Variations in Amounts of Tobacco Tar Retrieved from Selected Models of Smoking Behavior Simulated by Smoking Machine*

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Variations in Amounts of Tobacco Tar Retrieved from Selected Models of Smoking Behavior Simulated by Smoking Machine* Variations in Amounts of Tobacco Tar Retrieved from Selected Models of Smoking Behavior Simulated by Smoking Machine* SAXONGRAHAM,SHIRLEYCROUCH,MORTONL. LEVIN,ANDFREDG. BOCK (Department of Epidemiology, Rosiceli Park Memorial Institute, Buffalo, New York) SUMMARY The observation was made of variations in human cigarette smoking habits. This suggested that examination by an analytic smoking machine be undertaken to discover whether yields of tobacco tar in simulations of these habits might differ. It was found in various experiments that: (a) Smoking a given number of puffs over a long period of time results in greater tar retrieval than smoking them over a short period. (6) Tak ing most of the puffs at the end of the cigarette results in the highest tar retrieval, puffing at regular intervals throughout the life of the cigarette gives the next largest yield, and taking most puffs at the beginning, the smallest retrieval, (c) Puffs taken at the end of a cigarette yield about twice the tar of puffs taken at the beginning. Further research is being conducted on lung cancer and control patients to deter mine possible differences in the extent to which they exhibit high and low tar-retrieval models. A large number of investigations dealing with and controls. If certain methods were found to both animals and humans, retrospectively and characterize cancer cases more than controls, in prospectively, utilizing a variety of research de formation might be at hand out of which preven signs, and in several different countries have dis tive measures could be fashioned. If it were found, covered close relationships between cigarette furthermore, that those models of smoking be smoke and tars and the development of cancer at havior which are peculiar to lung cancer patients exposed sites. Data on patients at Roswell Park also expose the smoker to more tar, additional Memorial Institute are typical in showing a risk evidence would be available implicating tobacco of lung cancer approximately 6 times higher among tar as a carcinogen. Observations of individuals cigarette smokers than among nonsmokers (3). smoking cigarettes in public places such as bus, At the same time, it is observed that not all railroad, airline, and hospital waiting rooms, and smokers develop this disease. Smokers who do and in hotel lobbies in the Buffalo area, revealed that do not develop lung cancer are of interest because humans exhibit a number of variations in smoking knowledge of differences in their response to ciga behavior. Details of these variations will be de rette smoke, or in the methods of smoking they scribed in a later paper, but it can be noted here utilize, may further elucidate characteristics pre that there were large differences in the number of disposing to or protecting against lung cancer. puffs taken on a given cigarette by smokers, in Comparisons of nonsmokers who do or do not the length of time taken to smoke a cigarette to develop lung cancer of specific histologie types the point at which it is extinguished, and in the could be instructive in similar fashion. length of time taken to smoke a given number of The present research developed out of an in puffs. Furthermore, it was observed that the fre terest in the possible variations in methods uti quency of puffing often varied at different stages lized in smoking cigarettes by lung cancer cases in the smoking of a given cigarette. Three patterns * This research was supported in part by American Cancer ofpuffing behavior were observed :puffing at approx Society Grants E-58C, E-58D, and E-58E. imately equal frequency throughout the life of a Received for publication February 20, 1963. cigarette; taking puffs slowly at the beginning of 1025 Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on October 8, 2021. © 1963 American Association for Cancer Research. 1026 Cancer Research Vol. 23, August 1963 the cigarette and increasing their frequency to the complete end of the cigarette. The cigarettes ward the end; and puffing most frequently imme were protected from drafts while burning, and diately after lighting the cigarette and gradually were extinguished after the last puff in a series. diminishing the frequency toward the end of the Butt length was recorded. A number of cigarettes cigarette. was smoked in each experiment to provide suffi After the discovery of these variations, further cient tar for accurate measurement and lessened studies were conducted to examine the extent to variation. Each experiment was completed in a which these variations characterized patients at single day to control factors such as daily varia Roswell Park Memorial Institute, as will be dis tions in humidity and the possible effect of such a cussed in a later paper. It was found