East West Link Board of Inquiry New Zealand

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

EAST WEST LINK BOARD OF INQUIRY NEW ZEALAND TRANSPORT AGENCY BUNDLE OF AUTHORITIES FOR CLOSING SUBMISSION 1. Affco New Zealand Ltd v Napier City Council, Environment Court, Wellington, 4/11/2004, W082/2004 2. Batten v Rodney District Council, Environment Court, Auckland, 6/8/2009, A066/09 3. Beadle v Minister of Corrections A074/02 (EnvC) 4. Bleakley v Environmental Risk Management Authority [2001] 3 NZLR 213 (HC) 5. Director-General of Conservation v Marlborough DC W089/97 (EnvC) 6. Final Report and Decision of the Board of Inquiry into the Upper North Island Grid Upgrade Project, Ministry for the Environment, Board of Inquiry, 4 September 2009 7. Freda Pene Reweti Whanau Trust v Auckland RC (2004) 11 ELRNZ 235 (EnvC) 8. Greensill v Waikato RC W017/95 (PT) 9. Haddon v Auckland Regional Council A077/93 (PT) 10. Hanton v Auckland City Council [1994] NZRMA 289 11. Hokio Trusts v Manawatu-Wanganui Regional Council [2017] NZHC 1355 12. Kett v Minister for Land Information, AP404/151/00 13. Marr v Bay of Plenty Regional Council [2010] NZEnvC 347 14. Mason-Riseborough v Matamata-Piako District Council (1997) 4 ELRNZ 31 (EnvC) 15. McGuire v Hastings District Council [2002] 2 NZLR 577 16. McQueen v Waikato District Council A45/94 17. Minhinnick v Minister of Corrections A043/04 (EnvC) 18. Ngati Rangi Trust v Manawatu-Wanganui RC EnvC A067/04 19. Norris v Northland Regional Council [2012] NZEnvC 124 20. Orica Mining Services NZ Ltd v Franklin District Council EnvC W032/09 21. Outstanding Landscape Protection Soc Inc v Hastings DC [2008] NZRMA 8 (EnvC) 22. Pierau v Auckland Council [2017] NZEnvC 90 23. Pigeon Bay Aquaculture Ltd v Canterbury Regional Council EnvC C179/03 24. Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society of New Zealand Inc v Buller District Council [2013] NZHC 1324 25. Save Kapiti Inc v New Zealand Transport Agency [2013] NZHC 2014 26. Save Wanaka Lakefront Reserve Inc v Queenstown Lakes District Council [2017] NZEnvC 88 27. Shirley Primary School v Christchurch CC [1999] NZRMA 66 (EnvC) 28. Skyline Enterprises Ltd v Queenstown Lakes District Council [2017] NZEnvC 124 29. Tairua Marine Ltd v Waikato Regional Council (HC) 29/6/2006 (CIV-2005-485-1490) 30. Takamore Trustees v Kapiti Coast District Council [2003] 3 NZLR 496 31. Tram Lease Ltd v Auckland Transport [2015] NZEnvC 137 BF\57246413\4 | Page 1 32. Waikanae Christian Holiday Park v Kapiti Coast DC 27/10/04 (HC) 33. Wanaka Inc v Queenstown Lakes District Council [2015] NZEnvC 139 34. Watercare Services Ltd v Minhinnick [1998] 1 NZLR 294 (CA) 35. Wellington v Franklin District Council A061/2004 36. Western Bay of Plenty District Council v Bay of Plenty Regional Council [2017] NZEnvC 147 37. Wymondley Against the Motorway Action Group Inc v Transit New Zealand [2004] NZRMA 162 BF\57246413\4 | Page 2 .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Kapiti Coast District / [email protected] / P
APRIL 2019 KAPITI COAST DISTRICT WWW.INTEREST.CO.NZ / [email protected] / P. 09 3609670 KAPITI COAST DISTRICT HOME LOAN AFFORDABILITY REPORT April 2019 Home loan affordability is a measure of the proportion of take-home pay that is needed to make the mortgage payment for a typical household. If that is less than 40%, then a mortgage is considered ‘affordable’. The following are typical assessments for households at three stages of home ownership. FIRST HOME BUYERS 25-29 YOUNG FAMILY 30-34 OLDER FAMILY 35-39 First home buyers earn a medi- Young family buyers earn medi- Older family buyers earn medi- an income for their age group, an incomes in their age bracket, an incomes in their age brack- and buy a first quartile house and buy a median house in et, and buy a median house in in their area. Both parties work their area. One partner works their area. Both partners work full-time. half-time. full-time. Mortgage payment as a Mortgage payment as a Mortgage payment as a percentage of the take home pay percentage of the take home pay percentage of the take home pay Take Home April 19 29.7% Take Home April 19 29.2% Take Home Pay Pay Pay April 19 17.6% April 18 30.3% April 18 26.8% $1,517.11 $1,334.99 $1,856.59 April 18 17.1% per Week April 17 26.9% per Week April 17 29.2% per Week April 17 19.4% April 14 - April 14 26.0% April 14 33.3% This report estimates how affordable it would be for a couple This report estimates how affordable it would be for a couple This report estimates how affordable it would be for a couple where both are aged 25–29 and are working full time, to buy a with a young family to move up the property ladder and buy their who are both aged 35-39 and working full time, to move up the home at the lower quartile price in Kapiti Coast District.
