DOCSLIB.ORG

Sponsorship and Cosponsorship of Senate Bills

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sponsorship and Cosponsorship of Senate Bills Sponsorship and Cosponsorship of Senate Bills Updated February 5, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov 98-279 Sponsorship and Cosponsorship of Senate Bills Senator who introduces a bill or resolution in the Senate is called its sponsor. Several Senators together may introduce a measure, but only the Senator whose name appears first on the bill is considered its sponsor; the others are cosponsors. A bill can have only A one sponsor, but there is no limit on the number of cosponsors it may have.1 Sponsorship of a Bill At the beginning of each new Congress, the Senate traditionally adopts a standing order allowing Senators to introduce bills and resolutions at any time the chamber is in session by presenting them to the bill clerk seated at the desk on the Senate floor.2 Most measures are introduced in this fashion. Senators may also introduce measures from the floor as part of “morning business” under Rule VII. In practice, however, morning business seldom occurs as provided in Rule VII. Instead, on most days, the Senate arranges by unanimous consent for a period of morning business to occur at some later point. Senators may introduce measures from the floor during this period. 3 Senators typically sponsor bills they support. A Senator may introduce a bill as a courtesy, such as legislation proposed by the President, in which case the bill would be designated in the Congressional Record as having been introduced “by request.” A Senator may also introduce legislation on behalf of another Senator without having to assume sponsorship themselves.4 Once a bill has been handed to the clerk, it becomes the property of the Senate and cannot be withdrawn. A bill sponsored by a Senator who has since departed the chamber can still be acted upon by the Senate. The text of a departed Senator’s bill also may be introduced as a new bill with a sitting Senator identified as its sponsor. Some bills become popularly associated with the names of two or more Senators; for instance, the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Deficit Control Act of 1985, the Kennedy-Kassebaum Health Insurance Act of 1995, or the McCain-Feingold Campaign Reform Act of 2002. Although these popular associations may suggest otherwise, Senate rules do not allow a bill to have multiple sponsors. Even still, the strategy of associating legislation with the names of two or more Senators can be useful in gaining support across partisan or ideological ranks. As Senator Ted Kennedy (D-MA) explained: “When Strom [Thurmond] and I introduce a bill together, it is either an idea whose time has come, or one of us has not read the bill.”5 A “Kennedy-Thurmond” bill would have conveyed a clear signal that the measure enjoyed support from across the ideological spectrum. Most measures are introduced by individual Senators, but Senate committees may also report an “original” bill for chamber consideration. As Senate Rule XXV states, standing committees have “leave to report by bill or otherwise on matters within their respective jurisdictions.” The relevant committee chair is generally considered the sponsor in these instances, although the measure is 1 Congressional Record, vol. 50, part 6, (October 27, 1913), p. 5798. 2 Congressional Record, daily edition, vol. 167 (January 3, 2021), p. S8. 3 For further information on bill introduction, see CRS Report R44195, Introducing a Senate Bill or Resolution, by Mark J. Oleszek. 4 In these cases, the bill will appear in the Congressional Record as having been introduced by one Senator for another Senator. For instance, on January 4, 2017, Minority Leader Charles Schumer introduced S. 30 on behalf of Senator Feinstein, who sponsored the bill. See Congressional Record, daily edition, vol. 163 (January 4, 2017), p. S59. 