Minutes of the Annual Conferences of the Methodist Episcopal Church for the Years 1773-1881

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Minutes of the Annual Conferences of the Methodist Episcopal Church for the Years 1773-1881 MINUTES OF THE ANNUAL CONFERENCES OF THE METHODIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH, IN FOR THE YEARS 1773-1 828. VOLUME I. NEW-YORK: PUBLISHED BY T. MASON AND G. LANE, FOR THE METHODIST EPI8COPAL CHURCH, AT THE CONFERENCE OFFICE, 200 MULBERRY-STREEt. J. Collord, Printer. 1840. Minutes for 1823. 393 Rideau, Ezra Heely. Quest. 16. Where and when shall our next Perth, Franklin Metcalf. Conferences be held ? Kingston, Philander Smith. 1. Ohio Conference, at Marietta, Sep Genesee Dist. Goodwin Stoddard, tember 5, 1822. P. Elder. 2. Kentucky Conference, at Lexing Sweden, James S. Lent. ton, September 25, 1822. Batavia, John Arnold, Asa Orcott. 3. Missouri Conference, at St. Louis, Caledonia, Micah Seager, Jasper Ben October 24, 1822. nett. 4. Tennessee Conference, at Ebenezer, Rushford, James Hazen, Philetus Parkus. Green county, near Greenville, East Ten Olean, Warren Bannister. nessee, October 16, 1822. Geneseo, James Gtimore, John Beg 5. Mississippi Conference, at John garly- M'Ray's, Chickasawhay River, Decem BloomfieM, Cyrus Story, Andrew Prindel. ber 5, 1822. Rochester, Elisha House. 6. South Carolina Conference, Savan Orangeville, Wm. Jones, John Casert. nah, Ga., February 20, 1823. Elba, Jonathan E. Davis. 7. Virginia Conference, at Lynchburg, Norwich, James B. Roach. March 19, 1823. Erie Dist. Gleason Fillmore, P. Elder. 8. Baltimore Conference, at Baltimore, French Creek, Josiah Kies. April 17, 1823. Lake, Richard Wright, Sylvester Cary. 9. Philadelphia Conference, at Phila Chetauque, Parker Buel. delphia, May 8, 1823. Eden, Ira Branson, John Copeland. 10. New- York Conference, at Malta, Buffalo, Zechariah Paddock. or Balston, East Line, May 28, 1823. Ridgeway, Isqic Puffer. 11. New-England Conference, at Pro Clarence, Elijah Boardman. vidence, Rhode Island, June 12, 1823. North East, Andrew Peck. 12. Genesee Conference, at Westmore Loring Grant, Conference missionary. land, Oneida county, N. Y., July 15, 1823. MINUTES TAKEN AT THE SEVERAL ANNUAL CONFERENCES OF THE METHODIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH, FOB THE YEAR 1823. Quest. 1. Who are admitted on trial t TENNESSEE CONFERENCE. OHIO CONFERENCE. Wiley Leadbetter, Josiah Smith, John H. Holland, Wm. Johnson, Francis Owen, Billings O. Plimpton, John Crawford, S. Clardy, Carl, Albert G. Richardson, Orin Gilmore, So Benjamin Joseph Loren zo D. Overall, Felix Parker, Luellen lomon Maneer, John Jean, Aaron Wood, Jones, Jones, John Cannon, Jas. James Rowe, George Gatch, James C. Ephraim D. Harris, William Conn, Isaac W. Sul Taylor, Nehemiah B. Griffith, Levi livan, William Millin, Abner Bowen, White, William Westlake— 13. Coleman Harwell, James W. Allen, Jas. KENTUCKY CONFERENCE. Y. Crawford, John W. Witten, William Edwin Ray, John P. Finley, Jonathan Cumming, Isaac Lewis, William Hammet, G. Tucker, James Milligan, Henry W. Arthur M'Clure, Edward T. Perry, Ash Hunt, Uriel Hawe, Major Stanfield, John ley B. Rozzel, Richard F. Jarrett, Nicho Jones, George Stevens—9. las