The Molecular Wake-Up Call It Is 50 Years Since Arvid Carlsson Showed Dopamine to Be a Neurotransmitter

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Molecular Wake-Up Call It Is 50 Years Since Arvid Carlsson Showed Dopamine to Be a Neurotransmitter NEWS FEATURE NATURE|Vol 447|24 May 2007 The molecular wake-up call It is 50 years since Arvid Carlsson showed dopamine to be a neurotransmitter. Alison Abbott profiles a chemical and its champion. hey were conscious but you wouldn’t know it: able to perceive the world around them but powerless to look Taround, sniff the air or to cry out. So when the young scientist injected them with a chemical called l-dopa, he witnessed what seemed to be a miracle. They stirred, opened their eyes and began roaming around as if nothing had happened. This may sound familiar from the book Awakenings1 — the true story of how, in 1963, the neurologist Oliver Sacks used l-dopa to spectacularly revive patients with sleeping sickness who had been ‘frozen’, speechless and motionless, for more than 40 years. But the unwritten and equally startling pre- quel took place in Lund, Sweden, several years earlier. The protagonists were rab- Catatonic rabbits were revived by bits; their saviour a young Swedish phar- dopamine in a 1957 experiment led macologist called Arvid Carlsson. by Arvid Carlsson. In his experiment, Carlsson showed that dopamine — the chemical manufac- embrace new techniques and fight tured from levodopa, or l-dopa — acts as for controversial ideas, as Carlsson a neurotransmitter in the brain, passing in Carlsson’s home has done throughout his career, remains essen- signals between neighbouring neurons. town of Gothenburg, Sweden, to cel- tial to success. “He was one of my heroes when Injection of l-dopa restored the propagation ebrate the 50th anniversary of his formative I was a young neurology resident,” says William of electrical signals in the brains of rabbits that paper on the awakened rabbits2. Langston, head of the Parkinson’s Institute in had been rendered catatonic, allowing the ani- During the past half century, Carlsson and Sunnyvale, California. “What impressed me mals to move. But the pharmacological estab- dopamine have followed intertwined paths. was his brilliant deductive reasoning.” lishment was scornful of Carlsson’s claim. At a Researchers now understand that the way Carlsson is a polite, soft-spoken and humor- London meeting in 1960, the foremost experts dopamine works is subtle and complex, and ous gentleman with a hallmark bow tie. He in neural transmission made it clear that they its mechanisms of action are central to the grew up in a family of academics in Lund that didn’t believe him — dopamine was thought to function of many neurological and psychiatric focused on the humanities but, in what he refers be the metabolite of another neurotransmitter drugs. And Carlsson, now a sprightly 84-year- to as a minor act of rebellion, he chose science rather than one in its own right. old, still spends hours pondering the mysteries over the arts because he thought it more useful Within years the critics were silenced. of brain chemistry. But he feels marginalized in to society. He is also single-minded and uncom- Dopamine was shown to be a pivotal chemical Gothenburg and, last year, the institute estab- promising, features that no doubt contributed in the neural circuits that drive pleasure and lished in his name closed prematurely after bit- to his success as a scientist against stiff opposi- addiction, as well as in illnesses such as Parkin- ter feuds about funding. tion — and perhaps also to his later problems. son’s disease, for which l-dopa quickly became The field of biomedicine has also evolved Carlsson calls himself a lucky man, and says a first-line treatment. It remains so today. In during this time, and much has changed. “We his first stroke of luck came when he arrived 2000, Carlsson shared the Nobel Prize in Physi- used slide rules and manual calculators back in the lab of chemist Bernard ‘Steve’ Brodie at ology and Medicine for his discovery. And next then, so statistical calculations were quite time the National Institutes of Health in Bethesda, week neuroscientists will gather at a meeting consuming,” Carlsson says. But a willingness to Maryland, in the summer of 1955. Brodie’s lab 368 NATURE|Vol 447|24 May 2007 NEWS FEATURE pioneered studies with reserpine, one of the But when Carlsson examined dominated the brain itself. “It’s very first drugs to be introduced for the selec- the revived rabbits’ brains hard to imagine now, but when tive treatment of schizophrenia, and hence one after injecting l-dopa he saw I was an undergraduate stu- of the hottest molecules for pharmacologists of a lot of dopamine and very dent at Cambridge [in the late the day. Reserpine injections made rabbits cata- little noradrenaline. At this 1950s] we were taught categori- tonic, but how the drug worked was a mystery. point it dawned on him that cally