that a given variation on tar retrieval. smoker fairly consistently exhibited a given kind The Ecusta Smoking Machine utilized in these of smoking behavior from one cigarette to another. experiments is of the analytic type and has the The conclusion that the patterns observed were capacity to produce smoke under a variety of probably real led us to begin two types of studies : controlled conditions (5). Twenty cigarettes can first, a comparison of the smoking patterns of lung be puffed serially for 2 seconds each. To achieve cancer and control patients to discover whether variations in frequency, the cigarettes were moved differences in smoking patterns might exist, and to different positions manually in sequences I-V. second, a simulation of the various patterns on an A small amount of smoke was lost in this process. analytic smoking machine to determine whether Although this loss was equally distributed among the yield of tar from smoking according to each experimental groups, in later sequences the hoses pattern varies. The first study continues. The leading from the piston to the smoking positions present paper reports on the second. Briefly, it was were moved from position to position, as the found that smoking a given number of puffs over design demanded, with minimal loss of smoke. a long period of time yields more tar than smoking The machine was adjusted to give a puff volume them over a short period, that increasing puffing of 35 ml. in 2 seconds. frequency toward the end of a cigarette results in In sequences I-III, and the first two experi more tar than smoking more frequently at the ments of sequences IV and V, the tar was obtained beginning, and that puffs taken toward the end through condensing it at —70°C. in a helical of a cigarette contain more tar than those taken glass coil surrounded by dry ice in alcohol. This at the beginning. was washed out with 25 ml. of 3:2 alcohol :toluene and the solvent evaporated in a 50°-60°C.oven MATERIALS AND METHODS for 5 hours to obtain dry tar weight. Optical densi Sequences of experiments, to be described in the ty of the tar solution was also measured, at 375 findings, were utilized to examine the tar yields m/i. In subsequent experiments, the collecting coil of various models of smoking behavior. Through was replaced by two filling funnels. Without alter out these experiments one brand of cigarette was ation of its temperature the smoke was drawn utilized. Before a given experiment, a carton was through a Cambridge filter1 clamped between the selected from a stored lot, and enough packages tops of the funnels. The filters were weighed be chosen from the carton to provide cigarettes fore and after the tar was trapped on them. Only meeting the conditions of the research. One of filters of similar weight prior to use were employed these was that, when the air resistance of the in the experiments. It was found that all three cigarette was measured, the negative pressure methods of measuring tar gave comparable results. required to draw 17.5 ml/sec of air through the The experiments of sequences I, III, VII, and cigarette was between 2 and 2£inches of water. VIII were pilot experiments in that it was in these Those outside the range were discarded as were that the above-mentioned methods were devel cigarettes outside the weight range of .948-1.01 oped. The findings in them are deemed to be either gm. Those of like weights within that range were incomplete or unreliable. This paper, therefore, allocated to each of the experimental groups. reports only on experiments in sequences II, IV- Subsequent to measuring air resistance and VI, IX, and X. weighing, in all sequences except II, IV, and V, RESULTS cigarettes were individually wrapped in aluminum Sequences IV and V.—The hypothesis to be foil and put aside in order of weight until use on tested in these sequences of experiments was that the same day. Cigarettes were always inserted into smoking a given number of puffs over a long the smoking machine receptacles with the brand period of time provides a greater yield of tar than name out. They were carefully ignited with an electric lighter so as to obtain a uniform light over 1Filter Media 101, Cambridge Filter Corp., Syracuse, N.Y. Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on October 8, 2021. © 1963 American Association for Cancer Research. GRAHAMetal.—TobaccoTar from Smoking Machine 1027 the same number of puffs taken over a short cigarette smoking would result in different re period of time. trievals of tar. The models were : Cigarettes in sequence IV were smoked for 12 1. Taking most puffs at the beginning of the minutes, over which time seven puffs were taken cigarette—specifically, of a total of twelve puffs, at regular intervals of 2 minutes between puffs. taking the first seven in the first 2 minutes after Those in sequence V were also puffed 7 times but lighting, the next four puffs in regular intervals at equal 1-minute intervals and over a period of over 4 minutes, waiting 2 minutes, and taking the 6 minutes.
