Westminster Ponds / Pond Mills ESA Master Plan Update

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Westminster Ponds / Pond Mills ESA Master Plan Update Westminster Ponds / Pond Mills Environmentally Significant Area Master Plan Update 2005 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Westminster Ponds / Pond Mills Environmentally Significant Area Master Plan update was developed by dedicated individuals who have contributed many hours to establish guidelines for preserving this environmental area for future generations. These people continue an 80-year legacy of people working to preserve and enjoy this Environmentally Significant Area (ESA) located in the heart of London. A special thanks to the specific individuals and organizations represented on the Local Advisory Committee: Karen Auzins - Rotary Club of London West Bonnie Bergsma - City of London Hugh Casbourn - McIlwraith Field Naturalists Ron Challis - Labour Council Will Cook - Millbank Villas Steve Couture - Western Ontario Fish and Game Protective Association (Alternate) David Crockett - London Health Sciences Centre Brenda Gallagher - Upper Thames River Conservation Authority Stan Gibbs - Western Ontario Fish and Game Protective Association Gary Kay - Global Action Plan Catherine Kurucz - Thames Valley District School Board Jack Lorimer - McIlwraith Field Naturalists Andrew Macpherson - City of London Jim Mahon - Neighbour Cheryl Miller - City of London Ward 5 Councillor Bob McLeod - Neighbour Steve Sauder - Upper Thames River Conservation Authority Alex Shivas - Upper Thames River Conservation Authority Tara Tchir - Upper Thames River Conservation Authority Dave Wake - McIlwraith Field Naturalists Barbara Wyatt-Chiodo - Westminster / Pond Mills Environmental Education Centres A special thanks also to Dr. W. Judd and Elisabeth Fritz for the historical perspectives, continuing support and dedication to the Westminster Ponds / Pond Mills Environmentally Significant Area (ESA). Thank you to the ESA Team for sharing their experience and knowledge of the Westminster Ponds / Pond Mills ESA. The ESA Team is comprised of UTRCA staff who work in cooperation with the City of London to manage the six publically-owned (City and UTRCA owned) ESAs including Sifton Bog, Kilally, Warbler Woods, Westminster Ponds / Pond Mills, Medway and Meadowlily. The main responsibilities of the ESA Team are education, risk management, encroachment and enforcement. This team is responsible for implementing many of the management recommendations that develop from the Westminster Ponds / Pond Mills Master Plan. Thank you to the staff of the Upper Thames River Conservation Authority who shared their expertise in developing and editing this Master Plan update. A special thanks to Phil Simm who developed the numerous maps for the Master Plan update. Finally, thank you to the City of London for the financial assistance and staff support for this project. i Westminster Ponds / Pond Mills Environmentally Significant Area Master Plan Update 2005 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Significance Westminster Ponds / Pond Mills Environmentally Significant Area (ESA) is the largest natural area in the City of London, covering approximately 250 hectares (618 acres). The ESA contains the Westminster Ponds area (including Saunders Pond, Spettigue Pond and Tumbleson Pond) in the west, the Pond Mills area (including North Pond and South Pond) in the east, and the Dayus Creek Valley (including Thompson Pond) in the centre (Map 1). The ESA is significant for its size, rich variety of natural habitats, rolling topography and unique “kettle” ponds, all within an urban setting. Most of the Westminster Ponds / Pond Mills ESA is owned by the City of London (Map 2). Smaller portions are owned by the London Health Sciences Centre (LHSC), the Upper Thames River Conservation Authority (UTRCA), the Western Ontario Fish and Game Protective Association, and other private landowners. The publicly owned property is managed by the UTRCA. The ESA’s land formations were created during the glacial retreat of the Huron and Erie ice sheets more than 12,000 years ago. The kettle ponds were created when large blocks of ice were left behind by the glaciers, creating permanent depressions that filled with water. The ESA’s five major ponds and numerous smaller ponds are the best examples of kettle ponds remaining in the London area. The deep, cool ponds are fed by surface runoff. The varied topography and drainage of the ESA support an exceptionally rich flora. The dry ridges between the kettle ponds have a typical Sugar Maple hardwood forest, with a mixture of several other tree species including ashes, oaks, hickories, Basswood, Hop-hornbeam, American Beech and Black Cherry. The low wet areas between the ridges support an entirely different type of forest with Red Maple, Yellow Birch, Silver Maple and White Elm. The ESA includes a marsh, swamp, and bog complex that is a Provincially