The Use of Fish and Wildlife in Clark's Point, Alaska

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Use of Fish and Wildlife in Clark's Point, Alaska THE USE OF FISH AND WILDLIFE IN CLARK’S POINT, ALASKA by Jody Seitz Technical Paper No. 186 Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Subsistence Juneau, Alaska May 1996 The Alaska Department of Fish and Game operates all of its public programs and activities free from discrimination on the basis of sex, color, race, religion, national origin, age, marital status, pregnancy, parenthood, or disability. For information on alternative formats available .for this and other department publications, please contact the department ADA Coordinator at (voice) 907- 465-4720, (TDD) l-800-478-3548 or (fax) 907-586-6595. Any person who believes she or he has been discriminated against should write to: Alaska Department of Fish and Game PO Box 25526 Juneau, AK 99802-5526 or O.E.O. U. S. Department of the Interior Washington, D. C. 20240 ABSTRACT This report describes patterns of hunting, fishing, and gathering of wild resources in the community of Clark’s Point, on the northeastern shore of Nushagak Bay in the Bristol Bay region of southwest Alaska, 305 miles southwest of Anchorage. The study year was from November 1988 through October 1989. In the fall of 1989, the community of Clark’s Point and neighboring Ekuk (now used primarily as a summer fish camp) combined had 17 year-round households. The average household size was 3.3 individuals. The population of Clark’s Point was 56 (55 percent male, 45 percent female). Of all the residents, 92.9 percent were of Alaska Native descent. Over one half of the population was born in Clark’s Point (55.4 percent); 23.2 percent were born in other Bristol Bay communities, and 8.9 percent were born in other Alaska communities. Only 7.1 percent were born outside Alaska. (Place of birth information was missing for 5.4 percent.) The average amount of time all residents had lived at Clark’s Point was 19.2 years. The average length of residency for adults over I8 years of age was 26.2 years. The local cash economy was based primarily on commercial fishing. In 1989 Clark’s Point residents held a total of 6 commercial setnet and 7 commercial driftnet salmon permits. This is a decline from 1988 when the community held 12 drift and 1 I setnet permits. There were only three full-time, year- round jobs at Clark’s Point, although most adults (83.8 percent) were employed for at least part of the study year. Within any one household an average of 3.4 jobs were held. The average length of employment was 6.9 months Many individuals worked more than one job and some shared their jobs with a spouse or son or daughter. In 1989, the cost of living (based on nine standard expenditures) averaged $997 per household. The cost of food in Dillingham, the regional center, was 1.63 times higher than that of Anchorage. The 1988189 cash income at Clark’s Point averaged $9,718 per capita, compared to $17,610 for the State of Alaska in 1989. Participant observation and interviews in conjunction with harvest surveys found that subsistence activities in 1989 continued to be a vital aspect of community life in Clark’s Point. Residents followed a seasonal round of activities conditioned by transportation, equipment availability, resource availability, weather, and hunting and fishing regulations. High levels of resource use and harvest at Clark’s Point were found in 1989. The mean household harvest was I ,I 96 pounds (usable weight), while the per capita harvest was 363 pounds. One hundred percent of the households in the community used salmon and wild plants. Ninety-four percent used non-salmon fish; 77 percent used marine mammals; 82 percent used land mammals; and 88 percent used birds and eggs In addition, all households in the community harvested some wild food during the study year. For example, 88 percent of all households harvested salmon as well as birds and eggs; 82 percent of all households harvested non-salmon fish; 47 percent harvested marine mammals, big game, and small land mammals; 12 percent harvested marine invertebrates; and every household harvested berries. Clark’s Point residents used in total 64 kinds of fish, game and plant resources in 1988/89. The average number of resources used per household was 20.7 and ranged between a low of 6 and a high of 39 different wild foods. Salmon comprised about 49 percent of the overall harvest of wild resources for home use. The salmon were harvested and processed in the traditional manner by drying and smoking. The 1989 harvest of salmon was a much higher percentage of the total harvest than in 1973 (22 percent), although the per capita harvest of all resources in 1973/74 of 335 pounds (excluding plants) was very close to that of 1989. The difference in the amount of salmon harvested may be a result of a change in the regulatory structure for subsistence fishing in the commercial district. When the permit data base was compared with the salmon harvest with subsistence gear