Recommended publications
  • Tobacco Labelling -.:: GEOCITIES.Ws
    Council Directive 89/622/EC concerning the labelling of tobacco products, as amended TAR AND NICOTINE CONTENTS OF THE CIGARETTES SOLD ON THE EUROPEAN MARKET AUSTRIA Brand Tar Yield Nicotine Yield Mg. Mg. List 1 A3 14.0 0.8 A3 Filter 11.0 0.6 Belvedere 11.0 0.8 Camel Filters 14.0 1.1 Camel Filters 100 13.0 1.1 Camel Lights 8.0 0.7 Casablanca 6.0 0.6 Casablanca Ultra 2.0 0.2 Corso 4.0 0.4 Da Capo 9.0 0.4 Dames 9.0 0.6 Dames Filter Box 9.0 0.6 Ernte 23 13.0 0.8 Falk 5.0 0.4 Flirt 14.0 0.9 Flirt Filter 11.0 0.6 Golden Smart 12.0 0.8 HB 13.0 0.9 HB 100 14.0 1.0 Hobby 11.0 0.8 Hobby Box 11.0 0.8 Hobby Extra 11.0 0.8 Johnny Filter 11.0 0.9 Jonny 14.0 1.0 Kent 10.0 0.8 Kim 8.0 0.6 Kim Superlights 4.0 0.4 Lord Extra 8.0 0.6 Lucky Strike 13.0 1.0 Lucky Strike Lights 9.0 0.7 Marlboro 13.0 0.9 Marlboro 100 14.0 1.0 Marlboro Lights 7.0 0.6 Malboro Medium 9.0 0.7 Maverick 11.0 0.8 Memphis Classic 11.0 0.8 Memphis Blue 12.0 0.8 Memphis International 13.0 1.0 Memphis International 100 14.0 1.0 Memphis Lights 7.0 0.6 Memphis Lights 100 9.0 0.7 Memphis Medium 9.0 0.6 Memphis Menthol 7.0 0.5 Men 11.0 0.9 Men Light 5.0 0.5 Milde Sorte 8.0 0.5 Milde Sorte 1 1.0 0.1 Milde Sorte 100 9.0 0.5 Milde Sorte Super 6.0 0.3 Milde Sorte Ultra 4.0 0.4 Parisienne Mild 8.0 0.7 Parisienne Super 11.0 0.9 Peter Stuyvesant 12.0 0.8 Philip Morris Super Lights 4.0 0.4 Ronson 13.0 1.1 Smart Export 10.0 0.8 Treff 14.0 0.9 Trend 5.0 0.2 Trussardi Light 100 6.0 0.5 United E 12.0 0.9 Winston 13.0 0.9 York 9.0 0.7 List 2 Auslese de luxe 1.0 0.1 Benson & Hedges 12.0 1.0 Camel 15.0 1.0
    [Show full text]
  • Youth Bidi, Kretek, Or Pipe Tobacco Use
    2013 Florida Youth Tobacco Survey: Fact Sheet 10 Youth Bidi, Kretek, or Pipe Tobacco Use Introduction The Florida Youth Tobacco Survey (FYTS) was administered in the spring of 2013 to 6,440 middle school students and 6,175 high school students in 172 public schools throughout the state. The overall survey response rate for middle schools was 83%, and the overall survey response rate for high schools was 75%. The FYTS has been conduct- ed annually since 1998. The data presented in this fact sheet are weighted to represent the entire population of public middle and high school students in Florida. About Bidis, Kreteks, and Pipe Tobacco Bidis are small brown cigarettes from India consisting of tobacco wrapped in a leaf tied together with a thread. Bidis have higher levels of nicotine, carbon monoxide, and tar than traditional cigarettes. Kreteks are cigarettes containing tobacco and clove extract. In 2009, the Food and Drug Administration banned kreteks, along with flavored cigarettes, from being sold in the United States. Pipe tobacco comes either plain or flavored and is smoked through a pipe. On previous FYTS fact sheets, bidis, kreteks, and pipe tobacco have been Figure 1. Ever Tried Bidis, Kreteks, or Pipe Tobacco 8.4 8.5 reported as “specialty tobacco” products. 9 8.0 8 7.2 7.1 Ever Tried Bidis, Kreteks, or Pipe Tobacco 7 5.9 6 In 2013, 2.5% of middle school and 5.9% of high 5 4 3.2 school students had tried smoking a bidi, kretek, or Percent 2.9 3.0 3.0 2.5 2.5 pipe tobacco at least once (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Report Heated Tobacco Products
