Telling the Truth Through False Teeth by Rossana Tich

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Telling the Truth Through False Teeth by Rossana Tich At the Heart of Hackney since 1967 2012 THE HACKNEY SOCIETY SPACENews and views about Hackney’s builtS environment Issue 37 Summer 2012 // ISSN 2047-7457 Telling the Truth through False Teeth By Rossana Tich Over the past few months, a mid- Alex Chinneck believes, ‘These factories 20th-century factory, earmarked may be industrially redundant, but I think it for demolition, on Tudor Road, E9 is important to preserve them and recognise the architectural contribution they make has slowly and painstakingly been installation period I have heard many different to London’s eclectic skyline and streets. It transformed into a work of art by Alex interpretations of what the work means and seems odd that we tear down structures that Chinneck in association with Sumarria why I have done it. Everyone is welcome to have been built to last.’ Lunn Gallery. People passing by have interpret the intervention in their own way; I been doing a double take, realising In total 312 panes from 13 windows have just hope they enjoy it.’ been replaced with 1,248 pieces of glass – that the original broken windows had Telling the Truth Through False Teeth four pieces form the perfect break in every been replaced with … broken windows, Artist: Alex Chinneck (http://www. pane. The familiar is made unfamiliar by the albeit 312 identically smashed panes. alexchinneck.com/) in association with repetition and exactness of the work – the Sumarria Lunn Gallery. Location: corner The site was once a shoe factory and most combination of engineering and accident of Mare Street and Tudor Road, Hackney, recently a cannabis factory! Chinneck spent a completes the illusion. ‘This brilliant use E9 7FE. Installation on view: until at least gruelling four months removing the remnants: of broken glass is a witty way of both September 2012. piles of soil, wires, grow bags, water underlining the building’s being allowed to tanks, plant pots and heat lamps. Planning get run down – the broken windows - and contents permission has been sought over the years highlighting how good it could look if it had 01 Telling the Truth through False Teeth to demolish the factory and replace it with been well looked after.’ (Nichola Schild, a hotel (part of a larger scheme) but the local resident) 02 Building Watch: Leyton Marsh latest plans are for a residential block. The 03 Building Watch: 86-100 Mare Street Central and South Hackney Conservation Alex Chinneck, who lives in Hackney, was 03 Building Watch: Queen Elizabeth Areas Advisory Committee has been born in 1984 and is a graduate of the Hospital commenting on the various applications Chelsea College of Art and Design. Most and did make representations to retain the recently, he was nominated for the Royal 03 Hackney Society Events industrial building as a reminder of Tudor British Society of Sculptors’ Bursary Award. 04 Book Review Road’s heritage. The Planning Inspectorate, By making work that is unconcerned with 04 Noticeboard however, whilst being sympathetic to this creative disciplines, his sculptures and 04 Publications plea, said that it was not a good enough installations co-exist across the realms of example design-wise to warrant retention. art, design and architecture. ‘Throughout the 04 Hackney Society News Building Watch Leyton Marsh – Green Space For Whom? By Celia Coram The subject matter of Spaces is space, we would become ‘demonised’. more usually concerned with the Supported by members of the Occupy built environment of Hackney. Leyton Movement, who set up camp next to the Marsh is technically in the borough of fenced-off building site, we bonded as a Waltham Forest. However, regardless group in a very special way. Regardless of political boundaries, all the marshes of what many may perceive of Occupy, are accessed regularly by local people our personal experience as ordinary local and are of both local and national residents has been that they are very brave, significance. Open space and the built outstanding people, who put their principles environment are equally subject to before their own needs and comforts. planning legislation and processes, Following non-violent attempts to prevent and what I am about to describe is vehicle access to the site, judicial injunctions relevant to all who have an interest in were served to move the camp off Porter’s and passion for preserving the best and Field and later off the verge of the Lea championing good new design in the Bridge Road. Four people from Occupy areas in which we live. were arrested. On a chilly, snow-laden evening on 3 In April, there was a hearing at the High February, many Hackney and Waltham Court. Summing up, the judge recognised Forest residents