and requires only a flexible tape meas- In NHANES III, three blood pressure measure- ure, furthermore, measurement error is low due to ments were obtained from each subject using a stan- large circumference. In addition, WC is more highly dard mercury sphygmomanometer at a 60-second correlated with visceral adipose tissue accumulation interval between inflation cuffs. The average of the than WHR.16 Visceral adiposity is the component of three readings was utilised for this analysis. Smok- body composition that is most highly associated ing and alcohol intake were assessed by self-report. with many metabolic abnormalities such as hyper- Smoking was categorised as 1 and 0, for current tension, glucose intolerance, hyperinsulinaemia, smokers and non-smokers, respectively. Alcohol use hypercholesterolaemia, hypertriglyceridaemia, and was graded as 1 for current drinkers and 0 for non- high levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.17–20 current drinkers. For this analysis, hypertension was Indeed, many are now advocating WC as a valid defined as DBP у90 mm Hg, SBP у140 mm Hg or anthropometric variable for health promotion and current treatment with prescribed anti-hyperten- the basis for alerting those at risk of CVD.21,22 sion medication.25 In a recent publication, the United States National Institute Health (NIH) expert panels recommended у у the WC cut-points of 102 cm and 88 cm, in men Statistical analysis and women as values representing risks for obesity- related comorbidities.13 These cut-points were Statistical programmes available in SPSS version determined after the review of published data ger- 10.0 for Windows were utilised for this analysis.26 mane to abdominal obesity in various journals pub- Racial/ethnic differences for continuous and categ- lished between 1980 and 1997. However, because orical variables were assessed with the Student’s t- these recommended WC cut-points do not account test and chi-squared statistics, respectively. The for overall body heaviness, there is a need to rede- standardised residual values from the linear fine WC corresponding to abdominal obesity devoid regression of WC on BMI were utilised to establish of generalised obesity. The aims of this investigation abdominal obesity status. Abdominal obesity was were therefore to define abdominal obesity free of thus defined as WC larger than expected WC as pre- the influence of overall heaviness as determined by dicted from BMI.27 These predicted WC values cor- body mass index (BMI), and to investigate if such respond to WC adjusted for BMI. measure is associated with increased risk of hyper- Predicted WC values were derived from residuals tension in a representative sample of white and obtained from linear regression of WC on BMI.27 For black Americans. We also sought to examine if white men the residuals were obtained from the equ- abdominal obesity free of the influence of general- ation: WC = 2.49*BMI + 31.31. The corresponding ised obesity was associated with racial/ethnic differ- residuals for white women were obtained from WC ences in the risk of hypertension. = 2.21*BMI + 31.34. For black subjects, the residuals were obtained from WC = 2.56*BMI + 24.07 for men, and were obtained from WC = 2.11*BMI + 32.34 for Materials and methods women. The positive residuals represent abdominal 27 Data source adiposity adjusted for BMI. We estimated the risk of hypertension that was Data from the Third US National Health and associated with abdominal obesity by classifying the Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III), as pro- residuals from regression of WC on BMI.27 Negative vided by the National Center for Health Statistics, residual values (less than expected) were coded as were used in this investigation. The sampling and 0 and positive values (greater than expected) were measurement procedures have been described in coded as 1, and utilised as an independent variable detail by other investigators.23,24 Briefly, NHANES in the race/ethnicity and gender specific logistic III is a multistage probability sample of non-insti- regression model, adjusting for age, smoking and tutionalised US population groups defined and alcohol. Radical/ethnic differences in the risk of examined in two phases between 1988 and 1994. hypertension associated with abdominal obesity Only subjects identified as non-Hispanic white and were determined by comparing blacks with whites non-Hispanic black Americans were eligible