Dell's $3.9 Billion Perot Gamble

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dell's $3.9 Billion Perot Gamble Sept. 25, 2009 InformationWeekanalytics.com Analytics Alerts Dell’s $3.9 Billion Perot Gamble Contents Dell faces numerous obstacles, including integration 2 Dell’s Perot Bid A $3.9 Billion challenges and wary customers, as it looks Gamble to become a player in the tech services market. 5 Dell’s Acquisition Of Perot Helps Healthcare Push But it’s on the right track. 6 Dell Buys Perot: Told You So! 7 Dell-Perot Cash-Outs And The Media’s ‘Windfall’ Idiocy Dell’s Perot Gamble InformationWeekanalytics.com Analytics Alerts Sept. 22, 2009 Dell’s Perot Bid A $3.9 Billion Gamble By Paul McDougall DELL’S $3.9 BILLION DEAL TO ACQUIRE PEROT SYSTEMS could be a boon to its own sagging fortunes and to business customers looking to implement new architectures like virtu- alization and cloud computing. But the PC and server maker will have to manage thorny inte- gration issues as it absorbs a company known for its rigid, by-the-book culture and reliance on a market-healthcare-where Dell has little experience. On top of these issues, Dell is a relative neophyte when it comes to IT services and M&As. Not that there isn’t a plan. Dell wants to marry its hardware and automation software with Perot’s integration and out- sourcing services so it can offer end-to-end “solutions,” mirror- ing earlier moves by rivals Hewlett-Packard and IBM. The parts are all there-in theory at least. Dell has the iron and applica- tions needed for advanced data centers. It bundles VMware’s View virtual desktop offering Does Perot give Dell with its Latitude and Optiplex [a winning hand? PCs and PowerEdge servers to create an off-the-shelf virtualization package. Dell also has tweaked a line of servers to reduce heat emissions and optimize performance on Microsoft’s cloud-based Azure operating system. For its part, Perot brings integration, deployment, and systems management expertise. It recently launched a cloud integration service, advising customers on cloud offerings and how to combine cloud-based products from different vendors, as well as vetting those products for security vulnerabilities. Perot can host and manage it all from one of its massive data centers. 2 Sept. 25, 2009 Dell’s Perot Gamble InformationWeekanalytics.com Analytics Alerts Michael Dell says it’s a winning hand, combining “two iconic IT brands who share a common vision of reducing IT complexity and total cost of ownership.” It sounds good, but Steve Martin, a partner at Pace Harmon consultants, wonders if Dell has the management chops to make it happen. “Perot is very methodical and somewhat stiff and regimented,” Martin says. “That’s not the culture that Dell has had. ... The integration issues are not going to be trivial.” In its favor, Dell deepened its bench strength earlier this year, hiring IBM’s top M&A guru, David Johnson, whose experience could be crucial to Dell’s ability to add Perot’s operations without alienating customers or employees. Dell has made six acquisitions in the past two years, with its only major one being the $1.4 billion takeover of storage specialist EqualLogic. At IBM, Johnson oversaw 14 significant acquisitions last year alone. One possible hitch: Johnson’s participation isn’t assured. IBM sued the exec earlier this year for breach of contract, asking a judge to force Johnson to honor a noncompete clause. TIME TO DIVERSIFY Integration risks aside, many observers say Dell has little choice but to diversify. The recession, commoditization, and competition from a renewed HP have taken a toll on the company. Dell’s PC sales slumped 33% in the most recent quarter, while sales of servers and storage products were off 22% and 19%, respectively. The company’s reliance on hardware-related products for 90% of its revenue has saddled it with an anemic operating margin in the 5% range. In acquiring Perot, Dell is following in the footsteps of IBM and HP—computer industry giants that in recent years have sought to build out higher margin IT services and outsourcing busi- nesses to compensate for diminishing margins in the increasingly commoditized hardware mar- ket. Pairing services with hardware can also appeal to customers who prefer to deal with fewer vendors. IBM’s Global Services unit has accounted for about half the company’s revenue in recent years. HP, meanwhile, dramatically stepped up its presence in the outsourcing market with the $13.9 billion buyout of Electronic Data Systems last year. EDS, like Perot Systems, was founded by billionaire H. Ross Perot and is part of the Dallas area’s tech services corridor. The Perot deal is “a good first step” in Dell’s campaign to cut dependence on boxes, says JPMorgan analyst Mark Moskowitz. Perot has weathered the recession fairly well, but if Dell is to seriously challenge IBM and HP-EDS in