DOCSLIB.ORG

Ecopath with Ecosim: a User's Guide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ecopath with Ecosim: a User's Guide ECOPATH WITH ECOSIM: A USER’S GUIDE by Villy Christensen, Carl J. Walters and Daniel Pauly October 2000 Edition Fisheries Centre University of British Columbia Vancouver, Canada and International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Management Penang, Malaysia No fish is an island… Christensen, V, C.J. Walters and D. Pauly. 2000. Ecopath with Ecosim: a User’s Guide, October 2000 Edition. Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada and ICLARM, Penang, Malaysia. 130 p. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. ABSTRACT...................................................................................................................................... 7 2. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 7 2.1 General conventions........................................................................................................................................8 2.2 How to obtain the Ecopath with Ecosim software...........................................................................................9 2.3 Software support, copyright and liability ........................................................................................................9 2.4 Installing and running Ecopath with Ecosim...................................................................................................9 2.5 Previous versions ............................................................................................................................................9 3. ECOPATH: MASS BALANCE MODELING ................................................................................... 10 3.1 About Ecopath...............................................................................................................................................10 3.2 On modeling..................................................................................................................................................10 3.3 The Ecopath model .......................................................................................................................................12 3.3.1 Mortality for a prey is consumption for a predator........................................................................................12 3.3.2 The energy balance of a box .........................................................................................................................15 3.4 Defining the system.......................................................................................................................................16 4. USING ECOPATH ......................................................................................................................... 17 4.1 Getting help...................................................................................................................................................17 4.2 File handling..................................................................................................................................................17 4.3 Edit menu ......................................................................................................................................................19 4.4 Units..............................................................................................................................................................20 4.5 Group information.........................................................................................................................................20 4.6 Other group manipulations (Edit menu)........................................................................................................22 4.6.1 Insert groups..................................................................................................................................................22 4.6.2 Delete groups ................................................................................................................................................22 4.7 Basic input.....................................................................................................................................................22 4.7.1 On the need for input parameters ..................................................................................................................23 4.7.2 Basic input menu...........................................................................................................................................23 4.7.3 Production.....................................................................................................................................................25 4.7.3.1 Total mortality catch curves..........................................................................................................................26 4.7.3.2 Total mortality from sum of components ......................................................................................................26 4.7.3.3 Total mortality from average length..............................................................................................................26 4.7.3.4 Production from empirical relationships .......................................................................................................26 4.7.4 Consumption .................................................................................................................................................27 4.7.5 Other mortality..............................................................................................................................................28 4.7.6 Alternative input............................................................................................................................................28 4.7.7 Diet composition ...........................................................................................................................................29 4.7.8 Detritus fate...................................................................................................................................................30 4.7.9 Migration.......................................................................................................................................................30 4.7.10 Representing movement of organisms across modeled area boundaries due to migration and ontogenetic habitat shifts ..................................................................................................................................................31 4.7.11 Fishery information and non-market value....................................................................................................32 4.7.12 Growth ..........................................................................................................................................................35 5. ADDRESSING UNCERTAINTY .................................................................................................... 