T. Scales, John W. Camp, Thomas MISSOURI CONFERENCE. H. Cannon, Thomas J. Nealy, Thomas Smith, Greenberry Garret, Ambrose F. Samnel Hull, Stephen Beggs, Freder Dreskill, Barton Brown, Josiah Rhoton, ick Leach, Cornelius Ruddle, Lorenzo John White, John Ker— 39. Edwards, John Ingersoll, William Bryant, Thomas Randle, William Smith, William MISSISSIPPI CONFERENCE. Roberts, John Wood, William Ryan, Gil Marcus Henderson, Jonas Westerland, bert Clark, Isaac N. Piggott — 14. William M. Curtis, Edward Harper, John Minutes for 1823. G. Lee, Daniel M'Leod, Elijah B. M'Kay Quest. 2. Who remain on trial ? —7. OHIO CONFERENCE. SOUTH CAROLINA CONFERENCE. Whitefield Hughes, James T. Donahoo, Alexander F. Edwards, Benj. Crane, Richard Brandriff, George M. Mealy, James Tabor, Philip Groover, Isaac John Pardo, John Walker, William Tip Sewell, Samuel Sewell, M'Oarrell Purifoy; ton, William H. Collins, Henry S. Fer- John Slade, Elisha Askew, Chas. Hardy, nandes, William Crawford — 10. David N. Burkhalter, Gaines, Benjamin KENTUCKY CONFERENCE. Sewell Petty, Patrick N. Maddux, Na Peter Acres, Simon than P. Cook, Simeon B. Abbott, Adam Harvey Sawyers, Wyrick, Green W. Huckabee, Joel W. L. Booker, John James, James Ross, Rohbijis, Richard D. Neal, Townsend — 19. George W. James Browden, Lewis Parker, Laban VIRGINIA CONFERENCE. Hughey, William Chambers, John H. Benjamin W. Ogburn, Benton Field, Power, Obadiah Harber, Green Malone, Bazzel Floyd, William W. White, Chris Thomas Joiner, Thomas Atterberry, Caleb Thomas, topher Jesep Carle, Lavellen Crane, Stephen Harber — 18. Jones, Ephraim Jones, Felix Parker,Wm. MISSOURI CONFERENCE. Hammitt, John Cannon, John Kerr, John Chamberlain, James W. Wittin— 13. David Armstrong, James L. Thompson, James Bankson, BALTIMORE CONFERENCE. Isaac Brookfield, John Glanrille, John Joseph White, John Howell, Jesse Blasdell, Anthony W. Cassad, Dennis Chesney, John A. Gera, William L. Gib Willey, Parham Randle, Ebenezer T. son, John Strichler, Dennis M. Parrot, Webster— 11. John Bowen, Francis M'Cartney, Wm. TENNESSEE CONFERENCE. Morgan, Isaac Collins —11. Rufus Leadbetter, Jonas Beloate, John PHILADELPHIA CONFERENCE. Seay, Jacob Hearn, Thomas A. Young, Wesley W. Wallace, Daniel Lambden, German Baker, Finch Scrugfrs, James G. Samuel Doughty, Matthew Sorin, John H. Speer, Abraham Overall, Nathaniel Ludnum, William A. Wiggins, Levin R. Jarrett, John Rains, John Kelly, John Prettyman — 7. Rice, Robert Boyd, Richard Nealy, Na NEW-YORK CONFERENCE. thaniel L. Norval, William Patton, Thos. Brown, Home, David Robert Travis, Jarvis Z. Nichols, J. George B Cam ming, William Elias Tidwell Richard Seaman, John Kennedy, Wm. Carpenter, M. Willett, Parmele Chamberlin, Elbert -22. Osborn, Stephen L. Stillman, Wesley P. MISSISSIPPI CONFERENCE. Lake, William Todd, Elisha Dewey, William Alexander, A. 1. Blackburn, Thomas S. Barrett, Bezaleel Howe — 13. Benjamin F. Liddon, Eugene V. LeVert, NEW-ENGLAND CONFERENCE. Peyton Greaves, John Patton, Francis R. Cheatham, Edmund Pearson, John R. William Dyer, Warren Emerson, Geo. — Weeks, Henry Mayo, Benjamin Jones, Lambuth 9. William Granville, Stephen Puffer, Bar- SOUTH CAROLINA CONFERENCE. zilla Pierce, Caleb D. Rogers, Benjamin Mark Westmoreland, Abner