Central Bank Intervention and Exchange Rates: the Case of Sweden

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Central Bank Intervention and Exchange Rates: the Case of Sweden A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Aguilar, Javiera; Nydahl, Stefan Working Paper Central bank intervention and exchange rates: The case of Sweden Sveriges Riksbank Working Paper Series, No. 54 Provided in Cooperation with: Central Bank of Sweden, Stockholm Suggested Citation: Aguilar, Javiera; Nydahl, Stefan (1998) : Central bank intervention and exchange rates: The case of Sweden, Sveriges Riksbank Working Paper Series, No. 54, Sveriges Riksbank, Stockholm This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/83039 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu &HQWUDO%DQN,QWHUYHQWLRQDQG([FKDQJH5DWHV7KH&DVHRI 6ZHGHQ* Javiera Aguilara and Stefan Nydahlb This version: June 14, 1998 $EVWUDFW This paper examines the effect of the Riksbank’s currency market interventions on the level and the volatility of the USD/SEK and DEM/SEK exchange rates between 1993 and 1996. To model volatility both GARCH models and implied volatilities from currency options are used. Some support is found for the idea that interventions affect the exchange rate level during certain sub periods but overall the results are weak. Furthermore, in line with the findings for other countries, little empirical support is found for the hypothesis that central bank intervention systematically decreases exchange rate volatility. ;IEVIQSWXKVEXIJYPXS4IXIV)RKPYRH&N¸VR,ERWWSR,ERW0MRHFIVK4IXIV7IPPMRERHIWTIGMEPP]%RHIVW :VIHMRJSVGSQQIRXW'SQQIRXWJVSQWIQMREVTEVXMGMTERXWEX7ZIVMKIW6MOWFERO[IVIEPWSLIPTJYPMR MQTVSZMRKXLITETIV1SWX[SVOSRXLMWTETIV[EWHSRI[LMPIXLIWIGSRHEYXLSVLIPHERMRXIVRWLMTEXXLI 6MOWFERO,IXLEROWXLI6MOWFEROJSVJMRERGMEPWYTTSVXHYVMRKXLMWTIVMSH8LIZMI[WI\TVIWWIHLIVIEVI XLSWISJXLIEYXLSVWERHHSRSXRIGIWWEVMP]VIJPIGXXLSWISJ7ZIVMKIW6MOWFERO E1SRIXEV]ERH)\GLERKI6EXI4SPMG](ITEVXQIRX7ZIVMKIW6MOWFERO F(ITEVXQIRXSJ)GSRSQMGW9TTWEPE9RMZIVWMX] ,QWURGXFWLRQ During the last decades economists have changed their views regarding the effects of foreign exchange market interventions on the exchange rate. Under the Bretton Woods system of fixed exchange rates, interventions were used frequently to maintain the exchange rate within prescribed margins. After the breakdown of the Bretton Woods system in 1973 the magnitude of interventions initially increased. In the early 1980s, the Reagan administration viewed interventions as both costly and inefficient and adopted more of a laissez-faire approach towards foreign-exchange markets. European central banks however continued to intervene to keep their currencies within the bands prescribed by the Exchange Rate Mechanism (ERM). The U.S. skepticism against interventions was partly based on the fact that research in the late 1970s seemed to show that exchange markets are efficient. Most empirical studies failed to find effects of interventions on the exchange rate. However even during this period some economists stressed that foreign exchange rate markets do not work as commodity markets. They claimed that in exchange rate markets without interventions or restrictions on asset holdings equilibrium exchange rates will not be determined (Wallace, 1978). During the first half of the 1980s the dollar appreciated by approximately 50 percent in nominal terms. When the Congress threatened to adopt severe protectionistic measures the Federal Reserve began to intervene, but this time with the help from the G5 countries. Following the perceived success of these interventions economists began to reassess the effectiveness of interventions. A majority of the new studies produced concluded, in line with the earlier results, that interventions effects on the exchange rate are minor at most. Still, most central banks continue to be active in the foreign exchange market. One explanation could be that countries with floating exchange rates usually try to decrease exchange rate volatility rather than move the level of the exchange rate. Indeed in the IMF Executive Board’s 1977 guiding principles for intervention policy it is explicitly stated that countries should use interventions to decrease volatility in exchange rates (Dominguez, 1996). A major part of the studies in this area of research is concerned with the effects of interventions on the DEM/USD and JPY/USD exchange rates. Very little has been done for other currencies. As pointed by Edison (1993) one main reason for the lack of empirical studies for other countries is that it is hard to get access to good data for interventions. In this paper we study the effect of sterilized interventions on the Swedish krona from 1993 to 1996 using unique daily