from the harvest survey, the extrapolated totals from the permits gave somewhat higher estimates than the harvest survey. However, the harvest survey also recorded salmon taken home from commercial catches. Sockeye and chinook salmon brought home from the commercial catch raised the amount of salmon used for home use considerably over the permit data base extrapolated totals. The difference may result from the harvesters not including salmon taken from their commercial catches on their subsistence permits, In the 1988189 study year, residents of Clark’s Point carried out most of their harvest activities within Game Management Units 17 and 9. They harvested moose and caribou during the regulatory open seasons, and trapped furbearers, primarily beaver, within the area between the Nushagak River and Etolin Point. Of the overall harvest, moose and caribou comprised 23.9 percent by weight. Small land mammals made up 2.1 percent and marine mammals 3.8 percent of the overall harvest by weight. Moose, caribou, and marine mammals were distributed within the community and with relatives in other villages as well. For example, 64.7 percent of the households received caribou from harvesters outside their households, 70.6 percent received moose, and 41.2 percent received seal meat or oil. There were other differences in the harvest composition between 1988189 and 1973174. Big game harvests in 1988189 represented a smaller percentage of the overall harvest than in 1973/74 (23.9 percent compared to 37.3 percent). Marine mammals were a much smaller percentage of the 1989 harvest than in 1973 (3.8 compared to 22.3 percent). In 1973 the harvest was more equally distributed by weight between salmon, non-salmon fish, big game, and marine mammals, than in 1989, when salmon and big game made up about 73 percent of the total harvest by weight. Additionally, in 1989, more households harvested salmon than in 1973, but a smaller percentage of the 1989 households harvested big game, furbearers, or marine mammals In summary, in 1988/89, Clark’s Point demonstrated the characteristics of a community with a mixed cash/subsistence economy. Subsistence activities were an integral part of daily life, in which households cooperated and shared with each other. The per capita harvest was similar to that of I7 years earlier. There were extensive networks of sharing among households at Clark’s Point and between other villages in the region and a few outside Bristol Bay. TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS . i LIST OF TABLES . ..... iii LIST OF FIGURES . ... iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . v CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION.. ............................................................................................... 1 Background ................................................................................................................................ I Purpose ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Research Methods ..................................................................................................................... 3 Limitations of the Data.. .............................................................................................................. 4 CHAPTER TWO: THE COMMUNITY AND THE AREA.. ................................................................ 5 location and Natural Environment.. ............................................................................................ 5 History of the Area.. .................................................................................................................... 7 The Historic Seasonal Round ................................................................................................... IO Historic Demography.. .............................................................................................................. I2 The Contemporary Community ............................................................................................... 12 Demography.. ........................................................................................................................ 12 Services and Facilities.. ....................................... ................................................................. 16 Employment ........................................................................................................................... I8 Monetary Income.. ................................................................................................................. 21 Cost of Living.. ......................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • ICE SPEARING DECOYS and RELATED PARAPHERNALIA, an ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY and INDEX