that there was no chemi- dopamine could be a neuro- cal transmission in the brain Direct measures transmitter in its own right, a — that it was just an electrical At the time, pharmacologists typically tested memory that still summons machine,” recalls pharmacolo- the potency of neurotransmitters with assays astonishment to his face. gist Leslie Iversen, professor of their biological activity — for example, Within months his gradu- emeritus at the University of applying them to a piece of animal gut under ate students Åke Bertler and Oxford, UK. tension in an organ bath to see how much Evald Rosengren had found In this setting, Carlsson’s they could contract or relax the muscle. Bro- that dopamine is normally ideas went down like a stone. die’s team instead developed the spectrophoto- concentrated in areas of the The meeting unceremoniously fluorimeter, a machine able to measure how brain known to be involved “I won the Nobel Prize rejected his interpretation of much neurotransmitter was synthesized from in movement, such as the 40 years after my his data and, to his mortifica- 3 fluorescently tagged precursors. This allowed basal ganglia . Knowing that discovery. Einstein tion, the single comment in the the researchers to measure the precise level of high doses of reserpine cause discussions praising his work a compound extracted from tissue rather than side effects that are similar won one some 20 was excluded from the sympo- an indirect measure of its activity, and later to some of the movement years after his. So I sium book. “The Ciba meeting became a standard instrument in biological difficulties experienced by guess my work was might have been the oppor- labs. When Carlsson returned to Lund after his patients with Parkinson’s dis- tunity to tell the world how five-month visit to Brodie’s lab, the first thing ease, Carlsson proposed that twice as complicated.” things really were, but there he did was order a spectrophotofluorimeter. “I this disease might be caused — Arvid Carlsson was uniform hostility from the didn’t want to be confined by the indirectness by a lack of dopamine. community,” says Iversen. of bioassays,” he says. Carlsson stuck to his guns, Carlsson’s work with this device showed Sparking opposition and data began to amass to a point that made that reserpine completely drains the stores of In late 1958, Carlsson travelled across the denial impossible. Later in 1960, for example, several neurotransmitters in the brain. Loss of Atlantic to explain his ideas to a symposium in the Austrian pharmacologist Oleh Hornykie- one of these was causing the rabbits to become Bethesda. There, his story was well-received. wicz published studies on postmortem brains catatonic — the question was, which one? “But this was not the case when I presented my from patients with Parkinson’s disease, show- Carlsson reasoned that he could answer this results at the Ciba meeting in London,” says ing the absence of dopamine in the basal gan- question by adding back the missing neurotrans- Carlsson, who is still clearly a bit hurt. glia4. And a few years later, Annica Dahlström mitter to rabbits that had been frozen with reser- The prestigious 1960 Ciba Symposium on and Kjell Fuxe at the Karolinska Institute in pine — the crucial awakening experiment. The Adrenergic Mechanism attracted all the key Stockholm, Sweden, showed that in the healthy blood–brain barrier prevents the neurotrans- European players in the field. At the time, a brain neurons in this region contain high levels mitters noradrenaline and serotonin from pass- vigorous debate was going on between the of dopamine5. ing into the brain from the blood, so Carlsson ‘soups’ — who thought that nerve transmission In 1961, neurologist Walter Birkmayer, work- instead injected precursors of these molecules occurred through chemicals — and the ‘sparks’, ing together with Hornykiewicz, injected the that can enter the brain and are then metabolized who argued that it was all electrical. The soups first Parkinson’s patients with l-dopa to dramatic into the relevant neurotransmitter. One of these had more or less won their case for neurotrans- effect, allowing previously immobile patients to precursors was l-dopa, which is converted into mission outside the brain but, owing to lack move freely6. Carlsson recalls the penchant of his dopamine and then, in turn, into noradrenaline. of experimental evidence, the sparks’ view still collaborator Tor Magnusson for testing drugs openly on himself — something that would be Arvid Carlsson regarded with horror today. Expecting to see collects his some kind of neurological effects, Magnusson Nobel prize in hooked himself up to intravenous dopamine, 2000, more but, says Carlsson, “all we saw was emesis!” than 40 years Many other aspects of practising science were after showing different then. Fax and e-mail did not exist, and dopamine to be a all papers were read in the library rather than on neurotransmitter. a computer.
