DOCSLIB.ORG

On the Government of Canada Moratorium on Offshore Oil and Gas Activities in the Queen Charlotte Region British Columbia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
On the Government of Canada Moratorium on Offshore Oil and Gas Activities in the Queen Charlotte Region British Columbia Report of the Public Review Panel on the Government of Canada Moratorium on Offshore Oil and Gas Activities in the Queen Charlotte Region British Columbia Prepared for the Minister of Natural Resources Canada 29 October 2004 National Library of Canada Cataloguing in Publication Report of the Public Review Panel on the Government of Canada Moratorium on Offshore Oil and Gas Activities in the Queen Charlotte Region British Columbia Catalogue No. M4-13/2004E ISBN 0-662-38469-5 Issued by Natural Resources Canada Issued in French under title: Rapport du Comité d’examen public relativement au moratoire du gouvernement du Canada visant les activités pétrolières et gazières extracôtières dans la région de la Reine-Charlotte, en Colombie-Britannique © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2004 Panel: Roland Priddle, Chair Don Scott, Member Diana Valiela, Member Panel Support: Scott Gedak Kate Glover Ron Broadhead Deborah Imhoff Rachel Kowbell Lesley Taylor Marly Wietzke The opinions expressed in this report are those of the Public Review Panel to provide advice to the Minister of Natural Resources Canada. They are not necessarily the opinion or policy of Natural Resources Canada. 29 October 2004 The Honourable R. John Efford Minister of Natural Resources Canada 580 Booth Street Ottawa, Ontario Canada K1A 0E4 Review of the British Columbia Offshore Oil and Gas Moratorium Phase 2, Public Hearings The Public Review Panel is pleased to submit the attached report pursuant to the Terms of Reference given to the Panel by Natural Resources Canada. The Public Review Panel, Roland Priddle Don Scott Diana Valiela Chair Member Member ABSTRACT BACKGROUND The Public Review Panel (the Panel) was established to hold public hearings to obtain the views of British Columbians on matters relevant to the federal moratorium on oil and gas activities, focusing on the Queen Charlotte Region (QCR). The Panel’s public process took place between January and August 2004. The Panel’s Terms of Reference (ToR) require it to submit a report to the Minister of Natural Resources Canada, which is to outline the work carried out, summarize the views of participants, provide the Panel’s evaluation of those views and present its conclusions and recommendations. THE WORK CARRIED OUT Section 1 describes how, starting in January 2004, the Panel held planning meetings in communities most likely to be affected, to provide information on the Panel’s process and to receive input to it. The public process consisted of oral presentations at hearings in ten different locations and written submissions from all of B.C. Oral presentations and written submissions were given equal weight. In indicating relative support for views and issues, the Panel conducted a “head count”. Each of the following was considered a single submission: an oral presentation; a written submission including emails; a letter; and each signature on a ballot, petition or letter. Where a participant contributed through more than one submission, these were collectively considered a single submission. The Panel concluded the public phase of its work in August 2004 by receiving written comments on the information previously submitted. THE VIEWS SUMMARIZED Section 2 gives an impression of the views of British Columbians who took part in the Panel’s process, although the only definitive record is the 22 volumes of hearing transcripts and 13 volumes of written submissions. Overall, 75% of all participants wish to keep the moratorium and 23% wish to lift it. The data are broken down by each of three geographical areas of B.C., namely the QCR, other coastal areas (essentially central and southern Vancouver Island including Victoria and the mainland south coast including Vancouver), and other communities in B.C. (essentially all of non-coastal B.C.). Table 2-1 displays the views of all participants. Table 2-2 shows the breakdown between individuals and participants other than individuals. Table 2-3 shows the positions of four groups, namely First Nations, environmental groups, local governments and business interests. There are differences in views as between individuals and among groups by geographical areas. Narrative summaries, necessarily selective, are provided of views heard at each hearing location and of written submissions by each of the three geographical areas. A majority of participants focused on matters of particular concern to them and the major issues raised, for example environmental effects and First Nations matters, are summarized from presentations and submissions under twelve headings in Section 3. ii Report of the Public Review Panel THE VIEWS EVALUATED Section 4 evaluates the views first in general terms; second, in relation to considerations consistent with the Cabinet Directive on Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA); and third, in relation to seven considerations consistent with the principles of Canada’s Oceans Strategy, in both cases as set out in the Panel’s ToR. CONCLUSIONS PRESENTED The Panel concludes in Section 5 that the strongly held and vigorously polarized views it received do not provide a ready basis for any kind of public policy compromise at this time in regard to keeping or lifting the moratorium. It formed the impression that there had been little recent dialogue among stakeholders and that increasing this dialogue could be helpful. The need to address First Nations interests and concerns was the major area of near