    ICE SPEARING DECOYS and RELATED PARAPHERNALIA, AN ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY AND INDEX by Gary L. Miller Copyright 1980 – May 3, 2016 Author’s note: This is intended to be a dual purpose document. It can be used in this digital format (or printed out) as a traditional bibliography or it can be used as a digital index by utilizing your computer’s search function. Either way I think you will find it a very useful tool. BOOKS: Anonymous. The Sportsman’s Portfolio of American Field Sports. Boston: M. M. Ballou, 1855. (Pp.20 and 24 contain illustrations and descriptions of fishing with tip-ups for pike and smelt). Apfelbaum, Ben, Eli Gottlieb and Steven J. Michaan. Beneath the Ice, The Art of the Spear Fishing Decoy. New York: E. P. Dutton and Company in association with The Museum of American Folk Art, 1990. (Basically an exhibition catalog for the exhibit of the same name. Beautifully photographed. Minimal text.) Baron, Frank R. and Raymond L. Carver. Bud Stewart, Michigan’s Legendary Lure Maker. Hillsdale, Michigan: Ferguson Communications, 1990. (228 pages with hundreds of black & white and color illustrations but poor photo editing resulted in many items being chopped off in the pictures. Nevertheless an essential reference for the Bud Stewart collector. An interesting commentary on ice spear fishing and decoys by Bud that curiously is not entirely consistent with the actual decoys). Baron, Frank R. One Fish, Two Fish, Green Fish, Blue Fish. Livonia, Michigan: Frank Baron, 1992. (A homemade booklet comprised of copies of articles and essays by Frank Baron, Harold Dickert and Marcel Salive, most of which were previously published in various periodicals and in Frank’s own decoy sale lists.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 CJS Prod Guide.Pdf
    � 2020 Product Guide ICE AND OPEN WATER FISHING ® Inc. ® ® ® S IT’S INK ALI T TH VE HE T Flu Flu WORM THA AMERICA’S PREMIER PANFISH LURE Our Mission From humble basement beginnings nearly 30 years ago, Custom Jigs & Spins is still a family-run company with the same Table Of Contents simple mission – build high-quality jigs & tackle that catches fish. Custom Jigs & Spins® Tackle Flu Flu™ Tackle 1 ... Wölfinkee 30-31 .. Flu Flu Jigs & Floaters 2-5 .. Top Tungsten Ice Jigs: Chekai, Majmün, B-Fish-N® Tackle JaJe and Glazba with Pro Panfish Picks 33 ... H2O Precision Jig 6-7 ... RPM - Rotating Power Minnow 34 ... Draggin’ Jig & “Bucktail” Wayne’s Bucktail Jig 8 .. The Original Slender Spoon 35 ... MasterFlash Jig 9 ... Hammered Slender Spoon 37 ... B3 Blade Bait & PFDC - Pro Finesse Drop Chain AuthentX™ Plastic Series 10 ... Pro Series Slender Spoon 39 ... Moxi 11 ... Pro-Glow Series Slender Spoon 40-41 ... Pulse-R 13 ... The Original Demon 43 ... Ribb-Finn 14 ... Mega Glow Demon & Demon Perch Eye 6 45 ... 4” Ringworm 15 ... Demon Jigging Spoon 46 .. 3.25” Paddletail 16 ... Slip Dropper System 47 ... 5” K-Grub 17 ... 2-Spot ® 18 ... Rocker The Worm Tackle 19 ... Striper Special 48-49 .. The Worm Pre-Rig 21 ... ’Gill Pill & Diamond Jig Accessories 22 ... Purest 50-51 ... Rose Creek Waterproof and Polar Style Jig and Spoon Boxes, 23 ... Ratfinkee .... plus CJS Lure Boxes 24 ... Ratso 52.... CJS Spoon Boxes, Nuclear Flash Micro Charger, LED Flashlight and 25 ... Shrimpo Tungsten Toothpick 26 ... Finesse Plastic, Noodel & Micro Noodel 53.... Decals and AuthentX Hats & Tee Shirts 27 ..
    [Show full text]
  • Means Fishing with Hook and Line Which Shall Be Personally Attended, but Shall Not Include Ice Fishing Or Snagging Or Snatching
    Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies Sec. 26-112-43. Definitions and restrictions (a) “Angling” means fishing with hook and line which shall be personally attended, but shall not include ice fishing or snagging or snatching. Not more than three lines, with or without rods, may be used at one time except in Trout Management Areas, Wild Trout Management Areas, Trout Parks, Sea-run Trout Streams and Trophy Trout Streams, as listed in section 26-112-46 of the Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies, where no more than two lines may be used at one time. Each line may have any combination of hooks, flies or lures, among which not more than three hooks may be baited. (b) “Bait” means any animal, bait species as defined in section 26-112-45(d) of the Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies, fish eggs, insect or vegetable, or parts thereof, living or dead, except for certain nuisance aquatic invertebrates as provided for in section 26-55-5 of the Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies, used with a hook for the purpose of attracting and catching fish. Any fish legally acquired, except black bass (largemouth and smallmouth), chain pickerel, northern pike, trout, charr, salmon, carp and goldfish may be used as bait, except as provided in section 26-112-48(b) of the Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies. (c) “Bait fishing” means taking or attempting to take bait species, for personal use as bait or food, by use of a bait seine, bait trap, umbrella net, scoop net or by hand. (d) “Bait seine” means a seine or net which, for the purpose of this regulation, does not exceed fifteen feet in length and four feet in depth and is used for the taking of bait species.