Recommended publications
  • 書 名 等 発行年 出版社 受賞年 備考 N1 Ueber Das Zustandekommen Der
    書 名 等 発行年 出版社 受賞年 備考 Ueber das Zustandekommen der Diphtherie-immunitat und der Tetanus-Immunitat bei thieren / Emil Adolf N1 1890 Georg thieme 1901 von Behring N2 Diphtherie und tetanus immunitaet / Emil Adolf von Behring und Kitasato 19-- [Akitomo Matsuki] 1901 Malarial fever its cause, prevention and treatment containing full details for the use of travellers, University press of N3 1902 1902 sportsmen, soldiers, and residents in malarious places / by Ronald Ross liverpool Ueber die Anwendung von concentrirten chemischen Lichtstrahlen in der Medicin / von Prof. Dr. Niels N4 1899 F.C.W.Vogel 1903 Ryberg Finsen Mit 4 Abbildungen und 2 Tafeln Twenty-five years of objective study of the higher nervous activity (behaviour) of animals / Ivan N5 Petrovitch Pavlov ; translated and edited by W. Horsley Gantt ; with the collaboration of G. Volborth ; and c1928 International Publishing 1904 an introduction by Walter B. Cannon Conditioned reflexes : an investigation of the physiological activity of the cerebral cortex / by Ivan Oxford University N6 1927 1904 Petrovitch Pavlov ; translated and edited by G.V. Anrep Press N7 Die Ätiologie und die Bekämpfung der Tuberkulose / Robert Koch ; eingeleitet von M. Kirchner 1912 J.A.Barth 1905 N8 Neue Darstellung vom histologischen Bau des Centralnervensystems / von Santiago Ramón y Cajal 1893 Veit 1906 Traité des fiévres palustres : avec la description des microbes du paludisme / par Charles Louis Alphonse N9 1884 Octave Doin 1907 Laveran N10 Embryologie des Scorpions / von Ilya Ilyich Mechnikov 1870 Wilhelm Engelmann 1908 Immunität bei Infektionskrankheiten / Ilya Ilyich Mechnikov ; einzig autorisierte übersetzung von Julius N11 1902 Gustav Fischer 1908 Meyer Die experimentelle Chemotherapie der Spirillosen : Syphilis, Rückfallfieber, Hühnerspirillose, Frambösie / N12 1910 J.Springer 1908 von Paul Ehrlich und S.
    [Show full text]
  • Swedish Model of Developing Innovative Drugs: What Happened and Why?
    Acta Scientific Pharmaceutical Sciences (ISSN: 2581-5423) Volume 4 Issue 1 January 2020 Short Communication Swedish Model of Developing Innovative Drugs: What Happened and Why? Jan Olof G Karlsson* Received: December 12, 2019 Division of Drug Research/Pharmacology, Linköping University, Linköping, Published: December 23, 2019 Sweden © All rights are reserved by Jan Olof G *Corresponding Author: Jan Olof G Karlsson, Division of Drug Research/ Karlsson. Pharmacology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. DOI: 10.31080/ASPS.2020.04.0463 - cacious drugs. It has for example been an explosion in our un- American collaborator Sterling Winthrop wanted to add “physi- Still there are large medical needs that are not met with effi it came to the final formulation of Visipaque, Nycomed Imaging’s derstanding of cancer biology but our ability to translate these ological concentration of calcium ions” to it, apparently because it advances into therapies is poor [1]. To developing new drugs is, would sound god when promoting Visipaque. Almén together with a few other scientists realized that such a formulation would put theoretically as well as practically, integrity, creativity, engagement, patients, particularly during coronary angiography, in real danger however, far from an easy task. It demands scientific competence, responsibility and, not at least, critical thinking. - because of increased risk of ventricular fibrillation. The Manage - arguments but not Almén! Later on competitors argue but without cover and develop new drugs that met large medical needs, e.g., ment of Nycomed Imaging was ambivalent for Sterling Winthrop’s Before 1990, the Swedish pharma industry was efficient to dis any proof that Visipaque was more nephrotoxic than its forerun- terbutaline (Bricanyl), felodipin (Plendil), metoprolol (Seloken) ners.
