DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annual Report Beginnings and Crowning Achievements BOONE AND CROCKETT CLUB FISCAL YEAR 2014 Annual Report A band of bighorns on the Cadomin Mine, Alberta, Canada Photograph courtesy of L. Victor Clark, B&C Official Measurer1 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Founded In 1887 By Theodore Roosevelt Boone and Crockett Club Boone and Crockett Club President – William A. Demmer Foundation Secretary – Tom L. Lewis President – B.B. Hollingsworth, Jr. Treasurer – Marshall J. Collins, Jr. Secretary – Tom L. Lewis Executive Vice President of Administration – Treasurer – C. Martin Wood III Timothy C. Brady Vice President – James J. Shinners Executive Vice President of Conservation – Vice President – John A. Tomke Morrison Stevens, Sr. Class of 2014 – Remo R. Pizzagalli, Vice President of Administration – Edward B. Rasmuson, James J. Shinners, James F. Arnold John A. Tomke, and Leonard J. Vallender Vice President of Big Game Records – Class of 2015 – Gary W. Dietrich, Eldon L. “Buck” Buckner B.B. Hollingsworth, Jr., Ned S. Holmes, Vice President of Conservation – Tom L. Lewis, and Paul M. Zelisko Stephen P. Mealey Class of 2016 – John P. Evans, Steve J. Hageman, Vice President of Communications – R. Terrell McCombs, Earl L. Sherron, Jr., Marc C. Mondavi C. Martin Woods Foundation President – B.B. Hollingsworth, Jr. Class of 2014 – James Cummins Class of 2015 – CJ Buck Class of 2016 – Ned S. Holmes COMMITTEES SPECIAL COMMITTEES CONSERVATION COMMITTEES Audit – Edward B. Rasmuson VP STEPHEN P. MEALEY AWCP – Jeffrey S. Crane Conservation – James L. Cummins Compensation – William A. Demmer Conservation Education – William W. Taylor Corporate Governance – Ben B. Wallace Conservation Grants – Deborah Donner and Conservation Policy – Stephen P. Mealey and Robert Evelyn H. Merrill Model Multiple Use/Sharing – Melissa Simpson and Convention and Meeting – Manuel J. Chee M. Timothy Wigley Membership – Andrew L. Hoxsey National Conservation Leadership Institute – Nominating – Ben B. Wallace John A. Tomke Sagamore Hill – Ben B. Wallace North American Model/Conservation Funding – Simon C. Roosevelt ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEES Stewardship – Thomas D. Price VP JAMES F. ARNOLD TRM Ranch – Fred C. Hirschy Budget and Finance – Marshall J. Collins, Jr. Wildlife Health – Rebecca A. Humphries History – Leonard H. Wurman Library – H. Norden van Horne RECORDS COMMITTEES Physical Assets – Earl L. Sherron, Jr. VP ELDON L. “BUCK” BUCKNER Strategic Planning – James L. Cummins Records of North American Big Game – Richard T. Hale COMMUNICATIONS COMMITTEES Hunter Ethics – Daniel A. Pedrotti, Jr. VP MARC C. MONDAVI Communications – CJ Buck Associates Program – John P. Schreiner Boone and Crockett Club Media Response – Mary Webster Foundation committees Outreach – Anthony J. Caligiuri Development – James J. Shinners Content Management – AC Smid Investment – Paul Zelisko Publications – Mark B. Steffen Gift Acceptance – B.B. Hollingsworth, Jr. National Collection – Robert H. Hanson 2 MISSION STATEMENT It is the mission of the Boone and Crockett Club to promote the conservation and management of wildlife, especially big game, and its habitat, to preserve and encourage hunting and to maintain the highest ethical standards of fair chase and sportsmanship in North America. 3 MESSAGE FROM THE BOONE AND CROCKETT CLUB PRESIDENT he Boone and Crockett Club finishes of Wildlife Mississippi, will evolve into a leader- Tits 127th year filled with energy and ship position of the Club’s Conservation Policy enthusiasm for its continuing mission to Committee over the next several years. Cummins promote the conservation and manage- and fellow B&C member Steve Mealey agreed to ment of wildlife and to encourage ethical assemble and regularly publish a conservation policy newsletter to feature our policy successes fair chase hunting. B&C’s strategic and and enlighten B&C supporters on key issues re- operational plans have been designed to garding our conservation mission. The newslet- meet the challenges of an evolving world. ter is also intended as another deliverable to our Our successes with conservation policy ef- Trailblazers in Conservation sponsors illustrating William A. Demmer forts, quality membership attraction, B&C how B&C is working on their behalf. B&C President University Programs, our financial future, Andrew Hoxsey and his Membership Com- Lansing, Michigan our Foundation’s successes and our Club mittee have kept the pipeline of potential mem- messaging efforts