DOCSLIB.ORG

Carbon County Natural Resource Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Carbon County Natural Resource Management Plan APRIL 13, 2021 Carbon County Natural Resource Management Plan Natural Resource Management Plan Y2 Consultants, LLC & Falen Law Offices (Intentionally Left Blank) Natural Resource Management Plan Y2 Consultants, LLC & Falen Law Offices CONTENTS ACRONYMS .......................................................................................................................... III LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................. VII LIST OF TABLES ..................................................................................................................... IX CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 10 1.1 PURPOSE................................................................................................................................. 10 1.2 STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK ..................................................................... 11 1.3 CARBON COUNTY NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN PROCESS ............................................... 15 1.4 CREDIBLE DATA ........................................................................................................................ 19 CHAPTER 2: CARBON COUNTY CUSTOM AND CULTURE ........................................................ 21 2.1 COUNTY INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW ...................................................................................... 21 2.2 CULTURAL/HERITAGE/PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES .................................................................... 26 CHAPTER 3: LAND USE ......................................................................................................... 33 3.1 LAND USE ............................................................................................................................... 33 3.2 TRANSPORTATION AND LAND ACCESS ........................................................................................... 37 3.3 SPECIAL DESIGNATION AND MANAGEMENT AREAS .......................................................................... 44 3.4 WILDFIRE MANAGEMENT AND COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PLANNING ..................................................... 62 3.5 FOREST MANAGEMENT .............................................................................................................. 67 3.6 LAND EXCHANGES ..................................................................................................................... 69 CHAPTER 4: GEOLOGY, SOILS, MINING, ENERGY, AND AIR QUALITY RESOURCES .................. 73 4.1 OVERVIEW .............................................................................................................................. 73 4.2 GEOLOGY ................................................................................................................................ 75 4.3 SOILS...................................................................................................................................... 77 4.4 MINING & MINERAL RESOURCES ................................................................................................. 81 4.5 ENERGY RESOURCES .................................................................................................................. 84 4.6 AIR QUALITY .......................................................................................................................... 102 4.7 CLIMATE CHANGE ................................................................................................................... 104 CHAPTER 5: WATER RESOURCES ........................................................................................ 106 5.1 OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................ 106 5.2 WATER USE ........................................................................................................................... 109 5.3 WATER QUALITY .................................................................................................................... 122 5.4 WATER INFLUENCE AREAS ........................................................................................................ 129 CHAPTER 6: WILDLIFE RESOURCES ..................................................................................... 132 6.1 WILDLIFE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AGENCIES ............................................................................ 132 6.2 WILDLIFE .............................................................................................................................. 134 i | P a g e Natural Resource Management Plan 6.3 THREATENED, ENDANGERED, AND SENSITIVE SPECIES .................................................................... 150 6.4 FISHERIES .............................................................................................................................. 156 6.5 PREDATOR MANAGEMENT ....................................................................................................... 160 CHAPTER 7: WILD HORSES AND ESTRAY LIVESTOCK ........................................................... 162 7.1 WILD HORSES AND ESTRAY LIVESTOCK ........................................................................................ 