outsourcing, it will have to take a company founded 3 Sept. 25, 2009 © 2009 InformationWeek, Reproduction Prohibited Dell’s Perot Gamble InformationWeekanalytics.com Analytics Alerts in 1988 by billionaire and gadfly politician H. Ross Perot well beyond its healthcare base. Perot Systems derives half its revenue from healthcare, 25% each from the commercial and govern- ment sectors. “We believe Dell will need to expand the services capabilities of Perot Systems to other verticals to establish a major enterprise services platform,” said Moskowitz, in a research note. Dell says it plans to do just that, calling its agreement to acquire Perot an “anchor” for other moves. The deal will bring Perot Systems capabilities to a much “wider set of customers” says Michael Dell, who envisions parlaying his company’s strength in numerous commercial segments into new accounts for Perot, which is on pace for $2.5 billion in sales in the current fiscal year. Meantime, customers of both companies will need to keep a close eye on the merger’s progress. For hardware buyers, there’s the potential to fall victim to up-selling as Dell will no doubt aggressively push service offerings onto its existing client base after the deal’s complete. And Perot customers need to guard against tempting bundling deals that look good up front but can hide the true cost of the individual pieces. “When there’s a bundled procurement, the vendors have an amazing ability to show you what they want to show you and hold back what they don’t want you to see,” says Pace Harmon’s Martin. “If the equipment provider and service provider are the same and that’s the best deal, then you contract together. But otherwise you want to look separately,” Martin says. Martin suggests Perot customers-or prospective customers-obtain certain guarantees before committing to new contracts while the outsourcer is in transition. Among other things, Martin advises getting written assurance that a particularly effective account rep or service delivery manager isn’t shunted off to “a hot Dell account.” Dell hopes to close the deal later this year or in early 2010. To get it done, it will buy up Perot’s outstanding Class A shares for $30 per share-a significant premium over Friday’s $17.91 clos- ing price. Current Perot Systems CEO Peter Altabef is expected to continue leading the opera- tion. Plans also call for Perot chairman Ross Perot Jr. to join Dell’s board. Dell said it believes the acquisition will contribute positively to earnings by 2012. 4 Sept. 25, 2009 © 2009 InformationWeek, Reproduction Prohibited Dell’s Perot Gamble InformationWeekanalytics.com Analytics Alerts Sept. 21, 2009 Dell’s Acquisition Of Perot Helps Healthcare Push By Marianne Kolbasuk McGee DELL’S $3.9 BILLION ACQUISITION of Perot Systems will help fortify Dell’s pursuit of new customers in the healthcare industry, a sector that’s been getting a lot of attention from Dell— and its competitors—in recent months. The federal government’s $20 billion HITECH stimulus program is creating significant demand for health IT products and services—such as the purchase and deployment of e-medical record systems. Vendors don’t want to be left out of that action, and Dell is no exception. The acquisition of Perot bolsters Dell’s professional services and IT consulting offering in gen- eral, positioning Dell to better compete against IBM and HP-EDS in general. But in the health- care sector in particular, this acquisition comes at a strategic time for Dell and Perot. “The economic stimulus will drive adoption of health IT; demand will be considerable,” said Eric Brown, a Forrester Research analyst who follows the healthcare IT arena closely. The Perot acquisition helps better position Dell to take advantage of this, he said. Perot has experience in large hospital deployments, particularly in administrative systems and claims processing, and some clinical use as well, he said. Earlier this month, Dell unveiled Dell Affiliated Physician EMR, a modular offering of services and products for cloud-based, hospital-sponsored e-medical record deployments in doctors’ offices. As part of that, Perot was offering its hosted services to support those installations of third-party EMR software running on Dell computers. That last announcement seemed like a natural evolution to an alliance that Dell and Perot unveiled last April to sell integrated systems, including virtualized desktops, storage, and server implementation to hospitals and physician practices. “If you don’t have a professional services organization, you’re out of the game,” said Brown. Customers in healthcare—and other industries, for that matter—“are looking for outcomes,” he said. And for hospitals and doctors’ offices, those outcomes include implementing and using health IT to meet the U.S. government’s “meaningful use” requirements for getting stimulus rewards starting in 2011.