clearly demonstrate that bership candidates full. Hoxsey and his team are our planning efforts are on track and bear- to be commended for attracting such high-caliber ing fruit. new members and pipeline candidates. An en- gaged membership is the secret to success of any Our Conservation Policy team, led by Rob- organization, and the Boone and Crockett Club is ert Model, hosted a meeting for all interested no exception. The future of B&C relies on mem- B&C members and leadership at Model’s Moon- bers who give of their passion, their time and trea- crest Ranch in Cody, Wyoming, this past May. sure to protect and enhance this thing that we call The focus of the meeting was twofold; one was hunter-conservation. to communicate to the membership the accom- A year ago in June, the Club leadership met plishments of the policy team in an open dialog in Branson, Missouri, at member John L. Morris’ that would create a greater understanding of the Big Cedar Lodge. The focus of the leadership was work of the committee and to inspire greater fu- B&C branding, committee metrics and staff met- ture participation in policy work by our members. rics as they relate to committee output. The met- The meeting also began to lay the plans for Policy rics that were created were both quantitative and Committee leadership succession and for gradual qualitative. The metrics tied directly to B&C’s Club assumption of the costs associated with our implementation plan. B&C had been challenged policy activities. financially since the recession onset in 2008. Strategically, Boone and Crockett Club Costs had been pared to balance budgets but it conservation policy efforts were the number one was then time to begin to create additional rev- focus of our recent strategic and implementation enues to support our refined mission. B&C oper- plans. Greg Schildwachter facilitated the meeting ating committees took up the challenges to meet and explained to the attendees that the circle of their metric expectations and generated two years influence associated with conservation policy in of financial operating success. I am confident in Washington, D.C., is quite small. Schildwachter the follow-on leadership that more financial suc- told us that our Club’s team—led by Model—in- cess will follow. As our branding effort continues cludes Schildwachter, as well as David Anderson’s to grow and more hunter-conservationists join Natural Resources Results, the Congressional our cause either through becoming associates, Sportsmen’s Foundation, and the Wildlife Man- advertisers, Trailblazers, brand licensees or B&C agement Institute is as influential as any conser- Foundation supporter, the Club’s financial abil- vation policy consortium in D.C. B&C member ity to impact our mission will grow dramatically. James Cummins, currently the executive director With that growing financial power, it will be the 4 responsibility of future management teams to use 2013. They are already planning for the 29th tri- that money wisely and keep it focused on where it ennial celebration to be held in 2016 in Spring- can best impact our historical mission. field, Missouri. The Records Division held a The strategic and implementation plans on five-day course for new Official Measurers. My which B&C members James Cummins and Jayar wife Linda and I attended with a group of 15 Daily worked so hard continue to positively im- other students and were well challenged by the pact our mission work. The many interviews Dean of North American Measurers, Director afforded the membership resulted in plan pri- Jack Reneau and his most able partner, Assistant orities focused on conservation policy, university Director Justin Spring. All attendees not only endowed professors and programs, conservation walked away as new Official Boone and Crock- grants that impact the B&C mission, big game re- ett Measurers, but we received a dynamic educa- cords, promotion of the North American Model tion in the history of North American wildlife of Wildlife Conservation and the promotion of conservation and the predominant role that the the B&C brand. The success of the B&C Founda- Boone and Crockett Club has played in creating tion team, led by Ben Hollingsworth, will afford and securing its future. the Club future financial resources that can make B&C’s University Programs continue to be a powerful impact on our mission. It will be the a priority within our strategic initiatives. B&C responsibility of B&C’s leadership and board of currently has endowed programs at University of directors to prioritize our activities and