made a precarious that local people had followed the for an adjoining site which is. It is generally journey to Waltham Forest Town Hall to democratic process without success. He find out the fate of a proposal to build a accepted knowledge that wildlife does not took into account that the three defendants just need a sanctuary to survive but also all temporary basketball facility on Porter’s before him (one person had opted to plead Field, Leyton Marsh. As we sat, squashed, the random ‘corridors’ that some people guilty at Magistrates Court) had human think we can easily give up. in the public gallery, speakers opposed to rights. However, the judge declared Article the development made some convincing 1 of Property Law to trump Articles 10 and In addition to wildlife of the marshes and coherent arguments as to why the 11 of the Human Rights Act. SLM have a suffering disturbance, local people have had ‘temporary basketball facility’ should not contrary view – that the ownership of the to sacrifice restrictions on their freedoms be built on Leyton Marsh, backed up by a land is not lawful since it was granted on an of movement, expression, assembly and petition of over 1,000 signatures gathered erroneous basis and a judicial review has the right just to roam as a result of the in a very short time. Those pro the plan been submitted on that basis. development of a sports facility. Today did not, as I recall, make much of their Porter’s Field bears no trace of the Occupy At a local meeting organised by the ODA argument, mostly relying on the mantra campers, but there is a large, white (Olympic Delivery Authority) to inform and that ‘The Olympics were an exceptional ‘Lightweight Event Structure’, enclosed in a reassure the public about the restoration circumstance’ for development on protected Stalag-style fence, with tarmac laid crudely of Leyton Marsh (at which eight police Metropolitan Open Land (MOL). as an access road. Why was this land officers were present including three in plain sacrificed when there were, in our opinion, As the vote taken by a mere seven clothes), the residents spoke about the alternative, sporting facilities based within councillors went three-three with the Chair’s climate of fear generated by the apparent the required distance of the Olympic Park casting vote sealing the fate of the Porter’s ‘total’ policing at Leyton Marsh. However, as well as industrial buildings that could Field part of the Marsh, I had that ‘been SLM continues to monitor, record and have been converted? It is evident that here before’ feeling as exactly the same challenge the various bodies involved the contract for the said Lightweight Event outcome a few months earlier had befallen about the environmental impact that the Structure was set out by the Contracting the Essex Wharf site with agreement for a building process has entailed, e.g. removing Authority to award on or before May 2011, housing development. more than the 15 cm of topsoil agreed by and designated to be there. One might speculate that the ‘temporary’ Waltham Forest Council, and unearthing This illustrates a particular difficulty that aspect of this building helped to justify post-WW2 toxic rubble and leaving it local people face in responding to large- agreement on the basketball training uncovered for months. scale initiatives – the requirement to build facility being built – but this was not to SLM’s main goal now is to ensure that the on such a scale necessitates setting up the be a mere tent but a construction which land is restored to the conditions required contracting processes well in advance of required concrete foundations and other by local people, with the right kind of turf proper consultation. infrastructure not generally considered to be and plant species. Regular users of Porter’s of a temporary nature. Field have knowledge of what was there and As locals, we need to be alert to the do not want to be fobbed off with ‘quick infringements of our human rights – this Later in the lobby, horrified and disgruntled fix turf’. We might prefer to wait longer and might sound dramatic when pitched against people drew together, contacts were have the field returned in better condition situations in other parts of the world, yet exchanged and a meeting was organised post 15 October 2012 (the promised date recent events have led me to see that we the following week resulting in the Save when reparations should begin). We are are far less free than we think. The right of Leyton Marshes (SLM) campaign. concerned because, although the basketball access to common land (or land managed Little did we know then that, as local people facility site was not on an SSSI (Site of on our behalf) can be withdrawn with the with a deep connection to local green Special Scientific Interest), it is a buffer zone flick of a pen.