    [Show full text]
  • History-Of-Movement-Disorders.Pdf
    Comp. by: NJayamalathiProof0000876237 Date:20/11/08 Time:10:08:14 Stage:First Proof File Path://spiina1001z/Womat/Production/PRODENV/0000000001/0000011393/0000000016/ 0000876237.3D Proof by: QC by: ProjectAcronym:BS:FINGER Volume:02133 Handbook of Clinical Neurology, Vol. 95 (3rd series) History of Neurology S. Finger, F. Boller, K.L. Tyler, Editors # 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved Chapter 33 The history of movement disorders DOUGLAS J. LANSKA* Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Tomah, WI, USA, and University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA THE BASAL GANGLIA AND DISORDERS Eduard Hitzig (1838–1907) on the cerebral cortex of dogs OF MOVEMENT (Fritsch and Hitzig, 1870/1960), British physiologist Distinction between cortex, white matter, David Ferrier’s (1843–1928) stimulation and ablation and subcortical nuclei experiments on rabbits, cats, dogs and primates begun in 1873 (Ferrier, 1876), and Jackson’s careful clinical The distinction between cortex, white matter, and sub- and clinical-pathologic studies in people (late 1860s cortical nuclei was appreciated by Andreas Vesalius and early 1870s) that the role of the motor cortex was (1514–1564) and Francisco Piccolomini (1520–1604) in appreciated, so that by 1876 Jackson could consider the the 16th century (Vesalius, 1542; Piccolomini, 1630; “motor centers in Hitzig and Ferrier’s region ...higher Goetz et al., 2001a), and a century later British physician in degree of evolution that the corpus striatum” Thomas Willis (1621–1675) implicated the corpus
    [Show full text]
  • ILAE Historical Wall02.Indd 10 6/12/09 12:04:44 PM
    2000–2009 2001 2002 2003 2005 2006 2007 2008 Tim Hunt Robert Horvitz Sir Peter Mansfi eld Barry Marshall Craig Mello Oliver Smithies Luc Montagnier 2000 2000 2001 2002 2004 2005 2007 2008 Arvid Carlsson Eric Kandel Sir Paul Nurse John Sulston Richard Axel Robin Warren Mario Capecchi Harald zur Hauser Nobel Prizes 2000000 2001001 2002002 2003003 200404 2006006 2007007 2008008 Paul Greengard Leland Hartwell Sydney Brenner Paul Lauterbur Linda Buck Andrew Fire Sir Martin Evans Françoise Barré-Sinoussi in Medicine and Physiology 2000 1st Congress of the Latin American Region – in Santiago 2005 ILAE archives moved to Zurich to become publicly available 2000 Zonismide licensed for epilepsy in the US and indexed 2001 Epilepsia changes publishers – to Blackwell 2005 26th International Epilepsy Congress – 2001 Epilepsia introduces on–line submission and reviewing in Paris with 5060 delegates 2001 24th International Epilepsy Congress – in Buenos Aires 2005 Bangladesh, China, Costa Rica, Cyprus, Kazakhstan, Nicaragua, Pakistan, 2001 Launch of phase 2 of the Global Campaign Against Epilepsy Singapore and the United Arab Emirates join the ILAE in Geneva 2005 Epilepsy Atlas published under the auspices of the Global 2001 Albania, Armenia, Arzerbaijan, Estonia, Honduras, Jamaica, Campaign Against Epilepsy Kyrgyzstan, Iraq, Lebanon, Malta, Malaysia, Nepal , Paraguay, Philippines, Qatar, Senegal, Syria, South Korea and Zimbabwe 2006 1st regional vice–president is elected – from the Asian and join the ILAE, making a total of 81 chapters Oceanian Region