consensus. Ecosystem protection was a widely shared priority, but there is fundamental disagreement on how it could best be achieved: by keeping the moratorium, or by lifting it and relying on a modern regulatory regime. There was near consensus among participants that there are significant information gaps regarding biophysical data and environmental and socio-economic impacts information for the QCR, were oil and gas activities to proceed. However, participants wishing to keep the moratorium consider it unsafe to lift the moratorium prior to filling those gaps, while participants wishing to lift the moratorium are of the view that the only way to fill those gaps is to lift the moratorium. Information gathering and consensus building activities would serve to reduce areas of disagreement. RECOMMENDATIONS The Panel in Section 6 sets out for the Government of Canada’s consideration options ranging from: keeping the moratorium (Option 1), which would be supported by 75% of those who took part in its process; to keeping the moratorium or deferring the decision on it while undertaking a suite of activities and taking a decision at a future time (Option 2); to lifting the moratorium and undertaking a suite of activities prior to accepting any oil and gas activity applications (Option 3); and to lifting the moratorium (Option 4) which would be supported by 23% of participants. The Panel had not specifically asked participants for views on Options 2 and 3, where the issues in regard to doing further work include: the activities to be pursued; the parties to be involved; and the process for that involvement. In addition to considering these options, the Panel considers that any further studies related to the moratorium should give particular attention to the following matters: environmental effects; fisheries; information issues; technology; hydrocarbon resources; regulatory regime; protected areas; alternative energy sources; the Kyoto Protocol; cultural values; and social and economic impacts. The need to address First Nations concerns is of central importance. Report of the Public Review Panel iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract 1. Introduction ............................................................................................. 1 1.1 Acknowledgements ................................................................................... 1 1.2 Overview.................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Background................................................................................................ 1 1.4 Public Review Panel Process ................................................................... 2 1.5 Concerns about the Public Hearings (Phase 2) of the Public Review of the Moratorium................................................. 7 2. Views of British Columbians ................................................................. 8 2.1 Overall Summary of Views....................................................................... 8 2.2 Queen Charlotte Region ......................................................................... 11 2.2.1 Queen Charlotte City Hearing ................................................... 11 2.2.2 Village of Masset Hearing ......................................................... 14 2.2.3 Prince Rupert Hearing ............................................................... 17 2.2.4 Kitkatla Hearing ......................................................................... 22 2.2.5 Kitimat Hearing .......................................................................... 24 2.2.6 Bella Coola Hearing................................................................... 27 2.2.7 Alert Bay Hearing ...................................................................... 30 2.2.8 Port Hardy Hearing .................................................................... 32 2.2.9 Written Submissions From the QCR......................................... 38 2.2.10 Oil and Gas Interest Owners ..................................................... 40 2.3 Other Coastal Areas ...............................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Read the Fall 2015 CUPE
    NEW EXECUTIVE | LIBRARY SAFETY | FIGHTING BLINDNESS | PARAMEDICS WIN GOLD PUBLIC FALL 2015 EMPLOYEE OUR TIME HAS COME TOGETHER, WE CAN HELP ELECT CANADA’S FIRST NDP GOVERNMENT LEADINGUS MARK HANCOCK, PRESIDENT “Getting more people to exercise their right to vote is the first step to defeating the Conservatives and electing a truly progressive, NDP government for the first time in Canadian history." Voter turnout will make the difference OCTOBER 19: YOUR DATE WITH A BALLOT BOX — AND HISTORY I’m going to start this column with some math. Maybe not my strongest suit — anymore — but these numbers pretty much speak for themselves. 14 / 6,201 / 9.4 million / 1 OK, maybe these numbers need a little help speaking for ACTIVIST CHAMPION The right-wing government of themselves. Stephen Harper can be defeated if we all work together, 14: That’s how many seats Stephen Harper and the says retiring NDP MP Libby Davies (Vancouver East). Davies, seen here at Convention with Mark Hancock, Conservatives needed to gain in the 2011 election to win a received a standing ovation from delegates after a stirring majority government. video tribute to her decades of progressive activism. 6,201: That’s the total number of votes those 14 seats were won by. Of all the areas that Harper has cut, very few things make me 9.4 million: That’s the number of eligible Canadian voters who as angry as his treatment of our veterans. It’s one thing to send didn’t vote in 2011. our men and women in the armed forces off to war — whether we 1: That's how many elections we are from an NDP government.
