DOCSLIB.ORG

Delegated Budget 2004/05

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Delegated Budget 2004/05 agenda item: 8 Delegated Budget 2004/05 Chiltern Local Committee 5 November 2003 contact officer: Elaine Wyatt 01494 586602 1 Purpose of Report a To review the delegated budget allocation procedure and to identify a process for agreeing the allocation for 2004/05. 2 Options for Consideration Local Committee members are invited to: b consider and comment on the various options for allocating the £125,000 delegated budget, as outlined below and explored in more detail in paragraph g (i) – (iii) below: i. Each Parish to receive an equal share, of £7,500 to be used on schemes agreed with the County Council. ii. Each Parish to receive a weighted share based on the size of the parish. iii. Funds to be allocated on the basis of an assessment criteria agreed by the Local Committee that prioritises requests on an annual basis. c submit bids for the delegated budget or provide any further supporting evidence for bids already submitted, taking account of the decision on the allocation process. Table A (attached) shows the requests received as at 14 October 2003. 3 Details d Until the current financial year the delegated budget fund was £100,000 per committee to fund structural maintenance works, with another £100,000 shared between the four committees ( referred to as the “bonus ball” fund) available for structural highway maintenance schemes which were innovative and/or environmentally orientated. e This changed for 2003/04. The “bonus ball” scheme was dropped and instead each Committee was given £125,000, managed by the Area Manager, and bids no longer had to be confined to structural maintenance works. It was agreed that funding would be considered for any transport related scheme. f Although this widens the scope of the schemes that can be implemented under the delegated budget it also makes the assessment and prioritisation of schemes more complicated. For structural maintenance schemes there is a defined technical assessment that can be used to aid prioritisation. Now it is necessary to compare structural maintenance requests with traffic management requests, such as a new pedestrian crossing. Hence the need to review how this is done. g Options i. Equal share of £7,500 per parish. This is the simplest method but it doesn’t allow for much flexibility. £7,500 would only fund fairly small-scale schemes unless supplemented by other funding. Table A details the bids from parishes received before the publication of this report, and includes a “ball-park” estimate to give Members an idea of likely costs. ii. A weighted share relative to size of parish. This could see the larger parishes receiving a greater proportion than the smaller parishes, who might receive just £2,000 or £3,000 . The counter argument to this option is that the smaller parishes generally have fewer resources and may be less able to supplement the delegated budget with other funding to enable them to use the money effectively. iii. An assessment criteria agreed by the Local Committee. As explained above the assessment criteria developed by the Area Office in previous years is no longer applicable because bids are being made for very different types of schemes. If Members do ask officers to prioritise schemes the following criteria are suggested. These are based on comments received at the meeting in July. These are open to modification: N Is the scheme technically feasible in relation to current regulations but does not meet the priorities to be included on the Councils strategic programme. N Is the scheme likely to reduce road casualty accidents. N Does the scheme take action on a perceived accident problem. N Does the scheme improve facilities for vulnerable road users, i.e. pedestrians, cyclists and the disabled? N Does this scheme have a positive environmental impact? N Is there evidence of local support for the scheme? N Can the cost of the scheme be met from the delegated budget fully and if not is additional funding available from another source? N What proportion of the delegated budget has the parish received in previous years? The more ticks the higher the priority of the scheme using the previous funding criteria to make the final decision. For members information Table B appended to this report details the funding that has been