Significant Wetland (PSW). The shrub thickets and herbaceous plants are even more varied than the forests. The cool, wet, shady Red Maple swamps are home to several plants that are more common in northern locations, such as Gold Thread, Bluebead Lily, and various ferns and mosses. Southern species such as dogwoods and hickories can often be found growing close by. In addition to its unusual and representative vegetation communities, the Westminster Ponds / Pond Mills ESA is also recognized as valuable habitat for wildlife; including fish, insects and migrating waterfowl. The area attracts a large number of wildlife species because of the diverse vegetation and the presence of the ponds. Process The Westminster Ponds / Pond Mills ESA Master Plan update has been completed collaboratively by the City of London, the UTRCA, and interested community organizations and individuals. At a community meeting in May 2003, 65 people gave input into issues, concerns and opportunities for Westminster Ponds / Pond Mills ESA. From this meeting a Local Advisory Committee (LAC) was formed. iii Westminster Ponds / Pond Mills Environmentally Significant Area Master Plan Update 2005 The strength of the planning process was the 21- member LAC. This committee helped develop the mission, guiding principles, goals & objectives, criteria for decision- making, and recommendations for the update of the Master Plan. The LAC members, representing 13 different organizations, worked together from September 2003 to August 2004. The UTRCA provided technical information, including past reports and newly completed studies. The Westminster Ponds / Pond Mills Environmentally Significant Area Master Plan Update was presented to and approved by the City of London Planning Committee on June 20, 2005. Planning Committee sent the following report to Municipal Council: That, on the recommendation of the General Manager of Planning and Development, the Westminster Ponds / Pond Mills Environmentally Significant Area Master Plan Update BE APPROVED; it being noted the Planning Committee heard a presentation from S. Sauder and T. Tchir from the Upper Thames River Conservation Authority; it being pointed out that at the public participation meeting associated with this matter, [two] individuals [representing the London Coalition Against Pesticides] made an oral submission … noting that while they generally support the Plan, there should be revisions to ensure that alternatives to the use of pesticides or herbicides are explored and built into the final recommendations [and] … requesting further information with respect to the proposed use of herbicides in the Ponds area and requesting that there be a provision for the ongoing monitoring of any test areas or that interested City residents be utilized to assist with the manual removal of unwanted vegetation. Municipal Council adopted the Planning Committee’s report on June 27, 2005, with the following amendment added to the end of the first paragraph: it being further noted that the Upper Thames River Conservation Authority is encouraged to work with volunteers for the purpose of manually removing unwanted vegetation in the subject area to avoid, wherever possible, the use of herbicides. Results More than 30 reports were reviewed and incorporated into the Master Plan update. An inventory of vegetation communities was also completed for the entire ESA. Studies of the ESA have found: • more than 200 vegetation communities • 757 species of vascular plants, including 30 that are nationally and/or provincially rare, and 60 % of the plant species found in Middlesex County • over 200 species of birds • 19 species of fish • 14 species of amphibians • nine species of reptiles • numerous insect species Seventeen maps have been created to support the background information and guide decision-making for the future including: the study area, vegetation communities, water well locations, ESA boundaries, property ownership, Carolinian Canada zone, naturalization recommendations and trail recommendations. iv Westminster Ponds / Pond Mills Environmentally Significant Area Master Plan Update 2005 Over 85 recommendations have been developed to guide decision-making and the budget for Westminster Ponds / Pond Mills ESA over the next ten years. All recommendations have been written in collaboration with the LAC based upon the best technical information available. Implementation of the recommendations will go a long way toward fulfilling the new mission statement: The City of London, the UTRCA, and community partners will preserve the ecological integrity of Westminster Ponds / Pond Mills Environmentally Significant Area while providing compatible educational and recreational opportunities. v Westminster Ponds / Pond Mills Environmentally Significant Area Master Plan
Recommended publications
  • Prostanthera Askania Recovery Plan