Recommended publications
  • London Metropolitan Archives South Hackney
    LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 1 SOUTH HACKNEY SCHOOL ACC/3454 Reference Description Dates Cassland County Secondary School (formerly South Hackney Central School ) ACC/3454/001 Logbook for Lauriston Road Central School 1910 Aug Lauriston Road Central School -1913 Mar 1 volume ACC/3454/002 Logbook for South Hackney Central School;For 1913 Sep Logbook 1928-1937 see -1918 May LCC/EO/DN4/SOU/LB/1 South Hackney Central School 1 volume ACC/3454/003 Waiting List and Admission Register for South 1928 Apr-1944 Hackney Central School (some pages illegible Feb as ink has run) South Hackney Central School 1 volume ACC/3454/004 Waiting List and Admission Register for South 1942 Sep Hackney Central School -1948 Apr South Hackney Central School 1 volume ACC/3454/005 Admission Register South Hackney Central 1944 Aug School (from 1951 Cassland County Secondary -1958 Jun School) For Admission Register see LCC/EO/ DIV4/LAU/LB/1-6 South Hackney Central School 1 volume ACC/3454/006 Register of school leavers (entered in Register 1951 Jul-1960 of Children over Compulsory School Age) Apr Cassland County Secondary School 1 volume ACC/3454/007 Weekly attendance record with names of 1955 Sep school leavers -1956 Jul Cassland County Secondary School 1 volume ACC/3454/008/001 H.M.Inspector's reports on Cassland County 1952 Nov Secondary School & Lauriston County Secondary School LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 2 SOUTH HACKNEY SCHOOL ACC/3454 Reference Description Dates ACC/3454/008/002 H.M.Inspector's reports on Cassland County 1952 Nov Secondary School &
    [Show full text]
  • Asda Crossharbour District Centre
    STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE 9th June 2021 Report of the Corporate Director of Place Classification: Unrestricted Application for Planning Permission Reference PA/19/02534 Site Asda – Crossharbour District Centre, 151 East Ferry Road, London, E14 3BT Ward Blackwall and Cubitt Town Proposal A hybrid planning application (part detailed, part outline) for the demolition of existing buildings and the comprehensive, mixed-use, re- development of the site, comprising a maximum of 218,991sqm (GEA) of floorspace. Full details are submitted for 526 residential units (Class C3), flexible commercial floorspace, including a new foodstore (17,087sqm GIA - A1-A4/B1), a primary school (D1), community uses (D1), public bus parking and a site wide basement, with associated uses as part of the development including car parking (up to 410 spaces), cycle parking, and an energy centre. Building heights would range between a maximum of 17.4m AOD (3 storeys above ground level) and 60m AOD (15 storeys above ground level). Creation of new vehicular and pedestrian access and public realm works, including all ground floor hard and soft landscaping and other works incidental to the proposals, including a programme of interim works (which include a temporary multi-storey car park with 349 car parking spaces and a temporary access lobby to the retail foodstore). Outline permission (with layout, scale, appearance and landscaping at upper levels being reserved) is sought for up to 111,137sqm GEA above podium level, comprising of between 1217 and 1446 residential units (C3), with associated private and communal podium amenity and landscaping, within four buildings with maximum heights ranging between up to 45.850m (AOD)/12 storeys and up to 115.50m (AOD)/32 storeys.
    [Show full text]
  • Map Series of Walks Connecting Hackney's
    The route passes some interesting architecture. MAP SERIES OF WALKS Haggerston Pool. Splendidly ornate building. Opened Gainsborough Studios (north of Shoreditch Park); City in 1904 and now abandoned. of London skyline including the Gherkin; St Leonard’s CONNECTING HACKNEY’S St Mary’s Garden. Run by Thrive, a charity which Hospital, Hoxton Street; LCC blocks (Tyssen Street); provides horticultural training. Open during the day: Geffrye Museum; old and new houses along Pearson PARKS & OPEN SPACES another wonderful haven in urban south Hackney, with Street; Fellows Court (1960s housing), Haggerston trees, shrubs, flowers and vegetables. Monthly open Pool; Whiston Estate (1950s design similar to days and often plants for sale. Bankside Power Station – now Tate Modern); Broadway Market (C19 buildings, and Gas Holders); Haggerston Park. Created in 1970s on land which Hothouse by railway bridge on Martello Street; was once the site of Gas Works, bombed in 1944. A Hackney Town Hall; Hackney Empire. Lots of cafés dock linked the works to the Regent’s Canal (opened and places to stop and enjoy wildlife and views. in 1820). The dock is now filled in and planted with silver birch. Fine wisteria curls round columns near Shoreditch Park. Area badly bombed in World War II. Whiston Road entrance. Trees in walled section Two sections separated by Bridport Street. Mostly include dawn redwood, red oak, Norway maple, managed as amenity grassland, also tennis courts, Midland thorn, hawthorn, yew, prunus, willow and children’s play area and a large Play Park. Round the cotoneaster, as well as shrubs and flowers. Across the perimeter are seats and trees (cherries, false acacia, grassed sports area is newly created gateway from whitebeam, tree of heaven, giant redwood) – home to Dove Row and Whiston Estate.