focus on Montana, Oregon State University, Texas A&M, those efforts that are core to our mission. Texas A&M Kingsville, Michigan State Univer- B&C’s Communications Division is at the sity and the University of Wisconsin–Stevens heart of much of what the Club is about. The Point. New programs are in development at the branding efforts that were presented and discussed State University of New York (SUNY) and at at the Branson retreat are at the heart of the new Mississippi State University. Michigan State re- evolving B&C website. Promoting our historic role cently expanded its program to include the Boone in hunter-conservation and inspiring community and Crockett Quantitative Wildlife Center. The engagement is at the heart of those efforts. B&C’s Boone and Crockett Endowed University Pro- Associates Program continues to grow as does the grams were designed to develop and inspire a respect for and impact of our heralded magazine, cadre of wildlife professionals for our future. The . Recent readership surveys indicate very intent was to create professionals with a powerful favorableFair Chase reviews of the magazine’s balanced pre- grasp of science, policy and leadership.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hunters Paths
    CONSERVATION Happy Birthday Selous! Africa’s Oldest Protected Area Celebrates The Selous Game Reserve, in southern Tanzania, is not only Africa’s largest protected area, but also its oldest. It celebrated its 120th birthday on May 7th. Although a portion of the reserve is used for photo-tourism, the majority of it is primarily for sustainable hunting tourism, making it Africa’s largest hunting area. Text and Photos: Dr. Rolf D. Baldus | Maps by Mike Shand hen Germany, a latecomer made clear by von Wissmann, then Imperial to European colonial expan- Governor, in a decree: “I felt obliged to issue W sion, declared Tanganyika this ordinance in order to conserve wildlife a Protectorate in 1885, the slaughter of and to prevent many species from becoming elephants had already surpassed its peak, extinct, which would happen soon if present and they were becoming rare. Two hun- conditions prevail ... We are obliged to think dred tons of ivory were exported every also of future generations, and should secure year from Zanzibar, the equivalent of 12,000 them the opportunity to enjoy the pleasure elephants. Commercial hunters could buy of hunting African game in the future.” licenses to shoot elephants for their ivory. It was commercial culling and not tradi- In Germany, fears of the imminent extinc- tional hunting by the local African population, tion of the formerly rich wildlife in Ger- which was considered unsustainable by the man East Africa became widespread after government. In their opinion, even a game- hunter-conservationists, among them Carl rich country like German East Africa could Georg Schillings, alerted the public in best- not conserve its wildlife in the long term if selling books.
    [Show full text]
  • Oil and Gas Industry Investments in the National Rifle Association and Safari Club International Reshaping American Energy, Land, and Wildlife Policy
    JOE RIIS JOE Oil and Gas Industry Investments in the National Rifle Association and Safari Club International Reshaping American Energy, Land, and Wildlife Policy By Matt Lee-Ashley April 2014 WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.ORG Oil and Gas Industry Investments in the National Rifle Association and Safari Club International Reshaping American Energy, Land, and Wildlife Policy By Matt Lee-Ashley April 2014 Contents 1 Introduction and summary 3 Oil and gas industry investments in three major sportsmen groups 5 Safari Club International 9 The National Rifle Association 11 Congressional Sportsmen’s Foundation 13 Impact of influence: How the oil and gas industry’s investments are paying off 14 Threats to endangered and threatened wildlife in oil- and gas-producing regions 19 Threats to the backcountry 22 Threats to public access and ownership 25 Conclusion 27 About the author and acknowledgments 28 Endnotes Introduction and summary Two bedrock principles have guided the work and advocacy of American sports- men for more than a century. First, under the North American Model of Wildlife Conservation, wildlife in the United States is considered a public good to be conserved for everyone and accessible to everyone, not a commodity that can be bought and owned by the highest bidder.1 Second, since President Theodore Roosevelt’s creation of the first wildlife refuges and national forests, sportsmen have fought to protect wildlife habitat from development and fragmentation to ensure healthy game supplies. These two principles, however, are coming under growing fire from an aggressive and coordinated campaign funded by the oil and gas industry. As part of a major effort since 2008 to bolster its lobbying and political power, the oil and gas industry has steadily expanded its contributions and influ- ence over several major conservative sportsmen’s organizations, including Safari Club International, or SCI, the National Rifle Association, or NRA, and the Congressional Sportsmen’s Foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Boone and Crockett Club on Fair Chase 9/5/2016