    NSW and National Recovery Plan Prostanthera askania Recovery Plan January 2006 Department of Environment and Conservation (NSW) Published by the Department of Environment and Conservation (NSW) © Department of Environment and Conservation (NSW), 2006. 43 Bridge Street (PO Box 1967) Hurstville NSW 2220 Tel: 02 95856678 www.nationalparks.nsw.gov.au This work is copyright, however material presented in this plan may be copied for personal use or published for educational purposes, providing that any extracts are fully acknowledged. Apart from this and any other use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced without prior written permission from DEC. Requests for information or comments regarding the recovery program for Prostanthera askania should be directed to: The Director-General, Department of Environment and Conservation c/- Biodiversity Conservation Section Metropolitan Branch Environment Protection and Regulation Division Department of Environment and Conservation PO Box 1967 Hurstville, NSW 2220 Ph: (02) 9585 6678 Cover illustration: Prostanthera askania Photographer: D. Stephenson © Department of Environment and Conservation (NSW) This recovery plan should be cited as following: Department of Environment and Conservation (NSW) (2006) Prostanthera askania recovery plan. Department of Environment and Conservation (NSW), Hurstville, NSW. ISBN 1 74137 757 9 Recovery Plan for Prostanthera askania Prostanthera askania recovery plan Executive summary This document constitutes the formal National and New South Wales State recovery plan for Prostanthera askania, and as such considers the conservation requirements of the species across its known range. It identifies the future actions to be taken to ensure the long-term viability of P. askania in nature and the parties who will carry out these actions.
    [Show full text]
  • Oxhey Woods Greenspace Action Plan (Gap) 2017 – 2022
    OXHEY WOODS GREENSPACE ACTION PLAN (GAP) 2017 – 2022 Produced by the Countryside Management Service On behalf of Three Rivers District Council Oxhey Woods Greenspace Action Plan 2017-22 AMENDMENTS TABLE Amendment Date Section Updated Details Officer Oxhey Woods Greenspace Action Plan 2017-22 Contents 1. Site Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Vision Statement ........................................................................................................................... 1 2. Site Description ................................................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Site Location Map ......................................................................................................................... 2 2.2 Site Description Map ..................................................................................................................... 3 2.3 Site Constraints Map ..................................................................................................................... 4 2.4 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 5 2.5 Geography and Landscape ............................................................................................................ 5 2.6 Conservation Designations ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Dodges Ferry Recreation Reserve Management Plan
    2015 Dodges Ferry Recreation Reserve Management Plan Acknowledgements: The work done by Chris and Sally Johns in the preparation of: Draft Dodges Ferry Recreation Reserve Management & Action Plan, 2009 Work carried out by Southern Beaches Landcare/Coastcare and the Dodges Ferry school students and members of the community caring for this important bushland The work done by Craig Airey and Lydia Marino in the preparation of: A brief survey of the invertebrate fauna of the Dodges Ferry Recreation Reserve We would like to acknowledge the Murmurimina of the Oyster Bay Tribe, traditional custodians of this land. Contents Vision……………………………………………………………………………… 1 1.0 Introduction………………………………………………………………………. 1 2.0 Environmental Values of the Reserve………………………………………. 3 3.0 Community Consultation……………………………………………………… 3 4.0 Goals and Key Findings……………………………………………………….. 3 5.0 Native Flora and Fauna............................................................................... 4 5.1 Flora……………………………………………………………………………. 4 5.2 Fauna....................................................................................................... 5 5.3 Threatened Species.................................................................................. 6 6.0 Urban Impact…………………………………………………………………… 6 7.0 Reserve Name……………………………...................................................... 6 8.0 Risk Management……………………………………………………………….. 6 9.0 Pest Plant and Animal Management………………………………………… 7 9.1 Pest Plant……………………………………………………………………… 7 9.2 Pest Animal…………………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Water 2.1 Introduction