36 5.1 Ecoranger ......................................................................................................................................................36 5.1.1 Labeling probability distributions for Ecoranger ..........................................................................................37 5.1.2 Sampling/Importance resampling..................................................................................................................38 5.2 Pedigree: categorizing data sources ..............................................................................................................39 5.3 Sensitivity......................................................................................................................................................43 6. PARAMETER ESTIMATION, EVALUATION, AND BASIC ANALYSIS......................................... 43 6.1 The estimation procedure..............................................................................................................................44 6.2 Parameter evaluation.....................................................................................................................................44 3 6.2.1 Are the EE’s between 0 and 1? .....................................................................................................................44 6.2.2 Ecotrophic efficiency of detritus ...................................................................................................................45 6.2.3 Are the ‘efficiencies’ possible? .....................................................................................................................45 6.3 Balancing a model.........................................................................................................................................45 6.4 Basic analysis................................................................................................................................................47 6.4.1 Flow to the detritus........................................................................................................................................47 6.4.2 Amounts exported or eaten............................................................................................................................48 6.4.3 Net efficiency................................................................................................................................................48
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Experimental Study of the Zooplankton Impact on the Trophic Structure of Phytoplankton and the Microbial Assemblages in a Temper
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Limnologica 37 (2007) 88–99 www.elsevier.de/limno Experimental study of the zooplankton impact on the trophic structure of phytoplankton and the microbial assemblages in a temperate wetland (Argentina) Rodrigo Sinistroa,Ã, Marı´ a Laura Sa´ ncheza, Marı´ a Cristina Marinoneb, Irina Izaguirrea,c aDepartamento de Ecologı´a, Gene´tica y Evolucio´n, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, C1428EHA Buenos Aires, Argentina bDepartamento de Biodiversidad y Biologı´a Experimental, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, C1428EHA Buenos Aires, Argentina cConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientı´ficas y Te´cnicas (CONICET), Argentina Received 7 July 2006; received in revised form 23 August 2006; accepted 1 September 2006 Abstract An experimental study using mesocosms was conducted in the main shallow lake of a temperate wetland (Otamendi Natural Reserve, Argentina) to analyse the impact of zooplankton on phytoplankton and the microbial assemblages. The lake is characterised by the presence of a fluctuating cover of floating macrophytes, whose shading effects shape the phytoplakton community and the ecosystem functioning, which was absent during the study period. The experiment was run in situ using polyethylene bags, comparing treatments with and without zooplankton. The cascade effect of zooplankton on phytoplankton and the lower levels of the microbial food web (ciliates, heterotrophic nanoflagellates (HNF) and picoplankton) were analysed. A significant zooplankton grazing on the nano-phytoplankton fraction (3–30 mm) was observed. Conversely, large algae (filamentous cyanobacteria, colonial chlorophytes and large diatoms) increased in all mesocosms until day 10, suggesting that they were not actively grazed by zooplankton during this period.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecoevoapps: Interactive Apps for Teaching Theoretical Models In
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.18.449026; this version posted June 19, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 1 Last rendered: 18 Jun 2021 2 Running head: EcoEvoApps 3 EcoEvoApps: Interactive Apps for Teaching Theoretical 4 Models in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology 5 Preprint for bioRxiv 6 Keywords: active learning, pedagogy, mathematical modeling, R package, shiny apps 7 Word count: 4959 words in the Main Body; 148 words in the Abstract 8 Supplementary materials: Supplemental PDF with 7 components (S1-S7) 1∗ 1∗ 2∗ 1 9 Authors: Rosa M. McGuire , Kenji T. Hayashi , Xinyi Yan , Madeline C. Cowen , Marcel C. 1 3 3,4 10 Vaz , Lauren L. Sullivan , Gaurav S. Kandlikar 1 11 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles 2 12 Department of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin 3 13 Division of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia 4 14 Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia ∗ 15 These authors contributed equally to the writing of the manuscript, and author order was 16 decided with a random number generator. 17 Authors for correspondence: 18 Rosa M. McGuire: [email protected] 19 Kenji T. Hayashi: [email protected] 20 Xinyi Yan: [email protected] 21 Gaurav S. Kandlikar: [email protected] 22 Coauthor contact information: 23 Madeline C. Cowen: [email protected] 24 Marcel C.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change: the Cascade Effect Final Appendices
    Appendices Appendix 1. Issues raised at workshops Hamilton workshop Three Waters (including river protection structures) • Increased risk of flooding will have knock-on implications for all different services. Economic viability within the catchment. Insurance (or not). Knock-on effect for people who live within the region. Public health risks associated with dampness. Schools impacted by this and the implications for mental health. Property values. Depress the economy. • We may have gone past some of the thresholds for viable land use in some regions. Rates increases becoming untenable for both councils and farmers. As soon as we say we will no longer top up the stopbanks that will be the loss of that community (and a loss for many people). Unless we have a parallel way to get out. Will be legal challenges and huge ramifications. Some of the community do not believe in climate change. • Perceptions of safety by citizens due to having stopbanks. Loss of storytelling. Need to pay if they want to go from a 50yr to a 100 yr scheme. Gold-plated scheme $$$. If locals can't pay, the wider community or central government pay. Cost to others. Debt caps exist however. • Loss of stopbank could knock out key roading infrastructure. In particular SH25. Would have to change to SH2. • Loss of stopbank impacts local communities (i.e., housing). • Loss of stopbanks impacts on agriculture and farming communities. • Bigger pipes could lead to benefits for fish passage, etc. • Need to ensure wastewater is dealt with to protect water supply. • Important to maintaining commercial viability. • Financial implications if wastewater is knocked out.