Recommended publications
  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
    Case 3:14-cv-03264-JD Document 1709 Filed 06/26/17 Page 1 of 17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 14 IN RE: CAPACITORS ANTITRUST MASTER FILE NO. 3:14-cv-03264-JD LITIGATION 15 [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO 16 THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: DEFENDANT OKAYA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. 17 ALL INDIRECT PURCHASER ACTIONS 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Law Offices Final Judgment of Dismissal with Prejudice as to Approval of Settlements with Defendant Okaya Electric Industries Co., Ltd.; COTCHETT, PITRE & Case No. 3:14-cv-03264-JD MCCARTHY, LLP Case 3:14-cv-03264-JD Document 1709 Filed 06/26/17 Page 2 of 17 1 This matter has come before the Court to determine whether there is any cause why this 2 Court should not enter Final Judgment as to Defendant Okaya Electric Industries Co., Ltd. 3 (“Okaya”). The Court, having reviewed the settlement agreement between Plaintiffs Michael 4 Brooks, CAE Sound, Steve Wong, Toy-Knowlogy Inc., AGS Devices, Ltd., J&O Electronics, 5 Nebraska Dynamics, Inc., Angstrom, Inc., MakersLED, In Home Tech Solutions, Inc., 6 individually and on behalf of the Indirect Purchaser Class they seek to represent, on the one hand, 7 and Okaya, on the other, dated April 14, 2016 (the “Settlement Agreement”); Indirect Purchasers’ 8 Motion for Final Approval of Settlements with Defendants NEC TOKIN, Nitsuko and Okaya; the 9 pleadings and other papers on file in this action; and the statements of counsel and the parties, 10 including at the July 6, 2017 Fairness Hearing, hereby finds no just reason to delay the entry of 11 Final Judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b).
    [Show full text]
  • Dell Inc (4331) 10-K
    DELL INC (4331) 10-K Annual report pursuant to section 13 and 15(d) Filed on 03/13/2012 Filed Period 02/03/2012 Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 Form 10-K (Mark One) x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended February 3, 2012 or o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission file number: 0-17017 Dell Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 74-2487834 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) One Dell Way, Round Rock, Texas 78682 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 1-800-BUY-DELL Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered Common Stock, par value $.01 per share The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (NASDAQ Global Select Market) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No R Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No R Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
    Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 2321 Filed 05/16/18 Page 1 of 74 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 OAKLAND DIVISION 11 IN RE: LITHIUM ION BATTERIES Case No. 13-md-02420-YGR ANTITRUST LITIGATION 12 MDL No. 2420 13 FINAL JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL This Document Relates To: WITH PREJUDICE AS TO LG CHEM 14 DEFENDANTS ALL DIRECT PURCHASER ACTIONS 15 AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 FINAL JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO LG CHEM DEFENDANTS— Case No. 13-md-02420-YGR Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 2321 Filed 05/16/18 Page 2 of 74 1 This matter has come before the Court to determine whether there is any cause why this 2 Court should not approve the settlement between Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs (“Plaintiffs”) and 3 Defendants LG Chem, Ltd. and LG Chem America, Inc. (together “LG Chem”), set forth in the 4 parties’ settlement agreement dated October 2, 2017, in the above-captioned litigation. The Court, 5 after carefully considering all papers filed and proceedings held herein and otherwise being fully 6 informed, has determined (1) that the settlement agreement should be approved, and (2) that there 7 is no just reason for delay of the entry of this Judgment approving the settlement agreement. 8 Accordingly, the Court directs entry of Judgment which shall constitute a final adjudication of this 9 case on the merits as to the parties to the settlement agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • Capacitors Exclusions 2017-06-06.Xlsx
    Case 3:14-cv-03264-JD Document 1705-4 Filed 06/26/17 Page 1 of 13 EXHIBIT D Case 3:14-cv-03264-JD Document 1705-4 Filed 06/26/17 Page 2 of 13 In re Capacitors Antitrust Litigation Exclusion Report Name Exclusion ID # Postmark Date 1 Acer, Inc. 41778552-1 2/10/2017 2 Acer America Corporation 41778552-2 2/10/2017 3 Gateway, Inc. 41778552-3 2/10/2017 4 Gateway U.S. Retail, Inc (f/k/a eMachines, Inc) 41778552-4 2/10/2017 5 Packard Bell B.V. 41778552-5 2/10/2017 6 BlackBerry Limited (f/k/a Research in Motion Limited) 41778553-1 2/15/2017 7 BlackBerry Corporation (f/k/a Research in Motion Corporation) 41778553-2 2/15/2017 8 BlackBerry Singapore Pte. Limited (f/k/a Research in Motion Singapore Pte. Limited) 41778553-3 2/15/2017 9 BlackBerry UK Limited (f/k/a Research in Motion UK Limited 41778553-4 2/15/2017 10 Plexus Corp. 41778554-1 2/14/2017 11 Plexus Asia, Ltd. 41778554-2 2/14/2017 12 Plexus Corp. Limited 41778554-3 2/14/2017 13 Plexus Corporation (UK) Limited 41778554-4 2/14/2017 14 Plexus Deutschland GmbH 41778554-5 2/14/2017 15 Plexus Electronica S. de R.L. de C.V. 41778554-6 2/14/2017 16 Plexus (Hangzhou) Co., Ltd. 41778554-7 2/14/2017 17 Plexus International Services, Inc. 41778554-8 2/14/2017 18 Plexus Intl. Sales & Logistics, LLC 41778554-9 2/14/2017 19 Plexus Manufacturing Sdn.