[Show full text]
Witness List
List of Witnesses Part One Ronald Henry Abdinor Marketing and Personnel Manager Tai Poutini Polytechnic Graeme John Alexander Building Inspector Buller District Council Terence Neale Archer Manager, Regulatory Services Buller District Council John Stafford Bainbridge Senior Conservation Officer Department of Conservation Rodney George Chambers Development Officer, Coast Care Programme Christchurch City Council Calvin Fraser Cochrane Regional Works Officer Department of Conservation Ian Ross Davidson Finance Officer Department of Conservation Mark Peter Davis Conservancy Mining Officer Department of Conservation Dr Alan Spencer Edmonds Deputy Director General Department of Conservation Kevin James Field Conservation Officer Department of Conservation Lakshman Ravindra Fernando Planning Officer Buller District Council Darren William Gamble Student (Survivor) Tai Poutini Polytechnic William Stuart Gilbertson Chairperson Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society, West Coast Kathryn Helen Groome Senior Conservation Officer, Recreation/Tourism Liaison Department of Conservation Bruce Neville Hamilton Chairperson West Coast Tai Poutini Conservation Board Wayne Douglas Harper Worker Department of Conservation Annabelle Hasselman Recreation Design Planner Department of Conservation Alan Brent Hendrickson Constable New Zealand Police Keith Norman Johnston Executive Manager, Strategic Development Department of Conservation William Ramsay Mansfield Director General of Conservation Ian Scott McClure Human Resources and Administration Manager Department
[Show full text]
Making a Community: Filipinos in Wellington
Making a Community: Filipinos in Wellington September 2017 ISBN 978-0-9941409-4-4 (PDF) Making a Community: Filipinos in Wellington About the Author As an American living in New Zealand, I’ve been observing the debate here on immigration and multiculturalism. I arrived in Wellington last year with my Kiwi husband and three-year old son – and while settling in we’ve spent a lot of time discovering the delights of the city and its people. The experience also gave me some perspective on being a migrant far from home. I have a professional interest in South East Asian history, languages and culture - I just completed a PhD on the subject. I speak some Filipino, and am fascinated by the Philippines’ complex history. One of the major phenomena in the Philippines since the 1970s has been the growth of the global Filipino diaspora. That story has often been full of sadness. So I was intrigued by anecdotes of positivity and success from Wellington. Writing about how the migrant Filipino community has settled in New Zealand has been more than just a research project. It has highlighted how migration plays a role in community building. It also has meaning for me and my family’s future here. I really wanted to share some of the stories that I think reflect successful outcomes from immigration over the past thirty years. By Dr Rebecca Townsend 1 Key Points 1. 2. 3. Filipinos comprise 1 percent of Filipinos are a vital part of Most Filipinos in New Zealand are New Zealand’s population – the New Zealand’s dairy, healthcare, not Overseas Filipino Workers third largest Asian ethnic group construction, nursing, aged care, (OFW).
[Show full text]
Memorandum of Understanding Between
Attachment 1 to Report 06.583 Page 1 of 5 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN CAPITAL AND COAST DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD AND KAPITI COAST DISTRICT COUNCIL, PORIRUA CITY COUNCIL, WELLINGTON CITY COUNCIL, AND WELLINGTON REGIONAL COUNCIL PURPOSE The parties to this Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) share a common obligation to enhance the well being and health of people in Kapiti, Porirua and Wellington, and to work with them in building strong, vibrant and healthy communities. This MoU will assist in achieving the Regional Community Outcome: "Healthy Community" as outlined in the Wellington Regional Strategy. This MoU sets out a process to assist co-operation between the above organisations. It is intended that this MoU will: • ensure that resources (people, funding and materials) are used to improve the well being of the communities in Kapiti, Porirua and Wellington • ensure communication between the organisations is open and timely. PROTOCOLS AND PRINCIPLES • the parties will work together on issues where it is agreed that the population of Kapiti, Porirua and Wellington will benefit from a collaborative approach • the MoU acknowledges each organisation's unique accountability and contribution to shared processes • the parties agree to act in good faith on issues of information and disclosure • the parties agree to work collaboratively in an open and transparent manner • the parties agree to build on work currently undertaken within Kapiti, Porirua and Wellington. • the parties acknowledge the role of Regional Public Health (RPH) in delivering regional public health services, and that this MoU will not preclude the development of such relationships by each party with RPH As signatories of this MoU each party will ensure: • early notification to affected parties through the distribution of draft documentation, of major policy discussions, which may have implications beyond the boundaries of the decision-making party.