awarded to each parish since 2000/01 through the delegated budget system. h Summary Options i and ii detailed above put the onus on the parish to identify their own priorities for the delegated budget funding subject to any technical restrictions but under option iii the Committee as a whole would agree the programme. Options i. and ii. are fairly inflexible and would only allow small-scale schemes if wholly funded by the delegated budget. Option iii. would allow prioritisation of schemes based on local priorities but the criteria would have to be agreed by the Committee and the final decision on funding would be with the Committee. - Report ends - Table B – Previous Delegated Budget Allocations Parish 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Total Amersham 30000 30000 15000 24000 99000 Ashley Green 4000 4000 Chalfont St Giles 5000 12000 17000 Chalfont St Peter 40000 34000 25000 99000 Chartridge 8000 8000 Chenies 0 Chesham 10000 12000 25000 47000 Chesham Bois 10,000 46000 20000 76000 Colesbury-cum-St Leonards 0 Great Missenden 3000 8000 20000 26000 49000 Latimer 0 Little Missenden 18000 18000 Holmer Green 20000 20000 The Lee 2000 4000 6000 Penn 6000 6000 Prestwood 16000 16000 Seer Green 17000 15000 15000 12000 59000 Figures reflect the amount of money allocated. Final costs may differ Table A: Chiltern Local Delegated Budget Requests Parish Location Description Comments Ballpark estimate Seer Green Pavements around Village Church, Resurface pavements £20-30k Excl. Orchard Road, and on other side of Chalfont Rd from the old Baptist Church to Hearnes Meadow Seer Green Green Meadow on Chalfont Road Rekerbing £10k and around the corner on the road down to Seer Green School/Jubilee Hall Amersham Plantation Road ./ New Road Widen pavement outside shops and and Further information on £15-30k realign junction at New Road – speed type and extent of traffic reducing measures requested calming measures required Amersham First Avenue Resurfacing up the hill £20k Amersham Hillway Footway maintenance £10k Great A413/Deep Mill Lane junction No right turn/improved lighting Improvements under Missenden consideration from other funding source Great A4128 Route survey and implementation of More information is Missenden results required Great Blackthorne Lane, Ballinger Resurfacing/filling potholes Cost will depend on £5-15k Missenden extent of works Great Buryfield School Coach turning area Scheme being Missenden progressed under separate budget Parish Location Description Comments Ballpark estimate Great Central Chilterns traffic Implementation of new signing & speed Scheme being Missenden management area limits progressed under separate budget Great Chiltern Hospital junction Traffic lights Scheme being Missenden progressed under separate budget Great Great Missenden 2nd phase of waiting restrictions review Scheme being Missenden implementation progressed under separate budget Great Great Missenden Extension 30mph limt (London Rd and Speed limit review will Missenden Mobwell ) consider all requests for speed limit changes Great Nags Head Lane Traffic Calming £20-30k Missenden Great Prestwood Green Lane footpath/ further traffic £20-30k Missenden calming Great Prestwood Waiting restriction review £5-10K Missenden implementation Great Prestwood Extension of 30mph limit along A4128 Speed limit review will Missenden Wycombe Road to Peterley consider all requests for speed limit changes Great Prestwood High Street 2nd pedestrian crossing £20k Missenden Great Station Approach Improvements to pavements/prevention £20k Missenden of illegal parking Little Brays Meadow- Hyde Heath Provide hard parking areas on grass £10-25k Missenden verges Parish Location Description Comments Ballpark estimate Little Earl Howe Road, Holmer Green Footway reconstruction £20-30k Missenden Chalfont St Vic Wotton Bridge replacement bridge across the public 1st priority £10k Peter footpath at the rear of the garden of the Greyhound Inn, High Street, Chalfont St Peter. The bridge to be raised to stop it being flooded and replaced with a more 'aesthetically-pleasing' structure with improved landscaping to enhance the environment in the village centre Chalfont St Kingsway Roundabout Improved maintenance/landscaping 2nd priority £5k Peter Chalfont St Gold Hill West Zebra crossing near the shops 3rd priority £20k Peter Chalfont St Denham Lane, Chesham Lane, 