5 Quoted in Walter Oleszek, Roger Davidson, Eric Schickler, and Frances Lee, Congress and Its Members, 16th ed. (Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2017), p. 221. Congressional Research Service 1 Sponsorship and Cosponsorship of Senate Bills perhaps best understood as a product that incorporates views and input from other committee members as well.6 Original bills may not have cosponsors. Cosponsorship of a Bill When Senators introduce bills, they commonly attach a form listing the names of cosponsors.7 Cosponsorship is generally understood to signify a Senator’s support for the proposal. Prior to introduction, Senators may cosponsor a measure by contacting the office of the sponsor and requesting that their names be included on the bill or resolution. Initial (or “original”) cosponsors can be added until the measure is presented to the bill clerk on the floor of the Senate chamber. Thereafter, unanimous consent is required to include additional cosponsors on the measure.8 A Senator may offer this request when recognized on the Senate floor, or, alternatively, deliver to the cloakroom a cosponsorship form that bears an original signature of the Senator requesting to be added as a cosponsor. The names of additional cosponsors will appear on the printed version of the bill only if there is a subsequent printing of it. Under regulations set forth by the Joint Committee on Printing, a bill cannot be reprinted solely for the purpose of adding cosponsors (even by unanimous consent).9 A current list of cosponsors may be identified through a search of Congress.gov, an online database of legislative activity, or the Congressional Record.10 Supporters of a bill often seek cosponsors to demonstrate its level of support among Senators. One of the most common techniques to attract cosponsors is the “Dear Colleague” letter, a notice delivered to some or all Senate offices either in print or by email soliciting support for the bill. These letters typically explain the issue or problem the legislation seeks to address, the key policy elements it contains, and the likely impact it would have if passed into law. Contact information of a staff aide is usually included for the benefit of Senate offices interested in cosponsoring the measure. No Senate rules or any formal procedures govern “Dear Colleague” letters. They are, in effect, advertisements for the sponsoring Senator’s legislation.11 6 Technically speaking, an original bill is not considered to have a sponsor under Senate rules. When an original bill is reported and a final draft is printed, a Senator (usually the chair) will deliver the final draft to the bill clerk’s desk on the chamber floor where it will be assigned a bill number and placed on the calendar. The name of the Senator who brought the legislation forward will be indicated on the bill, but this indication is not tantamount to sponsorship. For instance, the Senate Committee on Armed Services reported an original bill (S. 1519) in July 2017 authorizing appropriations for the U.S. military and the Department of Defense. The text of S. 1519 was drafted, marked up, and reported by the committee. Because it was the chair of the Armed Services Committee who presented the legislation to the bill clerk, the bill indicated, “Mr. McCain, from the Committee on Armed Services, reported the following original bill.” Under Senate rules, however, Senator McCain did not sponsor the bill. 7 Cosponsorship forms are available for download in portable document format (PDF) at http://webster.senate.gov. This form may be used either to add or subtract cosponsors of bills, resolutions, and amendments. 8 After a bill has been introduced it requires unanimous consent to remove a Senator as a cosponsor, and either the sponsor or a cosponsor may make this request. Proceedings to this effect can be found in the Congressional Record, vol. 153, part 1 (May 2, 2007), p. S5493. 9 Congressional Record, vol. 97, part 2 (March 21, 1951), p. 2723. 10 Available at http://congress.gov. Cosponsors who are added to a bill after its introduction will appear in the Congressional Record under the heading “Additional Cosponsors.” 11 For further information, see CRS Report R44768, “Dear Colleague” Letters in the House of Representatives: Past Practices and Issues for Congress, by Jacob R. Straus. Congressional Research Service 2 Sponsorship and Cosponsorship of Senate Bills On the day a measure is introduced, the sponsor may direct the clerk to hold the bill at the desk for the purpose of collecting cosponsors prior to its referral to committee. To hold a bill at the desk beyond the date of its introduction requires the unanimous consent of the Senate.12 The connection between cosponsorship and legislative outcomes has been the subject of considerable scholarly research. Much of the empirical work in this area suggests that cosponsorship has a positive but limited impact on a bill’s prospects for final passage. As one prominent study concluded: [C]osponsorship matters for legislative success, but only barely. Significant effects due to cosponsorship