    [Show full text]
  • From: Rol Fieldwalker [<Email Address Removed>] Sent: March 9, 2016 8
    From: Rol Fieldwalker [<email address removed>] Sent: March 9, 2016 8:27 PM To: Pacific Northwest LNG / GNL Pacific Northwest (CEAA/ACEE) Subject: *****SPAM***** Re: Pacific Northwest LNG on Lelu Island As any grade 3 student will tell you, by now we all know all the reasons we have to stop using fossil fuel. Communities that are facing the possibility of the end of their way of life are not looking to negotiate a better deal~ whether in the form of local jobs,higher royalties, or better safety standards. More and more communities are simply saying"NO". no to the pipeline, no to fracking, no to the export terminal,no to Arctic drilling, no to the coal trains, no to the oil trains.... neither here nor anywhere else. In other words... no new carbon frontiers. The Lax Kw'alaams First Nation already voted 100% against this project in May, despite an offer of $1.4 billion from Petronas. The Lelu Island Declaration was signed by First Nations leaders from across the Skeena watershed, as well as Grand Chief Stewart Philip of the Union of BC Indian Chiefs, MLAs Jennifer Rice, Doug Donaldson, and Robin Austin, and MP Nathan Cullen, to protect the proposed site – and its salmon – from LNG development. Lelu Island has been occupied by Lax Kw'alaams members since August 2015, who have been working to prevent further work on the rejected project. Madii Lii territory, which the fracked gas pipeline would pass through on the way to Lelu, has been closed to pipeline development by Luutkudziiwus people since Aug.
    [Show full text]
  • LIST of YOUR MLAS in the PROVINCE of BRITISH COLUMBIA As of April 2021
    LIST OF YOUR MLAS IN THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA As of April 2021 NAME RIDING CAUCUS Bruce Banman Abbotsford South BC Liberal Party Michael de Jong, Q.C. Abbotsford West BC Liberal Party Pam Alexis Abbotsford-Mission BC NDP Roly Russell Boundary-Similkameen BC NDP Janet Routledge Burnaby North BC NDP Hon. Anne Kang Burnaby-Deer Lake BC NDP Hon. Raj Chouhan Burnaby-Edmonds BC NDP Hon. Katrina Chen Burnaby-Lougheed BC NDP Coralee Oakes Cariboo North BC Liberal Party Lorne Doerkson Cariboo-Chilcotin BC Liberal Party Dan Coulter Chilliwack BC NDP Kelli Paddon Chilliwack-Kent BC NDP Doug Clovechok Columbia River-Revelstoke BC Liberal Party Fin Donnelly Coquitlam-Burke Mountain BC NDP Hon. Selina Robinson Coquitlam-Maillardville BC NDP Ronna-Rae Leonard Courtenay-Comox BC NDP Sonia Furstenau Cowichan Valley BC Green Party Hon. Ravi Kahlon Delta North BC NDP Ian Paton Delta South BC Liberal Party G:\Hotlines\2021\2021-04-14_LIST OF YOUR MLAS IN THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA.docx Hon. Mitzi Dean Esquimalt-Metchosin BC NDP Jackie Tegart Fraser-Nicola BC Liberal Party Peter Milobar Kamloops-North Thompson BC Liberal Party Todd Stone Kamloops-South Thompson BC Liberal Party Ben Stewart Kelowna West BC Liberal Party Norm Letnick Kelowna-Lake Country BC Liberal Party Renee Merrifield Kelowna-Mission BC Liberal Party Tom Shypitka Kootenay East BC Liberal Party Hon. Katrine Conroy Kootenay West BC NDP Hon. John Horgan Langford-Juan de Fuca BC NDP Andrew Mercier Langley BC NDP Megan Dykeman Langley East BC NDP Bob D'Eith Maple Ridge-Mission BC NDP Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Report of Debates (Hansard)
    First Session, 42nd Parliament OFFICIAL REPORT OF DEBATES (HANSARD) Monday, March 1, 2021 Afernoon Sitting Issue No. 16 THE HONOURABLE RAJ CHOUHAN, SPEAKER ISSN 1499-2175 PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Entered Confederation July 20, 1871) LIEUTENANT-GOVERNOR Her Honour the Honourable Janet Austin, OBC First Session, 42nd Parliament SPEAKER OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Honourable Raj Chouhan EXECUTIVE COUNCIL Premier and President of the Executive Council ............................................................................................................... Hon. John Horgan Minister of Advanced Education and Skills Training...........................................................................................................Hon. Anne Kang Minister of Agriculture, Food and Fisheries......................................................................................................................Hon. Lana Popham Attorney General and Minister Responsible for Housing .............................................................................................Hon. David Eby, QC Minister of Children and Family Development ....................................................................................................................Hon. Mitzi Dean Minister of State for Child Care......................................................................................................................................Hon. Katrina Chen Minister of Citizens’ Services.....................................................................................................................................................Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • [email protected]
