DOCSLIB.ORG

Ottawa National Forest

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

United States Department of Agriculture Ottawa National Forest Forest Service Eastern Region Monitoring Evaluation Report Fiscal Years 2012‐2016 October 2017 Caring for the Land and Serving People 2012-2016 Monitoring Evaluation Report Citation: USDA Forest Service. 2017. Ottawa National Forest Fiscal Years 2012-2016 Monitoring Evaluation Report. Ironwood, MI. Short name for citations in documents produced on the Ottawa – FY 2012-2016 ME Report Responsible Official Forest Supervisor For More Information Kathleen Atkinson Linda L. Jackson Marlanea French-Pombier Regional Forester Ottawa National Forest Forest Planner USDA Forest Service E6248 US Highway 2 E6248 US Highway 2 Eastern Region Ironwood, MI 49938 Ironwood, MI 49938 626 E. Wisconsin Avenue Phone: 906-932-1330 Phone: 906-932-1330 x303 Milwaukee, WI 53202 [email protected] [email protected] In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at: http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture, office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410; (2) fax: (202) 690-7442; or (3) email: [email protected]. USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender. i 2012‐2016 Monitoring Evaluation Report The Mission of the Forest Service is to sustain the health, diversity and productivity of the Nation’s forests and grasslands to meet the needs of present and future generations. Lake Ste. Kathryn Kenton Ranger District Table of Contents Summary of Findings ...................................................................................................................... v 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Monitoring and Evaluation Requirements ................................................................................ 1 2.1 Monitoring Program .............................................................................................................. 2 2.2 Monitoring Evaluation Implementation Guide (Monitoring Guide) ..................................... 2 2.3 Biennial Monitoring Evaluation Report ................................................................................ 2 3.0 History of Monitoring Activities on the Ottawa National Forest ............................................. 3 4.0 Monitoring Activities during the Biennial Reporting Period ................................................... 4 5.0 Monitoring Results.................................................................................................................... 5 Question 1: How do actual outputs and services compare to those outputs and services in the Forest Plan? ................................................................................................................................. 5 Question 2: How close are actual costs compared to projected costs? ...................................... 8 Question 3: Comparison of Projected and Actual Output Levels and the Mix of Sawtimber and Pulpwood ............................................................................................................................ 13 ii 2012‐2016 Monitoring Evaluation Report Question 4: Are insect and disease population levels compatible with objectives for restoring or maintaining healthy forest conditions? ................................................................................. 18 Question 5: What is the status of visitor use and visitor satisfaction? ..................................... 22 Question 6: How effective are forest management practices in managing OHV use for the protection of forest resources? .................................................................................................. 27 Question 7: Are harvested lands adequately restocked after 5 years? ..................................... 32 Status of Suited Lands (Questions 8a and 8b) ........................................................................... 34 Question 8a: To what extent are timber management activities occurring on lands suited for timber production? .................................................................................................................... 34 Question 8b - To what extent have conditions, or information, changed the classification of lands "not suited" for timber production to "suitable" for timber production? ......................... 37 Question 9: Acres of temporary opening, managed to exceed 40 acres in size, by forest type. ................................................................................................................................................... 39 Question 10: Is Forest Plan implementation resulting in impacts that may substantially and permanently impair the productivity of the land? ..................................................................... 43 Question 11: Are northern hardwood forest management activities promoting the regeneration of mid-tolerant tree species, specifically basswood, red oak, white pine and yellow birch? .... 53 Status of Non-native Invasive Species (Questions 12a and 12b) .............................................. 64 Question 12a: To what extent is Forest Plan implementation contributing or responding to non-native invasive plant species? ............................................................................................ 64 Question 12b: To what extent is Forest Plan implementation contributing or responding to non-native invasive animal species? ......................................................................................... 73 Question 13: What amount of road routes and recreation trails are designated open for OHV riding and provide connections to other public trails? .............................................................. 78 Question 14: Is Forest Plan implementation consistent with the Recreational Opportunity Spectrum Objectives and Desired Conditions? ......................................................................... 81 Question 15: Monitor implementation of the Forest Plan with respect to tribal treaty rights applicable on the Ottawa with respect to the tribal MOU. ........................................................ 84 Question 16: Is wilderness management contributing to improvement or preservation of wilderness character and values? .............................................................................................. 88 Question 17: To what extent is Wild and Scenic River (WSR) management contributing to the protection and enhancement of the WSR values? ..................................................................... 93 Question 18: To what extent are forest management activities restoring vegetation composition and spatial landscape patterns and moving toward desired conditions at the Forest, management area and other appropriate landscape scales? ........................................ 108 iii 2012‐2016 Monitoring Evaluation Report Question 19: To what extent are old growth forest conditions being classified consistent with management area objectives? .................................................................................................. 115 Question 20: To what extent are permanent upland openings being created and maintained to move towards desired conditions. ........................................................................................... 120 Question 21: To what extent are northern hardwood forest types being managed to work toward the desired mix of even-aged and uneven-aged stands? ............................................. 124 Question 22: To what extent are aspen forest type acres being maintained through regeneration activities to meet Forestwide and management area objectives? ....................... 126 Question 23: To what extent are long-lived conifer forest types being increased or maintained through regeneration activities to meet Forestwide and management area objectives? ......... 130 Question 24: To what extent are short-lived
Recommended publications
  • National Forests in Michigan