162 CHAPTER 8: SOCIOECONOMICS AND SOCIETY .................................................................... 170 8.1 TOURISM AND RECREATION ON PUBLIC LANDS ............................................................................. 170 8.2 LAW ENFORCEMENT AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE ......................................................................... 173 8.3 ECONOMIC AND SOCIOECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS ..................................................................... 178 CHAPTER 9: AGRICULTURE ................................................................................................. 190 9.1 AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 190 9.2 LIVESTOCK AND GRAZING ......................................................................................................... 193 9.3 NOXIOUS WEEDS/INVASIVE SPECIES/PESTS ................................................................................. 204 REFERENCES ...................................................................................................................... 209 APPENDICES ...................................................................................................................... 222 APPENDIX A: WEBSITE LINKS IN DOCUMENT ...................................................................................... 222 APPENDIX B: STEERING COMMITTEE ................................................................................................ 226 APPENDIX C: PUBLIC COMMENTS RECEIVED ...................................................................................... 227 ii | P a g e Natural Resource Management Plan ACRONYMS ACEC - Areas of Critical Environmental Concern ACHP - Advisory Council on Historic Preservation AML - Appropriate Management Level APHIS - Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service ARPA - Archeological Resources Protection Act AUM - Animal Unit Month BGEPA - Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act BJFTA - Bankhead-Jones Farm Tenant Act BLM - Bureau of Land Management BMP - Best Management Practice BOCC - Board of County Commissioners BOR - Bureau of Reclamation CAP-SSE - Community Assistance Program – State Support Services CCA - Candidate Conservation Agreements CCSM - Chokecherry Sierra Madre CCWP - Carbon County Weed and Pest CDNST - Continental Divide Trail National Scenic Trail CE/CX - Categorical Exemption/ Categorical Exclusion CEQ - Council on Environmental Quality CWA - Clean Water Act CWPP - Community Wildfire Protection Plan EA - Environmental Assessment EIS - Environmental Impact Statement EPA - Environmental Protection Agency ERMA - Extensive Recreation Management Area ESA - 1973 Endangered Species Act ESD - Ecological Site Descriptions FAST - Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act FDQA - Federal Data Quality Act FEMA - Federal Emergency Management Agency iii | P a g e Natural Resource Management Plan FERC - Federal Energy Regulatory Commission FHWA - Federal Highway Administration FLAP - Federal Lands Access Program FLPMA - Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 FLTP - Federal Lands Transportation Program GGRB - Greater Green River Basin GHMA - General Habitat Management Area GHG - Greenhouse Gas GLO - General Lands Office GPC - Groundwater Pollution Control HMAs - Herd Management Areas IRA - Inventoried Roadless Area LSRCD - Little Snake River Conservation District LSRCD NRMP - Little Snake River Conservation District Land, Water, and Natural Resource Management Plan LUP - Land Use Plan LWC - Lands with Wilderness Characteristics LWCF - Land and Water Conservation Fund Act of 1964 MBCD - Medicine Bow Conservation District MBCD LRNRMP - Medicine Bow Conservation District Long Range and Natural Resource Management Plan MBRNF - Medicine Bow-Routt National Forest MBTA - Migratory Bird Treaty Act MOA - Memorandum of Agreement MOU - Memorandum of Understanding MUSY - 1960 Multiple Use Sustained Yield Act NAAQS - National Ambient Air Quality Standards NEPA - 1973 National Environmental Policy Act NFHL - National Flood Hazard Layer NFIP - National Flood Insurance Program NFMA - 1976 National Forest Management Act NHPA - National Historic Preservation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Seminoe Reservoir Inflow
    Annual Operating Plans Table of Contents Preface ..................................................................................... 5 Introduction ............................................................................. 5 System Planning and Control ................................................ 7 System Operations Water Year 2018 ................................... 10 Seminoe Reservoir Inflow ........................................................................... 10 Seminoe Reservoir Storage and Releases .............................................. 10 Kortes Reservoir Storage and Releases .................................................. 12 Gains to the North Platte River from Kortes Dam to Pathfinder Dam .................................................................................................... 13 Pathfinder Reservoir Storage and Releases ........................................... 14 Alcova and Gray Reef Reservoirs Storage and Releases .................... 17 Gains to the North Platte River from Alcova Dam to Glendo Reservoir ........................................................................................... 18 Glendo Reservoir Storage and Releases ................................................. 18 Gains to the North Platte River from Glendo Dam to Guernsey Reservoir ........................................................................................... 21 Guernsey Reservoir Storage and Releases ............................................ 22 Precipitation Summary for Water Year 2018 ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 - JCR Evaluation Form