30mph roundels painted on the road. 4th priority – the £5k Peter Lower Road, Gold Hill East, Gold locations would have Hill West, Austenwood Lane, Nicol meet the regulations Road and Rickmansworth Lane governing the use of roundals Chalfont St Ninnings Road Resurface c’way £20-30k Peter Chalfont St Copthall Lane Resurface c’way btwn Copthall Corner £20-30k Peter and Denham Lane & renew footway along whole length Chalfont St Denham Lane Renew footway for whole length and £20-30k Peter resurface c’way between Copthall Lane & Garners Lane Parish Location Description Comments Ballpark estimate Chalfont St Garners Lane Footway renewal £20k Peter Penn B474 through Penn Safety Scheme to reduce speed and Estimate would depend £15-25k overtaking involving revised signing, on details road markings etc. Penn cutting/dip in Forty Green Road Road surface repairs/maintenance £5-15k Penn B474 adjacent to the Red Central refuge or other scheme to
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chesham to Great Missenden
    Last checked 21st September 2019 Current status Document last updated Monday, 16th May 2020 This document and information herein are copyrighted to Saturday Walkers’ Club. If you are interested in printing or displaying any of this material, Saturday Walkers’ Club grants permission to use, copy, and distribute this document delivered from this World Wide Web server with the following conditions: * The document will not be edited or abridged, and the material will be produced exactly as it appears. Modification of the material or use of it for any other purpose is a violation of our copyright and other proprietary rights. * Reproduction of this document is for free distribution and will not be sold. * This permission is granted for a one-time distribution. * All copies, links, or pages of the documents must carry the following copyright notice and this permission notice: Saturday Walkers’ Club, Copyright © 2004 - 2020, used with permission. All rights reserved. www.walkingclub.org.uk The publisher cannot accept responsibility for any problems encountered by readers. Chesham to Great Missenden Through the Chilterns via Lee Common Start: Chesham station Finish: Great Missenden station Toughness: 3 out of 10 Length: 15.5km (9.6 miles). For a short Walk notes: This walk makes for an easy walk variation, see below Walk options. day out from London. It starts in Chesham, the hustle and bustle of which Time: 4 hours 45 minutes. For the whole is soon left behind for sloping fields, outing including trains, sights and meals woods and hamlets. The route follows the allow 8 hours 30mins. Chilterns Link, but diverts at Herberts Hole to take a higher, southerly path.
    [Show full text]
  • [Bucks.] Chesham. 444 (Post Office
    [BUCKS.] CHESHAM. 444 (POST OFFICE. miles from Chesham. There is a place of worship for place ofimportance is Hyde Hall, the residence of Benjamin lJaptists. Fuller, Esq., .r.P. CHARTRIDGB is a hamlet in the parish of Chesham, WATERSIDE is a hamlet in the parish of Cheslmm, corn meucing at the verge of the town, and extending about 3! situated in a delightful valley, through which the river Chess miles from Cheshum, surrounded by woodland, on the road flows, which is famous for its abundant supply of trout. It to Aylesbury. There is one Baptist chapel. has extensive manufactories for paper, three flour mills, one HuNDRIDGE is a hamlet in the parish of Chesham, com­ silk mill, outworkers in the making of straw plait, :tlso wood mencing near the town, and extending about 2~ miles from turnery, and the manufactory of shovels for brewers tmd Chesbam, on tlte high road to Great Missenden; the only maltsters, brush handles and boards, and spoons of all sizes. Sexton, Josepb Bunker. Official Establishments, Local Institutions, &c. PosT OFFICE.-Mr. George Devereux, postmaster, l\Iarket Pu:oLIC OFFICERS:- square. Money orders are granted & paid at this office. Commissioner for taking Acknowledgments of Mm·ried Letters arrive from London, Beaconsfield & Taplow at 6.7 Women, ~ for taking Affidavits in Chancery ~ thu a.m. & are dispatched at 6.50 p.m.; letters arrive from Superior Courts at "Westminster, ~ Stewm·d of the Berkhampstead, North of England, Scotland, Ireland, & J.l:lanors o.f Chesham, Righam ~c. John Dunkin Francis, all the towns on the Birmingham railway, per foot post, High street at 6.10 a m.