    National Forests in Michigan

    OriqiMI from Digitized by Go gle UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN NATIONAL FORESTS IN MICHIGAN UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST SERVICE NORTH CENTRAL REGION • MILWAUKEE, WIS. ON THE COVER. —Great Conglomerate Falls on the Black River. p-3e«M ERRATA Page Line 5 3 97,000,000 should be 45,000,000. 7 4 Porcupine should not be listed vvilh fur bearers. 17 7 Si.o'jld read "the red pine by its ClUoLC"G Cf t»Vj". 44 2-3 Should read "4 rniies east of Munising". UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1941 sEr^ •*«$• . AU TRAIN FALLS ON THE HIAWATHA NATIONAL FOREST. Drama of Michigan Forests DRAMA of the forests of Michigan has been written in several acts THEeach with its colorful pageantry. The action has concerned the magni ficent woodlands of the redman, the rapid depletion of those forests in the last century, and their slow but sure rebuilding in the present. The elusive "northwest passage" to China, Indian furs and Indian souls, iron and land and copper brought the white men to Michigan. In 1621, only 1 year after the Pilgrims landed at Plymouth Rock, young Etienne Brule, protege of Champlain, reached Lake Superior and was disappointed to find its waters fresh. Thirteen years later, Jean Nicolet, another protege of the French governor of Canada, entered the unknown Lake Michigan through the Straits of Mackinac. Though he never found the longed-for route to the Orient, Nicolet did initiate the French fur trade with the Indians in this territory. Heroic followers of Brule and Nicolet were the Jesuit fathers Jogues and Raymbault, who preached to the Ojibwas in 1641 at Sault Ste.
  • Forestwide Designated Motorized Use Project Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact

    Forestwide Designated Motorized Use Project Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact

    United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Forestwide Designated Motorized Use Project Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact Ottawa National Forest Bergland, Bessemer, Iron River, Kenton, Ontonagon and Watersmeet Ranger Districts Baraga, Gogebic, Houghton, Iron, and Ontonagon Counties, Michigan MAY 2017 Bergland, Bessemer, Iron River, Kenton, Ontonagon and Watersmeet Ranger Districts, Ottawa National Forest For More Information Contact: Susanne Adams, District Ranger/Team Leader 1209 Rockland Road, Ontonagon, Michigan 49953 Phone: 906-884-2085 x14 Email: [email protected] Marlanea French-Pombier, Forest Planner Phone: 906-932-1330, x303 Email: [email protected] This Environmental Assessment and associated documents are also located at the following website: http://www.fs.usda.gov/projects/ottawa/landmanagement/projects (see the Forestwide Designated Motorized Use Project link within the “Under Analysis” section). *Photo credit (front cover): Photo taken by Ian Shackleford, Botanist, Ottawa National Forest. The picture was taken on Forest Road 4500, Watersmeet Ranger District, which is currently open to highway vehicles, and is proposed to be open to all motorized vehicles. In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs).
  • United States Department of the Interior