    Ballina Shire Council 2004 Comprehensive State of Environment Report Ballina Shire Council State of Environment Report Table of Contents section Page 1 Introduction 1.1 Why has this report been produced?......................................1 1.2 SoE Reporting: A short history ...............................................1 1.3 The pressure-state-response model.......................................2 1.4 How does this report work?....................................................5 1.5 Environmental Management Resources.................................5 1.6 Agency response to SoE process ..........................................6 1.7 Future SoE reports.................................................................6 2 Water 2.1 Introduction ............................................................................7 2.2 Trends at a Glance.................................................................8 2.3 Pressures On Our Water........................................................8 2.4 State Of Our Water ..............................................................19 2.5 Response to these pressures...............................................29 2.6 More Information ..................................................................42 2.7 Definitions ............................................................................42 2.8 References...........................................................................43 3 Waste 3.1 Introduction ..........................................................................51 3.2 Trends
    [Show full text]
  • Public Opinions and Perceptions of Peri-Urban Plant Invasion: the Role of Garden Waste Disposal in Forest Fragments
    Management of Biological Invasions (2020) Volume 11, Issue 4: 733–746 Special Issue: Detection and control of alien forest species in a changing world Guest editors: Maarten de Groot, Jana Kus Veenvliet, Nikica Ogris, Lado Kutnar and Aleksander Marinšek CORRECTED PROOF Research Article Public opinions and perceptions of peri-urban plant invasion: the role of garden waste disposal in forest fragments Mirjana Šipek* and Nina Šajna University of Maribor, Koroška c. 160, Maribor, Slovenia Author e-mails: [email protected] (MŠ), [email protected] (NŠ) *Corresponding author Co-Editors’ Note: This study was contributed in relation to the international conference Abstract “Detection and control of forest invasive alien species in a dynamic world” held in Horticulture is an important source of alien plant species that could potentially escape Ljubljana, Slovenia, September 25th–29th, 2019 the garden fence, survive in nature, reproduce abundantly and finally became harmful organized by the project LIFE ARTEMIS to natural ecosystems (i.e. invasive). Additionally, residential garden owners promote (LIFE15 GIE/SI/000770) (https://www.tuje the invasion of alien species by dumping garden waste in nature. A surprisingly high rodne-vrste.info/en/project-life-artemis/project- activities/international-conference-2019/). number of garden waste deposits was found in lowland peri-urban forest fragments This conference has provided a venue for the in NE Slovenia. A positive relationship between proximity to these deposits and the exchange of information on various aspects number of alien plant species originative from discarded plants has been observed. of early detection and rapid response of forest This fact encouraged us to assess public knowledge of and opinions about invasive invasive alien species.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Disturbance
    Quarterly Journal of PRBO Conservation Science. Number 131, Winter 2003. $3.50 131 ObserverMinimizing impacts on wildlife Human Disturbance Melissa Pitkin Contents When you go out for a day at the beach non-native shrub in a yard results in or a hike in the woods, what do you take broader consequences on a large scale. with you? Probably a daypack, water bot- Whether direct or indirect, disturbance Human Disturbance . 1 tle, perhaps binoculars and a camera, often results from situations where indi- Executive Director’s Column . 2 some food, and a few other essentials, viduals are unaware of the impact of their right? I would like to add to your list of actions. With awareness, beachgoers may Vulnerable Coastal Habitats . 3 essentials one more item, a big one, per- decide to walk on the wet sand away from Invasive Plants . 5 haps the most important: awareness. By nesting habitat, and a backyard land- Responsible Science . 6 this I mean awareness of the surrounding scaper may choose to plant a native shrub ecosystem and the effects your actions that will provide bird habitat while help- Birding Ethics . 9 may be having on it. ing to keep neighboring parks and open Focus on Feeders . 10 This Observer is devoted to the topic spaces as functioning wildlife habitat. of human-caused disturbance in ecosys- At PRBO, we develop recommenda- Planned Gifts to PRBO: IRAs . 12 tems. Through our daily routines, recre- tions to minimize the negative effects of Spain Oil Spill . 13 ational and occupational activities we human-caused disturbance on birds and Calendar .