P. Mapley, Paine, Isaac Barker, Hascall Wheelock, Peyton L. Wade, Josiah Freeman, Wm. Silas Frink, Moses Sanderson, Justin Parks, Morgan Turrentine, John Bigby, Amasa Buck, Spaulding, Nathan Howe, John Covington, Edward T. Fitzgerald, John Foster, N. W. Aspenwall, Ezekiel William Knight, Henry W. Leadbetter Robinson, David Richards, William S. —11. Douglass—22. VIRGINIA CONFERENCE. GENESEE CONFERENCE. William D. Goode, Overton Bernard, Johnston, Mark John S. Mitchell, Seth Joshua Leigh, David Ellis, Anson Chad- Philo Young, Barbary, William Griffis, wick, John Craigg, James Morrison, Mann Waldron, Solomon Elias C. Warren, Uriel Dutton—8. Spencer, John Roper, Jacob Pool, Wm. Lull, Joseph Castle, William Ryerson, BALTIMORE CONFERENCE. Robert Courson, David Wright— 15. Philip D. Lipsecum, Henry Sheer, Total admitted on trial— 182. John B. West, William M'Dowell, John Minutes for 1823. 395 N. Stuart, John L. Gibbins, French S. mons, William M'Reynolds, Blachly C. Evans — 7. Wood, John W. M'Reynolds, Luke P. PHILADELPHIA CONFERENCE. Allen, John Denham, Henry Gregg, Isaac Reynolds, James Avis, Francis Wilson, James M'Laurin, Isaac Winner, Jesse Amos Smith — 15. Thompson, Philip Dixon, Joseph Holdich, James B. Ayres, John Henry — 7. MISSOURI CONFERENCE. NEW-YORK CONFERENCE. William Cravens, William W. Redman, H. Humphreys, Bradley Sillick, John Samuel Basset, H. Yredenburg, George — C. Green, Horace Bartlett, Elijah Crane, K. Hester 5. Philo Ferris, Hiram Meeker, Jesse Pome- TENNESSEE CONFERENCE. rov, Charles Pomeroy, Stewart, Quartus John Bradfield, Joseph B. Wynns, Wil Salmon Stebbins, Samuel Covel— 12. liam P. Kendrick, James Cumming, John NEW-ENGLAND CONFERENCE. Paulscll,WyleyB.Peck, Andrew J. Craw Samuel G. Atkins, Aaron D. Sargeant, ford, Benjamin P. Sewell, George W. — Thomas Smith, Henry llulfinch, John N. Morris 9. Maffitt, Joseph Allen, Hezekiah Thatcher, MISSISSIPPI CONFERENCE. Elisha Frink, Ephraim K. Avery, John M. Drake, P. Cook —2. W. Case, William Barstow, Milton Benjamin Henry French, John E. Risley, George Fairbank, SOUTH CAROLINA CONFERENCE. James B. Norris, John H. G. Dow, Ros Archibald Purifoy, Joshua N. Glenn, well Putnam, Phineas Ball, James Tem- John H. Robertson, Daniel G. M'Daniel, pleton, Wilder Mark, Daniel L. Fletcher, Elias Sinclair, Elijah Sinclair, John I. Scott, Newell S. Orange Spauiding, David Triggs, Bond English, Malcolm M'Pher- Leslie, Charles D. Cahoon, Abraham son, John Reynolds— 10. Merril, Caleb Dustin, Samuel Kelly, Eze- kiel W. Stickney, Hershel Foster, Wm. VIRGINIA CONFERENCE. Gardner, John Shaw, Nathaniel P. Deve- William Leigh, Samuel Harrol, Thomas reaux, Melville B. Cox, Otis Williams Crowder, T. B. Humphreys, George W. —35. S. Harper — 5. GENESEE CONFERENCE. BALTIMORE CONFERENCE. Joseph Gardner, George White, Mark Samuel Clark, Charles A. Davis, Charles Preston, William Slater, Charles Wood, Young, William H. Chapman, Shadrach Sylvester Carey, Jonathan M. Brooks, Chaney, Samuel Brysun, Samuel Ellis, Eli Allen, Ephraim Hall, Alexander Er- Norval Wilson, Thos. M. Hudson, Jacob win, John Parker, John Copeland, Joseph R. Shepherd— 10. Atwood, Morgan Sherman, Sophronius Stocking, Jonathan A. Davis, William PHILADELPHIA CONFERENCE. Fowler, Isaac Stone, James B. Roach, Samuel S. Kennard, Eliphalet Reed, John Cassert, Roswell Parker, Squire John Bayne, Daniel Parish, Solomon Hig- Chase, Nathaniel Salisbury, James P. gins