    [Show full text]
  • BUCKINGHAMSHIRE POSSE COMITATUS 1798 the Posse Comitatus, P
    THE BUCKINGHAMSHIRE POSSE COMITATUS 1798 The Posse Comitatus, p. 632 THE BUCKINGHAMSHIRE POSSE COMITATUS 1798 IAN F. W. BECKETT BUCKINGHAMSHIRE RECORD SOCIETY No. 22 MCMLXXXV Copyright ~,' 1985 by the Buckinghamshire Record Society ISBN 0 801198 18 8 This volume is dedicated to Professor A. C. Chibnall TYPESET BY QUADRASET LIMITED, MIDSOMER NORTON, BATH, AVON PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN BY ANTONY ROWE LIMITED, CHIPPENHAM, WILTSHIRE FOR THE BUCKINGHAMSHIRE RECORD SOCIETY CONTENTS Acknowledgments p,'lge vi Abbreviations vi Introduction vii Tables 1 Variations in the Totals for the Buckinghamshire Posse Comitatus xxi 2 Totals for Each Hundred xxi 3-26 List of Occupations or Status xxii 27 Occupational Totals xxvi 28 The 1801 Census xxvii Note on Editorial Method xxviii Glossary xxviii THE POSSE COMITATUS 1 Appendixes 1 Surviving Partial Returns for Other Counties 363 2 A Note on Local Military Records 365 Index of Names 369 Index of Places 435 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The editor gratefully acknowledges the considerable assistance of Mr Hugh Hanley and his staff at the Buckinghamshire County Record Office in the preparation of this edition of the Posse Comitatus for publication. Mr Hanley was also kind enough to make a number of valuable suggestions on the first draft of the introduction which also benefited from the ideas (albeit on their part unknowingly) of Dr J. Broad of the North East London Polytechnic and Dr D. R. Mills of the Open University whose lectures on Bucks village society at Stowe School in April 1982 proved immensely illuminating. None of the above, of course, bear any responsibility for any errors of interpretation on my part.
    [Show full text]
  • THE DESECRATED CHURCHES of BUCKINGHAMSHIRE. As It Is Not
    THE DESECRATED CHURCHES OF BUCKINGHAMSHIRE. (Continued from Page 85.) DEANERY OF BURN HAM. As it is not the object of these papers to notice Churches attached to Conventual Establishments, unless they were required also for parochial Services, the Chapel which belonged to the monastery at Burnham must be passed over, which leaves only two in this Deanery to be noticed, and these are both in the parish of Chesham. GROVE is an ancient Manor which for many generations belonged to the Cheynes, of Drayton Beauchamp. They had a Mansion there, which, says Lysons, appears to have been strongly fortified, and this is confirmed by the site having still the remains of two moats around it. In the year 1585, John Cheyne of Chesham Bois and Drayton Beauchamp, the same who presented Hooker to the Rectory of Drayton, left Grove to his eldest son, John Cheyne, whom he had disinherited, — but for what reason does not appear, though the epitaph on his tomb, in the Church at King's Langley, indicates that he remained a Roman Catholic, whereas his father had become a zealous Protestant. — Lysons says there was a Chapel at Grove, and at my request the Rev. Bryant Burgess visited it, and has kindly given me the following report: — "The building stands East and West, and there has been a burial ground to the South. Tradition also calls it a Chapel. But I find nothing ecclesiastical in the architecture; and it evidently consisted of two stories. It appears to have been the refectory of a Religious house, with small build- ings, probably dormitories, attached to it.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 3. 1705–1712