data on actual interventions made by the Riksbank. After a period of severe speculative attacks against the Swedish krona the Riksbank let the krona start to float in November 1992. This was the first time since the thirties that Sweden experienced a floating exchange rate regime. It is of interest to explore the effects of interventions conducted under a floating exchange rate regime in a small open economy. The paper is organized as follows: Section 2 describes theory and different channels through which interventions could affect exchange rates. Section 3 presents empirical results. We test the effects of interventions both on the exchange rate level and on the exchange rate volatility. Section 4 concludes. 7KHRU\RIVWHULOL]HGLQWHUYHQWLRQV The Riksbank has during the period investigated in this paper neutralized the money stock effect of its interventions, i.e. used so called sterilized interventions. It is generally accepted among economists that nonsterilized interventions affect exchange rates in the same way domestic open- market operations. Nonsterilized interventions change the stock of base money and thus monetary aggregates and interest rates. The effects of sterilized interventions are however more controversial because the monetary base is not altered; the central bank make an offsetting transaction through an open market purchase or sale of domestic government securities or by granting more or less credit to the commercial banks. Thus a sterilized intervention simply alters the currency composition of domestic and foreign assets of the private sector portfolio investments but leaves the money supply unchanged. It is common practice among central banks to neutralize the money market effect of interventions in order to let exchange rate policy not interfere with domestic monetary policy. There are many theories on the scope of foreign exchange market intervention. For a comprehensive survey we refer the interested to Almekinders (1995, Ch.2). Here we take the asset market view of exchange rates as a simple formal framework to discuss the different channels through which sterilized intervention may affect the exchange rate. Following the standard asset pricing model approach to exchange rates the following process is considered for the exchange rate, VI=+α (VΩ − V WW[] WWWW()+1 (1) V I ( where W is the (log) exchange rate at time t, W represents the current period "fundamentals", W is the expectations operator and ΩW is the information set in period t. Hence the exchange rate in period t is determined by the fundamentals in period t and the expected capital gain, (VΩ − V WW()+1 W W , of holding the currency until the next period. Equation (1) can be rewritten as, 1 α VI(V= + ()Ω (2) WWWWW11+ α + α +1 i.e. a stochastic difference equation. The general solution to equation (2) is given by a set of solutions that each may be expressed as, * VVEWWW=+ (3) + α * 1 where V is the fundamental value and E is a rational bubble satisfying, (E[]Ω = E. W W WW+1 α W * VW is the unique solution to (2) under the assumption of no bubbles. To see this we solve equation (2) recursively , M 7 + 1 7 α α 1 V(I(V= ∑ ()ΩΩ+ () W WWMW+ WW7++1 W (4) 11++α M α 1+ α α 7 +1 Under the assumption that ( ()V Ω = 0 , the unique solution to (2) is, lim W W +7 +1 W 7 →∞ 1+α M 1 ∞ α V* = ∑ ( ()I Ω (5) W +α +α W W+ M W 1 M=0 1 Hence the solution for VWcan be written as, M 1 ∞ α α V = ∑ ( ()I Ω + ([]E Ω (6) W +α +α W W+ M W +α W+1 W 1 M=0 1 1 where the exchange rate is divided into two terms, the expected present value of future fundamentals and a bubble. Note the implication of the second term; for a bubble to survive it must reflect the expectation that it will continue to expand in the following period. We use the expression in (6) as a starting point to discuss how interventions can affect the exchange rate trough different
Recommended publications
  • Sweden's Convergence Programme 2014
    Sweden’s convergence programme 2014 Sweden’s Convergence Programme 2014 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 5 1 Economic policy framework and targets ........................................................ 7 1.1 The fiscal policy framework .............................................................................. 7 1.2 The objective of monetary policy ................................................................... 14 1.3 The Government’s economic policy ............................................................... 16 1.4 Monetary policy ............................................................................................... 29 2 The macroeconomic trend ......................................................................... 31 2.1 International and financial economy .............................................................. 