Recommended publications
  • The Methodist Book Concern in the West
    This building as represented above, located at No. 420 Plum Street, Cincinnati, Ohio, was erected in 1916. It is 114 feet on Plum Street, extending east 189 feet to Home Street, and 124 feet on Home Street, and contains approximately 112,000 square feet of floor space. The entire building is occupied by the Book Concern and other Methodist activities. One Hundred Years of Progress An Account of the Ceremonies held at Cincinnati, Ohio, Wednesday, October Sixth, Nineteen Hundred and Twenty, commemora­ ting the establishment of The Methodist Book Concern in the West Edited by CHARLES W. BARNES, D.D. THE METHODIST BOOK CONCERN CINCINNATI, OHIO Contents PAGE THE INVITATION 7 I PROGRAM - 9 II THE HOUSE OF GOOD BOOKS ::; 17 III THE STORY OF THE OCCASION 20 IV THE PROGRAM As RENDERED 30 V SKETCHES OF THE WESTERN PUBLISHING AGENTS 87 VI THE WELFARE WORK AND SOCIAL ACTIVITIES 98 VII THE METHODIST BOOK CONCERN FAMILY 105 October 6th October 6th 1820 1920 ,~HE Publishing Agents and the Book '-' Committee of the Methodist Epis­ copal Church cordially invite you to be pres en t at the exercises commemorating the cen tennial of the establishment of The Meth­ odist Book Concern in the West, to be held at Cincinnati, Ohio, Wednesday, October the sixth, One thousand nine hundred and twenty- -; A luncheon will be served on Wednesday during the noon hour in the coun ting room. At four o'clock Wednesday afternoon each of the sites occupied by The Methodist Book Concern during the century will be visi ted in order.
    [Show full text]
  • Camp Meetings in New England
    Camp Meetings: S. Mount Page 1 of 33 Camp Meetings in New England From Centers of Fiery “Red-hot Methodists” to Interesting Institutes Rev. Sarah Mount Presented to the Oxford Institute August 2007 Camp Meetings: S. Mount Page 2 of 33 The Practice of Camp Meeting Imagine traveling to a lovely three-acre grove of trees, cleared of all underbrush, where tents for sleeping are standing in an oblong square, or a circle. Behind the tents are carriages, wagons and tethered horses. Cooking fires are placed just outside the tent flaps. In the center of the tents, there is stage in front of a semicircle of benches, one section for the women and another for the men. At night this tent ground is illuminated by candles. This is the setting for a typical nineteenth century American camp meeting as described by American Methodist preacher, Jesse Lee. He wrote, We proceed in our religious exercises as follows: soon after the first dawn of day a person walks all round the ground in front of the tents blowing a trumpet as he passes; which is to give the people notice to arise; about ten minutes after the trumpet is blown again with only one long blast; upon which, the people in all their tents begin to sing, and then to pray, either in their tents or at the door of them, as is most convenient. At the rising of the sun a sermon is preached, after which we eat breakfast. We have preaching again at 10 o’clock, and dine about one.