    [Show full text]
  • BSIERP B69 Appendix
    Technical Paper No. 371 Subsistence Harvests and Uses in Three Bering Sea Communities, 2008: Akutan, Emmonak, and Togiak by James A. Fall, Caroline L. Brown, Nicole M. Braem, Lisa Hutchinson-Scarbrough, David Koster, Theodore M. Krieg, and Andrew R. Brenner December 2012 Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Subsistence Symbols and Abbreviations The following symbols and abbreviations, and others approved for the Système International d'Unités (SI), are used without definition in the reports by the Division of Subsistence. All others, including deviations from definitions listed below, are noted in the text at first mention, as well as in the titles or footnotes of tables, and in figure or figure captions. Weights and measures (metric) General Mathematics, statistics centimeter cm Alaska Administrative Code AAC all standard mathematical signs, symbols deciliter dL all commonly-accepted and abbreviations gram g abbreviations e.g., alternate hypothesis HA hectare ha Mr., Mrs., base of natural logarithm e kilogram kg AM, PM, etc. catch per unit effort CPUE kilometer km all commonly-accepted coefficient of variation CV liter L professional titles e.g., Dr., Ph.D., common test statistics (F, t, 2, etc.) meter m R.N., etc. confidence interval CI milliliter mL at @ correlation coefficient (multiple) R millimeter mm compass directions: correlation coefficient (simple) r east E covariance cov Weights and measures (English) north N degree (angular ) ° cubic feet per second ft3/s south S degrees of freedom df foot ft west W expected value E gallon gal copyright greater than > inch in corporate suffixes: greater than or equal to mile mi Company Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Ice Fishing Chapter
    S E C T I O N INTRODUCTION9 TO ICE FISHING Not only is fishing a great summertime activity, it’s also a fun winter pastime. Ice fishing is a great way to spend those cold winter days. Many species of fish can be caught through the ice. For certain species, ice fishing can often be better than open-water fishing. The main species sought by ice anglers are pike, pickerel, walleye, panfish (sunfish, yellow perch and crappie), and rainbow, brown and lake trout. Fishing access can often be better during the winter. Anglers normally limited to shore during open-water seasons can access an entire lake, as long as the ice is thick enough. Beginners’ Guide to Freshwater Fishing 75 INTRODUCTION TO ICE FISHING WHAT GEAR WILL YOU NEED? Ice Augers and Spud Bars In order to ice fish, you must first cut a hole through the ice. This can be done with either a spud bar or an ice auger. Spud Bar (Ice Chisel) Ice Auger A metal rod with a sharp tip used for chiseling a hole A device to drill or cut a hole through the ice. through the ice and checking ice thickness. Be sure Hand augers require muscle power. Power augers to have a lanyard attached to your spud, to avoid use a motor. Power augers are heavier and much losing it through the ice. more expensive, but they allow you to drill holes quicker and easier. Augers come in a variety of Spud Bar sizes. The larger the size, the harder it is to cut a hole through the ice.
    [Show full text]
  • Population Monitoring and Status of the Nushagak Peninsula Caribou Herd
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Population Monitoring and Status of the Nushagak Peninsula Caribou Herd, 1988-2012 Andy R. Aderman Togiak National Wildlife Refuge Dillingham, Alaska August 2013 Citation: Aderman, A. R. 2013. Population monitoring and status of the Nushagak Peninsula caribou herd, 1988-2012. Togiak National Wildlife Refuge, Dillingham, Alaska. 30 pp. Keywords: caribou, Rangifer tarandus, Togiak National Wildlife Refuge, southwestern Alaska, calf production, recruitment, survival, population estimate, subsistence harvest, management implications Disclaimer: The use of trade names of commercial products in this report does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the federal government. Population Monitoring and Status of the Nushagak Peninsula Caribou Herd, 1988-2012 Andy R. Aderman1 ABSTRACT In February 1988, 146 caribou were reintroduced to the Nushagak Peninsula. From 1988 to 2013, radio collars were deployed on female caribou and monitored monthly. High calf recruitment and adult female survival allowed the population to grow rapidly (r = 0.226), peaking at 1,399 caribou in 1997. Population density on the Nushagak Peninsula reached approximately 1.2 caribou per km2 in 1997 and 1998. During the next decade, calf recruitment and adult female survival decreased and the population declined (r = -0.105) to 546 caribou in 2006. The population remained at about 550 caribou until 2009 and then increased to 902 by 2012. Subsistence hunting removed from 0-12.3% of the population annually from 1995-2012. Decreased nutrition and other factors likely caused an unstable age distribution and subsequent population decline after the peak in 1997. Dispersal, disease, unreported harvest and predation implications for caribou populations are discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Tips and Tactics for Catching Lakers Through the Ice by Tim Moore
    Togue Time!Tips and tactics for catching lakers through the ice by Tim Moore STOCKPHOTO.COM i © LEMONADE LUCY / FEDBUL - COMPOSITE IMAGE 4 January / February 2018 he crisp air, the frozen surface of a lake, the One day, while out with a group of ice anglers on Lake Tsilence broken only by the sound of ice augers Winnipesaukee, we began the trip jigging. The previous day, we had and snowmobiles, and the challenge of pursuing New done well jigging in this same Hampshire’s largest wild trout species. These are spot, and I felt confident that this day would be no different. A few some of the things that inspire ice anglers to get out lakers showed some interest early, onto New Hampshire’s frozen lakes each winter to but no takers. Then it was as if they had vanished. I was hesitant catch lake trout through the ice. to abandon such a consistent loca- tion, so I decided to try a couple Togue, laker, namaycush – whatever you call them, lake trout tip-ups with live smelt. Before I could get the second tip-up provide great fishing action through the ice during the long in the water, the flag went up on the first! I spent the next winter months in New Hampshire. few hours cycling between the two tip-ups. The action was As soon as the season opens and the ice is safe enough to non-stop. Later that afternoon, everything changed, and we fish, anglers from around New England flock to lakes such as were back to jigging.