    [Show full text]
  • Delivery Charge
    DELIVERY CHARGE N1 Canonbury Kings Cross, Islington, Pentonville Hoxton £15.00 N2 East Finchley, Fortis Green, Hampstead Garden £15.00 N3 Finchley, Church End, Finchley Central £15.00 Finsbury Park, Manor House, Harringey (part) stroud £10.00 N4 green (part) N5 Highbury Highbury Fields £15.00 N6 Highgate, Hampstead Heath (part) £15.00 Holloway, Barnsbury (part) Islington (part), Tufnell £10.00 N7 park (part) N8 Hornsey, Crouch End, Harringey (part) £10.00 N9 Lower Edmonton, Edmonton (part) £10.00 N10 Muswell Hill £10.00 New Southgate, Friern Barnet, Bounds Green, Arnos £12.00 N11 Grove (part) N12 North Finchley, Woodside Park £15.00 N13 Palmers Green £10.00 N14 Southgate, Oakwood, Arnos Grove (part) £10-£15 South Tottenham, Harringey (part) West Green, Seven £6.00 N15 Sisters, Stamford Hill (part) Stoke Newington, Stamford Hill (part) Shacklewell, £6.00 N16 Dalston, Newington Green (part) N17 High Cross, Bruce Grove, Northumberland Park £6.00 N18 Upper Edmonton, Edmonton (part) £10.00 Upper Holloway, Archway, Tufnell Park (part) Hornsey £10.00 N19 (part) N20 Whetstone, Totteridge, Oakleigh Park £15.00 N21 Winchmore Hill, Bush Hill, Grange Park £12.00 N22 Wood Green, Bounds Green (part), Bowes Park £10.00 E1 Wapping £15.00 Bethnal Green, Haggerston Shoreditch, Cambridge £16.00 E2 Heath E3 Bow, Bromley-by-bow, Old Ford, Mile End, Three Mills £20.00 Chingford, Sewardstone, Highams Park, Upper £16.00 E4 Edmonton (part) E5 Upper Clapton, Lower Clapton, Stoke Newington (part) £12.00 E6 East Ham, Beckton, Upton Park, Barking £25.00 E7 Forest
    [Show full text]
  • South Hackney Recovery Team CMHT
    Enter and View visit South Hackney Recovery Team CMHT February 2020 Service South Hackney Recovery Team Service address Donald Winnicott Centre, Coate Road London, E2 9AG Provider name East London Foundation Trust (ELFT) Date/Time of visit 20 February 2020 E&V representative/s Kanariya Yuseinova Emma Cooke Rachel Klem Healthwatch staff contact Kanariya Yuseinova Service contact Adesoji Ogungbola 020 7275 1000 About Healthwatch enter and view visits The Local Government and Public Involvement Act 2007, as amended by the 2012 Health and Social Care Act and directed by Local Healthwatch Regulations 013, imposes a duty on health and social care providers (including the private sector) to allow authorised representatives of Local Healthwatch to enter premises they own or control to observe the services being provided. These are legally binding directions and are often referred to as ‘the right to enter and view’. Purpose of the visit 1 One in six adults has a common mental disorder such as anxiety and depression Mental health services are of increasing concern to the public. In Hackney, mental health is consistently raised with us by the public as a key issue. Healthwatch Hackney decided that for 2020, one of our Enter and View priorities would be to review mental health services provision in the borough and report on the care quality. The purpose of Enter and View is to collect feedback from people who use the services, staff who provide the services, and others with an interest e.g. carers, where possible. We visited the Community Mental
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 1929