    Heated Tobacco Products Task Force Technical Report Heated Tobacco Products (HTPs): Standardized Terminology and Recommendations for the Generation and Collection of Emissions July 2020 Author and Sub-Group Secretary: Jason Flora, Altria Client Services, U.S.A. Task-Force Coordinator: Helena Digard, British American Tobacco, U.K. Co-Author and Task Force Member: Colin Sinclair, Japan Tobacco Inc., U.K. Co-Author and Task Force Member: Maxim Belushkin, Philip Morris International, Switzerland Table of Contents 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 3 2. Organisations .................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Participants ................................................................................................................ 3 3. Definitions ........................................................................................................................ 4 3.1 Category Definition ................................................................................................... 5 3.2 Sub-Category Definitions .......................................................................................... 5 3.3 Additional Definitions ............................................................................................... 7 4. Recommendations for the Generation and Collection of Emissions ................................ 7 4.1 General Requirements ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Key Dates in Tobacco Regulation 1962 — 2020
    Key dates in tobacco regulation 1962 — 2020 16 Further information about the early history of tobacco is available at: www.tobacco.org/History/history.html 1962 The first Royal College of Physicians (RCP) report, "Smoking and Health", was published. It received massive publicity. The main recommendations were: restriction of tobacco advertising; increased taxation on cigarettes; more restrictions on the sales of cigarettes to children, and smoking in public places; and more information on the tar/nicotine content of cigarettes. For the first time in a decade, cigarette sales fell. The Tobacco Advisory Committee (subsequently Council, and now known as the Tobacco Manufacturers’ Association) - which represents the interests of the tobacco industry - agreed to implement a code of advertising practice for cigarettes which was intended to take some of the glamour out of cigarette advertisements. The code was based on the former ITA code governing cigarette advertisements on TV (before they were removed in 1964, with the co-operation of the ITA) 1964 The US Surgeon General produced his first report on "Smoking and Health". Its conclusions corroborated those of the RCP and the US Surgeon General has produced annual reports since 1967 on the health consequences on smoking. Doll and Hill published the results of a nationwide prospective survey on "mortality in relation to smoking: 10 years' observations in British Doctors". Between 1951 and 1964 about half the UK's doctors who smoked gave up and there was a dramatic fall in lung cancer incidence among those who gave up as opposed to those who continued to smoke. 1965 After considerable debate, the government used the powers vested in it under the terms of the 1964 Television Act to ban cigarette advertisements on television.