    THE BOONE AND CROCKETT CLUB ON FAIR CHASE 9/5/2016 Why a Discussion on Fair Chase? All significant human activities are conducted under a set of ethical principles that guide appropriate behavior. Depending on the activity, these principles are molded into laws when specific behavior is required. Without ethics and laws, most activities would become unsafe and unacceptable to both those who participate in them and those who do not. Hunting is no different. It, too, has principles and laws that guide ethical behavior. In modern, devel- oped societies, there exists a general expectation that hunting be conducted under appropriate conditions—animals are taken for legitimate purposes such as food, to attain wildlife agency management goals, and to mitigate property damage. It is also expected that the hunting is done sustainably and legally, and that hunters conduct themselves ethically by showing respect for the land and animals they hunt. In the broadest sense, hunters are guided by a conservation ethic, but the most common term used to describe the actual ethical pursuit of a big game animal is “fair chase.” The concept of fair chase has been widely promoted for over a century by the Boone and Crockett Club, an organi- zation founded by Theodore Roosevelt in 1887 to work towards saving what was left of dwindling North American wildlife populations. The Club defines fair chase as “the ethical, sportsmanlike, and lawful pursuit and taking of any free-ranging wild, native North American big game animal in a manner that does not give the hunter an improper advantage over such animals.” Fair chase has become a code of conduct for the American sportsman, helped shape the foundation of many of our game laws, and is taught to new hunters as they complete mandatory certification courses.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Updated: 1/4/2019 2:21 PM
    1 HISTORICAL FILES, Subject and Biographical A – Miscellaneous Abert, James Actors and Actresses Adair, John Adams Papers Adams, Daniel (Mrs.) Adkins, Betty Lawrence African American Genealogy African American History African Americans African Americans – Indiana African Americans – Kentucky African Americans – Louisville Ahrens, Theo (Jr.) Ainslie, Hew Alexander, Barton Stone Ali, Muhammad Allensworth, Allen Allison, John S. Allison, Young E. - Jr. & Sr. Almanacs Altsheller, Brent Alves, Bernard P. American Heritage American Letter Express Co. American Literary Manuscripts American Revolution American Revolution - Anecdotes American Revolution - Soldiers Amish - Indiana Anderson, Alex F. (Ship - Caroline) Anderson, James B. Anderson, Mary Anderson, Richard Clough Anderson, Robert Anderson, William Marshall Anderson, William P. Updated: 1/4/2019 2:21 PM 2 Andressohn, John C. Andrew's Raid (James J. Andrews) Antiques - Kentucky Antiquities - Kentucky Appalachia Applegate, Elisha Archaeology - Kentucky Architecture and Architects Architecture and Architects – McDonald Bros. Archival Symposium - Louisville (1970) Archivists and Archives Administration Ardery, Julia Spencer (Mrs. W. B.) Ark and Dove Arnold, Jeremiah Arthur Kling Center Asbury, Francis Ashby, Turner (Gen.) Ashland, KY Athletes Atkinson, Henry (Gen.) Audubon State Park (Henderson, KY) Augusta, KY Authors - KY Authors - KY - Allen, James Lane Authors - KY - Cawein, Madison Authors - KY - Creason, Joe Authors - KY - McClellan, G. M. Authors - KY - Merton, Thomas Authors - KY - Rice, Alice Authors - KY - Rice, Cale Authors - KY - Roberts, Elizabeth Madox Authors - KY - Sea, Sophie F. Authors - KY - Spears, W. Authors - KY - Still, James Authors - KY - Stober, George Authors - KY - Stuart, Jesse Authors - KY - Sulzer, Elmer G. Authors - KY - Warren, Robert Penn Authors - Louisville Auto License Automobiles Updated: 1/4/2019 2:21 PM 3 Awards B – Miscellaneous Bacon, Nathaniel Badin, Theodore (Rev.) Bakeless, John Baker, James G.