    Buckinghamshire Sessions Records County of Buckingham CALENDER to the SESSIONS RECORDS VOLUME III. 1705 to 1712 AND APPENDIX, 1647 Edited by WILLIAM LE HARDY, M.C., F.S.A. GEOFFREY LI. RECKITT, M.C., F.S.A. AYLESBURY: Published by Guy R. Crouch, LL.B., Clerk of the Peace, County Hall. 1939 COMPILED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE STANDING JOINT COMMITTEE OF THE BUCKINGHAMSHIRE QUARTER SESSIONS AND COUNTY COUNCIL. [All Rights Reserved] Printed by HUNT, BARNARD & CO. LTD., AYLESBURY. CONTENTS PAGE Preface . vii-xxxxii Calendar to the Sessions Records, 1705 TO 1712 . 1-305 Appendix i, (a) Justices of the Peace, (B) Sheriffs, 1705 to 1712 306-308 Appendix ii, Document at Doddershall, 1647 . 309-316 Appendix III, Addenda to Volume II . 317-325 Appendix IV, Writs of venire facias and capias ad respondendum, 1705 to 1712 . 326-334 Appendix V, Register of Gamekeepers, 1707 to 1712. 335-345 Appendix VI, Steeple Claydon Highway Rate, 1710 . 346 Appendix VII, Dinton Poor Rate, 1711 . 347-349 Index . 350-427 PREFACE Those who believe that the value of a work of this nature lies in its completeness must suffer a disappointment in the fact that it is now nearly three years since the publication of the last volume of the calendar, and with those who hold such an opinion we have much sympathy and offer our apologies to them. This delay has been caused mainly by the discovery, during the preparation of the work, that many of the documents which go to make up a Sessions Roll had become misplaced. It was thus necessary to examine and arrange all the rolls for a period long after the date when this calendar was likely to end, in order to ensure that all records covering the period would be brought together and noted in the calendar.
    [Show full text]
  • Chartridge 'Hills and Vales'
    when the Royal Free Hospital in London took it over as a History and points of interest maternity hospital. Many a poor father turned up at Chesham Station only to find he had a long walk out to the house. Look A Wright’s Saw Mill: Once a wood mill and tannery demolished for a Grade II listed dovecote in the centre of the courtyard. in 1965. H Little Pednor Farm: The site of a medieval moated farmstead B Chesham 1879 Tennis Club: One of the oldest clubs in known from 12th to 17th century records. Owned by Missenden the world. Abbey and later by the Weedon family. They were a very old C Bury Farm: The farm to the 16th century Bury Hill Mansion. local landowning family. In 1624 Thomas Weedon paid the sum The mansion was demolished in 1804, some say as a bet of £350 to erect four almshouses for four good and godly between rival families. Whoever lost had to demolish their women of the parish. To maintain the properties a hundred house. In the 1930s the farm acres of land was purchased in Hundridge. played host to the flying Farmland towards Chesham I Chartridge: Derives from the Saxon ‘Caerda’s Ridge’ and is one circuses of pioneer airmen Alan of the ancient hamlets of Chesham. In olden times families would Cobham and Henry Seagrave. take their names from the area so one of the earliest records is For 10 shillings (50p) locals Chartridge ‘Hills and Vales’ the name de Charterugge or de Chardrugge. In the 16th and could have a ten minute flight 17th centuries, with the rapid growth in agriculture, many farms around the town.