    [Show full text]
  • Angler Guide
    Beneath the Ice ce fishing on lakes or reservoirs can provide some Imuch-needed outdoor adventure during those long winter months. Yellow perch and rainbow trout are the most common species pursued beneath the ice, and a number of Idaho waters have both species in abundance . Ice is generally safe for walking when 3 to 4 inches thick; if you are venturing out on snow machines or ATVs, wait for 8 to 10 inches of clear, solid ice. Ice fishing with a partner is a good idea, particularly during early and late winter. While specialized ice fishing gear is available, any rod and reel will suffice for the casual ice angler. Terminal tackle should include an assortment of jigs, glow hooks and ice flies, in combination with baits such as maggots, worms or cut bait. Ice Fishing Equipment Mike Demick, IDFG Ice Auger Kids and ice fishing - they go together! To get started, drill a series of test holes. Rules Ice Fishing Rod dictate that no hole may be larger than 10 inches in diameter for safety’s sake. Most Idaho waters allow for up to 5 lines per angler (when the bite is on, it gets busy!). Try different locations at varying depths until you find fish. Perch generally are found near the bottom, whether the water is 10 feet deep or 40, Ladle while trout tend to be found closer to the surface. Jigging can be a very effective ice fishing technique. To jig, drop the bait to the bottom, then reel up approximately 2 feet of line.
    [Show full text]
  • Iowa Fishing Regulations
    www.iowadnr.gov/fishing 1 Contents What’s New? Be a Responsible Angler .....................................3 • Mississippi River walleye length limit License & Permit Requirements ..........................3 changes - length limits in Mississippi Threatened & Endangered Species ....................4 River Pools 12-20 now include the entire Health Benefits of Eating Fish .............................4 Mississippi River in Iowa (p. 12). General Fishing Regulations ...............................5 • Missouri River paddlefish season start Fishing Seasons & Limits ....................................9 date changed to Feb. 1 (p. 11) Fish Identification...............................................14 • Virtual fishing tournaments added to License Agreements with Bordering States .......16 Iowa DNR special events applications Health Advisories for Eating Fish.......................17 - the definition of fishing tournaments now Aquatic Invasive Species...................................18 includes virtual fishing tournaments (p. 6) Fisheries Offices Phone Numbers .....................20 First Fish & Master Angler Awards ....................21 Conservation Officers Phone Numbers .............23 License and Permit Fees License/Permit Resident Nonresident On Sale Dec. 15, 2020 On Sale Jan. 1, 2021 Annual 16 years old and older $22.00 $48.00 3-Year $62.00 Not Available 7-Day $15.50 $37.50 3-Day Not Available $20.50 1-Day $10.50 $12.00 Annual Third Line Fishing Permit $14.00 $14.00 Trout Fee $14.50 $17.50 Lifetime (65 years old and older) $61.50 Not Available Boundary Water Sport Trotline $26.00 $49.50 Fishing Tournament Permit $25.00 $25.00 Fishing, Hunting, Habitat Fee Combo $55.00 Not Available Paddlefish Fishing License & Tag $25.50 $49.00 Give your kids a lifetime of BIG memories The COVID-19 pandemic ignited Iowans’ pent-up passion to get out and enjoy the outdoors.