    [Show full text]
  • Joseph Smith Retouched Photograph of a Dagurreotype
    07 the joseph smith retouched photograph0 of a dagurreotypedaguerreotype of a painting or copy of daguerrotypedaguerreotype from the carter collection LDS church archives parting the veil the visions of joseph smith alexander L baugh godgrantedgod granted to the prophetjosephprophet joseph thegiftthe gift of visions joseph received so many that they became almost commonplacecommonplacefor for him the strength and knowledge joseph received through these visions helped him establish the church joseph smith the seer ushered in the dispensation of the fullness of times his role was known and prophesied of anciently the lord promised joseph of egypt that in the last days a choice seer would come through his lineage and would bring his seed to a knowledge of the covenants made to abraham isaac and jacob 2 nephi 37 JST gen 5027 28 that seer will the lord bless joseph prophesied specifically indicating that his name shall be called after me 2 nephi 314 15 see also JST gen 5033 significantly in the revelation received during the organizational meeting of the church on april 61830 the first title given to the first elder was that of seer behold there shall be a record kept and in it thou joseph smith shalt be called a seer a translator a prophet an apostle of jesus christ dacd&c 211 in the book of mormon ammon defined a seer as one who possessed a gift from god to translate ancient records mosiah 813 see also 2811 16 however the feericseeric gift is not limited to translation hence ammon s addi- tional statement that a seer is a revelator and a
    [Show full text]
  • MH-1978-01-Discovery.Pdf (7.915Mb)
    DISCOVERY edited by Kenneth E. Rowe '., '. Philip Embury's Preaching Mission at Chesterfield, New Hampshire by Arthur Bruce Moss 1'-, '1, •• , In the fall of 1772 Philip Embury conducted a preaching mission at Chesterfield, New Hampshire, 1 answering the urgent invitation of James Robertson, one of the early settlers in the interior of Cheshire County. Robertson had been deeply moved by reports he had received concerning the spiritual power of the Methodist society that Embury had established in 1770 in the Salem-Camden Valley area, New York, forty .,~ miles northeast of Albany.2 i i, Embury and a number of Methodist Irish-Palatines3 had removed with their families from New York City to take up a lease-hold upon the I' extensive Duane Tract in Camden Valley.4 Thomas Ashton, a Methodist ~. .. 1. Chesterfield, New Hampshire, is located near Route #9 at about mid-point between the bridge over the Connecticut River from Brattleboro, Vermont, and Lake Spofford en route to Keene. 2. Oran Randall, "History of Chesterfield," 1882, an unpublished manuscript in the Chesterfield Library; GazetteerofCheshire County,N.H., published by Hamilton Childs, Syracuse, NY., 1885; Cole and Baketel, Historyofthe NewHampshire Conference, New York 1929; Articles-"New Hampshire" and "New Hampshire Conference" in Encyclopedia ofWorld Methodism, ed. Nolan B. Harmon, et aI., 2 vols., United Methodist Publishing House, 1975. 3. This was the closely knit group of Irish-Palatine families that had accompanied Philip Embury from Ireland to New York in the 1760's. Upon the arrival of JohnWesley's first missonaries-for:America in 1769--'-Rlchard Boardman, Joseph Pilmore, Robert Williams-Embury felt at full liberty to leave the well-developed society in New York, so thatthey might establish the agricultural community that had been their prime objective in migrating to America.
    [Show full text]
  • “For This Ordinance Belongeth to My House”: the Practice of Baptism for the Dead Outside the Nauvoo Temple
    Alexander L. Baugh: Baptism for the Dead Outside Temples 47 “For This Ordinance Belongeth to My House”: The Practice of Baptism for the Dead Outside the Nauvoo Temple Alexander L. Baugh The Elders’ Journal of July 1838, published in Far West, Missouri, includ- ed a series of twenty questions related to Mormonism. The answers to the questions bear the editorial pen of Joseph Smith. Question number sixteen posed the following query: “If the Mormon doctrine is true, what has become of all those who have died since the days of the apostles?” The Prophet answered, “All those who have not had an opportunity of hearing the gospel, and being administered to by an inspired man in the flesh, must have it hereafter before they can be finally judged.”1 The Prophet’s thought is clear—the dead must have someone in mortality administer the saving ordinances for them to be saved in the kingdom of God. Significantly, the answer given by the Prophet marks his first known statement concerning the doctrine of vicari- ous work for the dead. However, it was not until more than two years later that the principle was put into practice.2 On 15 August 1840, Joseph Smith preached the funeral sermon of Seymour Brunson during which time he declared for the first time the doc- trine of baptism for the dead.3 Unfortunately, there are no contemporary accounts of the Prophet’s discourse. However, Simon Baker was present at the funeral services and later stated that during the meeting the Prophet read extensively from 1 Corinthians 15, then noted a particular widow in the congregation whose son had died without baptism.
