2.The Observation Mission

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2.The Observation Mission OBSERVATION MISSION REPORT PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA HELD ON 2 APRIL 2017 Prepared by the Non-Governmental Organisation EUROPE IN LAW ASSOCIATION In the framework of the CITIZEN OBSERVER INITIATIVE YEREVAN ● 2018 OBSERVATION MISSION REPORT PARLIAMENTARY E LECTIONS OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA HELD ON 2 APRIL 2017 Prepared by the Non-Governmental Organisation EUROPE IN LAW ASSOCIATION In the framework of the CITIZEN OBSERVER INITIATIVE YEREVAN ● 2018 Fund ed by the Europ ean Unio n This publication has been produced with the assistance of the European Union. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the Europe in Law Association NGO and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. This Report was produced by the human rights organisation Europe in Law Association in the framework of the Citizen Observer Initiative following and on the basis of the observation mission carried out by Europe in Law Association, the Journalists’ Club ‘Asparez’ and Transparency International Anti-corruption Center. The observation mission was carried out under the project ‘Public Oversight Over 2017 Parliamentary Elections’ funded by the European Union and co-funded by the National Endowment for Democracy, National Democratic Institute and the Embassy of the Kingdom of the Netherlands in Georgia. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the Europe in Law Association and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union, the National Endowment for Democracy, the National Democratic Institute and the Embassy of the Kingdom of the Netherlands in Georgia. The Citizen Observer Initiative was founded in 2013 with a view to overseeing national and local elections and referenda in Armenia and their compliance with domestic law and the international standards of democracy. The website of the Citizen Observer Initiative is https://www.citizenobserver.am/ The website of the Europe in Law Association is http://ela.am 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ACRONYMS .............................................................................. 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................... 7 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................... 9 1. ELECTORAL LEGISLATION ..................................................................11 1.1. The Process of Adoption of the New Electoral Code ......................... 11 1.2. The Main Innovations and Issues of the New Electoral Code ............. 17 2. THE OBSERVATION MISSION ..............................................................22 2.1. The Observation Missions and Observers ...................................... 22 2.2. The Goals of the Observation Mission ............................................ 23 2.3. The Observation Mission and the Methodology Thereof .................. 24 2.4. The Results of the Observation ..................................................... 27 2.4.1. The Election Campaign. (the Problems and Violations Registered in the Period Preceding the E-Day) ............................................ 28 2.4.2. Preparation for Voting .............................................................. 33 2.4.3. The Voting ............................................................................... 34 2.4.4. Summarisation of the Results of the Vote .................................... 39 2.4.5. Violations of General Nature ...................................................... 41 2.4.6. Violations of Observers’ Subjective Rights .................................. 41 2.4.7. Problems/Violations Observed in the Aftermath of Voting ............. 42 2.4.8. Some Data Produced by the COI Analytical Team on the Basis of the Voter Lists ............................................................ 44 2.4.9. Observation of TEC Activities ..................................................... 45 3. ELECTION-RELATED COMPLAINTS ...................................................47 3.1. Brief Summary of the Process of Complaints .................................. 47 3.1.1. On the Legal Standing of the Observation Organisations and Observers .......................................................................... 48 3.1.2. On the Violations of Subjective Electoral Rights of Observers ........ 49 3.1.3. The Delivery of Complaints to TECs and the Process of their Handover ..................................................................... 50 3.1.4. Notices on TEC Sessions and Timelimits for Examining the Complaints ......................................................................... 51 3.1.5. Sessions and Decisions of TECs on the Submitted Complaints ....... 53 3.1.6. On Failure to Examine the Fact of Violations (or Parts Thereof) Raised by the Complaints by the Initiative of TECs ........................ 59 4 3.1.7. On the Obstacles to the Right to Appeal the TEC Decisions ........... 60 3.1.8. The Participation and Interference of the CEC with the Activities of the PECs and TECs: Absence of Independence on the Part of TECs .................................................................. 61 3.1.9. On the Complaints Submitted to the CEC and Examination Thereof ................................................................. 62 3.1.10. On the Claims Submitted to the Administrative Court .................. 66 3.1.11. On Protection of the Rights of the “Journalits’ Club “Asparez”” as a Media Outlet ............................ 66 3.1.12. On the Actions Taken by the Bodies in Charge of Criminal Prosecution/ The Law Enforcement ........................................... 67 3.1.13. On the Application Submitted to the RA Constitutional Court ....... 