31 2.2 The Swedish economy ..................................................................................... 32 2.3 Potential macroeconomic imbalances ............................................................. 33 3 General government finances .................................................................... 37 3.1 Accounting principles ...................................................................................... 37 3.2 The development of the general government finances .................................. 37 3.3 Net financial wealth and consolidated gross debt .........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Connectedness Between Exchange Rates: How Machine Learning Opens up Fresh Insights Timo Bettendorf and Reinhold Heinlein
    Research Brief 28th edition – September 2019 Connectedness between exchange rates: how machine learning opens up fresh insights Timo Bettendorf and Reinhold Heinlein Are the exchange rates between certain currencies more What our study shows is that the results of such an estimation closely connected than those of other currencies? Answers depend, in some cases considerably, on how the contempo- to this question can be provided by econometric methods. A raneous relationships between the time series are incorporated. new study shows how machine learning can deliver useful Contemporaneous causal structures, especially, had not been insights into this issue. fully taken on board in earlier studies, which is why in our study previously used procedures led to at times considerably Exchange rates are of major importance for macroeconomic biased results. We solve this problem by using an algorithm developments and are often a topic of political debate. In a for machine learning (see Spirtes et al., 2001). This algorithm recent study (Bettendorf and Heinlein, 2019), we study how uses statistical methods to search for contemporaneous causal bilateral exchange rates between various currencies are con- structures between the variables. These causal structures are nected. We show that the US dollar and, surprisingly, the thus obtained from the data and not, as in other studies, Norwegian krone exert a relatively strong influence on other defined by the user. This means that our study generally models currencies. Such a causal relationship between two currencies contemporaneous causal effects better than previously ap- exists if the pattern of one currency’s exchange rate can be plied procedures.
    [Show full text]
  • Ibor Transition Clifford Chance | 3
    IIFM AWARENESS SEMINAR ON ISLAMIC FINANCE GLOBAL BENCHMARK REFORM HABIB MOTANI CLIFFORD CHANCE SEPTEMBER 2019 1 THE BACKGROUND TO IBOR REFORM AND RECENT DEVELOPMENTS 2 1 ALTERNATIVES TO LIBOR Alternative Publication Overnight Rate Term Rate Currency Administrator Working Group Secured? Description Reference Rate time Available? Available? GBP Unsecured overnight rate Reformed based on the rate at which Working Group on SONIA (Sterling Bank of 09:00 GMT, interest is paid on sterling Sterling Risk-Free Overnight Index England T+1 short-term wholesale funds P Reference Rates Planned Q1 2020 Average) where credit, liquidity and other risks are minimal USD SOFR (Secured Federal Alternative Secured rate based on Overnight Reserve Bank Reference Rates P 08:00 ET, T+1 transactions in the US P Financing Rate) of New York Committee (ARRC) Treasury repo market Planned H2 2021 JPY Unsecured rate based on TONAR (Tokyo Study Group on 10:00 JST, uncollateralised overnight Overnight Bank of Japan Risk-Free T+1 call rate market P Average Rate) Reference Rates Under consideration transactions CHF National Working SARON (Sales 12:00, 16:00 Group on Swiss Secured rate based on data A robust Average Rate SIX Exchange and 18:00 CET Franc Reference P from the Swiss repo market P derivatives-based Overnight) same day Rates term rate is unlikely to be feasible €STR Euro Unsecured rate to reflect (European Working Group on wholesale euro unsecured Short-Term Euro European Risk-Free 09:00 CET, overnight borrowing Rate) – Central Bank Reference Rates for
    [Show full text]
  • Relevant Market/ Region Commercial Transaction Rates