    [Show full text]
  • Buckinghamshire Family History Society Baptisms Amersham
    Buckinghamshire Family History Society Baptisms Amersham St Mary 1561 - 1901 Published 13 Apr 1774 James son of Thos & Bethia HOLIMAN 3 May 1795 Charlotte bastard of Jas HOLLIMAN & Mary HOBBS Ashendon St Mary 1590 - 1906 Published 25 Sep 1726 John son of Thomas & Mary HOLMAN (BT) 28 Apr 1728 Thomas son of Thomas & Mary HOLMAN (BT) 11 Feb 1733 Elizabeth child of Tho & Mary HOLMAN (BT) 11 Feb 1733 Elizabeth child of Thomas & Mary HOLMAN Aylesbury St Mary 1565 - 1901 Published 1 Sep 1802 Mary Ann born 7 Aug 1802 daughter of Richard & Ann HOLLYMAN 19 Feb 1804 Elizabeth born 3 Nov 1803 daughter of Richard & Ann HOLLYMAN 15 Jan 1806 Maria born 13 Oct 1805 daughter of Richard & Ann HOLLYMAN 9 Mar 1808 James born 13 Oct 1807 son of Richard & Ann HOLLYMAN 2 May 1810 Caroline born 27 Dec 1809 daughter of Richard & Ann HOLLYMAN 14 Oct 1831 Ann daughter of James & Amy HOLLIMAN of Walton, Butcher 15 Mar 1833 Susannah daughter of James & Amy HOLLYMAN of Walton, Butcher Beaconsfield St Mary with All Saints 1575 - 1901 Published 21 Apr 1769 Sarah daughter of James & Eliz HOLLOWMAN Bierton St James 1560 - 1901 1 Oct 1797 Thomas son of Thomas & Mary HOLLYMAN 22 Sep 1799 Richard son of Thomas & Mary HOLLYMAN Buckingham St Peter & St Paul 1561 - 1902 Published 13 Jun 1664 Thomas son of Thomas HO... 7 Apr 1688 Nathanill son of Edward HOLMAN Burnham St Peter 1557 - 1907 27 May 1792 Thomas born 17 Apr son of John & Sarah HOLMAN 14 Sep 1794 Elizabeth daughter of John & Sarah HOLMAN 27 Nov 1796 John son of John & Sarah HOLMOND 20 Jan 1799 Thomas son of John &
    [Show full text]
  • BUCKINGHAMSHIRE POTS, POTTERS and POTTERIES, C.1200–1910 by MICHAEL FARLEY and BARBARA HURMAN Offprinted from RECORDS of BUCKS
    BUCKINGHAMSHIRE POTS, POTTERS AND POTTERIES, C.1200–1910 BY MICHAEL FARLEY AND BARBARA HURMAN Offprinted from RECORDS OF BUCKS Vol. 55 2015 BUCKINGHAMSHIRE POTS, POTTERS AND POTTERIES, c.1200–1910 MICHAEL FARLEY AND BARBARA HURMAN An attempt is made to list Buckinghamshire’s pottery production sites and potters from the thirteenth century until c.1910 and to give a short description of their products where known. The information is derived from confirmed kiln sites, from surface finds of ‘waster’ material which indicate production, and from a range of documentary sources including field names. There remains considerable scope for further local research; a number of suspected production sites have not yet been located on the ground and further local study would certainly identify other potters and link named potters to specific locations. Several features have emerged from the study. Firstly, a number of production sites are known to have been active in recent centuries, but for which there is no earlier record. It is suspected that some of these may have had earlier undocumented activity. Secondly, and perhaps unsurprisingly, many pottery centres were located on agriculturally marginal land. Thirdly, several of the pottery families followed their trade over generations and this is likely to have been the case long before documentation becomes available. Finally, the number of ‘pot hawkers’ recorded, particularly in the mid-nineteenth century, is surprising as it almost equals the number of working potters; their role in distributing the wares of country potteries may have been underestimated in the past. quently exposed, for example by being ploughed up, I NTRODUCT ION weathering of their relatively soft and open fabric Until shortly before the Roman conquest all pottery may leave little trace of them.