67 3.1.14. On the Electoral Disputes Initiated by the Organisations Participating in Elections Concerning the Elections and the Electoral Results ..................................................................... 68 3.1.15. April 28, 2017 Decision of the Constitunional Court .................... 70 4. CONCLUSION .....................................................................................72 4.1. Amendments to the Electoral Legislation and Practice, the Effectiveness Thereof .............................................................. 72 4.2. Merger of State Functions and Party Interests/ Use of the Administrative Resources to the Advantage of One Party ................. 74 4.3. Violations of the Formation and Expression of the Free Will of Voters (Oversight over the Participation in and the Process of Voting) ........................................................... 74 4.4. On the Innovations Introduced with the Adoption of the New Electoral Code ............................................................ 78 4.5. On the Institute of Complaints ...................................................... 80 4.6. On the System of Electoral Commissions in Charge of Election Administration and the Role of the CEC ........................................ 81 4.7. The Observation Missions ............................................................. 81 5. RECOMMENDATIONS .........................................................................85 5.1. Ensuring Political Competition ..................................................... 85 5.2. On Electoral Commissions and Election Administration .................. 86 5.3. Accurate Voter Lists ................................................................... 86 5.4. Broader Rights for Observers ..................................................... 87 5.5. Ensuring Effectiveness of Complaints Proccesses ............................ 87 5.6. General Measures ....................................................................... 88 5 LIST OF ACRONYMS ANC Armenian National Congress APP Armenian Peoples’ Party ARF Armenian Revolutionary Federation CC Constitutional Court CEC Central Electoral Commission COI Citizen Observer Initiative EC Electoral Code ELA Europe in Law Association NGO HRD Human Rights Defender JCA Journalists’ Club ‘Asparez’ NGO NA National Assembly NGO Non-Governmental Organisation ODIHR Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights OSCE Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe PAP Prosperous Armenia Party PEC Precinct Electoral Commission RA Republic of Armenia RLP Rule of Law Party RPA Republican Party of Armenia TEC Territorial Electoral Commission TIAC Transparency International Anti-corruption Center NGO 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On 2 April 2017, parliamentary elections were held in Armenia. The territory of the State was divided into 13 constituencies, which, in their turn, were divided into territories apportioned to 38 territorial electoral commissions (hereinafter: TECs) where 2009 polling stations were formed. Four parties and five party alliances stood for elections. In total, the overall number of the proxies representing the parties and party alliances that stood for elections was 22.416. 49 non-governmental organisations monitored the elections with an overall number of observers reaching 28.021. The results of elections were disputed by one party alliance – ANC-APP. On 28.04.2017 the decision of the RA Constitutional Court (hereinafter also: the CC) was pronounced, which along with declaring the results of elections valid, also registered several important findings in the area of ensuring the Armenian citizens’ electoral rights and the development of the electoral system. Three non-governmental organisations monitored the elections to the National Assembly (hereinafter also:
Recommended publications
  • Monitoring of the National Assembly
    Open Society Foundations-Armenia Monitoring of the National Assembly 5th Convocation, 4th session, 3th report (09.09.2013 - 05.12.2013) Mandate Media NGO 1 The views and analyses contained in this report are those of the Mandate Media NGO who is solely responsible for the contents. They reflect the opinions of the authors and are not approved by the Open Society Foundations-Armenia or its board, therefore do not represent the positions and views of the Open Society Foundations- Armenia. The contents of this study do not necessarily coincide with the views of the Open Society Foundations-Armenia. The publication of the reports was made possible through the full financial assistance by the Open Society Foundations-Armenia in the framework of the Mass Media Program. www.parliamentmonitoring.am 2 CONTENTS SESSION IN FIGURES NA FACTIONS /legislative initiatives, level of engagement/ Republican Party of Armenia Prosperous Armenia faction Armenian National Congress Rule of Law faction Armenian Revolutionary Federation faction Heritage faction NA OVERSIGHT Appointment of Prosecutor General Appointment of Head of Control Chamber Approval of Work Plan 2014 for Control Chamber Gas agreements NA LEGISLATIVE ACTIVITY Budget 2014 Deficit increase in state budget 2013 New system of remuneration of public servants Issue of employment Copyright THE NA ETHICS COMMITTEE 3 INTRODUCTION Mandate NGO presents the findings of the monitoring performed over the work of the NA of the 5th convocation in the 4th session. The summary was prepared by putting together the journalistic observations, expert analyses and data generated by the statistical application of the parliamentmonitoring.am website. The report contains 4 sections.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutional Referendum Analysis of the Activities of International