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Neuroscience in Autobiography VOLUME 6 This Page Intentionally Left Blank the History of Neuroscience in Autobiography VOLUME 6
    The History of Neuroscience in Autobiography VOLUME 6 This page intentionally left blank The History of Neuroscience in Autobiography VOLUME 6 Edited by Larry R. Squire 1 2009 1 Oxford University Press, Inc., publishes works that further Oxford University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education. Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offi ces in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Copyright © 2009 by Society for Neuroscience Published by Oxford University Press, Inc. 198 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10016 www.oup.com Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of Oxford University Press. Library of Congress Control Number: 96070950 ISBN: 978–0–19–538010–1 1 3 5 7 9 8 6 4 2 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper Contents Previous Contributors vii Preface to Volume 1 ix Preface to Volume 6 xi Bernard W. Agranoff 1 Emilio Bizzi 32 Marian Cleeves Diamond 62 Charles G. Gross 96 Richard Held 158 Leslie L. Iversen 188 Masakazu Konishi 226 Lawrence Kruger 264 Susan E. Leeman 318 Vernon B. Mountcastle 342 Shigetada Nakanishi 382 Solomon H. Snyder 420 Nobuo Suga 480 Hans Thoenen 514 Index of Names This page intentionally left blank Previous Contributors Volume 1 Denise Albe-Fessard Herbert H.
    [Show full text]
  • Nobel Laureates in Physiology Or Medicine
    All Nobel Laureates in Physiology or Medicine 1901 Emil A. von Behring Germany ”for his work on serum therapy, especially its application against diphtheria, by which he has opened a new road in the domain of medical science and thereby placed in the hands of the physician a victorious weapon against illness and deaths” 1902 Sir Ronald Ross Great Britain ”for his work on malaria, by which he has shown how it enters the organism and thereby has laid the foundation for successful research on this disease and methods of combating it” 1903 Niels R. Finsen Denmark ”in recognition of his contribution to the treatment of diseases, especially lupus vulgaris, with concentrated light radiation, whereby he has opened a new avenue for medical science” 1904 Ivan P. Pavlov Russia ”in recognition of his work on the physiology of digestion, through which knowledge on vital aspects of the subject has been transformed and enlarged” 1905 Robert Koch Germany ”for his investigations and discoveries in relation to tuberculosis” 1906 Camillo Golgi Italy "in recognition of their work on the structure of the nervous system" Santiago Ramon y Cajal Spain 1907 Charles L. A. Laveran France "in recognition of his work on the role played by protozoa in causing diseases" 1908 Paul Ehrlich Germany "in recognition of their work on immunity" Elie Metchniko France 1909 Emil Theodor Kocher Switzerland "for his work on the physiology, pathology and surgery of the thyroid gland" 1910 Albrecht Kossel Germany "in recognition of the contributions to our knowledge of cell chemistry made through his work on proteins, including the nucleic substances" 1911 Allvar Gullstrand Sweden "for his work on the dioptrics of the eye" 1912 Alexis Carrel France "in recognition of his work on vascular suture and the transplantation of blood vessels and organs" 1913 Charles R.