    Honorific First Name Last Name Riding Party email Mr Michael de Jong, Q.C Abbotsford West Liberal [email protected] Honourable Anne Kange Burnaby-Deer Lake NDP [email protected] Honourable Raj Chouhan Burnaby-Edmonds NDP [email protected] Dan Coulter Chilliwack NDP [email protected] Doug Clovechok Columbia River-Revelstoke Liberal [email protected] Honourable Mitzi Dean Esquimalt-Metchosin NDP [email protected] Peter Milobar Kamloops-North Thompson Liberal [email protected] Mike Bernier Peace River South Liberal [email protected] Honourable Nicholas Simons Powell River-Sunshine Coast NDP [email protected] Honourable Nathan Cullen Stikine NDP [email protected] Garry Begg Surrey-Guildford NDP [email protected] Honourable Harry Bains Surrey-Newton NDP [email protected] Honourable Bruce Ralston Q.C. Surrey-Whalley NDP [email protected] Honourable George Chow Vancouver-Fraserview NDP [email protected] Mr Bruce Banman Abbotsford South Liberal [email protected] Todd Stone Kamloops-South Thompson Liberal [email protected] Bob D'Eith Maple Ridge-Mission NDP [email protected] Jennifer Rice North Coast NDP [email protected] Henry Yao Richmond South Centre NDP [email protected] Trevor Halford Surrey-White Rock Liberal [email protected] Pam Alexis Abbotsford-Mission NDP [email protected] Roly Russell Boundary-Similkameen NDP [email protected] Coralee Oakes Cariboo
    [Show full text]
  • News Release
    June 29, 2016 Standing Committee on International Trade 6th Floor 131 Queen Street House of Commons Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A6 via email: [email protected] Dear Committee Members: In recent months, there has been a great deal of debate about the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP) and what it means for Canada. The federal government has committed to a study of the agreement’s potential impacts on the Canadian economy; however, to date nothing has been made public, and we have been told no such study yet exists. How can the government possibly sign onto a massive international trade agreement without knowing the impacts it will have, or the potential consequences for the Canadian economy, the public and the environment? In fact, it would be irresponsible to proceed in this way. A genuine and independent economic impact analysis that considers all the implications of this agreement should be mandatory. Possibly one of the reasons for this failure to do an impact study is that the government knows full well that any benefits from the TPP will be marginal at best, while the damage done will be serious. A 2016 study from the C.D. Howe Institute predicts that the macroeconomic impact of the TPP on the Canadian economy would be a mere 0.068% growth in GDP by 2035. Perhaps even more interesting is that the study predicts only a 0.026% drop in GDP by 2035 if Canada does not ratify the TPP. This mirrors the recent US International Trade Commission’s study that showed that the TPP will increase the US trade deficit and will have almost no positive impact on the US economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Report of Debates (Hansard)
    First Session, 42nd Parliament OFFICIAL REPORT OF DEBATES (HANSARD) Monday, April 12, 2021 Morning Sitting Issue No. 43 THE HONOURABLE RAJ CHOUHAN, SPEAKER ISSN 1499-2175 PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Entered Confederation July 20, 1871) LIEUTENANT-GOVERNOR Her Honour the Honourable Janet Austin, OBC First Session, 42nd Parliament SPEAKER OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Honourable Raj Chouhan EXECUTIVE COUNCIL Premier and President of the Executive Council ............................................................................................................... Hon. John Horgan Minister of Advanced Education and Skills Training...........................................................................................................Hon. Anne Kang Minister of Agriculture, Food and Fisheries......................................................................................................................Hon. Lana Popham Attorney General and Minister Responsible for Housing .............................................................................................Hon. David Eby, QC Minister of Children and Family Development ....................................................................................................................Hon. Mitzi Dean Minister of State for Child Care......................................................................................................................................Hon. Katrina Chen Minister of Citizens’ Services.....................................................................................................................................................Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Enbridge Profile