    [Show full text]
  • TAR WARS PROGRAM GUIDE Instructions for Implementing 2021-2022 School Year
    TAR WARS PROGRAM GUIDE Instructions for Implementing 2021-2022 School Year Supported in part by a grant from the American Academy of Family Physicians Foundation. TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Introduction to Tar Wars ........................................2 Tips for Teachers .................................................3 Tips for Presenters ................................................4 Quick Guide for Presenters ..........................................5 Cigarettes Activity 1: What’s in a Cigarette? .......................................6 Activity 2: “Sticky Person” ...........................................7 Activity 3: Financial Impact ..........................................8 Activity 4: Effects on Breathing .......................................9 Activity 5: Lung Damage and Disease Risk from Smoke .................... 10 E-cigarettes, Vapes, and Other ENDS Activity 6: Electronic Cigarettes .....................................11-12 Activity 7: What is JUUL®? .......................................... 13 Activity 8: Vaping Fortune Teller ...................................... 14 Activity 9: Effects of Vaping on the Body .............................15-16 Other Tobacco Products Activity 10: Smokeless Flavored Tobacco Products ........................ 17 Activity 11: Flavored Cigars and Cigarillos ............................... 18 Activity 12: Hookah .............................................19-20 Big Tobacco - Selling Harmful Substances Activity 13: Power of Advertising ....................................21-22 Activity
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Cigarette Smoke Residues from Textiles on Fibroblasts, Neurocytes and Zebrafish Embryos and Nicotine Permeation Through Human Skin
    Rapid #: -9790593 CROSS REF ID:448615 LENDER: TWHRI :: Main Library BORROWER: CLO :: Main Library TYPE: Article CC:CCG JOURNAL TITLE: International journal of hygiene and environmental health USER JOURNAL TITLE:International journal of hygiene and environmental health. ARTICLE TITLE: Effects of cigarette smoke residues from textiles on fibroblasts, neurocytes and zebrafish embryos and nicotine permeation through human skin ARTICLE AUTHOR: Hammer VOLUME: 214 ISSUE: 5 MONTH: September YEAR: 2011 PAGES: 384-391 ISSN: 1438-4639 OCLC #: Processed by RapidX: 10/15/2015 8:59:11 PM This material may be protected by copyright law (Title 17 U.S. Code) International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health 214 (2011) 384-391 International Journal Contents lists available at ScienceDi rect Hygiene Environmental Health International Journal of Hygiene and .1r . Environmental Health ELSEVIER journal homepage: www.elsevier.de/ijheh Effects of cigarette smoke residues from textiles on fibroblasts, neurocytes and zebrafish embryos and nicotine permeation through human skin Timo R. Hammer*, Kirsten Fischer, Marina Mueller, Dirk Hoefer Hohenstein Institutes, Institute for Hygiene and Biotechnology, Schloss Hohenstein, 74357 Boennigheim, Germany ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: Toxic substances from cigarette smoke can attach to carpets, curtains, clothes or other surfaces and Received 8 February 2011 thus may pose risks to affected persons. The phenomenon itself and the potential hazards are discussed Received in revised form 5 April 2011 controversially, but scientific data are rare. The objective of this study was to examine the potential of Accepted 29 April 2011 textile-bound nicotine for permeation through human skin and to assess the effects of cigarette smoke extracts from clothes on fibroblasts, neurocytes and zebrafish embryos.
    [Show full text]
  • What's in Cigarettes & Roll-Your-Own Tobacco
    What’s in cigarettes & roll-your-own tobacco Cigarette smoke is a complex mixture of over 7000 chemicals.1 These chemicals are present as: • gases, such as carbon monoxide and hydrogen sulphide • volatile organic compounds (VOCs), such as benzene, acetone and hydrogen cyanide • part of tiny solid particles, such as nicotine and naphthalene.1 Many of the chemicals in cigarette smoke come from burning tobacco; the remainder come from burning cigarette paper, agricultural chemicals left on the tobacco leaves, and chemicals added during the cigarette making process.1-4 Once inhaled into the lungs, many of these chemicals pass through the lungs walls into the blood stream and go to every part of the body.5 Roll-your-own (RYO) tobacco Some roll-your-own smokers believe that roll-your-own tobacco is more 'natural' and does not contain additives like factory-made cigarettes do.6 Because of this, they believe that roll-your-own tobacco is less harmful.7, 8 None of these beliefs are true. • Tobacco companies add similar additives to roll-your-own tobacco as they do to cigarettes, often in higher amounts than in factory-made cigarettes.6 • Most of the toxic chemicals in tobacco smoke come from burning the tobacco.4 Even smoking tobacco without any additives would be very harmful. • Research suggests that roll-your-own tobacco is at least as harmful, or possibly more harmful, than smoking factory-made cigarettes.9-12 Tar Tar is the sticky brown substance which can stain smokers’ fingers and teeth yellow-brown.4, 13 It also stains the lung tissue.1, 14 ‘Tar’ describes the solid particles a smoker inhales when he or she draws on a lit cigarette.15 Each particle consists of a large variety of chemicals, including a number of cancer causing substances (carcinogens).