for in gender-specific logistic linear regression models this investigation. adjusting for age, smoking and alcohol consump- This study was further confined to 11114 individ- tion. The prevalence of hypertension and abdominal Journal of Human Hypertension Abdominal obesity and hypertension IS Okosun et al 309 obesity were age-adjusted by direct methods using the 1990 US population census data. To estimate the public health consequences of abdominal obesity, we calculated the population attributable fraction percentage (PAF%) of hyperten- sion. The population attributable fraction per cent was estimated28 as: − = PE (OR 1) PAF% + − * 100 1 PE (OR 1) where PE is the proportion of subjects who were abdominally obese, and OR is the odds ratio com- paring subjects who had abdominal obesity with those who did not.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Abdominal Obesity and Cardiovascular Disease
    Advances in Obesity Weight Management & Control Mini Review Open Access Abdominal obesity and cardiovascular disease Abstract Volume 3 Issue 2 - 2015 There is no doubt that obesity has become a major disease in modern times and it Rayan Saleh is definitely associated with cancer, neurodegeneration and heart disease. Scientific Department of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University of studies have resulted in a growing consensus on the way abdominal obesity is Reading, UK associated with inflammation and cardiometabolic risk. Although the gender is a substantial factor of having abdominal fat, there are other protective factors including Correspondence: Rayan Saleh, Registered Dietitian, healthy eating and physical activity. Several techniques are used to assess obesity Department of Food and Nutritional sciences, University of and their utilization depends on their feasibility and economic cost. This research is Reading, White knights, Reading, RG6 6AH, Berkshire, UK, designed to address the important relationship between abdominal obesity and the risk Email rayanesaleh@gmail.com of developing cardiovascular disease. Received: August 19, 2015 | Published: September 15, 2015 Keywords: abdominal obesity, metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease, body shape, inflammation, insulin resistance Abbreviations: WHO, world health organization; T2D, type to hip ratio WHR), bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), Dual 2 diabetes; BMI, body mass index; WC, waist circumference; WHR, energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), Computed tomography (CT) waist
    [Show full text]
  • Metabolic Syndrome: Past, Present and Future
    nutrients Editorial Metabolic Syndrome: Past, Present and Future Isabelle Lemieux 1,* and Jean-Pierre Després 1,2,3 1 Centre de recherche de l’Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec—Université Laval, Québec, QC G1V 4G5, Canada; jean-pierre.despres.ciussscn@ssss.gouv.qc.ca 2 Department of Kinesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada 3 VITAM—Centre de recherche en santé durable, CIUSSS de la Capitale-Nationale, Québec, QC G1J 0A4, Canada * Correspondence: isabelle.lemieux@criucpq.ulaval.ca; Tel.: +1-418-656-8711 (ext. 3603) Received: 28 October 2020; Accepted: 29 October 2020; Published: 14 November 2020 1. Syndrome X: A Tribute to a Pioneer, Gerald M. Reaven Most clinicians and health professionals have heard or read about metabolic syndrome. For instance, as of October 2020, entering “metabolic syndrome” in a PubMed search generated more than 57,000 publications since the introduction of the concept by Grundy and colleagues in 2001 [1]. Although many health professionals are familiar with the five criteria proposed by the National Cholesterol Education Program-Adult Treatment Panel III for its diagnosis (waist circumference, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, blood pressure and glucose), how these variables were selected and the rationale used for the identification of cut-offs remain unclear for many people. In addition, the conceptual definition of metabolic syndrome is often confused with the tools (the five criteria) that have been proposed to make its diagnosis [2,3]. In the seminal paper of his American Diabetes Association 1988 Banting award lecture, Reaven put forward the notion that insulin resistance was not only a fundamental defect increasing the risk of type 2 diabetes, but he also proposed that it was a prevalent cause of cardiovascular disease [4].