    Out on the Tar Sands Mainline Mapping Enbridge’s Web of Pipelines A Corporate Profile of Pipeline Company Enbridge By Richard Girard, Polaris Institute Research Coordinator with Contributions from Tanya Roberts Davis Out on the Tar Sands Mainline: Mapping Enbridge’s Dirty Web of Pipelines May 2010 (partially updated, March 2012). The Polaris Institute The Polaris Institute is a public interest research and advocacy organization based in Canada. Since 1999 Polaris has been dedicated to developing tools and strategies for civic action on major public policy issues, including energy security, water rights and free trade. Polaris Institute 180 Metcalf Street, Suite 500 Ottawa, ON K2P 1P5 Phone : 613-237-1717 Fax: 613-237-3359 Email: [email protected] www.polarisinstitute.org For more information on the Polaris Institute’s energy campaign please visit www.tarsandswatch.org Table of Contents Foreword ......................................................................................................................... iv Executive Summary ..........................................................................................................1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................3 1. Organizational Profile ...................................................................................................5 1.1 Enbridge’s Business Structure ....................................................................................5 1.1.1 Liquids
    [Show full text]
  • RECEIVED MAY O 4 2012 CITY MANAGE"'I Ofl'ice CITY of PRINCE GEORGE
    House of Commons Chambre des communes RECEIVED MAY O 4 2012 CITY MANAGE"'I OFl'ICE CITY OF PRINCE GEORGE April 30, 2012 Mayor Shari Green City of Prince George 1100 Patricia Boulevard Prince George, BC V2L3V9 Dear Mayor Green, It is with great sadness that we learned the tragic news of the explosion at the Lakeland Mills in Prince George this past Monday. We deeply regret to hear of the deaths of two workers from the mill. Our thoughts are with the entire community, particularly with the families of those who perished and the twenty two who were injured. At times filled with grief such as these, it is when we most rely on the strength and love of our community. As part of the greater British Columbian community we would like to offer our support. We are glad to hear that WorkSafeBC will be looking into this and will continue the call for action to prevent tragedies like this in the future. Bums Lake suffered a similar tragedy at Babine Forest Products early this year. The courage and commitment of that community to support the families most impacted is truly inspiring. We offered support in that tragedy and will continue to work with the mayor, the union and the company. Once again, we offer our deepest condolences to the families, friends, and co-workers at Lakeland Mills and to the entire community of Prince George. Sincerely, /~~ ~~ Jean Crowder, MP Alex Atamanenko, MP Don Davies, MP Nanaimo-Cowichan BC Southern Interior Vancouver-Kingsway ~\: (~\,~ }.;, hbv;i):w ;q Nathan Cullen, MP Libby Davies, MP Fin Donnelly, MP Skeena-Bulkley Valley Vancouver East New Westminster-Coquitlam and Port Moody I,_,{---: )-~- ~ v--­ lf,,.j~Q.~01'\ ll r~\L- ' Randall Garrison, MP Peter Julian, MP Esquimalt-Juan de Fuca Jasbir Sandhu, MP Burnaby-New Westminster Surrey North - ~ :J)n ~Ssi.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Smithers
    TOWN OF SMITHERS Minutes of the Regular Meeting of Council held in Council Chambers, 1027 Aldous Street, Smithers, B.C., on Tuesday, October 11, 2005, at 7:30 p.m. Council Present: Staff Present: Jim Davidson, Mayor Wallace Mah, Corporate Administrator/CAO Norm Adomeit, Councillor Carlos Felip, DCAO/Director of Planning Cathryn Bucher, Councillor Clair Lee, Corporate Administrative Assistant Cress Farrow, Councillor Leslie Ford, Financial Administrator/Collector Bill Goodacre, Councillor Mark Allen, Director of Development Services Andy Howard, Councillor Darcey Kohuch, Director of Operational Services Marilyn Stewart, Councillor. Keith Stecko, Fire Chief Kelly Zacharias, Airport Manager/Deputy Fire Chief Angela Belsham, Recreation Coordinator Penny Goodacre, Recording Secretary. Media Present: C. Lester, BVLD, and T. Hunt, The Interior News. Public Present: J. LeClair, R. McNaughton, M. Warmerdam, C. Warmerdam, C. Northrup, and T. Barker. CALL TO ORDER 1. Mayor Davidson called the meeting to order (7:32 p.m.). APPROVAL OF AGENDA (including Supplemental Items) 1A. Farrow/Howard 05.0746 THAT Council approves the agenda, and the following supplemental items for AGENDA discussion later in the meeting (under Section 14): APPROVAL 1A-1 News Release dated October 7, 2005, from the Omineca Beetle Action Coalition entitled “OBAC Interim Executive Have First Meeting Since Funding Announced” (0360-20). 1A-2 Email dated October 11, 2005, from M. Hanson, Communications Officer, New Democrat Official Opposition, requesting that Council submit a written request to the BC Utilities Commission for public hearings regarding the sale of Terasen Gas to Kinder Morgan (0230-30). CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. PUBLIC HEARING 2-1 “Highway Closure and Dedication Removal (Lane in Block 19, Plan 1076, HEARING Section 2, Township 1A, Range 5, Coast Range 5 Land District) Bylaw No.