    [Show full text]
  • 6.0 Consultation and Coordination
    Chokecherry and Sierra Madre Final EIS Chapter 6.0 – Consultation and Coordination 6-1 6.0 Consultation and Coordination This EIS was conducted in accordance with NEPA requirements, CEQ regulations, and the DOI and BLM policies and procedures implementing NEPA. NEPA and the associated laws, regulations, and policies require the BLM to seek public involvement early in, and throughout, the planning process to develop a reasonable range of alternatives to PCW’s Proposed Action and prepare environmental documents that disclose the potential impacts of alternatives considered. Public involvement and agency consultation and coordination, which have been at the heart of the process leading to this draft EIS, were achieved through FR notices, public and informal meetings, individual contacts, media releases, and the project website. From the initial proposal of the project, the public and agencies have been approached for input on the project scope and development, as discussed in Chapter 1.0. This chapter describes this public involvement process as well as other key consultation and coordination. 6.1 Agency Participation and Coordination Specific regulations require the BLM to coordinate and consult with federal, state, and local agencies about the potential of the project and alternatives to affect sensitive environmental and human resources. The BLM initiated these coordination and consultation activities through the scoping process and has maintained them through regular meetings regarding key topics (e.g., alternatives and impact analyses)
    [Show full text]
  • The Pennsylvania State University the Graduate School the College
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School The College of the Liberal Arts ANIMALS, TECHNOLOGY, AND THE ZOOPOETICS OF AMERICAN MODERNISM A Dissertation in English by Christopher T. White 2008 Christopher T. White Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2008 ii The dissertation of Christopher T. White was reviewed and approved* by the following: Sanford Schwartz Associate Professor of English Thesis Advisor Chair of Committee Deborah Clarke Professor of English and Women’s Studies Mark Morrisson Associate Professor of English Susan Squier Brill Professor of Women’s Studies and English Philip Jenkins Sparks Professor of History and Religious Studies Robin Schulze Professor of English Head of the Department of English *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School iii Abstract This dissertation addresses a striking paradox of American modernity: the historical disappearance of wildlife from the natural environment and the simultaneous proliferation of animal forms across the cultural landscape—in literature, in visual and material culture, and in popular scientific writings during the half-century of dramatic change from 1890 to 1940. Across these venues the figure of the “vanishing animal” emerges as a dominant trope, as modern extinctions and the explosion of machine culture combine to frame animals within a spectral logic—disappearing, but more visible than ever. The first half of this dissertation examines the extensive technological, ideological, and representational apparatus through which animals and animal life are rendered in modern American culture, while the second half explores a significant, if surprising, correlative phenomenon whereby the modernized figure of the animal returns to haunt, and in fact disrupt, the very technics that facilitated its emergence in the first place.
    [Show full text]
  • The Inventory of the Theodore Roosevelt Collection #560