    THE LONDON COMMITTEE OF DEPUTIES OF THE BRITISH JEWS (FOUNDED IN 1760) GENERALLY KNOWN AS THE BOARD OF DEPUTIES OF BRITISH JEWS ANNUAL REPORT FOR 1929 3€ Q. 4Z 8 23 FINSBURY SQUARE LONDON, E.C.2 1930 UBftf^ 3 £ a. X? FORM OF BEQUEST. I bequeath to the LONDON COMMITTEE OF DEPUTIES OF THE BRITISH JEWS {generally known as the Board of Deputies of British Jews) the sum of £ free of duty, to be applied to the general purposes of the said Board and the receipt of the Treasurer for the time being of the said Board shall be a sufficient discharge for the same. CONTENTS. Alphabetical List of Deputies ... ... ... ... 5 List of Congregations and Institutes represented on the Board 18 Committees ... ... ... ... - ... ... 24 27 ... ... ... ד.. Annual Report—Introduction Law and Parliamentary Committee ••• ••• 29 Aliens Committee ••• *•• ••• 35 Shechita Committee ... ... .... ... 36 38 ••• ׳ ••• ••־ ••• Press Committee Education Committee ••• ••• ••• - •• • 39 40 ״. Foieign Appeals Committee Finance Committee ••• ••• ••• 40 ••• ... Palestine 40 Joint Foreign Committee ••• ••• ••• 44 Appendix A. — Memorandum on Civil Service Appointments ... ... ... ... ... 51 Appendix B.—Memorandum on Aliens Legislation ... 55 59 ••* ••• ••׳ ••• ••• ••• Accounts Secretaries for Marriage ••• ••> ••• ••• 64 Secretary : J. M. RICH, M.A., LL.B. 23 Finsbury Sq., E.C-2 Telephone : Clerkenwell 1187 and 8642 ' י.Telegraphic Address : " Lemonds London Solicitor: CHARLES H. L. EMANUEL, M.A. 5 THE BOARD OF DEPUTIES OF BRITISH JEWS. ALPHABETICAL LIST OF DEPUTIES. Revised to August 14th, 1930. Showing attendances during 1929. No. of meetings held, 10, (The date of.a Deputy's first election to the Board is not necessarily the date of his election for the Constituency he now represents.) First Elected No.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplement to the London Gazette, February 25, 1871
    SUPPLEMENT TO THE LONDON GAZETTE, FEBRUARY 25, 1871. NAME. RESIDENCE. OCCUPATION. Foster, William Burdett 76, East India-road, Poplar, E. Gentleman Fax-bridge, John 19, Bedford-place, Commercial-road, E. Oilman Gadsdon, Benj. 40, Union-street, Bishopsgate Ironmonger Gadsdon, Charles 40, Union-street, Bishopsgate Ironmonger Grant, James 41, Guildford-street, Russell-square Gentleman Gould, John 33, Chicksand-street, Whitechapel Manufacturing Chemist Gates, George Chesham House, Clifton-road, Brighton Gentleman Gainer, Joseph Stonehouse, Gloucestershire Gentleman Galloway, R. The Gresham Club, City, E.G. Gentleman Grey, Lieut. H. R. E. Care of Messrs. Tory, Hildreth, and Lieutenant R.N, Ommanney, 41, Norfork-street, Strand Gross, Charles Bexley-road, Erith, S.E. Gentleman Goodwin, Benjamin Belgrave-terrace Oakfield-road, Hackney Gentleman Grillon, Gustave 5, Stafford-place, Pimlico Gentleman Gatenby, Robt. 66, Christian-street, St. George's, E. Coffee Roaster Giles, Richard M., deceased 2, Woodgrange-villas, Forest Gate, E. (James Marsh and John Wilson, executors) Gillum, Stephen F., and f Gentleman Mary Ann, his wife Layfield House, Sudbury Goode, John Richard, sen. Woodford, Essex Gentleman Hall, Benjamin, Jun. 54, Bromley-street, Commercial-road E. Gentleman Hunter, Edward The Glebe, Blackheath Gentleman Hubbard, John (deceased), 171, High-street, Shadwell Mary Hubbard and another Executors Hedgman, James Elm Bank, Barnes, Surrey Gentleman Hadow, Patrick D. 122, Leadenhall-street, London, E.C. Gentleman Holmes, Ann 32, Groom-bridge-road, South Hackney Spinster Hopper, Thos. Duck 25, Eastcheap, E.C. Merchant Hammack, Henry Lawrence 59, Bishopsgate-street, E.C. Architect Hall, Benjamin 54, Bromley-street, Commercial-road E. Gentleman Haigh, John 293, Mile End-road, E Haberdasher Hart, Amy Ayton House, Seven Sisters'-road, Stoke Spinster Newington Holding, George 31, Great St.