    [Show full text]
  • September 3, 2015
    REGIONAL DISTRICT OF BULKLEY-NECHAKO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING Thursday, September 3, 2015 PRESENT: Chairperson Bill Miller Directors Taylor Bachrach Eileen Benedict Shane Brienen Mark Fisher Dwayne Lindstrom Rob MacDougall Rob Newell – arrived at 11:34 a.m. Mark Parker Jerry Petersen Darcy Repen Luke Strimbold Gerry Thiessen Director s Tom Greenaway, Electoral Area “C” (Fort St. James Rural) Absent Thomas Liversidge, Village of Granisle Alternate Bob Hughes, Electoral Area “C” (Fort St. James Rural) Directors Linda McGuire, Village of Granisle Staff Gail Chapman, Chief Administrative Officer Janine Dougall, Director of Environmental Services Jason Llewellyn, Director of Planning – arrived at 12:20 p.m., left at 12:48 p.m., returned at 12:54 p.m. Wendy Wainwright, Executive Assistant Other Nathan Cullen, MP Skeena Bulkley Valley, New Democratic Party – arrived 10:37 a.m., left at 12:20 p.m. CALL TO ORDER Chair Miller called the meeting to order at 10:33 a.m. AGENDA & Moved by Alternate Director McGuire SUPPLEMENTARY AGENDA Seconded by Director Brienen C.W.2015-6-1 “That the Agenda of the Regional District of Bulkley-Nechako Committee of the Whole meeting of September 3, 2015 be approved; and further that the Supplementary Agenda be received.” (All/Directors/Majority) CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY MINUTES Committee of the Whole Moved by Director MacDougall Minutes – June 11, 2015 Seconded by Director Petersen C.W.2015-6-2 “That the Committee of the Whole meeting minutes of June 11, 2015 be received.” (All/Directors/Majority) CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
    [Show full text]
  • Speaker Abstracts
    Nov. 14-16, 2012 Smithers, B.C. SPEAKER ABSTRACTS Thanks for attending. The Bulkley Valley Research Centre would like to thank the following conference sponsors: Please visit our poster session and the following exhibitors, downstairs in the Yellowhead Room. Your Local Partner Since 1910 Engineering Surveying Civil/Geotech Environmental Materials Testing LiDAR 3907 Fourth Ave., Smithers, BC | 250.847.4040 | McElhanney.com SPEAKERS 1 Sybille Haeussler and Don Morgan 2 David de Wit 3 Doug Donaldson 4 Kelly Giesbrecht 5 James Cuell 6 Jim Pojar 7 Nathan Cullen 8 Taylor Bachrach 9-10 Daryl Hanson and Andrea Kosalko 11 Kelly McCormack 12-14 Danielle Smyth, Phil Burton and Michael McDiarmid 15-16 Rick Budhwa and Karl Sturmanis 17 David Thompson 18-20 Aaron Hill and Viorel Popescu 21 Lorne Greig 22 Chief Andrew George 23 Harry Nelson 24 Dave Daust 25 Terry Antoniuk 26 Leah Malkinson 27-28 Jessica Clogg 29 Dave Hatler 30-31 Servaas Mes 32 Byng Giraud 33 Mike Bernier 34-35 Tara Marsden and Fred Philpot 36-37 Stephanie Clarke 38-39 Marvin Eng 39 Terry Glavin 40 James Casey 41 Ben Heemskerk 42 Greg Knox 43 Mike Ambach 44-46 Panelists and moderators - 1 - Welcome and opening remarks Sybille Haeussler, President Bulkley Valley Research Centre Sybille Haeussler is a Bulkley Valley Research Centre founding board member and currently serves as board president and chair. She is a professional forester and research scientist who has made her home in the Bulkley Valley since 1979. Sybille’s work addresses the dynamics, diversity and restoration of terrestrial ecosystems in northern B.C.
    [Show full text]