    Last Updated: 31, May 2021 You can find details about changes to our rates and fees and when they will apply on our Policy Updates Page. You can also view these changes by clicking ‘Legal’ at the bottom of any web-page and then selecting ‘Policy Updates’. Domestic: A transaction occurring when both the sender and receiver are registered with or identified by PayPal as residents of the same market. International: A transaction occurring when the sender and receiver are registered with or identified by PayPal as residents of different markets. Certain markets are grouped together when calculating international transaction rates. For a listing of our groupings, please access our Market/Region Grouping Table. Market Code Table: We may refer to two-letter market codes throughout our fee pages. For a complete listing of PayPal market codes, please access our Market Code Table. Relevant Market/ Region Rates published below apply to PayPal accounts of residents of the following market/region: Market/Region list Vietnam (VN) Commercial Transaction Rates When you buy or sell goods or services, make any other commercial type of transaction, send or receive a charity donation or receive a payment when you “request money” using PayPal, we call that a “commercial transaction”. Receiving international transactions Where sender’s market/region is Rate Outside of Vietnam (VN) Commercial Transactions 4.40% + fixed fee Fixed fee for commercial transactions (based on currency received) Currency Fee Australian dollar 0.30 AUD Brazilian real 0.60 BRL Canadian dollar
    [Show full text]
  • An Economic Analysis of the Swedish Euro Referendum of 2003
    Number 296 – December 2007 The euro – what's in it for me? An Economic Analysis of the Swedish Euro Referendum of 2003 by Lars Jonung Directorate General for Economic and Financial Affairs and Jonas Vlachos University of Stockholm Economic Papers are written by the Staff of the Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs, or by experts working in association with them. The “Papers” are intended to increase awareness of the technical work being done by the staff and to seek comments and suggestions for further analyses. Views expressed represent exclusively the positions of the author and do not necessarily correspond to those of the European Commission. Comments and enquiries should be addressed to the: European Commission Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs Publications BU-1 B - 1049 Brussels, Belgium ISSN 1016-8060 (print) ISSN 1725-3187 (online) ©European Communities, 2007 The euro – what's in it for me? An Economic Analysis of the Swedish Euro Referendum of 2003 By Lars Jonung and Jonas Vlachos∗ December, 2007 Abstract: The Swedish referendum on the euro in September 2003 is an exceptional event for researchers of monetary unions and of European economic integration. Voters chose between maintaining the domestic currency, the krona, and replacing it with the euro, the single currency of the European Union. The referendum revealed significant dividing lines between Yes- and No-voters in areas such as income, education, sex, employment, geographical location and industrial structure. The aim of this study is to explain the large differences in voting behaviour. The empirical analysis of the referendum outcome is based on the traditional optimum currency area (OCA) approach, merged with an account of the distributional effects of Swedish membership of the euro area as they were perceived by the voters.
    [Show full text]
  • The Long-Term Budget of the European Union
    2015:1op Same, same but different The Nordic EU members during the crisis THE EU´S POLITICAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL SYSTEM Pernilla Bäckman (ed.) Julie Hassing Nielsen Juha Jokela Jakob Lewander (ed.) Göran von Sydow (ed.) Pernilla Bäckman (ed.), Julie Hassing Nielsen, Juha Jokela, Jakob Lewander (ed.) and Göran von Sydow (ed.) Same, same but different The Nordic EU members during the crisis – SIEPS 2015:1op – SIEPS 2015:1op Same, same but different 1 Occasional Paper No. 1op April 2015 Published by the Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies This publication is available at www.sieps.se The opinions expressed in the publication are those of the authors. Cover design by LuxLucid, Stockholm Typeset and printed in Stockholm by EO Grafiska AB ISSN 1651-8071 ISBN 91-85129-92-5 2 Same, same but different SIEPS 2015:1op Preface The euro crisis has marked change in European political systems and governance. The implications of the financial meltdown for labour markets and for sovereign debts have been immense, and, in turn, they have brought about changes in the EUs infrastructure and have deepened the commitment to European cooperation, such as the fiscal compact, the ESM and the European semester. At the same time, however, the effects of the crisis have been asymmetrically dispersed among - and within - the EU member states, where the ideas, realities and benefits of the EU are receiving new political and electoral focus. In this set of unusual circumstances, the perceptions and conceptualisations of European political cooperation may pass through periods of reaction, and possibly, more long-term changes in the definition of EU membership.