    [Show full text]
  • Why the Dell / EMC Combination Makes Sense for Customers
    Why the Dell / EMC Combination Makes Sense for Customers Synergistic product portfolio and go-to-market strategies have potential to set IT customers up for success in the digital economy Executive Summary One of the biggest technology deals in history at over $60 billion is about to unfold as Dell prepares to buy EMC. At EMC World in May 2016, Michael Dell made this acquisition more real than ever when he announced the new entity’s name, Dell Technologies, which will be an umbrella brand for the collection of companies that will include enterprise and client solutions and services, and other strategic assets including VMware, Pivotal, RSA, Virtustream, and SecureWorks. With just a few major milestones to go, it appears that all is on track for the companies to merge the enterprise organizations as Dell EMC under the umbrella brand and to begin operating as one by around mid-year. Dell and EMC are positioning themselves as the path to the cloud for IT customers. Moor Insights & Strategy (MI&S) believes Dell’s leadership in compute and EMC’s leadership in storage and converged infrastructure have the potential to become building blocks for a one-stop shop for enterprise datacenter customers. Other assets such as security, virtualization software, and cloud solutions can help round out the portfolio. Moreover, Dell’s client computing business and IoT practices can bring insight into client computing and IoT models that will be key drivers for future datacenter requirements. Dell EMC should focus on continuing to build up their networking business and making it a more cohesive part of their end-to-end datacenter story.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware City
    EFiled: Feb 19 2013 09:26AM EST Transaction ID 49611480 Case No. 8329­ IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE CITY OF ROSEVILLE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. v. DELL, INC., MICHAEL DELL, JAMES W. BREYER, DONALD J. CARTY, JANET F. CLARK, LAURA CONIGLIARO, KENNETH M. DUBERSTEIN, WILLIAM H. GRAY, III, GERARD J. KLEISTERLEE, KLAUS S. LUFT, ALEX J. MANDL, SHANTANU NARAYEN, ROSS PEROT, JR., DENALI HOLDING INC., DENALI INTERMEDIATE INC., DENALI ACQUIROR INC., SILVER LAKE PARTNERS, L.P., SILVER LAKE PARTNERS III, L.P., SILVER LAKE PARTNERS IV, L.P., SILVER LAKE TECHNOLOGY INVESTORS III, L.P., and MSDC MANAGEMENT, L.P., Defendants. VERIFIED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT City of Roseville Employees’ Retirement System (“Plaintiff”), by and through its undersigned counsel, upon knowledge as to itself and upon information and belief as to all other matters, alleges as follows: NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. This action challenges Michael Dell’s attempt to take Dell, Inc. (“Dell” or the “Company”) private in a transaction (the “Going Private Transaction”) that offers Dell’s public shareholders an egregiously unfair price and threatens to foreclose them from sharing in any of the benefits to be obtained by the Company’s unfolding turnaround plan. The Going Private Transaction offers Dell’s public shareholders $13.65 per share – a price so patently unfair that it prompted one shareholder to question whether company insiders are “trying to steal the company because of current market conditions.” The $13.65 per share purchase price is approximately 3% less than the price at which the stock was trading just days prior to the Transaction’s announcement, represents only a 25% premium over the stock’s trading price before news of a potential transaction was reported, and amounts to a 34% discount from the prices at which Dell was trading a year ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Electronic Data Systems) - Corporate Profile
    EDS EDS (Electronic Data Systems) - Corporate Profile [LAST UPDATED OCTOBER 2002] Click ahead to the Economic Profile section Click ahead to the Political Profile section Click ahead to the Social Profile section Click Ahead to the Stakeholder Profile section Click Ahead to the Quotations section (For background information on how these sections are organized, click here) 1. Organizational Profile According to their website: “EDS, the leading global services company, provides strategy, implementation and hosting for clients managing the business and technology complexities of the digital economy. EDS brings together the world’s best technologies to address critical client business imperatives.” They provide information technology services to various businesses and governments. Regarding