    [Show full text]
  • Fisheries Managementmanagement
    ISSN 1020-5292 FAO TECHNICAL GUIDELINES FOR RESPONSIBLE FISHERIES 4 Suppl. 2 Add.1 FISHERIESFISHERIES MANAGEMENTMANAGEMENT These guidelines were produced as an addition to the FAO Technical Guidelines for 2. The ecosystem approach to fisheries Responsible Fisheries No. 4, Suppl. 2 entitled Fisheries management. The ecosystem approach to fisheries (EAF). Applying EAF in management requires the application of 2.1 Best practices in ecosystem modelling scientific methods and tools that go beyond the single-species approaches that have been the main sources of scientific advice. These guidelines have been developed to forfor informinginforming anan ecosystemecosystem approachapproach toto fisheriesfisheries assist users in the construction and application of ecosystem models for informing an EAF. It addresses all steps of the modelling process, encompassing scoping and specifying the model, implementation, evaluation and advice on how to present and use the outputs. The overall goal of the guidelines is to assist in ensuring that the best possible information and advice is generated from ecosystem models and used wisely in management. ISBN 978-92-5-105995-1 ISSN 1020-5292 9 7 8 9 2 5 1 0 5 9 9 5 1 TC/M/I0151E/1/05.08/1630 Cover illustration: Designed by Elda Longo. FAO TECHNICAL GUIDELINES FOR RESPONSIBLE FISHERIES 4 Suppl. 2 Add 1 FISHERIES MANAGEMENT 2.2. TheThe ecosystemecosystem approachapproach toto fisheriesfisheries 2.12.1 BestBest practicespractices inin ecosystemecosystem modellingmodelling forfor informinginforming anan ecosystemecosystem approachapproach toto fisheriesfisheries FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2008 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Life History Strategies, Population Regulation, and Implications for Fisheries Management1
    872 PERSPECTIVE / PERSPECTIVE Life history strategies, population regulation, and implications for fisheries management1 Kirk O. Winemiller Abstract: Life history theories attempt to explain the evolution of organism traits as adaptations to environmental vari- ation. A model involving three primary life history strategies (endpoints on a triangular surface) describes general pat- terns of variation more comprehensively than schemes that examine single traits or merely contrast fast versus slow life histories. It provides a general means to predict a priori the types of populations with high or low demographic resil- ience, production potential, and conformity to density-dependent regulation. Periodic (long-lived, high fecundity, high recruitment variation) and opportunistic (small, short-lived, high reproductive effort, high demographic resilience) strat- egies should conform poorly to models that assume density-dependent recruitment. Periodic-type species reveal greatest recruitment variation and compensatory reserve, but with poor conformity to stock–recruitment models. Equilibrium- type populations (low fecundity, large egg size, parental care) should conform better to assumptions of density- dependent recruitment, but have lower demographic resilience. The model’s predictions are explored relative to sustain- able harvest, endangered species conservation, supplemental stocking, and transferability of ecological indices. When detailed information is lacking, species ordination according to the triangular model provides qualitative
    [Show full text]
  • CHARACTERIZATION, EPIGENETIC DRUG EFFECT, and GENE DELIVERY to BREAST CANCER CELLS a Dissertation Presented to the Graduate Facu