    [Show full text]
  • (October 2004) METHODIST PREACHING 1798 -1840
    Methodist History, 43:1 (October 2004) METHODIST PREACHING 1798 -1840: FORM AND FUNCTION FREDERICK V. MILLS, SR. The Methodist Episcopal Church was remarkably successful during the period 1798 - 1840. The period is bounded by the Second Great Awak~niug and the rising debate over slavery, which dwarfed other issues by 1840. Membership grew from 60,169 in 1798 to 795,445 reported by the General Conference of 1840. Institutions of learning, e.g., Augusta College, Madison 1 Collegel Indiana Asbury, Centenary College, LaGrange, Wesleyan, Emory, and Henry College, were founded. By 1833, Methodists had Bible, Sunday School, Tract, and Mission societies. In 1836, the Methodist Publishing House became the Methodist Book Concern. In the writings of the itinerants for the period there was one generally stated reason for this success: "Doubtless our denominational progress is attributable to a great many con­ ditions, but our preaching has been the chief one; it has been related to and has empowered all others." "Asbury and his corps of Circuit-Riders believed that the nation could actually be reformed and the world saved by the 'foolishness of preaching' ." 1 A primary condition that fostered Methodism's growth was the revival­ ism of America's Second Great .Awakening which extended at least from 1797 to 1817. An eastern phase revolved around Yale College and President Timothy Dwight, while a western phase was associated with the Cane Ridge, Kentucky meeting of 1801. The innovation of the frontier camp meeting was adopted by the Methodists and in 1807 Francis Asbury wrote to Edward Dromgoole, "camp meetings prevail generally.
    [Show full text]
  • Joseph Smith's Lessons on Leadership
    Education Week 2015 Prepare for “Joseph Smith’s Lessons on Leadership” Taught by Robert Spiel Retrieved from: http://josephsmith.net/article/leading-with-love?lang=eng Introduction Joseph Smith was a remarkable leader. He served as President of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints; mayor of Nauvoo, one of the largest cities in Illinois; lieutenant-general of the Nauvoo Legion; and in 1844 he was a candidate for President of the United States. What set Joseph Smith apart from other dynamic leaders was the source of his teachings: the God of Heaven. "The best way to obtain truth 1 and wisdom," he taught, "is not to ask it from books, but to go to God in prayer, and obtain divine teaching." 2 Joseph led with love. He recognized the worth of every soul as a child of God. When asked why so many followed him, he replied: "It is because I possess the principle of love. All I can offer the world is a good heart and a good hand." 3 The Prophet refused to place himself above others. Rather, as he humbly said, "I love to wait upon the Saints, and be a servant to all, hoping that I may be exalted in the due time of the Lord." 4 Bereft of pride, 5 Joseph personified the Lord's counsel: "Whosoever will be great among you, . shall be servant of all." 6 Joseph Smith Quotes Nothing is so much calculated to lead people to forsake sin as to take them by the hand, and watch over them with tenderness.