    2017 - JCR Evaluation Form SPECIES: Moose PERIOD: 6/1/2017 - 5/31/2018 HERD: MO545 - SNOWY RANGE HUNT AREAS: 38, 41 PREPARED BY: WILL SCHULTZ 2012 - 2016 Average 2017 2018 Proposed Trend Count: 40 169 180 Harvest: 46 42 42 Hunters: 52 43 43 Hunter Success: 88% 98% 98 % Active Licenses: 52 43 43 Active License Success 88% 98% 98 % Recreation Days: 426 390 390 Days Per Animal: 9.3 9.3 9.3 Males per 100 Females: 119 93 Juveniles per 100 Females 50 45 Trend Based Objective (± 20%) 75 (60 - 90) Management Strategy: Special Percent population is above (+) or (-) objective: 125% Number of years population has been + or - objective in recent trend: 2 Proposed harvest rates (percent of pre-season estimate for each sex/age group): JCR Year Proposed Females ≥ 1 year old: NA% NA% Males ≥ 1 year old: NA% NA% Juveniles (< 1 year old): NA% NA% Total: NA% NA% Proposed change in post-season population: NA% NA% 199 200 201 2012 - 2017 Postseason Classification Summary for Moose Herd MO545 - SNOWY RANGE MALES FEMALES JUVENILES Males to 100 Females Young to Tot Cls Conf 100 Conf 100 Year Post Pop Ylg Adult Total % Total % Total % Cls Obj Ylng Adult Total Int Fem Int Adult 2012 0 4 14 18 44% 14 34% 9 22% 41 0 29 100 129 ± 0 64 ± 0 28 2013 0 5 27 32 42% 27 35% 18 23% 77 0 19 100 119 ± 0 67 ± 0 31 2014 266 2 20 22 42% 22 42% 8 15% 52 254 9 91 100 ± 35 36 ± 17 18 2015 0 0 17 17 57% 8 27% 5 17% 30 246 0 212 212 ± 0 62 ± 0 20 2016 0 9 77 86 44% 76 39% 33 17% 195 0 12 101 113 ± 0 43 ± 0 20 2017 0 17 49 66 39% 71 42% 32 19% 169 0 24 69 93 ± 0 45 ± 0 23 202 2018 HUNTING SEASON RECOMMENDATIONS SNOWY RANGE MOOSE (MO545) Season Dates Hunt Area Type Opens Closes Quota License Limitations 38, 41 1 Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • Wyoming SCORP Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2014 - 2019 Wyoming Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (SCORP) 2014-2019
    Wyoming SCORP Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2014 - 2019 Wyoming Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (SCORP) 2014-2019 The 2014-2019 Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan was prepared by the Planning and Grants Section within Wyoming’s Department of State Parks and Cultural Resources, Division of State Parks, Historic Sites and Trails. Updates to the trails chapter were completed by the Trails Section within the Division of State Parks, Historic Sites and Trails. The Wyoming Game and Fish Department provided the wetlands chapter. The preparation of this plan was financed through a planning grant from the National Park Service, Department of the Interior, under the provision of the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act of 1965 (Public Law 88-578, as amended). For additional information contact: Wyoming Department of State Parks and Cultural Resources Division of State Parks, Historic Sites and Trails 2301 Central Avenue, Barrett Building Cheyenne, WY 82002 (307) 777-6323 Wyoming SCORP document available online at www.wyoparks.state.wy.us. Table of Contents Chapter 1 • Introduction ................................................................................................ 3 Chapter 2 • Description of State ............................................................................. 11 Chapter 3 • Recreation Facilities and Needs .................................................... 29 Chapter 4 • Trails ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • VGP) Version 2/5/2009
    Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) VESSEL GENERAL PERMIT FOR DISCHARGES INCIDENTAL TO THE NORMAL OPERATION OF VESSELS (VGP) AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act (CWA), as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), any owner or operator of a vessel being operated in a capacity as a means of transportation who: • Is eligible for permit coverage under Part 1.2; • If required by Part 1.5.1, submits a complete and accurate Notice of Intent (NOI) is authorized to discharge in accordance with the requirements of this permit. General effluent limits for all eligible vessels are given in Part 2. Further vessel class or type specific requirements are given in Part 5 for select vessels and apply in addition to any general effluent limits in Part 2. Specific requirements that apply in individual States and Indian Country Lands are found in Part 6. Definitions of permit-specific terms used in this permit are provided in Appendix A. This permit becomes effective on December 19, 2008 for all jurisdictions except Alaska and Hawaii. This permit and the authorization to discharge expire at midnight, December 19, 2013 i Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 William K. Honker, Acting Director Robert W. Varney, Water Quality Protection Division, EPA Region Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1 6 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, Barbara A.