    [Show full text]
  • The Riksbank's Role in Providing a Reference Rate
    Reg no. 2019-00912 The Riksbank’s role in providing a reference rate September 2019 THE RIKSBANK’S ROLE IN PROVIDING A REFERENCE RATE 1 The Riksbank’s role in providing a reference rate A consultation from the Riksbank, September 2019 This document presents the work of developing an alternative reference interest rate (reference rate) in Sweden and the reasons that make it appropriate for the Riksbank to be the actor that provides such a reference rate. The aim of this consultation is to gather the opinions of other public authorities, financial institutions and other interested parties on the standpoints expressed. More specifically, the Riksbank is looking for opinions on the arguments used to suggest that the Riksbank would be an appropriate actor to provide a reference rate for the very shortest maturity in Swedish kronor. Any comments on the arguments and standpoints presented in this consultation can be submitted to the Riksbank at [email protected] or sent to Sveriges riksbank, 103 37 Stockholm by no later than 15 November 2019. A summary of responses to the consultation will be compiled and published on www.riksbank.se. Thank you for your participation! 2 SUMMARY Summary Reference rates fulfil a central and important function in the financial system. This applies not least to the reference rates known as ‘IBORs’ (Interbank Offered Rates). However, due to events connected to the financial crisis of 2007–2008 and the Libor scandal of 2012, confidence in these reference rates declined. Since this, the frameworks around reference rates have been reformed. New recommendations and requirements have been added, calculation methods for several IBORs have been reviewed and, around the world, work is under way to develop new, alternative reference rates.
    [Show full text]
  • Eurozone All Quarterly Global Charts Are Located Here
    All quarterly Global charts are located here: S:\PUBLICATIONS\Commentaries - Quarterly\Euro_Global_UK Charts\2016Q1\Graphics Support 3Q Investment Report 2017 Eurozone Interest Rate Trends Central Bank Watch Eurozone yields traded in a range of 25 bps over the course of the quarter, The ECB left monetary policy unchanged, despite revising its growth fore- before ending the period marginally lower. casts up and its inflation forecasts down. President Draghi signaled that the future direction of the Asset Purchase Program would be announced at the October meeting. 2.0 120 110 1.5 30-Year 100 BoJ 90 Forecast 1.0 80 70 0.5 10-Year 60 50 0.0 40 ECB German Bund Yield (%) Yield German Bund 5-Year Balance Sheet (% of GDP) 30 -0.5 20 10 Fed -1.0 0 Mar 16 Jun 16 Sep 16 Dec 16 Mar 17 Jun 17 Sep 17 200920082007 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Source: Bloomberg Source: Bloomberg, Western Asset, OECD. As of 30 Sep 17 Peripheral European Government Spreads Eurozone Growth and Inflation Peripheral bond spreads were marginally wider over the quarter as political The eurozone economy continued to strengthen as both survey and real uncertainty in Spain increased ahead of the “illegal” referendum on Catalonian economy data surprised to the upside. Headline inflation softened as core independence. inflation remained around 1.1%. 2.5 4 3 Eurozone CPI 2.0 2 Italy 1 1.5 0 Year-over-Year (%) Year-over-Year -1 1.0 10-Yr Govt Spread Over Germany (%) Germany Over Spread Govt 10-Yr Spain -2 Eurozone Real GDP 0.5 -3 2014 2015 2016 2017 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Source: Bloomberg Source: Bloomberg Credit Excess Returns Currency Corporate bond spreads tightened over the quarter with financial-related The euro strengthened in response to stronger economic data and general issuers outperforming.
    [Show full text]
  • Mastercard Response to ECB Public Consultation on a Digital Euro
    2021-01-12 Mastercard response to ECB public consultation on a digital euro Mastercard welcomes the opportunity to share our views in the ECB’s public consultation on a digital euro. The rapid pace of technological change, including the advent of crypto-currencies and stablecoins, has led policymakers around the globe to consider the impact of this transformation on the future of payments and to ask themselves how to best safeguard the interests of consumers and businesses. Mastercard is committed to supporting central banks in their chosen path to payment system modernisation; including the development of a central bank digital currency (CBDC) where this is relevant. Having operated multiple secure, safe, scalable payment networks around the world for many years, Mastercard is investing in a range of cutting-edge approaches to payment infrastructure and services, including the use of blockchain. We are committed to bringing that expertise to bear in support of the design, testing, and deployment of CBDC networks where central banks choose to pursue their development. We have responded to the questions raised by the ECB in the document below. In summary: • We strongly concur with the ECB’s stated view that “supervised private intermediaries should have the opportunity to use their expertise and participate in the provision of [digital euro] payment services.” Open and competitive payment ecosystems are critical to enabling access, adoption, and use of payment options that serve a wide range of user needs and preferences. Moreover, ongoing payments innovation, expanded financial inclusion, and the efficiency of national and international payment flows all depend on vibrant private sector competition in the provision of payments.