    Constitutional Referendum Analysis of the Activities of International Monitoring Missions Republic of Armenia December 6, 2016 Authors: Sergey Tkachenko, Yelizaveta Rekhtman Citizen Observer Initiative and European Platform for Democratic Elections Regarding the work of international missions and parliamentary delegations for the constitutional referendum in Armenia, we have to mention that this monitoring is based on information obtained from public sources (media: newspapers, websites, television), as well as information obtained from interviews with observers and representatives of organizations and delegations monitoring the referendum as international observers. This monitoring and evaluation of the international missions focuses on the compliance of the missions’ conduct with the principles and standards of international monitoring outlined in the “Declaration of Principles for International Election Observation,” adopted by the UN on October 27, 2005. The declaration was signed by leading international institutions and organizations engaged in international election observation. It is significant that under the Article 29, Part 2 of the Electoral Code of the Republic of Armenia, international organizations, diplomatic and consular missions accredited in the Republic of Armenia, and foreign non-governmental organizations may carry out observation missions only if they have an official invitation to do so. Citizens of the Republic of Armenia cannot be included as observers in the observation missions of international organizations and foreign non-governmental organizations. The following persons and bodies have the right to issue observation mission invitations to individuals and organizations: 1) President of the Republic; 2) President of the National Assembly; 3) Prime Minister; 4) Central Election Commission (CEC). This clause clearly illustrates that the CEC and the leadership of the Republic of Armenia are well aware of the specifics of institutions and organizations that receive such invitations (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    RA Parliamentary Elections April 2, 2017 “Independent Observer” Public Alliance Final Report 2017 RA Parliamentary Elections April 2, 2017 “Independent Observer” Public Alliance Final Report 2017 Editor Artur Sakunts Authors Vardine Grigoryan Anush Hambaryan Daniel Ioannisyan Artur Harutyunyan The observation mission was carried out with the financial assistance of the Council of Europe and European Union, European Endowment for Democracy, Open Society Foundations - Armenia, Sigrid Rausing Trust, Czech Embassy in Armenia and Norwegian Helsinki Committee. The report was produced with the financial assistance of the European Union and Council of Europe. The “Long-term Electoral Assistance to the Election Related Stakeholders in Armenia” Project is funded within European Union and Council of Europe Programmatic Co-operation Framework in the Eastern Partnership Countries for 2015-2017. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to represent the official opinions of the funding organizations. All rights reserved. Contents Introduction ......................................................................................................... 7 Methodology ........................................................................................................ 8 Legislative Framework and Political Context ................................................. 10 Organization of Elections .................................................................................. 18 Electoral Commissions...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Armenian Opposition in Limbo After Government Crackdown
    21 YEAR The #9 Noah’s Ark (1049) 2 March 2015 Published Since 1993 Weekly Newspaper HIGHLIGHTS ÜáÛÛ³Ý î³å³Ý ß³μ³Ã³Ã»ñà (³Ý·É. / ýñ³Ýë.) Armenian opposition in limbo after government crackdown Armenia's major opposition parties remain vague on their immediate steps after Prosperous Armenia (BHK), admit- tedly the most influential of them, came under huge government pressure earlier this month. The BHK led by tycoon Gagik Tsarukyan dramatically toned down its criticism of President Serzh Sargsyan and his government after suffering the consequences of what appeared to be a crackdown unleashed by the head of state. Serzh Sargsyan and senior members of his ruling Republican Party of Armenia (HHK) lashed out at Tsarukyan on February 12 after the BHK leader effectively presented them with an "ulti- matum" - to give up controversial plans for a constitutional reform or face sus- tained street protests seeking to oust the current administration. remarks, calling for "peaceful ways" of is one of the key demands of the HHK for After a number of BHK members settling disputes. The BHK effectively the pressure to stop. were detained on suspicion of "illegally stopped its criticism of the government Meanwhile, the two opposition par- possessing weapons" and the govern- and scheduled a party convention for ties - the Armenian National Congress ment ordered tax inspections of business- March 5. Many political observers expect (HAK) and Heritage - that formed an es owned by Tsarukyan's extended fami- Tsarukyan to step down as chairman of informal coalition
    [Show full text]
  • Rigged Referendum