    [Show full text]
  • Hackney Transport Strategy 2014-2024
    Hackney Transport Strategy 2014-2024 Walking Plan Summer 2014 PJ55910 Hackney Transport Strategy 2014‐2024 Walking Plan Contents 1. Introduction Page 3 2. Daughter Documents Page 6 3. Why the need for a Walking Plan? Page 7 4. Policy Frameworks Page 10 5. Walking in Hackney – current trends and targets Page 11 6. Challenges and barriers to walking more in Hackney Page 17 7. Proposed Actions, Policies and Proposals Page 22 8. Action Plan for Walking Page 30 9. Delivery Plan – Funding and Priorities Page 48 10. Monitoring Page 55 11. Bibliography Page 56 Tables Table 1: Hacking Walking to Work comparison table Page 13 Table 2: Travel to school mode share in Hackney Page 15 Table 3: Barriers to walking Page 17 Table 4: Consultation Issues Raised Page 19 Table 5: Impacts of Workplace Travel Plans Page 46 Table 6: Public Realm Major Schemes Page 50 Table 7: Local Improvement Schemes Page 52 Table 8: Smarter Travel/ Encouragment Measures Page 54 Figures Figure 1: Census 2001 walking to work levels in Hackney Page 14 Figure 2: Hackney Central APP proposed public realm interventions Page 33 Figure 3: Hackney Wick AAP proposed public realm & open space improvements Page 36 Figure 4: Legible london ‐ Existing & proposed short term extension of LL signage Page 34 2 Hackney Transport Strategy 2014‐2024 Walking Plan 1. Introduction Walking remains the most basic and commonly used form of transportation. The vast majority of all journeys start with and end with a walk regardless of the modes used in between. This Walking Plan outlines Hackney Council’s commitment towards walking and sets out a set of policies and proposals for the period 2014 to 2024 to make walking a normal, safe and attractive choice for travel and recreation for our residents and those that work, visit and pass through the borough.
    [Show full text]
  • Stories of a Hackney Generation
    Diversity Stories of a Hackney Generation CONNECT HACKNEY ageing better Clockwise from top left: Newton Dunbar, Patricia Charlesworth, Centre 151, Harold Rubin, Anita Jacques, Clair Battaglino I hope by sharing these stories, people “living and working in Hackney are inspired to continue to celebrate the diversity the borough holds...” Introduction Connect Hackney works to tackle loneliness and isolation amongst people aged 50 and over. The issue of loneliness and isolation is multifaceted, and personal to each person who experiences it. One way we are tackling the issue is by providing more opportunities for older people to play an active role within their community, showcasing the valuable contributions they make. Hackney is a melting pot of people from a diverse mix of backgrounds, each with their own story of how Hackney became their home. What I’ve personally enjoyed about the Diversity Project is the unearthing of these stories and hearing how Hackney has changed. But within that, also seeing how much Hackney people celebrate the diversity of the borough, with people from different races, cultures, religions and sexual identities living side-by-side. These stories, similar to the ones we shared in our Windrush publication last year, provide an opportunity for these stories to be heard, both now and for generations to come. The more we understand about each other, the more opportunities we create for people to make new social connections, be valued and respected, and lead more fulfilling lives. I hope by sharing these stories, people living and working in Hackney are inspired to continue to celebrate the diversity the borough holds, particularly amongst its older residents; ensuring that no matter where you come from, your religious beliefs, who you love, or your age, you feel welcomed, valued and respected for the person you are.