    The Inventory of the Theodore Roosevelt Collection #560 Howard Gotlieb Archival Research Center ROOSEVELT, THEODORE 1858-1919 Gift of Paul C. Richards, 1976-1990; 1993 Note: Items found in Richards-Roosevelt Room Case are identified as such with the notation ‘[Richards-Roosevelt Room]’. Boxes 1-12 I. Correspondence Correspondence is listed alphabetically but filed chronologically in Boxes 1-11 as noted below. Material filed in Box 12 is noted as such with the notation “(Box 12)”. Box 1 Undated materials and 1881-1893 Box 2 1894-1897 Box 3 1898-1900 Box 4 1901-1903 Box 5 1904-1905 Box 6 1906-1907 Box 7 1908-1909 Box 8 1910 Box 9 1911-1912 Box 10 1913-1915 Box 11 1916-1918 Box 12 TR’s Family’s Personal and Business Correspondence, and letters about TR post- January 6th, 1919 (TR’s death). A. From TR Abbott, Ernest H[amlin] TLS, Feb. 3, 1915 (New York), 1 p. Abbott, Lawrence F[raser] TLS, July 14, 1908 (Oyster Bay), 2 p. ALS, Dec. 2, 1909 (on safari), 4 p. TLS, May 4, 1916 (Oyster Bay), 1 p. TLS, March 15, 1917 (Oyster Bay), 1 p. Abbott, Rev. Dr. Lyman TLS, June 19, 1903 (Washington, D.C.), 1 p. TLS, Nov. 21, 1904 (Washington, D.C.), 1 p. TLS, Feb. 15, 1909 (Washington, D.C.), 2 p. Aberdeen, Lady ALS, Jan. 14, 1918 (Oyster Bay), 2 p. Ackerman, Ernest R. TLS, Nov. 1, 1907 (Washington, D.C.), 1 p. Addison, James T[hayer] TLS, Dec. 7, 1915 (Oyster Bay), 1p. Adee, Alvey A[ugustus] TLS, Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • The Boone and Crockett Club on Conservation and Preservation
    THE BOONE AND CROCKETT CLUB ON CONSERVATION AND PRESERVATION Why a Discussion of Conservation and Preservation More people are engaging in and having a greater influence on natural resource issues than ever before through voter initiatives, public forums, and social media. They want to do what is best, yet are not necessarily familiar with the two primary approaches by which natural resources are managed— conservation and preservation. Conservation and preservation are terms everyone has heard of, but for many people they remain loosely defined and not well understood. There is a growing belief that “letting nature take its course” with no human interference is the best philosophy for the treatment of natural resources. Many are mistakenly or intentionally calling this way of thinking conservation, though it is more closely aligned with preservation. These misconceptions are helping to shift the management of natural resources from a successful “hands-on” conservation approach to a “hands-off” preservation approach, which is proving to have serious negative implications. Conservation and preservation are both concerned with protection and betterment of the environment, but they are based on different philosophies that produce different results. Conservation focuses on using and managing natural resources to benefit people, but in keeping within the limits of supply, regrowth, and change, both natural and human-influenced. It is the most widely used and accepted model for the management of natural resources, including wildlife, in North America. Preservation is a philosophy that generally views people as a negative influence on nature, and seeks to keep natural resources in a pristine state by limiting use and excluding active management by people.
    [Show full text]
  • Life of Frederick Courtenay Selous, D.S.O. Capt
    LIFE OF FREDERICK COURTENAY SELOUS, D.S.O. CAPT. 25TH ROYAL FUSILIERS Chapter XI - XV BY J. G. MILLAIS, F.Z.S. CHAPTER XI 1906-1907 In April, 1906, Selous went all the way to Bosnia just to take the nest and eggs of the Nutcracker, and those who are not naturalists can scarcely understand such excessive enthusiasm. This little piece of wandering, however, seemed only an incentive to further restlessness, which he himself admits, and he was off again on July 12th to Western America for another hunt in the forests, this time on the South Fork of the MacMillan river. On August 5th he started from Whitehorse on the Yukon on his long canoe-journey down the river, for he wished to save the expense of taking the steamer to the mouth of the Pelly. He was accompanied by Charles Coghlan, who had been with him the previous year, and Roderick Thomas, a hard-bitten old traveller of the North- West. Selous found no difficulty in shooting the rapids on the Yukon, and had a pleasant trip in fine weather to Fort Selkirk, where he entered the Pelly on August 9th. Here he was lucky enough to kill a cow moose, and thus had an abundance of meat to take him on the long up-stream journey to the MacMillan mountains, which could only be effected by poling and towing. On August 18th he killed a lynx. At last, on August 28th, he reached a point on the South Fork of the MacMillan, where it became necessary to leave the canoe and pack provisions and outfit up to timber-line.