    [Show full text]
  • Elly's , Index to !(Elly's
    INDEX TO !(ELLY'S , BUCKINGIIAl\ISIIIRE DIREOTORY. ----.---- PAGE PAGE I PAGE PAGE Abbots Aston 276 Buckland Common, see Datchet ••••..••.••....••.• 317 Great King-'s Hm, see Allkhampstead 272 Bnckland 302 Datchet Mead, see Datchet 317 Hug'henden 3i2 • Addington ••......••••.... 272 Burners Holt, see 'Vater Datchet St. Helen's, see Great King'shill, see Prest- AdstOCK .•••....••u •••••••• 272 Stratford..•......•••••.. 401 Datchet ..••••••••.••••• 317 wood...•..•••.•••...••.• 375 A~mondeshm. see Amrshm 273 Bullington End, see Han- Dean-North, see Hugh- Great Linford 350 Akeley•...••.•••..•••.•••• 272 slope ........•., .••••.. '" 335 enden ••••..••....•..•••. 342 Great l\Iarlow ......•••••• 354 Amersham 273 Burcot, see Wing- 407 Denham 318 Great ~Jissenden 363 AmershamHill,seeWycomb 419 Burcott, see Bierton 289 Denham, see Quainton 378 Great Penn's !fead, see Ankerwycke, sl'eWraysbry 415 Burnbam." 302 Denner Hill, see Prestwood 375 Wycombe 417 ArngTove, see Boarstall., .• 292 Bnrnbam Beeches·seeBurn- Dinton...•..••••.•......•• 318 Great Seabrook, see Iving- Ascott, see Wing 407 ham 302 Ditton, see Stoke Poges 389 hoe 3i5 Ash Furlong, see Olney ..•• 371 Bnrnham-East, see Burn- Doddershall, see Quainton 378 Great Wolston ........•••• 411 Ashendon•.••.•....••.••••• 275 ham.•••••..•••.••••.••••• 302 Dorney 319 Green Hig-hland, see Ashl.'ridg-e, see Chesham 308 Burston, see Aston Abbotts 276 DorneyWood,see Burnham 303 :l\Ionks Risborough ...... 365 Ashley Green 275 Bury End, see Amersham.. 271 Dorton 319 Green Valley, see Astwood 277 Askett,seeMonksRisboro'
    [Show full text]
  • CHESHAM, with ASHRIDGE, BELLINGDON, ASHLEY GREEN, BOTLEY, CHARTRIDGE, HUNDRIDGE, and WATERSIDE
    DIRECTORY.] 443 CHESHAM. [BUCKS.] PosT OPFICE.-Jobn Andrews, receiver. Letters arrive INSURANCE AGBNT.-Leeds ~ Y01·kshire Fire ~ Life, through Tring at 8.45 a.m.; dispat<'hed at 5 p.m. The John Andrews nearest money order office i~ at Tring Station Master, Robert Bugden National Sclwol, John Lewis, master Damer Rev. Lionel Dawson W. M.A. Cox Joseph, shopkeeper Pickett William H. shopkeeper [rectorl, Rectory Elliott Thomas, butcher & shopkeeper Punter Samuel, farmer Andrews!ohn, shopkeeper & postmaster Gale William, farmer Reed Thomas, blacksmith Archer George, farmer Harrowill William, boot & shoe maker Stevens Thomas, Three Horseshoes Archer John, farmer J oily John, farmer Tompkins "Tilliam, wheelwright Archer William, Old Swan Langbourn John, baker & shopkeeper Turner Elizabeth (Mrs.), shopkeeper Ash by Thomas, beer retailer Millins Daniel, straw dealer Williamson John, Aylesbury Arm.~,&; Bird William, baker Montague Richard, wheelwright brewer OHENIES is a village and parish, 5 miles south-south­ and endowed in 1603 by Anne, Countess of Warwick, east from Chesham, 4 east from Amersham, and 4 north­ daughter of the second Earl of Bedford. The population in north-west from Rickmansworth, in the hundred of Burn­ 1861 was 468; the acreage is 1,744, chiefly woodland; the ham, union and rural deanery of Amersham, county court soil is gravel, flint, and chalk. district of Chesham, archdeaconry of Buckingham, and Pm·ish Clerk, Robert Hockley. diocese of Oxford, near the Chess stream. The church of St. :Michael has been recently nearly rebuilt, and is now a • lmndsome building, with square tower, nave, aisle, chancel, PosT 0FFICE.-Thomas Barr, postmaster. Letters from and 6 bells.