governments, this includes such areas as welfare provision, Medicaid provision, U.S. Armed Forces Infrastructure, security systems management,… This is originally the company that made Ross Perot rich, as he is the founder. EDS made its money as the ‘original’ private contractor for government and Perot invested heavily in his political connections to do so. This included direct contacts in the Nixon administration and things such as Perot being a consultant for EDS’s first Medicare client Texas Blue Cross. Perot has since broken away from EDS, though EDS continues to be a major provider of outsourced government services, including, as mentioned above, being a major player in welfare and Medicaid provision, which is the focus of this profile. On September 18th 2002, EDS announced that its earnings per share for the quarter ending September 30th were likely to be much lower than previously stated. This caused EDS' share price to fall dramatically, losing more than half its value the following day and fell to as far down ad $10.09 on September 24th.
    [Show full text]
  • Electronic Data Systems Inc
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Release No. 56519 / September 25, 2007 ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING ENFORCEMENT Release No. 2725 / September 25, 2007 ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING File No. 3-12825 In the Matter of ORDER INSTITUTING CEASE-AND- DESIST PROCEEDINGS, MAKING ELECTRONIC DATA FINDINGS AND IMPOSING A CEASE- SYSTEMS CORPORATION, AND-DESIST ORDER PURSUANT TO SECTION 21C OF THE SECURITIES Respondent. EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 I. The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it appropriate that cease- and-desist proceedings be, and hereby are, instituted pursuant to Section 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) against Electronic Data Systems Inc. (“Respondent” or “EDS”). II. In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, EDS has submitted an Offer of Settlement (the “Offer”) which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the purposes of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the Commission, or to which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the findings herein, except as to the Commission’s jurisdiction over it and the subject matter of these proceedings, which are admitted, Respondent consents to the entry of this Order Instituting Cease-and-Desist Proceedings, Making Findings and Imposing a Cease-and-Desist Order Pursuant to Section 21C of the Exchange Act (“Order”), as set forth below. III. On the basis of this Order and Respondent’s Offer, the Commission finds that:1 A. RESPONDENT EDS is a Delaware corporation headquartered in Plano, Texas. EDS is in the business of providing information technology services.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2008 CEO Letter
    Annual Report 2008 CEO letter Dear Fellow Stockholders, Fiscal 2008 was a strong year with some notable HP gained share in key segments, while continuing accomplishments. We have prepared HP to perform to show discipline in our pricing and promotions. well and are building a company that can deliver Software, services, notebooks, blades and storage meaningful value to our customers and stockholders each posted double­digit revenue growth, for the long term. Looking ahead, it is important to highlighting both our market­leading technology and separate 2008 from 2009, and acknowledge the improved execution. Technology Services showed difficult economic landscape. While we have made particular strength with double­digit growth in much progress, there is still much work to do. revenue for the year and improved profitability. 2008—Solid Progress and Performance in a Tough The EDS Acquisition—Disciplined Execution of a Environment Multi­year Strategy With the acquisition of Electronic Data Systems In August, HP completed its acquisition of EDS, a Corporation (EDS), we continued implementing a global technology services, outsourcing and multi­year strategy to create the world’s leading consulting leader, for a purchase price of $13 technology company. Additionally, we made solid billion. The EDS integration is at or ahead of the progress on a number of core initiatives, including operational plans we announced in September, and the substantial completion of phase one of HP’s customer response to the acquisition remains very information technology transformation. positive. Fiscal 2008 was also a difficult year, during which The addition of EDS further expands HP’s economic conditions deteriorated.