    United States Department of the Interior

    United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE East Lansing Field Office (ES) 2651 Coolidge Road, Suite 101 IN REPLY REFER TO: East Lansing, Michigan 48823-6316 May 1, 2015 Leslie Auriermno, Forest Supervisor Huron-Manistee National Forests 1755 South Mitchell St. Cadillac, MI 49601-8533 Re: Fonnal Section 7 Consultation on the Huron-Manistee National Forests' Ongoing and Planned Actions- Log# 1O-R3-ELF0-03 Dear Ms. Amiemmo: This letter transmits the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's Biological Opinion for the Huron­ Manistee National Forests' (HMNF) ongoing and planned actions in accordance with Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S .C. 1531 et seq.). The HMNF detennined that the proposed actions were "Likely to Adversely Affect" the norihern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis). We base the enclosed Opinion on information provided in several documents, including your northern long-eared project matrix and Biological Assessment, the Programmatic Biological Assessment and Opinion for the HMNF's Land and Resource Management Plan, and our April 1, 2015, Conference Opinion. Other sources ofinfonnation include previous telephone conversations, e-mails and meetings. A complete administrative record of this consultation is on file at our East Lansing Field Office. After reviewing the current status of northern long-eared bat, the environmental baseline for the action area, the effects of the proposed action, and the cumulative effects, it is our biological opinion that the action, as proposed, is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of northern long-eared bat With respect to ESA compliance, all aspects of the project description are binding.
  • Sylvania Wilderness for More Information, Contacatn: DERSON LAKE BIG DONAHUE LAKE Florence to Big Bateau Lake 34 Rods 36

    Sylvania Wilderness for More Information, Contacatn: DERSON LAKE BIG DONAHUE LAKE Florence to Big Bateau Lake 34 Rods 36

    2 DAMON LAKE Watersmeet 3.5 miles 26 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 Sylvania 30 29 PIT LAKE Wilderness CUTTERS POND 28 ROSS LAKE ALBINO LAKE and Recreation RAVEN LAKE PORCUPINE LAKE HATTIE LAKE 35 Area BIG AFRICAN LAKE 36 31 32 RECORD LAKE 33 PARTRIDGE LAKE GOG-535 MAUD LAKE 34 DOYLE LAKE 35 36 31 32 33 BIG AFRICAN LAKE SNAP JACK LAKE CLEAR LAKE Sylvania RICKLES LAKE Entrance TRAIL LAKE Station HELEN LAKE Clark Lake Campground KERR LAKE WOLF DEER-1 LONG LAKE COYOTE LITTLE TRAIL LAKE 2 WEST BEAR LAKE DEER-2 1 EAST BEAR LAKE PILOT LAKE 6 5 KATHERINE LAKE PORCUPINE-2 4 HIGH LAKE 3 2 HILLTOP LAKE PORCUPINE-1 RACCOON 1 JENNINGS LAKE 6 5 GOG-535 4 BOBCAT LYNX-2 THOUSAND ISLAND LAKE ASH-1 LYNX-1 ASH-2 JAY LAKE ERMINE-2 ERMINE-1 BALSAM-1 COREY LAKE 6320 LILUIS LAKE BALSAM-2 MINK-1 MOUNTAIN LAKE CHICKADEE LAKE LOUISE LAKE MINK-2 BEAR-2 CEDAR-2 PINE-1 CHIPMUNK BEAR-1 11 CEDAR-1 BEAVER-1 12 PINE-2 7 SQUIRREL-2 8 CLARK LAKE 9 DOROTHY LAKEELSIE LAKE 10 SQUIRREL-1 BEAVER-2 LITTLE DUCK LAKE BIRCH 12 CROOKED LAKE FOX-1 7 MAPLE-2 11 8 MAPLE-1 9 FOX-2 MULE LAKE SISKIN LAKE BADGER-1 BADGER-2 DAISY LAKE FISHER-1 9 FISHER-2 3 5 - G HAY LAKE O DEVILS HEAD LAKE G PERCH-1 GERMAIN LAKE TRAPPER LAKE 14 13 PERCH-2 INDIAN LAKE 18 17 16 15 14 MALLARD-1 13 18 17 16 DREAM LAKE MALLARD-2 WHITEFISH LAKE EAST BAY LAKE PIKE-1 LOON LAKE PIKE-2 OSPREY-2 DUCK LAKE 23 BASS LOON 24 OSPREY-1 19 LOIS LAKE 20 DEER ISLAND LAKE 6320 21 22 EAGLE-2 23 24 19 20 Mic EAGLE-1 21 higan MOSS LAKE MAMIE LAKE Wilderness Campsites Wisc FISHER LAKE onsin Boat Landing JOHNSTON SPRINGS Portage Lengths
  • 2013 Ontonagon, Presque Isle, Black, and Montreal River Watersheds