crop up at different stages of the legislative process. When bills are referenced to a committee, bills with cosponsors are more likely than bills with no cosponsors to receive some consideration. Likewise, cosponsored bills are more likely to make it out of committee, however, the impact of cosponsorship is slight. It has even less impact on the final passage of bills.13 Decisions to cosponsor legislation can be made for a variety of reasons, some of which might be unrelated to the text of the bill itself. As such, cosponsoring a bill should not be equated with a vote for final passage. In some cases the text of a measure might have been amended following its introduction in ways a cosponsor can no longer support. In addition, Senate norms of behavior have long emphasized collegiality and deference to one’s colleagues, and some Senators may view cosponsorship as the legislative equivalent of a common courtesy.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Setting Course: a Congressional Management Guide
    SETTING COURSE SETTING “The best thing a new Member and his or her staff can do is to sit down and read Setting Course cover to cover. It’s a book that has stood the test of time.” —House Chief of Staff SETTING “Setting Course is written as if you were having a conversation with someone who has been on Capitol Hill for 50 years and knows how things work.” —Senate Office Manager COURSE SETTING COURSE, now in its 17th edition for the 117th Congress, is a comprehensive guide to managing a congressional office. Part I is for Members-elect and freshman offices, focusing on the tasks that are most critical to a successful transition to Congress and setting up a new office. Part II focuses on defining the Member’s role — in the office and in Congress. Part III provides guidance to both freshman and veteran Members and staff on managing office operations. Setting Course is the signature publication of the Congressional Management Foundation MANAGEMENT GUIDE CONGRESSIONAL A and has been funded by grants from: Deborah Szekely A CONGRESSIONAL MANAGEMENT GUIDE THE CONGRESSIONAL MANAGEMENT FOUNDATION (CMF) is a 501(c)(3) nonpartisan nonprofit whose mission is to build EDITION FOR THE trust and effectiveness in Congress. We do this by enhancing the 117th performance of the institution, legislators and their staffs through CONGRESS research-based education and training, and by strengthening the CONGRESS bridge between Congress and the People it serves. Since 1977 CMF 117th has worked internally with Member, committee, leadership, and institutional offices in the House and Senate to identify and disseminate best practices for management, workplace environment, SPONSORED BY communications, and constituent services.
    [Show full text]
  • Case 1:19-Cv-01974-TNM Document 113 Filed 08/04/21 Page 1 of 37
    Case 1:19-cv-01974-TNM Document 113 Filed 08/04/21 Page 1 of 37 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS, UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Plaintiff–Counterdefendant, No. 1:19-cv-1974-TNM v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY; INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE; JANET YELLEN, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Treasury; and CHARLES P. RETTIG, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, Defendants–Crossdefendants, and DONALD J. TRUMP; THE DONALD J. TRUMP REVOCABLE TRUST; DJT HOLDINGS LLC; DJT HOLDINGS MANAGING MEMBER LLC; DTTM OPERATIONS LLC; DTTM OPERATIONS MANAGING MEMBER CORP.; LFB ACQUISITION MEMBER CORP.; LFB ACQUISITION LLC; and LAMINGTON FARM CLUB, LLC d/b/a TRUMP NATIONAL GOLF CLUB-BEDMINSTER Intervenors–Counterclaimants– Crossclaimants. ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIMS/CROSS-CLAIMS Intervenors—Donald J. Trump, The Donald J. Trump Revocable Trust, DJT Holdings LLC, DJT Holdings Managing Member LLC, DTTM Operations LLC, DTTM Operations Managing Member Corp, LFB Acquisition Member Corp., LFB Acquisition LLC, and Lamington Farm Club, LLC d/b/a Trump National Golf Club-Bedminster—respectfully submit this responsive pleading pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12 and 24(c). 1 Case 1:19-cv-01974-TNM Document 113 Filed 08/04/21 Page 2 of 37 ANSWER 1. Intervenors deny that the Committee’s requests are valid oversight requests or that they are entitled to any relief. Intervenors admit the rest. 2. The text of Section 6103(f) speaks for itself. Intervenors admit that Congress enacted the Revenue Act of 1924 in 1924.