[Show full text]
Kapiti Coast District Council and Other Councils, Including Population Forecasts
Housing and Business Development Capacity Assessment Kāpiti Coast District Council November 2019 Housing and Business Land Capacity Assessment 229 230 Housing and Business Land Capacity Assessment Contents Executive Summary 232 5.0 Infrastructure 270 Background 233 5.1 Three Waters 270 Residential demand 233 5.2 Local Road Network 271 Residential capacity 233 5.3 State Highway Network 272 Business demand 234 5.4 Public Transport 272 Business capacity 234 5.5 Open Space 273 Infrastructure capacity 234 5.6 Education 273 1.0 Introduction 237 6.0 Relationship between Housing and Business Land 274 2.0 Existing Policy Context 238 7.0 Monitoring 275 2.1 Kāpiti Coast District Plan 238 7.1 Historic Development Activity 275 2.2 Development Management Strategy 2007 238 7.2 Market Indicators 278 2.3 Infrastructure Strategy 2018-2048 238 7.3 Price Efficiency Indicators 285 2.4 Roads of National Significance and Town Centres Transformation 239 8.0 Conclusion 293 3.0 Residential Demand and Capacity 240 9.0 Next Actions 294 3.1 Historic urban growth and settlement 240 3.2 Current growth and settlement trends 240 3.3 Future Housing Demand 241 3.4 Housing Development Capacity 248 3.5 Housing Feasibility, Realisation and Sufficiency 251 4.0 Business Demand and Capacity 258 4.1 Business Development Context 258 4.2 Current Economic and Business Drivers 259 4.3 Future Business Demand 260 4.4 Business Development Capacity 264 4.5 Business Feasibility, Realisation and Sufficiency 266 Housing and Business Land Capacity Assessment 231 Executive Summary This report presents the results from the Wellington Region Housing and Business Development Capacity Assessment (HBA) for the Kāpiti Coast District Council.
[Show full text]
Come Join Us in “New Zealand's Happiest Place”*
THE BULLER GUIDE TO LIVING WELL Come join us in “New Zealand’s Happiest Place”* * The Happiness of New Zealand Report – UMR Research 2012 Top 10 reasons why people move here • Easy lifestyle and quality of life • We’re kid-safe and family focused • A strong sense of community and caring • So much to see and do right on your doorstep • World-renowned scenery • Get a great house on an average wage • Getting to work, school or play takes just minutes • An unbeatable range of sport and recreation • Great retail, support services and cafes • Great transport links to main centres Click on our interactive menu and links throughout to go directly to the section you would like to see. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 great Housing, Perfect Place Education & Sports, Health and Culture, Relocation reasons Living for the Active Community Recreation, Wellbeing The Arts, Support Intro Essentials Retiree Learning Entertainment Heritage & Useful & Climate contacts SPACE & freedom The Buller district covers Reefton just less than 8600 square – gateway to the Buller from the Lewis Pass route from kilometers with 84% in Christchurch - born from gold in the 1860’s and now a conservation land and National modern goldmining town with a wonderfully preserved Park. All of this wonderful play heritage main street. Entry way to the magnificent Victoria Conservation Park. area for a population of around 10,000 people! Westport Choose your town – – our biggest little town of around 5,500 with all mod cons. The service centre for the Buller sited at the mouth or go country of the Buller River.