    CHARACTERIZATION, EPIGENETIC DRUG EFFECT, AND GENE DELIVERY TO BREAST CANCER CELLS A Dissertation Presented to The Graduate Faculty of The University of Akron In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Shan Lu December, 2015 CHARACTERIZATION, EPIGENETIC DRUG EFFECT, AND GENE DELIVERY TO BREAST CANCER CELLS Shan Lu Dissertation Approved: Accepted: Advisor Department Chair Dr. Vinod Labhasetwar Dr. Stephen Weeks Committee Chair Dean of the College Dr. Coleen Pugh Dr. John Green Committee Member Dean of Graduate School Dr. Abraham Joy Dr. Chand Midha Committee Member Dr. Ali Dhinojwala Committee Member Dr. Anand Ramamurthi Committee Member Dr. Peter Niewiarowski ii ABSTRACT Cancer relapse is strongly associated with the presence of cancer stem cells (CSCs), which drive the development of metastasis and drug resistance. In human breast cancer, CSCs are identified by the CD44+/CD24- phenotype and characterized by drug resistance, high tumorigenicity and metastatic potential. In this study, I found that MCF-7/Adr cells that are breast cancer cells resistant to doxorubicin (Dox) uniformly displayed CSC surface markers, possessed CSC proteins, formed in vitro mammospheres, yet retained low migratory rate. They were also able to self-renew and differentiate under floating culture condition and are responsive to epigenetic drug treatment. High degree of DNA methylation (modifications of the cytosine residues of DNA) and histone deacetylation are major epigenetic landmarks of CSCs. In this work, I showed that MCF-7/Adr cells are sensitive to histone deacetylation inhibitor suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA). Through RNA-sequencing technology, I also found that decitabine (DAC) and SAHA similarly affected a large number of the examined pathways, including drug and nanoparticle cellular uptake and transport, lipid metabolism, carcinogenesis and nuclear transport pathways.
    [Show full text]
  • Optimal Control of a Fishery Utilizing Compensation and Critical Depensation Models
    Appl. Math. Inf. Sci. 14, No. 3, 467-479 (2020) 467 Applied Mathematics & Information Sciences An International Journal http://dx.doi.org/10.18576/amis/140314 Optimal Control of a Fishery Utilizing Compensation and Critical Depensation Models Mahmud Ibrahim Department of Mathematics, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana Received: 12 Dec. 2019, Revised: 2 Jan. 2020, Accepted: 15 Feb. 2020 Published online: 1 May 2020 Abstract: This study proposes optimal control problems with two different biological dynamics: a compensation model and a critical depensation model. The static equilibrium reference points of the models are defined and discussed. Also, bifurcation analyses on the models show the existence of transcritical and saddle-node bifurcations for the compensation and critical depensation models respectively. Pontyagin’s maximum principle is employed to determine the necessary conditions of the model. In addition, sufficiency conditions that guarantee the existence and uniqueness of the optimality system are defined. The characterization of the optimal control gives rise to both the boundary and interior solutions, with the former indicating that the resource should be harvested if and only if the value of the net revenue per unit harvest (due to the application of up to the maximum fishing effort) is at least the value of the shadow price of fish stock. Numerical simulations with empirical data on the sardinella are carried out to validate the theoretical results. Keywords: Optimal control, Compensation, Critical depensation, Bifurcation, Shadow price, Ghana sardinella fishery 1 Introduction harvesting of either species. The study showed that, with harvesting effort serving as a control, the system could be steered towards a desirable state, and so breaking its Fish stocks across the world are increasingly under cyclic behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplement A: Assumptions and Equations in Ecopath with Ecosim Governing Equations
    Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 145:136–162, 2016 © American Fisheries Society 2016 DOI: 10.1080/00028487.2015.1069211 Supplement A: Assumptions and Equations in Ecopath with Ecosim Governing Equations The Ecopath module of EwE is a static, mass-balance ecosystem model that uses two governing equations for each species and age group (Christensen and Walters 2004). The first governing equation describes each species group’s production for a time period, i.e., production (P) is the sum of fishery catch (F), predation (M2), net migration (immigration, I, and emigration, E), biomass accumulation (BA), and mortality from other sources (‘other mortality’, M0): P = F + M2 + (I - E) + BA - M0 The second governing equation is based on the principle of conservation of matter within a group, and is designed to balance the energy flows of a biomass pool, i.e., consumption (C) equals the sum of production (P), respiration (R), and unassimilated food (U): C = P + R + U At a minimum, Ecopath requires inputs of diet composition (DCi,j, where i is predator and j is prey), fishery catch (Yi), and three of the following four parameters for each model group (i): biomass (Bi), production-to-biomass ratio (Pi/Bi), consumption-to-biomass ratio (Qi/Bi), and the ecotrophic efficiency (EEi, the fraction of the production that is used in the system and does not move directly to the detritus pool). Mass-balance principles are then used to estimate the fourth parameter. P/B is the annual production rate of the population in Ecopath. Under equilibrium conditions, the P/B ratio of fish is equivalent to its total annual instantaneous mortality (Z) (Allen 1971).
    [Show full text]
  • What Happened When Wolves Were Reintroduced to Yellowstone Park?
    Trophic Cascades: What Happened When Wolves Were Reintroduced to Yellowstone Park? Lesson Question How did the reintroduction of wolves into Yellowstone Park affect the other animals and plants in the ecosystem? Lesson Tasks Students analyze data to determine the effect of wolves on Yellowstone’s elk population, on the plants that elk graze on, and on the animals that compete with elk for food. They write a report describing how the reintroduction of wolves has created a trophic cascade—not just a few direct changes in one food chain, but a series of indirect changes throughout the food web. Standards • HS-LS2-2 Ecosystems: Interactions, Energy, and Dynamics NGSS Science and Engineering Practices • Constructing Explanations and Designing Solutions • Engaging in Argument from Evidence • Evaluate the claims, evidence, and reasoning behind currently accepted explanations or solutions to determine the merits of arguments. NGSS Disciplinary Core Ideas • LS2.C: Ecosystem Dynamics, Functioning and Resilience • ETS1.B: Developing Possible Solutions Crosscutting Concepts • Stability and Change, Patterns Connections to Nature of Science • Scientific Knowledge is open to revision in light of new evidence. • Most scientific Knowledge is quite durable, but is, in principle, subject to change based on new evidence and/or reinterpretation of existing evidence. Trophic Cascades: What Happened When Wolves Were Reintroduced to Yellowstone Park? TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW ........................................................... 3 INVESTIGATION ...............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Cascades Emanating from Earthworm Invasions
    502 REVIEWS Side- swiped: ecological cascades emanating from earthworm invasions Lee E Frelich1*, Bernd Blossey2, Erin K Cameron3,4, Andrea Dávalos2,5, Nico Eisenhauer6,7, Timothy Fahey2, Olga Ferlian6,7, Peter M Groffman8,9, Evan Larson10, Scott R Loss11, John C Maerz12, Victoria Nuzzo13, Kyungsoo Yoo14, and Peter B Reich1,15 Non- native, invasive earthworms are altering soils throughout the world. Ecological cascades emanating from these invasions stem from rapid consumption of leaf litter by earthworms. This occurs at a midpoint in the trophic pyramid, unlike the more familiar bottom- up or top- down cascades. These cascades cause fundamental changes (“microcascade effects”) in soil morphol- ogy, bulk density, and nutrient leaching, and a shift to warmer, drier soil surfaces with a loss of leaf litter. In North American temperate and boreal forests, microcascade effects can affect carbon sequestration, disturbance regimes, soil and water quality, forest productivity, plant communities, and wildlife habitat, and can facilitate other invasive species. These broader- scale changes (“macrocascade effects”) are of greater concern to society. Interactions among these fundamental changes and broader-scale effects create “cascade complexes” that interact with climate change and other environmental processes. The diversity of cascade effects, combined with the vast area invaded by earthworms, leads to regionally important changes in ecological functioning. Front Ecol Environ 2019; 17(9): 502–510, doi:10.1002/fee.2099 lthough society usually