    [Show full text]
  • Nobel Laureates Published In
    Nobel Laureates Published in Science has published the research of over 400 Laureates since the award’s inception in 1901! Award categories include Chemistry, Physics, and Medicine. Listed here are prize-winning authors from 1990 to the present, with the number of articles each Laureate published in Science. MEDICINE Articles CHEMISTRY Articles PHYSICS Articles 2015 2016 2014 William C. Campbell . 2 Ben Feringa —Netherlands........................5 Shuji Namakura—Japan .......................... 1 J. Fraser Stoddart—UK . 7 2014 2012 John O’Keefe—US...................................3 2015 Serge Haroche—France . 1 May-Britt Moser—Norway .......................11 Tomas Lindahl—US .................................4 David J. Wineland—US ............................12 Edvard I. Moser—Norway ........................11 Paul Modrich—US...................................4 Aziz Sancar—US.....................................7 2011 2013 Saul Perlmutter—US ............................... 1 2014 James E. Rothman—US ......................... 10 Brian P. Schmidt—US/Australia ................. 1 Eric Betzig—US ......................................9 Randy Schekman—US.............................5 Stefan W. Hell—Germany..........................6 2010 Thomas C. Südhof—Germany ..................13 William E. Moerner—US ...........................5 Andre Geim—Russia/UK..........................6 2012 Konstantin Novoselov—Russia/UK ............5 2013 Sir John B. Gurdon—UK . 1 Martin Karplas—Austria...........................4 2007 Shinya Yamanaka—Japan.........................3
    [Show full text]
  • List of Recent Winners of the Nobel Medicine 2 October 2016
    List of recent winners of the Nobel medicine 2 October 2016 Nobel judges at the Karolinska Institute in and Oliver Smithies Stockholm will announce the Nobel Prize in medicine on Monday on the heels of a scandal — 2006: Andrew Z. Fire and Craig C. Mello over a disgraced stem cell scientist that has rocked the prestigious institution. — 2005: Barry J. Marshall and J. Robin Warren Dr. Paolo Macchiarini, once considered a pioneer — 2004: Richard Axel and Linda B. Buck in windpipe transplants, was fired by Karolinska after being accused of falsifying his resume and — 2003: Paul C. Lauterbur and Sir Peter Mansfield misrepresenting his work. He denies wrongdoing. — 2002: Sydney Brenner, H. Robert Horvitz and Karolinska officials faced scathing criticism for how John E. Sulston they handled the Macchiarini case, and two members of the Nobel Assembly were dismissed — 2001: Leland H. Hartwell, Tim Hunt and Sir Paul amid concerns that the scandal at the institute M. Nurse would taint the Nobel Prize. — 2000: Arvid Carlsson, Paul Greengard and Eric R. The award, the first of this year's Nobel Prizes, will Kandel be announced Monday at 11:30 a.m. (0930 GMT). Here is a list of winners from the past 20 years. — 1999: Gunter Blobel ___ — 1998: Robert F. Furchgott, Louis J. Ignarro and Ferid Murad — 2015: William C. Campbell, Satoshi Omura and Tu Youyou. — 1997: Stanley B. Prusiner — 2014: John O'Keefe, May-Britt Moser and Edvard— 1996: Peter C. Doherty and Rolf M. Zinkernagel Moser. © 2016 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. — 2013: James E. Rothman, Randy W.
    [Show full text]
  • Nobel Laureates Published In
    Nobel Laureates Published in Science has published articles by Nobel Prize® Laureates since the award’s inception! Award categories include Chemistry, Physics, and Medicine. Listed here are prize winning authors from 1990 to the present, with the number of articles each laureate published in Science. Science is considered one of the world’s most prestigious scientific journals and is published by the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). CHEMISTRY MEDICINE Physics 2009 2009 2007 Venkatraman Ramakrishnan—UK ............10 Elizabeth H. Blackburn—US ................................6 Albert Fert—France ...............................................1 Thomas A. Steitz—US ............................................28 Carol W. Greider—US ..................................................1 Ada E. Yonath—Israel ..................................................1 Jack W. Szostak—US ...................................................9 2006 John C. Mather—US ............................................1 2008 2008 Osamu Shimomura—US ........................................7 Françoise Barré-Sinnoussi—Germany ........6 2005 Martin Chalfie—US .......................................................6 Luc Montagnier—France .....................................11 John L. Hall—US .....................................................3 Roger Y. Tsien—US ...................................................14 Harald zur Hausen—France ...................................2 Theodore W. Hänsch—Germany ................2 2007 2007 2004 Gerhard Ertl—Germany
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Annual Report