    2013 Ontonagon, Presque Isle, Black, and Montreal River Watersheds

    MI/DEQ/WRD-13/014MI/DEQ/WRD-15/024 MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY WATER RESOURCES DIVISION JULY 2015 STAFF REPORT A BIOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THE ONTONAGON, PRESQUE ISLE, BLACK, AND MONTREAL RIVERS WATERSHEDS AND OTHER SELECTED WATERSHEDS IN GOGEBIC, HOUGHTON, IRON, AND ONTONAGON COUNTIES, MICHIGAN JULY-AUGUST 2013 INTRODUCTION Staff of the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ), Surface Water Assessment Section (SWAS), conducted biological, chemical, and physical habitat surveys during the summer of 2013 throughout the Ontonagon (Hydrologic Unit Code [HUC] 04020102), Presque Isle (HUC 04020101), Black (HUC 04020101), and Montreal (HUC 04010302) (OPBM) Rivers watersheds. Additionally, some streams located in smaller western Lake Superior coastal watersheds were surveyed (Figure 1). The goals of this monitoring were to: (1) assess the current status and condition of individual water bodies and determine whether Michigan Water Quality Standards (WQS) are being met; (2) evaluate biological integrity temporal trends; (3) satisfy monitoring requests submitted by external and internal customers; and (4) identify potential nonpoint source (NPS) pollution problems. These surveys qualitatively characterized the biotic integrity of macroinvertebrate communities with respect to existing habitat conditions at randomly selected sites throughout the OPBM watersheds region. The results of the surveys are used by the SWAS’s Status and Trends Program to estimate the amount of these watersheds that is supporting the other indigenous aquatic life and wildlife designated use component of R 323.1100(1)(e) of the Part 4 rules, WQS, promulgated under Part 31, Water Resources Protection, of the Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act, 1994 PA 451, as amended. BACKGROUND AND HISTORICAL SAMPLING EFFORTS The OPBM watersheds are located in the extreme west end of Michigan’s Upper Peninsula.
  • Geology of the Porcupine Mountains

    Geology of the Porcupine Mountains

    Geology of the Porcupine Mountains Overlying the Porcupine Volcanics is a produced major thrust faults and folding sequence of fluvial (river deposited) of Keweenawan strata. As a result of this The bedrock of the Porcupine sedimentary rock known as the Copper deformation, the Porcupine Mountains Mountains records part of the evolution Harbor Conglomerate. The deposition of anticline, Presque Isle syncline and Iron of the North American continent during these rocks marks the end of rift River syncline–all features that can be the late Precambrian Era. Rock strata extension and the beginning of observed in the park–were formed. within the mountains belong to the sedimentation in the post-rift basin. The Keweenawan rocks are notable for Keweenawan Supergroup, a thick Conglomerates of the Copper Harbor significant copper deposits. Secondary sequence of volcanic and sedimentary formation contain clasts derived primarily mineralization by copper, epidote, quartz, rocks (exceeding 25 km) deposited about from Keweenawan Supergroup volcanic prehnite, and pumpellyite fill voids, 1.1 billion years ago, during and shortly rocks. fissures and vesicles in basalt flows. after an episode of continental rifting. A series of thin basalt flows marks a Utilization of the region's copper deposits This Midcontinental rift system brief return to volcanism during Copper was begun by prehistoric peoples active represents the early stages of continental Harbor deposition. These flows, called in the region long before European breakup and is a major geologic feature the Lakeshore Traps, form one of the arrival. Historic extraction of the copper of the North Ameerican Continent. park’s most prominent geologic features; resource began in 1845, when the region Outside of the Lake Superior region, the extended basalt-capped escarpment witnessed the nation's first mining rush.
  • PDF for Print