    [Show full text]
  • How Strong Is the Association Between Abdominal Obesity and the Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes? International Journal of Clinical Practice, Volume 62 (Number 9)
    Original citation: Freemantle, Nick, Holmes, J. (Jeremy), Hockey, A. and Kumar, Sudhesh. (2008) How strong is the association between abdominal obesity and the incidence of type 2 diabetes? International Journal of Clinical Practice, Volume 62 (Number 9). pp. 1391- 1396. Permanent WRAP url: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/29585 Copyright and reuse: The Warwick Research Archive Portal (WRAP) makes this work of researchers of the University of Warwick available open access under the following conditions. This article is made available under the Creative Commons Attribution- 2.5 Unported (CC BY NC 2.5) license and may be reused according to the conditions of the license. For more details see http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ A note on versions: The version presented in WRAP is the published version, or, version of record, and may be cited as it appears here. For more information, please contact the WRAP Team at: publications@warwick.ac.uk http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/ doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2008.01805.x META-ANALYSIS How strong is the association between abdominal obesity and the incidence of type 2 diabetes? N. Freemantle,1 J. Holmes,2 A. Hockey,3 S. Kumar4 OnlineOpen: This article is available free online at www.blackwell-synergy.com SUMMARY 1School of Primary Care, Review Criteria Occupational and Public Health, Background: Quantitative evidence on the strength of the association between • Comprehensive searches of Medline and Embase University of Birmingham, abdominal obesity and the incidence of type 2 diabetes was assessed. Methods: undertaken in March 2006. Exclusion criteria Birmingham, UK 2 Systematic review of longitudinal studies assessing the relationship between mea- agreed by authors.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 8 Abdominal Obesity and the Metabolic Syndrome
    Chapter 8 Abdominal Obesity and the Metabolic Syndrome Jean-Pierre Desprésa,b, Isabelle Lemieuxa and Natalie Almérasc aQuébec Heart Institute, Hôpital Laval Research Center, Hôpital Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada bDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada cHôpital Laval Research Center, Hôpital Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada 1. INTRODUCTION Despite the fact that the obesity epidemic has received intense media cover- age, many physicians still fail to recognize that the rapidly growing prevalence of type 2 diabetes in their practice is the result of our “toxic” sedentary and affluent lifestyle that promotes weight gain, obesity, a positive energy balance, and the progressive development of a dysmetabolic state [1], potentially lead- ing to glucose intolerance and—eventually—outright hyperglycemia. Citing obesity’s key role in the etiology of type 2 diabetes, Zimmet foresaw a rapid increase in the prevalence of type 2 diabetes worldwide [2, 3]. Unfortunately, the progression of obesity has been so brisk that the worldwide prevalence of type 2 diabetes continues to grow at an alarming rate. This phenomenon should be of great concern to health care providers, as type 2 diabetes has been clearly linked to major health care expenses [4]. Indeed, it is a major cause of retinopa- thy causing blindness, of nephropathy leading to end-stage renal disease and dialysis, as well as of neuropathic complications, which are the leading cause of amputations [5]. In addition to the microcirculatory damage it causes, type 2 diabetes also plays a key role in atherosclerotic macrovascular disease. For in- stance, the majority of type 2 diabetic patients will die from cardiovascular disease [6–8].
    [Show full text]
  • The Link Between Abdominal Obesity and the Metabolic Syndrome
    The Link Between Abdominal Obesity and the Metabolic Syndrome Liza K. Phillips, MBBS (Hons), and Johannes B. Prins, MBBS, PhD, FRACP Corresponding author Johannes B. Prins, MBBS, PhD, FRACP associated metabolic dysfunction [4,5]. A growing body of Diamantina Institute for Cancer, Immunology, and Metabolic literature supports a causal relationship between visceral Medicine, University of Queensland, Princess Alexandra Hospital, obesity and the metabolic syndrome. Level 2, Building 35, Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba 4102, The recognition of fat as an endocrine organ pro- Queensland, Australia. vided an important link between obesity and metabolic E-mail: j.prins@uq.edu.au dysfunction [6]. The past decade has seen increased Current Hypertension Reports 2008, 10:156–164 understanding of the mechanisms by which chronic Current Medicine Group LLC ISSN 1522-6417 Copyright © 2008 by Current Medicine Group LLC inflammation mediates insulin resistance [7]. Adipose tissue secretes so-called adipokines with inflammatory and immune functions. In addition to promoting insulin The clustering of cardiovascular risk factors associated resistance, these adipokines also mediate some cardio- with abdominal obesity is well established. Although vascular complications of obesity (cardiometabolic risk). currently lacking a universal definition, the metabolic Although the adipocyte per se is an important source of syndrome describes a constellation of metabolic abnor- chronic inflammation, other cell types within the adipose malities, including abdominal obesity, and was originally tissue—in particular, macrophages—are also significant introduced to characterize a population at high cardio- [8,9]. Increasing evidence supports the importance of vascular risk. Adipose tissue is a dynamic endocrine the site of excess adiposity. The inflammatory mediators organ that secretes several inflammatory and immune and free fatty acids secreted from the visceral adipose mediators known as adipokines.