    [Show full text]
  • Tobacco and Kretek: Indonesian Drugs in Historical Change Arnez, Monika
    www.ssoar.info Tobacco and Kretek: Indonesian drugs in historical change Arnez, Monika Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Arnez, M. (2009). Tobacco and Kretek: Indonesian drugs in historical change. ASEAS - Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, 2(1), 49-69. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-362761 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY-NC-ND Lizenz This document is made available under a CC BY-NC-ND Licence (Namensnennung-Nicht-kommerziell-Keine Bearbeitung) zur (Attribution-Non Comercial-NoDerivatives). For more Information Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.de ASEAS 2 (1) Monika Arnez - Tobacco and Kretek: Indonesian Drugs in Historical Change Aktuelle Südostasienforschung / Current Research on South-East Asia Tobacco and Kretek: Indonesian Drugs in Historical Change Monika Arnez1 University of Hamburg, Germany / Universität Hamburg, Deutschland ASEAS - Österreichische Zeitschrift für Südostasienwissenschaften / Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies SEAS - Gesellschaft für Südostasienwissenschaften / Society for South-East Asian Studies - www.SEAS.at The clove cigarettes (kretek) industry is the second largest employer in Indonesia, after the Indonesian government. Between 4 and 17 million people are employed in this industry, including areas such as cultivation, trading, transport, advertisement and production of clove cigarettes. The Indonesian government depends on the kretek industry because of its important economic function. This paper contributes to tracing the historical development of kretek, considering economic, social and political aspects.
    [Show full text]
  • Heated Tobacco Products
    HEATED TOBACCO PRODUCTS: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS by Guy Bentley September 2019 Reason Foundation’s mission is to advance a free society by developing, applying and promoting libertarian principles, including individual liberty, free markets and the rule of law. We use journalism and public policy research to influence the frameworks and actions of policymakers, journalists and opinion leaders. Reason Foundation’s nonpartisan public policy research promotes choice, competition and a dynamic market economy as the foundation for human dignity and progress. Reason produces rigorous, peer- reviewed research and directly engages the policy process, seeking strategies that emphasize cooperation, flexibility, local knowledge and results. Through practical and innovative approaches to complex problems, Reason seeks to change the way people think about issues, and promote policies that allow and encourage individuals and voluntary institutions to flourish. Reason Foundation is a tax-exempt research and education organization as defined under IRS code 501(c)(3). Reason Foundation is supported by voluntary contributions from individuals, foundations and corporations. The views are those of the author, not necessarily those of Reason Foundation or its trustees. HEATED TOBACCO PRODUCTS: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS i TABLE OF CONTENTS FAQ 1: WHAT ARE HEATED TOBACCO PRODUCTS? ..................................................................................................... 1 FAQ 2: ARE HEATED TOBACCO PRODUCTS DANGEROUS? ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Iqos in the U.S
    » IQOS IN THE U.S. EXAMINING THE LAUNCH » OF THE COUNTRY’S NEWEST ELECTRONIC TOBACCO PRODUCT As e-cigarettes drive youth tobacco use to highs unseen in nearly two decades, a new electronic nicotine delivery device marketing itself as Big Tobacco 2.0: a high-tech, luxury product has entered the U.S. market. IQOS, the IQOS and a new latest product from tobacco giant Philip Morris International (PMI), claims to be an innovative tobacco product that reduces exposure to industry strategy chemicals by heating tobacco to produce a nicotine aerosol. In 2019, after years of regulatory debate, the Food and Drug Administration IQOS is part of a larger tobacco permitted the sale of IQOS, and in July 2020, the agency gave PMI industry strategy to overhaul its the green light to market the product with the claim that it reduces reputation with novel products a user's exposure to harmful or potentially harmful chemicals, but and electronic devices, including importantly did not authorize the claim that it reduces health risks heated tobacco products and associated with cigarette smoking. We