    [Show full text]
  • 4936 the LONDON GAZETTE, OCTOBER 4, 1881S
    4936 THE LONDON GAZETTE, OCTOBER 4, 1881s area or part of an area infected with foot-and- Derbyshire.—(1.*) The whole of the petty sessional mouth disease, is hereby declared to be free from division of Derby, in the county of Derby, and foot-and-mouth disease, and that township shall, the borough of Derby. as from the commencement of this Order, cease (2.) The petty sessional divisions of Ash- to be an area or part of an area infected with bourne, and Sudbury, in the county of Derby, foot-and-mouth disease. C. L. Peel. (3.) The parish of Crich, in the petty sessional division of Belper, in the county oi Derby. T the Council Chamber, Whitehall, the Is (4.) The petty sessional division of Swadlin* A day of October, 1881. cote, in the county of Derby. By Her Majesty's Most Honourable Privy (5.) The petty sessional division of Bepton Council. and Gresley, in the county of Derby. Lords and others of Her Majesty's Mos Dorsetshire.—(1.) The parish of Owermoigue, in Honourable Privy Council, by virtue and in the petty sessional division of Dorchester, in exercise of the powers in them vested under The the county of Dorset. Contagious Diseases (Animals) Act, "1 878, "and o (2.) The tything and hamlet of Plush in the every other power enabling them in this behalf parish of Buckland Newton, and the higher do order, and it is hereby ordered, as follows : tything of Piddletrenthide in the parish of 1 . This Order shall take effect from and imme- Piddletrenthide, in the petty sessional division diately after the third day of October, one thou- of Cerne, in the county of Dorset.
    [Show full text]
  • HOLLYMAN Burials, 1639-1839, Buckinghamshire, England
    Buckinghamshire Family History Society Burials Amersham St Mary 1561 - 1904 Published 4 Feb 1772 Sophia HOLIMAN, infant, affidavit made by Eliz Wall Aylesbury St Mary 1565 - 1901 Published 7 Nov 1729 Moses HOLLYMAN, Millwright 31 Mar 1830 Ann HOLLYMAN aged 51 of Aylesbury Beaconsfield St Mary with All Saints 1540 - 1901 Published 15 May 1767 Ann HOLMAN daughter of George & Susannah Brill All Saints 1586 - 1901 Published 18 1734 Elizabeth H..., widow (BT) Buckingham St Peter & St Paul 1558 - 1902 Published 21 May 1676 Elizabeth HOLMAN, widow 29 Aug 1683 Judeth HOLMAN wife of Edward , according to the Act 12 May 1702 Catherine HOLMAN, Lacemaker of the Borough Burnham St Peter 1561 - 1901 7 Jan 1743 Elizabeth HOLLYMAN, a poor Servant 22 Jan 1817 William HOLLYMON aged 68 of Burnham Grove 28 Nov 1821 William HO...? aged 1 of Egypt 15 Apr 1839 Alfred H...? aged 12 of Burnham Castlethorpe St Simon & St Jude 1562 - 1903 28 Sep 1684 Emme HOLMAN daughter of Thomas (BT) 22 Apr 1686 Adam HOLMAN son of Thomas (BT) 2 Jul 1690 Robert HOLMAN son of Thomas (BT) Chearsley St Nicholas 1576 - 1901 Published 9 Jan 1736 Mary HOLLIMAN (HOLEYMAN) Cholesbury St Laurence 1583 - 1906 Published 31 Mar 1701 Good wife HOLLYMAN of Buckland, buried in woollen 30 Mar 1720 Will HOLLYMAN of Buckland, buried in woollen Chesham St Mary 1538 - 1933 5 Nov 1693 A male child of Francis & Sarah HOLLIMAN, affidavit made 14 Nov 1693 Sarah HOLLIMAN wife of Francis, Clothier, affidavit made 1 Jan 1700 Francis HOLYMAN son of Francis & Jane of the towne, affidavit made 20 Apr 1708
    [Show full text]