    [Show full text]
  • Methodist Worship on the Delmarva Peninsula, 1800-1850
    Methodist Hist01y, 40:2 (January 2002) METHODIST WORSHIP ON THE DELMARVA PENINSULA, 1800-1850 AS WITNESSED IN THE LIFE AND WORK OF JOSHUA THOMAS, "PARSON OF THE ISLANDS" KIMBERLY BRACKEN LONG I Students of Methodist history have long debated the origins of Ameri­ can Methodism. Was it Philip Embury who began the first society in New York, or does the honor lie with Robert Strawbridge and his fellow Methodist in Frederick County, Maryland? This dispute has overshadowed a more important question, argues Russell Richey, namely, how Methodism has been shaped by regional particularities. 1 In Richey's view, it was the Chesapeake region-the Delmarva (Dela­ ware-Maryland~Virginia) Peninsula as well as the western shore of the Chesapeake Bay, including Baltimore-that ''gave color to the whole move­ ment." Noting that Freeborn Garrettson, whose western shore society was one of the first on the continent, called the area "a nursery" of Methodism, Richey asserts that an exploration of Chesapeake religion is essential to understand how the movement took shape and spread in the American con­ text.2 Denying the commonly held assumptions that (1) American religion has only Puritan roots, (2) that southern religion (which he argues Methodism is) was primarily individualistic in focus, and that (3) Ainerican Methodism was a monolithic movement fron1 the start, Richey claims that Methodism in the United States was shaped in a particular way because of its Chesapeake roots. He proposes "nine facets of Chesapeake religion and later of American Methodism" 3-pluralism, revivalism, pietism, holiness, ambivalence about race, bi-raciality, denominationalism, roles of womert, and itinerancy-and asserts that each facet expressed characte1istics of Wesleyanism in a uniquely Chesapeake way.
    [Show full text]
  • 1864 Minutes of the Annual Conferences of the Methodist Episcopal Church, South, for the Year 1864 Methodist Episcopal Church, South
    Asbury Theological Seminary ePLACE: preserving, learning, and creative exchange Conference Journals Methodist Episcopal Church, South 2017 1864 Minutes of the Annual Conferences of the Methodist Episcopal Church, South, for the Year 1864 Methodist Episcopal Church, South Follow this and additional works at: http://place.asburyseminary.edu/mechsouthconfjournals Part of the Appalachian Studies Commons, Christian Denominations and Sects Commons, and the Genealogy Commons Recommended Citation Methodist Episcopal Church, South, "1864 Minutes of the Annual Conferences of the Methodist Episcopal Church, South, for the Year 1864" (2017). Conference Journals. 20. http://place.asburyseminary.edu/mechsouthconfjournals/20 This Periodical/Journal is brought to you for free and open access by the Methodist Episcopal Church, South at ePLACE: preserving, learning, and creative exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Conference Journals by an authorized administrator of ePLACE: preserving, learning, and creative exchange. MINUTES OF THE ANNUAL CONFERENCES OF THE FOR THE YEAR 1864 . • I •• ,. ~lu~billtt ~tnn.: SOUTHERN !\IETHODIST PUBLISHING HOUSE. 1870. BISHOPS OF THE lIETHODIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH, SOUTH. JQSHUA SOULE, D. D., NASHVILLE, T ENN. JAMES OSGOOD ANDRE 'V, D. D., SUMMERFIELD, ALA. ROBERT P ArNE, D. D., ABERDEEN, MISS. GEORGE FOSTER PIERC1E, D. D., CULVERTON, GA. JOHN EARLY, D. D., LYNCHBURG, VA. HUBBARD HINDE KAVANAUGH, D. D., VERSAILLES, Ky. MINUTES. '1. I.-KENTUCKY CONFERENCE. HELD AT MAYSVILLE, Ky., September 7-12, 1864. J. C. HARRISON, Prewidentj DANIEL STEVENSON, Secretary. QUESTION 1. Who are admitted on trial? William Atherton. 1. ANSWER. Daniel M. Bonner. 1. No memoir. Ques. 2. Who remain on trial? Ques. 15. Are all the preachers blameless in J.