    FINAL REPORT Observation Mission for the Constitutional Amendments Referendum of the Republic of Armenia on December 6, 2015 Yerevan, 2016 This Report summarizes the observation mission’s findings concerning the organization and administration of the Constitutional Amendments referendum of the Republic of Armenia. The observation mission was conducted by the Citizen Observer Initiative and the European Platform for Democratic Elections (EPDE), with the support of the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), European Endowment for Democracy (EED), the Embassy of Federal Republic of Germany in Yerevan, and the European Union. The opinions contained in the Report are those of the observation mission and do not reflect the views of the funding organizations. The Citizen Observer Initiative (established in 2013) was formed by 4 non-governmental organizations to observe the national and local elections in Armenia for their compliance with national legislation and international democratic standards. The European Platform for Democratic Elections (established in 2012) is a coalition of 13 non- governmental organizations that aims to assist citizens’ election observation in countries of the Eastern Partnership and the Russian Federation, and to contribute to democratic election processes throughout Europe. 2 CONTENTS ACRONYMS .............................................................................................................................. 5 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights Situation of Lgbt People
    HUMAN RIGHTS SITUATION OF LGBT PEOPLE Annual Review Armenia 2015 Annual Review: Human Rights Situation of LGBT People in Armenia, 2015 Published in Armenia (May, 2016) By Public Information Need of Knowledge NGO With funding provided by the Sigrid Rausing Trust Introduction 2015 was a regressive year for LGBT people’s rights in Armenia, since the newly accepted Constitution restricted marriage as a union only between a man and a woman. The issue of same-sex marriage was brought up in a broad manner during debates about the new Constitution, when homophobic political blocs accused authorities of paving the way for same-sex marriages with the new Constitution, which resulted in the redefining of the article on marriage so that homosexual people would not have the possibility to marry. When the “Rainbow” forum took place for the first time in Armenia, and a photograph fea- turing some of the participants was published, a new wave of hatred arose against LGBT people and their allies. Hatred against LGBT people increased so much that the US Embas- sy, the office of the United Nations in Armenia, and Frontline Defenders all expressed their concerns in public statements. 2015 saw no changes in the state’s or wider society’s attitude toward LGBT people. The dissemination of derogatory and malicious information about LGBT people, discrimination, violence and calls for violence, and the spreading of hate speech through the media and online networks all had a continuous nature in 2015. 2015 was also marked by the first-ever outing of an anti-LGBT political figure in Armenia, after it was publicly revealed that a well-known homophobic figure is in fact homosexual.
    [Show full text]
  • Armenia, 2016 and 2018
    Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization 26: 4 (Fall 2018): pp. 483-508. MY STEP ASIDE FROM SASNA TSRER: THE DYNAMICS OF PROTEST COALITIONS IN ARMENIA, 2016 AND 2018 NIKOLAI SILAEV MGIMO IVAN FOMIN NATIONAL RESEARCH UNIVERSITY HIGHER SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS Abstract: This article is devoted to the comparison of two Armenian protest coalitions: the 2016 coalition of Sasna Tsrer supporters and Nikol Pashinyan’s My Step coalition of 2018. The analysis shows that Pashinyan’s coalition, unlike the coalition of Sasna Tsrer supporters, was not a liberal-nationalist alliance, but rather a liberal- bureaucratic one. This difference turns out to be crucial, as the Sasna Tsrer polemic was heavily polarized by the clash between the statist and counter-statist frames of the Armenian nation, with none of the sides possessing enough symbolic or political resources to win. The generally successful outcome of Pashinyan’s protest can thus be explained by the fact that it was not so strongly framed by a counter-statist understanding of the Armenian nation. n recent years, Armenia has experienced a series of mass political and Isocial protests.1 In the Million Mask March of 2013, large numbers of anti-government protesters rallied in the streets of Yerevan and clashed 1 The research was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (grant project N 17-03-12024, “Eurasia Index—Information Analysis System”). Nikolai Silaev is Senior Research Fellow at MGIMO, Moscow, Russia. Contact: nikolai. [email protected]. Ivan Fomin is Associate Professor at National Research University Higher School of Economics and Research Fellow at INION RAN, Moscow, Russia.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Findings of Mass Media Monitoring in Armenia
    REPORT ON FINDINGS OF MASS MEDIA MONITORING IN ARMENIA Monitoring has been done by the team of the Analytical Centre on Globalization and Regional Cooperation (ACGRC), Yerevan, Republic of Armenia www.acgrc.am CONTENT I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................ 2 II. TERMINOLOGY AND ABBREVIATIONS USED ................................................................................... 3 III. MONITORING METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................... 4 IV. MONITORING OF TV PROGRAMS ........................................................................................................ 5 4.1. “Time will show” .................................................................................................................................................. 5 4.2. “60 minutes” ....................................................................................................................................................... 13 4.3. “Evening with Vladimir Solovyov” .............................................................................................................. 22 4.4. “Countdown” ....................................................................................................................................................... 29 V. SPECIAL OVERVIEW ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]