    [Show full text]
  • London Borough of Hackney Third Local Implementation Plan (2019
    London Borough of Hackney Third Local Implementation Plan (2019-2022) March 2019 Contents List of Figures and Tables 4 Foreword 5 Executive summary 6 1. Introduction and preparing a LIP 9 Introduction 9 Local approval process 9 Statutory consultation 9 Statutory duties 10 LIP approval 10 2. Borough Transport Objectives 11 Introduction 11 Local context 11 Changing the transport mix 20 Outcome 1: London’s streets will be healthy and more Londoners will travel actively 28 Outcome 2: London’s streets will be safe and secure 41 Outcome 3: London’s streets will be used more efficiently and have less traffic on them 52 Outcome 4: London’s streets will be clean and green 61 Outcome 5: The public transport network will meet the needs of a growing London 69 Outcome 6: Public transport will be safe, affordable and accessible to all 73 Outcome 7: Journeys by public transport will be pleasant, fast and reliable 78 Outcome 8: Active, efficient and sustainable travel will be the best option in new developments 81 Outcome 9: Transport investment will unlock the delivery of new homes and jobs 84 Other Mayoral Strategies 90 3. The Delivery Plan 93 Introduction 93 TfL Business Plan 93 Sources of funding 95 Long-Term interventions to 2041 97 Hackney LIP delivery programme (2019-2022) 101 Risks to the delivery of the three-year programme 107 Monitoring the delivery of the outcomes of the Mayor’s Transport Strategy 112 MTS and borough outcome indicator targets 113 Appendix A Hackney Local Implementation Plan Objectives and Targets 123 Appendix B Hackney Transport
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary Summer 2014
    Hackney Transport Strategy 2014-2024 Executive Summary Summer 2014 PJ56327 Hackney Transport Strategy 2014-2024 – Executive Summary Executive Summary 1. Introduction 1.1 This is the Hackney’s Transport Strategy 2014‐2024. The Strategy sets out Hackney’s strategic transportation aims, objectives and priorities for 2014‐2024. The Strategy aims to support other Strategies including the Sustainable Community Strategy and the emerging Local Development Framework. 1.2 The vision for Hackney’s Transport Strategy is: “By 2024, Hackney’s transport system will be an exemplar for sustainable urban living in London. It will be fair, equitable, safe and responsive to the needs of its residents and businesses, facilitating the highest quality of life standards for a borough in the Capital and leading London in its approach to tackling its urban transport challenges of the 21st Century.” 1.3 By 2024, this Hackney’s Transport Strategy will have achieved the following goals: I. Hackney is renowned for having the most pedestrian and cyclist friendly neighbourhoods, streets and public realm in London. II. Hackney remains one of London’s most liveable boroughs with green, safe and thriving neighbourhoods, streets and public spaces where different communities get on and interact. III. To have played an important role in improved resident’s health and well being, as well as tackling obesity levels through higher rates of active travel. IV. To have substantially reduced road danger for all our residents but particularly more vulnerable groups such as older people and children and especially vulnerable road users such as cyclists, pedestrians and motorcyclists. V. To have continued the reduction in car ownership and created an environment where owning a private car is not the norm.
    [Show full text]
  • POST CODE DISTRICT BOROUGH E1 Mile End Tower Hamlets E1
    POST CODE DISTRICT BOROUGH E1 Mile End Tower Hamlets E1 Shadwell Tower Hamlets E1 Stepney Tower Hamlets E1 Wapping Tower Hamlets E1 Whitechapel Tower Hamlets E2 Bethal Green Tower Hamlets E2 Shoreditch Hackney E3 Bromley-by-Bow Tower Hamlets E3 Bow Tower Hamlets E3 Old Ford Tower Hamlets E3 Poplar Tower Hamlets E4 Chingford Waltham Forest E4 Highams Park Waltham Forest E5 Clapton Hackney E6 Beckton Newham E6 East Ham Newham E7 Forest Gate Newham E7 West Ham Newham E8 Dalston Hackney E8 Hackney Hackney E9 Homerton Hackney E9 South Hackney Hackney E10 Leyton Redbridge E11 Leytonstone Waltham Forest E11 Wanstead Redbridge E12 Manor Park Newham E13 Plaistow Newham E14 Isle of Dogs Tower Hamlets E14 Limehouse Tower Hamlets E14 Millwall Tower Hamlets E14 Poplar Tower Hamlets E15 Stratford Newham E15 West Ham Newham E16 Canning Town Newham E16 North Woolwich Newham E16 Silvertown Newham E16 Victoria Docks Newham E17 Walthamstow Waltham Forest E18 Snarebrook Redbridge E18 South Woodford Redbridge EC1 Barbican Islington EC1 Clerkenwell Islington EC1 Finsbury Islington EC2 Liverpool Street City of London EC2 Moorgate City of London EC3 Algate City of London EC3 Fenchurch Street City of London EC3 Monument City of London EC3 Tower Tower Hamlets EC4 Blackfriars City of London EC4 Fleet Street City of London EC4 St Paul's City of London EC4 Temple City of London N1 Barnsbury Islington N1 Canonbury Islington N1 Hoxton Hackney N1 Islington Islington N1 Shoreditch Hackney N2 East Finchley Barnet N2 Finchley Barnet N2 Hampstead Gdn Suburb (East) Barnet
    [Show full text]