    [Show full text]
  • Abraham's Uncircumcised Children
    ABRAHAM’S UNCIRCUMCISED CHILDREN: THE ENOCHIC PRECEDENT FOR PAUL’S PARADOXICAL CLAIM IN GALATIANS 3:29 by Amy Genevive Dibley A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Joint Doctor of Philosophy with Graduate Theological Union in Near Easter Religions in the Graduate Division of the University of California at Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor LeAnn Snow Flesher, Chair Professor Daniel Boyarin Professor Eugene Eung-Chun Park Professor Yair Zakovitch Professor Erich S. Gruen Fall 2013 ABSTRACT Abraham’s Uncircumcised Children: The Enochic Precedent for Paul’s Paradoxical Claim in Galatians 3:29 by Amy Genevive Dibley Joint Doctor of Philosophy with Graduate Theological Union in Near Easter Religions in the Graduate Division University of California, Berkeley Professor LeAnn Snow Flesher, Chair This study proposes the Book of Dreams as the precedent for Paul’s program of gentile reclamation qua gentiles predating the composition of the Epistles by two centuries. 1 Dedication To my husband Peter, for whom the words loving and supportive and partnership hardly begin to encompass the richness of our journey together through this process. For our girls, Langsea and Lucia (5 and 4 years old as I submit this), who when playing “mommy” pause from dressing and feeding baby dolls to write their own dissertations. In thanks to the women of First Covenant Church in Rockford, Illinois and Kerry Staurseth (Langsea’s godmother) who watched those most precious to me so that this first child could at last be born, proving that it also takes a village to write a dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • United Methodist Bishops Page 17 Historical Statement Page 25 Methodism in Northern Europe & Eurasia Page 37
    THE NORTHERN EUROPE & EURASIA BOOK of DISCIPLINE OF THE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH 2009 Copyright © 2009 The United Methodist Church in Northern Europe & Eurasia. All rights reserved. United Methodist churches and other official United Methodist bodies may reproduce up to 1,000 words from this publication, provided the following notice appears with the excerpted material: “From The Northern Europe & Eurasia Book of Discipline of The United Methodist Church—2009. Copyright © 2009 by The United Method- ist Church in Northern Europe & Eurasia. Used by permission.” Requests for quotations that exceed 1,000 words should be addressed to the Bishop’s Office, Copenhagen. Scripture quotations, unless otherwise noted, are from the New Revised Standard Version of the Bible, copyright © 1989 by the Division of Christian Education of the National Council of the Churches of Christ in the USA. Used by permission. Name of the original edition: “The Book of Discipline of The United Methodist Church 2008”. Copyright © 2008 by The United Methodist Publishing House Adapted by the 2009 Northern Europe & Eurasia Central Conference in Strandby, Denmark. An asterisc (*) indicates an adaption in the paragraph or subparagraph made by the central conference. ISBN 82-8100-005-8 2 PREFACE TO THE NORTHERN EUROPE & EURASIA EDITION There is an ongoing conversation in our church internationally about the bound- aries for the adaptations of the Book of Discipline, which a central conference can make (See ¶ 543.7), and what principles it has to follow when editing the Ameri- can text (See ¶ 543.16). The Northern Europe and Eurasia Central Conference 2009 adopted the following principles. The examples show how they have been implemented in this edition.
    [Show full text]
  • 26 Repairing Episcopacy by Tracking That of Bishop Christian Newcomer Russell E. Richey from “Wir Sind Brüder!” to “Can W
    Methodist History, 57:1 & 2 (October 2018 & January 2019) REPAIRING EPISCOPACY BY TRACKING THAT OF BISHOP CHRISTIAN NEWCOMER Russell E. Richey From “Wir sind Brüder!” to “Can We become Brothers?” We invited our beloved Brother Newcomer to a seat in our conference as your messenger, and he is doubly dear to us as the messenger of such joyful tidings of brotherly love from you. “How beautiful upon the mountains are the feet of all the messengers of mercy and love and peace and good will.[”]1 So the 1811 Methodist Episcopal Church (MEC) Baltimore Conference received Christian Newcomer. The powerhouse, dominant, and controlling conference—the Vatican of early Methodism— imbedded this tribute within its formal response to an overture concerning union between the two church- es, an overture which Newcomer had conveyed. For the next three years, the Baltimore Minutes recognized Newcomer’s ambassadorial role and bur- dened him with responses to carry back. He had functioned in both mes- sage-bearing regards as well in the 1809 and 1810 United Brethren (UB) overtures, though, the Methodist Minutes do not so indicate. The encoun- ter for 1813—though it proved to be the last hopeful exchange—effectively ended the Newcomer-led unitive efforts. He described the 1813 events in some detail in his journal:2 [August] 25th—I preached at old Mr. Mohn’s, from Psalm 34, v. 20; rode to Peter Seitz’s, where our Conference is to be held. 26th—This forenoon the session of our Conference commenced; upwards of twenty preachers were present; poor unworthy me was elected their president.
    [Show full text]