    [Show full text]
  • Abdominal Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome: Exercise As Medicine? Carole A
    Paley and Johnson BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation (2018) 10:7 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-018-0097-1 REVIEW Open Access Abdominal obesity and metabolic syndrome: exercise as medicine? Carole A. Paley1,2* and Mark I. Johnson2 Abstract Background: Metabolic syndrome is defined as a cluster of at least three out of five clinical risk factors: abdominal (visceral) obesity, hypertension, elevated serum triglycerides, low serum high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and insulin resistance. It is estimated to affect over 20% of the global adult population. Abdominal (visceral) obesity is thought to be the predominant risk factor for metabolic syndrome and as predictions estimate that 50% of adults will be classified as obese by 2030 it is likely that metabolic syndrome will be a significant problem for health services and a drain on health economies. Evidence shows that regular and consistent exercise reduces abdominal obesity and results in favourable changes in body composition. It has therefore been suggested that exercise is a medicine in its own right and should be prescribed as such. Purpose of this review: This review provides a summary of the current evidence on the pathophysiology of dysfunctional adipose tissue (adiposopathy). It describes the relationship of adiposopathy to metabolic syndrome and how exercise may mediate these processes, and evaluates current evidence on the clinical efficacy of exercise in the management of abdominal obesity. The review also discusses the type and dose of exercise needed for optimal improvements in health status in relation to the available evidence and considers the difficulty in achieving adherence to exercise programmes.
    [Show full text]
  • Abdominal Obesity
    Abdominal obesity Epidemiological studies published over the last 50 years have shed light on the many factors that increase cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Among them, although obesity is generally an acknowledged health hazard and a risk factor for CVD and type 2 diabetes, physicians have long been puzzled by the remarkable heterogeneity seen in clinical practice among individuals with a similar excess of body weight. Some obese patients have no clinical signs of CVD or type 2 diabetes, whereas other patients – who may be only slightly or moderately overweight – have a metabolic profile that predisposes them to CVD and/or type 2 diabetes. Indeed, studies have shown that the risk of CVD and type 2 diabetes does not depend on excess body weight per se, but rather on the location of this excess weight. In light of this, it is now recognized that abdominal obesity (or android obesity, central obesity or upper body obesity) is the form of obesity most likely to be associated with an altered risk factor profile contributing to an increased CVD and type 2 diabetes risk while gynoid obesity (or lower body obesity with fat located around the hips and buttocks) is seldom associated with metabolic complications1. Therefore, it is important to emphasize the importance of abdominal obesity as the form of overweight/obesity most likely to entail the highest risk of CVD and type 2 diabetes. With the development of sophisticated non-invasive imaging techniques such as computed tomography (CT scanners), it has even been possible to clearly distinguish two different depots of abdominal fat: 1- intra-abdominal (visceral) obesity (excess fat in the abdominal cavity) from 2- abdominal subcutaneous fat (the fat located just under the skin) (Figure 1)2.