    [Show full text]
  • C:\A Projects\AAA IBLA Decs\115IBLA\L004-007.Wpd
    RAYMUNDO J. CHICO IBLA 87-681 Decided May 30, 1990 Appeal from a decision of the Wyoming State Office, Bureau of Land Management, declaring mining claims null and void ab initio. W MC 230232 et al. Reversed and remanded. 1. Boundaries--Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976: Wilderness--Mining Claims: Lands Subject to--Mining Claims: Location--Mining Claims: Lode Claims--Mining Claims: Withdrawn Land--Wilderness Act--Withdrawals and Reservations: Effect of Where BLM declares mining claims null and void ab initio due to location on unavailable wilderness land, but the mining claimant offers a map to show that some of the mining claims lie entirely on land open to mineral entry and other claims only partially overlap wilderness land, the decision will be reversed and remanded to BLM to verify the location of the overlapping claims. APPEARANCES: Raymundo J. Chico, pro se, and Joy K. Moseley, Senior Landman, American Copper & Nickel Company, Inc., Wheat Ridge, Colorado, for appellant. OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE BYRNES Raymundo J. Chico has appealed from a decision of the Wyoming State Office, Bureau of Land Management (BLM), dated June 26, 1987, declaring unpatented lode mining claims (see Appendix A) null and void ab initio. According to the BLM decision, the claims were located on wilderness area lands, segregated from mineral entry on December 31, 1983. The claims the BLM decision listed 1/ were located on May 22 and 25, 1986, in secs. 13, 14, 15, 16, 21, and 22 in T. 14 N., R. 80 W., sixth _____________________________________ 1/ The BLM decision states that "63 unpatented lode mining claims (See enclosure 1) * * * are hereby declared null and void ab initio." However, only the 45 claims enumerated at Appendix A of this decision were listed on "enclosure 1" of the BLM decision.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Colorado's Wilderness Areas
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 12-2011 Assessment of Colorado’s Wilderness Areas: Manager Perceptions and Remoteness Modeling Gary D. Vaughn Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the Life Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Vaughn, Gary D., "Assessment of Colorado’s Wilderness Areas: Manager Perceptions and Remoteness Modeling" (2011). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 1096. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/1096 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ASSESSMENT OF COLORADO’S WILDERNESS AREAS: MANAGER PERCEPTIONS AND REMOTENESS MODELING by Gary D. Vaughn A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Recreation Resource Management Approved: ________________________ ________________________ Dr. Christopher A. Monz Dr. Mark W. Brunson Major Professor Committee Member ________________________ ________________________ Dr. Christopher M. U. Neale Dr. Mark R. McLellan Committee Member Vice President for Research and Dean of the School of Graduate Studies UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 2011 ii Copyright © Gary D. Vaughn 2011 All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Assessment of Colorado’s Wilderness Areas: Manager Perceptions and Remoteness Modeling by Gary D. Vaughn, Master of Science Utah State University, 2011 Major Professor: Dr. Christopher Monz Department: Environment & Society This study assessed visitor use levels and resource and social conditions in wilderness areas across the State of Colorado using existing and collected spatial data.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C - Roadless Areas
    Appendix C - Roadless Areas Purpose The purpose of this appendix is to describe roadless areas and the analysis factors used in evaluating individual roadless areas on the Routt National Forest. It includes a description of the physical and biological features, primitive recreation and education opportunities, resources, and present management situation for each area. Background Roadless Area Review and Evaluation In 1970, the Forest Service studied all administratively designated primitive areas and inventoried and reviewed all roadless areas in the National Forest System greater than 5,000 acres. This study was known as the Roadless Area Review and Evaluation (RARE). RARE was halted in 1972 due to legal challenge. RARE identified 711,043 acres of roadless area on the Routt National Forest. In 1977, the Forest Service began another nation-wide Roadless Area Review and Evaluation (RARE II) to identify roadless and undeveloped areas within the National Forest System that were suitable for inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System. Twenty nine areas, totalling 566,756 acres, were inventoried on the Routt National Forest (including the Middle Park Ranger District of the Arapaho-Roosevelt National Forest). As a result of RARE II, four areas on the forest - Williams Fork, St. Louis Peak, Service Creek, and Davis Peak - were administratively designated as Further Planning Areas (FPA). This further planning area designation meant that more information was needed before the Forest Service would recommend any of these areas to Congress for wilderness designation. In January 1979, the Forest Service issued nationally a Final Environmental Impact Statement documenting a review of 62 million acres of roadless and undeveloped areas within the 191-million-acre National Forest System.