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts Saltwater Recreational Fishing
    MASSACHUSETTS Saltwater SPECIAL SHOW EDITION FULL REGULATIONS COMING IN APRIL NEW Artificial Reef page 13 2017 RECREATIONAL FISHING GUIDE Recreational Saltwater Massachusetts Saltwater Lobstering and Crabbing Fishing Regulations Fishing Derby Bait & Tackle Shops Commonly Caught Massachusetts Saltwater Species Fishing Calendar Charter & Head Boats DIVISION OF MARINE FISHERIES DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME VACATION TOMORROW. VACATION TODAY. SAVE Some discounts, coverages, payment plans and features are not available in all states or all GEICO companies. Boat and PWC coverages are underwritten by Seaworthy Insurance Company, a GEICO company. GEICO is a registered service mark of Government Employees Insurance Company, Washington, D.C. 20076; a Berkshire Hathaway Inc. subsidiary. GEICO Gecko image © 1999-2017. © 2017 GEICO See how much you could save onboatinsurance. couldsave muchyou how See geico.com | 1-800-865-4846 | Local Offi ce geico.com |1-800-865-4846 Offi |Local for yourboa t Contents NEW Artificial Reef | 13 Species Lobster Gear | 34 Profile| 10 Best Handling Practices | 9 Welcome Letter ........................................................ 2 State Fish Records ................................................. 17 General Information .............................................. 4 How to Measure Your Catch ............................... 17 Reward for Tagged Fish ......................................... 5 Massachusetts Saltwater Fishing Derby .......... 18 Common Rigs and Knots ...................................... 6 Saltwater
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Subsistence Board Proceedings, April 13, 1994
    STAFF ANALYSIS TEMPORARY SPECIAL ACTION WSA16-02 ISSUES Temporary Special Action Request WSA16-02, submitted by the Togiak National Wildlife Refuge (NWR) and the Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADF&G), requests that Federal public lands on the Nushagak Peninsula be opened to the harvest of caribou by all Alaska residents when the population is above 900 caribou. DISCUSSION The Nushagak Peninsula Caribou Herd (NPCH) is a growing population that is currently well above the population objectives outlined in the Nushagak Peninsula Caribou Management Plan. In recent years, harvest has been below average, owing largely to poor winter travel conditions that prevented hunters from accessing caribou. The proponents are concerned that if the population continues to grow, severe range degradation could occur, causing the herd to move from the Peninsula to areas where favorable forage conditions exist. Expanding the opportunity to harvest caribou on the Nushagak Peninsula to all Alaska residents could be helpful in reducing the population to desired levels and preventing overuse of the range. The proponents believe that increased harvest in the near term will benefit subsistence users in the long term by stabilizing the population, thereby providing a consistent opportunity to harvest caribou on the Nushagak Peninsula. This request was submitted with a letter of support from Choggiung Ltd., an Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA) village corporation and land owner on the Nushagak Peninsula (Appendix 1). The applicable Federal regulations are found in 36 CFR 242.19(b) and 50 CFR 100.19(b) (Temporary Special Actions) and state that: …After adequate notice and public hearing, the Board may temporarily close or open public lands for the taking of fish and wildlife for subsistence uses, or modify the requirements for subsistence take, or close public lands for the taking of fish and wildlife for nonsubsistence uses, or restrict take for nonsubsistence uses.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Alaska's Wildlife
    Managing Alaska’s Wildlife 2010 Report Division of Wildlife Conservation Alaska Department of Fish & Game Director’s Message In my nearly 25 years working as a wildlife profes­ sional with the Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADF&G), I have had the incredible opportunity and pleasure of working with a variety of species in man­ agement and research efforts. From Sitka black-tailed deer, mountain goats, river otters, and black bears in Southeast Alaska, to caribou, moose, wolves, sheep, and brown bears in Northwest Alaska, the encoun­ ters have been phenomenal and memorable. Doug Larsen, director of the Division of Today, as the director of the Division of Wildlife Con- Wildlife Conservation, with a sedated servation, I have the opportunity to see first-hand on mountain goat. Aerial darting is an a regular basis the diversity of responsibilities that important tool for wildlife biologists in face our staff as we seek to conserve and enhance the Alaska, and Larsen’s experience darting State’s wildlife and habitats and provide for a wide goats paid off in 2005 when DWC began range of public uses and benefits. an ongoing study monitoring mountain Management activities conducted by ADF&G include, goat populations and the goats’ seasonal movements in the coastal mountains among other things, surveying populations of moose, north of Juneau. caribou, sheep, goats, bears, and wolves; assessing habitat conditions; regulating harvests of predator and prey populations; providing information and education opportunities to the public; and responding to a host of issues and concerns. We’re extremely fortunate at the Alaska Depart­ ment of Fish and Game to have skilled, educated, experienced, and dedicated staff to enable us to fulfill our mission.
    [Show full text]