    PDF for Print

    UPPER GREAT LAKES Physical Description species including the fisher, black bear, snowshoeing, nature study and soli- The Upper Great Lakes Keystone Forest loon, osprey and brook trout. There is tude. is part of the larger Western Great also potential habitat for the recovery Lakes forest ecoregion. Even today, the of extirpated or rare species such as the Threats remote Upper Peninsula of Michigan, cougar, lynx, marten and wolverine. As the U.S. Forest Service has run out northern Wisconsin and Minnesota har- The most dominant feature of the of areas to log in other regions, the bor some of the most expansive forests region is water, with hundreds of miles rate of cutting has skyrocketed in the remaining in the lower 48 states. A mix of shoreline on Lake Superior; tens of national forests of the Great Lakes. The of spruce-fir coniferous forest and a thousands of lakes, ponds and wet- state forests in the region have long hardwood mix of aspen, paper birch, lands; and thousands of miles of rivers been grossly mismanaged and continue beech and maple dominate this key- and streams. This keystone forest is to suffer major ecological damage stone forest. This vast forest is home to well-known for its diverse backcountry from logging, road-building and inten- most of the wolves and almost one- recreational opportunities, including sive motorized recreation. A significant half of the bald eagles in the lower 48 hiking, camping, canoeing, boating, threat on both federal and state lands states, as well as other sensitive wildlife fishing, hunting, cross-country skiing, is widespread clearcutting to benefit commonly hunted wildlife, such as deer and ruffed grouse, to the detri- ment of many sensitive native species.
  • Crystal Falls

    Crystal Falls

    Welcome to Iron County, Michigan Plan your next vacation and getaways to Iron County, Michigan. Discover, explore and enjoy the natural wonders that Iron County offers. Open to all, lush forests and sparkling lakes dominate the land- scape here. Far away from city life that you’ll think you’ve not only crossed a different time zone, but into a different era. Folks are downright friendly and anxious to get to know you. Life is laidback . but not where you can’t enjoy power boating, zip- ping across the lake on your personal watercraft and ATVing the many trails. WELCOME Golfing continues to grow in popularity, whether for a 9- or 18-hole round or with the new pursuit, disc golf. The silent sports are very much in vogue. In addition to road biking and mountain biking, those geared toward fat bikes are pushing the pedals in Iron County. Color- ful kayaks, SUPs and canoes dot the lakes and rivers. And dare we say it -- drones are becoming the next outdoor sport with quadcopters and the like recording the beauty from up above. Camping is big – especially watching the sparks from the campfire mingle with the stars -- but our motels and cabins welcome their share of guests anxious for a comfy bed and maybe a Jacuzzi. There’s more to Iron County than natural beauty. Our restaurants and taverns are pretty special places to visit for a meal and shooting the breeze over a craft beer. Our communities invite all to celebrate with them on special occasions. Summer brings exciting rodeo action when the UP Pro Rodeo pays a visit to Iron River.
  • Yukon Butterflies a Guide to Yukon Butterflies

    Yukon Butterflies a Guide to Yukon Butterflies

    Wildlife Viewing Yukon butterflies A guide to Yukon butterflies Where to find them Currently, about 91 species of butterflies, representing five families, are known from Yukon, but scientists expect to discover more. Finding butterflies in Yukon is easy. Just look in any natural, open area on a warm, sunny day. Two excellent butterfly viewing spots are Keno Hill and the Blackstone Uplands. Pick up Yukon’s Wildlife Viewing Guide to find these and other wildlife viewing hotspots. Visitors follow an old mining road Viewing tips to explore the alpine on top of Keno Hill. This booklet will help you view and identify some of the more common butterflies, and a few distinctive but less common species. Additional species are mentioned but not illustrated. In some cases, © Government of Yukon 2019 you will need a detailed book, such as , ISBN 978-1-55362-862-2 The Butterflies of Canada to identify the exact species that you have seen. All photos by Crispin Guppy except as follows: In the Alpine (p.ii) Some Yukon butterflies, by Ryan Agar; Cerisy’s Sphynx moth (p.2) by Sara Nielsen; Anicia such as the large swallowtails, Checkerspot (p.2) by Bruce Bennett; swallowtails (p.3) by Bruce are bright to advertise their Bennett; Freija Fritillary (p.12) by Sonja Stange; Gallium Sphinx presence to mates. Others are caterpillar (p.19) by William Kleeden (www.yukonexplorer.com); coloured in dull earth tones Butterfly hike at Keno (p.21) by Peter Long; Alpine Interpretive that allow them to hide from bird Centre (p.22) by Bruce Bennett.
  • LAND by the LAKES Nearshore Terrestrial Ecosystems