    [Show full text]
  • CONGRESSIONAL RECORD—SENATE, Vol. 151, Pt. 8 May 24, 2005 and So out Into the Road the Three the Two Older Villains Did As They Had Mr
    May 24, 2005 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD—SENATE, Vol. 151, Pt. 8 10929 Leahy Obama Snowe state, to calm the dangerous seas vice, but here it is. And by considering Lieberman Pryor Specter Lott Reid Stevens which, from time to time, threaten to that advice, it only stands to reason Lugar Roberts Sununu dash our Republic against rocky shoals that any President will be more as- Martinez Rockefeller Talent and jagged shores. sured that his nominees will enjoy a McCain Salazar Thomas The Senate proved it to be true again kinder reception in the Senate. McConnell Santorum Thune Mikulski Schumer Vitter yesterday, when 14 Members—from The agreement, which references the Murkowski Sessions Voinovich both sides of the aisle, Republicans and need for ‘‘advice and consent,’’ as con- Nelson (FL) Shelby Warner Democrats; 14 Members—of this re- tained in the Constitution, proves once Nelson (NE) Smith (OR) Wyden vered institution came together to again, as has been true for over 200 NAYS—18 avert the disaster referred to as the years, that our revered Constitution is Biden Dorgan Levin ‘‘nuclear option’’ or the ‘‘constitu- not simply a dry piece of parchment. It Boxer Feingold Lincoln tional option’’—these men and women is a living document. Cantwell Jeffords Murray of great courage. Yesterday’s agreement was a real-life Corzine Kennedy Reed illustration of how this historical docu- Dayton Kerry Sarbanes As William Gladstone said, in refer- Dodd Lautenberg Stabenow ring to the Senate of the United ment continues to be vital in our daily lives. It inspires, it teaches, and yester- NOT VOTING—1 States, the Senate is that remarkable body, the most remarkable day it helped the country and the Sen- Inouye of all the inventions of modern politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Congress's Contempt Power: Law, History, Practice, and Procedure
    Congress’s Contempt Power and the Enforcement of Congressional Subpoenas: Law, History, Practice, and Procedure Todd Garvey Legislative Attorney May 12, 2017 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL34097 Congress’s Contempt Power and the Enforcement of Congressional Subpoenas Summary Congress’s contempt power is the means by which Congress responds to certain acts that in its view obstruct the legislative process. Contempt may be used either to coerce compliance, to punish the contemnor, and/or to remove the obstruction. Although arguably any action that directly obstructs the effort of Congress to exercise its constitutional powers may constitute a contempt, in recent times the contempt power has most often been employed in response to non- compliance with a duly issued congressional subpoena—whether in the form of a refusal to appear before a committee for purposes of providing testimony, or a refusal to produce requested documents. Congress has three formal methods by which it can combat non-compliance with a duly issued subpoena. Each of these methods invokes the authority of a separate branch of government. First, the long dormant inherent contempt power permits Congress to rely on its own constitutional authority to detain and imprison a contemnor until the individual complies with congressional demands. Second, the criminal contempt statute permits Congress to certify a contempt citation to the executive branch for the criminal prosecution of the contemnor. Finally, Congress may rely on the judicial branch to enforce a congressional subpoena. Under this procedure, Congress may seek a civil judgment from a federal court declaring that the individual in question is legally obligated to comply with the congressional subpoena.