    [Show full text]
  • Board of Directors
    Board of Directors Dr. Friedrich Froeschl Chairman Mr. Francesco Serafini Vice Chairman Mr. Balu Ganesh Ayyar Chief Executive Officer Mr. Nawshir Mirza Mr. Davinder Singh Brar Mr. Prakash Jothee Mr. Balu Doraisamy Mr. Juergen Reiners Mr. Gerard Brossard COMPANY SECRETARY, GENERAL COUNSEL AND HEAD - GLOBAL ETHICS AND COMPLIANCE Mr. A. Sivaram Nair AUDITORS REGISTERED OFFICE REGISTRAR & SHARE TRANSFER AGENT S.R. Batliboi & Co. Bagmane Technology Park Integrated Enterprises (India) Limited UB City, ‘Canberra Block’ Byrasandra, C V Raman Nagar 30, Ramana Residency, 4th Cross, 12th and 13th Floor Bangalore - 560 001, India Sampige Road, Malleswaram 24, Vittal Mallya Road Ph: +91 80 4004 0404 Bangalore - 560 003, India Bangalore – 560 001, India www.mphasis.com Ph: +91 80 23460815 - 818 17 Management Discussion of Risks and Concerns Your Company has instituted a Continuous Global Risk Management framework to proactively identify, mitigate, monitor and report risks across various functions in the organization and to facilitate tracking and review continuously. Broadly risks are categorised into i) Strategy (as it has potential to impact entity’s mission which arise out of strategic decisions and has potential to impact long term operations on marketing /resource allocation / delivery models etc and are generally non-routine in nature); ii) Operational (as it has potential to impact objectives to achieve efficiency and effectiveness in operations); iii) Financial & Reporting (as it has potential to impact financial elements and objectives to facilitate timely and accurate information to stakeholders); and iv) Compliance (as it has potential to impact objectives to adhere to laws and regulations) The Risk Governance Committee comprising of the Chief Risk Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and the Company Secretary & General Counsel periodically evaluates various risks and mitigation efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • HP and the Occupation
    HP and the Occupation In December 2009, the Israeli Knesset passed a law allowing for the creation of a biometric database of the inhabitants of Israel. As of January 2013, the program is in its initial testing stage. On December 1, 2008, the American corporation Hewlett- Packard won the contract for the development and dispersal of 5 million biometric identification cards as well as the creation and maintenance of the biometric database, a year before the law was passed. The contract was worth 270 million New Israeli Shekels (NIS), or $72 million. In that same month, an HP subsidiary, Electronic Data Systems (EDS), won a yearly 8 million NIS contract for the systemization of biometric data and the installation of the biometric data system in government offices that would issue the ID cards. The political and philosophical implications of the creation of such a thorough biometric database for a nation’s citizenry are complex and worthy of exhaustive discussion, but the implications of the creation of the same system for a population that has been militarily occupied for over 40 years and has no say in its occupier’s government deserves international outcry. There already is a biometric database for the Palestinians, the use of which is oppressive and a serious concern for whatever hope of peace that remains. Biometrics and Restrictions on Palestinian Movement: The Basel System Israeli officials contend that the separation wall, which snakes through the occupied West Bank dissecting agricultural lands from their owners, and the arduous, congested checkpoints that serve as the only permeable entry points for Palestinians laboring in Israel, are necessary and simply intended for security.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement 2011
    NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT 2011 May 26, 2011 Dear Fellow Stockholders: On behalf of the Board of Directors, it is my pleasure to invite you to Dell’s 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The meeting will be held on Friday, July 15, 2011, at 8:00 a.m., Central Daylight Time, at the Dell Round Rock Campus, 501 Dell Way, Building 2-East, Houston/Dallas conference rooms, Round Rock, Texas 78682. For your convenience, we are also offering a live Webcast of the meeting. You may attend and participate in the meeting via the Internet at www.dell.com/investor, where you will be able to vote electronically and submit questions during the meeting. If you choose to view the Webcast, go to www.dell.com/investor shortly before the meeting time and follow the instructions provided. If you miss the meeting, you can view a replay of the Webcast on that site. You will find information regarding the matters to be voted on in the attached Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement. We are sending many of our stockholders a notice regarding the availability of this proxy statement, our Annual Report on Form 10-K for Fiscal 2011 and other proxy materials via the Internet. This electronic process gives you fast, convenient access to the materials, reduces the impact on the environment and reduces our printing and mailing costs. A paper copy of these materials may be requested using one of the methods described in the materials. You may visit www.dell.com/investor to access an interactive Fiscal 2011 Year-in-Review, as well as various web-based reports, executive messages and timely information on Dell’s global business.
    [Show full text]