    LAND by the LAKES Nearshore Terrestrial Ecosystems

    State of the Lakes Ecosystem Conference 1996 Background Paper THE LAND BY THE LAKES Nearshore Terrestrial Ecosystems Ron Reid Bobolink Enterprises Washago, Ontario Canada Karen Holland U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Chicago, Illinois U.S.A. October 1997 ISBN 0-662-26033-3 EPA 905-R-97-015c Cat. No. En40-11/35-3-1997E ii The Land by the Lakes—SOLEC 96 Table of Contents Acknowledgments ................................................................. v 1. Overview of the Land by the Lakes .................................................. 1 1.1 Introduction ............................................................ 1 1.2 Report Structure ......................................................... 2 1.3 Conclusion ............................................................. 2 1.4 Key Observations ........................................................ 3 1.5 Moving Forward ......................................................... 5 2. The Ecoregional Context .......................................................... 6 2.1 Why Consider Ecoregional Context? .......................................... 6 2.2 Classification Systems for Great Lakes Ecoregions ............................... 7 3. Where Land and Water Meet ....................................................... 9 3.1 Changing Shapes and Structures ............................................. 9 3.1.1 Crustal Tilting ................................................. 10 3.1.2 Climate ....................................................... 10 3.1.3 Erosion ......................................................
  • Download the Iron County Michigan Visitors Guide

    Download the Iron County Michigan Visitors Guide

    1 2019 Visitor Guide 2 2019 Visitor Guide Iron.org • (888) TRY-IRON 3 WELCOME EVENTS Iron County, Michigan Welcomes You ron County is one of the Upper Peninsula’s up-and-coming But we don’t just know how to travel destinations. Whether you’re looking for an affordable have fun, our community also know how Ifamily adventure, or you’re in search of that wall-mount-worthy to eat. It doesn’t matter what side of the county you find northern pike, you’re sure to make life-long memories here! yourself, there are great watering holes and restaurants - just ask the locals! From award-winning pasties and pizza, to upscale southern Camp, hunt, fish and hike in our 400,000 acres of public forestland BBQ and fabulous Friday night fish fries, you’re guaranteed a in the Ottawa National Forest. Catch your limit of a multitude of memorable meal no matter where you go. fish species in our more than 200 lakes, and 300 miles of navigable rivers, five of which are designated Blue Ribbon Trout Streams. Here Get more insider’s tips on the best restaurants, maps and waterfall you’re never fighting through crowds, stuck in traffic or waiting for tours, tickets for local events, and more at the Iron County Visitors hours in endless lines. Wherever you find yourself in Iron County, Center. Make Iron Count your hub for day trips to the other amazing our Northwoods clear waters and quiet retreats are never more than sites around the Western U.P. We’ll play the concierge and help you a few steps away.
  • Geology of Michigan and the Great Lakes

    Geology of Michigan and the Great Lakes

    35133_Geo_Michigan_Cover.qxd 11/13/07 10:26 AM Page 1 “The Geology of Michigan and the Great Lakes” is written to augment any introductory earth science, environmental geology, geologic, or geographic course offering, and is designed to introduce students in Michigan and the Great Lakes to important regional geologic concepts and events. Although Michigan’s geologic past spans the Precambrian through the Holocene, much of the rock record, Pennsylvanian through Pliocene, is miss- ing. Glacial events during the Pleistocene removed these rocks. However, these same glacial events left behind a rich legacy of surficial deposits, various landscape features, lakes, and rivers. Michigan is one of the most scenic states in the nation, providing numerous recre- ational opportunities to inhabitants and visitors alike. Geology of the region has also played an important, and often controlling, role in the pattern of settlement and ongoing economic development of the state. Vital resources such as iron ore, copper, gypsum, salt, oil, and gas have greatly contributed to Michigan’s growth and industrial might. Ample supplies of high-quality water support a vibrant population and strong industrial base throughout the Great Lakes region. These water supplies are now becoming increasingly important in light of modern economic growth and population demands. This text introduces the student to the geology of Michigan and the Great Lakes region. It begins with the Precambrian basement terrains as they relate to plate tectonic events. It describes Paleozoic clastic and carbonate rocks, restricted basin salts, and Niagaran pinnacle reefs. Quaternary glacial events and the development of today’s modern landscapes are also discussed.