    [Show full text]
  • Appointment of a Senator to the Chair 2 Rule Ii
    Senate of the United States Table of Contents RULE I. APPOINTMENT OF A SENATOR TO THE CHAIR 2 RULE II. PRESENTATION OF CREDENTIALS AND QUESTIONS OF PRIVILEGE 2 RULE III. OATHS 3 RULE IV. COMMENCEMENT OF DAILY SESSIONS 3 RULE V. SUSPENSION AND AMENDMENT OF THE RULES 3 RULE VI. QUORUM - ABSENT SENATORS MAY BE SENT FOR 3 RULE VII. MORNING BUSINESS 4 RULE VIII. MESSAGES 4 RULE IX. SPECIAL ORDERS 4 RULE X. VOTING PROCEDURE 4 RULE XI. RECONSIDERATION 5 RULE XII. JOINT RESOLUTIONS, RESOLUTIONS, AND PREAMBLES THERETO 5 RULE XIII. AMENDMENTS AND MOTIONS 5 RULE XIV. REFERENCE TO COMMITTEES; MOTIONS TO DISCHARGE; REPORTS OF COMMITTEES; AND HEARINGS AVAILABLE 6 RULE XV. DEBATE 7 RULE XVI. QUESTIONS OF ORDER 7 RULE XVII. SESSION WITH CLOSED DOORS 8 XVIII. PRECEDENCE OF MOTIONS 8 RULE XIX. PRIVILEGE OF THE FLOOR 9 RULE XX. STANDING COMMITTEES 9 RULE XXI. COMMITTEE PROCEDURE 12 RULE XXII. CONFERENCE COMMITTEES; REPORTS; OPEN MEETINGS 13 RULE XXIII. EXECUTIVE SESSIONS 15 RULE XXIV. EXECUTIVE SESSION - PROCEEDINGS ON TREATIES 16 RULE XXV. EXECUTIVE SESSION - PROCEEDINGS ON NOMINATIONS 16 RULE XXVI. SENATE CHAMBER 17 RULE XXVII. CONFLICT OF INTEREST 17 Page 1 of 17 Senate of the United States RULE I. APPOINTMENT OF A SENATOR TO THE CHAIR 1. In the absence of the Vice President, the Senate shall choose a President pro tempore, who shall hold the office and execute the duties thereof during the pleasure of the Senate and until another is elected or his term of office as a Senator expires. 2. The President pro tempore shall have the right to name in open Senate or, if absent, in writing, a Senator to perform the duties of the Chair, including the signing of duly enrolled bills and joint resolutions but such substitution shall not extend beyond an adjournment, except by unanimous consent; and the Senator so named shall have the right to name in open session, or, if absent, in writing, a Senator to perform the duties of the Chair, but not to extend beyond an adjournment, except by unanimous consent.
    [Show full text]
  • House Committees Release Guidance for Transportation Earmarks
    INSIGHTi House Committees Release Guidance for Transportation Earmarks April 8, 2021 The House Committee on Appropriations and Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure have separately announced that individual Members may request funding for specific transportation projects. This ends an effective ban on earmarks that has been in force in the House since 2011. This Insight summarizes the new rules applicable to Member-designated transportation projects and points out certain matters that appear to remain unclear. A congressional designation, the formal term for an earmark, is a provision in a law or report language that has four basic attributes. It is included at the request of a Member, Delegate, Commissioner, or Senator; recommends a specific amount of discretionary budget authority, credit authority, or other budget authority; is for an identifiable entity or targeted to a state, locality, or congressional district; and is not awarded through a statutory or administrative formula-driven or competitive award process. Earmarks in transportation appropriations bills and surface transportation authorizations have some differences that Member offices should be aware of as they organize, select, and advance their earmark requests. Appropriations bills occur annually, so Members could have opportunities to submit earmark requests each year. Surface transportation bills typically authorize spending for five or six years, so earmarking opportunities occur less often. Transportation Appropriations Community Project Funding In a February 26, 2021, press release, the House Appropriations Committee announced that for FY2022, Members may submit up to 10 requests for Community Project Funding across all the appropriations bills. The total amount available for designation is limited to 1% of discretionary spending.
    [Show full text]
  • The Senate "Two-Hour Rule"
    The Senate “Two-Hour Rule” Governing Committee Meeting Times Christopher M. Davis Analyst on Congress and the Legislative Process Michael Greene Senior Research Librarian April 20, 2018 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R45170 The Senate “Two-Hour Rule” Governing Committee Meeting Times Summary Paragraph 5(a) of Senate Rule XXVI, sometimes referred to as the “two-hour rule,” restricts the times that most Senate committees and subcommittees can meet when the full Senate is in session. The rule is intended to help balance the Senate’s committee and floor work and to minimize the logistical conflicts that Senators face between participating in committee hearings and markups and attending to their duties on the chamber floor. Under the terms of the rule, no Senate committee or subcommittee (except the Committees on Appropriations and Budget and their subcommittees) can meet after the Senate has been in session for two hours or past 2:00 p.m. unless one of the following things occur: (1) the Senate grants unanimous consent for them to meet; (2) both the majority and minority leaders (or their designees) agree to permit the meeting, and their agreement has been announced on the Senate floor; or (3) the Senate adopts a privileged motion to allow the meeting. Should a committee meet during a restricted time period without being granted permission, any action that it takes—such as ordering a bill or nomination reported to the Senate—is considered “null, void, and of no effect.” Senate rules restricting committee meeting times have existed for over 70 years and have evolved over time.