    [Show full text]
  • Participant List
    Participant List Name Organization Business Phone Business Email Achterman, Gail Inst. for Nat. Resources, OR State Univ. 541-740-3190 [email protected] Ack, Brad Puget Sound Action Team Partnership 360-725-5437 [email protected] Ackelson, Mark Iowa Natural Heritage Foundation 515-288-1846 [email protected] Adair, Steve Ducks Unlimited, Inc. 701-355-3511 [email protected] Adams, Bruce San Juan County Commission 435-587-2820 [email protected] Adams, Laurie Davies Coevolution Institute 415-362-1137 [email protected] Adams, Les Ntn’l Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration 202-482-6090 [email protected] Addor, Mary Lou Natural Resources Leadership Institute 919-515-9602 [email protected] Adkins, Carol Federal Highway Administration 202-366-2024 [email protected] Agpaoa, Liz USDA Forest Service 202-205-1661 [email protected] Albrecht, Virginia S. Hunton & Williams, LLP 202-955-1943 [email protected] Alden Weingardt, Susan USDA Forest Service 510-559-6342 [email protected] Aldrich, James The Nature Conservancy 859-259-9655 [email protected] Allen, Diana National Park Service 314-436-1324 x112 [email protected] Anderson, Bob United Winegrowers for Sonoma County 707-433-7319 [email protected] Anderson, David Office of Management and Budget [email protected] Anderson, John R. Monsanto Company 919-821-9295 [email protected] Annand, Fred The Nature Conservancy, NC Chapter 919-403-8558 [email protected] Antoine, AICP, Todd Great Rivers Greenway District 314-436-7009 [email protected] Anzalone, Ronald D. Advisory Council on Historic Preservation 202-606-8523 [email protected] Arce, Mardi NPS, Jefferson National Expansion Memorial 314-655-1643 [email protected] Archuletta, Phil P&M Plastics, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Review 12-04 December 2012
    The North American Model of Wildlife Conservation Technical Review 12-04 December 2012 1 The North American Model of Wildlife Conservation The Wildlife Society and The Boone and Crockett Club Technical Review 12-04 - December 2012 Citation Organ, J.F., V. Geist, S.P. Mahoney, S. Williams, P.R. Krausman, G.R. Batcheller, T.A. Decker, R. Carmichael, P. Nanjappa, R. Regan, R.A. Medellin, R. Cantu, R.E. McCabe, S. Craven, G.M. Vecellio, and D.J. Decker. 2012. The North American Model of Wildlife Conservation. The Wildlife Society Technical Review 12-04. The Wildlife Society, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. Series Edited by Theodore A. Bookhout Copy Edit and Design Terra Rentz (AWB®), Managing Editor, The Wildlife Society Lisa Moore, Associate Editor, The Wildlife Society Maja Smith, Graphic Designer, MajaDesign, Inc. Cover Images Front cover, clockwise from upper left: 1) Canada lynx (Lynx canadensis) kittens removed from den for marking and data collection as part of a long-term research study. Credit: John F. Organ; 2) A mixed flock of ducks and geese fly from a wetland area. Credit: Steve Hillebrand/USFWS; 3) A researcher attaches a radio transmitter to a short-horned lizard (Phrynosoma hernandesi) in Colorado’s Pawnee National Grassland. Credit: Laura Martin; 4) Rifle hunter Ron Jolly admires a mature white-tailed buck harvested by his wife on the family’s farm in Alabama. Credit: Tes Randle Jolly; 5) Caribou running along a northern peninsula of Newfoundland are part of a herd compositional survey. Credit: John F. Organ; 6) Wildlife veterinarian Lisa Wolfe assesses a captive mule deer during studies of density dependence in Colorado.
    [Show full text]
  • Circular 5. Organization and Officials
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Circular No. 5 fy' ii^iMcC^m Issued April 1943 ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICIALS CONCERNED WITH WILDLIFE PROTECTION: 1942 Compiled by Harry C. Oberholser Division of Public Relations, Fish and Wildlife Service CONTENTS I'age Introduction 1 Newfoundland Government organizations 2$ United States Government organizations 2 Organizations in Mexico. 2* General non-government organizations 5 Organizations in the West Indies 24 Organizations in States and Territories 8 Organizations in Central America 24 Canadian Government organizations 22 Organizations in South America 24 Organizations in Canadian Provinces and Territories 22 INTRODUCTION Following the practice of the Bureau of Biological Survey, the Fish and Wildlife Service issues this, the forty-first edition of the directory of organizations and officials concerned with wildlife pro- tection. It is designed to meet the needs of officials charged with the administration and enforcement of fish and game laws, and is also for the convenient use of persons desiring to communicate with officials and organizations concerning wdldlife conditions in the several States and Territories, the Canadian Provinces and Territories, New^foundland, Mexico, the West Indies, Central America, and South America. Including chiefly the organizations that are national or State-wide in character, the directory follows the general form of previous editions.^ Details regarding the seasons for migratory game bird hunting and restrictions thereon may be obtained
    [Show full text]