    BRAIN & BEHAVIOR RESEARCH FOUNDATION 2019 ANNUAL REPORT Awarding research grants to develop improved treatments, cures, and methods of prevention for mental illness. BBRF is the world’s largest private funder of mental health research grants, supporting transformative discoveries in order to develop improved treatments, cures, and methods of prevention for our loved ones. CONTENTS Mission 4 BBRF Events 28 Leadership Letter 6 The Research Partners Program 42 Important Advancements 8 Team Up for Research 50 BBRF Scientific Council 12 2019 Donor Listing 52 2019 Leading Research Achievements 14 Getting the Word Out 76 BBRF Grants 18 Financial Summary 78 2019 Grants by Illness 20 The Research We Fund We invest in innovative research because we believe that only by pursuing the boldest and most ambitious ideas will we find better treatments, cures, and methods of prevention for mental illness. We are at the Forefront of Critical Discoveries Since 1987, the Brain & Behavior Research Foundation has awarded more than $408 million in grants that have led to discoveries that change the way we think about recovery. BBRF-funded research has contributed to: • FDA approval of the first rapid-acting antidepressants (esketamine and brexanalone) to alleviate severe depression symptoms within hours. • Dietary supplements for pregnant women to potentially help prevent subsequent mental illness in the child. • Development of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) and continued improvement of TMS and other non-invasive brain stimulation treatments for treatment-resistant depression and obsessive compulsive disorder. • Computer-guided training for cognitive remediation in people with schizophrenia. MISSION The Brain & Behavior Research Foundation is committed to alleviating the suffering caused by mental illness by awarding grants that will lead to advances and breakthroughs in scientific research.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Nobel Laureates 1
    List of Nobel laureates 1 List of Nobel laureates The Nobel Prizes (Swedish: Nobelpriset, Norwegian: Nobelprisen) are awarded annually by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, the Swedish Academy, the Karolinska Institute, and the Norwegian Nobel Committee to individuals and organizations who make outstanding contributions in the fields of chemistry, physics, literature, peace, and physiology or medicine.[1] They were established by the 1895 will of Alfred Nobel, which dictates that the awards should be administered by the Nobel Foundation. Another prize, the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences, was established in 1968 by the Sveriges Riksbank, the central bank of Sweden, for contributors to the field of economics.[2] Each prize is awarded by a separate committee; the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences awards the Prizes in Physics, Chemistry, and Economics, the Karolinska Institute awards the Prize in Physiology or Medicine, and the Norwegian Nobel Committee awards the Prize in Peace.[3] Each recipient receives a medal, a diploma and a monetary award that has varied throughout the years.[2] In 1901, the recipients of the first Nobel Prizes were given 150,782 SEK, which is equal to 7,731,004 SEK in December 2007. In 2008, the winners were awarded a prize amount of 10,000,000 SEK.[4] The awards are presented in Stockholm in an annual ceremony on December 10, the anniversary of Nobel's death.[5] As of 2011, 826 individuals and 20 organizations have been awarded a Nobel Prize, including 69 winners of the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences.[6] Four Nobel laureates were not permitted by their governments to accept the Nobel Prize.
    [Show full text]
  • 24 August 2013 Seminar Held
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NOBEL PRIZE SEMINAR 2012 (NPS 2012) 0 Organized by School of Chemistry Editor: Dr. Nabakrushna Behera Lecturer, School of Chemistry, S.U. (E-mail: [email protected]) 24 August 2013 Seminar Held Sambalpur University Jyoti Vihar-768 019 Odisha Organizing Secretary: Dr. N. K. Behera, School of Chemistry, S.U., Jyoti Vihar, 768 019, Odisha. Dr. S. C. Jamir Governor, Odisha Raj Bhawan Bhubaneswar-751 008 August 13, 2013 EMSSSEM I am glad to know that the School of Chemistry, Sambalpur University, like previous years is organizing a Seminar on "Nobel Prize" on August 24, 2013. The Nobel Prize instituted on the lines of its mentor and founder Alfred Nobel's last will to establish a series of prizes for those who confer the “greatest benefit on mankind’ is widely regarded as the most coveted international award given in recognition to excellent work done in the fields of Physics, Chemistry, Physiology or Medicine, Literature, and Peace. The Prize since its introduction in 1901 has a very impressive list of winners and each of them has their own story of success. It is heartening that a seminar is being organized annually focusing on the Nobel Prize winning work of the Nobel laureates of that particular year. The initiative is indeed laudable as it will help teachers as well as students a lot in knowing more about the works of illustrious recipients and drawing inspiration to excel and work for the betterment of mankind. I am sure the proceeding to be brought out on the occasion will be highly enlightening.
    [Show full text]