    [Show full text]
  • Wyoming & Colorado Weather Modification Program
    WYOMING & COLORADO WEATHER MODIFICATION PROGRAM WINTER AERIAL CLOUD SEEDING OPERATIONS Final Operations Report 2018-2019 Winter Season T 701.235.5500 • F 701.235.9717 • 3802 20th Street N • Fargo, ND • USA weathermodification.com Airborne Cloud Seeding Operations 2018-2019 Winter Operations Annual Report For the Sierra Madre and Medicine Bow Mountain Ranges, Wyoming Never Summer Mountain Range, Colorado Prepared By 3802 20th Street North Fargo, ND USA Phone 701.235.5500 Fax 701.235.9717 Submitted To Wyoming Water Development Office 6920 Yellowtail Road Cheyenne, WY 82002 OCTOBER 2019 2018-2019 WINTER OPERATIONS ANNUAL REPORT Wyoming & Colorado Aerial Weather Modification Program EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report summarizes the activities conducted by Weather Modification LLC, dba Weather Modification International (WMI) during the 2018-2019 winter operational season from November 15, 20181 – March 31, 2019. The program, facilitated by the Wyoming Water Development Office (WWDO), utilized a WMI seeding aircraft to increase snowfall in the mountains in the Upper North Platte River and Colorado River Basins for additional water runoff. This was the 1st season Weather Modification International has provided pilot and aircraft services to conduct aerial cloud seeding operations for the State of Wyoming and the State of Colorado. Primary funding for the project was provided by the Wyoming Water Development Commission (WWDC), with funds appropriated by the Wyoming Legislature, in the amount of $425,273. Additional funding was provided by the Board of Public Utilities (BOPU) of the City of Cheyenne, in the amount of $45,000. The Jackson County Water Conservancy District (JCWCD) provided an additional $29,764 for operations conducted within the State of Colorado, primarily through a grant from the Colorado Water Conservation Board (CWCB).
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Small Vessel General Permit
    ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PUBLIC NOTICE The United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 W. Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois has requested a determination from the Illinois Department of Natural Resources if their Vessel General Permit (VGP) and Small Vessel General Permit (sVGP) are consistent with the enforceable policies of the Illinois Coastal Management Program (ICMP). VGP regulates discharges incidental to the normal operation of commercial vessels and non-recreational vessels greater than or equal to 79 ft. in length. sVGP regulates discharges incidental to the normal operation of commercial vessels and non- recreational vessels less than 79 ft. in length. VGP and sVGP can be viewed in their entirety at the ICMP web site http://www.dnr.illinois.gov/cmp/Pages/CMPFederalConsistencyRegister.aspx Inquiries concerning this request may be directed to Jim Casey of the Department’s Chicago Office at (312) 793-5947 or [email protected]. You are invited to send written comments regarding this consistency request to the Michael A. Bilandic Building, 160 N. LaSalle Street, Suite S-703, Chicago, Illinois 60601. All comments claiming the proposed actions would not meet federal consistency must cite the state law or laws and how they would be violated. All comments must be received by July 19, 2012. Proposed Small Vessel General Permit (sVGP) United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) SMALL VESSEL GENERAL PERMIT FOR DISCHARGES INCIDENTAL TO THE NORMAL OPERATION OF VESSELS LESS THAN 79 FEET (sVGP) AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act, as amended (33 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of the Interior United States Geological