    [Show full text]
  • Depensation: Evidence, Models and Implications
    Paper 29 Disc FISH and FISHERIES, 2001, 2, 33±58 Depensation: evidence, models and implications Martin Liermann1 & Ray Hilborn2 1Quantitative Ecology and Resource Management, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98115, USA; 2School of Fisheries Box 355020, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA Abstract Correspondence: We review the evidence supporting depensation, describe models of two depensatory Martin Liermann, National Marine mechanisms and how they can be included in population dynamics models and Fisheries Service, discuss the implications of depensation. The evidence for depensation can be grouped North-west Fisheries into four mechanisms: reduced probability of fertilisation, impaired group dynamics, Science Center, 2725 Ahed conditioning of the environment and predator saturation. Examples of these Montlake Blvd. E., Bhed mechanisms come from a broad range of species including fishes, arthropods, birds, Seattle, WA 98112± Ched 2013, USA mammals and plants. Despite the large number of studies supporting depensatory Dhed Tel: +206 860 6781 mechanisms, there is very little evidence of depensation that is strong enough to be Fax: +206 860 3335 Ref marker important in a population's dynamics. However, because factors such as E-mail: martin. Fig marker demographic and environmental variability make depensatory population dynamics [email protected] Table marker difficult to detect, this lack of evidence should not be interpreted as evidence that Ref end depensatory dynamics are rare and unimportant. The majority of depensatory models Ref start Received 22 Sep 2000 are based on reduced probability of fertilisation and predator saturation. We review Accepted 29Nov 2000 the models of these mechanisms and different ways they can be incorporated in population dynamics models.
    [Show full text]
  • New York Ocean Action Plan 2016 – 2026
    NEW YORK OCEAN ACTION PLAN 2016 – 2026 In collaboration with state and federal agencies, municipalities, tribal partners, academic institutions, non- profits, and ocean-based industry and tourism groups. Acknowledgments The preparation of the content within this document was developed by Debra Abercrombie and Karen Chytalo from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and in cooperation and coordination with staff from the New York State Department of State. Funding was provided by the New York State Environmental Protection Fund’s Ocean & Great Lakes Program. Other New York state agencies, federal agencies, estuary programs, the New York Ocean and Great Lakes Coalition, the Shinnecock Indian Nation and ocean-based industry and user groups provided numerous revisions to draft versions of this document which were invaluable. The New York Marine Sciences Consortium provided vital recommendations concerning data and research needs, as well as detailed revisions to earlier drafts. Thank you to all of the members of the public and who participated in the stakeholder focal groups and for also providing comments and revisions. For more information, please contact: Karen Chytalo New York State Department of Environmental Conservation [email protected] 631-444-0430 Cover Page Photo credits, Top row: E. Burke, SBU SoMAS, M. Gove; Bottom row: Wolcott Henry- 2005/Marine Photo Bank, Eleanor Partridge/Marine Photo Bank, Brandon Puckett/Marine Photo Bank. NEW YORK OCEAN ACTION PLAN | 2016 – 2026 i MESSAGE FROM COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY The ocean and its significant resources have been at the heart of New York’s richness and economic vitality, since our founding in the 17th Century and continues today.
    [Show full text]