    [Show full text]
  • Targeting Abdominal Obesity in Diabetes
    2015/06/26 ReVIew Diabetes Management Targeting abdominal obesity in diabetes Thinzar Min1 & Jeffrey Wayne Stephens*,1 Practice points ● Abdominal obesity is generally defined by waist circumference. ● Ethnic specific cut-off values for waist circumference exist. Min & Stephens ● Abdominal obesity is strongly associated with insulin resistance. ● Abdominal obesity is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease, Type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome. 301 ● Waist circumference is a better predictive measure than BMI, in identifying obesity related morbidity and mortality. ● Lifestyle interventions: healthy balanced diet, increasing physical activity is key to preventing obesity epidemic. 309 ● Pharmacological intervention has limited role. 10.2217/ ● Surgical intervention: bariatric surgery has become a recommended treatment option for super obese individuals. DMT.15.14 Bariatric surgery has additional metabolic benefit such as remission of Type 2 diabetes. © 2015 FUTURE MEDICINE Ltd SUmmARy Over recent years, there has been a better understanding of the role of that visceral adipose tissue plays in the pathogenesis of insulin resistance, Type 2 diabetes and the metabolic syndrome. Studies have consistently demonstrated that intra-abdominal fat Targeting abdominal accumulation, in other words, abdominal obesity is independently associated with Type obesity in diabetes 2 diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and the metabolic syndrome. Furthermore, evidence supports the view that visceral adipose tissue is more closely associated with obesity related co-morbidities and mortality, compared with 5 the total body adipose tissue (subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue). The management of abdominal obesity involves a multidisciplinary team approach. Active healthy life style is a key in preventing obesity epidemic. Surgical intervention has become part of obesity treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • General and Abdominal Obesity and Incident Distal Sensorimotor
    240 Diabetes Care Volume 42, February 2019 SabrinaSchlesinger,1,2 ChristianHerder,2,3,4 General and Abdominal Obesity Julia M. Kannenberg,2,3 Cornelia Huth,2,5 Maren Carstensen-Kirberg,2,3 and Incident Distal Sensorimotor Wolfgang Rathmann,1,2,4 Gidon J. Bonhof,¨ 3 Wolfgang Koenig,6,7,8 Margit Heier,5 Polyneuropathy: Insights Into Annette Peters,2,5 Christa Meisinger,5,9 fl Michael Roden,2,3,10 Barbara Thorand,2,5 In ammatory Biomarkers as and Dan Ziegler2,3,10 Potential Mediators in the KORA F4/FF4 Cohort Diabetes Care 2019;42:240–247 | https://doi.org/10.2337/dc18-1842 1Institute for Biometrics and Epidemiology, German Diabetes Center, Leibniz Center for Di- abetes Research at Heinrich Heine University OBJECTIVE Dusseldorf,¨ Dusseldorf,¨ Germany 2 To investigate the associations between different anthropometric measurements German Center for Diabetes Research, Munchen-Neuherberg,¨ Germany and development of distal sensorimotor polyneuropathy (DSPN) considering 3Institute for Clinical Diabetology, German Di- fl EPIDEMIOLOGY/HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH interaction effects with prediabetes/diabetes and to evaluate subclinical in am- abetes Center, Leibniz Center for Diabetes Re- mation as a potential mediator. search at Heinrich Heine University Dusseldorf,¨ Dusseldorf,¨ Germany RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS 4Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Dusseldorf,¨ Dusseldorf,¨ Germany This study was conducted among 513 participants from the Cooperative Health 5Institute of Epidemiology, Helmholtz Zentrum Research in the Region of Augsburg (KORA) F4/FF4 cohort (aged 62–81 years). Munchen,¨ German Research Center for Environ- Anthropometry was measured at baseline. Incident DSPN was defined by neu- mental Health, Neuherberg, Germany 6 ropathic impairments using the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument at Deutsches Herzzentrum Munchen,¨ Technische Universitat¨ Munchen,¨ Munich, Germany baseline and follow-up.
    [Show full text]
  • Abdominal Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes
    Diabetes and Lifestyle Abdominal Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes a report by Dragan Micic 1 and Goran Cvijovic 2 1. Head; 2. Specialist in Internal Medicine, Department of Metabolic Disorders in Endocrinology, Institute of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Diseases of Metabolism, Clinical Centre of Serbia DOI:10.17925/EE.2008.04.00.26 Epidemiology body fat is not the only source of adverse health complications of obesity; Recent statistics from the World Health Organization (WHO) indicate that in fact, fat distribution and the relative portion of lipids in various insulin- in 2005 approximately 1.6 billion adults (aged 15 years and over) were sensitive tissues (skeletal muscle and liver), which affects their normal overweight worldwide, while at least 400 million adults were obese. metabolic pathways, actually determine metabolic risk.10 Accumulation of Furthermore, the WHO predicts that by 2015 approximately intra-abdominal or visceral fat is associated with insulin resistance and is 2.3 billion adults will be overweight and more than 700 million will be a major feature of metabolic syndrome, which confers a 1.5–2-fold obese.1 At the same time, diabetes currently affects 246 million people increased risk of developing diabetes and cardiovascular disease (CVD).11 worldwide. It is expected to affect 380 million by 2025, with the largest increases in diabetes prevalence in developing countries; most of the Abdominal obesity as a clinical feature of excessive accumulation of visceral cases will be type 2 diabetes.2,3 fat is usually associated with a cluster of cardiovascular risk factors, defined by the WHO as ‘metabolic syndrome’.