    [Show full text]
  • District Reserve Management Plan
    WHAKATĀNE DISTRICT COUNCIL District Reserve Management Plan Preface .................................................................. 6 Scope and Vision of this Document ........................................................................................................ 6 Purpose of Reserve Provision ................................................................................................................. 6 The Purpose of this Plan ......................................................................................................................... 7 What is an Individual Reserve Management Plan? ................................................................................ 7 What is a District Reserve Management Plan? ....................................................................................... 8 Consultation ............................................................................................................................................ 8 Legal Status of Our Reserves and Open Space ....................................................................................... 8 Section 1: Introduction ....................................... 10 Status of the Plan .................................................................................................................................. 10 Structure of the Plan ............................................................................................................................. 10 Table 1: Key Documents ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Looking for Weeds: Delimiting Survey Guide
    4 Looking for weeds: delimiting survey guide A guide for planning and undertaking delimiting surveys for weeds at the early stage of invasion on public land in Victoria © The State of Victoria Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning 2016 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence. You are free to re-use the work under that licence, on the condition that you credit the State of Victoria as author. The licence does not apply to any images, photographs or branding, including the Victorian Coat of Arms, the Victorian Government logo and the Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning (DELWP) logo. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Prepared by Bec James and Kate Blood (DELWP), with input from Isabella Amouzandeh (formerly of DELWP), Mick Jeffery (Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Qld), and the WESI Steering Group (Nigel Ainsworth, Simon Denby, Ben Fahey, Daniel Joubert, Stefan Kaiser, Sally Lambourne, Kate McArthur, Melodie McGeoch, and former members David Cheal and Penny Gillespie). Guide series review and editing by Dr F. Dane Panetta, Bioinvasion Decision Support. How to cite this document: James, R. and Blood, K. (2016) Looking for weeds: delimiting survey guide. A guide for planning and undertaking delimiting surveys for weeds at the early stage of invasion on public land in Victoria. Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning, Victoria. ISBN 978-1-76047-006-7 (Print) ISBN 978-1-76047-007-4 (pdf/online) Printed by Impact Digital, Brunswick. Cover photo: White-spined Hudson Pear (Cylindropuntia pallida) (foreground and far side of track) at Ouyen State Forest, March 2014 (Photo by Bec James).
    [Show full text]
  • Disposal Methods for Selected Invasive Plant Species Used As Ornamental Garden Plants
    Management of Biological Invasions (2020) Volume 11, Issue 2: 293–305 CORRECTED PROOF Research Article Disposal methods for selected invasive plant species used as ornamental garden plants Simona Strgulc Krajšek*, Erazem Bahčič, Urban Čoko and Jasna Dolenc Koce Department of Biology, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Večna pot 111, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia Author e-mails: [email protected] (SSK), [email protected] (EB), [email protected] (UČ), [email protected] (JDK) *Corresponding author Citation: Strgulc Krajšek S, Bahčič E, Čoko U, Dolenc Koce J (2020) Disposal Abstract methods for selected invasive plant species used as ornamental garden plants. Invasive alien plant species are frequently grown as ornamental plants in gardens. Management of Biological Invasions 11(2): Until recently, in Slovenia, there were neither specific collection centres for a safe 293–305, https://doi.org/10.3391/mbi.2020.11.2.08 disposal of invasive plant species, nor any legislation that defined procedures for Received: 15 October 2019 their removal and disposal. We investigated in two experiments how to dispose of Accepted: 14 January 2020 pieces of selected invasive plant species, with the aim to prevent their survival and Published: 28 February 2020 further dispersion. In the first experiment, we chose eight species that are known for spreading by either growing from pieces of cut stem (Cornus sericea, Handling editor: Anna Gazda Parthenocissus quinquefolia, Buddleja davidii) or through subterranean rhizomes Thematic editor: Catherine Jarnevich and tubers (Solidago canadensis, Solidago gigantea, Rudbeckia laciniata, Helianthus Copyright: © Strgulc Krajšek et al. tuberosus, Symphyotrichum novae-angliae).