    [Show full text]
  • Congress's Contempt Power: a Sketch
    Order Code RL34114 Congress’s Contempt Power: A Sketch August 1, 2007 Morton Rosenberg Specialist in American Public Law American Law Division Todd B. Tatelman Legislative Attorney American Law Division Congress’s Contempt Power: A Sketch Summary Congress’s contempt power is the means by which Congress responds to certain acts that in its view obstruct the legislative process. Contempt may be used either to coerce compliance (inherent contempt), punish the contemnor (criminal contempt), and/or to remove the obstruction (civil contempt). Although arguably any action that directly obstructs the effort of Congress to exercise its constitutional powers may constitute a contempt, in the last seventy years the contempt power (primarily through the criminal contempt process) has generally been employed only in instances of refusals of witnesses to appear before committees, to respond to questions, or to produce documents. This report outlines the source of the contempt power, reviews major developments in the case law, and analyzes the procedures associated with each of the three different types of contempt proceedings. A more fully developed and detailed version, complete with sources and references, can be found in CRS Report RL34097, Congress’s Contempt Power: Law, History, Practice, and Procedure, by Morton Rosenberg and Todd B. Tatelman. Contents Congress’s Power to Investigate ..................................1 Early History of Congressional Contempt...........................3 Inherent Contempt.............................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Senate the Senate Met at 9:30 A.M
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 109 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 152 WASHINGTON, WEDNESDAY, JUNE 14, 2006 No. 76 Senate The Senate met at 9:30 a.m. and was under the control of the minority and serving for 47 years in this institution called to order by the President pro the final 15 minutes under the control is certainly remarkable, what he has tempore (Mr. STEVENS). of the majority. Following morning done during those 47 years is what is business, we will resume consideration truly remarkable. His contribution to PRAYER of the emergency supplemental appro- the public discourse and debate of our The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- priations conference report. Under the country throughout that time has been fered the following prayer: time agreement that was reached yes- truly exemplary. Let us pray. terday, we have a little over an hour I noted the other day, in fact, that Lord of truth and love, source and and a half of debate this morning. The when Senator BYRD was first elected to end of our believing and loving, You vote on the adoption of the conference the House, there was a wonderful pic- alone are worthy of our praise and we report is set for tomorrow at 10 a.m. ture taken that appeared with Senator celebrate Your great Name. Thank You Today we will continue work on the BYRD and several other Members of for the gift of Your dynamic presence Department of Defense authorization newly minted Congressmen who had in our lives and for the power we re- bill.
    [Show full text]
  • Amending Senate Rules at the Start of a New Congress, 1953-1975: an Analysis with an Afterword to 2015
    Amending Senate Rules at the Start of a New Congress, 1953-1975: An Analysis with an Afterword to 2015 (name redacted) Senior Specialist in American National Government February 23, 2016 Congressional Research Service 7-.... www.crs.gov R44395 Amending Senate Rules at the Start of a New Congress Summary The filibuster (extended debate) is the Senate’s most well-known procedure. Hollywood even highlighted its use in a famous 1939 movie entitled Mr. Smith Goes to Washington, starring actor Jimmy Stewart in the title role of Senator Jefferson Smith. Lengthy debate has many virtues (informing the public, for example) but the blocking potential of interminable debate has often made the filibuster a target for change by reform-minded Senators. Rule XXII requires 60 votes of Senators duly chosen and sworn to end debate on measures or motions—“except on a measure or motion to amend the Senate rules, in which case the necessary affirmative vote shall be two- thirds of the Senators present and voting.” Real or threatened filibusters, along with cloture motions, have increased in recent Congresses. One consequence has been unsuccessful efforts by change-oriented Senators to amend Rule XXII without having to overcome the two-thirds supermajority hurdle. The contention of the reformers is that at the start of a new Congress, the Senate can amend its rules by majority vote—as the House does on its first day. They cite the U.S. Constitution (Article I, Section 5) as authority for their claim: “Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings,” which implicitly means by majority vote, state the reformers.