    [Show full text]
  • 821.Full-Text.Pdf
    Diabetes Care Volume 37, March 2014 821 Structural and Functional Kyriakoula Marinou,1,2 Leanne Hodson,1 Senthil K. Vasan,1,3 Barbara A. Fielding,1,4 Properties of Deep Abdominal Rajarshi Banerjee,5 Kerstin Brismar,3 Michael Koutsilieris,2 Anne Clark,1 Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue Matt J. Neville,1,6 and Fredrik Karpe1,6 Explain Its Association With Insulin Resistance and Cardiovascular Risk in Men OBJECTIVE Fat distribution is an important variable explaining metabolic heterogeneity of obesity. Abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) is divided by the Scarpa’s fascia into a deep subcutaneous adipose tissue (dSAT) and a superficial subcuta- neous adipose tissue (sSAT) layer. This study sought to characterize functional differences between the two SAT layers to explore their relative contribution to metabolic traits and cardiovascular risk (CVR) profile. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS 1Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology, and We recruited 371 Caucasians consecutively from a local random, population- Metabolism, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom based screening project in Oxford and 25 Asian Indians from the local community. 2 Department of Experimental Physiology, Athens CARDIOVASCULAR AND METABOLIC RISK The depth of the SAT layers was determined by ultrasound (US), and adipose University School of Medicine, Athens, Greece tissue (AT) biopsies were performed under US guidance in a subgroup of 43 3Department of Molecular Medicine and Caucasians. Visceral adipose tissue (VAT) mass was quantified by dual-energy Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, X-ray absorptiometry scan. Sweden 4Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, RESULTS University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom 5Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Male adiposity in both ethnic groups was characterized by a disproportionate Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, expansion of dSAT, which was strongly correlated with VAT mass.
    [Show full text]
  • Prevalence of Prediabetes and Abdominal Obesity Among Healthy-Weight Adults: 18-Year Trend
    Prevalence of Prediabetes and Abdominal Obesity Among Healthy-Weight Adults: 18-Year Trend 1,2 Arch G. Mainous III, PhD ABSTRACT 1 Rebecca J. Tanner, MA PURPOSE Trends in sedentary lifestyle may have influenced adult body composi- Ara Jo, MS1 tion and metabolic health among individuals at presumably healthy weights. This study examines the nationally representative prevalence of prediabetes and 3 Stephen D. Anton, PhD abdominal obesity among healthy-weight adults in 1988 through 2012. 1Department of Health Services Research, METHODS We analyzed the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Management, and Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida (NHANES) III (1988-1994) and NHANES for the years 1999 to 2012, focusing on adults aged 20 years and older who have a body mass index (BMI) of 18.5 to 2 Department of Community Health and 24.99 and do not have diabetes, either diagnosed or undiagnosed. We defined Family Medicine, University of Florida, prediabetes using glycated hemoglobin (HbA ) level ranges from 5.7% to 6.4%, Gainesville, Florida 1c as specified by the American Diabetes Association. Abdominal obesity was mea- 3Department of Aging and Geriatric sured by waist circumference and waist-to-height ratio. Research, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida RESULTS The prevalence of prediabetes among healthy-weight adults, aged 20 years and older and without diagnosed or undiagnosed diabetes, increased from 10.2% in 1988-1994 to 18.5% in 2012. Among individuals aged 45 years and older, the prevalence of prediabetes increased from 22.0% to 33.1%. The per- centage of adults aged 20 years and older with an unhealthy waist circumference increased from 5.6% in 1988-1994 to 7.6% in 2012.
    [Show full text]