    [Show full text]
  • Pathway Risk Analysis for Weed Spread Within Australia (UNE61)
    Pathway risk analysis for weed spread within Australia (UNE61) Appendix 2 – Respondent comments September, 2008 Contents Contents............................................................................................................. i 1 Weed Sources............................................................................................. 2 1.1 Are there any other comments you would like to make with regard to weed sources in Australia?.................................................................................................2 2 Weed Pathways........................................................................................... 3 2.1 Q3(a) If the pathway is regulated for weeds in any way, how? .........................3 2.2 Q5(a) Do you have any suggestions for improving the effectiveness of regulation for this pathway? .................................................................................... 21 2.3 Q5(c) Do you have any suggestions for managing current and future risks with regard to this pathway?........................................................................................... 36 2.4 Q5(d) Are there any other ways in which management of this pathway is inadequate? ............................................................................................................ 46 2.5 Q6 What is the outlook for this pathway in the future? Please give the reasons for your choice. ....................................................................................................... 54 2.6 Q7 Do you know
    [Show full text]
  • Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai Garden Department
    MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI GARDEN DEPARTMENT To INVITE e- TENDER FOR MAINTENANCE OF VERIOUS GARDENS / PLAY GROUNDS / RECREATION GROUNDS / OPEN SPACES/ TRAFFIC ISLANDS/ CENTRAL MEDIANS ETC FOR THE K/EAST, H/EAST & H WEST ARD IN ZONE-III FOR THE PERIOD OF ONE YEAR OF GARDEN DEPARTMENT Website: (http://portal.mcgm.gov.in/tenders) Office of : Dy. Superitendent of Gardens (Z-III) 4th Floor, Garden Department K/E ward Building, Azad Road , Gunadavali Andheri East , Mumbai- 400069 1 INDEX SECTION DESCRRIPTION PAGE NO. 1 E-TENDER NOTICE 2 ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA 3 DISCLAIMER 4 INTRODUCTION 5 E- TENDER ONLINE SUBMISSION PROCESS 6 INSTRUCTIONS TO APPICANTS 7 SCOPE OF WORK 8 BILL OF QUANTITIES 9 GENERAL CONDITIONS OF CONTRACT 10 SPECTIFICATONS 11 FRAUD AND CORRUPT PRACTICES 12 PRE- BID MEETING 13 LIST OF APPROVED BANKS 14 APPENDIX 2 SECTION 1 E-TENDER NOTICE 3 MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI SUPERINTENDET OF GARDENS TENDER No: DySG/Z-III/103/SGMC dt – 16.04.2021 'E-TENDER NOTICE' To INVITE e- TENDER FOR MAINTENANCE OF VERIOUS GARDENS / PLAY GROUNDS / RECREATION GROUNDS / OPEN SPACES/ TRAFFIC ISLANDS/ CENTRAL MEDIANS ETC FOR THE K/EAST , H/EAST & H WEST WARD IN ZONE-III FOR THE PERIOD OF ONE YEAR OF GARDEN DEPARTMENT. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) invites e-tender to appoint Contractor for the aforementioned work from contractors of repute, multidisciplinary engineering organizations i.e. eminent firm, Proprietary/Partnership Firms/ Private Limited Companies/ Public Limited Companies/Companies registered under the Indian companies’ act 2013 , the contractors registered with the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, (MCGM) in as per applicable Class of Old / New registration and from the contractors/firms equivalent and superior classes registered in Central or State Government/Semi Govt.
    [Show full text]
  • Backyard Habitat Planting Guide
    Backyard Habitat Planting Guide Contents Introduction .......................................................................................................................2 What’s in this guide? .............................................................................................2 About this guide ....................................................................................................2 Backyard Habitat for Wildlife Program ...................................................................3 Importance of bushland in Lake Macquarie........................................................................4 Environmental Sustainability Action Plan (ESAP) ....................................................5 Landcare ...............................................................................................................5 Threats to bushland ...........................................................................................................6 Weeds ...................................................................................................................6 Illegal dumping of garden waste ............................................................................7 Pets and feral animals ...........................................................................................8 Benefits of native gardens ................................................................................................10 Creating a habitat garden ................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]