    [Show full text]
  • SBTC Congressional Visit Manual Treasurer Virtual Meetings Via Computer Or Phone Are Encouraged Until the Pandemic Is Under Control and Restrictions Are Lifted
    1156 15th St NW Suite 502 Washington, DC 20005 www.sbtc.org Robert Schmidt Kevin Burns Co-Chairmen Jere Glover Executive Director *2020 note: due to the restrictions imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic, in-person meetings with congressional offices are discouraged, and in some cases prohibited. Larry Nannis SBTC Congressional Visit Manual Treasurer Virtual meetings via computer or phone are encouraged until the pandemic is under control and restrictions are lifted. Matt Oristano Mid-Atlantic Regional Chair Ash Thakker How to schedule a meeting with your Congressional Office Southeast Regional Chair The first question you should ask is if it makes more sense to meet in the member of Congress’s Mary Delahunty Southwest district office or their Washington office. Getting a meeting in a district office is usually easier, Regional Chair and makes more sense if your issue is related to casework, rather than policy. If you are trying Russ Farmer to organize a visit from your member of Congress to your company site, it also makes more Mountain sense to coordinate through their district office. Regional Chair Michael Browne On the other hand, if you want to discuss policy, promote or oppose a specific piece of Pacific Regional Chair legislation, or have a meet-and-greet with the member of Congress, you’ll want to work through the Washington office. But even in that case, your local district office can help coordinate and Roy Keller State Liaison network you with the correct staffer in your member’s Washington office. Paul Donovan Michael Squillante By phone NIH Committee Co-Chairs You can find the main office phone number for your member of Congress’s Washington and Ash Thakker district offices, usually listed under “contacts”.
    [Show full text]
  • The Legislative Process in Texas the Legislative Process in Texas
    The Legislative Process in Texas The Legislative Process in Texas Published by the Texas Legislative Council February 2021 Texas Legislative Council Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick, Joint Chair Speaker Dade Phelan, Joint Chair Jeff Archer, Executive Director The mission of the Texas Legislative Council is to provide professional, nonpartisan service and support to the Texas Legislature and legislative agencies. In every area of responsibility, we strive for quality and efficiency. During previous legislative sessions, the information in this publication was published as part of the Guide to Texas Legislative Information. Copies of this publication have been distributed in compliance with the state depository law (Subchapter G, Chapter 441, Government Code) and are available for public use through the Texas State Publications Depository Program at the Texas State Library and other state depository libraries. This publication can be found at https://www.tlc.texas.gov/publications. Additional copies of this publication may be obtained from the council: By mail: P.O. Box 12128, Austin, TX 78711-2128 By phone: (512) 463-1144 By e-mail: [email protected] By online request form (legislative offices only): https://bilreq/House.aspx If you have questions or comments regarding this publication, please contact Kellie Smith by phone at (512) 463-1155 or by e-mail at [email protected]. Table of Contents HOW A BILL ORIGINATES. .1 INTRODUCING A BILL . 1 THE ROLE OF COMMITTEES. .2 REFERRAL TO A COMMITTEE. 2 COMMITTEE MEETINGS. 2 COMMITTEE REPORTS . .3 HOUSE CALENDARS AND LIST OF ITEMS ELIGIBLE FOR CONSIDERATION. 4 SENATE REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS AND INTENT CALENDAR.
    [Show full text]