[Show full text]
The Case of Kapiti Coast District Council
THE NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL Journal of the New Zealand Medical Association Getting an outdoor smokefree policy: the case of Kapiti Coast District Council Leigh Halkett, George Thomson Abstract Aim To explore how a smokefree parks policy was conceived, accepted and developed by and for Kapiti Coast District Council (KCDC). Method Thirteen people involved in the smokefree parks policy process for KCDC were interviewed in person during November–December 2008. Supporting documentation and websites were accessed and reviewed. Results In September 2008 the KCDC agreed to adopt a smokefree parks and playground policy, following an initiative from a smokefree coalition of several public health organisations. The policy was developed collaboratively by this coalition with input from the council, and was supported by key local organisations. The KCDC appears to have adopted a smokefree outdoor areas (SFOA) policy because of demonstrated public support, the relative simplicity and low cost of the policy, the success of similar policies elsewhere, and because of the alignment with desired community outcomes. The challenges included finding funding and allocating staff time for this project. There were also concerns with how the policy would be enforced. Conclusions A collaborative approach amongst health and community groups for achieving SFOA policies works well. The experience with council SFOA policies has considerable impact on the adoption of similar policies by other councils. To maximise this influence, information about the policies needs to be spread nationally by the health and local government sectors. Legislative efforts to reduce smoking and the exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS) in New Zealand have included the Smoke-free Environments Act 1990 (SEA) and the Smoke-free Environments Amendment Act 2003 (SEAA).
[Show full text]
Regional Waste Strategy for the West Coast
Regional Waste Strategy for the West Coast Prepared by the West Coast Waste Management Working Group 2004 with assistance from the Ministry for the Environment • Adopted by the West Coast Regional Council at its September 2004 Meeting. • Adopted by the Buller District Council at its September 2004 Meeting. • Adopted by the Westland District Council at its November 2004 Meeting. • Adopted by the Grey District Council at its December 2004 Meeting. ii Regional Waste Strategy for the West Coast September 2004 Table of contents 1. Introduction..........................................................................................................1 2. Legislative and policy framework......................................................................3 2.1 Regulatory framework............................................................................................. 3 2.2 Policy ...................................................................................................................... 3 2.2.1 Regional Solid Waste Management Strategy ............................................................3 2.2.2 West Coast Regional Policy Statement.....................................................................4 2.2.3 Regional Plan for Discharges to Land for the West Coast Region.............................5 2.2.4 West Coast Regional Council Contaminated Sites Management Strategy................7 2.2.5 Waste management plans.........................................................................................7 2.2.6 Annual plans
[Show full text]
Part C.10 Landscapes for List of Outstanding Landscapes and the Planning Maps)
APPENDIX 3 Operative Kāpiti Coast District Plan Objectives and Policies Proposed Kāpiti Coast District Plan Objectives and Policies S149(G)3 Key Issues Report – Kāpiti Coast District Council C.1: RESIDENTIAL ZONE C.1 RESIDENTIAL ZONE Over 90% of the district's population live on less than 4% of the land. This land comprises the residential environment. To accommodate this population there has been considerable investment made in buildings, services (water, gas, wastewater disposal) roading and amenity facilities (shops and schools). This represents a significant physical resource which needs to be managed to enable people and communities to meet their needs and to minimise any adverse effects of activities on both the natural and physical environment. The management of this resource can be achieved within the District Plan through controls in the design of subdivision, use and development. The objectives and policies set out below in C.1.1 are intended to address the significant resource management issues identified in B.2. The related subdivision and development issues in B.8 are addressed in C.7. C.1.1 Objectives & Policies OBJECTIVE 1.0 - GENERAL ENSURE THAT THE LOW DENSITY, QUIET CHARACTER OF THE DISTRICT’S RESIDENTIAL ENVIRONMENTS IS MAINTAINED AND THAT ADVERSE EFFECTS ON THE AMENITY VALUES THAT CONSTITUTE THIS CHARACTER AND MAKE THE RESIDENTIAL ENVIRONMENTS SAFE, PLEASANT AND HEALTHY PLACES FOR RESIDENTS ARE AVOIDED, REMEDIED OR MITIGATED. The residential environments within the Kapiti Coast District generally have a low density character, typified by low building heights and density and a high proportion of public and private open space.
[Show full text]
EPA Board of Enquiry Hon Sir John Hanley David Bunting, Environment
EPA Board of Enquiry Hon Sir John Hanley David Bunting, Environment Commissioner Glenice Paine Mark Appledoorn Intro My name is Ruben Blok and I live at 79 Belvedere Ave, Waikanae. I am a Business Intelligence consultant with a private local firm and I create analytic reporting solutions for major private and public sector organisations throughout the Australasia. I am usually not too worried about government decisions but given my field of expertise and what I have witnessed with this project something very wrong is happening here and the information does simply not add up. I oppose the NZTA Makays to Peka Peka proposal and would like to tell you my experience and explain my findings. Lead Up We moved from Auckland to Kapiti (originally to Raumati South) in 2007 to start a family and fell in love with the community and surroundings. The combination of bush, beach, and lifestyle was an easy decision. We heard about KCDCs initial proposal to create a new alternate road and bridge to Waikanae I quite liked the idea. It seems a little crazy that you can almost walk to Waikanae from Paraparaumu Beach faster than you can drive (we tested it the other day). A year or two later we received the notification from NZTA that as part of the Roads of National Significance project they were planning to upgrade the existing SH1 to future proof the national grid. We again quite optimistic when we saw the proposals (WO and EO only) and chose option EO, upgrade the existing SH1, as it had minimal impact on the existing community leaving SH1 as close to its original location as possible.