    [Show full text]
  • UK Interest Rates
    UK Interest Rates An explanation of the method used to calculate final interest rates that apply to the interest bearing accounts that you hold with the UK Branch of Silicon Valley Bank is available at https://www.svb.com/uk/client-service/uk-interest-rates/. The interest rate is calculated by adding the Margin Rate applicable to the relevant currency to the Index Rate. If the interest rate is less than 0% then an interest rate of 0% will be applied, unless a Deposit Interest Charge applies (See Section C). The calculation method for payment of interest on credit and debit balances depends on the currency of the account. For the following currencies, we will calculate interest daily over a 360 day year: Australian Dollar, Canadian Dollar, Danish Krone, Euro, Israeli Shekel, Japanese Yen, Norwegian Krone, New Zealand Dollar, Swedish Krona, Swiss Franc and United States Dollar. For the following currencies, we will calculate interest daily over a 365 day year: Chinese Renminbi, Great Britain Pound, Hong Kong Dollar, Singapore Dollar and South African Rand. SECTION A – STERLING CURRENT PLUS ACCOUNT CURRENCY INDEX RATE MARGIN INTEREST RATE BRITISH POUND GBP 0.75% -2.00% 0.00% GBP-denominated Current Plus Accounts are the only current accounts which may pay interest. All other current accounts are non-interest bearing. SECTION B – CORPORATE DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS Credit balances in the following currencies will incur a Deposit Interest Charge if the credit balances exceed designated thresholds: Swiss Franc, Danish Krone, European Union Euro, Japanese Yen and Swedish Krona. See Section C for more details.
    [Show full text]
  • The E-Krona and the Macroeconomy
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Armelius, Hanna; Boel, Paola; Claussen, Carl Andreas; Nessén, Marianne Article — Published Version The e-krona and the macroeconomy Sveriges Riksbank Economic Review Suggested Citation: Armelius, Hanna; Boel, Paola; Claussen, Carl Andreas; Nessén, Marianne (2018) : The e-krona and the macroeconomy, Sveriges Riksbank Economic Review, ISSN 0348-6583, Sveriges Riksbank, Stockholm, Iss. 3, pp. 43-65, https://www.riksbank.se/globalassets/media/rapporter/pov/artiklar/engelska/2018/181105/20183- the-e-krona-and-the-macroeconomy.pdf This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/232929 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open
    [Show full text]
  • Sweden Joins ECB's Instant Payments Settlement Platform
    Press release 3 April 2020 Sweden joins ECB’s instant payments settlement platform ECB and the Sveriges Riksbank conclude agreement on settlement of electronic payments in Swedish krona on the Eurosystem’s real-time infrastructure, TIPS Sweden is European frontrunner in use of instant payments ECB President Christine Lagarde says cooperation of central bank community in Europe works effectively - also in times of crisis Today, the European Central Bank (ECB), the Eurosystem and Sveriges Riksbank concluded a cooperation agreement offering Sweden access to the Eurosystem’s TARGET Instant Payment Settlement (TIPS) to support the Swedish instant payment service, called RIX-INST. Based on this agreement, electronic payments made in Swedish krona can be settled on the settlement platform for instant payments operated by the Eurosystem. Payments will be cleared under the agreement as of May 2022. TIPS enables providers of payment services to transfer and settle their customers’ funds in real time, around the clock, every day of the year, and it settles the payments in central bank money. It has been in use in the euro area since November 2018 to settle instant payments in euro. It had been conceived from the outset to also be able to settle other currencies. Sweden is one of the most advanced European countries in terms of use of instant payments, with significant daily volumes. Currently, the daily average number of instant payments in Sweden is 1.5 million per day. The agreement is being signed by ECB President Christine Lagarde, the Governors of the Eurosystem’s 19 national central banks, and Sveriges Riksbank Governor Stefan Ingves.
    [Show full text]