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MISCELLANEOUS FIELD STUDIES UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MAP MF-1638-A PAMPHLET MINERAL RESOURCE POTENTIAL OF THE SAVAGE RUN WILDERNESS, CARBON AND ALBANY COUNTIES, WYOMING By M. E. McCallum, U.S. Geological Survey and Steven £. Kluender, U.S. Bureau of Mines STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS Under the provisions of the Wilderness Act (Public Law 88-577, September 3, 1964) and related acts, the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Bureau of Mines have been conducting mineral surveys of wilderness and primitive areas. Areas officially designated as "wilderness," "wild," or "canoe" when the act was passed were incorporated into the National Wilderness Preservation System, and some of them are presently being studied. The act provided that areas under consideration for wilderness designation should be studied for suitability for incorporation into the Wilderness System. The mineral surveys constitute one aspect of the suitability studies. The act directs that the results of such surveys are to be made available to the public and be submitted to the President and the Congress. This report discusses the results of a mineral survey of the Savage Run Wilderness in the Medicine Bow National Forest, Carbon and Albany Counties, Wyoming. The area was established as a wilderness by Public Law 95-Z37, February 24, 1978. MINERAL RESOURCE POTENTIAL SUMMARY STATEMENT Although numerous, small gold and copper mining operations were conducted for a number of years around the turn of the century and intermittently thereafter in areas immediately to the east, there is no evidence of any mineral production within the Savage Run Wilderness.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 7 - National Wilderness Areas by State
    Table 7 - National Wilderness Areas by State * Unit is in two or more States ** Acres estimated pending final boundary determination + Special Area that is part of a proclaimed National Forest State National Wilderness Area NFS Other Total Unit Name Acreage Acreage Acreage Alabama Cheaha Wilderness Talladega National Forest 7,400 0 7,400 Dugger Mountain Wilderness** Talladega National Forest 9,048 0 9,048 Sipsey Wilderness William B. Bankhead National Forest 25,770 83 25,853 Alabama Totals 42,218 83 42,301 Alaska Chuck River Wilderness 74,876 520 75,396 Coronation Island Wilderness Tongass National Forest 19,118 0 19,118 Endicott River Wilderness Tongass National Forest 98,396 0 98,396 Karta River Wilderness Tongass National Forest 39,917 7 39,924 Kootznoowoo Wilderness Tongass National Forest 979,079 21,741 1,000,820 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 654 654 Kuiu Wilderness Tongass National Forest 60,183 15 60,198 Maurille Islands Wilderness Tongass National Forest 4,814 0 4,814 Misty Fiords National Monument Wilderness Tongass National Forest 2,144,010 235 2,144,245 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 15 15 Petersburg Creek-Duncan Salt Chuck Wilderness Tongass National Forest 46,758 0 46,758 Pleasant/Lemusurier/Inian Islands Wilderness Tongass National Forest 23,083 41 23,124 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 15 15 Russell Fjord Wilderness Tongass National Forest 348,626 63 348,689 South Baranof Wilderness Tongass National Forest 315,833 0 315,833 South Etolin Wilderness Tongass National Forest 82,593 834 83,427 Refresh Date: 10/14/2017
    [Show full text]
  • North Platte Basin Hydrologic Modeling Report
    U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District In Association with Nebraska Silver Jackets PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT Regulated Flood Frequency Analysis for the North Platte River at North Platte, NE Contract W9128F-13-T-0011 Prepared by Riverside Technology, inc. October 14th, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ 1-1 2 Data Collection .................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Climatology Data ........................................................................................................................ 2-1 2.2 Streamflow Data ........................................................................................................................ 2-1 2.3 Diversion Data ............................................................................................................................ 2-2 2.4 Reservoir Data ............................................................................................................................ 2-3 2.4.1 Time Series Data ................................................................................................................ 2-3 2.4.2 Operational Data ................................................................................................................ 2-4 2.5 Model Data ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]