[Show full text]
MONDAY 17 May TIME Individual/ Orgainisation Speaker for Organisation Submission Number 9:30 A.M
MONDAY 17 May TIME Individual/ Orgainisation Speaker for Organisation Submission Number 9:30 a.m. - 9:45 a.m. 9:45 a.m. - 10:00 a.m. KCA Lyn Sleath 21LTP -12 + 21 10:00 a.m. - 10:15 a.m. Raumati Village Business Association Bede Laracy 21 LTP - 08 10:15 a.m. - 10:30 a.m. John Robinson EHQ - 01 10:30 a.m. - 10:45 a.m. Marco Zeeman EHQ - 10 10:45 a.m. - 11:00 a.m. Georgia Choveaux EHQ - 16 11:00 a.m. - 11:15 a.m. MORNING TEA BREAK 11:15 a.m. - 11:30 a.m. E Tu Otaki Shelley Warwick/someone else 21LTP - 22 11:30 a.m. - 11:45 a.m. KEAG Shelley Warwick/ Ruth Halliday 21 LTP - 23 & 21 LTP - 26 11:45 a.m. - 12:00 p.m. Kapiti College Tony Kane 21LTP74 12:00 p.m. - 12:15 p.m. Waik Community Board James Westbury EHQ - 29 12:15 p.m. - 12:30 p.m. Adrian Gregory EHQ-58 12:30 p.m. - 1:30 p.m. LUNCH BREAK 1:30 p.m. - 1:45 p.m. John Le Harivel EHQ - 13 1:45 p.m. - 2:00 p.m. Peter Ryan EHQ - 09 2:00 p.m. - 2:15 p.m. Nga Manu Matu Booth 21LTP - 11 2:15 p.m. - 2:30 p.m. Kapiti Climate Change Action Dawn Brook 21LTP - 56 2:30 p.m. - 2:45 p.m. Rachel Barwell 21LTP - 54 2:45 p.m. - 3:00 p.m. Shaun Johnson EHQ - 06 3:00 p.m.
[Show full text]
Maritime Contacts
HARBOURMASTERS Port/Region Address and Email Telephone Mobile AUCKLAND Auckland Transport +64 9 362 0397 Private Bag 92250, Auckland 1142 [email protected] Emergency 24 hour Duty Officer + 64 9 362 0397 ext 1 CHATHAM ISLANDS PO Box 24, Chatham Islands 8942 +64 3 305 0033 [email protected] GISBORNE Gisborne District Council 0800 653 800 027 610 3100 PO Box 747, Gisborne 4040 +64 6 867 2049 [email protected] GREYMOUTH Port of Greymouth +64 3 768 5666 33 Lord St, Greymouth 7805 PO Box 382, Greymouth 7840 [email protected] LYTTELTON, Environment Canterbury +64 3 353 9007 TIMARU, AKAROA - PO Box 345, Christchurch 8140 AND KAIKOURA [email protected] 0800 324 636 NAPIER Hawke’s Bay Regional Council +64 6 833 4525 027 445 5592 Private Bag 6006, Napier 4142 [email protected] NELSON Port Nelson, 8 Vickerman Street, Port Nelson +64 3 548 2099 021 072 4667 PO Box 844, Nelson 7040 +64 3 546 9015 [email protected] NORTHLAND Regional Harbourmaster +64 9 470 1200 36 Water Street, Whanga-rei 0110 [email protected] Emergency and 24 hour Duty Officer 0800 504 639 OTAGO Otago Regional Council +64 3 474 0827 027 583 5196 70 Stafford Street, Dunedin 9016 027 587 7708 Private Bag 1954, Dunedin 9054 [email protected] PICTON AND Marlborough District Council +64 3 520 7400 MARLBOROUGH Picton Customer Service Centre 67 High Street, Picton 7220 [email protected] QUEENSTOWN Harbourmasters Office +64 3 442 3445 027 434 5289 AND WANAKA Frankton Marina Queenstown 027 414 2270 PO Box 108, Arrowtown 9351 [email protected] SOUTHLAND Environment Southland +64 3 211 5115 021 673 043 Cnr.
[Show full text]