are just beginning to see what e-cigarettes. In “Spinning a new tobacco industry,” Truth Initiative these decisions might mean for public health in this country. To get exposes the industry’s tactics a first look at potential implications, Truth Initiative researched IQOS to rebrand its public image marketing, including visiting the first U.S. stores selling the product, and position itself as working and analyzed information on who might be using IQOS. What we found alongside public health, all was a carefully executed plan to present IQOS as the future of tobacco, the while continuing to expand complete with luxury stores, ads in high-end magazines, and a billion- its bottom line by continuing dollar investment in “smoke-free” products — all designed to grow to market deadly combustible the market for nicotine with both new users and by keeping current tobacco, expanding nicotine smokers addicted to nicotine and using tobacco products.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Inhalants from Tobacco Burning: Tar and Particulate Emissions
    Scientific African 1 (2018) e0 0 0 04 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Scientific African journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/sciaf Environmental inhalants from tobacco burning: Tar and particulate emissions ∗ Audriy Jebet a, Joshua K. Kibet a, , Thomas Kinyanjui a, Vincent O. Nyamori b a Department of Chemistry, Egerton University, PO Box 536 -20115, Egerton, Kenya b School of Chemistry and Physics, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Westville Campus, Private Bag X54001, Durban 4000, South Africa a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: Cigarette smoking is credited for decreasing the world population annually by about 1%. Received 1 June 2018 This paper therefore explores the carcinogenic and mutagenic residue (tar), and particu- Revised 21 July 2018 late matter from the thermal degradation of tobacco cigarettes coded, SPM and ES1, at Accepted 31 August 2018 a residence time of 2.0 s at 1 atm. This study was carried out in the temperature range 20 0–60 0 °C with nitrogen as the pyrolysis gas. Field emission gun scanning electron mi- Keywords: croscope was used to image the nature of particulate emissions from tobacco smoke. It Carcinogenic was shown that tobacco smoke particulates are ultrafine; ∼22 and 28 nm for SPM and Cigarette smoking ES1 cigarettes respectively. Particle deposition fraction in the human lung and pulmonary Particulate matter lobes was simulated using the Multipath Particle Deposition (MPPD) model. The ultrafine Tar particulates if inhaled are grave precursors for various respiratory health ailments. Maxi- Tobacco mum tar yield was produced at ∼400 °C.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Any Type of Tobacco Product Safe?
    cancer.org | 1.800.227.2345 Is Any Type of Tobacco Product Safe? There is no safe form of tobacco. Staying tobacco free is the best way to protect your health. Tobacco hurts and kills people. In fact, smoking causes about 1 in 5 deaths in the United States. There are many forms of tobacco on the market, and people often think some forms are safe and don’t cause health problems. This isn’t true. Other tobacco products, like e-cigarettes, hookahs, edibles, heat-not-burn cigarettes, and smokeless tobacco, contain some of the same chemicals as regular combustible cigarettes. It's important to know that even though e-cigarettes do not contain tobacco, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) classifies them as "tobacco products." Regular (combustible) cigarettes Regular cigarettes, called combustible cigarettes, contain tobacco, added chemicals, a filter, and a paper covering. People who smoke them expose themselves to over 7,000 chemicals1 when they inhale the smoke from their cigarettes. People around them are also exposed to the same chemicals through secondhand smoke. Cigarette smoking accounts for almost all tobacco-related illnesses and deaths in the United States. Light, hand-rolled, natural, or herbal cigarettes Some people believe that “light” and “low-tar” cigarettes have lower health risks. But studies have shown that the risk of serious health effects2 is not lower in light or low-tar 1 ____________________________________________________________________________________American Cancer Society cancer.org | 1.800.227.2345 cigarettes. Because of this, the FDA has banned use of the terms “light,” “mild,” and “low” in any cigarette sales unless the FDA specifically allows it and so far, it hasn’t.
    [Show full text]